Lindengrove Menomonee Falls
W180 N8071 Town Hall Rd, Menomonee Falls, WI 53051 · Non profit - Corporation · 73 certified beds · (262) 253-2700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $193,798 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.1% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.6% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 46.6% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.8% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.4% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 5.0% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.5% | 24.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.4% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.2% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.1% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 15.5% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 302 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.5%CMS range 50.2–60.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.0–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 3.4–8.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 48.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility did not ensure that residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and do not develop pressure injuries unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 2 (R2 and R4) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R2 admitted to the facility without pressure injuries and was identified to be at risk for pressure injuries. Care plan interventions to prevent pressure injuries were not implemented. R2 developed a facility acquired unstageable pressure injury and the care plan was not revised. Treatments were not completed as ordered and the wound became infected requiring debridement, antibiotic treatment, and a wound vacuum. The facility's failure to provide interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure 2 (R147 & R350) of 3 residents reviewed with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure injuries from developing. * R147 developed skin concerns of MASD (moisture-associated skin damage) noted at the facility on 10/28/24. There were no care plan revisions implemented and no comprehensive assessments completed. On 11/04/24, while at the hospital, R147 was found to have an infected sacral wound requiring debridement. After debridement, the wound was classified as a stage 4 pressure injury (PI.) Upon return to the facility on [DATE], the facility failed to comprehensively assess R147's pressure injuries, did not assess the appropriateness of the type of wheelchair cushion and mattress being used, and did not implement interventions to promote healing of PIs. The facility's failure to comprehensively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, bipolar, depression, and spinal stenosis and osteoarthritis. R40 was discharged from the facility on 7/28/23. R40 had a Braden Score completed on 3/14/23 which indicated a score of 20, which is not at risk for pressure injuries. R40 had no other Braden Score completed. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/30/23 indicates R40 needed extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and hygiene. It also indicates R40 is occasionally incontinent of urine. It also indicates R40 is at risk for pressure injuries, and has no unhealed Pressure injuries. The MDS indicates R40 only has a pressure reducing device for the chair. The MDS is not checked for a turning/repositioning program. The CAA (Care Area Assessment) dated 3/20/23 indicates R40 at risk for impaired skin integrity because they are at risk for poor managed type 2 diabetes and needs assist with transitioning and repositioning, is incontinent, and has skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent an accident from occurring for 3 of 3 Residents (R1, R3, and R4) reviewed for accidents. *R3 had 10 unwitnessed falls, 3 were not thoroughly investigated for a root cause. On 7/19/25, R3 had an unwitnessed fall in which R3 sustained a left hip fracture. *R1's fall on 10/16/25 was not thoroughly investigated for a root cause. R1's fall interventions of brushing teeth after lunch, toileting schedule, call light in reach, and transferring using a gait belt were observed not to be implemented. *R4's call light was observed to not be within reach and received straws which R4 should not have due to an aspiration risk during the survey process. Findings Include: The facility's undated Falls policy and procedure documents: Policy: Prevention measures are put in place to reduce the occurrence of falls and risk of injury from falls. Procedure: 1.Fall Risk: a. Licensed nurse will complete an electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R297) of 13 residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person centered care plan and the residents choice. * R297 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an order to the left shin which continued until 8/1/24. There is only one skin assessment of this area dated 5/25/24. On 7/22/24 Advanced Practice Nurse Prescriber-FFF progress note documents two dressings on R297 left lower extremity. There are no skin assessments of R297's left lower extremity as to why dressings were applied. On 7/28/24, R297's left forearm was identified as being bruised and red with an indentation from R297's watch being too tight. On 8/1/24 R297's left forearm skin integrity changed from redness to scabbing. There is no skin assessment when R297's skin integrity changed. On 8/13/24 R297's experienced a change of condition which was not comprehensively assessed. Documentation of R297's meal intake for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. The facility did not thoroughly assess falls and accidents for causative factors. The facility did not ensure fall interventions were implemented. This was observed with 6 (R12, R23, R36, R39, R346 and R347) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. * R12's falls were not thoroughly assessed for causative factors. There was not observations of fall preventative interventions * R23's falls were not thoroughly assessed for causative factors. There was not observations of fall preventative interventions * R36 was observed not to have their call light not in reach per his falls plan of care. * R39's falls were not thoroughly assessed for causative factors. There was not observations of fall preventative interventions * R346 and R347's falls were not thoroughly assessed for causative factors. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Falls dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the timely resolution of grievances raised during monthly Resident Council meetings and failed to document a rationale when grievances were not resolved for repeated concerns with staff attentiveness and call light response times, and housekeeping services for four of seven months of resident council minutes reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet and delayed care needs, decreased satisfaction with a clean and comfortable living environment, and reduced confidence in the grievance resolution process. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance last reviewed 03/03/26 revealed, Purpose: Individual, guardian, and/or individual representative will be informed of the process to file a grievance or complaint and the facility's process to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.Procedure: The facility fosters an environment of direct communication, prompt resolution, and continuous process improvement.Quality Assurance designee will assign a manager to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment, including to ensure housekeeping services were conducted as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure floors were swept and cleaned of dirt and trash in common areas including dining rooms, on two of three units (B and D) hallways and resident rooms during three of three survey days. Specifically, this deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents quality of life in their rooms and common areas.Findings include:During an observation on 04/13/26 at 4:27 PM, the second-floor D unit dining room had papers and straws on dining room tables. The floor in this room had food debris, trash, and dirt scattered across the room and under dining room tables. During an observation on 04/14/26 at 11:00 AM through 11:24 AM, the second-floor D unit dining room floor had large black scuff marks throughout the room; straw wrappers, large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that the planned menus were followed as approved, scheduled, and posted. As a result, a pattern of 53 residents who received food prepared by the facility were not provided with the portion size as indicated on the planned menu. These failures placed facility residents at risk for weight loss, malnutrition, and dissatisfaction with their meals.Findings include:1. During an observation on 04/14/26 at 4:46 PM, the approved menus for the lunch meal revealed the following portion sizes: #8 scoop (4oz.) for mashed potatoes, apple crisp, mechanical chicken, ground chicken, carrots, and the chef choice vegetables; gravy at 2 oz.; and chicken cordon bleu, one each for regular.Review of the Portion Control Char, posted in the kitchen and in the first-floor satellite kitchen indicated that the #8 scoop (4 oz.) is identified as a gray color, #12 scoop (2 2/3 oz.) is identified as a green color, and the #16 (2 oz.) is identified by its blue color.During an observation of lunch service on 04/14/26 at 11:39 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one (Resident (R) 9) of one abuse allegation reviewed in the sample of 12 residents to the State Agency (SA) immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the incident. This failure had the possibility to negatively impact residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Program revised 02/11/26 indicated, . G. Reporting and Response: It is the policy of this facility that abuse allegations are reported per Federal and State Law. The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse.are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made.to the Executive Director of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one (Resident (R) 9) of one resident reviewed for abuse in the sample of 12 residents. This failure had the potential to negatively impact all residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Program revised 02/11/26 indicated, .E. Investigation: ABUSE POLICY REQUIREMENTS:It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated through the organization's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Incident Report and Investigation process. PROCEDURE:The investigation is the process used to try to determine what happened. The designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately.A. Investigation of Abuse: When an incident or suspected incident of abuse is reported, the Executive or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that allegations of neglect, abuse, and/or misappropriation involving 7 residents (R6, R7, R8, R9,R10, R2 and R1) were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency. *On 8/18/25, R6 initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect that R6 had not been changed for over 2 hours. On 10/2/25, R6 initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect of having to wait to be changed until the next shift. The allegation of neglect was not reported to the State Survey Agency. *On 8/12/25, R7's representative initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect that R7 had to wait a long time to get R7's call light answered. The allegation of neglect was not reported to the State Survey Agency. *On 8/4/25, R8 initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect of having to wait a long time for call light to be answered multiple times. The allegation of neglect was not reported to the State Survey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that allegations of neglect, abuse, and/or misappropriation involving 7 residents (R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R2 and R1) were not thoroughly investigated. *On 8/18/25, R6 initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect that R6 had not been changed for over 2 hours. On 10/2/25, R6 initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect of having to wait to be changed until the next shift. The allegation of neglect was not thoroughly investigated. *On 8/12/25, R7's representative initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect that R7 had to wait a long time to get R7's call light answered. The allegation of neglect was not thoroughly investigated. *On 8/4/25, R8 initiated a formal grievance to include an allegation of neglect of having to wait a long time for call light to be answered multiple times. The allegation of neglect was not thoroughly investigated. *On 9/12/25, R9's representative initiated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-11 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 of 5 direct care staff chosen at random received Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training with the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility.Certified nursing assistant (CNA)-CC, CNA-DD, CNA-EE, CNA-FF, and CNA-GG did not receive QAPI training as a new hire.Findings include:On 11/11/2025, Surveyor requested from nursing home administrator (NHA)-A the documentation of training for CNA-CC, CNA-DD, CNA-EE, CNA-FF, and CNA-GG. NHA-A stated the facility used Relias, an online computer-based training program, for staff education.Surveyor reviewed the provided training transcripts for CNA-CC, CNA-DD, CNA-EE, CNA-FF, and CNA-GG. CNA-CC, CNA-DD, CNA-EE, CNA-FF, and CNA-GG did not have documentation of receiving QAPI training.Surveyor reviewed the Facility Assessment, last review/ approval date of 3/27/2025, which documents, Staff Education, Training, and Competencies: Each job description identifies the required education and credentials for the job. Staff education and credentials are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 1 resident's representative was notified when there was a need to alter medical treatment.*R3's emergency contact/representative was not notified when R3 had a fall on 6/30/25 and 7/12/25.Findings include:The facility's undated Change of Condition and Provider Notification policy and procedure documents:I. Policy: Upon individual change of condition, proper assessment and provider notification will occur to provide timely delivery of clinical care.II. Procedure:1.Change of Conditiona. Change of Condition is a deviation from an individual's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional status. Clinically important means a deviation that, without intervention, may result in complications or death.3.Notificationb. As applicable, individual representative, managed care organization and hospice will be notified.R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 (R4) of 1 resident reviewed for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living).*R4 was to have maintained short fingernails per documented skin intervention. R4 fingernails were observed during the survey process to have extremely long fingernails on all fingers of both hands.Findings Include:The facility's undated policy titled STANDARD ADL (activities of daily living) PROTOCOL documents:- ADLS: Dressing, grooming, eating, toileting, bathing, personal hygiene (oral care, face, hands), mobility, transfers- Problem: Individual requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)- Goal: Individual will preform ADL's at highest functional level with or without staff assist.- CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant):o Trim finger and toenails on bath/shower day and as needed unless diabetico Offer handwashing/sanitizing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's choices for 3 (R1, R2, & R3) of 4 residents. *R1 receives an anticoagulant twice a day. On 10/16/25 R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall hitting her head. R1 sustained a large purplish hematoma on the left side of the R1's forehead and a skin tear on the left hand. While R1 was laying on the floor, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-N obtained vital signs and Nurse Practitioner (NP)-K assessed R1's range of motion. NP-K informed Surveyor after assessing R1's range of motion she left R1's room as multiple staff were coming into the room. NP-K informed Surveyor she planned on returning to R1's room. NP-K did not complete a comprehensive assessment and did not return until sometime after lunch. When NP-K returned sometime after 2:00 p.m., there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 (R1) of 2 residents receiving oxygen therapy.R1did not receive oxygen via nasal cannula per physician orders. On 10/16/25, the ambulance crew observed R1's oxygen tubing was disconnected at the connector and R1's oxygen level was 80%. The facility's intervention to prevent this from occurring in the future was to not use extension tubing. On 11/4/25, R1's oxygen tubing was observed to have extension tubing.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Safe Use of Oxygen and last reviewed 11/8/23 under policy documents Entity will provide individuals who are in need of oxygen safe storage, use, and transportation in regulated health care settings.The facility's, Standard Respiratory Protocol not dated under the sections Registered Nurse (RN), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) & (Med Tech) MAA all include Apply oxygen as ordered.R1's diagnoses include chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (long term condition where the lungs cannot supply enough oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (R2) of 4 residents reviewed.R2's Mirtazapine was not given as ordered.Findings include:R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right femur fracture, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage 4, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism and depression. R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 15, indicating no cognitive impairment.The facility policy titled Medication administration - general guidelines dated May 2018 documents:Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. The facility has sufficient staff and a medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (IUO) within required timeframes to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of six. Failure to report injuries of unknown origin places all residents at risk of abuse. Findings include:Review of R2's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side and quadriplegia. Review of R2's quarterly ''Minimum Data Set (MDS),'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/25, revealed R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R2's ''Nurse's Notes, dated 08/07/25 at 1:57 PM, located in the EMR under the ''Notes'' tab and written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1, revealed, . resident complained of right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of six. Failure to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin places residents at risk of continued abuse. Findings include:Review of R2's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R211 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, and quadriplegia. Review of R2's quarterly ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/25, revealed R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight out of 15, which indicated R2 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of a ''Nurse's Note,'' dated 08/07/25 at 1:57 PM, located in the EMR under the ''Notes'' tab, and written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1, revealed, . resident complained of right ankle pain and requested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide the opportunity for 1 (R3) of 3 Residents reviewed to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care by not facilitating the inclusion of R3 and/or their representative in the care planning process. *R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short term rehabilitation, and there is no documentation in R3's electronic medical record (EMR) that R3 and/or their representative participated in the development and implementation of R3's person-centered plan of care on a quarterly basis.Findings Include:The facility's Individual Care Plan Conferences policy and procedure last reviewed 3/8/23 documents: . I. Policy: A written Care Plan is developed and maintained directing a course of comprehensive care specific to the individual's needs from all appropriate disciplines and the individual's primary care provider.II. Procedure:A. Evaluations and Updates.1.The care of each individual shall be reviewed by each of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed received a prompt resolution of grievances filed, including documentation of steps taken to investigate the grievance, and corrective actions taken by the facility as a result of the grievance.R1's POA filed three grievances with the facility, and there is no evidence of the grievances being thoroughly investigated or a resolution obtained and shared with the complainant. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Grievance dated 5-8-91 with review date of 2-21-2024 documents:. Policy: individual, guardian, and/or individual representative will be informed of the process to file a grievance or complaint and the facility's process to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.Procedure: The facility fosters and environment of direct communication, prompt resolution, and continuous process improvement.B. Formal Grievance:1. All staff has access to the formal Grievance Form. Formal Grievance is to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 3 residents' care plans reviewed were revised as needed based on preferences and needs of the resident.R1's care plan was not revised to include interventions for the safe storage of R1's dentures.Findings include:On 7/14/25, at 9:51 am, Surveyor spoke with R1's Power of Attorney (POA)-O via phone call. POA-O stated the facility lost R1's dentures.The facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan with implementation date of 7/9/19 and reviewed date of 5/8/25, documents:.Policy: the Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan will reflect the individual's needs and preferences to facilitate care.Procedure:A. Within 48 hours after admission: a Baseline Care Plan will be completed and reviewed with Individual and/or Individual Representative.B. Within 21 consecutive days after admission, and in correlation with the Minimal Data Set (MDS), a comprehensive assessment will be completed and a written care plan will be developed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain the ability to carry out activities of daily living, including mobility and elimination.R1 was not provided assistance walking in hallways or to the bathroom, was not transferred at the highest practicable level, and was not provided toileting care as indicated in R1's care card and care plan.Findings Include:The facility policy titled Safe Individual Handling Program, with implementation date of 2/8/17 and reviewed date of 5/8/25 documents: . Procedure:A. Transfer Assessment1. Individuals will be assessed according to ability per transfer and movement objective criteria. Nursing will perform this assessment in collaboration with therapy as applicable.2. Once the assessment is completed, the appropriate transfer status will be determined.B. Care Plan1. Individual-specific transfer status will be addressed on the Care Plan to include specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure therapy services were provided in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 1 resident reviewed for therapy services.R1 received orders to start physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) dated 4/29/25. PT and OT services were not initiated until 7/14/25.Findings Include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, anxiety, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.R1's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 4/29/25 documents R1 requires partial assistance for showers, dressing, bed mobility, transfers, and to walk ten feet. R1 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R1 has an activated healthcare power of attorney (POA). Surveyor requested a policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not designate a licensed nurse to serve as a charge nurse on each tour of duty. * The facility did not designate a charge nurse for each tour of duty on each daily nursing schedule. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 2/11/25, Surveyor requested nursing schedules and nurse staff postings for Quarter 4 (July 1st-September 30th, 2024) due to Payroll Based Journal reporting and 1/20/25-2/10/25. Surveyor was provided with the nursing schedules and nurse staff postings and noted the facility's nursing schedules did not designate who the charge nurse was for each tour of duty. On 2/17/25, at 10:15 AM, Surveyor conducted an interview with Scheduler-HHH. Scheduler-HHH is responsible for coordinating the facility's nursing schedule and preparing the facility's nurse staff postings. Surveyor asked Schedule-HHH if they were aware there was not a charge nurse designated on the facility's nursing schedules for Quarter 4 (July 1st -September 30th,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of daily staff postings, staffing schedules, and interview, the facility did not use the services of a RN (Registered Nurse) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. * On multiple dates, there was no RN who worked at the facility for 8 consecutive hours. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 49 of 49 residents residing in the building. Findings include: 1.) On 2/11/25, Surveyor requested nursing schedules and nurse staff postings for Quarter 4 (July 1st-September 30th, 2024) due to Payroll Based Journal reporting and 1/20/25-2/10/25. Surveyor was provided with the nursing schedules and nurse staff postings and noted the facility's nursing schedules did not indicate the presence of an RN in the facility on the following dates: July 2024: July 4, 5, 9, 11, 18, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. August 2024: August 1, 2, 5, 6, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 25, 29, 30. September 2024: September 3, 8, 12, 13, 16, 21, 22, 26, 30. January 2025: January 13, 18, 19, 20, 23, 30. February 2025: February 3. On 2/17/25, at 10:15 AM, Surveyor conducted an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared, and served, in a sanitary manner. This was observed in 2 of 2 food preparation and serving areas and with the meal tray service to resident rooms on 1 (Unit A) of 4 units. * The facility did not ensure the facility kitchen dish machine was functioning to sanitize dishware. * The dietary staff was observed without hair restraints in the 1st floor kitchen preparation and serving area and the main kitchen. * On Unit A resident meal trays items were not covered during delivery to resident rooms. * The facility kitchen dish machine was not monitored, and checked, to ensure appropriate sanitization of dishware. Findings include: On 2/11/25, at 12:16 PM, the Food Service Director (FSD)-W provided policy and procedures to Surveyor. There is no date of review, or revision, on the policy and procedures. The FSD-W does not know the dates and this what they use. The facility's policy and procedure with no date and titled, Hair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on [NAME], [NAME] & [NAME] [NAME]-Water management program not implemented/not mentioned in facility, Staff not wearing proper PPE for enhanced barrier, No baseline rates of infection for prevalent infections and analysis of 2 outbreaks, The facility assessment does not include information on how facility Infection Preventionist [NAME]'s duties are being fulfilled as she conducts dual roles, [NAME]- [NAME] catheter bag laying on floor, enhanced barrier precautions PPE not followed [NAME] staff lack of hand hygiene during incontinence care [NAME]- Observations of [NAME]'s catheter bag on floor, emptying catheter without proper technique/hygiene Resident #12 FTag Initiation 02/11/25 09:28 AM 11/27/24 significant change mds bims 1 mood 00 no behavior upper & lower extremity one side eating supervision, toileting hygiene, roll left and right, chair/bed to chair transfer & toilet transfer all dependent always incontinent of urine and bowel no falls since prior assessment yes for antidepressant hospice yes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment as evidenced by having a linen shortage in order to properly take care of residents with the potential to affect a pattern of Residents who prefer to wear hospital gowns at night. * R196 informed Surveyor that hospital gowns were not available all weekend, Monday, and Tuesday (2/8-2/11/25) for bedtime and that is R196's preference to wear a hospital gown for bed. Findings include: R196 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hypothyroidism, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Essential Hypertension, and Displaced Comminuted Fracture of Shaft of Right Femur. R196's admission Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated [DATE] was in the process of being completed. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) has been completed and the score is 15, indicating R196 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. The MDS documents R196 has no mood behavior issues.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Facility not having ability to provide gowns to residents Has ability to effect a pattern of resident who prefer to wear gowns FACILITY FTAGDIR Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment as evidenced by having a linen shortage in order to properly take care of Residents with the potential to affect 1 of 4 residents interviewed () as well as those residents who receive linens from the linen carts on A,B,C,D units. *R196 informed Surveyor that hospital gowns were not available all weekend, Monday, and Tuesday for bedtime and that is R196's preference to wear a hospital gown for bed. Findings include: R196 02/10/25 10:09 AM Had to sleep in shirt last night because was told there was no gowns all wkend, did not get out bed Sat or Sun because was told the hoyer was broke so I was bedridden all weekend 02/10/25 01:42 PM States only got up with therapy briefly and then back to bed 02/11/25 08:57 AM Did not have a gown to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R197) of 1 residents reviewed were assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine it was clinically appropriate to self administer medication. * R197's as needed (PRN) Albuterol inhaler was observed in R197's drawer without a self-administration assessment and physician order to self-administer. Findings include: The facility's policy Preparation and General Guidelines for Self-Administration of Medications last revised 1/2018 documents: Policy: In order to maintain the Residents' high level of independence, Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the Resident and other Residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. Procedures A. If a Resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of Resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care for 2 (R197 and R350) of 5 residents reviewed. * R197 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not have a baseline care plan initiated upon admission. * R350 was admitted on [DATE] and did not have a baseline care plan initiated upon admission. Findings include: The facility's policy Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan dated 7/19/2019 and last revised on 8/10/23 documents: 1. Policy: The Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan will reflect the individual's needs and preferences to facilitate care. 2. Procedure: A. Within 48 hours after admission: a Baseline Care Plan will be completed and reviewed with Individual and/or Individual Representative. D. Individual and/or Individual Representative and direct care staff will participate in development of the comprehensive person centered care plan. 1.) R197 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person centered care plan was developed for 1 (R297) of 13 residents. * R297's foley catheter was discontinued on 6/7/24. The facility did not develop a urinary care plan after R297's foley catheter was discontinued. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan and last reviewed 8/10/23 under Procedure documents C. Care Plan shall be reviewed and revised quarterly, upon change of condition, and/or as needed. 