Kinnic Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 46.2 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-06-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, the facility did not ensure full time Director of Nursing (DON) coverage. This has the potential to affect all 48 residents. Former DON C resigned effective 06/17/25. The facility did not have a full time DON from 6/17 - 6/30/25. This is evidenced by: On 06/30/25 at 8:15 AM, Surveyors entered the facility and requested to meet with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A or DON B. Social Worker Assistant (SWA) D stated DON B works part-time Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) E is on vacation. On 06/30/25 at 4:05 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A asking about a full-time 40 hour a week DON. NHA A stated DON C left on 06/17/25 with no advance notice and DON B was initially hired to start in August in full-time status. DON B agreed to start on 06/17/25 part-time until August, when DON B could work full time. NHA A stated ADON E is here full-time and is on vacation this week. NHA A stated ADON E is a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Surveyor asked NHA A if there was a plan of an interim DON to be full-time 40 hours a week. NHA A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 1 resident sampled, R1. The facility did not adequately monitor and assess R1's ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt having the potential to result in serious complications. This is evidenced by: According to the National Institute of Health, VP shunts should be regularly monitored and assessed for complications. Signs and symptoms of shunt malfunction/infection include headache, lethargy, diplopia, nausea, vomiting, seizure, irritability, fever, and neck rigidity. Shunt system has to be assessed manually for proper function and visible for evidence of redness or swelling along the shunt tubing. Additional assessment of abdomen should be completed regularly monitoring for abdominal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that may result in ascites, pseudocysts, or inguinal hernia. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of congenital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 3 of 3 residents (R), R2, R5, and R1 reviewed. R2, R5 and R1 had fallen; the facility did not initiate immediate intervention to prevent future falls, investigate the root cause of the fall and review and revise care plan fall interventions. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Falls Management, with no initiated or reviewed date, states in part: Policy: The facility strives to reduce the risk for falls and injuries by promoting the implementation of the Risk Reduction: Falls and Injuries Program. Residents are assessed for fall risk factors. The interdisciplinary team works with the residents and family to identify and implement appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries .Procedure: 3. Discuss goals and interventions with resident/family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill set necessary to care for a resident's needs, as identified through resident assessment, and described in the plan of care, for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt care, R1. The facility did not provide training and education to licensed staff to ensure competency in the care of R1's VP shunt. This is evidenced by: Facility Assessment, dated 08/07/24, states in part: .Competencies: Kinnic considered the .clinical characteristics of the resident population to determine the skills and competencies required to meet our resident needs. We identified four categories of competencies: knowledge, assessment, pharmacological/treatment/care considerations, and technical/hands-on skills. Refer to the worksheet Facility Education/Staff Competencies Necessary to Care for Resident Population. The worksheet identifies which staff require certain competencies and skill sets, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) received a performance review every 12 months for three of three CNAs reviewed (CNA C, CNA D, CNA P). The facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that performance reviews were being done for any of the facility CNAs. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. This is evidenced by: On 06/10/25, a sample of CNAs employed by the facility was selected for review for the completion of annual performance reviews. The facility provided the following information: CNA C has been employed at the facility since 12/15/20. An annual performance review could not be located. CNA D has been employed at the facility since 09/2019. An annual performance review could not be located. CNA P has been employed at the facility since 12/06/21. An annual performance review could not be located. On 06/10/25 at 8:15 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A about yearly performance evaluations on staff. NHA A was not able to find yearly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility did not prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff were observed not allowing thermometer to dry prior to checking temperatures of food items and not inverting mixer and bowls in storage. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. Findings: Example 1 On 06/08/25 at 10:45 AM, Surveyor conducted the initial tour of kitchen with [NAME] T who has been on staff 12 years. Surveyor observed the Kitchen Aide mixer on the counter with bowl under it that was not inverted. Surveyor also observed large industrial size mixer in kitchen with bowl stored under it which was not inverted. Neither of the mixers were covered. Surveyor interviewed [NAME] T and asked what the normal way is to store when not in use. [NAME] T stated both mixers are used 2-3 times a week and stored uncovered and not inverted when not in use. Surveyor observed a rack of large bowls and pans that were not inverted. [NAME] T stated that is normal to store the rack of dishes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate reporting of the mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The facility failed to enter accurate data in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system from 7/1/24 - 3/31/25 which triggered excessively low weekend staffing. This has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. This is evidenced by: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, states in part: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS.1.2 Submission Timelines…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0555 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to allow resident the right to choose physicians/treatment options for 1 of 18 residents (R) reviewed. (R4). -Facility denied R4 the right to follow up with the wound provider of choice. R4 wanted to follow up with the VA wound provider and not the facility in-house provider. -R4 was seen by provider of choice and when returned to the facility with new orders, staff told R4 the facility will not do those treatments and had the attending physician discontinue the orders. Findings include: According to the Board on Aging and Long-term Care, residents have a right to self-determination which includes, in part: - Offered choices and allowed to participate in decisions important to you. - Expect a reasonable accommodation of your needs and preferences. - Participate in the planning of your care and services, and to receive care and services in a way that respects your personal and cultural wishes. - Request, discontinue or decline care and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) of non-coverage for residents (R) whose Medicare Part A coverage was discontinued with benefit days remaining for 2 of 3 residents (R) reviewed. (R43, R33) R43 and R33 were discharged from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining and remained in the facility. The facility did not provide an ABN informing the residents of their liability once Medicare coverage ended. Findings include: On 06/09/25 at approximately 9:00 a.m., Surveyor reviewed documents provided by the facility for residents who had been discharged from Medicare Part A with benefit days remaining. R43 start of services: 4/14/25, Last Covered Date (LCD): 6/02/25, notice of non-coverage 5/29, with no notice of patient liability provided to R43. R43 remained in the building. R33 start of services: 4/01/25, LCD: 5/30/25, notice of non-coverage 5/27/25 and no notice of liability was provided to R33. R33 remained in the building. On 06/09/25 at 2:13 PM, Surveyor interviewed Business Office Manager (BOM) I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for 1 of 18 residents (R) reviewed for abuse (R98). The facility did not ensure all staff were trained on the abuse policy, did not complete audits of staff to protect residents from abuse, or ensure staff knowledge of the abuse and reporting policy, and did not have a quality improvement plan to prevent further verbal abuse. This is evidenced by: Facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation with no date implemented, read in part, II. Employee Training, B. Existing staff will receive annual education through planned in-services and as needed .III. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, H. Assigning responsibility for the supervision of staff on all shifts for identifying inappropriate staff behaviors .VIII. Coordination with QAPI, A. The facility has written policies and procedure that define how staff will communicate and coordinate situations of abuse, neglect,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI