Lindengrove New Berlin
13755 W Fieldpointe Dr, New Berlin, WI 53151 · Non profit - Church related · 110 certified beds · (262) 796-3660 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $100,006 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-08)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.4% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.2% | 2.1% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.5% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 5.7% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.1% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.5% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.5% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.2% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 71.1% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.9% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.0% | 15.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.73 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 2.29 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 165 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.8%CMS range 40.9–56.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 9.7–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.4–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 82.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R1 & R3) of 3 residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.*R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of falls. R1 fell on 8/11/25 while attempting to self transfer. The facility did not thoroughly investigate this fall and was aware of R1's multiple attempts to self transfer but did not address R1's self transferring behaviors. On 8/19/25 R1 fell, was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a pelvic fracture. R1 returned to the facility on 8/28/25. On 8/31/25 R1 fell. The facility did not thoroughly investigate this fall.*R3's falls on 6/26/25, 7/7/25, 7/13/25, 7/29/25, 8/2/25, 8/20/25, & 8/26/25 were not thoroughly investigated. On 9/4/25 R3 received the incorrect diet for lunch., putting R3 at risk for choking. On 9/8/25 during morning cares, R3 bed was not lowered according to R3's falls plan of care when CNA-L went into the bathroom and/or left R3's room.Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 (R1 and R2) residents reviewed for accidents. R1 was care planned to transfer with a sit to stand mechanical lift and assist of 2 staff. CNA's transferred the resident with 2-person pivot. R1 sustained a leg fracture.R2 was care planned to transfer with a sit to stand mechanical lift and assist of 2 staff. The CNA transferred the resident alone. R2 sustained a fall from the sit to stand resulting in a head laceration requiring staples.Findings include:R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and entered onto Hospice [DATE]. Diagnoses included Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Dementia, anxiety, Osteoporosis and Pulmonary Hypertension. R1 passed away at the facility on [DATE].R1's Care Plan documented: The resident has an ADL (Activity of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents remain free of accident hazards and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (R12) reviewed for accidents. R12 sustained a significant injury to her leg which required surgical intervention. The facility did not complete a thorough investigation as to how the injury occurred. Findings include: R12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Chronic Kidney Disease, Anemia, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease), Hypothyroidism, Vascular Dementia with anxiety, Osteoarthritis and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of bladder. R12's BIMS (Brief Interview For Mental Status) Evaluation dated [DATE] documents a score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R12's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated [DATE] documents: Self-Care Toileting hygiene: The ability to maintain perineal hygiene, adjust clothes before and after voiding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-08-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free of a significant medication error for 1 (R86) of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors. R86 did not receive omeprazole as ordered for four weeks resulting in a hospitalization for a gastrointestinal bleed. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Transcribing Physician's Orders dated 3/2021 states: I. Basic Entry of Physician Orders: A. At the implementation stage, three conditions must be met before a nurse may legally follow through on any medication or treatment order: 1. The medication or treatment order must be valid. 2. The physician and nurse obtaining the order must be licensed. 3. The nurse must know the purpose, actions, effects, major side effects and appropriate dose for all medication orders. B. A valid order is one that leaves no room for doubt as to the directive, treatment or medication prescribed. Medications ordered must have a dose and route, and dosing intervals. All orders must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act, the facility did not report 1 of 2 allegations reviewed for neglect/mistreatment to the State Survey Agency during the required timeframe.R2's daughter sent an email to the Nursing Home Administrator regarding a concern of mistreatment and neglect towards R1. This was delayed in being reported to the state agency.Findings include:The Facility Policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, last reviewed 11/8/23, documents (in part): G. Reporting and ResponseAbuse Policy Requirements:It is the policy of this facility that abuse allegations are reported per Federal and State Law. The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. * R2 developed a rash and R2's physician was not notified in order for R2 to obtain treatment. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled, Standard Skin Protocol, with no date, documents, in part: Goal: Breaks in skin integrity will be minimized with current plan of care.RN: Complete skin assessment on admission, weekly with bath and PRN (as needed).Consult wound certified Nurse PRN.Individual/POA (power of attorney) education regarding minimizing skin breakdown.Notify MD (medical doctor) of changes in skin integrity as nurse observations deem appropriate.R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting left dominant side (a serious neurological condition characterized by paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse or neglect affecting 1 (R3) of 3 Facility Reported Incidents reviewed. R3 was found to have a large bruise to the back of the base of the neck. Staff members that cared for R3 were not interviewed to determine the cause of the bruise. Administration interviewed other residents to determine if they had safety concerns; no residents from R3's unit or floor were interviewed. The report that was filed with the State Agency documented conflicting dates of when the injury of unknown origin was discovered. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive 'Abuse', Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Program dated 11/8/2023 documents: E. INVESTIGATION: ABUSE POLICY REQUIREMENTS: It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated through the organization's QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and policy review the facility did not utilize a sanitary process for the dishwashing machine. This had the potential to effect all 87 residents in the facility. - The dietary staff was observed handling dirty items and placing them into the dishwashing machine. Then handling the clean items from the dishwashing machine with performing hand hygiene and using the same contaminated hands. Findings include: The facility's policy titled: Manual Dishwashing, undated, was reviewed. The policy documents: . All flatware, serving dishes, and cookware will be washed, rinsed, and sanitized after each use. Dish machines will be checked prior to meals to ensure proper functioning and appropriate temperatures for cleaning and sanitization. The procedures document under #9 to allow the dishes to air dry; #10 remove the dishes, inspect for cleanliness and dryness, and put them away if clean, Be sure your hands are clean. On 1/15/25, at 1:41 PM, Surveyor observed the dishwashing machine in the main kitchen. The facility has a single dish rack machine. Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not implement an effective infection prevention and control program. This had the potential to affect all 87 residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. - The facility did not have documentation they investigated infection outbreaks in the facility. - The facility did not have a system to track all facility staff illnesses. - The facility did not implement enhanced barrier precautions for R1 and R50 identified as having wounds. Findings include: The facility's policy titled: Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 12/5/24, was reviewed. The policy documents: To prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. The Procedure includes: Perform surveillance and investigation to prevent, to the extent possible, the onset and spread of infection. The facility's Outbreak and Isolation Procedures dated 12/5/24 were reviewed. The Procedures include: Initiate timeline documentation of outbreak management. The IP (Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that drugs and biological's used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the expiration date when applicable for 3 of 4 medication carts and 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed. Insulin vials and pens were not dated when opened. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled: Vials and Ampules of Injectable Medications dated May 2018, documents (in part) . Vials and ampules of injectable medications are used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations or the provider pharmacy's directions for storage, use, and disposal. A. Vials and ampules dispensed by the pharmacy are maintained in the box or container, with the pharmacy label, in which they are dispensed. B. Expiration dates: Opening a vial triggers a shortened expiration date that is unique for that product. The date opened and this shortened expiration date are both important to be recorded on multidose vials…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure it was safe and clinically appropriate for residents to self administer medications for 3 of 3 (R63, R75, and R56) residents observed for self administration of medications. R63 was observed to have medications at bedside. There was no assessment, physicians order or care plan for self administration of medications. R75 was observed to have medications at bedside. There was no assessment, physicians order or care plan for self administration of medications. R56 was observed to have medications at bedside. There was no assessment, physicians order or care plan for self administration of medications Findings include: The facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated May 2018, documents (in part) . In order to maintain the residents' high level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R62, R283, R67) of 7 residents reviewed that required hospitalizations were given written reason for transfer to the hospital and the facility did not send this notification to the ombudsman. R62 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a change in condition. R62 or their representative did not receive written notification of the reason for the transfer to the hospital and appeal rights and the State Ombudsman was not sent a copy of this notice. R283 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a change in condition. R283 or their representative did not receive written notification of the reason for the transfer to the hospital and appeal rights and the State Ombudsman was not sent a copy of this notice. R67 was transferred to the hospital on 6/13/24 for a change in condition. R67 or their representative did not receive written notification of the reason for the transfer to the hospital and appeal rights and the State Ombudsman was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R62, R283, R67) of 7 residents received a written notice of the bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. R62 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not receive written notice of the bed hold policy. R283 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not receive written notice of the bed hold policy. R67 was transferred to the hospital on 6/13/24 and did not receive written notice of the bed hold policy. Findings include: 1. The medical record indicates R62 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] due to a change in condition. Surveyor requested a copy of R62's written notice of the bed hold policy. On 1/14/25, at 3:21 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)- A and Director of Nursing (DON)- B who indicate floor nursing is responsible for providing the written notice of bed hold policy if a resident is sent out to the hospital. DON- B