1.) R297 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that includes depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary retention, diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's Disease. R297's POA (power of attorney) was activated on 4/1/22. R297's admission MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 5/31/24 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 7, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Yes is checked for indwelling catheter placement for R297. R297's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R23's diagnoses includes obstructive & reflux uropathy and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. R23 is receiving hospice services. R23's admission MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/8/24 is checked for an indwelling catheter. R23's urinary incontinence and indwelling catheter CAA (care area assessment) dated 11/11/24 documents under the analysis of findings for nature of problem/condition: neurogenic bladder obstructive urop (uropathy) foley cath (catheter) retention. Under the care plan considerations section it documents: Proceed to plan of care. Maintain Foley cath-cath places at risk for infection. Goal for no complications/infections r/t (related to) cath. R23's indwelling catheter care plan initiated 11/1/24 & revised 11/11/24 includes an intervention of monitor and document intake and output as per facility policy. This intervention is documented as initiated & revised on 11/1/24. R23's physician order dated 11/1/24 documents monitor catheter output three times a day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 (R23) of 2 residents receiving oxygen therapy. * R23's oxygen tubing was dated 12/7/24 and was not changed weekly according to R23's physician orders. Findings include: The facility's policy with no date and titled, Standard Respiratory Protocol documents under the RN (Registered Nurse) section: Replace DME (durable medical equipment) as ordered. R23's diagnoses includes interstitial pulmonary disease, heart failure, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. R23's physician orders dated 11/1/24 documents Change oxygen tubing -Date Tubing every night shift every 7 days(s). R23's admission MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/8/24 documents that R23 requires oxygen. On 2/10/25, at 11:37 a.m., Surveyor observed R23 sitting in a wheelchair receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute. Surveyor observed the oxygen tubing to be dated 12/7/24. On 2/10/25, at 3:43 p.m., Surveyor observed R23 sitting in a wheelchair in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R39) of 1 Residents reviewed for dialysis. * R39 receives dialysis three times per week. R39's dialysis center communication records are not being consistently completed by Facility nurses. Findings include: 1. R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Protein Calorie Malnutrition, End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Surveyor reviewed R39's medical record, including physician's orders and comprehensive care plans. R39's care plan with an initiation date of 7/12/24 documents: Alteration in nutrition poor oral intake, abnormal labs, gradual weight loss, decline in chewing ability R/T (related to) ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease, edentulous (without teeth), Anemia (low iron level in blood, weakness A/E/B (As Evidenced By): new dx: PCM (Plasma Cell Myeloma), beginning IDPN (Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition), Dialysis 3 x (times) a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate monitoring for adverse reactions of high-risk medications for 1 (R7) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in accordance with standards of practice. *R7 has physician's order for Warfarin (an anticoagulant) for chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity. The facility did not implement care plans to monitor for any adverse side effects that could result from taking an anticoagulant. 1.) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebral Infarction and Hyperlipidemia. R7's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/23/2024 indicates that R7 received an Anticoagulant medication during the assessment period. Surveyor reviewed R7's electronic medical record and could not locate a person-centered care plan to monitor for adverse side effects related to the use of an anticoagulant and diuretic.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 (R350, R3 and R36) or 6 residents reviewed for medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * R350 was prescribed Risperidone (anti-psychotic medication) for bipolar disorder. R350 does not have a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. R350 was prescribed Escitalopram (anti-depressant medication) without a documented diagnosis in the physician order. Facility staff did not document behavior monitoring and side effect monitoring for Risperidone and Escitalopram from 2/6/25 through 2/13/25. * R3 is prescribed an anti-depressant medication. Facility staff did not document side effect monitoring from 1/27/25 through 2/15/25. * R36 is prescribed an anti-depressant medication. Facility staff did not document side effect monitoring from 11/4/24 through 2/15/25. Findings include: The undated facility policy titled, Standard Psychoactive Medication Protocol, documents, in part: Problem-Individual is prescribed a psychotropic medication.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide 3 (R196, R197, and R347) of 3 residents reviewed for dietary services, with food accommodations and preferences as listed on the Resident's meal tickets. * R196 meal ticket states no oatmeal and received oatmeal on 2/11/25 and 2/12/25. R196 did not received the berries for breakfast on 2/13/25. * R197's meal ticket states dislikes eggs but received denver eggs on 2/11/25 for breakfast. *On 2/11/25, residents received a peanut butter cookie instead of the frosted pumpkin bar listed on the posted menu. On 2/12/25, the Residents received beef barley soup instead of french onion soup listed on the posted menu. * R347 did not received a banana per meal ticket on 2/13/25. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's dining policies and procedures. The undated Meal Identification policy documents: Policy: .A electronic meal identification and food preferences slip is used to properly identify each individual's needs and desires for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they followed their antibiotic stewardship program for 1 (R23) of 1 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. * R23 was treated with an antibiotic for a UTI (urinary tract infection) without meeting criteria. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program dated as last reviewed on 12/5/24 under the Identification section documents: Staff will follow McGeers criteria for infection identification. The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes Appendix A: Policy and Practice Actions to Improve Antibiotic Use under the section Infection specific interventions to improve antibiotic use documents Reduce antibiotic use in asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). The prevalence of ASB, bacteriuria without localizing signs or symptoms of infections, ranges from 25% to 50% in non-catheterized nursing home residents and up to 100% among those with long-term urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care in accordance with physician orders for one of four sample residents (Resident (R) 2). Specifically, the facility failed to perform a post void residual on R2 every shift as ordered. Findings include: Review of the admission Record, found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, documented R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty) without lower urinary tract. Review of the Admit/Readmit Screener form, found in the EMR under the Assessment tab, dated 05/10/24, documented R4 was alert and oriented, required limited assist with toilet use, was continent of bowel and bladder functions, and had no increased frequency, or difficulty initiating flow. Review of the Physician Orders, dated 05/11/24, documented tamsulosin and finasteride for BPH. Review of the Nurse's Note, dated 05/13/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the facility's pain policy to ensure effective pain management for one of four residents (Resident (R) 4), reviewed for pain out of a total sample of four residents. This failure resulted in harm when R4 had increased pain and cried and screamed for 3.5 hours awaiting administration of her narcotic pain medication Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Pain, dated 08/10/23 provided by the Director of Nurses (DON) documented, The Pain Tool shall be completed upon admission and quarterly. The Pain Tool shall be completed upon change in condition or if indicated. Staff will manage an individual-centered interdisciplinary care plan and implement interventions/approaches to pain management including non-pharmacological interventions .The medical provider will be consulted if pain interventions are not effective . Review of the policy titled, Medication Orders Controlled Substance Prescriptions, dated May 2018 provided by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility did not maintain documentation of a comprehensive infection control program including infection surveillance and the facility did not have a comprehensive water management plan. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 38 of the 38 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. * The facility was not able to show evidence of an infection control surveillance system designed to identify infections before they can spread to others in the facility, prior to December 1, 2023, when the facility identified the deficit and implemented a Performance Improvement Plan. While on survey, the facility was able to provide a line list about the Covid outbreak that occurred around August 7 & 8, 2023. * The facility had a water management policy entitled Water Management Program which listed components of what needed to be included in the water management program. The facility's water management program consisted of a water flow diagram with 4 sheets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not develop a comprehensive plan of care for assessed medical needs. This was discovered with 5 (R25, R3, R43, R32, and R39) of 21 medical record reviews. - R25 was admitted with medication of an antidepressant and anticoagulant. There was not a comprehensive plan of care developed for these medical concerns. -R3 was admitted with anticoagulant medication. There was not a comprehensive plan of care developed for this medical concern. -R43 eloped from the facility. There was no comprehensive plan of care developed for R43's elopement. -R39 is diabetic and receives hospice services. There was no comprehensive plan of care developed for diabetes and hospice care. -R32 receives oxygen for respiratory concerns. There was no comprehensive plan of care developed for oxygen use. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Comprehensive Person Centered Care Plan, revised 8/10/23, was reviewed by Surveyor. The policy indicates the Comprehensive Person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the Facility did not ensure eye drops and insulin were dated when opened, medications were not expired, medications belonging to residents who no longer resided in the facility were disposed of properly, and the medication refrigerator was being monitored for appropriate temperature. This deficient practice has the potential to affect R1, R29, R4 and a pattern of residents residing on the first floor who utilize refrigerated medications and/or stock medications. *R1, R29 and R4 had medications in the Unit D medication cart that were either not dated and/or expired. *The first-floor medication room contained expired stock medications. *The first-floor medication room refrigerator contained medications belonging to residents no longer in the facility and insulin that was opened but not dated. *The first-floor medication room refrigerator temperature log was not filled out. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility policy entitled Medication Storage in the Facility, dated May 2018, stated: Medications and biologics are stored safely, securely,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R43) of 7 residents reviewed for discharge received a thorough discharge summary in order to communicate necessary information to the resident *R43 discharged from the facility on 5/19/23. The facility did not complete a discharge summary or a recapitulation of their stay that was available to R43 or R43's representative upon consent. Findings include: R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with cognitive communication deficit. On 5/19/23 R43 had a planned discharge from the facility into the community. A discharge- return not anticipated assessment dated [DATE] was completed by the facility. R43's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R43 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, indicating R43's cognitive skills for decision making were moderately impaired. Surveyor reviewed R43's comprehensive care plan and could not identify any care plan addressing R43's discharge planning. Surveyor reviewed R43's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility did not conduct a root cause analysis of resident falls in order to determine whether current interventions were implemented at the time of the fall, whether current interventions were effective and to determine appropriate ongoing interventions and supervision needed for 2 (R43 and R39) of 6 residents reviewed for falls. *R43 sustained a fall on 5/7/23. The facility did not thoroughly investigate R43's fall. *R39 sustained a fall on 2/28/23. The facility did not thoroughly investigate R39's fall. Findings include: 1. R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with cognitive communication deficit. R43 discharged from the facility on 5/19/23. Surveyor reviewed R43's closed medical record including progress notes. Per medical record, R43 sustained a fall outside of the facility on 5/7/23 without injury. Surveyor noted a progress note dated 5/7/23 which reads Resident exited building and was found by hospital staff on the ground appeared to have abrasion on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not offer the pneumonia vaccine for two (R11 and R12) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Individual Immunizations, last reviewed 09/20/2023, stated, Prophylactic immunizations will be offered to individuals to promote the absence of Health Care Acquired Infections. Procedure: 1. Immunization a. Upon admission, the organization will verify the individual's immunization status, update the Primary Care Provider (PCP) as indicated, and administer immunizations as ordered. b. Individuals will be offered immunizations based upon the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations and guidelines and as prescribed by their PCP . 