No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Clairidge House

1519 60th St, Kenosha, WI 53140 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (262) 656-7500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (262) 656-7500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6308 8th Ave · (262) 653-5300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5700 6th Ave · (262) 997-9573 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1901 63rd St · (262) 653-0132 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5728 13th Ct · (262) 652-3522 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1203 61st St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.8%16.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%5.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.6%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.0%16.9%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.0%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.6%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.1%24.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.5%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine52.4%82.2%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.901.661.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.782.291.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
46.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 37.8 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observations, the facility did not ensure residents received comprehensive assessments, interventions and treatment, to prevent and heal, pressure injuries. This was observed with 4 (R3, R9, R1 and R16) of 4 residents reviewed with pressure injury. *R3 was at high risk for a pressure injury, developed a facility acquired stage 3 pressure injury, that was not comprehensively assessed upon discovery. R3 did not have interventions revised to promote healing. This resulted in actual harm to R3. *R9 had facility acquired pressure injuries to the left upper posterior thigh area and left medial thigh. On 3/03/2026, Surveyor observed R9's wound treatment which was not completed per the order. R9's pressure injuries were determined to be due to R9 being provided with the incorrect size brief causing medical device related pressure injuries. R9's stage 2 left medial thigh pressure injury was not assessed, and treatment was not put into place until Surveyor questioned the treatment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the physician was consulted with regarding a possible change in condition for 1 (R20) of 1 sampled Residents.On 2/19/26 R20's recorded weight was significantly less than their previous weight. The facility did not consult with R2's physician regarding the possible weight loss.Findings include:The facility's Physician Notification-Consultation Parameters last revised 1/22 documents:Definitions:1. Immediate Notification/Consultation: A physician should be informed and consulted at the time the event occurs (but not later than 1 hour after the condition is identified) directly or via an electronic or telephone call system.2. Non-immediate Notification: The attending physician should be informed of the event during normal office hours, and generally no later than the next regular office day. Consultation with the physician may be required if clinically warranted. If a non-immediate event occurs on a weekend or holiday, licensed nurses must determine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure employees were screened for abuse prior to working at the facility. This was observed in 4 (M, N, O and P) of 8 staff reviewed.*Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-M was hired on 6/27/25 and worked out of state. The other state background check was not completed by their hire date.*Dietary Manager (DM) - N was hired on 1/9/25. Their Background Information Disclosure (BID) was not signed and dated. The Departement of Justice (DOJ) was not completed until 3/2/26. The Integrated Background Information System (IBIS) was not completed until 3/2/26.*CNA-O was hired on 1/19/26 and worked out of state. The other state background check was not completed by their hire date.* CNA-P was hired on 6/17/25. The DOJ was not completed until 7/2/25. The IBIS was not completed until 7/2/25.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure Resident Safe Abuse Policy dated 3/24 was reviewed. Protocol: 3. Procedures:a. ii. All Employees shall have a criminal background check.1. Initial and any required future background checks will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards with smoking materials for 3 (R1, R2, and R16) of 4 residents reviewed for smoking and residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (R20) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. *R1 was observed to be vaping while lying in bed. R1 did not have smoking assessments completed on a quarterly basis. *R2 was observed to have smoking materials in the room; R2's Care Plan documented R2 may not possess any smoking materials including a lighter and all smoking materials were to be kept with the nurse for distribution as requested. R2 did not have smoking assessments completed on a quarterly basis. *R16 did not have smoking assessments completed on a quarterly basis. *R20 had three falls that were not thoroughly investigated including identifying a root cause analysis. Observations of interventions of call light within reach and to be laid down after lunch were not implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure allegations of misappropriation of funds and neglect for two (R19 and R10) of 2 sampled residents were not reported as required. *R19 informed staff of missing money on 1/21/26 and this allegation was not reported to the State Survey Agency. *An allegation of neglect directly affecting R10 was not reported to the State Survey