states the facility Social Worker (SW) will provide the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that residents who enter the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently receives one is assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary for 1 of 2 (R12) residents reviewed for catheters. R12 admitted to the facility without a catheter. R12 was hospitalized and returned to the facility with a Foley catheter. R12 did not have a diagnosis or clinical condition indicating the necessity of the catheter. Findings include: The facility policy titled: Standard Indwelling Catheter Protocol, undated, documents (in part) . Problem: Individual has Indwelling Catheter. RN (Registered Nurse)/LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse): Obtain order for indwelling catheter. Document type, size, balloon inflation size and indication for use (Neurogenic Bladder, Obstructive Uropathy, for promotion of healing pressure injuries related to incontinence and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 18 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 2 Residents reviewed received reasonable accommodation of needs, potentially affecting 24 of 87 residents. * Slings were not available to transfer R1 out of bed via a Hoyer mechanical lift. Residents using the same size sling that required [NAME] mechanial life transfers were also affected by slings not being availabe. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure, with Subject Safe Individual Handling Program last reviewed 6/13/2023 documents (in part): Procedure: D. Maintenance 1. Mechanical lifts, slings, gait belts, and slide sheets are to be routinely inspected, used and maintained according to manufacturer's guidelines. 2. Any soft goods (slings, gait belts, and slide sheets) that have identified tears or frays will be pulled from service and replaced with new . The Arjo Huntleigh Maxi Move user manual with date of December 2011 documents (in part): Product Description/Functions Slings . Standard Range: Yellow -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R1) of 2 residents reviewed for surgical incision wounds. * R1 was admitted with surgical incision wounds, there were no comprehensive assessments or orders in place for care of the surgical incisions and R1's skin integrity comprehensive care plan did not indicate R1 had surgical wounds. Findings include: The facility policy entitled STANDARD SKIN PROTOCOL with no initiation date documents: PROBLEM: Potential/ Alteration in skin integrity, GOAL: Breaks in skin integrity will be minimized with current plan of care. RN (registered nurse): - Complete skin assessment on admission, weekly with bath and PRN (as needed). - Pressure reducing interventions (i.e. Therapeutic mattress/cushion, heel protectors, positioning devices, repositioning, etc.). - Weekly wound measurements. 1.) R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices were in place to prevent accidents for 1 (R2) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. R2 fell on 7/2/2024 at approximately 7:30 AM and a root cause analysis was not completed to implement an appropriate intervention to prevent future falls. R2 fell on 7/2/2024 at approximately 5:30 PM sustaining lacerations to the face requiring R2 to go to the hospital to be evaluated and treated. A fall mat was not in place at the time of the fall, per R2's care plan to reduce the possibility of injury at the time of the second fall on 7/2/2024. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Falls dated 6/13/2023 documents: I. Policy: Prevention measures are put in place to reduce the occurrence of falls and risk of injury from falls. II. Procedure: . 2. Procedure of Fall Event and Implementation of Intervention: a. Licensed nurse completes electronic documentation of the Fall Incident Report.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 2 residents reviewed received appropriate treatment and services related to catheter care. * R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a foley catheter and did not have orders in place until 11/4/2024 for catheter care and monitoring. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Bowel and Bladder- Catheter Care with a reviewed date of 6/24/2022 documents: Policy: Nursing staff will assess catheter use to promote proper care. Procedure: A. Upon admission . 2. Obtain physicians order including appropriate diagnoses/ medical justification. B. Care Plan 1. Staff will care plan and implement interventions/ approaches for catheter use. C. Monitoring 1. Ongoing catheter use will be monitored for appropriate use and effectiveness. Additional interventions will be put in place as appropriate. 1.) R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that includes fracture of superior rim of left pubis, fracture of sacrum, nondisplaced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure food was stored or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety potentially affecting 87 of 88 residents in the facility. Food stored in the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator, the main kitchen walk-in freezer, and the three unit refrigerators were not labeled, dated, sealed, or had expired with mold present. Findings: The facility policy and procedure entitled Storage undated states: 8.c. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves. d. Date marking to indicate the date or day by which a ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food should be consumed, sold, or discarded will be visible on all high risk food e. Foods will be stored and handled to maintain the integrity of the packaging until ready for use. The facility policy and procedure entitled Gloves undated states: Procedure: . 2. Staff appropriately use utensils such as gloves, tongs, deli paper and spatulas to prevent food borne illness. 3. Gloved hands are considered a food contact surface that can get contaminated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R41) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for a facility initiated discharge received a written transfer/discharge notice that included the date of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights and contact information of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. R41 was transferred to the hospital on 1/29/23. R41 and their representative was not given a transfer notice. Findings include: On 11/7/23 a policy and procedure for transfer notices was requested and none provided by the facility. R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/06/23, the Surveyor reviewed R41's medical record and it indicated R41 was transferred to the hospital on 1/29/23. The resident's medical record did not include documentation that a transfer notice had been given to the resident and their representative for the hospitalization. On 11/07/23 at 8:13 AM, the Surveyor interviewed Administrator-A regarding resident transfer notices. Administrator-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R86 and R41) of 2 residents received a written bed hold notice when they were transferred to the hospital. * R86 was transferred to the hospital on 9/21/23. R86 and their responsible party and did not receive a written bed hold notice. * R41 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not receive written bed hold notice. Findings include: 1. R86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of left tibia fracture, muscle wasting, muscle atrophy and history of falling. The medical record indicates R86 was sent to a surgical orthopedic follow up appointment on 9/21/23. R86 was then transferred directly from the orthopedic appointment to the hospital where R86 was admitted on [DATE] to 9/25/23 due to a change in condition. On 11/6/23 at 1:04 PM, Surveyor asked the Director of Life Coach Services-H for a copy of the written bed hold notice provided to R86 or their responsible party related to R86's transfer from the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure residents that were dependent on staff for personal hygiene were provided the necessary care. This was observed with 2(R22 and R26) of 4 residents dependent on staff for personal hygiene. - R22 is unable to trim their nails and lotion their feet. R22 was observed with untrimmed nails and extremely dry flaky feet. - R26 is unable to trim their nails. R26 was observed with long nails. Findings include: On 11/06/23 at 7:51 AM Surveyor spoke with (Nursing Home Administrator) NHA-A regarding facility policy and procedures for personal hygiene. NHA-A indicated there is no actual policy and procedure for nail care. There is no procedures related to trimming resident nails and applying body lotion. 1. On 11/01/23 at 9:36 AM Surveyor observed R22 in bed. R22 had a stroke and has right sided weakness. R22's feet were exposed, and were observed very dry with long toenails. R22 indicated they have not trimmed their nails and applied any body lotion. On 11/02/23 at 9:35 AM Surveyor observed R22 in bed. R22 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent falls for 1 (R36) of 2 residents reviewed for falls. R36 had a witnessed fall on 3/18/2023 in the hallway while being pushed in the wheelchair and no interventions were implemented with a root cause analysis of the fall. R36 had a witnessed fall on 9/3/2023 where staff were not following R1's care plan to toilet R36 before and after meals. The care plan was not revised for 15 days. Findings: The facility policy and procedure entitled Falls dated 6/13/2023 states: 2. Procedure of Fall Event and Implementation of Intervention: a. Licensed nurse completes electronic documentation of the Fall Incident Report. b. The care plan will be updated with identified intervention. c. Registered Nurse reviews and completes the fall assessment and interventions. d. Fall follow-up assessments completed as indicated. 3. Administrative Review a. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents who received psychotropic medications had documentation for use, had behavioral interventions, or monitoring of behaviors with the use of the psychotropic medication for 1 (R36) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R36 was prescribed sertraline after admission to the facility with no indications for use, no targeted behavior monitoring, and an increase in dosage without documentation of increased behaviors. Findings: The facility policy and procedure entitled Medication Monitoring and Management dated May 2018 states: Anxiolytics/Antidepressants: During the first year in which a resident is admitted on a psychopharmacological medication (other than an antipsychotic or a sedative hypnotic), or after the facility has initiated such medication, the facility should attempt to taper the medication during at least two separate quarters (with at least one month between the attempts), unless clinically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served under sanitary conditions with the potential to effect 47 residents who eat food served out of the second-floor pantry (satellite kitchen area). *On 8/8/2022 at 12:08 PM, Surveyor observed Dietary Aide-O not clean the thermometer probe between different foods as Dietary Aide-O took the temperature of several food items. *Thermometer in the second-floor pantry was not cleaned or sanitized per facility policy or sanitizing chemical instructions. Thermometer was not completely air dried after being sanitized, before using to take a food temperature. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Unidine: Safety & Sanitation-Cleaning and Sanitizing Food Thermometers, dated 3/7/17, states: Taking and measuring food temperatures is an important part of preparing and serving food. Cleaning and sanitizing thermometers between uses is just as important. A thermometer that has not been properly cleaned and sanitized can become a food safety hazard rather than a preventative tool. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect 25 Residents on Unit A. *Surveyor observed staff break infection control standards and not don proper Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) in R37's room where PPE use was identified as needed by Droplet Precautions standards due to R37's COVID-Suspected Status. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Infection Control Program policy and procedure last revised 6/21, and notes the following applicable: . D. Preventing Spread of Infection a. Isolation and Precautions-Follow CDC (Centers for Disease Control) recommendations. Surveyor reviewed the CDC recommendations found at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations and notes the following: . 