Luther Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 59.4 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 4 residents in a total sample of 8 residents.Staff witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)2 be verbally abusive to R4.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prevention and Reporting Policies and Procedures, reviewed September 2024, revealed: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish .Causes could reasonably be expected to cause mental or emotional damage to a client, including harm to client's psychologic or intellectual functioning that is exhibited by anxiety, depression, withdrawal, regression, outward aggressive behavior, agitation, or fear of harm or death, or a combination of these behaviors. Review of the Face Sheet tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R4 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 residents (R) of the 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were implemented for R53 for Norovirus (The most common cause of gastroenteritis, characterized by non-bloody diarrhea, vomiting, and stomach pain. The virus is highly contagious and spread through contaminated food or water or person-to-person contact, contaminated surfaces, or through air from the vomit of an infected person.) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-K did not complete appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration.Housekeeper (HK)-G did not use appropriate disinfecting solution to mop residents' floors on a unit with a Norovirus outbreak. In addition, the housekeeping department did not have a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R8) of 1 sampled resident with a Guardian was protectively placed at the facility. R8 had a legal Guardian at the time of admission on [DATE]. R8's medical record included an order for Guardianship of person and estate dated 9/21/22. R8's medial record did not contain an order for protective placement.Findings include:State Statute Chapter 55.03(4) indicates: The law requires a court-ordered protective placement for any resident admitted to a nursing home who has a legal Guardian and whose nursing home stay exceeds sixty days, only to be extended with court approval (State Statute Chapter 55.05(b)). Protective placement is reviewed annually (State Statute Chapter 55.18) to determine if placement continues to be least restrictive and in the best interest of the individual.On 12/8/25, Surveyor reviewed R8's medical record. R8 had diagnoses including schizophrenia, seizure disorder, and anxiety disorder. R8's Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R2 and R22) of 2 sampled residents were provided a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form which is used to inform residents of the potential liability for payment (daily cost of care and services at the facility).The facility did not provide an ABN form to R2 when R2's Medicare Part A benefits ended on 10/10/25 and R2 remained in the facility. The facility did not provide an ABN form to R22 and when R22's Medicare Part A benefits ended on 11/25/25 and R22 remained in the facility. Findings include:The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-10055 Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) form indicates: The ABN provides information to the beneficiary so the beneficiary can decide whether or not to get the care that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility .The ABN is only issued if the beneficiary intends to continue services and the skilled nursing facility believes the services may not be covered under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents was free from abuse.The facility was aware of verbal abuse directed at R2 by R2's activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) on 10/16/25. An investigation was not completed and the facility did not implement measures to protect R2 from future abuse. A second occurrence of verbal abuse directed at R2 by POAHC-M occurred on 12/8/25. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prevention and Reporting Policies and Procedures, revised June 2025, indicates: .You as an individual employee have a moral and legal responsibility to make sure each resident is free from abuse. The Administration of this facility takes very serious this duty. Abuse, in general, is any act that inflicts physical, emotional, or mental harm upon a resident .abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish From 12/8/25 to 12/10/25, Surveyor reviewed R2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents. On 10/16/25, the facility was informed of an allegation of verbal abuse toward R2 by R2's activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). The allegation of abuse was not reported to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prevention and Reporting Policies and Procedures, revised June 2025, indicates: .Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .Reporting Abuse: It is the responsibility of our employees, attending physicians, family members, visitors, volunteers, contractors, etc., to immediately report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or physical or verbal resident abuse .to the Administrator or his/her designee Immediately means upon witnessing an incident or as soon as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 3 sampled residents. On 10/16/25, the facility became aware of an allegation of verbal abuse toward R2 by R2's activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). The allegation of abuse was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prevention and Reporting Policies and Procedures, revised June 2025, indicates: .All reports of resident abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown source shall be immediately and thoroughly investigated .1. Should an incident or suspected incident of abuse, neglect, or injury of an unknown source be reported, the Administrator and/or his/her designee will investigate the alleged incident. 2. The individual(s) conducting the investigation will, at a minimum, and when necessary: a. Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; b. Interview the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) services for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 24 sampled residents. The facility did not contact the state mental health authority to pursue PASRR Level I or II screening for R8 who had a mental illness diagnosis.Findings include:The facility's Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASRR Program policy, revised June 2023, indicates: The facility coordinates assessments with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program under Medicaid to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort. All individuals with a mental disorder or intellectual disability who apply for admission to the facility will be screened in accordance with the state's Medicaid rules for screening. The facility will only admit individuals with a mental disorder or intellectual disability who the state mental health or intellectual disability authority has determined as appropriate for admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 22 sampled residents. The facility did not accurately document and treat R1's injured right ankle after R1 was lowered to the ground on 11/16/25. Findings include: The facility's Falls: Prevention/Management/Documentation policy, dated January 2009, indicates: .Successful management of falls includes a variety of facility-wide and individual approaches in order to reduce the risk for falls and fall-related injuries to the residents of this facility .A fall occurs whenever unplanned movement from a higher level to a lower level occurs. This includes lowering a resident to the floor to prevent injury from an uncontrolled downward movement .5. All falls will be recorded on the 24-hour report board and follow-up assessment will continue for three shifts. Follow-up will include: vital signs, check for injury, and changes in range of motion or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 resident (R) (R41) of 22 sampled residents.The facility did not ensure R41's Average Volume Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS) machine was in working condition and did not follow orders to apply R41's AVAPS machine while sleeping.Findings include:The [NAME] Medical (which makes R41's AVAPS model - [NAME] LM150TD) User Guide indicates: .2.1.1 c. Always keep an alternative means of ventilation available in order to avoid life threatening situations if the device fails .According to Zimnoch et al. in the Journal of Clinical Medicine an article on Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV), published [DATE]: Non-invasive ventilation modalities such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), and AVAPS are a cornerstone in the management of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Inappropriate discontinuation or lack of NIV support when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $265K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI