Pleasant View Nursing Home
N3150 Wi-81, Monroe, WI 53566 · Government - County · 96 certified beds · (608) 325-2171 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $225,807 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-04)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.7% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.6% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.4% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.3% | 5.7% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.7% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 16.9% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.9% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.9% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.1% | 15.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.5% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.1% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.0% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.80 | 1.66 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 2.29 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.1%CMS range 45.4–66.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.8–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.2–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 87.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.09 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.65 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-08-04 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately provide basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to a resident requiring emergency care for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for code status. This has the potential to affect 12 full code residents that reside in the facility. R1 is a full code and was found on the floor of his room unresponsive on [DATE]. A Registered Nurse (RN) failed to initiate CPR immediately, the facility failed to ensure that staff were competent in using basic life support equipment, and failed to ensure that there was always a CPR-certified staff member in the building.The facility's failure to provide immediate life saving measures to a resident who wished to have basic life support measures initiated such as CPR, failure to ensure that a CPR certified staff member was in the building at all times, failure to ensure all staff were aware of where lifesaving equipment was located and were able to demonstrate competency of basic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement (R58), 6 of 17 sampled residents (R2, R40, R59, R1, R66, R48) and 6 of 13 supplemental residents (R10, R31, R39, R45, R35, R50) reviewed for wandering, and 1 of 13 supplemental residents reviewed for accidents (R6). R58 has a history of multiple falls, exit seeking behaviors, and elopement. Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement when R58 was exit seeking. R58 exited through an alarmed door, took his wheelchair down a stairwell, and was found at the bottom of a flight of stairs. Although the door alarm activated and would have sounded for 15 seconds before the stairwell door opened, staff did not respond because there was no staff in the immediate area. When a staff person heard the alarm, the alert board, which indicates to staff which door was alarming, was not functioning, leading to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident (R1). This affected 3 of 6 residents (R4, R5, and R6) reviewed for abuse. R1 has a history of resident-to-resident incidents including punching a resident in the back (R4), punching a resident in the face, putting a resident in a choke hold and banging her head on the wall, hitting the resident in the head and chest and pushing her into a chair and grabbing her wrist. The facility failed to update R1's care plan with new interventions after the incidents to prevent further abuse. The facility failed to ensure that R1's line of sight monitoring was completed to prevent further incidents. The facility was aware of R1's behaviors of hitting, punching, grabbing, yelling, and swearing at other residents and staff. The facility's failure to care plan interventions and ensure that increased supervision was completed resulted in R1 abusing R5 and R6 creating a finding of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) were free from involuntary seclusion. The facility moved R1, R2, and R3 from the unit they resided on and placed them on a different unit within the facility. Facility staff erected a wall and placed R1, R2, and R3 behind this wall. R1, R2, and R3's families were not aware R1, R2, and R3 were being secured behind a wall isolating the residents from others in the facility. Using the reasonable person concept a resident would be fearful, anxious and feel dehumanized, when not afforded the individuality, compassion and civility as others who reside at the facility. As the Psychosocial Outcome Severity Guide, located in the Nursing Home Survey Resources Folder, describes, to apply the reasonable person concept, the survey team should determine the severity of the psychosocial outcome or potential outcome the deficiency may have had on a reasonable person in the resident's position (i.e., what degree of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (R35) of a total sample of 21. R35 has a history of multiple falls. Facility staff did not implement fall interventions. R35 had a fall that resulted in a right pubic rami fracture (pelvic fracture). This is evidenced by: R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease stage 4, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Spinal Stenosis, and Osteoporosis. R35's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/13/22 states that R35 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 4/15 indicating that R35 is severely cognitively impaired. Section G states that R35 requires extensive assist of 2 staff for bed mobility and transfers. R35's care plan dated 5/26/22 states in part, I: am at risk to fall down and hurt myself .I like a low bed with cushion, keep personal items within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not offer each resident influenza immunization, and the resident's medical record does not include documentation the resident either received, refused, or was educated on the risks and benefits of the influenza immunization for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for immunizations. R4's Activated Power of Attorney (APOA) signed the consent for the influenza vaccine, and there is no evidence that R4 received the immunization. Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Influenza Vaccination dated 7/1/25 states in part .7. Individuals receiving the influenza vaccine, or their legal representative, will be required to consent prior to the administration of the vaccine. The consent will be located in the resident's medical record. On 10/2/25, R4's APOA signed the facility's Influenza Vaccination Information and Release Form that states in part .I have read the above information about influenza and the flu vaccine, and the special precautions. I have had the opportunity to ask questions and understood the benefits and risks of flu…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure when COVID-19 vaccine is available to the facility, each resident and staff member is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident or staff member has already been immunized for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed. R3 did not receive the 2025-2026 COVID-19 Vaccine. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure titled, COVID-19 Vaccination, implemented 11/10/25, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) by educating and offering our residents and staff the COVID-19 vaccine. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for the prevention of COVID-19 disease and its complications as follows: a. Adults ages 65 years and older: Vaccination based on individual-based decision-making. 5. For individuals who are not immunocompromised,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for 5 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed.CNA F did not have an annual performance evaluation completed timely. CNA W did not have an annual performance evaluation completed timely. CNA X did not have an annual performance evaluation completed timely. CNA Y did not have an annual performance evaluation completed timely.CNA Z did not have an annual performance evaluation completed timely. This is evidenced by:The Facility's policy titled Performance Evaluations revised September 2020 states, in part: Policy Statement: The job performance of each employee shall be reviewed and evaluated at least annually.Example 1CNA F's hire date was 5/9/23. CNA F's previous annual performance evaluation was completed on 5/9/24. CNA F did not have an annual performance evaluation completed until 8/4/25.Example 2CNA W's hire date was 7/16/96. CNA W's previous annual performance evaluation was completed on 7/10/24. CNA W did not have an annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse were reported to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse/neglect. A staff member was aware of a potential allegation of abuse, and it was not immediately reported to the administrator or designee.This is evidenced by:The Facility Policy, titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, indicates, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.VII. Reporting/Response. A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 9 residents (R) sampled for review of Abuse (R1 and R2) were free from involuntary seclusion. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure, provided by the Administrator, noted Involuntary Seclusion refers to the separation of a resident from other residents or from his/her room or confinement to his/her room against the resident's will or the will of the resident's legal representative. Emergency or short term monitored separation from other residents will not be considered involuntary seclusion and may be permitted if used for a limited time as a therapeutic intervention to reduce agitation until professional staff can develop a plan of care to meet the resident's needs as long as the least restrictive approach is used for the minimum amount of time. Example 1 Review of the Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for three of four (Residents (R) R2, R11, and R8) residents reviewed for physical abuse. The facility failed to put consistent interventions into place to prevent one resident (R3) from repeated physical violence towards other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property . Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition . Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to . physical abuse of a resident observed . The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse for one of four residents (R11) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 11 was reported to the state survey agency (SSA) within the required time frame. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse . Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all required agencies . within specified timeframes . Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. Review of R3's electronic medical record (EMR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an incident of potential resident-to-resident abuse for one of four residents (R11) reviewed for abuse out of eleven sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revealed, . An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur .Identifying staff responsible for the investigation .Investigation different types of alleged violations .Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations .Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extend, and cause .Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation .The facility will make efforts to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to contact the pharmacy to ensure medications were available for administration for two of three residents (Resident (R) 6 and R9) reviewed for medication administration out of a sample of eleven residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Pharmacy Policy and Procedure Omnicell Manual, revealed Nursing Home staff and HealthDirect Pharmacy will use the Omnicell System as an inventory, charging, and information system for the control and distribution of medications for Continuous Dosing, Emergency, and First-Dose use . All licensed staff nurses will have access privileges to controlled medications pursuant to a valid prescription order . All licensed staff nurses will have access privileges to non-controlled medications . Charge Nurses, Director of Nursing, and some Pharmacy personnel may have some of the following privileges . Refilling of non-controlled and controlled medications . Head nurses are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 64 Residents who reside in the facility. Kitchen floor was unclean with visible dirt and food debris on the floor. Dish machine rinse temperature did not reach the 180-degree rinse requirement. Evidenced by: Facility Policy titled 'Sanitization,' states in part: .The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner . 1. All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects. 4. Sanitizing of environmental surfaces must be performed with one of the following solutions: a. 50-11 ppm chlorine solution; 150-200ppm quaternary ammonium compound (QAC); or c. 12.5ppm iodine solution.15. Kitchen and dining room surfaces not in contact with food shall be cleaned on a regular schedule and frequently enough to prevent accumulation of grime. 16. the food services manager will be responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0560 — isolatedProtect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not afford the resident or resident's representative the right to refuse to transfer to another room in the facility for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed for room transfers. R1, R2, and R3 received room change notices and the facility did not afford the residents' representatives the opportunity to refuse the room change. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Room Change/Roommate Assignment revised 3/2021 states in part; changes in room or roommate assignment are made when the facility deems it necessary or when the resident requests the change. 1. Resident room or roommate assignment may change if the facility deems it necessary. Resident preferences are taken into account when such changes are considered. 2. Room changes initiated by the facility are limited to moves with the same building in which the resident currently resident resides unless the resident voluntarily agrees to move to another building within the same facility. Prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including, but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living for 1 (R2) of 3 resident rooms observed. R2's bathroom toilet was soiled with stool and family reported it had been soiled for several days. This is evidenced by: On 10/8/24 at 6:45 PM, Surveyor observed R2's room and bathroom. R2's toilet was soiled with stool. On 10/9/24 8:20 AM, Surveyor observed R2's room and bathroom. R2's toilet was soiled with stool. On 10/9/25 at 8:15 AM, Surveyor met R2's Guardian FM K (Family Member) and Spouse. R2's guardian asked Surveyor if she had observed R2's bathroom. Surveyor observed R2's bathroom and noted the bathroom remained dirty with stool observed around and in the stool. FM K stated this has been like this for several days; the facility does not clean R2's bathroom or room. FM K stated she has had to clean R2's room because the facility does not. On 10/9/24 at 8:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed Hskp BB (Housekeeping) regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a facility-initiated discharge, failed to ensure the written notice contained all pertinent information for a discharge notice including the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; a statement of the resident's appeal rights, and the name and address of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 2 facility-initiated discharges reviewed involving 2 Resident (R1 and R2). R1 and R2 received involuntary discharge notices; however, the notices did not contain all necessary information. This is evidenced by: The facility's Transfer and/or Discharge Policy revised 3/2021 states in part: (2) residents are permitted to stay in the facility, and not be transferred or discharged unless: a. The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility . (3) except as specified below, the resident and his or her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support resident choice of activities, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident for 3 of 3 Residents (R1, R2, R3) residing on the Way Unit. Activity staff and staff working on the Way Unit were not providing or offering activities for R1, R2, and R3. There is no documentation of R1, R2, and R3 participating or being offered activities since they were moved to the Way Unit. This is evidenced by: Facility Policy entitled 'Individual Activities and Room Visit program,' states in part: .Individual activities will be provided for those residents whose situation or condition prevents participation in other types of activities and for those residents who do not wish to attend group activities. Residents who are able to maintain an independent program will have supplies available to them.1. individual activities are provided for individuals who have conditions or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that there is sufficient, qualified nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 3 Residents (R1, R2, & R3). RA (Resident Assistants), who are not Certified Nursing Assistants, were working on the Way Unit alone with R1, R2 and R3 who require increased supervision. This is evidenced by: Facility Employee list shows RA H, RA CC, RA X, and RA AA as being RA's and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Facility staffing schedule indicates the following: On 10/1/24, RA H worked 6:30 AM to 3:00 PM, on the Way Unit and RA CC worked the Way Unit from 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM with another RA training. On 10/2/24, RA CC worked 1:30 PM to 10:00 PM on the Way Unit. No indication on the schedule of a CNA being assigned to the Way Unit during this time. On 10/5/24, RA H worked from 6:30 AM to 3:00 PM, no indication on the schedule who was assigned to the Way Unit or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY UNCORRECTED AT VERIFICATION VISIT. See SOD for Event ID #MK7V11 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents for 4 of 4 residents (R8, R10, R4, and R7) reviewed for falls/accidents and 4 of 4 residents (R1, R6, R2, and R5) reviewed for resident to resident/supervision. R8 required a two-person transfer with a full body lift, a staff member completed the transfer independently and R8 fell out of the lift. Staff did not follow R10's care plan when they transferred R10 to the restroom. Staff did not have foot pedals on R10's chair and Surveyor observed staff pushing R10 down the hall with his left leg dragging under the wheelchair seat. R7 was observed self transferring without gripper socks. R4 was transferred with the incorrect sling. R1 has the potential to be physically