Oakridge Gardens Nur Ctr, Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 21.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 60.9 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.46 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.76 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-05-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who was a certified dietary manager, a certified food service manager, had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body, or who had an associates or higher level degree in food service management or hospitality. This practice had the potential to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility. Dietary Manager (DM)-F was not enrolled in an approved Dietary Manager training course. Findings include: On 5/12/25 at 8:34 AM, Surveyor interviewed [NAME] (CK)-E who indicated Dietary Manager (DM)-F oversaw the kitchen but was on vacation. CK-E indicated Registered Dietitian (RD)-G was at the facility once weekly on Wednesdays. Surveyor requested DM-F's certification and was provided with a copy of a ServSafe Food Protection Manager Certification that was completed on 2/18/22 but is not an approved Dietary Manager course. On 5/13/25, Surveyor requested further certification such as a Dietary Manager or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications for 3 residents (R) (R270, R62, and R57) in 3 of 6 medication carts were labeled and/or dated appropriately and that expired medical supplies were removed from storage. In addition, the facility did not ensure expired supplies were removed from storage in 2 of 4 medication storage areas. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 66 residents residing in the facility. Medication carts contained open, unlabeled and undated inhalers, eye drops, and nasal sprays and expired medical supplies. Medication storage areas contained expired items. Findings include: The facility's Specific Medication Administration Procedures IIB1: Administration Procedures for all Medications, revised 1/2018, indicates: .D. Check expiration date on package/container . On [DATE] at 11:05 AM, Surveyor observed the [NAME] Rehab medication cart and noted the following: ~ One Tegaderm film 1622W dressing with an expiration date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 66 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not ensure food was dated/stored in a manner to ensure food safety. Findings include: Food Labeling/Storage: The facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy, dated 4/4/25, indicates: Food shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .Dry Storage: .4. Dry foods that are stored in bins and removed from the original packaging, labeled, and dated (use-by date) .Refrigerated/Frozen Storage: 1. All foods in the refrigerator or freezer is covered, labeled, and dated (use-by date). The 2022 Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code documents at 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food (TCS), Date Marking: (A) Except when packaging food using a reduced oxygen packaging method as specified under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 66 residents residing in the facility. Staff line lists did not contain last symptom dates or times and/or return to work dates for 14 staff. In addition, the facility allowed 7 staff with gastrointestinal (GI) illness symptoms to return to work earlier than recommended per the facility's policy and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. The facility also allowed 1 staff who tested positive for influenza to return to work earlier than recommended per the facility's policy. R172 was on contact precautions. On 5/12/25, Physical Therapist (PT)-H provided care in R172's room without a gown and gloves. Staff did not sanitize the vitals machine after use for R33. The facility did not ensure R268 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 residents (R) (R50 and R57) of 23 sampled residents had the appropriate signatures on their Emergency Care Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNR) forms (Department of Health Services (DHS) Division of Public Health F-44763) thus rendering the DNR orders invalid. R50 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). R50's DNR form was not signed by R50 or R50's POAHC. R57's DNR form was not signed by R57 or R57's POAHC. Findings include: Chapter 155.05(2) Wisconsin Statute indicates: .(2) Unless otherwise specified in the power of attorney for healthcare instrument, an individual's power of attorney for healthcare takes effect upon a finding of incapacity by 2 physicians, as defined in s. 448.01 (5), or one physician and one licensed psychologist as defined in s. 445.01 (4) who personally examine the principal and sign a statement specifying that the principal has incapacity. The statute also indicates: A copy of the statement, if made,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data was transmitted timely for 3 residents (R) (R16, R175, and R174) of 3 sampled residents. R16 and R175s' Discharge MDS assessments were not completed or submitted. R174's Discharge MDS assessment was not submitted. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.18.1, dated 10/2023, indicates: All Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing homes must complete and transmit required Minimum Data Set (MDS) records to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS') Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system. Required MDS records include: Admission, Quarterly, Annual, Discharge Assessments, Death, and Entry Tracking records .Comprehensive MDS assessments include: Admission, Annual, Significant Change .The MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not follow the plan of care during a transfer for 1 resident (R) (R45) of 2 sampled residents. R45 had a history of falls. R45's plan of care contained an intervention to use a gait belt and a 2-wheeled walker during transfers. On 5/12/25, staff transferred R45 without a gait belt or 2-wheeled walker. Findings include: The facility's Safe Program Lifting and Movement of Residents policy, revised 7/2017, indicates: In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents .2. Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible .4. Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait/transfer belts, lateral boards) and mechanical lifting devices. On 5/12/25, Surveyor reviewed R45's medical record. R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. During medication administration, Surveyor observed 4 errors out of 27 opportunities which resulted in an error rate of 14.81%. This affected 3 residents (R) (R36, R172, and R33) of 5 residents observed during medication administration Staff did not ensure intravenous (IV) medications were administered within the scheduled time frame for R36 and R172. Staff did not ensure R33's blood pressure was within the ordered parameters prior to administering medication. Findings include: The facility's Specific Medication Administration Procedures IIB2: Oral Medication Administration policy, revised 1/2018, indicates: .Review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) prior to administering medications to each resident. Review Medication Administration Record for any test or vital signs that need to be determined prior to preparing the medications . The facility's Specific Medication Administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R1) of 2 sampled residents. R2 reported an allegation of physical abuse on 1/19/25 that involved Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E. The facility did not ensure CNA-E was removed from or supervised during resident care pending the results of the investigation. R1 reported to a nurse on 11/29/24 that R1 was recently raped by an unknown male staff. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of sexual abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, dated 9/3/24, indicates: Investigating Allegations: 1. All allegations are thoroughly investigated .7. The individual conducting the investigation at a minimum: a. Reviews the documentation and evidence. b. Reviews the resident's medical record to determine the resident's physical and cognitive status at the time of the incident and since the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 73 of 73 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not date items with open dates and received dates. Staff did not ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner. Staff did not wash hands when moving from dirty to clean activities. Staff did not wait two minutes to take microwave reheated food temperatures to ensure food was heated evenly. In addition, staff did not ensure microwaved foods reached the food safety temperature prior to serving. Findings include: Undated Items: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022 documents at 3-501.18 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Disposition (A): A food specified in 3-501.17 (A) or (B) shall be discarded if it: (1) Exceeds the temperature and time combination specified in 3-501.17 (A) except time that the product is frozen; (2) Is in a container or package that does not bear a date or day; or (3) Is inappropriately marked with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $886K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI