Careview Health And Rehab Of Minocqua
9969 Old Hwy 70 Rd, Minocqua, WI 54548 · For profit - Individual · 72 certified beds · (715) 356-6016 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (85) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $42,834 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.0% | 16.1% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.7% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.3% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.6% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.2% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 5.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.7% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.1% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.9% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.9% | 23.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 27.2% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.89 | 1.66 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.78 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 37.1–61.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.8–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.7–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 51.3 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
85 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R43) received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and received necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure injuries (PI) from developing.R43 was at risk for pressure injury development. The facility failed to implement aggressive interventions to prevent PI development, ensure treatment orders were completed as ordered, and failed to complete a comprehensive assessment upon discovery of a new PI on R43's left heel. R43 developed an avoidable pressure injury (PI) that deteriorated to stage IV with osteomyelitis requiring hospitalization and intravenous antibiotic therapy. This created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:10 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE]. The deficient practice continues at a scope…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 or 7 residents (R2). R2 has a history of an elevated international normalized ratio (INR) blood test for blood clotting time while taking an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication. R2 did not receive adequate monitoring while receiving the anticoagulant medication in conjunction with an antibiotic. Registered Nurse (RN) C assessed R2 and found a large amount of blood in R2's stool, on an incontinent pad, and when R2 was rolled a large amount of blood expelled from R2's rectum. R2 was transferred to the emergency room and found to have a critical INR level of 9.3. R2 was given vitamin K and Kcentra to reverse the anticoagulation and prevent further bleeding. This is evidenced by:Facility's policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Protocol with revised date of April 2007, documented 1. The physician will identify, and order diagnostic and lab testing based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for 4 of 5 residents (R) [R2, R3, R5, and R9] reviewed for medication administration. R5 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R2, R3, R9 are being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). -R5 has a history of pancreatic and kidney transplant and receives antirejection medications. R5 did not receive his antirejection medications Mycophenolate Mofetil (medications that prevents the body from rejecting a transplanted organ) for 37 days and Tacrolimus (medication that prevents body from rejecting a transplant) for several days. This caused R5 psychosocial harm evidenced by R5 stating he had ongoing feelings of anxiety, fear, and depression surrounding the potential rejection of his transplanted organs due to the lack of medication availability. -The facility missed 3 days of R3's anticonvulsant medications (Lacosamide) (a medication that aids in prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) with indwelling Foley catheters received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent complications or urinary tract infections (UTI) from the catheter for 3 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed.-R4's suprapubic catheter output was not monitored per physician's order and assessments not completed per professional standards of practice. R4 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] after 2 days of increased incontinence, and hospitalized for four days with a Urinary Tract Infection. This example is cited at actual harm.-R2's Foley catheter output was not monitored per physician orders.-R5's suprapubic catheter output was not monitored per physician orders.This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, with a revised date of 04/2010, states in part: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Input/Output: 1. Observe the resident's urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-22 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure the physician was notified of laboratory results for 1 of 2 residents (R), R7, reviewed for lab results. -A urinalysis (U/A) determined R7 had a urinary tract infection (UTI). The facility did not update R7's primary provider or urologist with the results; four days later R7 was hospitalized due to sepsis. Findings: R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with past medical history notable for cerebral palsy, urinary retention with chronic suprapubic catheter, and urinary tract infections. Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 02/14/25 confirmed R7 scored 15/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. R7 is dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R7's care plan included the following: -Renal insufficiency related to hydronephrosis (fluid in kidneys), history of calculus (stone) of ureter (a tube that carries urine from the kidney to the bladder) with obstruction, nephritis (kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6 Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act,) the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choice for 2 of 12 sampled residents (R6 and R21.) R21 did not have comprehensive Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) assessments completed or labs completed to determine worsening CHF. R21 was hospitalized with exacerbation of CHF and Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. This example is cited at actual harm. R6 has multiple non pressure wounds that were not assessed weekly and had missed wound care appointments. Findings include: Example 1: According to the Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act, N6.03(1), An R.N. shall utilize the nursing process in the execution of general nursing procedures in the maintenance of health, prevention of illness or care of the ill. The nursing process consists of the steps of assessment, planning, intervention and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident is free from verbal abuse perpetrated by a resident for 1 (R12) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. On 3/29/26, R11 was heard verbally yelling and threatening R12 to shut up and if R12 did not shut up R11 would help R12 to shut up. Findings include:The facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated August 2006, states: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The facility policy titled, Reporting Abuse to Facility Management, dated April 2010, states:2. To help with recognition of incidents of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided:b. Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability.13. A completed copy of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 abuse investigations reviewed involving (R11 and R12). On 3/29/26, the facility was made aware that R12 yelled at R11 to shut up and if R12 did not shut up R11 would help R12 to shut up.~ There was no formal investigation of the incident.~ There was no care plan intervention to protect R11 from R12 from further verbal abuse. \Findings include:The facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated August 2006, states: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The facility policy titled, Reporting Abuse to Facility Management, dated April 2010, states: It is the responsibility of our employees, facility of our employees, . To promptly report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or resident abuse.2. To help with recognition of incidents of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided:b. Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, 1 of 3 residents (R5) at risk of falls did not receive adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent potential accidents from occurring. R5 required the assistance of 2 staff for transfers with mechanical Hoyer lift. Staff continued to transfer R5 with a mechanical sit-to-stand lift, then to assist of 2 stand-pivot transfer.Findings include:R5 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including in part, kidney transplant status, pancreatic transplant status, immunodeficiency due to drugs, diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy, type 1 diabetes with polyneuropathy, dementia without behavioral disturbance, Charcot's joint of multiple sites acquired absence of right great toe, hypertension, foot drop of left foot, and osteoporosis. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates R5 has Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored 14/15, indicating R5 had intact cognition. MDS indicates R5's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with transfers, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident (R) maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed. (R1)~ Facility did not implement daily weights per admission orders for R1. R1 experienced a 11-pound weight loss, 9.55% in the first 17 days. ~ Facility did not ensure a registered dietician assessment of the nutrition status and diet orders for resident with tube feeding with admission.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Enteral Nutrition, dated November 2011, states:1. A dietician will assess residents who are receiving enteral feedings and will make appropriate recommendations for interventions to enhance tolerance and nutritional adequacy of enteral feedings.2. If a dietician is not available prior to the first feeding, the Dietician on call will be contacted. The Dietician will review admission information with the nursing staff and physician to determine the initial orders.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R3) of 1 resident reviewed for intravenous therapy received intravenous care consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. R3 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) which is a soft, thin, flexible tube in a vein used to administer IV (Intravenous) medications. The facility did not administer IV medications or complete PICC line care as physician orders state. Findings include:R3 was re-admitted to facility on 01/16/26 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side, portal hypertension, unspecified cirrhosis of liver, kidney transplant, unspecified hydronephrosis, hypotension, diastolic heart failure, acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards before and after dialysis treatments the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 dialysis residents (R3) sampled out of a total of 9 sampled residents.The facility did not provide monitoring of R3's fistula access dialysis site, monitoring of R3 post dialysis treatments, and R3's vitals as ordered.This is evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease dated October 2009, states: .Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care.Education and training staff includes, specifically:the nature and clinical management of ESRD.The type of assessment data that is to be gathered about the resident's condition on a daily or per shift basis.Signs and symptoms of worsening condition and/or complications of ESRD.How to recognize and intervene in medical emergencies such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less for 1 error out of 10 medication opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 10%. This had the potential to affect 1 of 1 resident (R) observed for medication administration. (R10) ~ R10 received topical medication without prior measurement for correct dosing. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated December 2009, states: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The facility policy titled Administering Topical Medication, undated, states: Purpose: To ensure the safe, accurate, and compliant administration of topical medications in accordance with Wisconsin nursing home regulations, promoting resident safety and preventing medication errors. Administration of Topical MedicationsPerform hand hygiene . Apply medication a. Use thin, even layer unless otherwise ordered. b. Use applicator or glove hand.The packaging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes their quality of life. This occurred for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R29).R3 and R3's representative were not informed of audio and visual surveillance that had been placed in his room for his roommate, R29.R3 and R29, or their resident representatives, did not consent to the audio and visual surveillance.R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after a hospitalization for altered mental status and falls at home.R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) confirmed R3 scored 08/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R3 was appointed a guardian to assist with decision making.R3 was admitted to a room with R29. Prior to R3's admission, R29's activated power of attorney (POA) had placed a video monitoring camera in R29's room. R29's POA has access to observe both video and audio surveillance. The facility does not have access to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were revised to reflect residents' current needs and to provide the needed direction to staff in providing necessary care and services. The facility practice affected 1 of 4 resident (R2) care plans reviewed.The facility did not revise R2's care plan after each fall. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospitalization for increased confusion and falls at home. An elopement assessment was conducted on 02/05/26 and indicated no elopement risk. A fall assessment was conducted on 02/05/26 and indicated low fall risk.R2 scored 08/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition. R2's power of attorney (POA) was activated to assist with decision making.Surveyor reviewed R2's record and noted the following falls:-02/14/26, fall with major injury. Sent to ER and hospitalized for fractured pelvis.-02/18/26, fall in room. New intervention on eINTERACT form, Call for Help sign.-02/21/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement policies that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property and includes the screening of prospective employees and residents. 16 out of 17 sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) O, CNA P, CNA Q, Social Worker (SW) F, Dietary Manager (DM) E, Activities Director (AD) I, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R), CNA W, CNA GG, CNA HH, CNA G, CNA II, Dietary Aide (DA) JJ, Business Office (BO) KK, Registered Nurse (RN) LL, and LPN K did not receive a full background check, which includes the Background Information Disclosure (BID), Department of Justice (DOJ) criminal background response and State of Wisconsin Caregiver Background Check - Government Findings Reports (previously IBIS) reviewed. 1 out of 17 staff reviewed (CNA G) previously lived in another state and the background check was not completed for that state. Incomplete background checks could impact all 47 residents residing at facility. With incomplete background checks the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 69 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a registered nurse (RN) worked at the facility for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, on 3 of 92 days reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 47 residents.The facility was unable to provide documentation to support that an RN was working in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours on 08/15/25, 09/08/25, and 09/09/25.This is evidenced by:Surveyor reviewed the PBJ Staffing Data Report for fiscal year Quarter 4 2025 (July 1 - September 30) which triggered for 4 or more days within the quarter with no RN hours on 08/15/2025, 09/08/25, 09/09/25 and 09/14/25.Surveyor reviewed the facility staff scheduled and nurse posting for the last 92 days of Quarter 4 2025 (July 1- September 30). Surveyor noted on 08/15/2025 (Friday), 09/08/25 (Monday), and 09/09/25 (Tuesday) there was not an RN scheduled for 8 consecutive hours. On 01/14/26 at 10:05 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA A) and the Assistant Nursing Home Administrator (ANHA B) regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure safe storage and labeling of foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 47 of 47 residents which could result in residents consuming unsafe foods with biological, chemical, or physical contamination. Facility's dry storage area contained packages of food opened, not in labeled containers and without a use by date identified on packaging.Refrigerator in resident common area contained opened dishes of food without resident identification, date opened or use by dates. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Food Receiving and Storage, revised 12/2008, states in part: Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated ('use by' date) .All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ('use by' date). On 01/11/2026 at 9:08 AM, Surveyor observed an opened package of yellow cake mix sitting on top of a box on shelf in kitchen dry food storage area. The cake mix's packaging was not labeled with date opened, or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all garbage and refuse was properly contained inside dumpsters to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing at facility.This is evidenced by: On 01/11/2026 at 9:27 AM, Surveyor observed several bags of garbage on the ground next to dumpsters located outside and near kitchen back door. On 01/11/2026 at 9:27 AM, Surveyor asked Dietary Manager (DM) E what facility policy was for disposal of garbage. DM E stated none of the bags observed on the ground was disposal from the kitchen. DM E stated the bags observed were left there by other staff, namely nursing, and it happened every day. DM E stated administration has been made aware on several occasions this was happening.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections which had the potential to affect all 47 residents.-Staff did not sanitize mechanical lift after transferring a resident on enhanced barrier precautions.-Hand hygiene not offered to residents prior to meals.-Lack of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) worn in isolation rooms.-No Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for resident with indwelling catheter.-No droplet precautions for resident COVID positive.-Improper hand hygiene with cares-Dirty linens placed on the floor-Urinary catheter lying on the floorFindings include: Facility policy titled, Policies and Practices-Infection Control, last revised July 2014, reads in part: This facility's infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure abuse training was provided at hire and annually for 9 of 9 staff reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 47 residents in the facility who are cared for by staff who did not receive ongoing training on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) W was hired 10/1/20 and no abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training was provided to the Surveyor for CNA W upon hire or annually.CNA GG was hired 10/20/25 and no abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training was provided to the Surveyor for CNA GG upon hire.CNA HH was hired 1/5/26 and no abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training was provided to the Surveyor for CNA HH upon hire.CNA G was hired 7/2/24 and no abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training was provided to the Surveyor for CNA G upon hire or annually.CNA II was hired 1/9/26 and no abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation training was provided to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure residents/representatives received notice of bed-hold policy indicating reserve payment and did not receive notice before indicating specific reason for the transfer/discharge for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R7, R8, R14, and R43).Example 1 R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/10/25, R43 scored 15/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. R43 was transferred to the hospital on 1/5/26. Surveyor noted a summary that was sent with R43 upon transfer. On 1/12/25 at 12:11 PM, Social Worker F reported she does not have bed-hold notice for R43's hospital transfer. Example 2 R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/05/26, Brief Interview for Mental status score was 9/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 01/07/26, R8 was admitted to the hospital for hip pain in relation to injury of unknown origin. There was no bed hold notice provided to R8 or representative related to transfer to hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain a system to account for disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for 25 residents (R25, R7, R34, R48, R22, R30, R21, R14, R26, R50, R62, R60, R44, R4, R16, R23, R36, R20, R15, R5, R19, R61, R2, R45, R55) of 25 residents reviewed for controlled substance reconciliation in a sample of 47 residents at facility. The facility's narcotic count reconciliation for the month of January 2026 does not have documentation of oncoming and outgoing nursing staff reconciling controlled substances at each shift change. The facility's policy, titled Controlled Substances, revised 4/2007, states in part: Nursing staff must count controlled drugs at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. They must document and report any discrepancies. On 01/12/2026 at 10:00 AM, Surveyor observed facility's medication storage and labeling system. The facility has two locked narcotic carts located in hallways outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not obtain written consents, explaining medication risks and benefits, options, and alternatives when psychotropic medications were initiated. The facility practices affected 2 of 5 residents (R) reviewed for unnecessary medications, R26 and R50.This is evidenced by:Example 1R26 was admitted to facility on 12/19/25 with diagnoses that include dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. R26 has an activated power of attorney.R26's physician orders include the following psychotropic medications: Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 25 MG (Antipsychotic). Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day initiated on 12/23/2025. Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 100 MG (Antidepressant). Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for depression initiated on 12/24/2025 Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Antianxiety). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Anxiety Initiated on 12/19/25 and Discontinued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not determine if self-administration of medications is clinically appropriate for 1 resident (R65) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 16 residents. R65's medical record did not have documentation by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) determining R65, or a family representative, was safe to self-administer medications, or had demonstrated self-administration of medications.R65 did not have a physician's order to self-administer medications.R65's care plan did not have interventions in place for self-administration of medications, or a family member to administer medications to R65.R65's medications were not in a locked box while being stored in R65's room. This is evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Administering Medications, revised 12/2009, states in part: Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Team, has determined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from misappropriation for 1 of 1 resident (R29).-On 01/07/26, the facility was made aware R29 was missing personal property, including $80.00.-The facility did not protect R29 from misappropriation.-The facility did not report this to the State Agency (SA).-The facility did not begin an investigation until 01/09/26.-The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation of R29's missing property.-The facility was unable to locate R29's missing property.The facility policy titled, Abuse prevention, read in part, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation.3. Develop and implement policies and procedures to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents.4. Require staff training/orientation programs that include such topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, and handling verbally or physically aggressive resident behavior. 6. Identify and assess all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility must ensure each resident is free from unnecessary drugs as evidenced by completing adequate drug monitoring for 2 of 5 residents (R) (R26 and R50) reviewed for unnecessary medication reviews.The facility is not accurately monitoring resident-specific targeted behaviors for R26 or R50's psychotropic medication use. This is evidenced by: Example 1R26 was admitted to facility on 12/19/25 with diagnoses that include dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. R26 has an activated power of attorney.R26's physician orders include the following psychotropic medications: Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 25 MG (Antipsychotic). Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day initiated on 12/23/2025. Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 100 MG (Antidepressant). Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for depression initiated on 12/24/2025 Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Anti-anxiety). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Anxiety Initiated on 12/19/25 and Discontinued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report a reasonable suspicion of a crime to law enforcement or report an allegation of misappropriation to the state agency for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed. -On 01/07/26, the facility was made aware R29 was missing personal property, including $80.00.-The facility did not report this to the State Agency (SA).-The facility did not begin an investigation until 01/09/26.-The facility did not report an allegation of misappropriation to law enforcement or the Ombudsman.The facility policy titled, Abuse prevention, read in part, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation.3. Develop and implement policies and procedures to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents.4. Require staff training/orientation programs that include such topics as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, and handling verbally or physically aggressive resident behavior. 6. Identify and assess all possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 2 of 2 residents (R8 and R29).-On 01/07/26, the facility was made aware R29 was missing personal property, including $80.00. -The facility did not begin an investigation until 01/09/26.-The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation of R29's missing property, by conducting staff or resident interviews.-The facility was unable to locate R29's missing property.-R8 was found to have a pelvic fracture and no root cause.-The facility did not investigate the cause by conducting further staff interviews and interviewing R8 or representative.-The facility did not complete education to all staff per intervention related to incident.The facility policy titled, Abuse prevention, read in part, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation.3. Develop and implement policies and procedures to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents.4. Require staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives necessary care and services upon admission for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (R58, R27).-Orders for wound care were not implemented upon admission-Orders for Cochlear Implants not followed upon admissionFindings include:Example 1R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].admission orders include:Lower spine-Cleanse with normal saline, apply foam dressing to spine for protection once a day on AM shift.Sacrum-Clean with normal saline or wound cleaner, pat dry, apply leptospermum honey, cover with border gauze dressing once a day on AM shift.On 01/12/26 at 7:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed R58. R58 stated the bandages were not changed the first few days since admission.Surveyor reviewed physician orders in R58's electronic health record (EHR). R58's EHR indicated the sacrum orders were entered on 01/07/26 and treatment started on 01/09/26. Lower spine orders were entered on 01/11/26 and treatment started on 01/12/26.Surveyor reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a second Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R9).-R9's PASARR I indicated R9 has a serious mental illness and has exceeded the 30-day exemption period requiring a PASARR II.Findings include:R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short-term rehab.Pertinent diagnosis includes depression with medications including fluoxetine and Depakote.A PASARR I was completed upon admission (no date) and reads in part: Resident is suspected of having a serious mental illness, with a Provider response of agree. Hospital discharge exemption- 30 day maximum, with an answer of yes.R9 has exceeded the 30-day exemption and no PASARR II has been completed.On 01/14/26 at 9:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) J. DON J stated R9 was to only have been at the facility for 30 days or less for therapy. DON J stated the facility would be submitting paperwork for the PASARR II immediately. DON J…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident to include instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident for 1 resident (R65) of 1 resident reviewed for baseline care plans in a sample of 16 residents. R65 did not have a baseline care plan in place within 48 hours of admission to include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for him, including, but not limited to, the ability for R65 to self-administer medications.This is evidenced by: State Operations Manual (SOM) 42 CFR 483.21 (a)(1), effective 11/28/2017, states in part: The facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan must - (i) be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission (ii) include the minimum healthcare information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with resident rights including services to attain or maintain the resident's highest or practicable physical, mental or psychosocial needs for 2 of 15 residents reviewed (R2 and R27).