No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

New Glarus Home

600 2nd Ave., New Glarus, WI 53574 · Non profit - Church related · 100 certified beds · (608) 527-2126 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)3 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$85,311 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $85,311 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-16)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1121 Bellwest Blvd · (608) 424-3384 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1101 Wisconsin 69 · (608) 527-2517 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
102 5th Ave · (608) 527-4878 · Call to confirm hours
Park
312 4th Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%16.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.3%2.1%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.9%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.6%5.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.4%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.0%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.1%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.1%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.5%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.4%23.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%15.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.111.661.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.782.291.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 173 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 41.4–56.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.5–11.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.7–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.03
RN hours/ resident / day
0.37
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.87
RN hoursweekends
50.8%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 95.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident. This affected 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse. R1 has a documented history of touching other male residents inappropriately. On 4/27/25, a resident woke to R1 in his room with R1 having his hands in the resident's brief, touching his penis. On 4/28/25, it was reported by a resident that R1's hand was in his crotch. This resident reported that R1 touched his genitals but did not hurt him. R1 was placed on 1:1 (one on one) supervision following these incidents. In the following months the facility decreased R1's supervision from 1:1 to 15-minute checks, to one-hour checks, to two-hour checks and finally discontinuing R1's supervision on 12/12/25. On 01/18/26, R1 was found by staff in R2's room inappropriately touching him in his private area. The facility placed R1 on 15-minute checks when in bed or his recliner and 1:1 supervision when out of his room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for pressure injuries received the necessary care and services to promote healing and/or prevent pressure injuries from developing. R2 was at risk for pressure injury (PI) development. R2 developed a Stage 3 PI to the right ischium. Facility staff did not ensure PI interventions were in place and did not implement appropriate offloading interventions until after the PI was discovered. The facility policy, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, updated 7/18/23, indicates, in part, as follows: The facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries, unless clinically unavoidable, and to provide treatment and services to health [sic] the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure ulcers/injuries. Definitions: Pressure Ulcer/Injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. Avoidable means that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status for 1 of 1 Residents (R11) reviewed for nutritional status. R11 did not have appropriate interventions put into place to prevent continued weight loss. R11 had a weight loss of 20.6 pounds/12.86% over 2 months and 10 days, indicating a severe weight loss. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Weight Policy, undated, states in part, Goal: To evaluate and meet the nutritional needs of our residents. Objective: Obtain weights as ordered or specified by this policy to monitor changes in weight, weight patterns, and implement appropriate interventions as needed. Procedure: . 3. Each resident will have weight measured at least monthly, unless on hospice. Weight may be obtained weekly, bi-weekly, or daily, depending on the specific needs of an individual resident . 5. If the current weight is +/- 4# (pounds) different than previous weight, resident must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents have an environment free of hazards and did not provide adequate supervision and assistive devices for 2 of 5 total sampled residents (R2 & R1). R2's care plan was not followed, resulting in a fall with left distal femur fracture on 7/10/24. R1 was an elopement risk and wears a WanderGuard. R1 was known to make attempts to follow others out of the building. On 7/18/24, R1 eloped from the facility and was found by Witness T approximately 0.3 miles down the road across the street from the church. R1's WanderGuard did not alarm when she exited the Memory Care Unit (MCU) and staff were not aware R1 exited the building. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, dated 7/15/23, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited: effects the censusBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 95 residents who reside in the facility. Surveyor observed unsealed food in the freezer. Surveyor observed expired milk in circulation. Surveyor observed kitchen staff take the temperatures of food without properly cleaning the food thermometer probe. Surveyor observed kitchen staff serving food without taking the temperature. Surveyor observed food serving utensils not being used in a sanitary manner. Surveyor observed uncovered drinks being transported down the hallway during lunch tray delivery. Surveyor observed staff going into the main kitchen without beard nets on. Surveyor observed the dishwashing process. A dining aide failed to ensure proper hand washing was completed when going from dirty items to clean items in the kitchen. Surveyor observed staff wet stacking dishes and using a towel on clean dishes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible, or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 5 residents (R6) reviewed for nutritional status. R6 was assessed to be at risk for dehydration. The facility failed to update R6's care plan and did not implement monitoring or documenting fluid intake. Evidenced by:The facility's policy titled Hydration date implemented 1/5/26 states in part .Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will utilize a systemic approach to optimize the resident's hydration states: a. Identifying each resident's hydration status and risk factors b. Evaluating/analyzing the assessment information c. Developing and consistently implementing pertinent approaches d. Monitoring the effectiveness of intervention and revising them as necessary.R6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 of 2 Residents (R31) observed for administration of eye drops.RN C (Registered Nurse) had a breach in infection control when RN C did not wear gloves for administration of eye drops.Evidenced by: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, dated 2/5/25, states, in part: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines.4. Standard Precautions: a. All staff shall assume that all residents are potentially infected or colonized with an organism that could be transmitted during the course of providing resident care services.c.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 of 3 sampled resident's (R1's) right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident.Staff witnessed R2 touch R1 on the breast. As a result of the incident, the facility placed interventions on R2's care plan to prevent further incidents from occurring. These interventions were observed not to be in place and staff were not aware of the care planned interventions. This is evidenced by:R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R1's diagnoses include in part, dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, hypertension, dorsalgia, and muscle weakness.R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2 has a BIMS of 3, indicating R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R2's diagnoses include in part, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, diabetes mellitus type 2, cerebral atherosclerosis, depression, muscle weakness, and history of TIA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for 2 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed. CNA L did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. CNA M did not have an annual performance evaluation completed. This is evidence by: Example 1 CNA L's hire date was 5/3/23. CNA L did not have an annual performance evaluation completed for 2024. Example 2 CNA M's hire date was 2/10/23. CNA M did not have an annual performance evaluation completed for 2024. On 3/31/25 at 1:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON (Director of Nursing) B. Surveyor asked DON B how often are CNA evaluations to be done. DON B indicates, yearly. Surveyor asked if DON B would expect all CNA's to have a yearly performance evaluation. DON B indicates, yes.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 resident (R12) reviewed for handwashing. The facility staff did not complete proper hand hygiene while performing wound care. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Clean Dressing Change, dated 5/4/25, states in part: It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. 9. Loosen the tape and remove the existing dressing. 10. Remove gloves, pulling inside out over the dressing. Discard in appropriate receptacle. 11. Wash hands and put on clean glvoes. 12. Cleanse the wound as ordered .14. Wash hands and put on clean gloves. 15. Apply topical ointments or creams and dress the wound as ordered . 16. Secure dressing. 17. Discard disposable items and gloves into appropriate trash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility does not have an effective infection control program to control the spread of infectious disease, in this case COVID-19; this has the potential to affect all 87 residents residing at the facility. The facility is experiencing an extensive COVID outbreak that started on 12/30/24 when three (3) residents and one (1) staff member tested COVID positive. The outbreak has affected 6 of 6 units. As of 1/15/25, 38 residents and 18 staff members (total of 56) tested COVID positive during this ongoing outbreak. The facility failed to do the following: Staff were observed exiting COVID positive room with PPE on and doffing PPE in the hallway. While removing PPE in the hallway, staff contaminated clean PPE with dirty PPE. The facility is not documenting COVID positive residents' signs and symptoms on the line list or elsewhere. The facility is not fit testing agency staff for N95s. On 12/30/24, the facility identified they were in a COVID outbreak when three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the residents right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing for 2 of 6 residents (R1 and R4). R1's medical record banner states R1's son, daughter, and daughter-in-law cannot visit. The facility posted a sign at the nurses' station indicating R1's son, daughter, and daughter-in-law are not allowed to visit. R4's medical record banner states R4 cannot receive visits from FM E (Family Member). The facility posted a sign at the nurses' station indicating R4 is not allowed visits from FM E. This is evidenced by: The facility Residents' Rights handout, undated, states, in part: .You retain the ability to exercise any rights that you do not delegate to a representative .You have the right to spend private time with visitors. The facility must permit your family, your representative(s), your physician, a representative of the state, and your Long-Term Care Ombudsman to visit you at any time . The facility provided an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were free from sexual abuse perpetrated by a resident for 1 of 6 sampled residents (R2). R3 was found in R2's room sitting on the edge of the bed with R2's Depends unfastened and fondling R2 between the butt cheeks. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy & Procedures, dated 2/25/23, states, in part: . Policy Statement: It is the policy of New Glarus (referred to as the facility herein) to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Definitions: . Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations . Instances of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law though established procedures for 1 of 6 abuse investigations (R3) reviewed. Facility became aware of an abuse allegation on 11/26/24 at 4:30 AM and was not reported to State Agency until 11/26/24 at 10:39 AM. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy & Procedures, dated 2/25/23, states, in part: . Policy Statement: It is the policy of New Glarus (referred to as the facility herein) is to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Definitions: . Abuse means the willful infliction of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an accusation of physical abuse for 1 of 6 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse. R3 was found in R2's room sitting on edge of bed with R2's depends unfastened, fondling R2 between the butt cheeks. Facility did not put anything in place to prevent this from happening again. Facility did not provide abuse education to all staff. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy & Procedures, dated 2/25/23, states, in part: . Policy Statement: It is the policy of New Glarus (referred to as the facility herein) is to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Definitions: . Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure snacks were offered at bedtime daily when there are more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast. This has the potential to affect 90 of 90 residents and 6 of 6 units. R40, R19, R16, R70, and R2 voiced concerns that residents were not consistently being offered a snack at bedtime. These residents reside on the following hallways: 200 hall, 600 hall, and 300 hall Staff on the following hallways reported to the Survey team that bedtime snacks were not being offered to all residents: 500 hall, 300 hall, 600 hall, 400 hall, 200 hall, and 100 hall. There were more than 14 hours between the evening meal and breakfast and the facility staff were not offering snacks to all residents. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Resident Food Service: Snacks, revised 1/24, includes: .All residents must be offered daily snack at bedtime unless otherwise specified in resident's plan of care. Nursing: Offer bedtime snacks to all residents. Facility's Posted Mealtimes and Locations are as follows: Breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 90 residents who reside in the facility. Surveyor observed multiple staff in food preparation areas, while food was being prepared, without donning hair restraints. Surveyor observed staff not allowing dishes to air dry completely before stacking them. Surveyor observed dented cans in circulation. Surveyor observed opened and undated food. Surveyor observed unclean stored equipment in facility's main kitchen. Evidenced by: Example 1 Facility policy, titled Uniform Dress Code, revised 1/24, includes: . Wear approved hair restraint when on duty regardless of length or presence of hair . On 12/2/24 at 10:11 AM, Surveyor observed DM L (Dietary Manager) in the facility's main kitchen, in the food preparation area without a hair restraint. Surveyor asked DM L about her hair restraint and DM L indicated she should have one on and she is sorry. On 12/5/24 at 8:20 AM, Surveyor observed CNA X (Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee consisting of at a minimum, the Director of Nursing Services, the Medical Director, or his/her designee, at least three other members of the facility's staff at least one of whom must be the administrator, owner, a board member, or other individual in a leadership role, and the Infection Preventionist, which met at least quarterly. This has the potential to affect all 90 residents residing within the facility. Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings did not consist of the required attendees/members for the months of February and June, 2024. This is evidenced by: The facility QAPI plan, titled (Facility Name) QAPI Plan, undated, states in part: .(Facility Name) will establish a quality management committee that consists of the following members: Administrator/Executive Director, Director of Nursing/Director of Quality Improvement and Education, Medical Director of designee, Consulting Pharmacist, three general staff members representing disciplines…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a safe environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection (such as Legionella). This has the potential to affect all 90 residents who reside in the facility. The facility did not maintain a water management program to prevent the spread of Legionella. The facility did not ensure laundry services were being conducted according to current standards of practice to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases between residents. One resident was not added to the line list after showing signs and symptoms of an infection according to facility policy and procedure. This is evidenced by: Example 1: The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy, dated 2/13/23, states in part: .Water Management: a. A water management program has been established as part of the overall infection prevention and control program.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances and recommendations discussed during resident group meetings (Resident Council) were acted upon promptly, according to facility policy, and that residents were allowed to meet without staff present. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the home. During Resident Council Task, 10 of 12 members voiced concerns that they do not receive follow up from voiced concerns, complaints, or suggestions for a whole month, until the next meeting. These residents indicated the facility policy states the management team will get back to them in 10 business days. During Resident Council Task, 10 of 12 members indicated the management team comes when they are not invited and at times the council wants to meet without staff present. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Resident Council, undated, includes: All residents become members of Resident Council when they are admitted to the (facility named) . Resident Council is a formal advisory body, independent of the facility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure a sufficient number of trained staff worked in the facility's food service department in order to safely and effectively carry out the meal preparation and other food and nutrition services for 3 of 21 sampled residents (R42, R40, R2) and 3 of 6 supplemental residents (R19, R16, R70). R42 voiced concerns about meals being late. Surveyor observed meals to be 45 minutes or more late. R40, R19, R16, R70, and R2 voiced concerns that their meals were often served late. Evidenced by: Facility meal time schedule reads as follows: Meal Times and Locations Breakfast 0745 - 400 & 500 Wings 0800 - Main Dining Room 0815 - 600 Wing 0830 - Room Service Lunch 1145 - 400 & 500 Wings 1200 - Main Dining Room 1215 - 600 Wing 1230 - Room Service Dinner 1645 - 400 & 500 Wings 1700 - Main Dining Room 1715 - 600 Wing 1730 - Room Service Example 1 R42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: hyperlipidemia, vitamin D deficiency, deficiency of B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 21 total sampled residents (R42) and 1 of 6 supplemental residents (R391) reviewed. R42 and R391 voiced concern the water is cold when they take a shower. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Safe Water Temperatures Policy and Procedure, dated 12/4/24, states, in part; .6. Maintenance staff will check water heater temperature controls and the temperatures of tap water in all hot water circuits weekly and as needed. 7. Documentation of testing will be maintained for 3 years and kept in the maintenance office . Example 1 R391 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, history of falling, muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic pain, and glaucoma. R391's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for 1 sampled resident (R40) and 1 supplemental resident (R34) reviewed for grievances. R40 voiced a grievance to NHA E (Nursing Home Administrator) and DON B (Director of Nursing) in August that she would like her morning catheter flush to be scheduled at 8:00 AM (note, the facility has an acceptable range to complete this between 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM) so that she is able to attend activities and church on time. Currently, R40 stated the facility is flushing the catheter after 9:00 AM resulting in her missing activities and being late for church. R40 stated, That should not be. R34 voiced a grievance of receiving her bedtime medications late. The facility did not notify her of a resolution to her grievance until 4 weeks after she voiced the concern. Evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure, Grievances, updated 8/6/24, indicates, in part, as follows: It is the policy of this facility to support…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (R16). R16 and R19 reported an allegation of abuse when staff told R16 to keep his mouth shut. The facility staff failed to report the allegation of abuse to NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and to the state agency. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, reviewed 2/25/23, includes: . Verbal abuse means the use of oral . communication . that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents . or within hearing distance . Reporting all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies . within specified timeframes: Immediately, but no later than 2 hours after allegation is made, if events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (R16). R16 and R19 reported an allegation of abuse when staff told R16 to keep his mouth shut. The facility staff failed to report the allegation of abuse to NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and to the state agency. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, reviewed 2/25/23, includes: . Verbal abuse means the use of oral . communication . that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents . or within hearing distance . Mental abuse includes but is not limited to humiliation nursing home staff . in any manner that would demean or humiliate a resident . Investigation of alleged abuse .: An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II when it was realized that a resident would reside in the facility for more than 30 days. This affected 1 of 19 residents reviewed (R65). R65's PASRR level 1 screen indicated he would only be residing in the facility for 30 days or less and was exempt from needing a PASRR level 2 screen. R65 resided in the facility for longer than 30 days and a PASRR level 2 screen was not performed. Evidenced by: The PASARR Level 1 Screen directions include, in part, the following: 42 CFR 483.128(a) requires that the resident or his/her legal representative receive a written notice (copy of this front page) if the resident is suspected of having a serious mental illness or a developmental delay, and therefore, will require a Level II Screen. You may tell the resident or his/her legal representative that the Level II Screen will determine if the resident does have a serious mental illness or developmental disability, as defined in the federal regulations, and if so, if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the residents environment remained as free of accident and hazards as possible for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R56) and 2 of 2 supplemental Residents (R54 & R141). Surveyor observed R54's motorized wheelchair (Motorized Assistive Devices) being charged in the 600 hall dining room and not behind a fire safe door. DON B stated, R141's motorized wheelchair battery is charged in the recreational/activity area on the 300 hall. Surveyor observed staff transfer R56 without a gait belt when he was feeling ill and dizzy. Evidenced by: Example 1 The facility does not have a policy and procedure for charging motorized wheelchairs. On 12/4/24 at 10:05 AM, Surveyor observed R54's motorized wheelchair battery being charged in the 600 hall dining room and not behind a fire safe door. On 12/4/24 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor spoke with DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B, where should batteries be charged. DON B stated she believes they are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who displays or is diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or attain the highest practical mental and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 2 residents (R) (R41 and R65) reviewed out of 21 sampled residents. R41's diagnosis list indicates she has a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). R41's Comprehensive Care Plan does not include known triggers, personalized interventions, and/or goals related to her past history of trauma. R65 has a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and an initial assessment did not include questions of the origin from which diagnosis was given, what it looks like for R65 when it manifests, triggers that cause R65 to experience the affects of the trauma, or interventions for staff to try if R65 has an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate was 5% or less for 35 medication pass opportunities. The facility's medication error rate was 5.71% with two (2) errors observed for R31 and R2. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, Medication Administration, dated 7/1/24, states in part, as follows: Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards Procedure: Ensure the six right of medication administration are followed: a. Right resident, b. Right drug, c. Right dosage, d. Right route, e. Right time, f. Right documentation Januvia reference - https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/021995s023mg.pdf documents: Take Januvia whole. Do not split, crush or chew. Example 1 R31's Physician Orders, signed 12/3/24, include, in part, the following medication: Januvia Tab 100 mg (milligrams) Give 1 tab by mouth one time a day related to Type 2 diabetes mellitus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure facility staff treated 1 (R5) of 16 residents reviewed with dignity and respect. Facility staff held R5's arms down and gave R5 medication in a syringe when R5 displayed agitation. R5 has dementia with severe agitation. Facility staff held R5's arms down and gave R5 medication in a syringe when R5 displayed agitation. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Medication Administration Policy date created 9/1/23, states in part: .Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice .18. Report and document any adverse side effects or refusals . The facility policy Dementia Care date created 8/1/24, states in part: It is the policy of this facility to provide the appropriate treatment and services to every resident who displays signs of, or is diagnoses with dementia, to meet his or her highest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for self-reports. On 7/9/24, the facility reported an allegation of abuse to the state agency. The facility did not complete a thorough investigation for this allegation. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy & Procedure last updated 2/25/23, states in part: .V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur .4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations .6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation . On 8/1/24, Surveyor reviewed a self-report the facility submitted regarding an allegation of abuse. Surveyor reviewed statements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for wandering and elopement potential. R2 was noted to have increased exit seeking behaviors and the facility failed to increase supervision to prevent R2 from eloping. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Elopement Policy and Procedure last updated on 6/5/24 states in part, Policy statement: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person- centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement 4. Monitoring and Managing residents at risk for elopement or unsafe wandering a. Residents will be assessed form risk of elopement and unsafe wandering upon admission and throughout their stay by the interdisciplinary care plan team .d. The interdisciplinary team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and did not ensure expired medications were removed from medication carts. This occurred for 3 of 4 medication carts/storage rooms observed. Staff administered an expired Aspirin tablet to resident (R) R6 during medication administration. During the complaint survey, 3 of 4 observations were made of stock bottles with expired dates on medication carts. Findings include: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Medication Administration dated September 01, 2023. The policy in part reads: #12. Identify expiration date. If expired, notify nurse manager . Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Medication Error dated May 22, 2023. The policy in part reads: #1. Facility shall ensure medications will be administered as follows: -c. In accordance with accepted standards and principles which apply to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, the residents' goals, and preferences for 2 of 17 residents (R63 and R56) and 4 of 4 (R325, R61, R327, and R9) supplemental residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility did not ensure R63, R327m and R9's oxygen tubing and concentrators were cleaned on a regular basis. The facility did not ensure R325 and R61's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a device that is a non-invasive form of therapy for people with sleep apnea) had been cleaned on a regular basis. R56 had two instances in the past 3 months where her oxygen equipment was not changed per Physician Order. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy, Oxygen Concentrator Policy, undated, documents, in part: Policy Statement: The purpose of this policy is to establish responsibilities for the care and use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect 7 residents on the 400, 500, and 600 wings of the facility. Nutritional supplements were not stored in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. Findings include On 9/07/23 at 9:40 AM, Surveyor observed the following: *11 unopened, thawed nutritional shakes in the 500-wing kitchenette refrigerator. These had no thaw dates. *4 unopened, thawed nutritional shakes in the 600-wing kitchenette refrigerator. These had no thaw dates. *5 unopened, thawed nutritional shakes in the 400-wing kitchenette refrigerator. These had no thaw dates. The label affixed to these nutritional shakes states the shakes should be discarded 14 days after being thawed. On 9/12/23 at 2:56 PM, Surveyor interviewed DM C (Dietary Manager), who stated that kitchen staff take the nutritional shakes from the main kitchen's freezer down to the various kitchenettes and then puts them in the freezer in each kitchen. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 17 residents (R16). R16 was observed to have a clear medication cup with 1 tablet of Colestid medication in her room on her bedside table. R16 was observed to have a clear medication cup with antifungal medication powder in her room on her bedside table. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy, Self-Administration of Medication Policy, undated, documents, in part: Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medication after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely . 4. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form, which is placed in the resident's medical record. 5. Upon notification of the use of bedside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain personal privacy for 1 one 1 (R120) supplemental resident out of a total sample of 17 residents reviewed of confidential personal medical records. Surveyor observed R120's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on an open computer located on the medication cart in the hallway. Surveyor observed a clipboard with resident names and personal health information on the medication cart with no staff present. Surveyor observed SW (Social Worker) staff have an open laptop facing the main hallway. Evidenced by: The facility's policy, Confidentiality of Personal and Medical Records, undated, states in part: . 2. Keep Confidential is defined as safeguarding the content of information including written documentation, video, audio, or other computer stored information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the individual and/or the individual's surrogate or representative . 8. Paper notes or reminder with resident's personal or medical information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM) and mobility maintained or improved function unless reduced range of motion/mobility was unavoidable based on the resident's clinical condition for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for ROM/mobility out of 17 total sampled residents (R11). R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and osteoporosis. R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 6/1/23 notes R11 is severely cognitively impaired. R11 has an Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care (APOAHC). R11's comprehensive care plans indicates R11's washcloths in bilateral hands was discontinued 3/18/23. R11's Guidelines for Daily Care, dated 9/12/23, indicates the following: Special Instructions: .Rolled up washcloths in hands, prevent contractures/skin breakdown. R11 does not receive Restorative Care such as Passive Range of Motion (PROM) or Active Range of Motion (AROM) to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure that accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 out of 17 sampled residents (R39 and R16). R39 and R16 had multiple medication errors related to not receiving medication timely as ordered by the physician. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Medication Administration Policy, undated, states, in part: . 11. b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician . Example 1: R39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (spontaneous bleeding in the brain tissue), saddle embolus of pulmonary artery (when a large blood clot gets stuck in the main pulmonary artery), pseudobulbar affect (a condition that's characterized by episodes of sudden uncontrollable and inappropriate laughing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all medication were safely and securely stored for 1 of 17 (R328) sampled residents observed. R328's medications were observed poured into a medication cup, sitting on top of a medication cart on the 600 hallway, unsecured, without staff present. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy, Medication Storage Policy, undated, states, in part: . 1.c. During a medication pass, mediations must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart . R328 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of age-related osteoporosis with current pathological right femur fracture. R328's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was not completed at the time of the survey. R328's Physician Orders include the following: 9/6/23 Aspirin EC (enteric coated) 81mg (milligram) tablet by mouth twice per day. 9/6/23 Colace 100mg capsule by mouth twice per day. 9/6/23 Biotin 1000mcg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$85,311 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $24,845 — penalty dated 2026-02-16
  • $60,466 — penalty dated 2024-12-05
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-03 for 29 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CUNNINGHAM, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2023
DOUMA, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
FUNSETH, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
KIRSZ, CHRISTINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
KLOSSNER, JILLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
LUESCHOW, KARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
MEIER, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/04/2023
MOEN, JOANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
REBEDEW, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2023
ROESSLEIN, JANISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
SHEPHERD, JOANNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
STREIFF, MATTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2023
WICKLINE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2023
OMNICAREOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
GL REHABOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2023
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-34.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 43%Medicare 12%Other / private 46%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$495per resident / day
operating cost
$15,061per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$368per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525630. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next