Luther Manor
4545 N 92nd St, Milwaukee, WI 53225 · Non profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (414) 464-3880 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $163,627 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-10)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.5% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.2% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.4% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.5% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.7% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.5% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.3% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.5% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 82.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.1% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.0% | 15.5% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 40.3–56.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.4–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.0%CMS range 2.7–9.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.7 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.01 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R62) of 5 residents reviewed received care, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure injures and or to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent additional pressure injuries from developing. * R62 developed a pressure injury on the right buttock on 6/30/24 that was not comprehensively assessed and did not have physician notification for a treatment until 7/10/24. R62's pressure injury declined during this time, and on 7/10/24, the wound physician assessed the pressure injury as unstageable. The wound physician ordered a debriding treatment. On 7/17/24, the pressure injury was mechanically debrided to a stage 4 pressure injury. R62 was not assessed for weight loss prior to this pressure injury development. Cross reference F692. The failure of the facility to provide services to prevent pressure injury development and to ensure prompt treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R62) reviewed, based on a comprehensive assessment, maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range. * R62 was admitted with severe protein malnutrition. R62's nutritional assessments did not include actual weights that were obtained by facility staff and/or individualized interventions to provide adequate nutrition. R62 developed two periods of severe weight loss (130 lbs to 69.2 lbs, a 46.7% weight loss) that factored into the development of a stage 4 pressure injury and R62 being placed on hospice services. The facility's failure to conduct comprehensive assessments, to develop an individualized plan of care, and to provide adequate nutrition created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 3/20/24. Surveyor notified the (Nursing Home Administrator) NHA-A on 9/04/24 at 9:11 AM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 9/9/24, however, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's diagnoses included Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus. R2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documents R2 is at risk for pressure injuries. On 3/5/24 a Braden assessment was conducted for Resident with a score of 16 indicating R2 is at risk for pressure injuries. On 3/9/24, R2 was discharged to the hospital. R2 returned from the hospital to the facility on 3/20/24. On 6/3/24 at 11:15 AM, Surveyor observed R2 in their room lying in bed. R2 had a pressure relieving air mattress in place at this time. R2's left heel was floated on a pillow to provide pressure relief. Surveyor attempted to conduct interview with R2 at this time. R2 declined interview with surveyor at this time responding, I am in no mood to talk with anyone any time soon. Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record including hospital records, physician orders, progress notes, TAR (Treatment Administration Record) and comprehensive care plans Unstageable Right heel pressure injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 2 (R1 and R2) of 3 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. *R2 is at risk for developing pressure injuries. Facility staff did not document multiple weekly skin checks in the weeks prior to 8/31/25 when R2 developed a facility-acquired stage 3 pressure injury of R2's Sacrum. On 10/22/25, R2 developed two additional facility-acquired stage 2 pressure injuries to R2's right and left hip. On 11/23/25, R2's two hip pressure injuries were resolved but a week later, R2's left hip pressure injury re-opened. A treatment order for R2's left hip was not placed until 11/27/25 resulting in R2 going 6 days without treatment to R2's left hip pressure injury. After the initial development of these pressure injuries, facility staff did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure care plans were implemented for residents determined to be at risk for falls and did not ensure residents were comprehensively assessed after a fall to implement preventive measures based on the assessment for 2 (R1 and R3) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. *R1 was admitted to the facility after sustaining a fractured left hip from a fall in the community. R1 was assessed to be a high risk for falls and no care plan was developed to address the fall risk. On 4/22/2024, R1 fell from bed and sustained a fracture to the right hip. *R3 fell on [DATE] and sustained a fractured to the right hip. The fall was not thoroughly investigated as to the root cause and no care plan interventions were implemented to prevent future falls. Observations were made during the survey of fall interventions not in place per care plan. Findings include: 1.) R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of fractured neck of the left femur, post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure that all treatments and care was provided to 1 (Resident 8) of 1 sampled residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. * R8 presented