-R2's care plan was not developed after R2 had a significant weight loss.-R27's care plan did not include possible complications of using R27's left arm for blood pressure, labs, etc. due to dialysis graft.Example 1 The facility's policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive, read in part, 3. Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to: a. Incorporate identified problem areas; b. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; c. Build on the resident's strengths; d. Reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals; e. Reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes; f. Identify the professional services that are responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 of 15 residents (R61, R27) who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition.-R61 did not receive set up assistance for meal while in bed.-R27 did not receive supervision or set up assistance with meal while in bed.Findings include:Facility policy titled, Resident Nutrition Services, last revised 12/2009, reads in part: Each resident shall receive the correct diet, with preferences accommodated as feasible and shall receive prompt meal service and appropriate feeding assistance.Facility policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive, last revised 12/2009, reads in part: Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to incorporate identified problem areas.Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems.Aid in preventing or reducing declines in the resident's functional status and/or functional levels.Example 1R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide weekend activities, which has the potential to affect all 47 residents.No activities offered on the weekend.Findings include:On 01/11/26 at 10:14 AM, Surveyor interviewed R55. R55 stated there were no activities on the weekend due to only one activity person that only works weekdays.Surveyor observed the activity calendar posted in the hallway between the front entrance and the nurse's station. The calendar stated there was to be a card game at 2:00 PM.On 01/11/26 at 2:00 PM, Surveyor observed no activities were taking place.On 01/11/26 at 2:22 PM, Surveyor interviewed R4. R4 stated there are no activities on the weekend days. R4 stated Activity Director (AD) I only works on weekdays.On 01/11/26 at 2:28 PM, Surveyor interviewed R10. R10 stated that on weekends, R10 and other residents must make their own activities as AD I only works on weekdays. R10 stated the calendar says there are activities on the weekends, but they haven't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide care and treatment by professional standards of practice to maintain a resident's highest practicable level of physical well-being for 2 of 15 residents (R29 and R62).-The facility did not follow physician orders to monitor R29's blood pressure.-The facility did not follow orders to assess and provide dressing changes to R62's lower extremities. R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis including chronic osteomyelitis, right ankle and foot, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcerations, sepsis, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with necrosis of bone, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left foot with necrosis of bone. On 1/9/26, a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R62 did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) completed. Surveyor requested physician's orders. Documentation the facility provided in R62's order summary report did not include wound care treatment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident's environment remains free of accident hazards and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 4 residents (R3 and R50) reviewed. -R3 was assessed as an elopement risk and care planned to have a wanderguard on her left wrist. It was observed R3 did not have a wanderguard on. -R50 was observed being transferred without a gait belt as care planned.Example 1 The facility policy titled, Wandering, Unsafe Resident, read in part, 1. The staff will identify residents who are at risk for harm because of unsafe wandering (including elopement). 3. The resident's care plan will indicate the resident is at risk for elopement or other safety issues. 4. Interventions to try and maintain safety will be included in the resident's care plan.R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and dementia. On 12/17/25, a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not provide appropriate care and treatment to prevent complications for 2 out of 4 residents (R) reviewed for bowel and/or bladder. (R60, R35)-R60's indwelling urinary was not secured and catheter drainage bag was connected to bed frame. Catheter tubing was pulled tightly during repositioning of the resident lying in the bed.-R35 was not toileted in a timely manner and according to care plan.Example 1 Facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, revised April 2010, states in part, Infection Control . b. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 2. Ensure that the catheter remains secured with a securement device such as a leg strap to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malnutrition, syncope and collapse, age related osteoporosis, and atrial fibrillation. Orders include, Foley catheter care every shift and as needed. On 1/12/26 at 10:13 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 out of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for nutrition. -The facility did not notify R2's provider or a registered dietician of R2's weight loss. Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, which read in part, Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietician in writing. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, chronic pain, vitamin D deficiency, reduced mobility, chronic kidney disease, and adult failure to thrive. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 12/11/25 confirmed R2 scored 15/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. R2's care plan included: -Resistive to care, 11/26/25. Refused weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement appropriate interventions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R27) to ensure resident receives care and services as it relates to dialysis consistent with professional standards of practice.-R27 did not have orders/care plan instructions in place related to the left arm fistula regarding blood pressure.Findings include:Facility policy titled, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, last revised 12/2009, reads in part: Education and training of staff includes, specifically: The care of shunts and fistulas.The resident's care plan will reflect the resident's needs related to dialysis care.R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].On 12/16/25, R27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment.R27's care plan includes a focus of: R27 needs dialysis related to End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), dialysis graft to left arm with interventions to check and change dressing, monitoring site, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less for 2 residents (R65, R61) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 16 residents. R65 received a medication after breakfast was eaten that was ordered to be given before breakfast.R61 received an incomplete dose of insulin based on physician orders for sliding scale insulin according to blood glucose levels. A medication error rate of 8% occurred on 01/12/2026 during observation of medication administration. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 12/2009, states in part: Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame.The individual administering the medication must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 of 4 residents (R10, R55, R58, R61) reviewed were free from significant medication errors.-R58 who has multiple upper respiratory concerns, did not receive nebulizer treatments on time/as ordered.-R61 did not receive insulin and other medications at the correct time.-R10 and R55 were given medications late. Findings include: Facility Policy titled, Administering Medications, last revised December 2009, reads in part: Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame.Medications may not be prepared in advance and must be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified.The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. Example 1 R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. No Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all drugs for resident self-administration was stored in a locked compartment in resident room for 1 resident (R65) of 4 residents reviewed for safe medication administration in a sample of 16 residents. R65 kept prescription medications in a closet in room, which is not a locked unit, for self-administration.R65's care plan has no interventions in place for safe and secure storage of personal medications in roomThis is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Storage of Medication, revised 4/2007, states in part: Compartments (including but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms.boxes) containing drugs.shall be locked when not in use. Wisconsin State Legislature, DHS 132.65(6)(b)(1) Storage and labeling medications, states in part: Medications shall be stored near nurse's stations, in locked cabinets, closets or rooms. R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate documentation in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (R58).-Respiratory Assessments were documented completed and were not.