3. Documentation .b. Immunization consent and or refusal shall be documented within the Electronic Medical Record . 1. Surveyor reviewed R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for immunization status and noted R12 did not have documentation of any pneumonia vaccines. Surveyor reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident with a pressure injury received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for 1 of 7 (R17) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R17 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with a stage III pressure injury on their coccyx and the facility did not initiate the appropriate pressure reducing mattress until 9/13/22. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure, entitled Wound Care Prevention, Management and Documentation, dated 8/2018, documents (in part) . Policy .It is the facility's policy to identify residents at risk for impaired skin integrity. Residents who have wounds will receive the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent further skin breakdown . Procedure .3. All residents at risk for developing skin breakdown have an appropriate care plan in place identifying preventive measures . .Pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure it's medication error was was not 5 percent or greater, when 2 errors out of 28 opportunities for error was observed affecting R29 & R11, with a medication error rate of 7.14 percent. * R29 was not administered eye drops as ordered. * R11 was administered insulin beyond the expiration date. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration dated revised October, 2021 documents (in part) . .Policy: (Facility) maintains a medication administration process to safely prepare, administer, and store resident medication. Procedure: 1. Medication Administration is based on the 6 rights: Right resident, right dose, right time, right route, right drug and right documentation. 2. Medications will be administered to residents as prescribed and by persons lawfully authorized to do so in a manner consistent with appropriate infection prevention and standards of practice. F. If the medication has a date opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-03-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the daily nurse staff posting included all required information accurately. This deficient practice has the potential to affect a pattern of all 39 residents residing in the facility. The facility's nurse staff posting did not accurately reflect the correct number of staff members on each daily nurse staff posting. Findings include: On 1/25/25, Surveyor requested nursing schedules and nurse staff postings for Quarter 4 (July 1st-September 30th, 2024) due to Payroll Based Journal reporting and schedules for 1/20/25-2/10/25. Surveyor reviewed facility's nursing schedules and nurse staff postings. Surveyor noted the facility did not accurately include the proper number of staff members on each nurse staff posting for Quarter 4 and 1/20/25-2/10/25 including CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants), Medication Technicians, LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses) and RNs (Registered Nurses). On 2/17/25, at 10:15 AM, Surveyor conducted an interview with Scheduler-HHH. Scheduler-HHH is responsible for coordinating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-01-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility did not ensure the garbage and refuse were properly disposed in the outside garbage storage receptacles. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 1/2/2024 at 8:22 AM Surveyor took an initial tour of the kitchen and outside garbage receptacles with Head Chef-I. Surveyor observed 2 large dumpsters, 1 dumpster was for recyclables and the second dumpster was for garbage. The Garbage receptacle lid was open because it was full of garbage bags. There were garbage bags all along the back of the garbage receptacle on the ground. Surveyor was not able to determine what was inside the garbage bags. Surveyor asked Head Chef-I how often the dumpsters get emptied. Head Chef-I replied the dumpsters get emptied two times a week and both dumpsters should be emptied today (1/2/2024). Surveyor asked Head Chef-I who maintains the outside around the dumpsters to see if it is clean. Head Chef-I replied that maintenance manages the outside grounds. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$193,798 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $51,405 — penalty dated 2025-11-11
- $78,813 — penalty dated 2025-03-03
- $63,580 — penalty dated 2024-01-17
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-10 for 2 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-14 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARQUARDT VILLAGE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/07/2023 |
| MARKS, JULIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/05/2025 |
| MAUTHE, MATTHEW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2023 |
| DETTMAN, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| FISCHER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| HEROUX, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| KOHLHOFF, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| KONKOL, DENNIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| MEIDENBAUER, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| VAN DER LINDEN, KATIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| WAGNER, LYNNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| ILLUMINUS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2023 |
| KOZLOWSKI, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/27/2025 |
| QURYSHI, MIR ISMAIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525421. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.