Christian Community Home Of Osceola, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 37.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.55 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an allegation of neglect to the State Survey Agency or local law enforcement within 24 hours after being made aware of the allegation for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed.On 05/10/26 at 10:56 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B was notified via email by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D of a neglect concern regarding R1. DON B did not submit a Misconduct Incident Report to the State Survey Agency after being made aware of concern.This is evidenced by:On 05/26/26 at 8:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D regarding quality of care of residents and reporting grievances. CNA D stated on 05/10/26, CNA D sent an email to DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding concerns of neglect. CNA D stated upon starting her PM shift, CNA D entered R1's room and found R1's incontinent brief to be overly saturated with urine and R1's legs and chest were wet with urine. CNA D stated she checked the CNA report sheet, and no one had documented changing R1's incontinent briefs since 8:15 AM. Surveyor asked CNA D if the DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation after being made aware of a concern of neglect for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed.On 05/10/26 at 10:56 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B was notified via email by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D of a neglect concern regarding R1. The facility did not immediately begin a thorough investigation of reported neglect, collect information that corroborates or disproves the incident, and document the findings.This is evidenced by: On 05/26/26 at 8:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D regarding quality of care of residents and reporting grievances. CNA D stated on 05/10/26, CNA D sent an email to DON B regarding concerns of neglect. CNA D stated upon starting her PM shift, CNA D entered R1's room and found R1's incontinent brief to be overly saturated with urine and R1's legs and chest were wet with urine. CNA D stated she checked the CNA report sheet, and no one had documented changing R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, facility did not implement professional standards of practice to ensure a resident does not develop pressure injuries (PIs), receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new PIs from developing for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed.R1 was assessed as high risk for PI development. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent PI development, ensure treatment orders were completed as ordered, and failed to complete a comprehensive assessment upon discovery of a new avoidable PI on R1's buttocks. This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Skin Alteration Policy and Procedure, with no date, states: Purpose: To establish a comprehensive facility program to maintain optimal skin condition for the residents.Policy: Nursing assessment will be utilized to identify residents at risk for the development of pressure injuries and appropriate plans of care for these residents will be established. Through the use of a skin protocol, all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that falls were thoroughly investigated to determine root cause, new safety interventions implemented, staff education, and monitoring of effectiveness of interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed.-On 12/03/25, R4 sustained a fall. Facility determined root cause of fall was that staff did not follow R4's care plan interventions of:Pressure alarms in place on bed and chair (10/02/25). Pressure and laser alarm (10/02/25). Tab alarm (10/02/25).-After fall on 12/03/25, new intervention of checking R4 every 2 hours at bedtime for alarm placement was implement. No documentation on staff education following fall and new intervention.-On 12/23/25, R4 had a fall. No new interventions were implemented. No documentation on staff education. Interventions implemented after -On 02/02/26, R4 had a fall. No new interventions were implemented. No documentation on staff education.-On 03/19/26, R4 had a fall. Care plan was not updated after fall. No…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that prevents foodborne illness to 33 out of 33 residents reviewed. The kitchen cooler contained a variety of foods not labeled with open or use-by dates. Cook Q had personal beverages on the food prep table. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, which states in part, .#4: All time and temperature control for safety (TSC) foods (including leftovers) should be labeled, covered, and dated when stored. Surveyor reviewed the policy titled, Personal Hygiene and Health Reporting, which states in part, .#1: Street clothing, coats, purses, packages, and other personal effects will be stored in employee lockers or designated storage areas and not in the kitchen . Example 1 On 05/05/25 at 9:12 AM, Surveyor toured kitchen area with [NAME] Q. Surveyor observed in kitchen cooler #10; Pulled pork opened with date of 4/30, red Jello in a container opened with no label, crushed pineapple in a container labeled 4/20, red tomato sauce in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases. The facility was not tracking infection surveillance accurately. These failures have the potential to affect 31 of the 31 residents. LPN L was observed touching medications with bare hands for 2 of 2 residents (R133 and R1) during medication pass. Improper hand hygiene observed for 2 of 4 residents (R8 and R23). Findings: The facility policy titled Nosocomial Infection Surveillance/Antibiotic Stewardship Program, states in part: The infection Preventionist is responsible for monitoring; investigating and setting forth a control plan to prevent unnecessary infections. The IP is responsible for monitoring and trending the facility infection incidence rates and this information is reviewed quarterly assurance committee with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Facility did not assess residents for safe use of the EZ sit to stand lift for 5 out of 5 residents (R) (R23. R9, R21, R12, R17). Facility does not have a procedure in place to assess appropriate EZ Way Smart Stand mechanical lift (sit to stand) slings for accurate size and fit for each resident requiring use of the EZ stand lift for transfers. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) are determining what size sling to use for each resident. Findings include: EZ Way Smart Stand Manufactures Guidelines, dated10/24/24, states: To determine the correct sling size for an EZ Way Smart stand, consider the patient's weight, height, and girth. A proper sling size will comfortably support the patient and prevent any portion of them from overlapping the edges of the sling. Harness Color Coding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 5 of 5 residents (R) reviewed (R8, R14, R232, R11, R4). -Medication storage room had 2 opened unlabeled bottles of Lorazepam for resident (R8 and R14) with unknown expiration date. -Medication storage room had 1 opened and expired bottle of Amoxicillin for R232 stored in refrigerator that expired on 04/24/25. -Medication cart had R11's Morphine Sulfate liquid bottle opened unlabeled with unknown expiration date. -Observation of prescribed Nystatin powder left unattended in R4's room during 1 observation. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 05/2018 states in part: .Procedures: J. Medication storage conditions are monitored monthly basis by the consultant pharmacist or pharmacy designee and corrective action taken if problems are identified. K. Refrigerated medications are kept in closed and labeled containers, with internal and external medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not notify the physician on call of R4's refusal of insulin for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for insulin administration (R4). Findings include: R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease stage 4, and acute and subacute hepatic failure without coma. Review of 4's medical record identified the following physician orders: - Insulin Aspart Injection Solution, inject 6 unit subcutaneously before meals for diabetes mellitus type 2 related to diabetes mellitus type 2 with hyperglycemia. Do not give insulin if Blood Glucose (BG) is less than 100. Observations: On 05/05/25 at 11:13 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) C go into R4's room to check BG for insulin administration. R4's BG was 169. RN C indicated R4 is on sliding scale but does not require any insulin since BG is adequate. RN C indicated that R4 has been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility did not implement policy and procedures related to screening employees for a prior history of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 8 employees reviewed. The facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented when one employee's background information disclosure (BID) was not obtained before employee started working at facility. (RN O). Findings include: The facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised November 2022 states in part, Employee screening and training: a. Before new employees are permitted to work with resident's board registrations and certifications regarding prospective employee's background will be checked. d. A criminal background check will be conducted on all prospective employees as provided by the facility's policy on criminal background checks. On 05/06/25 at 8:14 AM, Surveyor reviewed 8 random staff Background Information Disclosures (BID). Registered Nurse (RN) O was hired on 02/04/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI