Oak Park Nursing And Rehab Center
718 Jupiter Drive, Madison, WI 53718 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (608) 663-8600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $67,410 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-10)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.5% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.8% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.9% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.2% | 16.9% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.0% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.2% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.8% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.66 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 2.29 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 415 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 203 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.1%CMS range 47.1–57.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 10.3–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 4.2–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents. The facility failed to ensure adequate infection control processes were followed to ensure containment of Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and COVID during a concurrent facility outbreak of all three infections. This failure created the potential for all residents, staff, and visitors to the facility to become infected with one or more of these viruses, potentially leading to serious illness, hospitalization, and or/death, thus leading to a finding of immediate jeopardy. The facility's Administrator and Regional Nurse Consultant were informed on 01/09/26 at 4:45 PM that Immediate Jeopardy existed at F880 (Infection Control) related to the failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2026-01-10 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to designate a qualified infection preventionist (IP) to develop, implement, and monitor the facility's infection prevention program. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents residing at the facility.The facility failed to monitor residents and staff with signs and symptoms of an acute respiratory illness and protect residents and staff from contracting an acute respiratory illness during a concurrent outbreak of influenza, RSV and COVID in January 2026 The facility's failure to have an infection preventionist who developed, implemented and monitored infectious illnesses placed 70 of 70 residents and facility staff at risk for development of an infectious illness which could result in serious harm and/or death, thus leading to a finding of immediate jeopardy. The facility's Administrator and Regional Nurse Consultant were informed on 01/09/26 at 4:45 PM that Immediate Jeopardy existed at F882 (Infection Preventionist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) for 1 out of 19 residents (R74) reviewed for change of condition.R74 had orders to update the physician with pulse greater than 119. R74 had a pulse of 140 and the facility did not complete a nursing assessment, recheck the pulse, consult with the physician, or complete ongoing monitoring of R74. R74 was found pulseless and non-breathing. The facility's failure to recognize a change in condition and perform a thorough nursing assessment along with ongoing assessments and monitoring of a resident created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Surveyor notified the NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:03 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE]; however, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity of D (potential for more than minimal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (R48) and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision (R37). R48 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R48 sustained three falls. The facility failed to identify a root cause analysis (RCA) or patterns with R48's three falls. Without identifying the RCA, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) did not implement resident specific interventions or identify patterns which could have contributed to her falls and/or prevent future falls, such as a plan to anticipate her toileting needs when she stated she was trying to go to the bathroom. R48 was found to have a C1 fracture (a break in the first vertebra or the cervical spine, located at the base of the skull) and left seventh rib fracture after the second fall. R48's third fall resulted in a closed fracture of her right femur. There was no evidence of an RN assessment prior to R48 being moved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries (PI) from developing or worsening for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for PIs (R68 and R66.) R68 was admitted to the facility with a stage 2 PI on his spine. The facility did not complete weekly wound assessments and measurements and R68's PI worsened. The facility did not ensure an initial assessment, weekly measurements, and interventions were in place to prevent the PI from developing or worsening for R66's left buttock pressure injury. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled, Pressure Injuries Overview last revised March 2020, states in part, .Pressure Ulcer/ Injury (PU/PI) refers to localized damage to the skin and/ or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device .Debridement is the removal of devitalized/ necrotic tissue and foreign matter from a wound to improve or facilitate the healing process . Eschar is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical needs for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R1).R1's surgical dressing was not monitored or assessed. R1's surgical wound was not care planned.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol, dated 3/18, includes: 5. The physician and nursing staff will review the details of any recent hospitalization and will identify complications and problems that occurred during the hospital stay that may indicate instability or the risk of having additional complications. 1. The staff will monitor and document the resident/patient's progress and responses to treatment.The facility's policy Charting and Documentation, dated 7/17, includes: All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R1). R1 had multiple wounds on his feet with physician orders for dressing changes and treatment. These treatments were not completed on the AM (morning) shift of 1/18/26. This is evidenced by:The facility policy entitled, Wound Care, dated October 2010, states, in part: . Documentation. The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record. 2. The date and time the wound care was given. 9. If the resident refused the treatment and the reason(s) why. 10. The signature and title of the person recording the data.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy (nerve damage in multiple sites), neutropenia (low white blood cell count, which are cells that fight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were disposed of in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 residents (R2) observed. Surveyor observed R2 in their wheelchair with a nitroglycerin patch stuck to the wheel. R2 does not have an order for a nitroglycerin patch.Evidenced by:According to Enokon article titled How Should a Nitroglycerin Patch Be Disposed of? A Step-By-Step Safety Guide dated 12/2025 states in part .The Step-by-Step Removal and Disposal ProcessFollowing a precise procedure for removing your nitroglycerin patch is essential for safety and consistent treatment. Each step is designed to protect you and others from unintended contact with this potent medication.Step 1: Peel the Patch from the SkinPress down on the center of the patch with one finger. This action should cause the outer edges to lift slightly, making it easier to grab. Gently peel the patch away from your skin.Step 2: Fold and Neutralize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect 2 of 22 sampled residents' (R2 and R3) right to be free from verbal abuse by a Registered Nurse (RN1). RN1 referred to R2 as a (drug) addict and told R3 to Stop your damn crying while administering the resident's eye drops. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Prevention Program Policy dated most recently revised in 04/2021 read, in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation; and The resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: a facility staff;. 1.Review of R2's admission Record, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse.The facility did not implement their Abuse policy when the facility was made aware R1 was verbally abused by a family member. The facility did not put interventions in place to prevent further abuse, the facility did not report nor investigate the allegation of abuse.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, dated 4/21, includes: Residents have the right to be free from abuse. This includes but is not limited to freedom from .verbal.abuse. 1. Protect residents from abuse.by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: f. family members; 2. Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify: a. abuse or mistreatment of residents; 8. Identify and investigate all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the appropriate agencies for 1 of 1 abuse allegations involving a resident (R1).On 10/22/25, an allegation of verbal abuse toward R1 from a family member was reported to the facility and the facility did not report the allegation of abuse.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, dated 4/21, includes: Residents have the right to be free from abuse. This includes but is not limited to freedom from .verbal.abuse. 1. Protect residents from abuse.by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: f. family members; 2. Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify: a. abuse or mistreatment of residents; 8. Identify and investigate all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the administrator and other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse.On 10/22/25, an allegation of verbal abuse toward R1 from a family member was reported to the facility and the facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, dated 4/21, includes: Residents have the right to be free from abuse. This includes but is not limited to freedom from .verbal.abuse. 1. Protect residents from abuse.by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: f. family members; 2. Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify: a. abuse or mistreatment of residents; 8. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse. 9. Investigate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect 67 of 68 residents.Surveyor observed food that was not sealed or labeled with a use by date in the main kitchen freezer.Surveyor observed food that was not labeled or dated in a kitchenette refrigerator.Surveyor observed microwaves in the three kitchenettes to have several multi-colored dried on splatters and stains on the inside microwaves.The refrigerator and freezer temperatures in two of the kitchenettes are not being consistently monitored or recorded.Evidenced by:Example - Unsealed and unlabeled packages of food in main kitchen freezerFacility policy entitled, Food Receiving and Storage with a revision date of April 2019 states, in part: .8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ( use by date) .On 8/20/25 at 9:24 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, Surveyor and DM J (Dietary Manager) observed an opened bag of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents. Three staff members returned to work too soon after experiencing gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. The facility's infection control line lists for staff and residents are incomplete and inaccurate. The facility did not ensure daily infection control surveillance for staff and residents. The facility failed to recognize commonalities with staff who called in with similar symptoms in February 2025 and did not rule out a GI or COVID-19 outbreak. The facility did not perform testing, per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, after a resident tested positive for COVID-19 at the facility in February 2025. The facility had COVID-19 outbreaks in February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment or ensure housekeeping provided necessary services to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable area for 3 of 22 sampled residents (R33, R37, and R47), 4 supplemental residents (R57, R76, R26, R30) and 1 of 4 units.R33 and R26 voiced concerns related to the cleanliness of the unit.Surveyor observed R33's, R37's, R57's, R76's, and R30's rooms to be unclean with dirt and debris build up in the corners, urine dried around floor and bottom of toilet, and food and paper particles spattered on floor throughout room.Surveyor and staff observed dried dripping substance on the walls and the ceiling, dirt and debris gathered in the corners, in the windowsills, along the baseboards, and behind doors in the hallways of the unit, in the activity room, and in the dining room.Surveyor observed R47's wheelchair armrest to have the padding and leather/plastic covering to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment information accurately reflected resident's status for 3 residents (R) of 19 sampled residents (R8, R23, R37) and 1 supplemental resident (R48).R8's, R23's, R37's, and R48's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments have conflicting data and are inaccurate as section C indicates they are rarely or never understood, while section B indicates they are understood, have clear speech, and make themselves understood by others.R48's MDS indicates she discharged with return anticipated and that she had a fall with major injury. R48's emergency department notes indicate she had a fall with fracture. Her reentry assessment indicates she did not have a fall with major injury.Evidenced by:The facility did not provide a policy related to the completion of resident MDS.Example 1R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] Type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives food and drink that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This has the potential to affect 4 (R82, R51, R3 and R1) of 19 sampled residents and residents eating in 1 of 3 dining rooms (10 residents out of a census of 68). R82 and R51 voiced concerns with hot foods not being hot. R3 and R1 voiced concerns regarding food temperatures. Surveyor conducted 1 test tray for the dining room which was not palatable. Evidenced by: Example 1 On 8/20/25 at 2:38 PM, Surveyor interviewed R82 during the initial screening process. During the interview R82 was asked if there were any concerns with meals. R82 indicated about 5 times a week the food is dry, tasteless, has no spices and the hot foods are not hot. Example 2 On 8/21/25 at 9:16 AM, Surveyor interviewed R51 during the initial screening process. During the interview R51 was asked if there were any concerns with meals. R51 indicated that about 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that residents were ensured a dignified existence and self-determination for 2 of 17 sampled residents (R45 and R37). R45 voiced concerns that his catheter bag was not covered, including when he went to the dining room for meals. R37's wheelchair was observed to be dirty and undignified. As evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 2001, states, in part: .Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. a dignified existence; b. to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. e. self-determination. h. be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights. The facility policy titled, Dignity, dated 2001, states, in part: Policy Statement: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not document a thorough investigation and did not resolve grievances as outlined in the facility policy for 1 of 1 Residents (R2) reviewed for grievances. R2 had voiced a concern to a staff member and the facility failed to follow their grievance policy by thoroughly investigating, following up, and documenting the concern.Evidenced by: The facility policy, Grievances/Complaints, Recording and Investigating indicates, in part: Policy Statement: All grievances and complaints filed with the facility will be investigated and corrective actions will be taken to resolve the grievance(s). Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The administrator has assigned the responsibility of investigating grievances and complaints to the grievance officer. 2. Upon receiving a grievance and complaint report, the grievance officer will begin an investigation into the allegations.4. The investigation and report will include, as applicable: a. the date and time of the alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving misappropriation of resident funds/personal property are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility, the State agency, and to other officials, including local law enforcement, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 22 sampled residents (R48) reviewed for abuse. The facility did not report allegations of abuse to the state agency in accordance with facility policy and federal regulations for an incident involving R48.Evidenced by:Facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, revised 9/2022, includes, in part: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and residents are protected pending a thorough investigation for 1 of 22 residents reviewed (R48). The facility did not thoroughly investigate R48's allegations of abuse by a staff member. The facility did not remove the alleged staff from patient care to protect residents while conducting a thorough investigation.Evidenced by:Facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, revised 9/2022, includes, in part: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide the proper discharge documentation for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge (R2, R5, and R73). R2 was transferred to the hospital, and no bed hold notice was provided. R5 was not provided a bed hold. R73 was transferred to the hospital, and no bed hold notice was provided. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Bed-Holds and Returns includes, in part: Policy Statement: Residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which addresses holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Resident's, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: a. notice 1: well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who requires dialysis receives such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R1) reviewed for dialysis.The facility failed to provide ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. The facility staff were not fluent in the emergency plan for a resident bleeding from their dialysis fistula site.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Hemodialysis Catheters - Access and Care Of, dated 2001, with a Revision Date of February 2023, states, in part: . Care of Arterio-venous fistula (AVF)s. 4. To prevent infection and/or clotting: a. Keep the access site clean at all times. d. Check for signs of infection (Warmth, redness, tenderness or edema) at the access site when performing routine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 2 errors in 28 opportunities that affected 2 out of 6 residents (R53 & R16) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 7.14%. R53 received Lasix (Furosemide) 10 mg tablet outside of the medication administration window. R16 received Metoprolol Extended Release (ER) 25 mg tablet that had been crushed. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Administering Medications, dated 2001, states, in part: Policy Statement: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 7. Medications are administered withing one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. Example 1 R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are free of significant medication errors, for 1 of 6 residents reviewed in the medication administration task (R16).R16 received a Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release (ER) 25 mg tablet (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and chest pain) that had been crushed.This is evidenced by:The facility policy, Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, revised in February 2023, states in part, .Medication Errors - 1. A 'medication error' is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional(s) providing services. 2. Examples of medications errors include: .h. Failure to follow manufacturer's instructions and/or accepted professional standards (e.g.crushing a medication on the 'do not crush list' without an order).R16 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals are stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. The medication room on the first floor contained an expired single-dose COVID vaccine and 4 urinary catheter kits that were expired. This is evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Medication Labeling and Storage with a revision date of February 2023 states, in part. Medication Storage.3. If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. On [DATE] at 10:36 AM, Surveyor conducted medication storage observation of the medication room on the first floor with RN P (Registered Nurse). Surveyor found a Spikevax single-dose COVID vaccine in the medication room refrigerator with an expiration date of [DATE] and 4 urinary catheter insertion tray kits in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure snacks were offered at bedtime daily when there is more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast for 1 resident (R3) of total census of 68 reviewed for snacks.R3 voiced concerns of snacks not being offered at bedtime.The facility is not offering all residents nourishing snacks at bedtime when their supper meal and breakfast meal are more than 14 hours apart.Evidenced by:Facility policy, titled Frequency of Meals, dated 2001, states, in part: . Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The facility will serve at least three (3) meals or their equivalent daily at scheduled times. There will not be more than a fourteen (14) hour span between the evening meal and breakfast. 5. Nourishing snacks will be available for the residents who need or desire additional food between meals. 6. Evening snacks will be offered routinely to all residents. 7. Residents will also be offered nourishing snacks if the time span between the evening meal and the next day's breakfast exceeds fourteen (14)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: (A) That the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization; and (B) That the resident either received the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal. This affected 1 of 5 residents (R33) reviewed for immunizations.R33 signed a consent form to receive the 2024-2025 influenza vaccine but never received it.This is evidenced by:The facility policy entitled Influenza Vaccine, with a revision date of March 2022, states in part: Policy Statement: All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccines against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 Resident (R1) of 6 observed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and 1 (R1) of 8 opportunities for hand hygiene. Staff did not apply PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) appropriately while completing a treatment to R1 who was on EBP. Staff did not perform hand hygiene for appropriate amount of time during treatment. The facility policy entitled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated October 2023, states, in part: . Policy Statement: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation Administrative Practices to Promote Hand Hygiene: 1. All personnel are trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment or ensure housekeeping provided necessary services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable area for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for homelike environment out of a total sample of 17 residents (R31). R31 voiced concerns related to the cleanliness of her room. Evidenced by: Resident Handbook, revised 6/8/08, includes: the facilities housekeeping staff will clean and mop resident rooms daily or more often as needed to ensure a clean, safe, and home-like environment. The facility reserves the right to clean any area or room and to remove items that prevent us safe and sanitary environment. Periodically the housekeeping department will do seasonal cleaning and floor care in resident rooms . Facility policy, entitled, Facility Resident Room Cleaning Procedure, undated, includes Wipe down with Fuzion: telephone, bedside tables, doorknobs, light switches, call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 5 residents (R9 and R42) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility did not develop a care plan for R9 and R42's use of Melatonin (a medication used to help with sleep) for insomnia. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, states in part: .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .Identifying problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident .Care plan interventions are chosen only after careful data gathering, proper sequencing of events,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (R7 and R12) of 5 residents reviewed with non-pressure injuries. *R7 had non-pressure injuries to the left distal shin, the left dorsal foot, and the left calf. The wounds were not comprehensively assessed weekly and the facility documentation for the location and etiology of the non-pressure injuries were not consistent with the Wound Physician. * R12 developed a non-pressure injury to the right buttock on 7/8/2024 that was not comprehensively assessed until 7/12/2024 when R12 was seen by the Wound Physician. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol dated 3/2014 documents: Assessment and Recognition: 1. The nursing staff and Attending Physician will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure sores, for example…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (R7 and R12) of 3 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. *R7 had a Stage 4 pressure injury to the left heel, a Stage 4 pressure injury to the left lateral foot, and a Stage 3 pressure injury to the left first toe. The wounds were not comprehensively assessed weekly and the facility documentation for the staging of the pressure injuries were not consistent with the staging by the Wound Physician. *R12 developed a Stage 2 pressure injury to the sacrum on 5/24/2024 that was not comprehensively assessed until 5/31/2024 when R12 was seen by the Wound Physician. The facility documentation for the wound indicated the wound was moisture associated skin damage (MASD) and did not correlate with the Wound Physician documenting the etiology of the wound being pressure. The pressure injury was not comprehensively assessed weekly.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed out of a sample of 17 residents. R5 was assessed to be at risk for falls with care plan interventions of a low bed and fall mat while in bed. The facility did not ensure interventions were in place when R5 was in bed. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes, dated March 2018, states in part: .4. Residents must be assessed upon admission and regularly afterward for potential risk of falls. Relevant risk factors must be addressed promptly .the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: .6. Appropriate interventions take to prevent future falls. The facility policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, states in part: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes, measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents that use psychotropic drugs have appropriate assessments, diagnoses, and consent. This affected 2 of 5 residents (R9 and R42) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R9 receives an antipsychotic for dementia. R42 receives an antipsychotic for anxiety. R42 is receiving an antidepressant and does not have active consent. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated July 2022, states in part: Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition .Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: a. anti-psychotics; b. anti-depressants; c. anti-anxiety medications; and d. hypnotics .are not prescribed or given these medications unless the medication is determined to be necessary to treat a specific condition that is diagnosed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for significant medication errors (R1). On 3/4/24, the facility received orders for R1 to receive Humalog sliding scale insulin. This order did not specify the frequency of administration. Two Registered Nurses (RN's) signed off on the order, but did not clarify how frequently the insulin was to be administered. Facility staff entered to administer the Humalog four times daily on R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) without a clarification order from R1's physician. Additionally, R1 did not receive the Humalog insulin as ordered on 3/4/24, 3/5/24, 3/6/24, and 3/7/24. This is evidenced by: R1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: diabetes mellitus type 2, morbid obesity, polymyalgia rheumatica (inflammatory disorder that primarily affects the shoulders and hips), major depressive disorder, anxiety, and asthma. R1's February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that all alleged violation involving neglect are reported immediately to the State Survey Agency for 1 resident (R1) of 3 reviewed of a total sample of 6 residents. The facility failed to immediately report an allegation of neglect to the State Survey Agency. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, with a revision date of 9/22, states, in part: All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Policy Interpretation and Implementation Reporting Allegations to the Administrator and Authorities 1. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect for 1 (R1) of 3 sampled Residents. The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into R1 allegation. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Identifying Types of Abuse, with a revision date of 9/22, states, in part: . 'Abuse' is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. a. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, or goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, with a revision date of 9/22, states, in part: 7. The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum: a. reviews the documentation and evidence; b. reviews the resident's medical record to determine the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of pharmaceutical services including administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 out of 3 sampled residents (R1 and R4). R1 did not receive his medications in a timely manner, resulting in several medication errors. R4 did not receive her medications in a timely manner, resulting in several medication errors. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Administering Medications last revised April 2019, states in part .4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 5. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that are considered include: a. enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication; b. preventing potential medication or food interactions; and c. honoring resident choices and preferences, consistent with his or her care plan .7. Medications are administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment or ensure housekeeping provided necessary services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable area for 4 (R57, R10, R17, and R27) of 25 residents R10 and R27 voiced concerns with the cleanliness of bedrooms. Surveyor observed concerns with cleanliness for R57, R10, R17, and R27's bedrooms. Evidenced by: The facility did not provide a housekeeping policy. Example 1: R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty in walking, kidney failure, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. R57's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/29/23, indicates R57 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R57 has an Activated Health Care Power of Attorney. On 4/11/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal hygiene for 5 of 19 residents (R25, R48, R57, R66, and R68) reviewed for ADLs. R66 had long facial hair and long toenails that are thick and discolored. R66 requires assistance with shaving and nailcare. R25 had long facial hair and requires assistance with ADLs. R48 was not provided assistance with eating and requires assistance. R68 had long nails and nail care had not been provided R57 Surveyor observed R57 not receive assistance with eating meals. Surveyor observed R57's fingernails long with a dark substance underneath fingernails. This is evidenced by: The Facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, with a revised date of March 2018, states, in part: Policy Statement: .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide an ongoing, individualized, and meaningful program to support the residents in their choice of activities, which was designed to meet their interests and support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected 3 (R5, R10, and R57) of 19 sampled residents and 1 of 1 (R3) supplemental residents reviewed for activity participation. The facility failed to offer a variety of activities that meet the interests and support all residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to ensure resident's activity care plans were personalized to meet the needs of residents physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to create personalized goals and develop a tracking/monitoring system for resident's activity attendance. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Activity Programs with a revised date of June 2018, states, in part, Policy Statement Activity programs are designed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) not less frequently than once every 3 months for 1 of 19 sampled residents (R38). R38 did not have a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed. This is evidenced by: Per R38's MDS record, she had assessments completed on the following dates: 3/11/22 Quarterly 6/11/22 Quarterly 8/30/22 Quarterly 11/30/22 Annual R38 was due for a Quarterly assessment end of February 2023 or beginning of March 2023. There were no completed or in progress assessments noted in R38's medical record. With R38's Quarterly assessment not being done, the facility could have missed critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status. Due to R38's assessment not being completed the care plan was not reviewed either. On 4/13/23 at 9:14 AM, Surveyor interviewed RMDSC I (Regional MDS Coordinator). Surveyor asked RMDSC I what the process is for MDS completion; RMDSC I explained that herself and two other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$67,410 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $67,410 — penalty dated 2026-01-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-10 for 17 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BERNSTEIN, GREGORY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/05/2013 |
| CHASE, BYRON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 9% | since 11/05/2013 |
| CHASE, THEODORE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 14% | since 11/05/2013 |
| HALFORD, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 9% | since 11/05/2013 |
| SADLER, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 11/05/2013 |
| FRANK, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/29/2006 |
| AHMAD, FARID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/26/2025 |
| BALOUSEK, REBECCA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/26/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525266. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.