aggressive related to dementia and has a recent history of having resident to resident interactions at the facility. R1's care plan has an intervention that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive the care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (R8 and R4). R8 did not have neurological checks completed after a fall per facility protocol. R4 was admitted with orders to weigh daily and update the Physician with a weight increase or decrease by 3 lbs. (pounds) in a day or 5 lbs. in a week. R4's weights were not completed daily, and the physician was not always informed when weights fell outside the given parameters. This is evidenced by: The facility has an Unwitnessed Fall Checklist, undated, which state in part; if resident is unable to tell you if they hit their head, assume they did and do neuro (Neurological) checks with vital signs. Neuro checks are to be completed in PCC (Point Click Care/Electronic Health Record) under the assessment tab. Vital signs/Neuro Checks at time of fall and fifteen minutes after fall,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure hand hygiene and infection control practices were performed to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 4 residents (R11) observed for hand hygiene and infection control opportunities. Staff were observed not completing hand hygiene per standards of practice, placing dirty washcloths in the wash basin, placing dirty washcloths on the bedside table, not disinfecting the bedside table or mechanical lift. This is evidence by: The facility policy titled Handwashing/Hygiene dated revised 8/2019 states in part; the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 3. Hand hygiene products and supplies shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene polices. 6.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect all 69 residents. Staff returned to work to soon after signs and symptoms of GI (gastrointestinal illness). Surveyors observed R24 reach in the kitchenette's ice machine with her bare hands. The facility policy entitled Communicable/Contagious Diseases, Employee, with a revision date of 1/24, states in part: . Policy Statement: Personnel with active communicable infections may not be in contact with residents, resident-care items and equipment, or resident environments (e.g., common areas or resident rooms) until they are no longer clinically infectious or contagious. Work restrictions and return to work criteria for specific illnesses are determined by the infection preventionist based on the risk of transmission. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 2. Personnel may not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure prompt resolution of all grievances for 3 of 14 residents reviewed (R2, R40, and R59) for grievances out of a total sample of 17 residents and 5 of 5 supplemental residents reviewed for grievances (R31, R6, R10, R39 and R50). R31, R39, R10, R40 voiced concerns at the Resident Council Meeting regarding the facility not following up on concerns/grievances. R2, R6, R50, and R59 voiced concerns during individual interviews regarding the facility not following up on voiced concerns/grievances. Staff reported they were aware of concerns voiced by R2, R50, R59, R40, R10, R39, R6, and R31 and did not report to the Grievance Official and did not follow the facility's grievance process. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Grievance/Complaint Filing, revised 4/2017, includes, in part: Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all medications were stored and labeled in accordance with standard of practice for 3 of 3 (R25, R8, and R422) supplemental resident's, 2 of 4 medication storage rooms, and 3 of 5 medication carts reviewed. Surveyor observed expired eye drop administration to R25 during medication pass. Surveyor observed expired facility stock supply of acetaminophen 325 mg (milligram) tablets of the 300 wing medication cart during the medication storage task on [DATE]. This medication was previously administered to R8 and R422 on [DATE] morning doses. Surveyor observed an opened multidose vial of Tubersol in the medication room refrigerator located on the 300 wing with an unreadable partial date of unknown identification if the partial date is for the date of opening the vial or the expiration date. Evidenced by: The facility policy Administering Medications, revision date [DATE], states in part, . 12. The expiration/beyond use date on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents choices were honored in meal substitutions and an environment that promotes an enhanced quality of life which affected 1 of 1 resident (R59) out of a total sample of 17 residents. R59 voiced concerns her bed was not always made and her choice to have her bed made was not always honored. R59 also expressed concerns her meal choices were not honored. As evidenced by: Example 1 R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including paresthesia of skin, which is a tingling or prickly sensation in the arms, hands, legs, or feet. R59's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 6/4/24, indicates R59 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 9 out of 15 indicating R59 is moderately cognitively impaired. R59's MDS indicates the need for some help with self-care and mobility, as well as partial/moderate assistance with all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R59's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident's (R30) out of a total sample of 17 residents observed for self- administration of medications. R30 was observed to have medications on the floor and an empty medication cup on her bedside table. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Administering Medications dated April 2019, states in part, .27. Residents may self- administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely . The facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated February 2021, states in part, .1. As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self- administration of medications is safe and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, the facility did not ensure adequate indications for use prior to the administration of a high-risk medication for 1 resident of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 17 residents (R40). R40 receives Lemborexant (sedative/hypnotic) for insomnia. The facility failed to complete a sleep assessment for R40 prior to prescribing and administering a hypnotic medication. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, states: Policy Statement: Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition. Policy interpretation and implementation: A psychotropic medication is any medication[sic] that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior. Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: a. anti-psychotics; b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that before offering the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations, each resident or the resident's representative receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization, and the resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: that the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations; and that the resident either received the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations or did not receive the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations due to medical contraindications or refusal. This affected 1 of 5 residents (R40) reviewed for immunizations. R40 was not offered pneumococcal vaccines. Facility does not have a declination or consent for the pneumococcal vaccine. The facility policy entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised 5/22/24, states, in part: . Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility's assessment, last reviewed/updated on 8/18/23, does not address the competencies to care for residents with behaviors or what the facility is doing to work with residents with behavioral needs. The facility assessment does not address the number of residents with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), the resources required for those residents, or the number of staff necessary to care for these residents. The deficient practice has the potential to affect 19 of the 20 residents with dementia on the View Unit. Findings include: NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) provided Surveyor a copy of a document titled, Facility Wide Resource Assessment, which states in part . Purpose: The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment will be used to make decision about the direct care staff needs, as well as the capabilities to provide services to the residents at [Facility Name] Nursing Home. Using a competency-based approach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility changed R1's living area for staff convenience and did not ensure that R1's representative was notified in writing of the room change for 1 of 1 residents (R1) out of a total sample of 7 residents. R1 was moved back and forth on the View unit and the Dementia Stabilization Unit (DSU) for staff convenience and without giving written notice of the change to R1's representative. This is evidenced by: Facility Policy entitled Room Change/Roommate Assignment, revised March 2021, states, in part: . Policy Statement: Changes in room or roommate assignment are made when the facility deems it necessary or when the resident requests the change. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Room changes initiated by the facility are limited to moves within the same building in which the resident currently residents, unless the resident voluntarily agrees to move to another building within the same facility (composite distinct part). 4. Prior to changing room or roommate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not permit 1of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for transfer and discharge to stay in the facility and did not transfer a resident from the facility unless the transfer was necessary and the residents needs could not be met by the facility. R1 was transferred to and from the skilled nursing facility to the community based residential facility within the facility campus without giving R1's family proper notice and without proper documentation justifying the transfer. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for, states in part . Policy Statement: Resident will be prepared in advance for discharge. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. When a resident is scheduled for transfer or discharge, the business office will notify nursing services of the transfer or discharge so that appropriate procedures can be implemented. 2. A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her transfer or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification to the resident, resident representative and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for transfer/discharge out of a total sample of 7. The facility failed to notify R1's representative and the Ombudsman in writing of the reason for transfer to the Dementia Stabilization Unit (DSU). This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for, states in part . Policy Statement: Resident will be prepared in advance for discharge. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. When a resident is scheduled for transfer or discharge, the business office will notify nursing services of the transfer or discharge so that appropriate procedures can be implemented. 2. A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her transfer or discharge. This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his or her family, at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 1 (R1) of 1 resident reviewed for discharge. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for, states in part . Policy Statement: Resident will be prepared in advance for discharge. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. When a resident is scheduled for transfer or discharge, the business office will notify nursing services of the transfer or discharge so that appropriate procedures can be implemented. 2. A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her transfer or discharge. This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his or her family, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the resident's discharge or transfer from the facility. 3. Nursing services is responsible for: a. obtaining orders for discharge or transfer, as well as recommended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not provide evidence that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had 12 hours of in-service training per year for 1 of 5 CNA's reviewed for in-service training. The survey team randomly selected five (5) facility CNAs who have been employed at the facility for longer than one (1) year. CNA W did not have 12 hours of in-service training. Findings include: Surveyor provided NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) with a list of five CNA names the Surveyor had randomly selected and requested their in-service records. PAA Y (Payroll/Accounting Assistant) stated that Facility Educator X is out today and they do not have access to her files. PAA Y stated, she has only access to Relias training but no other training files. Surveyor reviewed the in-service records and noted the following: Surveyor reviewed CNA W's in-service records from 1/20/22 - 1/20/23. During this time, CNA W completed zero (0) hours of in-service for the year 1/20/22 - 1/20/23. The facility did not provide any documentation for training hours 1/20/23 - 1/20/24. CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 supplemental resident's (R26) observed during medication pass. R26 was observed to have her medications left at bedside. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Medication Administration Policy dated 9/6/19, states in part, .10. Self- Administration of Medications .a. For a resident to administer their own medications, the resident needs to have completed and passed a nursing assessment that will aid in determining if this resident is capable of self- administering their own medications including leaving medications to be taken at their own determined time, completing their own nebulizer treatments, and applying an ointment or cream where and when ordered. b. A medical provider will need to order meds to be at bedside or to administer own medications. The resident must provide ability to self- administer their own medications prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident is free from physical restraints that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for restraints (R35 and R29). R35 had a pommel cushion without an assessment for its use. The facility did not consider this device a restraint. R29 had a wheelchair seatbelt she could not be easily removed by the resident. The facility did not consider this device a restraint. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Use of Restraints last revised April 2017, states in part: Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. When the use of restraints is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R1) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for pressure injuries received the necessary care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from developing. R1 was at risk for pressure injury (PI) development. R1 developed a deep tissue injury (DTI) to the left heel. Facility staff did not ensure PI interventions were in place and did not implement an appropriate offloading device for the left (L) heel. Treatment orders were not completed as ordered. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 4, Alzheimer's, and osteoporosis. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/14/23 indicates a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section G of the MDS indicates R1 requires extensive assistance of 1 staff for bed mobility and transfers. Section M…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided consistent with standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (R42) out of a total sample of 21. R42 had an order for scheduled and PRN (as needed) pain medication. R42 has chronic pain and feels pain is not controlled. Facility had not been assessing pain with scheduled pain medication to track effectiveness of medications. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Administering Pain Medications, with a revision date of March 2020, states, in part: . Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for assessing the resident's level of pain prior to administering analgesic pain medication . General Guidelines: 1. The pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain, based on professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices related to pain management. 2. Pain management is defined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 4 residents (R64) of a total of 21 residents reviewed had a drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs. R64 did not meet criteria for antibiotic therapy. As evidenced by The facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship & MDROs (Multi Drug Resistant Antibiotics), dated 2020, indicates in part, the following: Antibiotic stewardship refers to systemic efforts to optimize the use of antibiotics - not just reduce the total volume used - to maximize their benefits to patients, while minimizing both the rise of antibiotic resistance as well as adverse effects to patients from unnecessary antibiotic therapy. The CDC (Centers for Disease Control) indicates that antibiotics are among the most frequently prescribed medications in nursing homes with up to 70% of residents receiving at least one antibiotic when followed for over one ear. The CDC defines Antibiotic Stewardship as a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: that the resident or resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of pneumococcal immunization; and that the resident either received the influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindications or refusal, this affected 3 of 5 residents (R10, R44, R59) reviewed for immunizations. R10 had no documentation of pneumococcal immunizations in their medical record. R44 had no documentation of pneumococcal immunizations in their medical record. R59 had no documentation of pneumococcal immunizations in their medical record. The facility has not updated their pneumococcal policy to reflect the Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) recommendations to include PCV15: 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Vaxneuvance) and PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar20). The facility has not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$225,807 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $183,827 — penalty dated 2025-08-04
- $41,980 — penalty dated 2024-03-12
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-07 for 93 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON, MARIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/07/2022 |
| PAX, THERESA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 07/01/2019 |
| COUNTY OF GREEN | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/1985 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525643. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.