2. Recommended infection prevention and control (IPC) practices when caring for a patient with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R24 and R88) of 2 allegations of abuse or neglect were reported to the Nursing Home Administrator immediately and to the State Survey Agency. *R24 verbally expressed allegations of abuse consisting of staff making fun of her weight and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-I's treatment towards her. R24 informed Registered Nurse (RN)-D and Social Worker (SW)-G of these allegations, however, they did not immediately report the allegations to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A, and the facility did not report the allegations to the State Survey Agency. *R88 verbally expressed an allegation Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-J did not provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance to her. Director of Social Services (DSS)-M was made aware of the allegation of neglect, however, did not immediately report it to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A, and the facility did not report the allegation to the State Survey Agency. Findings Include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure allegations of potential abuse, and neglect were thoroughly investigated for 2 (R24 and R88) of 2 Residents reviewed for allegations of abuse and/or neglect. *R24 had expressed allegations of abuse consisting of staff making fun of R24's weight and allegations of abuse related to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA-I). Registered Nurse (RN-D) and Social Worker (SW-G) were aware of these allegations, however, a thorough investigation was not completed. *R88 had expressed an allegation CNA-J did not provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance. Director of Social Services (DSS-M) was made aware of this potential neglect allegation. However, a thorough investigation including was not completed. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Reporting and Investigation Process, policy and procedures revised 12/2016, and notes the following applicable to reporting: Policy: All alleged violations of Misconduct will be reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries, promote healing and prevent infection for 3 (R26, R16, and R15) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R26 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Stage 2 pressure injury to the coccyx that was not comprehensively assessed or treated until 8/2/2022. *R16 developed an Unstageable pressure injury on 5/16/2022 that was not comprehensively assessed until 5/31/2022. *R15 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with pressure injuries that were inaccurately staged, and the locations of the pressure injuries were not indicated. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Wound Care Prevention, Management and Documentation dated 8/2018, states: Procedure: . 6. All residents have a weekly skin inspection done by the unit nurse with their bath. Skin check findings are documented in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R37) of 2 Residents reviewed with limited range of motion, received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. R37 is to receive restorative services 5 times (5x) per week and the facility is unable to provide documentation the services have been provided. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Restorative Nursing Program policy and procedure, revised 12/14, and notes the following: Policy: The facility believes that each Resident has the right to become involved in his/her own care and to have the services available to reach their highest practical physical and psychosocial level well-being. All Residents will be evaluated for participation in the restorative nursing program. Procedure: 1. A restorative program is initiated and assessed by the Nurse Manager/designee in the electronic health record (EMR). 2. The Nurse Manager/designee is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not have a comprehensive assessment or informed consent for repositioning/assist bars for 1 (R14) of 1 residents observed with repositioning/assist bars. *R14 did not have a physician order for their repositioning/assist bars and the facility did not obtain consent or assess the risk of entrapment prior to installation. The facility also did not have evidence that risks, and benefits were discussed with the resident and/or representative. Finding Include: The facility policy, entitled Safe Bed Environment, with a revision date of 11/2019, states: Policy .The use of bedrails/side rails is not the facilities usual practice. The facility promotes the use of alternative measures or options to bed rails/side rails based on individual, resident assessment by the interdisciplinary team. If the interdisciplinary team, through assessment identifies that assistive device would be beneficial for the resident to maintain independence in bed mobility an alternative to bed rails/side rails will be the first choice. Procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed when using an antipsychotic medication for 1 (R44) of 1 resident reviewed for antipsychotic medication use. R44 did not have an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment completed while a resident of the facility and prescribed antipsychotic medication. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Comprehensive Nursing Documentation dated 12/2013 states AIMS assessments are completed yearly, only if applicable - there are 2 pages to complete. R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbances, restlessness and agitation, visual hallucinations, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, and depression. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,t dated 3/25/2022, for the election of hospice was completed. The MDS indicated R44 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$100,006 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $55,200 — penalty dated 2025-09-08
- $44,806 — penalty dated 2025-01-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-21 for 12 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARQUARDT VILLAGE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/07/2023 |
| MARKS, JULIE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/05/2025 |
| DETTMAN, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| FISCHER, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| HEROUX, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| KOHLHOFF, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| KONKOL, DENNIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| MEIDENBAUER, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| VAN DER LINDEN, KATIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| WAGNER, LYNNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| MAUTHE, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2023 |
| ILLUMINUS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2023 |
| JONES, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525064. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.