with an open area to the right, superior buttocks. The open area was not assessed by a Registered Nurse (RN), nor was the treatment consistently completed as ordered. R8 was to be repositioned every 2 hours to relieve pressure on the open area and repositioning was not consistently completed. R8 was also incontinent of bladder. R8 had a toileting problem which was not consistently followed. As a result of R8 not receiving physician ordered wound treatments and not relieving pressure and moisture from the open wound, the wound declined from a scratch like appearance with granulation tissue in the wound bed to an open area that contained 40% slough (necrotic tissue). Findings include: According to the electronic admission Record, R8 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries or those admitted with pressure injuries received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers from developing for 3 (R11, R1, and R7) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R11 was admitted with excoriation to the coccyx extending to the bilateral buttock which developed into an unstagable pressure injury to the sacrum that was never comprehensively assessed. R11 was admitted on [DATE] with excoriation to the coccyx extending to the bilateral buttocks, with treatment obtained. On [DATE] the Skin Only Evaluation documented open wounds to the coccy with no comprehensive assessment conducted. On [DATE] R11's care plan was initiated to include in part the provision of pressure relieving devices, mattress, chair cusion, along with weekly measurements. On [DATE] R11's care plan was revised to include in part turn and repositon every 2 hours while in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication rooms and 1 of 3 medication carts observed, affecting more than 3 residents but less than widespread. Findings include:The facility policy titled Labeling of Medications and Biologicals implemented 9/21 documents (in part) . 4. Labels for individual drug containers must include:h. The expiration date when applicable.8. Labels for multi-dose vials must include:a. The date the vial was initially opened or accessed (needled punctured).b. All opened or accessed vials should be discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. The facility policy titled Multi-Dose Vials implemented 8/21 documents (in part) . It is the policy of this facility to ensure proper and safe use of multi-dose vials of medications.2. Multi-dose vials will be re-labeled with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not address and resolve grievances conveyed on behalf of 1 (R9) of 6 grievances reviewed.*R9 expressed care concerns. There was no documentation this was thoroughly investigated, along with an appropriate resolution.Findings include:The facility policy last revised February 2025 and titled Grievance documents:Objective of Grievance PolicyThe objective of the grievance policy is to ensure the facility makes prompt efforts to resolve grievances a resident may have in a timely manner. The intent of the grievance process is to support each resident's right to voice grievances (e.g., those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) and to assure that after receiving complaint/grievance, the facility actively seeks a resolution and keeps the resident appreciated its progress toward resolution. E. A grievance or concern can be expressed orally to the Grievance Official or facility staff or in writing using a grievance form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident who uses a psychotropic PRN (as needed) drug had an order limited to 14 days for 1 (R9) of 6 residents reviewed for medications.R9 had an order for PRN Lorazepam with a start date of 11/14/2025 and no end date.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure implemented 9/3/25 and titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication documents:Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:16. Psychotropic medications used on a PRN basis must have a diagnosed specific condition and indication for the PRN use documented in the resident's medical record and is subject to the limitations as noted:a. PRN orders for psychotropic medications, excluding antipsychotics, shall be limited to no more than 14 days, unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes it is appropriate to extend the order beyond the 14 days. The medical record should include documentation from the physician or prescriber for the rationale for the extended time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 2 (R6 and R5) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. *R6 has a history of falls and is at high risk for falls. R6 experienced falls while at the facility. R6's fall care plan was not updated timely after a fall. R6 has an active intervention for a seat belt while in the wheelchair. On 10/24/25, R6 slid out of R6's wheelchair at the dining room table. After the fall, facility staff entered a new intervention on R6's care plan that documented, Locate [wheelchair] with seat belt, ensure positioning of [wheelchair] on [dining room] table appropriate and close to the table. R6's seat belt was not on the wheelchair at the time of the fall. During interviews, Surveyor was informed that R6's wheelchair with the seatbelt was out for repair and R6 did not have a seatbelt on at the time of the 10/24/25 fall. Surveyor observed R6's fall care plan interventions not in place during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services, and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments was received for 1 (R51) of 1 residents reviewed.Findings include:The facility's Hemodialysis policy implemented 9/21 and revised 8/24 documents:Policy: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences to meet the special medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis.Purpose: The facility will ensure that each resident receives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff members timely reported an allegation of suspected abuse to the Administrator for 4 (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) of 4 sampled residents related to 2 incidents (01/12/2025 and 07/01/2025) of 3 sampled for abuse. The facility also failed to ensure the facility timely reported an allegation of suspected abuse to the state agency for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 4 sampled residents related to 2 incidents (05/20/2025 and 07/01/2025) of 3 sampled for abuse.Findings included:The facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, and Exploitation, implemented June 2025, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy revealed the section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility did not address and resolve grievances conveyed on behalf of 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for grievances. * On 12/11/2024, a grievance was initiated for R1 regarding R1 requesting to be transferred to bed from R1's wheelchair. R1's grievance stated that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), refused to transfer R1due to the request being too close to the shift change. The refusal resulted in R1 having to wait one hour to be transferred into bed. The grievance packet involving the above grievance was missing information and did not have a clear resolution. Findings include: The facility's policy, titled Grievance Policy, with the last reviewed date of 2/2020 documents: G. Response Any employee of this facility who receives a complaint shall immediately attempt to resolve the complaint within the role and authority. If a complaint cannot be immediately resolved employee shall escalate the complaint to their supervisor and the facility grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital discharge summary, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure orders were transcribed correctly for one of three residents (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for medication orders out of 13 sample residents to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This had the potential for the residents to have unmet health care needs. Findings include: Review of R4's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cytomegaloviral disease (CMV/common virus). The resident discharged from the facility on 12/23/24. Review of R4's hospital After Visit Summary, dated 11/26/24 to 12/11/24 and located in the EMR under the Misc tab, revealed the resident was to continue to receive ganciclovir (antiviral medication to treat viruses) 2.5 milligrams (mg/kg [kilogram]) = 250 mg in dextrose 100 ml (milliliter) bag by intravenous (IV) route two times a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a written consent explaining the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications was obtained for 1 of 1 Residents reviewed (R58). * R58 was prescribed Seroquel, 12.5 mg (milligrams) 2 times daily, an antipsychotic medication for agitation related to Delusional Disorder diagnosis on 9/27/24. On 10/8/24, Seroquel was increased to 12.5 mg 3 times daily. The facility did not have a written, signed consent explaining the risks and benefits of Seroquel by R58's activated power of attorney (POA). Findings Include: 1.) R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Depression, Fracture of Left Femur, Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Polyneuropathy, and Anemia. R58 currently has an activated Health Care Power of Attorney(HCPOA). Surveyor noted the facility was not able to provide Surveyor with documentation of the competency evaluation for R58 that determined R58 was no longer able to make health care decisions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY UNCORRECTED ON VERIFICATION VISIT Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that 3 allegations of abuse involving 2 residents (R2 and R58) and 1 Resident to Resident (R3 and R4) altercation were reported to the State Survey Agency within the required reporting timeframe . * R2's Alleged Nursing Home Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, and Abuse Report documenting a bruise of unknown origin was submitted to the State Survey Agency on 9/3/24. The Misconduct Incident Report was not submitted to the State Survey Agency until 10/16/24. * R58's Alleged Nursing Home Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, and Abuse Report documenting an allegation of rape was submitted to the State Survey Agency on 9/26/24. The Misconduct Incident Report was not submitted to the State Survey Agency until 10/16/24. On 10/15/24, R58 called the police alleging an assault had taken place over the weekend. The facility did not submit an Alleged Nursing Home Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, and Abuse Report and a Misconduct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY UNCORRECTED ON VERIFICATION VISIT Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure all allegations involving potential abuse (R58) and Resident to Resident altercation (R3 and R4) were thoroughly investigated for 3 of 3 reviewed self reports. * R58's Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 9/12/24 documents an allegation of R58 being raped along with R58 sustaining blunt force trauma to the chest. The FRI does not contain other resident statements, all staff statements, or a root cause analysis of the circumstances of the allegation. The FRI does not contain an investigation of the blunt force trauma. Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 10/16/24 documents an allegation of R58 being raped by a male caregiver. The FRI does not contain other resident statements, all staff statements, or a root cause analysis of the circumstances of the allegation. On 10/15/24, R58 called the police alleging an assault had taken place over the weekend. The facility did not submit an Alleged Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not incorporate the recommendations from the Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 2 determination and evaluation report into a Resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 (R58) of 1 Resident reviewed with PASARR level 2 recommendations. *R58's PASARR dated 10//21/24 determination states R58 requires specialized psychiatric rehabilitation services to address R58's mental illness. Findings Include: The facility's policy Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program dated 10/22/21 documents: Policy: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review(ASA) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for individuals with a mental disorder for 1 (R58) of 1 residents reviewed for PASARR screening. * R58 was admitted on [DATE] and the Level I PASARR was completed indicating R58 would be in the skilled nursing facility for less than 30 days. R58 is currently a Resident in the facility. A Level I PASARR was not resubmitted/updated indicating R58 was going to be at the facility longer than the 30 exemption period triggering a Level II PASARR to be completed until 10/16/24. On 10/21/24, it was determined that R58 requires services called 'specialized psychiatric rehabilitation services' for R58's mental illness. Findings include: The facility's policy Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program dated 10/22/21 documents: Policy: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review(ASA) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY UNCORRECTED ON VERIFICATION VISIT Based on interview and record review, the facility did not update the person-centered care plan and ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented to meet a resident's psychosocial needs for 1 (R58) of 1 resident. * R58's comprehensive care plan has not been updated with person-centered interventions including incorporating Level II PASARR recommendations of requiring 'specialized psychiatric rehabilitation services'. Findings Include: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans revised 9/23, documents: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement an effective discharge planning process focusing on resident discharge goals, and preparation for transition for 1 (R58) of 1 residents reviewed for discharge planning. * R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Left Femur Fracture with the goal to discharge home and/or a lesser restrictive environment. R58 has not had consistent and active discharge planning since admission. Findings Include: The facility's policy Transfer and discharge date d 10/21 documents: .The comprehensive, person-centered care plan shall contain the Resident's goals for admission and desired outcomes and shall be in alignment with the discharge. 1.) R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Depression, Fracture of Left Femur, Unspecified Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Polyneuropathy, and Anemia. R58 currently has an activated Health Care Power of Attorney(HCPOA). Surveyor notes the facility was not able to provide Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 (R150) of 8 residents reviewed for ADL's (Activity of Daily Living). On 10/29/24, R150 was not provided with incontinence care every two hours and was observed with a saturated incontinence product. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Incontinence and dated 10/21 under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents 4. Residents that are incontinent of bladder or bowel will receive appropriate treatment to prevent infections and to restore continence to the extent possible. 1.) R150's was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that includes diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominate side, quadriplegia and depression. The functional bladder incontinence care plan initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R58) of 4 residents reviewed received medically related social services to address individual Resident needs in order to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. * R58 has a history of trauma as identified in a trauma assessment completed on [DATE]. The facility social worker (SW)-C did not establish an individualized plan of care to address R58's trauma. On [DATE], a Level II PASARR screen determined that R58 requires specialized psychiatric rehabilitation services to promote the highest practicable psychosocial well-being for R58. The facility did not update R58's comprehensive care plan with person-centered interventions. SW-D has not actively assisted R58 to identify and prepare for alternate placement. Findings include: 1.) Surveyor requested a medically related social service policy and procedure and the facility was not able to provide a policy to Surveyor. The facility's assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure the Covid 19 outbreak reflected accurate data, the surveillance of infections were not identified on the infection line list and the monthly infections rates did not accurately identify infections. Visual alerts such as signs at the entrance to notify everyone of the current outbreak and instructions about current recommendations was not done. * CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were observed not using hand hygiene appropriately during meal service. These deficient practices have the ability to affect all 90 residents residing at the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: 1.) A Covid 19 outbreak was identified on 8/6/24 when two facility staff members developed symptoms and tested positive for Covid 19. The outbreak line list identified two residents that tested positive for Covid on 8/12/24. The last person that tested positive with Covid was a staff member on 8/14/24. On 8/20/24, R65 tested positive for Covid and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4.) R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that includes chronic kidney disease, anemia, osteoarthritis, and constipation. R59's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/19/24, documents that R59 has short and long-term memory problems, impairments to both upper extremities, and is dependent with toileting, dressing, and transferring. R59 was documented as not having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) evaluation due to R59 is rarely/never understood. R59's care plan, dated 12/15/23, documents: ~ R59 has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to impaired mobility and osteoarthritis (date initiated 12/15/23, revised on 8/23/24). Interventions include: 1. Provide appropriate level of assistance for ADL care needs to R59 (date initiated 12/15/23). 