Sky View Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 33 beds and averages 27.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 of 3 residents (R3, R18, and R21) or the residents' legal representatives were notified of the reason for a transfer/discharge and did not ensure they were provided a bed hold policy in writing including the rate to reserve the residents' beds.The facility did not include the daily rate for bed hold to R18 and R21 prior to transfer to hospital.R3's, R18, and R21 transfer form did not contain appeal rights or ombudsman contact information. Findings include: Example 1 R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 03/17/2026 and 04/04/2026, R18 was transferred to the hospital. R18's medical record did not include documentation that R18 or R18's legal representative was provided with written or verbal communication of bed-hold daily rate charges. The facility's written transfer/discharge notice did not include ombudsman contact or the resident's right to appeal discharge for R18. Example 2 R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] On 01/01/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to maintain a resident's highest practicable level of physical well-being for 1 (R25) of 12 residents reviewed.R25 was diabetic and had as-needed (PRN) insulin for blood sugars > (greater than) 400 mg (milligrams)/dL (deciliter). The facility did not follow the provider's orders to administer PRN (as needed) insulin and did not notify the provider of blood sugars outside of parameters.This is evidenced by:R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia.R25's physician orders include:On 05/09/25, Facility standing orders ok.On 03/05/26, Novolin R (regular insulin) give 10 units subcutaneously for blood sugars >/= (equal to) 400 as needed every 2 hours until blood sugar < (less than) 300.Surveyor reviewed R25's medication administration record (MAR):On 03/21/2026 at 6:09 PM, blood sugar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 2 (R9, R7) out of 13 residents observed. The facility did not have Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) signage displayed near the door or in room for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and staff did not consistently use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when in direct contact with R7 who is on EBP.Staff inserted eye drops for R9 with contaminated gloves and did not practice hand hygiene when gloves were changed.Findings include:Example 1On 4/27/2026 at approximately 10 AM, Surveyor observed R7 has a urinary catheter. R7 does not have Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) signage near the entry of his room or anywhere in his room. Surveyor also observed there was no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in the entry way or room of R7.On 4/28/2026 at 1:04 PM, Surveyor observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper sanitization and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness for all 29 residents. -Chemical dishwasher temperature did not reach the required 120 degrees. -Perishable item was only good for 24 hours after thawing. Item was not labeled to ensure it was discarded timely to prevent foodborne illnesses to the residents. Evidenced by: Example 1 According to federal regulation §483.60(i)(1)-(2), Low Temperature Dishwasher (chemical sanitization): Wash - 120 degrees F; and Final Rinse - 50 ppm (parts per million) hypochlorite (chlorine) on dish surface in final rinse. On 03/03/25 at 8:50 AM, Surveyor observed Dietary Staff (DS) C wash dishes in the dishwasher. DS C stated that it is a chemical sanitizing dishwasher. Surveyor asked where the thermometer is that they record the dishwasher temperatures. DS C showed Surveyor the thermometer on the lower unit of the dishwasher and began a washing cycle. Surveyor observed and confirmed with DS C that the temperatures reached a high of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not always serve food to 4 out of 13 residents (R11, R13, R23, and R29) that was palatable and served at the proper temperature. R11, R13, R23, and R29 all had food complaints that food was not palatable. This is evidenced by: Example 1 Federal regulation 483.60(d)(2) states, each resident receives and the facility provides food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. On 03/03/25 at 11:10 AM, Surveyor observed lunch food arrived in steam table containers that were transported from a sister facility. Surveyor requested a test tray to be sent on the last cart to be delivered to the wing. Surveyor observed Dietary Staff (DS) C place food on steam table. Ground chicken and chopped carrots did not fit and were placed against the wall on the outer edge of the steam table. Food temperatures were checked and revealed the following: Chicken 166 degrees. Mashed potatoes 142 degrees. Carrots 182 degrees. Gravy 177 degrees.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-31 · tag F0729 — widespread
  Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 5 staff reviewed for verification of a current Nurse Aide Registry were on the Wisconsin registry before starting work in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 31 residents. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C was not on the Wisconsin Nurse Aide Registry and was working in the facility at the time of the discovery. Findings include: On 1/31/24, Surveyor reviewed CNA certifications for a sample of 5 CNAs. CNA C was hired on 6/19/23. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A provided a state of Michigan CNA registry for CNA C. No Wisconsin CNA registry information was provided. On 1/31/24 at 12:22 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A about the missing Wisconsin CNA Registry for CNA C. NHA A stated CNA C had lost her social security card and had been unable to obtain CNA registry in Wisconsin. NHA A stated that they have been working on this for a while now. On 1/31/24 at 1:57 PM, NHA A provided Surveyor with a Wisconsin CNA registration for CNA C with a valid date of 1/31/24. This was completed today after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-31 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to submit Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandatory Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data for the third quarter of 2023 (April 1-June 30). This has the potential to affect all 31 residents. This is evidenced by: Surveyor noted the facility failed to submit PBJ data for Fiscal Year Quarter 3. On 1/31/24 at 2:41 PM, Surveyor completed an interview with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A and Payroll Specialist (PS) D about the PBJ submissions. PS D stated the facility attempted to submit PBJ on the deadline date but was unable to do so. PS D stated that PS D was unaware that this needed to be submitted prior to the deadline date. PS D stated that he made sure Quarter 4 was submitted on-time and stated the next quarter submission, due 2/14/24, would also be submitted on time. Surveyor then reviewed the staff schedules for that time period (April 1 -June 30, 2023) and compared the data with time punches. There were no concerns uncovered related to licensed staff coverage or Certified Nursing Assistant coverage. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in WI