Agency. Findings include: The facility's Resident Safety Abuse Policy last revised 2/22 documents: Purpose: It is the policy of our facility to maintain a work and living environment that is professional and free from threat and/or occurrence of harassment, abuse (verbal, physical, mental, or sexual), neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Providing a safe environment is one of the most basic and essential duties of the facility. Employees have a unique position of trust…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure allegations involving potential misappropriation of funds and neglect were thoroughly investigated for 2 Residents (R19 and R10) of 2 sampled Residents. *R19 informed staff of missing money on 1/21/26 and this allegation was not thoroughly investigated by the facility. *An allegation of neglect directly affecting R10 was not thoroughly investigated by the facility. Findings include: The facility's Resident Safety Abuse Policy last revised 2/22 documents: Purpose It is the policy of our facility to maintain a work and living environment that is professional and free from threat and/or occurrence of harassment, abuse (verbal, physical, mental, or sexual), neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, physical or chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Providing a safe environment is one of the most basic and essential duties of the facility. Employees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not document a summary of information regarding the additional assessment performed on the care areas triggered by the completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 (R3, and R1) of 5 sampled residents. * R3's admission MDS, completed 7/7/25, Pressure injury Care Area Assessment (CAA) does not contain a comprehensive summary of triggered areas. *R1 had 10 Care Area Assessments (CAAs) triggered to be completed for the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. Documentation of summary information of the ten CAAs was not completed. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Resident Assessment Instrument and Person -Centered Care Planning, dated 4/25, was reviewed. The Purpose documents:The RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) is an OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) required process for conducting initial and periodic standardized, reproducible assessments of the functional capacity of all nursing home residents. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they notified the state mental health authority promptly for a resident review after a significant change in mental condition for 1 (R10) of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR. *R10 demonstrated increased mood related symptoms which required an extensive inpatient psychiatric stay. Following the hospitalization R10 was prescribed psychotropic medication to treat symptoms. R10 was readmitted to the facility and a new PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not completed and submitted to the state authority to ensure R10 received care and services in the most appropriate setting. Findings include:R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include general anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and current episode of depression, severe, with psychotic features. R10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicates R10 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R20) of 1 resident reviewed for diminishing abilities in activities of daily living, received the appropriate treatment to maintain or improve the ability to carry out activities of daily living.Findings include: The facility did not provide a policy and procedure for maintaining or improving activities of daily living (ADL(S)). R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's(progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Vascular Dementia(loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life) with Behavioral Disturbance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus(adult onset of trouble controlling blood sugar), Hypothyroidism(underactive thyroid), Hyperlipidemia(high levels of fat particles in blood), Chronic Kidney Disease(progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), and Hypertensive Heart Disease(long term conditions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure resident (R20) maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (R20) of 1 sampled residents with weight loss.R20's medical record indicated a deviation in R20's weight that reflected the potential for a severe weight loss. The facility did not reweigh R20 or requested assessment by the registered dietitian with the documented weight changes. The facility did not ensure R20's intake was monitored as care planned. Findings include:The facility's Weight Management policy and procedure last reviewed 9/25 documents:Purpose:An accurate body weight obtained at individually assessed intervals is one of the most reliable, inexpensive and non-invasive ways to identify when a resident is not obtaining adequate nutrition and/or hydration.6. Resident's weight information is reported by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to licensed nurse then recorded in the medical record by the licensed nurse in the electronic medical record.7. The licensed nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide necessary treatment and services to 1 (R16) 1 sampled residents with a history of substance abuse.R16 has a diagnosis of alcohol abuse and had sustained falls following episodes of drinking. The facility did not review and offer necessary supports toR16 to address substance abuse and to ensure R16's safety when drinking.Findings include:R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alcohol Abuse (pattern of drinking that interferes with day to day activities), and Major Depressive Disorder (persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest or pleasure in activities).R16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 1/22/26 documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score for R16 of 11, indicating R16 demonstrates moderately impaired skills for daily decision making. R16's MDS documents minimal depressive symptoms and no behaviors.R16's comprehensive care plan initiated 4/7/25 Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 (R20) of 1 sampled residents with a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral symptoms to allow them to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.