2. R59 requires a set up for eating (date initiated 5/22/24). 3. R59 requires max assistance with upper body dressing and is dependent with lower body dressing (date initiated 5/22/24). 4. R59 requires total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 2 of 2 medication storage rooms did not have expired stock medication and expired & not dated insulin for R11. * Expired 0.9 sodium chloride irrigation 500 ml (milliliter) bottle, stock Systane lubricant eye drops and tear eye drop advanced were observed in the 2900 unit medication storage room. * Expired stock tear eye drop advance and a bottle of Lantus insulin was expired for R11. A second bottle of Lantus, which was open & used, was not dated when opened. This has the potential to affect 9 residents residing on the 2700 unit and 14 residents residing on the 2900 unit who may have eye drops ordered. Findings include: 1.) On [DATE], at 9:35 a.m., Surveyor observed the 2900 unit medication storage room with Med Tech (Medication Technician)-F. On the wire rack Surveyor observed a bottle of 0.9% sodium chloride irrigation usp 500 ml with the expiration date of 02-01-2024. In the cabinet to the left there is a stock bottle of Systane…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure residents on psychotropic medications received monitoring, and dose reductions, to minimize use of these medications. This was observed with 4 (R50, R62, R38 and R49) of 6 resident medication reviews. - R50 receives an antipsychotic medication, and did not have a AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale) assessment, to monitor for side effects. - R62 receives an antipsychotic medication, and did not have a AIMS assessment, to monitor side effects. - R38 receives Cymbalta and Sertraline once daily for depression. The facility has no evidence of AIMS (abnormal involuntary monitory scale) monitoring and no evidence of an attempted dose reduction. - R49 receives an psychotropic medication that was not reviewed for a gradual dose reduction. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Use of Psychotropic Medication dated 10/22. The procedures include: 6.) Residents who use psychotropic drugs shall receive gradual dose reductions, unless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not report 2 (R5 and R77) of 3 allegations of abuse or neglect to the State Survey Agency during the required timeframe. A report of abuse or neglect was not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A for 1 (R77) of 3 allegations during the required timeframe. * An accusation of abuse was made involving R77 which was not reported to the NHA-A during the required timeframe. * The Facility did not report a resident-to-resident altercation involving R77 to the State Survey Agency. * On 7/9/24, R5 returned to the facility from a hospitalization on 7/3/24 - 7/9/24. R5 was discovered to have a femur fracture and the facility did not conduct an investigation or report the injury of unknown origin to the State Agency. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Alleged Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Mistreatment-Reporting and Investigation revised 2/2020, documents: Purpose -Facility will prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R5 and R77) of 3 residents reviewed had thorough investigations into allegations of abuse or injuries of unknown origin. * On 7/9/24, R5 returned to the facility from a hospitalization. R5 was discovered to have a femur fracture and the facility did not conduct an investigation into R5's femur fracture. * An accusation of abuse was made involving R77 which was not investigated thoroughly * A resident-to-resident altercation took place involving R77 which was not investigated thoroughly Findings include: The facility's Alleged Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Mistreatment Reporting and Investigation policy dated August 1995, last revised on February 2020 documents: ~ The facility is in compliance with the reporting and investigation guidelines specific to each program area governed by the Division of Quality Assurance (DQS)/Office of Caregiver Quality (QOC). ~ All alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R5, R34, and R32) of 3 residents reviewed that required hospitalizations were given written reason for transfer to the hospital and the facility did not send this notification to the Ombudsman. R5 was transferred to the hospital on 8/23/24, 8/12/24, 7/3/24, 5/24/24, and 5/15/24 for changes in condition. R5 or their representative did not receive written notification of transfer to the hospital and the State Ombudsman was not sent a copy of this notice. R34 was transferred to the hospital on 4/6/24 while residing in the facility and evidence was not provided R34 or their representative were given the required transfer notice information including appeal rights. On 8/12/24, R32 had a change in condition and was sent to the hospital. R32 was admitted to the hospital and a bed hold notice was given. R32 did not receive a transfer notice for the hospitalization on 8/12/24. Findings include: The facility's policy Transfer and discharge date d 10/2021…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the resident's status at the time of the assessment for 1 (R77) of 24 residents reviewed. R77's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 6/19/24, did not accurately reflect R77's occurrence of behaviors. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion implemented 10/21, documents (in part): Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity, using the RAI specified by the State. 4. Care Plan Team Responsibility for Assessment Completion: . ii. Persons completing part of the assessment must attest to the accuracy of the section they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not update the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 (R29, R49, and R64) of 24 residents to meet a resident's medical, nursing and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. * R64's care plan was not updated when foley catheter was removed. * R49's care plan was not updated to address condom catheter use. * R29's care plan was not updated for compression sleeve use. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans revised 9/23, documents: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not follow up on pharmacist recommendations reports, with the monthly medication reviews for 2 (R62 and R77) of 5 residents reviewed. - R62 and R77's pharmacy irregularities reports documented by the pharmacist for the physician were not acted upon. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Pharmacy Services dated 10/22. The policy documents: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that pharmaceutical services, whether employed by the facility or under an agreement, are provided to meet the needs of each resident, are consistent with state and federal requirements, and reflect current standards of practice. 1.) R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia. R62 had Pharmacy Review on 6/8/24 that documents a pharmacy note was written. There was no documentation in the medical record regarding the pharmacy report. R62 had Pharmacy Review on 7/1/24 that documents a pharmacy note was written. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R64) of 1 residents reviewed were free from significant medication errors. *R64 had a physician order to receive Plavix Oral Tablet 75mg (anticoagulant) one time a day. R64 did not receive 6 administrations of Plavix between 7/28/2024 and 8/11/2024. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled, Unavailable Medications last reviewed 6/23, documents: Policy: This facility shall use uniform guidelines for unavailable medications. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility maintains a contract with a pharmacy provider to supply the facility with routine, prn, and emergency medications. 2. A STAT supply of commonly used medications is maintained in-house for timely initiation of medications. 3. The facility shall follow established procedures for ensuring residents have a sufficient supply of medications. 4. Medications may be unavailable for a number of reasons. Staff shall take immediate action when it is known that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed received the required 12 hours of continuing competence training. This deficient practice has the ability to affect 90 residents whom could receive care from the CNA. CNA-M was hired on 10/31/22 and received only 4.5 hours of continuing competence training. Findings include: 1.) On 9/10/24, Surveyor obtained a sample of 5 CNAs to review for their 12 hours of continuing competence training. Surveyor reviewed CNA-M's training record. CNA-M was hired on 10/31/22 and her training hours indicate she only received 4.5 hours of continuing competence training. On 9/10/24 at 11:45 a.m., Surveyor interviewed DON (Director of Nursing)-B regarding CNA-M's continuing competence training. Surveyor asked DON-B if this the in-service hours provided for CNA-M were accurate. DON-B stated yes there isn't any other in-service hours for CNA-M. On 9/10/24 at 11:49 a.m., Surveyor interviewed NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A. Surveyor asked NHA-A who is responsible for ensuring CNAs attain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that an allegation of abuse involving 1 (R3) of 2 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency. *On 4/17/24 an allegation of R3 being choked by a certified nursing assistant(CNA) was not reported to the state survey agency within 2 hours and local law enforcement was not notified of the allegation immediately. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Alleged Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Mistreatment-Reporting and Investigation policy and procedure last revised 2/2020 and notes the following in regards to reporting: .Purpose .Facility is in compliance with the reporting and investigation guidelines specific to each program area governed by the State Survey and Compliance Agencies(Division of Quality Assurance(DQA)/Office of Caregiver Quality(OCQ)). .All alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation must be reported and investigated in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure all allegations involving potential abuse, neglect and misappropriation of Resident property were thoroughly investigated for 2 (R3 and R4) of 2 sampled residents. *R3's Facility Reported Incident(FRI) dated 4/17/24 documents an allegation of R3 being choked. The FRI does not contain other Resident statements, all staff statements, the reasoning for why the local law enforcement was not notified and a root cause analysis of the circumstances of the allegation. *R4's Facility Reported Incident(FRI) dated 4/1/24 documents an allegation of R3 being choked. The FRI does not contain other Resident statements, all staff statements, and a root cause analysis of the circumstances of the allegation. Surveyor reviewed the facility's Alleged Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Mistreatment-Reporting and Investigation policy and procedure last revised 2/2020 and notes the following in regards to a thorough investigation: Thorough investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 1 (R3) of 1 residents reviewed received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. *R3's hospital discharge paperwork dated 12/20/23 has instructions for R3 to follow-up for an orthopaedic consult to be scheduled within 6 weeks after discharge. R3 did not have a consult until 3/11/24. The consult documented that R3 was to return in 1 month for repeat x-rays. R3 did not have that appointment. R3 was scheduled for an orthopaedic appointment on 5/7/24 which R3 did not attend. Findings Include: 1.) On 6/5/24 at 11:54 AM, Administrator(NHA-A) informed Surveyor the facility does not have a policy and procedure for Resident appointments. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Essential Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, Pulmonary Fibrosis, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail enabled an accurate reconciliation affecting 1 unit of 2 units. * Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN UM)-K diverted narcotic medications from discharged and expired residents. LPN UM-K did not follow the procedure to have two nurses sign the narcotic record form when narcotics were destroyed and shredded narcotic record forms so narcotic medications could not be reconciled. Findings: The facility policy and procedure entitled Medication Administration: Destruction of Controlled Schedule II Medications dated 9/2023 states: Purpose: 1. The destruction of controlled substance Schedule II Medications is required by Wisconsin Administrative Code HFS 132.65(6)(c)2. 2. All controlled substance Schedule II medications must be destroyed once the order is discontinued or upon the death or permanent discharge of a resident. Guidelines: 1. Schedule II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not report the results of abuse/neglect investigations to the state agency within 5 working days for 1 (Resident 2) of 5 sampled investigations. The facility reported an initial allegation of abuse/neglect to the state agency but did not report the full investigation within five working days as required by state law. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Alleged Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Mistreatment-Reporting and investigation, with a revision date of 02/20020, indicated for every report submitted, a follow report detailing the Investigation must be submitted to Division of Quality Assurance/Office of Caregiver Quality within 5 working days even if it is determined that a violation did not occur. The facility received a concern from R2's family member indicating that R2 was sent to a doctor's appointment without an escort. R2 was nonverbal and has severe cognitive deficits. Registered Nurse (RN) allowed R2 to leave the facility unattended and was aware that R2's family member was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not have evidence that alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 3 (Residents 3, 4 and 6 ) of 5 sampled allegations of abuse/neglect. The facility submitted allegations of abuse/neglect for Residents (R) 3, 4 and 6, but there was not evidence that the allegations were thoroughly investigated nor did the facility complete training to staff to ensure they should not take money for any residents in attempt to prevent exploitation. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Alleged Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Mistreatment-Reporting and investigation, with a revision date of 02/20020, directed the following: ~ Obtain written statements from all witnesses or persons with information. ~ Obtain a written, signed statement from the accused individual ~ Contact law enforcement or other regulatory agency if appropriate. 1. On 10/28/2023, the facility submitted a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), that indicated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) L had received money via a cash app to purchase…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure that 1 (Resident 8) of 1 sampled residents received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible. * R8 was incontinent of bladder. The facility did not complete a comprehensive assessment for bladder incontinence. The facility did not complete a voiding study in attempt to determine a voiding pattern and develop a toileting schedule based on the voiding study. The facility developed a toileting schedule but was not based on a voiding study. The plan of care directed staff that R8 was to be checked and change every 3 hours during the AM and PM shift. This was not consistently followed. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Continence Management with a revision date of 06/2020 indicated that a resident who is incontinent of bladder will receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible. The policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. R76 was admitted to the facility 6/8/23 with diagnoses that include Fracture of Right Femur, Fracture of Left Femur, Fracture of Shaft of Right Humerus, Fracture of Lower End of Left Humerus, Fracture of Head of Left Radius, Fracture of Lower End of Left Radius, Fracture of Upper End of Left Ulna, Fracture of Right Forearm, Fracture of Olecranon Process, Fracture of Trapezium, Fracture of Right Patella, Fracture of Left Patella, Bimalleolar Fracture of Left Lower Leg, Multiple Fractures of Ribs, Fracture of Sternum, Acute Pain Due to Trauma, and Bipolar Disorder. Surveyor reviewed R76's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/15/23. Documented under Cognition was a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. Documented under Medications was .Medications Received: Indicate the number of DAYS the resident received the following medications by pharmacological classification, not how it is used, during the last 7 days or since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse involving 2 residents (R138 and R76) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse were reported in accordance with regulatory time frames. The facility did not ensure R138's allegation of abuse was reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours, to the Administrator and to the State Agency. The facility did not ensure the results of their investigation involving R76's allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency within 5 working days of the incident. *R138 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D on the evening of 4/12/23, that R138 was physically assaulted during a shower. LPN-D did not report the alleged allegation of abuse to the Administrator. The Administrator was notified of