United Pioneer Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 44.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.42 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.02 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. The facility did not implement new interventions and increase supervision when needed to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents (R) (R1, R2) reviewed.-R1 is at risk for falls and fell on [DATE], 12/30/24, 01/01/25, 01/09/25, 05/13/25, 06/06/25, 08/04/25, 08/05/25, and the facility did not place new interventions or increase supervision to prevent further fall incidents. On 08/06/25, x-ray results revealed a left humeral head fracture. On 08/08/25, additional x-rays of left knee related to complaints of pain, revealed an acute transverse non-displaced fracture of the mid portion of the left patella. The facility failure to place new interventions and increase supervision for R1 led to harm, when R1 suffered a left humeral head fracture and an acute transverse non-displaced fracture of the mid portion of the left patella. This example is cited at a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner that prevents foodborne illness to the residents. This practice had the potential to affect all 40 residents within the facility.*Open food noted in cold storage, not labeled and dated.*Cook D did not have a hair net on mustache. Findings:Labeling open foods:The 2022 FDS Food Code documents at 3-501.18 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food: Disposition .A date marking system may be used which places information on the food, such as on an overwrap or on the food container, which identifies the first day of preparation, or alternatively, may identify the last day that the food may be sold or consumed on the premises. A date marking system may use calendar dates, days of the week, color coded marks, or other effective means, provided the system is disclosed to the Regulatory Authority upon request, during inspections.On 09/22/2025 at 8:33 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen, Dietary Director (DD) C provided Surveyor with a tour of the cold storage items.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure residents/representatives were notified of the rate to reserve the resident's bed in the bed hold notice. This has the potential to affect 2 of 5 residents R9 received bed hold notices with no daily rate documented and no information on resident appeal rights. R5 received bed hold notices with no daily rate documented and no information on resident appeal rights. R3's bed hold notices did not have daily rate documented and no information on resident appeal rights. R15 received a verbal bed hold notice, but facility did not have any documentation that R15 received the daily rate or information on resident appeal rights. R16 received a bed hold notice but it did not have the daily rate documented nor information on resident appeal rights. Findings: Example 1 R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15, which indicated that R9 was cognitively intact. R9 had diagnoses of dementia, chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This affected residents (R) R29, R41, R17, R16, R21, and R15. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G did not perform hand hygiene when passing water pitchers to R29, R41, R17, R16, and R21. CNA H did not perform hand hygiene when providing peri cares to R15. Maintenance F entered R16's droplet precaution room without donning PPE when cleaning R16's room. Findings include: The facility policy titled Transmission Based Precautions dated last review March 2025, in part reads: .Contact Precautions: #2. Wear gloves when entering room. Wear gown when contact with the resident or potentially contaminated surfaces in their environment will occur.Droplet Precautions: #2. In addition to contact precaution measures, a mask shall be donned when entering the room for contact within 6 feet for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. The facility did not use appropriate assist devices during transfer when needed to prevent accidents which affected resident (R) (R6).Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) H did not use gait belt while transferring R6 from toilet to wheelchair.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Fall Protocol, dated reviewed in February 2025, states in part: .Definition: A fall refers to unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level. An episode where resident lost his/her balance and would have fallen, if not for staff intervention, is considered a fall. Facility policy titled, Safe Resident Handling, dated reviewed in September 2017, states in part: .#5. Direct resident care staff will avoid manually lifting residents except for medical emergencies.#7. Suggested patient/resident handling aids: Minimal assist: The resident is ambulatory, able to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure standards of practice were followed for providing respiratory services for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for oxygen therapy (R15). Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) H did not check portable oxygen tank before taking R15 to lounge for an activity according to facility policy. The facility did not implement new respiratory interventions after each episode of R15 found with no oxygen on. Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the facility protocol titled Oxygen Therapy, last reviewed in April 2019, states in part, .initiating oxygen: 2. Turn on the oxygen to the prescribed flow rate. 3. Place appropriate oxygen to device on the resident (i.e., mask, nasal cannula and/or nasal catheter). 5. Check the mask, tank, humidifying jar, etc., to be sure they are in good working order and are securely fastened. 6. Observe the resident upon setup and periodically thereafter to be sure oxygen is being tolerated. R15 was re-admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for 1 of 12 residents (R12) reviewed for medication errors. R12 has a type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis. Facility staff administered short acting insulin 4 hours after Blood Glucose (BG) was taken. Facility staff did not follow standards of practice for insulin administration. Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the policy titled, Insulin Administration, dated reviewed in January 2017, which stated in part, .Insulin Pen: #2. Check blood glucose per physician order or facility protocol.On 09/23/25 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) I administer Humalog KwikPen 33 units subcutaneous in R12's left abdomen. RN I read out loud to Surveyor that R12's BG (blood glucose) was 173 and completed at 4:12 AM earlier this morning from night shift. RN I reported to Surveyor that R12 will receive sliding scale insulin as well. Surveyor observed RN I give Humalog insulin 33 units and head back to the medication cart. On 09/23/25 at 1:19 PM, Surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not implement Standard of Practice (SOP) for documentation of Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring with isolation precaution type, start date, and stop date. Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene with glove use during cares provided to R19 and R16. Findings: Example 1 The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention & Control Surveillance, with most recent review date 03/2024, states in part: The Infection Preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for HAIs and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions. .the Infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, the following elements: An antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to monitor/review antibiotic use. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not follow a Standard of Practice (SOP) for antibiotic stewardship for antibiotic use for residents on the line list logs from January 2024 through June 2024 line lists. The facility did not implement a SOP for antibiotic stewardship to monitor/review antibiotic usage, outcome measures, and summarizing of antibiotic resistance. The facility did not outline and implement a SOP for antibiotic stewardship concerning mode and frequency of education for prescribing providers and nursing staff on antibiotic use and protocols. R6 was prescribed Keflex for wound infection. Culture and sensitivity results did not indicate sensitivity to Keflex. The facility did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation into the abuse or protect from future incidents through education for Resident (R) 16. The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation into the abuse as other residents were not interviewed to determine if other residents were affected. The facility did not protect residents from future incidents as education was not provided to staff after this incident occurred. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Resident Abuse Prevention and Reporting revised 01/2017, states in part: 7. Investigation/Reporting Procedures for actual or suspected abuse/neglect: . i) Plan for interviews of staff and residents as appropriate . k) Depending on the results of the investigation: Corrective actions will be taken to prevent abuse/neglect which may include discipline up to and including terminations, additional education, care plan or policy change. R16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was documented accurately related to tube feeding for 2 (R2 and R11) of 13 residents reviewed for MDS resident assessments. Findings include: Example 1: Review of R2's care plan, orders, diagnosis, and progress notes did not indicate R2 received tube feedings while a resident in the facility. Review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR) annual MDS comprehensive resident assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/27/24, documented in section K: Swallowing / Nutritional Status K0520 B, R2 was receiving tube feeding while a resident. The documentation indicated the response was locked and signed on 06/28/24 at 4:47 PM. On 07/08/24 at 6:45 PM, Surveyor completed initial tour of facility and observed R2 was not receiving tube feeding services. Example 2: A review of R11's care plan, orders, diagnosis, and progress notes did not indicate R11 received tube feedings while a resident in the facility. A review of R11's EMR annual MDS comprehensive resident assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-26 for 21 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI