Oak Park Place of Janesville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 29.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 77% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three of three residents (R3 and R1) of 8 sampled residents. The facility failed to assess and monitor R3's diuretic medication and provide supplemental medication to prevent critical laboratory values which caused R3 to be hospitalized due to the critically low blood levels. In addition, the facility failed to monitor and document R1 and R3's physician ordered weights. These failures placed the residents at increased risk of health complications and hospitalization. R3 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R1 is being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Weighing and Measuring the Patient, dated March 2011, revealed .The purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height to provide a baseline and an ongoing record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. R1 has a history of multiple falls. Facility staff did not implement appropriate fall interventions and provide adequate supervision. R1 had a fall that resulted in a displaced right inferior pubic ramus fracture (a break in part of the pelvis). Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled, Falls Policy and Prevention Program dated 6/29/21, states in part; .all residents will receive adequate supervision, assistance, and assistive devices to aid in the prevention of falls . R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty in walking, dysphasia, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and altered mental status. R1's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/19/24, states that R1 has a BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for falls. R2 has a history of multiple falls. Facility staff did not implement appropriate fall interventions and provide adequate supervision. R2 had a fall that resulted in a head laceration requiring seven (7) sutures. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Falls Policy and Prevention Program dated 6/29/21 states in part, .All residents will receive adequate supervision, assistance, and assistive devices to aid in the prevention of falls . According to Superior Health Quality Alliance, Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a problem-solving method to investigate an actual or potential problem, incident or concern. A team looks beyond an immediate solution to understand the underlying cause(s) of the problem. Those causes are then changed to prevent the problem from happening again . Root Cause Analysis Toolkit for Long Term Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not document grievance or document prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances for 1 of 1 Residents (R1) reviewed for grievances.R1's AHCPOA (Activated Health Care Power of Attorney) voiced concerns to the NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) via email communication. The facility failed to follow their grievance policy by thoroughly investigating, following up, and documenting the concerns and resolution.Evidenced by:The facility policy, Grievance Program, hand dated, 5/15/24, indicates, in part: .Process: 1. Grievances - grievances are formal written or verbal complaints made to the facility when prompt or bedside resolution to the satisfaction of the person making the objection was not possible.When there is a grievance, it will be: Documented on the facility Comment/Concern Forms. Routed to the Grievance official. Listed on the appropriate facility Tracking Log. Discussed with the appropriate individuals .as warranted. Investigated accordingly.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect 24 of 25 residents. Surveyor observed staff going into the main kitchen and kitchenette without hairnets on. Surveyor observed food that had been removed from original containers and not labeled with a use by date. Surveyor observed a dented can to be in circulation. Surveyor observed food that was uncovered and/or not labeled in a kitchenette freezer and refrigerator. The freezer temperature in one of the kitchenettes is not being consistently monitored or recorded. Surveyor observed shelves with dried on substances, food particles, pieces of candy without wrappers, opened food without use by dates and expired food in circulation in the facility's kitchenette. Evidenced by: Example - Staff not wearing hairnets Facility policy entitled Hair Restraints with a revised date of 10/29/24 states, in part: .Hair must be pulled back and properly restrained when working with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect in an environment that promotes an enhanced quality of life which affected 6 of 15 sampled Residents (R174, R1, R172, R13, R223, and R73), 3 of 5 supplemental Residents (R173, R16, and R6), and 1 of 1 dining room. Surveyors observed residents who were dining in the main dining room to have Styrofoam cups instead of regular glasses. Surveyors observed meal trays for residents dining in their rooms to contain plastic silverware instead of metal silverware and Styrofoam cups instead of regular glasses. R73 was observed using plastic silverware and foam cups while eating breakfast in her room. R1 was observed using plastic silverware and foam cups in her room while eating breakfast. R13 was observed having plastic silverware and foam cups in his room while eating breakfast. Surveyor observed R16 eating breakfast in her room using plastic silverware. Surveyor observed R6 eating lunch in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 12 sampled residents (R12, R172, R223, and R224) and 2 supplemental residents (R5 and R171). R5, R171, and R172's room were not clean. Surveyor observed R12's bed to be unmade, dust bunnies under the bed, and flakes of debris on the floor near the wall. Surveyor observed R223's bed to be unmade and garbage can to be full. Surveyor observed the bed unmade, dust bunnies under the bed, a garbage can overflowing with a glove on the floor, and dried stool on the back of the toilet seat. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces, dated 8/19, includes the following: 9. Housekeeping surfaces (e.g., floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur, and when these surfaces are visibly soiled. Example 1 On 5/28/25 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor observed R5's room. R5 was not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop a discharge plan for 1 of 3 residents (R13) reviewed for discharge planning. R13 does not have a discharge care plan, nor has he had a care conference to discuss his discharge goals. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered revised 12/2016 states in part .4. Each resident's comprehensive care plan will be consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of care, including the right to: a. participate in the planning process .e. participate in establishing the expected goals and outcomes of care .5. The resident will be informed of his or her right to participate in his or her own treatment . R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), anxiety disorder, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), and recurrent depressive disorders. R13's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services for 2 of 2 residents (R1 and R174) reviewed for catheters. R1 had a catheter placed without an appropriate diagnosis and does not have a care plan for the catheter. R174's catheter bag was uncovered and viewable from the hallway. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Indwelling Catheter Evaluation/ Removal revised on 6/27/16 states in part Policy: It is the policy of [Facility Name] to ensure that residents receive care and services to prevent the use of an indwelling catheter, unless clinically necessary .4. When there is not supporting diagnosis for the use of the indwelling urinary catheter, the nurse will obtain an order from the physician or physician extender to remove. Example 1 R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and acute on chronic heart failure. R1's most…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident (R13) who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. R13 has a diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and does not have a complete trauma assessment or a care plan addressing triggers, resident specific approaches, or interventions. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Trauma- Informed and Culturally Competent Care revised 8/2022 states in part .Resident Assessment: 1. Assessment involves an in- depth process of evaluating the presence of symptoms, their relationship to trauma, as well as the identification of triggers. 2. Utilize licensed and trained clinicians who have been designated by the facility to conduct trauma assessments. 3. Use assessment tools that are facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled with an open date or expiration date in 1 of 1 medication rooms. The facility failed to ensure an open vial of tuberculin solution located in the medication room contained an open date and/or expiration date. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 2/2023 states in part .5. Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date. On 6/2/25 at 2:11 PM Surveyor and RN P (Registered Nurse) went to the medication room. Surveyor observed an open vial of Tuberculin solution in the refrigerator, in a bag without an open date or expiration date. Surveyor interviewed RN P. Surveyor asked RN P if the medication vial should be dated. RN P responded yes, and I might as well throw it out if not dated. Surveyor asked RN P whose responsibility is it to make sure medications are dated. RN P indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for hospice. R1 was receiving hospice services, and the facility failed to obtain hospice documentation. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Hospice Program revised date 7/2017 states in part .12. Our facility has designated (Name) (Title) to coordinate care provided to the resident by our facility staff and the hospice staff .He or she is responsible for the following: .d. Obtaining the following information from the hospice: (1) The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each resident; (2) Hospice election form; (3) Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each resident .13. Coordinated care plans for residents receiving hospice services will include the most recent hospice plan of care as well as the care and services provided by our facility (including the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 2 of 2 resident (R4 and R174) with observed breeches in transmission-based precautions. Staff entered R174, who is COVID-19 positive, without proper personal protective equipment (PPE). Surveyor observed staff perform tracheostomy care on R4 without proper hand hygiene and not using enhanced barrier precautions. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, dated 9/22, includes the following: 5. When a resident is placed on transmission-based precautions, appropriate notification is placed on the room entrance door and the on the front of the chart so that personnel and visitors are aware of the need for and the type of precaution. a. The signage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI