Heritage Lakeside
1016 Lakeshore Dr, Rice Lake, WI 54868 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (715) 234-9101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $115,181 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-17)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.1% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.5% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.9% | 5.7% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.6% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.1% | 24.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.2% | 15.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.5% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.1% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.66 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 2.29 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.7%CMS range 33.1–61.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.0–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 48.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.1%CMS range 6.7–19.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 43.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.48 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.08 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.51 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.71 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) for 1 of 12 residents (R) reviewed (R46.) Beginning 03/03/26, R46 presented with a change of condition including shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, and continuous use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine. The facility failed to assess R46 with the change in condition, failed to notify the provider of R46's change in condition, failed to complete respiratory assessments as per provider order, and failed to implement new care plan interventions. These failures resulted in R46 being transferred to a higher level of care and being diagnosed with a Pulmonary Embolism (PE) requiring a pulmonary artery thrombectomy (an invasive or surgical procedure to remove blood clots from the pulmonary arteries.) The facility's failure to provide care consistent with standards of practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6 Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act), the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choice for 1 of 13 sampled residents (R1). R1 had a change in condition; staff did not complete comprehensive neurological assessments or have a Registered Nurse assess R1 as the change of condition continued. R1 was sent to the emergency room several hours later and had suffered a stroke, and as a result was put on hospice services. The facility's failure to assess R1 and provide appropriate treatment for stroke symptoms created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 11:55 a.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE]; however, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity level of D (potential for more than minimal harm/isolated) as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate fluid and food intake to maintain acceptable parameters of hydration and nutrition for 3 of 3 residents (R) (R2, R1, R19). R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2 was sent to hospital on [DATE] and returned on 03/23/24 with diagnosis of failure to thrive and laboratory results of elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine indicating dehydration. R2 was hospitalized on [DATE] with elevated BUN, creatinine, and albumin levels, resulting in R2 being transferred to another critical care hospital and expiring on 05/27/24. The facility failed to ensure R2 received adequate fluid intakes to maintain acceptable parameters of hydration to include the following: * failure to assess daily fluid intake; * failure to accurately assess and complete assessments for signs and symptoms of dehydration (e.g., sunken eyes, cool/clammy skin, dry tongue, dark colored urine, and sticky saliva); * failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent infection, and did not ensure residents received care and treatment to prevent development of pressure injuries. This occurred for 2 of 5 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries. (R1 and R11). R1 did not have a care plan with interventions in place to prevent a pressure injury and developed a deep tissue injury on the left heel, causing actual harm. R1 was not repositioned to prevent the development of pressure injuries. R11 did not have weekly assessments documented for a stage 4 pressure injury. Example 1: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline, 2019: Staff should assess and document the physical characteristics of the wound bed and the surrounding skin and soft tissue at least weekly. Weekly wound assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident (R3) at high risk for pressure ulcer development received the necessary treatment and services needed to prevent the development of a pressure injury (PI) or to prevent worsening of an existing PI. -R3 developed a facility acquired unstageable PI to right foot on 07/10/24 which became larger with a macerated center on 07/16/24 resulting in actual harm. The facility did not complete weekly comprehensive assessments of R3's PI. The facility did not ensure preventative pressure relieving measures were implemented. The PI of the right foot is cited at actual harm. -R3 acquired a PI to right buttock stage II, due to shearing on 06/12/24. Interventions to prevent friction and shearing were not put into place. The facility did not complete weekly comprehensive assessments of R3's PI. Findings include: The facility policy titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries, reads in part . Assess the resident on admission (within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 of 3 residents (R7, R5, and R1) reviewed with pressure injuries (PI) and at high risk of pressure injury development received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing of existing skin impairments or prevent new pressure injuries from developing. R7 developed a stage 2 PI to the right gluteus on 03/27/24, a stage 2 PI to spine on 05/01/24, and a stage 3 PI to the left heel on 05/13/24 which became unstageable on 5/29/24 resulting in actual harm. The facility did not initiate preventative pressure relieving measures, complete weekly comprehensive assessments of the PI, and no treatment changes or physician notification for increasing size of the PIs. This example is cited at actual harm. R1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with 4 PIs (left heel, right heel, right ischial tuberosity and penis). R1 developed a stage 2 PI to the right heel in the facility on 4/24/24. R1 did not have weekly comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions. This has the ability to affect all 38 of the facility's residents.Staff were observed to not complete hand hygiene during food preparation and service or maintain sanitary storage.Food was not labeled with identifying information. Open food is not labeled with open or use by dates and no manufacturer's label with use by date. Food was not stored in refrigerator with a cover. A scoop was found in food container, increasing food's risk for contamination.Safe food temperatures for food service were not ensured.Food was not cooled in a way to prevent contamination.Staff washing dishes contaminated their uniform with dirty water sprayed off dishes and then returned to the duty of food preparation and service with the same uniform, no barrier.This is evidenced by:Example 1 The facility policy, titled Hand Washing, dated 1/26/26, states: Staff will wash hands as frequently as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R6) of 5 residents reviewed had documentation the resident and/or legal representative had been informed in advance of the risks and benefits of prescribed psychotropic medications.R6 was prescribed Escitalopram Oxalate (a psychotropic medication). The facility did not obtain written consent from R6 or R6's legal representative.Findings include:R6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, gangrene of left leg, atherosclerosis of arteries of extremities, multiple fracture ribs, type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute pulmonary edema, and major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Surveyor reviewed R6's physician orders, which state in part, -Escitalopram Oxalate Oral Tablet 5 MG (Escitalopram Oxalate), Give 5 mg by mouth one time a day for depression. Surveyor reviewed R6's medical record and did not find an informed consent filled out for R6's depression medication Lexapro. On 03/24/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R) R20) right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed.R20 reported Registered Nurse (RN) V grabbed R20's arm. RN V yelled at R20 and stood in front of R20's wheelchair stopping him, as he attempted to get away from RN V. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Resident Safety Abuse Policy reviewed October 2023 states, Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting I harm, pain, or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents. Mistreatment means inappropriate treatment or exploitation of a resident.R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included orthopedic after care following surgical amputation of the lower extremity, acute osteomyelitis of the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse by a resident (R20) was reported immediately to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and to the State Survey and Certification Agency. An incident which R20 reported Registered Nurse (RN) V grabbed R20's arm, yelled at R20, and stood in front of R20's wheelchair stopping him as he attempted to get away from RN V, was reported to on call Nurse Manager, who did not report it to the NHA and thus the facility did not report the abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Resident Safety Abuse Policy reviewed October 2023 states, Reporting suspected violations: a. The supervisor on duty shall immediately safeguard the resident(s) and immediately report all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of residents property to the facility administrator. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the prevention of further potential abuse from occurring while an investigation was in progress for 1 out of 2 residents (R) investigated for abuse (R20).Facility did not protect R20 when allowing Registered Nurse (RN) V to continue to work with R20 when accused of verbal and physical abuse.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Resident Safety Abuse Policy reviewed October 2023 states, Procedure for investigation: . d. The Supervisor will ensure that the resident(s) is/are protected from further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included orthopedic after care following surgical amputation of the lower extremity, acute osteomyelitis of the right tibia and fibula (forearm), mild cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorder.Most recent [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 3/17/26 indicated that R20 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents/resident representative (R) (R6, R46, and R48) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, and bed hold notice.-Facility did not have a specific reason on the transfer notice for R6, R46, and R48.-Facility did not provide R6 and R46 a bed hold notice.-Facility did not notify the ombudsman of R6 and R46's transfers to the hospital.Per the Long-Term Care State Operations Manual (SOM), dated 7-23-25, regulation 483.15(c)(3) Notice before transfer. Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must- (i) notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. 483.15(c)(5) Content of Notice. The facility's notice must include all the following at the time notice is provided: -The specific reason for the transfer or discharge. Surveyor reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the healing of existing pressure injuries (including prevention of infection to the extent possible) and prevent development of additional pressure injuries for 1 resident (R26) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure injuries in a sample of 12 residentsThe facility did not provide repositioning at a minimum of every 2 hours for R26, or document refusals by R26 to be repositioned at a minimum of every 2 hours, which potentially led to development and exacerbation of a pressure injury to R26's coccyx/sacral (lower back/tailbone) area. Findings include:The facility policy, titled Policy and Procedure for The Prevention and Treatment of Skin Breakdown, not dated, states in part: It is the policy to properly identify and assess residents whose clinical conditions increase the risk for impaired skin integrity, and pressure injuries; to implement preventative measures; and to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F, LPN G and Registered Nurse (RN) H did not perform hand hygiene prior to administering medication. This affected 5 out of 5 residents (R) (R6, R34, R20, R19, R2).LPN F did not wipe off blood pressure cuff and machine prior to RN H taking and using with another resident (R33). This was evidenced by:On 3/24/26, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A stated that Surveyor had all the policies related to hand hygiene. Policy received is specifically related to food preparation. NHA did provide Surveyor with a copy of the orientation plan that shows Director of Nursing (DON) B covers Hand Washing: how, when, why, during her portion of orientation.The Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines titled, Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Health Care Workers, dated 2/27/24, states:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility document review and policy review, the facility failed to submit an initial report of an allegation of misappropriation to the state survey agency within 24 hours and failed to notify law enforcement for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation. Specifically, the facility failed to report an allegation of a missing wallet and identification cards for Resident #1 to the state agency within the required time for reporting and failed to notify the law enforcement of the allegation.Findings included:A facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, revised 11/04/2024, indicated, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The policy also specified, 6. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents sampled for allegations of misappropriation. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct interviews and/or obtain statements from staff regarding Resident #1's missing wallet and identification cards.Findings included:A facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, revised 11/04/2024, indicated, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The policy revealed, Comprehensive policies and procedures have been developed to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents. Our abuse prevention program provides policies and procedures that govern, as a minimum: e. The development of investigative protocols governing resident abuse, theft/misappropriation of resident property, resident-to-resident abuse and resident-to-staff abuse; f. Timely and thorough investigations of all reports and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans met medical needs and included preferences for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed.R1 had a fall out of wheelchair and there was no intervention added.R1 was sitting on multiple items in the wheelchair per preference that was not noted in the care plan.CAM boot was ordered from the doctor on 09/26/25 and was not added to the care plan.Findings:The facility policy titled, Fall Protocol, states, All licensed personnel are responsible for the initiation and completion of the Risk Management when a fall occurs and the Post Fall Evaluation. Licensed Personnel will implement interventions to prevent further falls. 10. The fall and interventions should be addressed in the care plan. 17. All falls will be addressed and interventions applied. Fall Assessment: . 11. Reassess resident's environment and risk of falling. 13. Implement Immediate Intervention to prevent another fall and add Risk Management report.R1 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure resident's environment was free from accidental hazards to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed.R1 was sitting on multiple items in a wheelchair, which contributed to R1 falling off the wheelchair seat during transport.Findings:According to Nemt Insurance article, dated 05/01/21, It is perfectly acceptable that additional cushioning may be an integral component to a wheelchair user's level of comfort. However, the cushion should be specifically designed by the manufacturer and integrated into the original design of the wheelchair by that manufacturer. If it isn't, then it should be removed from the wheelchair prior to transport in an effort to reduce the likelihood of severe injury if an accident were to occur. While a passenger's personal comfort is important; ultimately their safety, and the safety of those around them is more important.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include a stroke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, which had the potential to affect all 42 residents. -Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G performed a venous blood draw from R1's foot without evidence of training. -The facility did not have a system in place to evaluate licensed nurse competencies. Findings: R1, an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehab following complications from exploratory abdominal surgery. On 04/29/25, progress notes read in part, Nurse unable to obtain IV access or blood draw for labs. 2 sticks have been attempted. Nurse will pass off to oncoming shift to attempt for stat labs. On 04/30/25, progress notes read in part, Labs drawn from right foot X1 attempt. Resident tolerated well .and given to lab at 0805 am. On 04/30/25 at 9:59 AM, order entered, NP [Nurse Practitioner]-ok to obtain blood sample from foot if able. On 07/01/25 at 1:42 PM, Surveyor requested training and competency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with resident rights including services to attain or maintain the resident's highest or practicable physical, mental or psychosocial needs for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (R3 and R4). R3 and R4 did not have a care plan for an anticoagulant or risk for bleeding. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive, last reviewed 06/2022, states in part . The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough assessment Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to incorporate identified problem areas .Incorporate risk factors. Facility policy titled, Anticoagulation-Clinical Protocol, last reviewed 06/2022, states in part . The staff and physician will monitor for possible complications in individuals who are being anticoagulated signs of excessive bruising, hematuria, hemoptysis, or other evidence of bleeding . Example 1 R3, a [AGE] year-old-female, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual abuse. The facility did not implement interventions to protect other residents (R) from exposure of R3's genital area. This affected 2 of 3 residents reviewed for sexual abuse. (R1 and R2) On 03/21/25, R3 exposed his penis in proximity to R1 and R2 in the west dining room. No new interventions were implemented and the previous intervention of placing a blanket on R3's lap was not effective. Findings include: The facility's Abuse policy, with a revision date of 10/2023, indicates: It is the policy of our facility to maintain a work and living environment that is professional and free from threat and/or occurrences of harassment, abuse (verbal, physical, mental, or sexual), neglect corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, physical or chemical restrains not required to treat the residents' medical symptoms, exploitation and misappropriate of resident property. Immediate interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility did not ensure they stored, prepared, distributed, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food policy safety. The facility failed to label and date perishable items found in the refrigerator. This has the potential to affect all 33 of 33 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Food Storage, dated 09/23/24, states, 12. Leftover food will be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item will be clearly labeled and stated before being refrigerated. Leftover food is sued within 7 days or discarded as per the 2022 Federal food code. On 01/12/25 at 8:53 AM, during initial brief tour of the kitchen, Surveyor observed food items in the refrigerator were not labeled correctly. Surveyor observed an open bag of cherry jam dated December 2nd as the open date. Surveyor observed chopped onions in the refrigerator that were in a container not labeled. Surveyor observed an open milk jug that was half empty not labeled with an open date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and record review, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional practice. This had the potential to affect 7 out of 7 residents (R) (R2, R14, R17, R20, R32, R33, R136) for proper storage and 1 of 1 resident (R) (R18) for proper labeling. 16 new unopened insulin pens and one bottle of Humalog were found in an out of temperature range refrigerator. R18 did not have an accurate label for insulin. Findings include: Example 1 The facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, dated November 2020, states: . The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 3. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparations areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. 7. Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses' station or other secured locations . The facility policy, titled Refrigerators and Freezers, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) of 12 sampled residents (R21) was reasonably accommodated for personal needs. R21's room is set up so that he cannot access or use his sink. This is evidenced by: R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to: Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, with fluctuations; difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/24, indicated that R21 uses a wheelchair and a 4 wheel walker for mobility. R21's care plan, dated 11/26/24, states: ADL: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Parkinson's disease, weakness, encephalopathy. Ambulation: Ambulate assist of two 250', follow with w/c and use personal 4ww (leave walker in hallway after use so resident does not attempt to use on is own) or distance as tolerate by resident and safe gait pattern. On 01/12/2025 at 1:01 PM, Surveyor interviewed R21 and his Family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) receive the necessary services to maintain safety and personal hygiene (hand hygiene) for 1 out 4 residents (R). R21 does not receive hand hygiene services after toileting or when in his room. This is evidenced by: The policy, titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated August 2019, states, This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to: Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, with fluctuations; non-Alzheimer's dementia; needs assistance with personal care; weakness; difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/24, indicated that R21 needs assist with his personal hygiene and activities of daily living. For example, he has been assessed as needing substantial/maximum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. The facility did not implement orders received for a resident with a foot wound upon reception of the order. Resident (R) 137 did not see a decline with the wound. This has the potential to effect 1 of 3 residents investigated for wound care. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Prevention of Skin Breakdown dated 07/02/2018, states, It is the policy to properly identify and assess residents whose clinical conditions increase the risk for impaired skin integrity, and pressure ulcers: to implement preventative measures; and to provide appropriate treatment modalities for ulcers according to industry standards . A . 4. implement interventions according to the resident Braden Score and/or individual risk factors identified. R137 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the residents' safety through adequate supervision or use of safety devices in 2 of 4 residents, (R)21 and R30. Staff did not use a gait belt when transferring R21, and R21 was left unsupervised during cares. R30 had a recent fall with the new intervention to prevent falls not updated on the care plan. This is evidenced by: Example 1 The policy, titled Policy NO: 007-004 Subject: Gait Belts, dated April 2023, states, It is the policy to require the use of transfer belts for resident transfer and walks as indicated in the resident's plan of care or as needed to ensure resident's safety. R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to: Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, with fluctuations; encephalopathy, unspecified; non-Alzheimer's dementia; needs assistance with personal care; weakness, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible. The facility was not able to produce a reason to have Resident (R) 24's catheter changed on a monthly basis. This had the potential to affect 1 of 1 resident observed for catheter care (R24). Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests changing indwelling catheters or drainage bags at routine, fixed intervals is not recommended. Rather, it is suggested to change catheters and drainage bags based on clinical indications such as infection, obstruction, or when the closed system is compromised. The facility policy that was received from the facility titled Foley Catheter Insertion, Male Resident which was not given a review data, did not have any standards regarding the standards of practice for frequency of catheter removal. R24 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services for a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 1 residents (R) R18 reviewed for respiratory assessment related to medication administration. R18 was administered a nebulizer treatment without a lung assessment completed prior to and after treatment. Findings include: According to the National Library of Medicine (2021), the standard of nursing care expected with small volume nebulizer treatment includes: .respiratory assessment pre/post treatment, respiratory rate, heart rate, and oxygen saturation. After treatment, the patient should be encouraged to cough and perform oral care. The patient's respiratory system should be reevaluated after the administration of inhaled medications to document therapeutic effects, as well as to monitor for adverse effects. R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a pertinent diagnosis of chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident ((R)27) who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. This is evidenced by: R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with current diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition, difficulty walking, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and major depression. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] a quarterly assessment documented R27's Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R27's depression screen PHQ -9 score of 12, indicating moderate depression severity. The MDS documented R27 would often socially isolate. The facility did not comprehensively assess history of trauma, triggers which may cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a policy identifying those circumstances when loss or damage of dentures is the facility's responsibility. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. The facility failed to promptly, within 3 days, refer residents with lost or damaged dentures for dental services for 1 of 1 (R5) resident reviewed for missing dentures. R5's partial upper denture was lost on 11/01/24. They were not replaced and dental services were not provided after dentures were missing. Findings include: The facility was unable to provide Surveyor with a policy specific to missing dentures. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of diabetes mellitus II, anemia, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. R5's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating cognition is intact, makes self understood, and able to understand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 out of 4 residents (R18, R22) during care observations. Staff did not complete hand hygiene during personal cares for 1 of 4 residents (R18) during personal cares. Staff did not disinfect reusable medical equipment after use with R18. R22 did not have enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) in place. Findings include: Example 1 Facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, with a revised date of 08/2019, stated in part: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 1. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the State Agency, an allegation of abuse immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (R1). R1's family member reported an allegation of staff bending R1's fingers back to cause pain to try and get R1 to stand up. The facility did not report this allegation of abuse to the State Agency. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating reads, in part . All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. 1. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure 2 out of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), (CNA BB, CNA DD), employed at the facility for more than one year received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training each year. This has the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility. This is evidenced by: On 09/23/24, Surveyor requested in-service training hours for CNA BB and CNA DD for review. CNA BB's date of hire is 09/16/22, and the facility did not provide 12 hours of in-service training, which included communication, behavioral health, and dementia care. CNA DD's date of hire is 12/22/15, and the facility did not provide 12 hours of in-service training, including communication, behavioral health, and dementia care. CNA BB and CNA DD have the potential to work with all residents in the facility. Surveyor requested in-service training completion for CNA BB and CNA DD from both the Director of Nursing (DON) B and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A three different times during the survey. The facility did not provide Surveyor with the requested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility did not ensure staff used proper hand hygiene when distributing food. This has the ability to affect 5 of 43 residents (R11, R14, R15, R16, R17) residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility policy, entitled, Food Preparation and Service, dated April 2019, states, Bare hand contact with food is prohibited. Gloves are worn when handling food directly and changed between tasks. Disposable gloves are single use items and are discarded after each use. On 09/16/24 at 11:52 AM, Surveyor observed the serving of food by Dietary Aide (DA) S. DA S was touching the meal tickets which were not a cleanable surface and then touching ready to eat foods. DA S grabbed R14's bun with gloved hands after touching tickets and then placed the bun on R14's plate for distribution. With the same gloved hands, DA S did the following: DA S touched the pizza and peas on R15's plate then distributed the food. DA S touched…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff did not sanitize the mechanical lift after use in another resident room, prior to using it for resident (R)11. Staff did not perform hand hygiene with glove changes during incontinent cares for R11 and R1 Staff did not wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a resident room (R9) labeled Droplet Precautions. Staff did not wear gloves when obtaining a blood sample for blood glucose monitoring for R11. Staff did not wear proper personal protective equipment for enhanced barrier precautions when providing care for R18 and R3. Findings include: According to CDC Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities, multi-use patient care equipment should be properly cleaned and disinfected between patients. Facility policy and procedure entitled, Handwashing/Hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promptly notify and consult with a resident's physician when there was deterioration in a resident's clinical condition. R12 presented with symptoms of low blood pressure. R12's physician was not notified for all low blood pressure occurrences as was instructed by orders. This occurred for 1 of 4 residents (R12), reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Blood Pressure, Measuring revision date September 2010, states: 6. Hypotension is defined as blood pressure less than 100/60 mm/hg . 9. Hypotension should be reported to the physician. Staff should record several readings throughout the day, including before and after meals. R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, cellulitis of right lower limb, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, (primary) hypertension, persistent atrial fibrillation, acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 13 residents was provided privacy during personal cares. *Surveyor observed staff leave the window drapes and privacy curtain open while providing cares to R1. *Surveyor observed R1's breasts exposed from hallway. Findings include: R1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included in part: Alzheimer's disease, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, and atherosclerotic heart disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/23/24, identified R1 scored 3 during a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating impaired cognition. R1 had no impairment to upper or lower extremities. R1 was independent with eating, supervision for oral hygiene, partial assistance rolling from left to right in bed, and dependent on toileting, upper/lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. MDS dated [DATE] indicated significant change in status, and MDS was not completed to show R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 7 sampled residents (R) who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. (R1) Findings include: R1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included in part: Alzheimer's disease, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, and atherosclerotic heart disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/23/24, identified R1 scored 3 during a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating impaired cognition. R1 had no impairment to upper or lower extremities. R1 was independent with eating, supervision for oral hygiene, partial assistance rolling from left to right in bed, and dependent on toileting, upper/lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. MDS dated [DATE] indicated significant change in status, and MDS was not completed to show R1's current physical funcationality.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident was assessed for removal of the catheter and had no orders in place for a foley catheter. For 1 of 1 residents (R) R1 reviewed with urinary catheters. R1 has an indwelling foley catheter without a physician order to direct the care and treatment for the catheter. Staff did not assess and prevent complications of catheter during R1's care. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, dated 08/22, states in part, - .Input/output: 1. Observe the residents urine level for noticeable increases or decreases. -Maintain unobstructed urine flow: 1. Check the resident frequently to be sure he or she is not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks. 4. If the catheter material contributes to obstruction, notify the physician, and change the catheter if instructed to do so. 5. Catheter irrigation may be ordered to prevent obstruction in residents at risk for obstruction. -Complications 1. Observe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure staff followed procedures for the accurate administration of insulin. Staff did not complete a safety check by priming the needle on two insulin pens to ensure the injectable pens were dispensing insulin before administration for 2 of 3 residents (R), (R8 and R11). Findings include: Manufacturer's instructions for insulin pens state in part.Priming your pen: Priming means removing the air from the Needle and Cartridge that may collect during normal use. It is important to prime your Pen before each injection so that it will work correctly. If you do not prime before each injection, you may get too much or too little insulin . Step 6: To prime your Pen, turn the Dose Knob to select 2 units. Step 7: Hold your Pen with the Needle pointing up. Tap the Cartridge Holder gently to collect air bubbles at the top. Step 8: Continue holding your Pen with Needle pointing up. Push the Dose Knob in until it stops, and 0 is seen in the Dose Window. Hold the Dose Knob in and count to 5 slowly. You should see insulin at the tip of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional. Staff did not ensure that medications that could be potentially harmful were secured. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident's (R13) rooms observed. Findings include: Facility policy, entitled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated February 2023 states, If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medication or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these issues . Medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Each residents' medications and biologicals are locked when not in use . On [DATE] at 1:38 PM, Surveyor observed insulin pens sitting on the bedside table in R13's room unattended. R13 was not in the building and was receiving dialysis. R13's door was open and insulin pens could be seen from the doorway. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an incident of potential misconduct to the state agency immediately upon learning of the incident and did not submit the 5 day investigation within 5 days as required. The facility practice had the potential to affect 1 of 12 residents reviewed for abuse (R7). The facility administration learned of the incident when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E flushed R7's feeding tube on 06/28/24. The facility did not report the incident to the state agency until 07/10/24 via a Misconduct Incident Report (5-day Investigation). No immediate initial reporting was submitted. Findings include: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Resident Safety Abuse Policy dated as last reviewed 10/23. The policy in part read: Purpose: It is the policy of our facility to maintain a work and living environment that is professional and free from .neglect . Federal Definitions: Neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation and complete appropriate actions to correct an alleged violation affecting 1 of 12 residents (R) reviewed for potential abuse (R7). Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E flushed R7's feeding tube with warm water to make sure it was patent when she found R7's feeding tube not attached. The facility investigation included limited staff interviews, no resident interviews, and no post incident education to staff as a corrective action in attempts to prevent further incidents. Findings include: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Resident Safety Abuse Policy dated as last reviewed 10/23. The policy in part read: Purpose: It is the policy of our facility to maintain a work and living environment that is professional and free from .neglect . Federal Definitions: Neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure services were provided by a qualified person in accordance with resident's written plan of care. The facility practice had the potential to affect 1 of 12 sampled residents (R7). Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E flushed R7's feeding tube with warm water to make sure it was patent when she found R7's feeding tube not attached to R7. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed R7's care plan and noted: Focus: Resident requires tube feeding r/t (related to) swallowing problem. Date Initiated: 11/30/24. Goal: Resident will be free of side effects or complications related to feeding through review date: 10/08/24. Interventions: Resident is dependent with tube feeding and water flushes. See MD orders for orders. R7's orders were reviewed with the following noted: 12/28/23: four times a day Flush PEG tube with 250 ml four times daily Surveyor reviewed the misconduct incident report (5-day investigation) submitted to OCQ. The incident report noted as submitted 7/10/24 notes: Date discovered: 6/28/24. Time occurred: 11:15 AM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R4) reviewed with non-pressure injuries. -On 07/07/24, R4 developed a facility acquired non-pressure injury to his left heel. Documentation indicated staff was checking R4's heels and feet twice daily for skin issues. Weekly wound assessment on 07/08/24 is not accurate and indicated R4 had no skin concerns. On 07/16/24, R4 had developed two additional facility acquired non-pressure injuries to left and right foot and his previous non-pressure injury had worsened, this was not documented in a weekly wound assessment. Findings: Example 1 R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, renal dialysis, failure to thrive, weakness, and difficulty walking. Minimum data set (MDS) assessment, completed on 06/16/24, confirmed R4 scored 15/15 during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide the needed supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (R6 and R11). Facility staff did not provide supervision while R6 was eating breakfast. Speech Therapy caregiver instructions and care plan indicated R6 requires supervision to eat. Facility staff did not provide supervision while R11 was eating breakfast. R11's caregiver instructions and care plan indicated she requires supervision to eat. This is evidenced by: Example 1 R6's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/30/24 notes R6 eats independently. Follow-Up Caregiver Instructions: Referred by: Speech therapy (ST) dated 09/09/23 indicated: Issue: Swallowing Strategies: .Soft bite sized foods, thin liquids Activities to be performed with Resident: 1. Patient needs to be upright and alert for all meals, snacks, and meds. 2. Small bites-chew food well. 3. Small sips. 4. Alternate food and drink. Add butter or gravy, sauces etc. to foods that are dry. 5. Remain upright for 30 minutes after meal. Supervision at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess and provide necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for pain management. R1 expressed increased pain utilizing a pain scale. The facility did not administer as needed medications when R1's pain was elevated. The facility did not document the effectiveness of as needed pain medications, when used. The facility did not follow R1's care plan to provide maximum comfort related to hospice care and terminal diagnosis. Findings: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 9:30 AM, after hospitalization. Diagnoses included vertebral osteomyelitis (bone infection), lumbar fractures, inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus (a blood clot in a large abdominal vein), blood clots in bilateral femoral veins, abdominal cavity bleed, pulmonary blood clot, recurring urinary tract infections, heart failure, muscle pain and stiffness due to inflammatory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill set necessary to care for a resident's needs, as identified through resident assessment, and described in the plan of care, for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). R2's NPWT malfunctioned, and staff were unable to continue R2's NPWT. Findings: R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization for occlusion of right popliteal artery (the main artery supplying blood to the lower leg). A surgical procedure was performed to reduce pressure in R2's right lower leg, by making two incisions to the inner and outer right calf. R2's admission orders included NPWT to right outer calf and follow up with vascular surgery in 7-10 days. R2's hospital discharge summary stated, NPWT was indicated to promote tissue formation and increase healing time. Consequences of not using NPWT include delayed wound healing, infection, and sepsis. R2's care plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure staff performed proper handwashing during personal cares for 1 (R3) of 8 sampled residents. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Hand Washing/Hand Hygiene, dated 04/2024, states: Indications for Hand Hygiene: 1. Hand hygiene is indicated: a. Immediately before touching a resident; b. Before performing an aseptic task (for example, placing an indwelling device or handling an invasive medical device); c. After contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces; d. After touching a resident; e. After touching the resident's environment; f. Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same resident and g. Immediately after glove removal. 3. Wash hands with soap and water: a. When hands are visibly soiled; b. After contact with infectious diarrhea, including, but not limited to, infections caused by norovirus, salmonella, shigella, and C. difficile. 5. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene. Applying and Removing Gloves: 1. Perform hand hygiene before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not have sufficient nursing staff to ensure the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for five residents (R6, R7, R10, R11, and R12). R6, R7, R10, and R11 were not out of bed or prepared to eat meal when trays were delivered. R6, R7, R10, R11, and R12 waited over 40 minutes to eat after meal trays were delivered to floor. R6 and R7 were not provided adequate assistance with meal. R12 did not receive a meal tray. Findings: R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after hospitalization from 01/15/24-02/06/24. R6 was previously living at home with family member providing care. Diagnoses included history of stroke with left sided paralysis, wounds to buttocks and heels present on admission, chronic pain syndrome, type 2 diabetes, anxiety, weakness, and assistance with personal cares. R6 has had a 21# weight loss since admission. R6's care plan indicated nutritional risk status, and resident to be up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were updated for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R6). R6's care plan did not include areas for skin/wounds, pain, and refusal of cares. Findings include: R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after hospitalization from 01/15/24-02/06/24. R6 was previously living at home with family member providing care. Diagnoses included history of stroke with left sided paralysis, wounds to buttocks and heels present on admission, chronic pain syndrome, type 2 diabetes, anxiety, weakness, and assistance with personal cares. Hospital history and physical briefly reported multiple skin wounds to hips and abdomen on 01/15/24, reporting R6's refusals of examination multiple times. Hospital discharge plan reported diagnosis of incontinence associated dermatitis, no orders. R6's minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 02/12/24 confirmed R6 scored 10/15 during Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderately impaired cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that medications ere administered in a manner to prevent a medication error in technique Medication technique errors were identified for residents (R4 and R9). R4 was not instructed to rinse and spit after receiving an inhalation medication. R9 was not instructed to or assisted with applying pressure to the inner corner of the eye after receiving medicated eye drops. Findings: Example 1 R4's physician orders included budesonide-formoterol fumarate aerosol (Brand name Symbicort), two puffs inhale two times daily for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rinse mouth and expectorate after use. Important safety information for Symbicort indicates localized infections of the mouth and throat have occurred, and patients should rinse the mouth after administration. On 03/06/24 at 10:10 AM, Surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) C administer R4's medications. Surveyor observed RN C administer R4's inhaler without instructing or encouraging R4 to rinse and spit after. Surveyor interviewed RN C. RN C stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 34 residents that reside in the facility. This is evidenced by: On 12/13/23 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor completed an interview with Corporate Administrator (CA) F about PBJ submissions. CA F stated during that time period there was a change in the Business Office Manager and that he himself would have been responsible to submit the PBJ for the 3rd quarter. Surveyor then requested and reviewed the staff schedules for that time period (April 1 - June 30, 2023) and compared the data with time punches. There were no concerns uncovered related to licensed staff coverage or certified nursing assistant coverage. There were shortages of registered nurse coverage of at least 8 consecutive hours in a 24-hour time period for three dates. These were: - Sunday, 04/2/23 - Saturday, 04/22/23 - Sunday, 04/23/23 On 12/13/23 at 10:25 AM, Surveyor interviewed CA F regarding registered nurse coverage. CA F confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-13 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to submit Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandatory Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data for the third quarter of 2023 (April 1-June 30). This has the potential to affect all 34 residents. This is evidenced by: Surveyor noted the facility failed to submit PBJ data for Fiscal Year Quarter 3. On 12/13/23 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor completed an interview with the Corporate Administrator (CA) F about the PBJ submissions. CA F stated during that time period there was a change in the Business Office Manager and that he himself would have been responsible to submit the PBJ for the 3rd quarter. CA F stated that he missed it and did not submit the data for the third quarter. CA F stated that the facility was staffed adequately and there was no shortage of staffing during that time period. Surveyor then reviewed the staff schedules for that time period (April 1 - June 30, 2023) and compared the data with time punches. There were no concerns uncovered related to licensed staff coverage or certified nursing assistant coverage.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect 34 of 34 residents (R) residing in the facility. -Legionella Water Management plan did not include a team that meets regularly, a flow diagram indicating potential areas of opportunity, control measures, or monitoring. -Infection control line listing of infections was not completed accurately or thoroughly. Findings include: Water Management Plan: The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention - Water Management Program (Legionella) dated 10/2023, reads in part: .This policy addresses our facility's water management program elements in line with accepted American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 188, state and local regulations. 1. Water Management Program Team: a. The Facility's Water Management Program is overseen by the Water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure practices were not used to restrict a resident's freedom of movement when staff were observed locking resident's wheelchair brakes. The facility practices affected 1 of 1 resident (R139). This is evidenced by: Surveyor requested and reviewed the facility policy titled Use of Restraints dated as revised on April 2017. The policy indicates: Policy Statement: Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the residents . Restraints shall only be used to treat resident's medical symptoms and never for discipline or staff convenience . Policy Interpretation: Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot easily remove, which restricts freedom of movement . On 12/11/23 at 12:19 PM, Surveyor observed R139 seated at dining room table across from the rehabilitation nurse's station. Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure 1 of 4 residents reviewed (R18) for pressure injuries (PI) received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent new ulcers from developing. This is evidenced by: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) 2019, page 115, . Repositioning and mobilizing individuals is an important component in the prevention of pressure injuries. The underlying cause and formation of pressure injuries is multifaceted; however, by definition, pressure injuries cannot form without loading, or pressure, on tissue. Extended periods of lying or sitting on a particular part of the body and failure to redistribute the pressure on the body surface can result in sustained deformation of soft tissues and, ultimately, in tissue damage . According to Wound Care Education Institute (WCEI) 2018, for immobile or bed bound individuals, a full change in position should be conducted a minimum of every two hours. Some individuals require more frequent repositioning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide the needed supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (R17). This is evidenced by: On 12/11/23 at 12:04 PM, Surveyor observed R17 sitting at a table in the small lounge/dining area on the rehabilitation wing. Staff brought R17's meal tray over to the table. Surveyor observed staff exit the dining room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D was observed at the nurse's station with her back to the dining room where R17 was eating. There were no other staff present in the dining room. R17 consumed most of the chicken alfredo and beverages. At 12:21 PM, R17 stood from table, used her walker, and exited the dining room. There were no staff present in the lounge/dining room to cue or prompt R17 while she ate. Surveyor reviewed R17's record and noted a physician order that read: 09/06/23: FEEDING INSTRUCTIONS; supervision, monitoring recommended to cue: small bites, small sips, slow rate of intake. Alternate solid/liquid/solid/liquid. Increase moisture with foods that are dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure 1 of 4 residents reviewed (R18) for pain control, received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to manage pain. This is evidenced by: R18 has medical diagnoses that include but are not limited to, cerebral vascular accident (CVA) due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of the left carotid arteries, cerebral infarction with hemiparesis and hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side, aphasia, metabolic encephalopathy, primary osteoarthritis, a current stage II PI of the right medial ankle, recent fracture of the left hip (08/06/23), muscle weakness, rhabdomyolysis and severe right leg contracture at the knee. On 12/11/23 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed R18 asking about her pain control. R18 stated that she . has pain in the arms, legs and back, it hurts all the time. They don't treat the pain, it hurts all the time. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDSA), which was a quarterly assessment with the assessment reference date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not identify specific targeted behaviors with individual behavioral goals and approaches or have a system in place to monitor the effectiveness of medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (R26). This is evidenced by: Surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated as revised on December 2016 which indicates the following: Policy Statement: Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-re-review. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: ~Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. ~The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a residents behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms and risk to resident and others. ~Staff will observe,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R1) out of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for behaviors, received adequate supervision, or had interventions implemented to prevent behaviors of exposing genitals to female residents. *R1 displayed sexually inappropriate behavior by exposing self to R2 in the facility library. *R1 displayed sexually inappropriate behavior by exposing self to R3 upon entering R3's room. Findings: Example 1: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to other toxic encephalopathy, unspecified mood (affective) disorder, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, disorientation-unspecified, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15, which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. R1 requires limited assist with mobility, transfer eating, dressing, toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-16 · tag F0839 — widespreadEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 1 of 3 staff reviewed had the proper licensure or certification in accordance with Wisconsin state law licensure requirements. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents in the facility. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, who was an agency staff LPN, worked in the facility from 06/17/23 to 08/01/23 without a Wisconsin nursing license. Findings: On 08/15/23 at 1:35 p.m., Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON) B for proof of Wisconsin nursing licenses for 2 staff, and 1 certified nurse's aide (CNA) Wisconsin state registry certification. On 08/16/23, the Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) J provided documents on the licensure of the requested staff. LPN C's documentation showed a Wisconsin driver's license, and a Minnesota nursing license. (Minnesota is not a compact licensure state with Wisconsin). LPN C did not have a Wisconsin nursing license. LPN C worked at the facility from 06/07/23 to 08/01/23 without a Wisconsin nursing license. On 08/16/23 at 11:45 a.m., Surveyor interviewed DON B and CNC J and asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure their abuse, neglect, and misappropriation policy was implemented for 1 of 3 staff reviewed for background checks. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C did not have a criminal background check completed. Findings: The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention program, dated 2001 MED-Pass, revised April 2021 states, in part: .Policy Interpretation and Implementation 4. Conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has: a. been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law . On 08/15/23 at 1:35 p.m., Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON) B for background checks on LPN C, LPN D and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E. On 08/16/23, Clinical Nurse Consultant (CNC) J provided Surveyor with facility documentation. Surveyor reviewed the documentation provided on the background checks. LPN C did not have a criminal background check completed prior to working in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to law enforcement. This occurred with 1 of 2 facility self-reported investigations reviewed (Resident R2.) The facility did not ensure the conclusion of the investigation was reported to the state agency (SA) no later than 5 working days of an incident. This occurred with 1 of 2 facility self-reported investigations (Resident R1.) R2 exposed R2's penis in front of R3. The facility did not report the incident to law enforcement. The facility did not submit the conclusion of the investigation of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verbal abuse towards R1 to the SA no later than 5 working days of the incident. Findings: Example 1 The facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, dated 2001 MED-PASS, revised April 2021 states, in part: .Reporting Allegations to the Administrator and Authorities 2. The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-15 · tag F0620 — widespreadNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure facility's admission packet did not request or require residents to waive potential facility liability for losses of personal property. This failure had the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility's Resident Handbook dated 2023, pg. 14, states in part: Personal Furnishings and Possessions: .Should something be missing or in need of repair inform your care team, social worker, or representative immediately so that we can assist with location or repair. Our goal is to keep your items safe, however, Heritage Lakeside is not responsible for replacing misplaced items. On 01/14/25 at 11:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A regarding facility policy on misappropriation of resident's property. NHA A stated the facility's resident handbook is given to all residents and clearly states the facility is not responsible for resident's missing or lost personal items. Surveyor asked NHA A if there were any variances to this policy. NHA A stated, no, that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-15 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they notified the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. All residents investigated for hospitalizations did not receive a notice of transfer. Four of four residents (R) investigated (R21, R22, R24, R20) did not receive notice of transfer. Findings include: Example 1 R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include non-st elevation (nstemi) myocardial infarction, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, adult failure to thrive. R24's [NAME] Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/08/24, indicated that R24 left and returned on 12/13/24 Record review of progress noted dated 12/12/24 at 2:25 PM indicated that R24 On 12/8 sent to ER on 12/9 report of suspected rib fracture. On 12/11 received final report and resident has a right 1st rib fracture. Resident has not complained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not post the required daily information correctly. The facility did not ensure to include the resident census and facility name on all daily postings in the last 30 days. This has the ability to affect all 33 of 33 residents. Findings include: On 01/13/25 at 2:10 PM, Surveyor observed daily posting located next to the elevator near the entrance. The daily posting was missing the daily resident census and the title of the facility. On 01/15/25 at 11:17 AM, Surveyor observed daily posting located next to the elevator near the entrance. The daily posting was missing the daily resident census and the title of the facility. On 01/15/25 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor reviewed last 30 daily postings. 17 of the postings were missing the daily resident census. Out of the last 30 postings, six were missing the facility name. Out of the last 30 postings, six were missing both facility name and resident census. On 01/15/25 at 1:38 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B regarding expectations for daily facility postings.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$115,181 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $115,181 — penalty dated 2024-06-17
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-16 for 105 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARKOWITZ, ALAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2020 |
| MILLER, ARIEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2020 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $360K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525654. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.