the alleged abuse on 4/13/23 when on 4/13/23, R138 reported the allegation to Receptionist-C during discharge from facility. This alleged abuse was then reported to the State Agency. *R76 was named in a facility self-report alleging an allegation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure all allegations of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (R138) of 3 self-reports reviewed for abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. The facility did not have evidence of preventing further abuse while the investigation was in progress. * On 4/12/23, R138 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-H was physically assaulting her during a shower. On 4/12/23, LPN-D reported to Registered Nurse (RN) G that R138 was upset but did not specify the allegation of abuse. The facility did not prevent the potential for further abuse from occurring as the accused CNA-H continued performing resident cares after the allegation was first made on 4/12/23. The facility did not initiate an investigation into this allegation of abuse until the following day on 4/13/23. CNA-H was allowed to conduct resident cares once the investigation was initiated on 4/13/23. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Alleged incidents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 Residents (R20, R29, and R26) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization received a transfer notice to include date of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. In addition, the facility did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of hospital transfers for 3 Residents (R20, R29, and R26) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. R20 was transferred to the hospital on 6/22/23, 6/23/23, 6/29/23, and 7/24/23. The facility did not provide R20, their representative, and the Ombudsman notice of transfer. R29 was transferred to the hospital on 4/18/23 and 5/23/23. The facility did not provide R29, their representative, or the Ombudsman notice of transfer. R26 was transferred to the hospital on 5/7/23. The facility did not provide R26, their representative, and the Ombudsman notice of transfer. Findings include: The facility could not provide a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide written notice of the facility bed-hold policy for 3 (R20, R29, R26) of 4 residents reviewed for hospital transfers. R20 was transferred to the hospital on 6/22/23, 6/23/23, 6/29/23, and 7/24/23. A bed hold notice was not provided to R20 and their resident representative. R29 was transferred to the hospital on 4/18/23 and 5/23/23. A bed hold notice was not provided to R29 and their representative. R26 was transferred to the hospital on 5/7/23. A bed hold notice was not provided to resident and their resident representative. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Health Care Center Bed Hold and Return, revised 6/2018, states: It is the policy of [NAME] manor that residents who are transferred to the hospital or go on a therapeutic leave are provided with written information about the State's bed hold duration and payment amount before the transfer. 1. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility did not ensure that a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 (R76) residents reviewed with a history of trauma. * R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a prolonged hospital stay from multiple fractures and complications related to a gunshot wound (GSW) and a fall out of a window from a 4th story building and bipolar disorder. R76 had multiple complications and was admitted to the facility with identified trauma and related behaviors. The facility completed a Brief Trauma Questionnaire Assessment with R76. Information gathered through this assessment was not incorporated into R76's care plan in order to reduce stressors triggering trauma induced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure it maintained a medication error rate below 5 percent during observations of medication administration affecting 1 (R36) of 4 residents observed. Two medication errors were observed out of twenty-eight opportunities, for a total error rate of 7.14%. * R36 was administered 2 medications whole with applesauce that should not be chewed. R36 was observed chewing Januvia and Memantine ER (extended release) and drug manufacturers recommendations are not to chew the medication. Findings include; On 07/27/23 the facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration dated 03/21 read: Crushing oral medication. Non-crushable medications cannot be without a specific medical doctor order documented on the medical record for a specific resident and specific medication. Long acting or enteric coated dosage forms should generally not be crushed: an alternative should be sought. R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 07/26/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$163,627 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $103,705 — penalty dated 2024-09-10
- $34,468 — penalty dated 2024-06-11
- $25,454 — penalty dated 2024-02-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-11 for 53 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-29 for 14 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNITED LUTHERAN PROGRAM FOR THE AGING, INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/1966 |
| CHEDID, STEPHANIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/18/2015 |
| HANSEN, PATRICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/14/2017 |
| KEUP, ARTHUR | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/13/2017 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/24/2025 |
| SODEXO AMERICA, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/24/2025 |
| COOPER, DELILA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/15/2024 |
| GIBBS, KAREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/27/2021 |
| JUNG, KIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/09/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525588. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.