-Documentation air mattress was checked/working and no air mattress on bed.Findings include:R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].No Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score available for cognition. R58 is R58's own person.Physician orders include nebulizer assessment-record findings using code and record number of minutes spent on assessment and treatment. Orders also include device: low air loss mattress to bed, check function every shift.On 01/11/26 at 10:57 AM, Surveyor interviewed R58. R58 reported when receiving nebulizer treatments, the nurses are not performing respiratory assessments before or after the treatment is administered. R58 stated, I haven't seen a stethoscope since I've been here.On 01/12/26 at 12:45 PM, Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain documentation of screening, education, offering and/or declination of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines to 2 residents (R44, R65) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 17 residents. R44 had no documentation of screening, education on, or acceptance/declination for receiving influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations.R65 had no documentation of screening, education, or acceptance/declination for receiving influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations.This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Influenza Vaccine, revised 08/2008, states in part: All residents and employees who have direct contact with residents will be offered the influenza vaccine annually.Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents.Prior to vaccination, the resident.will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine.For those who receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain documentation of screening, education, offering and/or declination of the Coronavirus 19 (COVID) vaccination to 2 residents (R44, R65) of 5 residents reviewed for COVID immunization in a sample of 17 residents. R44 had no documentation of screening, education on, or acceptance/declination for receiving a COVID vaccination when known positive cases of COVID were present in facility at time of admission. R44 tested positive for COVID 10 days after admission.R65 had no documentation of screening, education, or acceptance/declination for receiving a COVID vaccination when known positive cases of COVID were present in facility at time of admissionFacility did not develop and implement policies and procedures regarding the COVID 19 vaccine immunizationThis is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled COVID-19 Policy, revised 05/11/2023, states in part: It is recommended that everyone remain up to date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure 2 out of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), (CNA W, CNA G), employed at the facility for more than one year received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training each year. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents in the facility. CNA W's date of hire is 10/01/20, and the facility did not provide 12 hours of in-service training. CNA G's date of hire is 07/02/24, and the facility did not provide 12 hours of in-service training.This is evidenced by: S483.95 Training Requirements state:Training topics must include but are not limited to-S483.95(g) Required in-service training for nurse aides.In-service training must-S483.95(g)(1) Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year.S483.95(g)(2) Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training.S483.95(g)(3) Address areas of weakness as determined in nurse aides' performance reviews and facility assessment at S483.71 and may address the special needs of residents as determined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not consult with a physician when unable to obtain a wound VAC (vacuum assisted closure) and vancomycin solution, as ordered per hospital discharge instructions, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1). R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 2:30 PM, after a hospitalization for sepsis related to necrotizing fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene (gangrene affecting the external genitalia or perineum), of the right groin. R1 scored 12/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition.R1 was hospitalized from [DATE]-[DATE]. R1 suffered a stroke during her hospitalization, was intubated, and required mechanical ventilation, R1 was successfully extubated prior to her discharge from the hospital. During R1's hospitalization, she required multiple debridements of right groin wound, and extensive antibiotic therapy. A Foley catheter was placed to keep the area clean. Last noted wound measurements were on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented for each resident (R) within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1).R1 was admitted with a non-pressure related wound and wound care orders; a baseline care plan for wound care was not developed. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 2:30 PM, after a hospitalization for sepsis related to necrotizing fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene (gangrene affecting the external genitalia or perineum), of the right groin. R1 scored 12/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition.R1 was hospitalized from [DATE]-[DATE]. R1 suffered a stroke during her hospitalization, was intubated, and required mechanical ventilation, R1 was successfully extubated prior to her discharge from the hospital. During R1's hospitalization, she required multiple debridements of right groin wound, and extensive antibiotic therapy. A Foley catheter was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for quality of care (R1).-R1 did not receive wound care as ordered.-The facility did not order R1's wound VAC (vacuum assisted closure), as ordered.-The facility did not implement a baseline care plan related to R1's wounds.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 2:30 PM, after a hospitalization for sepsis related to soft tissue injury of necrotizing fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene (gangrene affecting the external genitalia or perineum), of the right groin. R1 scored 12/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition.R1 was hospitalized from [DATE]-[DATE]. R1 suffered a stroke during her hospitalization and was intubated. During R1's hospitalization, she required multiple debridements of right groin wound, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility did not designate a registered nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents in the facility. The facility's Director of Nursing is not a registered nurse. Findings: The State Operations Manual (SOM), Appendix PP states, except when waived under paragraph (f) or (g) of this section, the facility must designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis.On 11/17/25, Surveyor investigated a complaint the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) was a licensed practical nurse (LPN) and not a registered nurse (RN) as required. Surveyor reviewed the facility's complaints since 07/05/25, including the following during which time an LPN (current DON B) was serving as the DON.-07/15/25, a complaint investigation was completed by the State Agency (SA), resulting in citations related to pharmacy services and food procurement. -09/02/25, a complaint investigation was completed by the SA, resulting in citations for concerns related to catheter care at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0731 — widespreadRequest a waiver if it can't meet the nurse staffing requirements.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not request a waiver when unable to meet the requirements of recruiting appropriate personnel. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents in the facility.The facility did not request a waiver when unable to recruit a registered nurse for the Director of Nurse's position.Findings include:The facility requested a waiver related to the requirement for the Director of Nursing (DON) be a registered nurse. Waiver was requested on 10/22/25. DON H resigned from her DON position on 07/05/25. The facility had been without a registered nurse as the DON since 07/05/25.On 10/22/25, the State Agency (SA) denied the facility's request and asked the facility to provide evidence of the following:-S483.35(f)(1) The facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the State that the facility has been unable, despite diligent efforts (including offering wages at the community prevailing rate for nursing facilities), to recruit appropriate personnel. -S483.35(f)(2) The State determines that a waiver of the requirement will not endanger the health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure all portions of the call light system were working properly. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents. The facility's call light system was not working at the nurse's station. The call light system's auditory alarms were not working. Findings include: On 11/17/25 at 9:02 AM, Surveyor observed call lights on the 400 hall were activated and not sounding. Surveyor then observed call lights were activated but not sounding on all resident halls of the facility, 100, 200, 300, and 400. Surveyor observed the call light system at the nurse's station was not lit up and or alerting staff call lights were activated. On 11/17/25 at 9:27 AM, Surveyor received electronic communication from Ombudsman F there were concerns related to call light wait times. On 11/17/25 at 9:54 AM, Surveyor interviewed R3. R3 reported the facility's call light system had not been working for about five weeks, and stated the nurses are not notified of call lights at the nurse's station and the call lights do not alarm. R3 stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility licensed staff failed to ensure that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was provided when resident was found unresponsive for one of three residents (Resident (R)1) reviewed for deaths out of a total sample of 11 residents. This failure had the potential to decrease the chance of survival for residents who required CPR. Findings include:Review of R1's admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 was discharged from the facility on [DATE] to a funeral home. R1 had diagnoses of gram-positive bacteremia (bacteria in the bloodstream), Parkinson's disease, seizure disorder or epilepsy, and difficulty in walking. Record review of R1's undated Clinical Physician Orders located in the EMR under the Orders tab, reflected an order entered on [DATE] for Full Code-CPR (the healthcare team will perform CPR and all possible life-saving measures in the event of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to enter orders and/or document routine flushes, dressing changes, and monitoring for complications of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) single lumen line (a thin, flexible tube that delivers treatments through a vein) for one of one resident (Resident (R)1) reviewed for intravenous (IV) medication out of a total of 12 residents. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of line occlusion, infections, and unnoticed complications. Findings include:Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/02/25, located under the MDS tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of gram-positive bacteremia (bacteria in the bloodstream). R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected that R1 had an IV access placed and IV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as scheduled for two of five residents (Resident (R)2 and R5) reviewed for pharmacy services out of a total sample of 11 residents. Failure to administer medications at the prescribed intervals between doses had the potential for increased side effects for residents who were administered the same medication several times a day.Findings include:1. Review of R2's undated admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, and unspecified urinary incontinence.Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/23/25, located under the MDS tab in the EMR revealed R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure Vancomycin (antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections) was administered as ordered resulting in two missed doses for one of five residents (Resident (R)1) reviewed for significant medication errors out of a total sample of 11 residents. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of serious complications from untreated sepsis such as organ damage and/or death, especially in critically ill patients.Findings include:Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/02/25 located under the MDS tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of gram-positive bacteremia (bacteria in the bloodstream). R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected that R1 had an intravenous (IV) access placed and IV antibiotics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to identify and investigate an adverse event and develop a corrective plan to include staff education after one of one residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for an adverse event of an unwitnessed fall was found with a potential injury of unknown origin with her chin and neck against the bed frame and her lower body on the floor, unresponsive, and required Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) per her code status out of a total sample of 11 residents. This failure had the potential to affect the health and well-being of residents susceptible to accidents, incidents, and injuries from unknown origins.Findings include:Review of R1's admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 was discharged from the facility on [DATE] to a funeral home. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] and located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide Notice of Bedhold, Notice of Transfer and did not notify the Ombudsman of residents who transferred from the facility to a hospital for 3 of 3 residents (R) (R1, R3 and R4).Example 1 R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has an Activated Power of Attorney. On 07/23/25, R1 had a change in condition as a result of a fall resulting in need to be transferred to the hospital for evaluation. A Bedhold, Notice of Transfers was not provided to R1's representative and the facility did not notify the Ombudsman of transfer. On 08/17/25, R1 had a change in condition as a result of a fall resulting in need to be transferred to the hospital for evaluation. A Bedhold, Notice of Transfers was not provided to R1's representative and the facility did not notify the Ombudsman of transfer. Example 2 R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a legal guardian. On 08/27/25, R3 had a change in condition and was transferred to the hospital. A Bedhold,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed (R1).-Medication storage room had R1's lorazepam, with an opened date of 12/01/24, stored in unlocked refrigerator.-Medication storage room had 2 open, unlabeled bottles of eye drops in refrigerator.-Medication storage room had 4 opened boxes of expired intermittent catheters.This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, with a revised date of 04/2007, states in part: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use.9. Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses's station or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure continued monitoring of food's internal temperature. This has the potential to affect all 58 residents (R) in the facility.The facility policy, titled Food Temperatures, states: The temperature of all food items will be taken and properly recorded prior to service of each meal. Under the section labeled Procedures it states: 1. All hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit.On 07/15/25, Surveyor reviewed the facility Resident Council Meeting Minutes from May 13, 2025, which indicated concerns with food coming out late. Surveyor reviewed kitchen food logs, which show food temperatures are taken at the beginning and end of service with no concerns noted.On 07/16/25 at 8:55 AM, Surveyor observed kitchen staff load 1st tray for 300/400 hall into cart. Food service started in the 300 hallway. At 9:27 AM, the cart was pushed to 400 wing and last tray served at 9:32 AM to R7.Surveyor had requested a test tray and checked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services that ensure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals reviewed for 2 or 4 sampled residents (R), R1 and R2The facility did not ensure that medication orders were transcribed accurately. R1 received wrong dose of medication. The facility did not ensure that medication was given according to physician orders. R2 did not receive medications on 2 occasions in the last 45 days. This is evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Administering Medication by MED-PASS, last revised December 2009 states, 3. Medication must be administered in accordance with the orders, including required time frame. 15. If a drug is withheld, refuse, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the MAR space provided for that drug dose.Example 1R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after R1 fell at home and broke R1's hip, requiring surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure the facility-wide assessment was updated to reflect current resident care needs or the resources needed to support the resident care needs. The facility did not use the facility assessment to inform staffing decisions to ensure there are a sufficient number of staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to care for its residents' needs prior to increasing the census. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility assessment must reflect the resident population and the resources needed to care for this population. The facility assessment must be reviewed at least annually and as needed if the facility plans or population would require substantial modifications. Facility assessment, date revised 01/01/25, identified the reason for change to the facility assessment on 01/01/25 was updated ownership. The section of the assessment on resident population identified an average daily census of 37. The census time period was left blank. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper sanitization and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness for all 28 residents (R). Serving utensil was left in thickener powder. Cooks were observed grabbing ready to eat food with gloved hands, after touching non-sanitized food surfaces, and placing the ready to eat food on plates for residents to eat. Cooks were observed not changing gloves and washing hands after touching non-sanitized food surfaces. Cooks did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes during food service. Cook did not wear hair restraint and/or correctly when entering kitchen, preparing, or serving food. Food (milk) placed in kitchen refrigerator had been opened but was not labeled with an opened date, resulting in the potential for foodborne illnesses to spread. Food items for resident consumption were not labeled with open or discard date. Findings include: Facility policy entitled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices F812, effective 10/23, states Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately report to the resident's physician when a resident had difficulty breathing and was transferred via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to the Emergency Department (ED). This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed, (R21). Findings include: R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, essential hypertension, edema, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and dilated cardiomyopathy. On 10/01/24 at 6:45 AM, Surveyor noticed R21 not in R21's room. Surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) F and asked where R21 was as Surveyor did not observe R21 in R21's room. RN F indicated that R21 had been having some shortness of breath and difficulty breathing the last few days and was finally sent out in the middle of the night via EMS. Review of R21's medical record identified the following note: - .On 10/01/24 at 1:39 AM, Resident sent to Hospital ED for difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not conduct a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II screen for R7, who has a serious mental disorder and is taking psychotropic medication to treat symptoms of major mental disorder to ensure he received care and services to meet his needs. The facility practice affected 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed. This is evidenced by: According to the State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS), PASRR is a federal requirement that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be assessed to determine whether they might have an intellectual/developmental disability (ID/DD) and/or mental illness. This is a Level I Screen. The purpose of a Level I Screen is to identify individuals whose total needs require they receive additional services for their ID/DD and/or mental illness. Individuals who test positive at Level I are then evaluated in depth to confirm the determination of an ID/DD and/or mental illness for PASRR purposes. This is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (PI) (R21) received care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing of PIs. R21 was at risk for PI development and has existing PIs. The facility failed to apply purple boots for off-loading heels as ordered and did not do thorough admission and weekly PI skin assessments. Findings include: R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, congestive heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, diabetes mellitus type 2 with underlying condition with foot ulcer, cellulitis of right and left lower limb, edema, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and dilated cardiomyopathy. R21 was admitted with 7 pressure injuries and facility did not identify location, sizes, or stages and is unclear determining the condition of the pressure injuries on admission. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/15/24, identified R21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not provide the needed services in attempt to maintain R10's mobility. The facility practice has the potential to affect 1 of 3 residents (R), R10, reviewed for limited range of motion and mobility. This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested the facility policy regarding restorative or maintenance programs at the facility. Director of Nursing (DON) B informed surveyor the facility does not have a maintenance or restorative program at the facility and has not for some time due to various reasons. The facility does not have a policy specific to maintenance or restorative programing. Surveyor reviewed R10's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) which was a quarterly (MDS) completed on 8/22/24. The MDS notes R10 understands and is understood. R10 does not reject care. R10 has no range of motion impairments and requires supervision with transfers. Ambulation noted as has not been attempted. Surveyor reviewed R10's program that read: Restorative Carryover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible for 1 of 1 resident (R) R19, reviewed with indwelling catheters. Findings: The facility policy titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheters, read in part .A resident who enters the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that the catheter was necessary. 1. If the resident has an indwelling urinary catheter, complete the assessment upon admission, quarterly, and with change. 2. Document the reason the catheter is being utilized based on the following: a. Resident has an acute urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction. 1. Changing indwelling catheters at routine, fixed intervals are not recommended. Rather, it is suggested to change catheters based on clinical indications such as infection, obstruction, or when the closed system is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on random observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and help to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 residents (R) (R17 and R25). Example 1 The facility policy entitled F880 Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) last revised on 3/2024, states under definition of EBP, The use of gown and gloves for high-contact resident care activities is indicated, when contact precautions do not otherwise apply, for nursing home residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO colonization as well as for residents with MDRO infection or colonization. On 10/01/24 at 7:46 AM, Surveyor observed during med pass with Registered Nurse (RN) J, an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign on R17's room door directing staff to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) of gown and gloves. Surveyor asked RN J reason for EBP signage. RN J stated R17 has an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when an allegation of verbal abuse was not reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to local law enforcement in accordance with state law through established procedures. The facility practice affected 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed. (R1). This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy regarding reporting suspicion of a crime. The policy titled Reporting Abuse Allegations which was dated as last approved on 11/2023 indicated the following: Policy: all suspected violations and all substantiated incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation will immediately be reported to appropriate state agencies or individuals as may be required by law. Crime is defined by law of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse. The facility practice affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R1). Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility policies for the abuse prohibition program as follows: Abuse Prevention Program, Training which was dated 9/2023. The policy does not address the facility's investigation process. Abuse Prevention Program which was dated 9/2023. The policy in part reads: Abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment . Comprehensive policies and procedures have been developed to aid the facility administration in preventing abuse, neglect or mistreatment. The abuse prevention program provides policies and procedures that govern at a minimum: timely and thorough investigations of all reports of abuse including reporting of crimes. The current seven components of CMS directed abuse condition of participation are located in separate policies and procedures listed below:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked at the facility for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, on 3 of 5 days reviewed on Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 3 2023 (April 1-June 30, 2023). This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility did not have a RN working in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours on 04/25/23 (Tuesday), 05/13/23 (Saturday), and 05/14/23 (Sunday). This is evidenced by: The Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 483.35 (b) states, in part: . except when waived, the facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 hours a day; 7 days a week. On 10/23/23, Surveyor at entrance requested from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A the staff postings, the daily staff assignments, and the nursing schedules for April 1 through June 30, 2023. On 10/25/23, Surveyor interviewed NHA A about the PBJ Staffing Report regarding the no RN working at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-25 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the mandatory staffing data that had been submitted from 04/01/23-06/30/23 was complete, accurate, and auditable. This has the ability to affect all 30 residents in the facility. The submitted data from 01/01/22-03/31/23 was not complete, accurate, or auditable. This is evidenced by: The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Reports that were generated quarterly document that the facility triggered No RN Hours for the dates of 04/25 (TU); 05/13 (SA); 05/14 (SU); 05/28 (SU) 06/03 (SA) Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day for the dates of 04/01 (SA); 04/02 (SU); 04/03 (MO); 04/04 (TU); 04/06 (TH); 04/07 (FR); 04/08 (SA); 04/09 (SU); 04/10 (MO); 04/11 (TU); 04/12 (WE); 04/14 (FR); 04/15 (SA); 04/16 (SU); 04/17 (MO); 04/18 (TU); 04/20 (TH); 04/21 (FR); 04/22 (SA); 04/23 (SU); 04/24 (MO); 04/25 (TU); 04/26 (WE); 04/28 (FR); 04/29 (SA); 04/30 (SU); 05/01 (MO); 05/04 (TH); 05/05 (FR); 05/08 (MO); 05/09 (TU); 05/13 (SA); 05/14 (SU); 05/17 (WE); 05/18 (TH); 05/19 (FR); 05/23 (TU); 05/27 (SA); 05/28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not identify issues to which quality assessment and assurance activities are necessary or develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This has the potential to affect all 30 residents. The facility does not have a QAPI system in place and has failed to identify key areas of deficient practice and implement action plans to correct these deficient practices or identify areas needing improvement to develop, implement, monitor, and evaluate action plans to achieve specific goals to improve quality of care. This is evidenced by the following: The policy titled Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI,) was reviewed. The policy stated, in part, .QAPI Mission The facility will maintain an ongoing, facility wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems .The administrator is responsible for assuring that this facility's QAPI Program complies with federal, state and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide dementia management and abuse prevention training to all staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 30 residents (R) residing in the facility. The facility did not implement and maintain a dementia training program for all staff, as determined by the facility assessment. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Abuse Prevention Program, Training, revised 08/2022. This program reads, in part . Mandated staff training/orientation programs will be provided that include abuse prevention of all types, identification of abuse, recognizing signs and symptoms, reporting of abuse, and understanding behavioral symptoms that may lead to an increase in abuse. 1. At least, upon hire and annually each community employee will complete abuse in-service education. 4. Topics should include: d. Dementia management and understanding behavioral symptoms of residents that may increase the risk of abuse and neglect and how to respond. j. Conflict resolution and anger management skills, including .resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not implement procedures for reporting an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 resident (R9). R9's record confirmed three separate incidents of an injury of unknown origin not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator or the state Survey Agency (SA). Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility titled, Abuse Prevention Program, Training, Prevention of Abuse, and Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect (Identification), revised 08/2022. The policy reads in part . Abuse Prevention Program, Prevention of Abuse: The community staff will not condone any form of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment and will continually monitor the facility's policies, procedures, training programs, systems, etc., to assist in preventing resident abuse. 10. Provide staff with information on how to report suspected abuse without the fear of reprisal. Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect (Identification): To aid in abuse prevention all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not conduct a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for R5, who has a serious mental disorder to ensure he receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to his needs. The facility practice affected 1 of 2 residents reviewed (R5). R5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizoaffective disorder and cognitive and communication deficit. The facility did not complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) prior to his admission to ensure he receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to his needs. This is evidenced by: Surveyor reviewed R5's record and noted he was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizoaffective disorder and cognitive and communication deficit. Surveyor reviewed R5's record and could not locate a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). R5's orders include: 5/18/23 Haloperidol 10 mg at bedtime for schizoaffective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were updated for 1 of 12 residents (R22) reviewed. R22's care plan was not updated after two hospitalizations related to gastrointestinal bleed. This is evidenced by: R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R22's diagnoses include failure to thrive, malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, and weakness. R22's MDS completed on 10/04/23 confirmed R22 scored 15 during BIMS, indicating intact cognition. R22 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and 09/25/23 for gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. Surveyor reviewed R22's record which did not include a care plan related to bleeding or GI bleeding. Surveyor reviewed R22's [NAME] and certified nursing assistant (CNA) tasks and noted no care or monitoring related to bleeding or GI bleeding. On 10/24/23 at 3:29 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B. DON B acknowledged bleeding should have been included in R22's care plan.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 7 residents (R20, R27, R9, and R18) reviewed. R20 was observed to be maintaining her smoking materials, not using a smoking apron, or being provided supervision with smoking. R20's smoking assessment and care plan identify R20 is at risk for burns and requires supervision with smoking and R20's smoking materials to be secured. R27 was transferred by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E without use of a gait belt. R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicates R27 requires extensive assistance of 2 staff for transfers. Facility standard of practice indicates staff should use a gait belt with transfers. R9's care plan was not updated to include new interventions after multiple falls. R18's care plan was not updated to include new interventions after multiple falls. This is evidenced by:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not monitor resident weight status consistent with current standards of practice. The facility practice has the potential to affect an appropriate and prompt response to potential resident weight loss affecting 3 of 3 residents reviewed for weight loss (R81, R131 and R22). R81's weights were not obtained per the facility policy and standards of practice to ensure nutritional parameters were maintained. R81 did not have evidence of snacks being provided. R22 has a diagnosis of malnutrition and was identified by Registered Dietician (RD) C as having significant weight loss and was to be weighed weekly. R22's last weight was obtained on 10/12/23. R131 is a new admission to the facility on [DATE]. R131's last weight was obtained on 10/10/23. This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested and received the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention dated as effective 10/2023. The policy in part reads: Policy: The Interdisciplinary team will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received pharmaceutical services (accurate acquiring, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 2 of 12 residents (R18 and R22). R18 had a physician's order to administer D-Mannose. After R18 ran out of his medication the facility made no effort to obtain a new supply and reported this medication was brought in by family. R22 had a physician's order to administer Lidocaine Viscous Mouth solution. The facility did not receive the medication from the pharmacy and no efforts were made to obtain the medication for five days. This is evidenced by: Example 1 Surveyor reviewed facility policy titled Pharmacy Services, dated 09/2023. The policy reads in part . The facility shall contract with a licensed pharmacist to help obtain and maintain timely and appropriate pharmacy services. This includes .f. Help the facility assure that medications are requested, received, and administered in a timely manner.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure staff postings were posted daily and included total number of hours and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift which has the potential to affect 47 out of 47 residents residing at the facility.Review of staff postings did not reflect the accurate staffing numbers each day.On 01/11/2026 at 9:07 AM, upon entrance to facility Surveyor noted the Facility's Direct Care Report posted in lobby dated December 19, 2025: Census 47. On 01/13/2026, Surveyor received and reviewed the facility's schedules and staff postings from 12/01/25 through 01/13/26 and noted: Print date and actual time stamped at bottom of each page for time frame.Staff schedules were marked with changes on 12/16/25, 12/26/25, 12/29/25, 12/31/25, 01/01/26, 01/03/26, 01/04/26, 01/06/26, 01/11/26, 01/12/26, and 01/13/26.Staff posting did not reflect the accurate staffing numbers for 01/01/26, 01/03/26, 01/02/26, 12/16/25, 12/29/25, 12/31/25.On 01/14/26 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-25 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide residents who had a continued stay at the facility after their Medicare benefits were terminated, the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) and did not provide the Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode Start Date for 3 of 3 residents (R) R2, R11, R20 reviewed for notices. R2 did not receive an SNF ABN. Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode Start Date not provided. R11 did not receive an SNF ABN. Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode Start Date not provided. R20 did not receive an SNF ABN. Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode Start Date not provided. On 10/24/23, Surveyor reviewed three records for Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 10123 (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage- NOMNC) and CMS 10055 (Advance Beneficiary Notice) as follows: Example 1 R2's NOMNC signed by representative on 05/16/23. Verbal information given 05/15/23. There is no Medicare part A skilled services episode start date. Last covered day of Part A services: 05/17/23. No SNF ABN provided to resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-25 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Example 2: Surveyor reviewed R12's record and noted the following: 08/07/23 at 8:30 AM R12's Nurses Notes show resident breathing hard, nausea and vomiting episode, temp 97.1 with other vitals refused. NP (Nurse Practitioner) here and ordered transfer to ER (emergency room). 08/16/23 Resident returned to the facility. Surveyor could not locate a notice of transfer in R12's record. On 10/25/23 at 2:23 PM, Surveyor spoke with Registered Nurse/Care Coordinator (RN) D about the facility process for providing written notice of transfer to residents/resident representative and informing the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. RN D indicated she is responsible for notifying the ombudsman of transfers and was sending a report of residents who discharged from the facility but not hospital transfers thus the ombudsman has not been notified of resident transfers. RN D expressed she was unaware of need to complete a written transfer notice and no written transfer notice was provided with hospital transfers. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$42,834 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $12,438 — penalty dated 2025-09-03
- $13,595 — penalty dated 2025-04-22
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-10-02
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-31 for 30 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RHG HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 1 home this chain runs (chain average 1.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHG HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/14/2024 |
| LAMP POST HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/11/2025 |
| FRANKENBERG, SEAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2024 |
| GREENSPAN, CONNER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2024 |
| OXFORD FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 12/14/2024 |
| RELAVIX HEALTH GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2024 |
| RHGRE WI MICOQUA LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2024 |
| RAMNANAN, KESHNI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/11/2025 |
| ZAZESKI, JEANNIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2024 |
| OAK MEDICAL SC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2024 |
| RELAVIX REAL ESTATE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/11/2025 |
| HORTON, JAMES | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525678. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.