* R20 was observed during the survey to not receive activities or stimulation based upon individual preferences and identified interests with a diagnosis of dementia. R20 was observed engaging in behaviors of repeatedly tapping and banging objects on tables without redirection or encouragement to do participate in an activity.Findings include:The facility's Dementia Management policy and procedure last revised 9/22 documents:Purpose:To ensure that facility staff members understand the needs of resident who display or are diagnosed with dementia and provide appropriate treatment and services to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of these individuals.Protocol:2. Staff will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R10) of 1 resident reviewed received medically related social services to attain their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being.* On 1/14/2025, R10 was committed for 6 months on a locked unit at a psychiatric facility for Suicidal Ideation (SI), mania and psychosis with substantial probability of physical harm to self, manifested by overt attempt or threat. R10 readmitted to the facility without a suicidal care plan put into place and no person-centered interventions specific to SI prevention in R10's care plan. Social Service Designee (SSD)-H was not aware of R10's history of SI and was not involved in R10's psychosocial care planning or follow up.Findings include:R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.R10's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicates R10 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 with intact cognition, no behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to 1 (R10) of 1 sampled residents receiving pain medications. R10 was seen in the emergency room (ER) on 11/1/25 for hip pain. R10 returned to the facility with recommendations to take Tylenol 650mg 3 times per day with or without ibuprofen 600mg twice a day, as needed for pain. There is no indication this recommendation was reviewed with R10's physician or medication orders at the time were adjusted to implement this recommendation for pain management. Additionally, R10 received multiple doses of as needed (PRN) Tramadol for pain management without a rating of R10's pain prior to administration or documentation of the effectiveness of the medication. Findings Include:The facility's policy, titled Pain Recognition and Management, last revised 4/2025, documents: . 8. Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement Considerations: a. For residents experiencing ongoing/unresolved moderate to severe pain, review the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident received an antibiotic medication with adequate indications for use for 1 (R5) of 6 sampled residents.*R5 was prescribed, and administered, the antibiotic (Macrobid) without adequate indications of an infection.Findings include: R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is currently receiving hospice services. The Nurses Note dated 2/11/2026, at 5:29 PM, By Registered Nurse (RN)-D documents: (R5) complained of burning sensation to her vagina area. RN-D called the hospice nurse and received orders to start Macrobid 100 mg (milligram) Po (oral) BID (twice a day) times 7 days. RN-D faxed order to primary and (name of) pharmacy. RN-D placed R5 on alert charting times 7 days.R5's February 2026 Medication Administration Record documents Macrobid 100 mg was administered, BID from 2/12 - 2/17/26, for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).R5's medical record does not have documentation of clinical indications for the antibiotic or Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (R9) of 5 residents observed with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).*R9 has a Facility acquired pressure injury to the left upper posterior thigh area and left medial thigh. On 3/02/2026, Surveyor observed R9's incontinence care and on 3/03/2026, observed R9's wound treatment. The Facility staff did not wear the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while performing R5's wound treatment or incontinence cares.Findings include:The Facility's police, titled Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions, with a last revised date of 2/2024, indicated, . 11. Enhanced Barrier Precautions . a. When required, Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used IN ADDITION TO Standard Precautions. i. Enhanced Barrier precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not offer the influenza immunization for 2 (R16 and R5) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations.R5 and R17 were not offered the influenza (flu) immunization on admission to the facility and the facility did not document if the immunizations were offered and declined.Findings Include:The facility policy titled Influenza Immunization - Resident Reviewed 2/25, Revised 2/21 documented:All residents will receive vaccination annually between October 1st and mid November, at the direction of the facility medical director and Q API committee.Residents admitted during the winter months (October 1st through March 31st) will receive influenza vaccination at admission, if they have not already received it unless there is a medical contraindication.If a resident refuses vaccination, the refusal is to be documented in the nurse's notes of the residence record, and his statement included which states that the resident was made aware of the risks of refusing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not offer the COVID-19 immunization for 1 (R16) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations.R16 was not offered the COVID-19 immunization on admission to the facility and the facility did not document if the immunizations were offered and declined.Findings Include:The facility policy titled Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccination - Resident. Last reviewed 3/24, last revised 4/25 documented:Coronavirus vaccination is strongly recommended and applies to all the residents. When COVID-19 vaccination is available to the facility, each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized.Before offering COVID-19 vaccine, each resident or the resident representative is provided with education regarding the benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. In situations where COVID-19 vaccination requires multiple doses, the resident or resident representative is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, document review, and staff interview, the facility failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. Failure to designate a person had the potential to result in food not being prepared, stored, or served in a sanitary manner with the potential to result in food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 41 of 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 10:34 AM, during the initial tour of the dietary department, Cook1 and Dietary Aid (DA)1 were working in the kitchen and when asked who the Dietary Manager/Director of Food Services was they both stated they did not have one. Cook1 stated she used to be the interim supervisor until they hired one. They stated a Director of Dietary was hired and then quit and they have not had a supervisor since he left. Interview on 10/15/24 at 4:10 PM, the Corporate Clinical Consultant and the Administrator stated the facility had a consultant Dietitian who provided consulting services once a week. They stated they did not have a person designated as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dishwasher sanitizer was maintained at a level required to sanitize the dishes. Failure to ensure the sanitizer level of the dishwasher was at the required level had the potential to result in food borne illness or the spread of infections for all 41 of 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 10:34 AM, the sanitizer in the low temperature dishwasher was checked by Dietary Aid (DA)1. The chlorine test strip did not change color indicating the chlorine sanitizer was at zero parts per million (ppm). The sanitizer was checked three times and each time the test strip did not turn colors. DA1 was asked if she tested it prior to washing the breakfast dishes and she stated she had and stated the test strip had not turned colors prior to using it to wash the breakfast dishes. On 10/15/24 at 1:05 PM, DA1 was observed running the soiled plates from the lunch meal through the dishwasher. After running two racks of dishes through the dishwasher,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean, sanitary, and homelike. This had the potential to result in the spread of infection; residents being injured as the result of a loose toilet seat; a decline in residents' self-esteem. This affected five (Resident (R) 26, R32, R23, R9, and R22) of 41 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 10/15/24 at 2:57 PM; on 10/16/24 at 9:00 AM, 12:28 PM, and 3:38 PM; on 10/17/24 at 9:36 AM and 3:30 PM; and on 10/18/24 at 11:00 AM there was an unlabeled urinal on the floor of R26 and R32's bathroom and the pull cord on the bathroom call light was soiled with a brown substance. The urinal was lying on its side to the back of the toilet. On 10/17/24 at 3:30 PM the Social Service Director (SSD) verified the urinal was on the floor and the call cord was visibly soiled. On 10/28/24 at 11:00 AM the Maintenance Director verified the observation. On 10/17/24 at 9:36 AM and 3:30 PM a soiled incontinent brief with bowel movement on it was observed on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure one resident out of 28 sampled residents (Resident (R) 36) had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Failure to code the MDS correctly regarding R36's feeding tube, could lead to inaccurate assessment and care planning of the resident. Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual dated 10/01/19, indicated, . information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy by the IDT [interdisciplinary team] completing the assessment.'' Review of Section K of the RAI manual indicated, DEFINITIONS PARENTERAL/IV [Intravenous] FEEDING Introduction of a nutritive substance into the body by means other than the intestinal tract (e.g., subcutaneous, intravenous). FEEDING TUBE Presence of any type of tube that can deliver food/nutritional substances/ fluids directly into the gastrointestinal system. Examples include, but are not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter had a physician's order for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for one of two residents (R)34) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care. As a result of this deficient practice, the resident had the potential for harm by staff performing interventions or actions without a physician's order. Findings include: Review of R34's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab, revealed an admission date of 03/27/24 with medical diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. Observation on 10/15/24 at 3:30 PM, R34 had an urinary catheter tubing sticking out of the bottom of his pant leg, connected to a urinary collection bag. Review of R34's Care Plan under the Care Plan tab in the EMR revealed, Has Foley [indwelling urinary catheter] due to spinal cord injury with subsequent development of neurogenic bladder with the intervention to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a feeding tube (gastrostomy tube) had a physician's order for the care and management of the feeding tube for one of one resident (Resident (R)36) reviewed for gastrostomy care. As a result of this deficient practice, the resident had the potential for harm by staff performing interventions or actions without a physician's order. Findings include: Review of R36's Face Sheet under the Face Sheet tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 02/21/24 with medical diagnosis of Gastrostomy status [feeding tube]. Review of the Care Plan under the Care Plan tab in the EMR documented, Alteration in nutrition (less than body requirements) history of severe protein malnutrition, past history of significant weight loss, with recent improvement /rebound, wounds, has g-tube [gastrostomy tube] refuses to use, dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] due to a failed swallow study on 10/10/24. Review of R36's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed for the months of June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)41 out of three residents observed with a medication in a cup on the bedside table was administered his medication when the nurse dispensed the medication. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for health decline. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy provided by the facility titled, Medication Administration Scheduling Guidelines dated 5/19 revealed, .the facility requires that drugs be administered by the nurse until the care planning team has the opportunity to obtain necessary information of the residents' ability to safely self-administer medication. During an observation on 10/17/24 at 9:00 AM, with Register Nurse (RN)2, R41 was in his room and a pill was in a medication cup on the resident's bedside table. RN2 asked R41 if the night shift nurse had awakened him to give his medication. R41 stated, no the nurse did not wake him up during the night to give his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, document review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were under double lock for one of two medication rooms (second floor), and that the individual controlled count sheets reflected the signatures of the nurses who had administered the narcotics to the residents for three of fourteen residents (R) 32, R37 and R24). This failure had the potential for controlled substances to be diverted. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy, provided by the facility, titled Controlled Substance revised on 4/21 and reviewed on 7/24 revealed, purpose was to ensure appropriate and consistent procedures for safeguarding controlled substances are followed from delivery through the actual administration and/or destroying of medication. The policy further revealed the protocol to follow was all controlled substances will be counted by two nurses at each shift change. The ongoing nurse will count the controlled substances and the off going nurse will verify the count from the individual controlled substances count sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the staff were prepared and educated for the care of one resident (Resident (R)26) with a portable infusion pump delivering chemotherapy drugs through a surgically implanted port. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents and staff had the potential for harm and/or injury due to lack of knowledge for: the care of the pump and tubing; awareness of the hazards of the chemotherapy drug and potential exposure risks with a leak or spill; and biohazard containment of a chemotherapy drug if a leak/spill did occur. Findings include: Review of R26's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab, revealed an admission date of 03/15/24 with medical diagnoses that included chronic viral hepatitis C, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, and new rectal cancer diagnosis. Review of the 24-Hour Nursing report sheet (not a part of the resident medical record) dated 10/13/24, provided by the facility, documented R26 returned from a clinic appointment at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not have a system in place on how staff should respond, what staff should do in the event of a Resident requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and ensure the necessary equipment was provided for R3's code event. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 23 Residents residing in the Facility who have determined their code status to be CPR. On [DATE] R3 had a change of condition which led to CPR being performed. LPN-E started compressions prior to checking R3's code status. LPN-E instructed CNA-F to call 911 and the other nurse, who was working on the other floor. CNA-F was unable to get through to 911 or the other nurse on the telephone. LPN-E while doing compressions used his personal cell phone to call 911. CNA-F had to take the elevator to the 2nd floor to inform RN-D there was an incident with R3. The Automated External Defibrillator (AED) which is located on either the first or 2nd floor was not brought up to the 3rd floor for R3. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R6) of 6 Residents was given the right to formulate their preference regarding their code status and have the facility correctly reflect that preference. *R6's POLST (Provider Orders for Scope of Treatment) signed, not dated by R6 is checked for Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR. On [DATE] R6 was hospitalized and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The hospital discharge summary for date of discharge [DATE] documents Code Status: Full Code. R6's medical record contained conflicting details regarding R6's code status and there is no evidence the Facility spoke with R6 regarding this conflicting code status. Findings include: The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Orders policy and procedure last revised 6/22 under protocol documents: 1. Upon admission, the licensed nurse or social worker will discuss the options, CPR or DNR and any other advance directives with the resident and/or legal representative, and receive the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not notify a Resident's representative of a new form of treatment involving a cream medication to treat scabies involving 2 (R7 and R3) of 2 Residents reviewed for notification of a representative. *R7 was diagnosed with scabies on 9/14/23 and 10/14/23 with a treatment ordered upon each occurrence. There is no indication in R7's medical record that R7's guardian was notified with each occurrence. *R3 was diagnosed with scabies on 9/17/23 and a new treatment was ordered. R3's activated Health Care Power of Attorney (HCPOA) was not notified. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's change in Residents Condition/Status: Resident, Physician and Family/Legal Representative Notification/Consultation policy and procedure last revised 8/21 and notes the following applicable: .5. Unless otherwise instructed by the competent Resident, the Licensed Nurse will notify the Resident's family or legal representative when: d. There is a need to alter treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 serving kitchens. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents currently in the facility. *Opened cereal stored in 12 QT (quart) containers did not have a date. *Expired taco meat dated 8/14/23 was observed in the main cooler. *Unit refrigerator in 3rd floor kitchenette was not monitored for appropriate temperatures and frost build-up was an inch thick on the inside back wall of refrigerator. Findings include: Food Storage The facility policy, entitled, Food Storage Standards, dated 5/2022, states: #3. Criteria for Dry Food Storage f. Working containers holding dry food or ingredients that are removed from their original packages are identified with the common name of the food, unless the food is easily recognizable such as dry pasts. g. Staff receives training on the proper dry food storage time and temperature. j. Personnel look for and follow best before dates. They also honor Store in a cool dry place or keep in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not implement an effective Infection Control Program. The facility did not develop an effective Water Management Plan to prevent Legionella. The facility did not maintain accurate Surveillance of infections. This had the potential to effect all 48 residents residing in the facility. -The Water Management Plan did not identify areas of risk, surveillance process, control measures, monitoring, the review process along with identified staff responsible. -The facility did not have accurate data for an effective surveillance program to prevent the spread of infection. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Infection-Prevention-Water Management Program (Legionella) [name of facility] dated 6/23 was reviewed by Surveyor. The Protocol indicates: 1. Water Management Program Team-The water program is overseen by the team consisting of the Infection Preventionist, Maintenance Manger, Medical Director, Facility Administrator, Risk Manager or external…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility did not maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 2 elevators in the facility. The facility elevator, which is used by both ambulatory and wheelchair residents, was not in proper working order. While on survey, the doors to the elevator closed quickly, bumping into both Surveyor and residents, causing them to stumble and lose balance. Findings include: On 8/23/23 at 8:06 AM Surveyor noted the facility elevator (east/left side) was not working. Corporate Consultant-C reported parts have been on order for a couple of months. On 8/23/23 at 12:01 PM while entering the right (west) elevator, Surveyor turned to hold the door for an oncoming resident and visitor using a walker. The elevator door began to close abruptly, slamming into Surveyor's left side/back, causing her to stumble. Surveyor held the door open for the resident and visitor. While in the elevator, Surveyor asked if the door always closes that quickly and abruptly. The visitor reported it just started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not provide residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 12 (R48) residents residing in the facility. R48 was not provided an appropriate wheelchair to allow her to get out of bed while residing in the facility. Findings include: R48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include malignant neoplasm of endometrium, hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, morbid obesity, asthma, urinary incontinence, shortness of breath and weakness. On 8/22/23 at 10:45 AM during initial interview with R48, Surveyor observed her lying in bed, on her back with the head of bed elevated. R48's television was on and she was wearing a gown. Surveyor asked R48 if she gets dressed and out of bed. R48 stated: Not really, I don't have a wheelchair. They usually don't get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility did not provide residents the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 12 (R48) residents residing in the facility. R48 did not have an advanced directive or code status clearly indicated in the event of an emergency. Findings include: R48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include malignant neoplasm of endometrium, hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, morbid obesity, asthma, urinary incontinence, shortness of breath and weakness. The facility policy and procedure titled Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders dated revised 6/22 documents (in part) . Each resident will choose between CPR or DNR designation upon admission to the nursing home. 1. Upon admission, the licensed nurse or social worker will discuss the options, CPR or DNR and any other advance directives with the resident and/or legal representative, and receive the corresponding physician orders. The Physician Order Summary (POS) is the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure residents the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 1 (R3) of 12 sampled residents. R3 was missing paint on the wall behind the headboard of the bed and there was a large circular hole in the drywall. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled, Maintenance requests, dated 1/2023, states: Purpose: To provide a central location for all staff to inform maintenance staff of maintenance requests throughout the facility and for maintenance staff to check off and date items as repairs and/or upkeep is completed. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include traumatic brain injury, paraplegia, depression, and expressive language disorder. R3's Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] assesses R3 as having short- and long-term memory problems. On 08/22/23, at 10:23 AM, during the initial screen of residents, Surveyor entered R3's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property for 1 of two facility self-reports reviewed was reported to the State Agency within the required 24 hours. *R43 reported to the Activity Director (AD)-H on the afternoon of 6/10/23 that $40 was missing from R43's wallet. The facility started an investigation into the missing money to determine if the claim was credible before reporting this allegation to the State Agency until 6/12/23. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled, resident safety Abuse Policy, date revised 2/2022, states: Protocol: 3. REPORTING SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS: a. The supervisor on duty shall IMMEDIATELY safeguard the residents) and immediately report all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property to the facility administrator. The Administrator will notify the DON and/or others as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure all allegations of abuse, mistreatment, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 2 (R6 and R43) of 2 self-reports reviewed for abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property. The facility did not interview other residents to determine the scope of the potential allegations. * On 11/10/22 the facility was made aware of an alleged mistreatment and potential abuse of R6 by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-J. The allegation was that the CNA patted R6's buttock during cares and stated that the can of sardines in the room smelled like pussy. An investigation was started and residents were safeguarded from this CNA. R6 was interviewed and other staff. There is no documentation of other residents interviewed as part of the thorough investigation to determine the scope of the potential allegation. * On 6/10/23, R43 reported to the facility that $40 was missing from R43's wallet. The facility did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that instructions for ongoing care were provided to the receiving provider upon discharge and was not documented by a physician for 2 (R50 and R51) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. *R50 was transferred to the hospital on 7/2/2023 per family request. No transfer summary including the discharge summary was provided to the hospital and the physician did not document an order to have R50 transferred to the hospital. *R51 was discharged to another skilled nursing facility on 6/1/2023 per resident request. No transfer summary including the discharge summary was provided to the receiving facility and the physician did not document an order to have R51 transferred to another facility. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Transfer and Discharge Policy dated 10/2022 states: The facility will comply with regulations regarding initiating a transfer or discharge of a resident and the accompanying documentation that must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not develop a discharge plan involving the resident, resident's representative, and interdisciplinary team to develop goals of a discharge, document referrals to appropriate entities, revise the care plan to address the changing needs of the resident, and document the evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan for 1 (R51) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge. *R51 did not have any documentation in their medical record by any discipline of the desire to discharge to another skilled nursing facility. R51's Discharge Care Plan was not revised to incorporate R51's desire to discharge from the facility. No documentation was found that the facility assisted R51 in referring R51 to another skilled nursing facility. No documentation was found addressing an evaluation of R51's discharge needs. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Discharge Planning dated 10/2022 states: The facility will develop and implement an effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not develop a discharge summary to include a recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes the course of illness/treatment or therapy with a final summary of the resident's stay for 1 ( R51) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. *R51 was discharged from the facility on 6/1/2023 to another facility and there was no documented evidence a discharge summary was completed. Findings include: R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of right pubis fracture, electrolyte and fluid balance disorders, and atherosclerosis. R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R51 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 and the facility assessed R51 as needing supervision with bed mobility, eating, and hygiene, limited assistance with transfers, dressing, and toilet use, and extensive assistance with bathing. On 6/1/2023 at 9:22 AM in the progress notes, Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents' environment were free from accident hazards and residents received adequate supervision. This was observed with 1 (R15) of 1 residents reviewed for elopement and 1 (R49) of 1 water exceeding safe temperature range. - R15 has a Legal Guardian appointed and was found to have left the facility without staff knowledge or supervision. The local police department contacted the facility to inform them R15 was located at their prior community home. The facility staff was unaware R15 had left the facility until notified by the police. - R49's room hot water temperature was above the safe temperature range for use. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure, entitled: Resident Signing Out, dated 4/2023, documents: Purpose: All residents leaving the premises must be signed out to enable the facility to know the whereabouts of residents not on the premises. Protocol: Documenting in the medical record that a resident signing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident received an antibiotic per definitions of an infection. This was observed with 1 (R32) of 1 resident's reviewed on antibiotics. R32 was prescribed an antibiotic and did not have documentation to support it use. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 8/22, was reviewed by Surveyor. Section 9. Antibiotic Stewardship includes: antibiotic prescribing will include documentation of the dose, duration( indication and rationale) and treatment site; antibiotics will not be utilized in residents with asymptomatic bacteriuria by following the protocol urinary tract infection. On 08/22/23 at 11:03 AM Surveyor spoke with R32 in their room about antibiotic use. R32 indicated they have frequent UTI's (urinary tract infection). R32 indicated they go to see the Doctor for them. R32's medical record was reviewed by Surveyor. R32 's Physician Visit paperwork on 8/3/23 indicates Cipro 500 mg for 5 days for UTI. There is no additional clinical data to support the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents received specialized rehabilitative services of physical and occupational therapy that were ordered upon admisstion to the facilty for 1 (R48) of 1 residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. R48 did not receive therapy services as ordered upon admission to the facility. Findings include: R48 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include malignant neoplasm of endometrium, hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, morbid obesity, asthma, urinary incontinence, shortness of breath and weakness. R48's admission Physician's order dated 6/22/23 documented: PT (Physical Therapy)/OT (Occupational Therapy) eval (evaluate) and treat. R48's Physician's order dated 7/26/23 documented: PT order: PT evaluate and treat 3-5 times/week for 4 weeks to address therapeutic exercise, therapeutic activity, nm (neuromuscular) re-education, gait training, w/c (wheelchair) training, manual, group. On 8/22/23, at 10:45 AM during initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident received an antibiotic per definitions of an infection. This was observed with 1 (R32) of 1 resident's reviewed on antibiotics. R32 was prescribed an antibiotic and did not have documentation to support it use. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Infection Prevention and Control Program , revised 8/22, was reviewed by Surveyor. Section 9. Antibiotic Stewardship includes: antibiotic prescribing will include documentation of the dose, duration( indication and rationale) and treatment site; antibiotics will not be utilized in residents with asymptomatic bacteriuria by following the protocol urinary tract infection. 1.) On 08/22/23 at 11:03 AM Surveyor spoke with R32 in their room. R32 was queried regarding antibiotic use. R32 indicated they have frequent UTI'S (urinary tract infection). R32 indicated they go to see the Doctor for them. R32 medical record was reviewed by Surveyor. R32 Physician Visit paperwork on 8/3/23 indicates Cipro 500 mg for 5 days for UTI. There is no additional clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to REAL PROPERTY HEALTH FACILITIES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHRISTINA JAYNE PENN MANAGEMENT TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2010
PENN, CHRISTINAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2015
EGAN, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/16/2015
HAWORTH, ALBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
MARSH, DAWNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/15/1994
REAL PROPERTY HEALTH FACILITIES CORPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/1989
SMYTH, CHADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/16/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$586K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 5%Other / private 5%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $586K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$270per resident / day
operating cost
$8,211per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$302per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525431. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next