No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maplewood Of Sauk Prairie

245 Sycamore St, Sauk City, WI 53583 · For profit - Corporation · 107 certified beds · (608) 643-3383 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (608) 643-3383 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Nov 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
80 1st St · (608) 643-3311 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
333 Phillips Blvd · (608) 643-5182 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
724 Phillips Blvd · (608) 643-8438 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1535 Hemlock St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
65 13th St · (608) 643-6064

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.1%16.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.6%5.7%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.5%18.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.8%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.9%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.2%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.8%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.5%15.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.391.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.922.291.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.4%CMS range 52.8–67.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 5.7–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.2–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.79
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
46.4%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for wandering and elopement potential out of a sample of 6 Residents.R3 was identified as having a behavior of exit seeking. R3's elopement risk assessment was not accurate or complete and R3's care plan did not contain interventions or goals related to exit seeking.When R3 eloped, staff did not follow the facility policy and procedures for a missing resident, for wandering/elopement, and for a code alert.The facility's failure to assess, care plan, and supervise a resident who was at risk for elopement, created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 3/16/26. Surveyor notified NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and DON B (Director of Nursing) of the immediate jeopardy on 6/23/26 at 1:21 PM. The immediacy was removed and corrected on 3/18/26; the deficient practice is being cited as past noncompliance. Evidenced by:Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-02 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not include as part of its QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 5 of 5 randomly sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility.CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, and CNA N did not receive and have documented mandatory yearly QAPI in-service training. Evidenced by:The Facility Assessment, last reviewed 1/2026, states in part:. Staff Training/Education and Competencies/Recruitment/Retention: 3.4 Staff will be provided with training and education to assure competent care is provided to residents in the facility. Training/education will be provided upon hire with the orientation process, routinely on a yearly basis and as needed if issues arise. The following training topics will be included in this process (this is not an all-inclusive list):*Communication.*Resident Rights.*Abuse.*Infection Control.*Culture Change.The following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-02 · tag F0946 — widespread
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interview and record review, the facility did not include as part of its compliance and ethics program an effective way to communicate the program's standards, policies, and procedures through a training program for 5 of 5 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) randomly sampled. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility.CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, and CNA N did not receive and have documented yearly compliance and ethics in-service training.Evidenced by:The Facility Assessment, last reviewed 1/2026, states in part:. Staff Training/Education, and Competencies/Recruitment/Retention: 3.4 Staff will be provided with training and education to assure competent care is provided to residents in the facility. Training/education will be provided upon hire with the orientation process, routinely on a yearly basis and as needed if issues arise. The following training topics will be included in this process (this is not an all-inclusive list):*Communication.*Resident Rights.*Abuse.*Infection Control.*Culture Change.The following competencies be reviewed (this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides must be no less than 12 hours per year and did not include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training for 5 of 5 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) randomly sampled. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility.CNA J, CNA K, CNA L, CNA M, and CNA N did not receive and have documented yearly 12 hours of continuing education including dementia management and abuse prevention training. Evidenced by:The Facility Assessment, last reviewed 1/2026, states in part:. Staff Training/Education, and Competencies/Recruitment/Retention: 3.4 Staff will be provided with training and education to assure competent care is provided to residents in the facility. Training/education will be provided upon hire with the orientation process, routinely on a yearly basis and as needed if issues arise. The following training topics will be included in this process (this is not an all-inclusive list):*Communication.*Resident Rights.*Abuse.*Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. This has the potential to affect the census (76).The facility staff line lists do not monitor specific symptoms.The facility staff line lists do not record dates of last symptoms or return to work dates.Evidenced by:The facility policy, entitled Infection Control Policy, dated 6/2025, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of Maplewood of Sauk Prairie to ensure the Infection Control Program is designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment that helps prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection.The Infection Control Program will:Investigate, control, and prevent, to the extent possible, infections in the facility.Surveillance: .Outcome surveillance will be used to identify and report evidence of an infection.c. If a pattern or grouping of infections is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This has the potential to affect 1 of 2 residents (R49) reviewed for activities. Per Surveyor interview with R49 and staff, R49 could not leave her room for activities due to her roommate being on isolation for gastroenteritis symptoms. R49 was not offered any activities in her room during this time. R49 participated in activities regularly prior. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Activities Policy, dated 6/2025, states, in part: . It is the policy of Maplewood of Sauk Prairie to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not establish an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 1 Supplemental Resident (R98) and 1 of 1 sampled resident (R4). R4 and R98 were treated with antibiotics without meeting McGeers Criteria. The facility did not have an antibiotic stewardship conversation with R4 and R98's Provider. Evidenced by:The facility's policy entitled Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policy, dated 7/2025, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .4. The program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. a. Antibiotic use protocols: . ii. Laboratory testing shall be in accordance with current standards of practice.iii. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized for 1 of 5 residents (R29) reviewed for immunizations.R29 was not offered the pneumococcal vaccine. The facility does not have a declination or consent for the pneumococcal vaccine for R29.Evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Immunization/Vaccination Policy, dated 6/2025, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of Maplewood to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from infectious disease by offering our residents, staff members, and volunteer workers immunization/vaccination against such diseases.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .2. Immunizations will follow current CDC (Center of Disease Control) guidance and scheduling based on the specific vaccinations.3. Residents, staff, and volunteer workers will be offered immunizations against…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the appropriate agencies for 1 of 1 abuse allegations involving a resident (R1).On 11/6/25, an allegation of sexual abuse toward R1 from a staff member was reported to the facility and the facility did not report the allegation of abuse to the State Agency.The facility's abuse policy states, in part:*An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur.*The facility will have written procedures that include: reporting of all alleged violations to the administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a.) Immediately, but no later than 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. On 11/6/25, an allegation of sexual abuse toward R1 from a staff member was reported to the facility and the facility did not investigate the allegation. The facility's abuse policy states, in part:*An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur.*The facility will have written procedures that include: reporting of all alleged violations to the administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a.) Immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b.) Not later than 24 hours if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported to the State Survey Agency for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (R4, R5, and R6). R4 filed a grievance regarding R5 verbally abusing R4. Staff observed R5 throw a cup of soup across the room and swear. Then staff observed R4, who was in the room at the time to be in an upset state. The facility did not report the resident to resident allegation/verbal abuse to the state agency. R6 voiced an allegation of a male coming in her room and attacking her, pulling off her stockings and pants without notice, and leaving her to feel violated. The facility failed to report this allegation of abuse to the state agency. Findings include: The facility's policy, titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation Policy and Procedure, reviewed 7/2024, includes: . The facility will not tolerate abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident's property. All allegations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are thoroughly investigated for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (R4, R5, and R6). R4 filed a grievance regarding R5 verbally abusing R4. Staff observed R5 throw a cup of soup across the room and swear. Then staff observed R4, who was in the room at the time to be in an upset state. The facility did not conduct a thorough investigation including interviewing other residents who may have knowledge of R5's behavior or the incident. R6 voiced an allegation of a male coming into her room and attacking her, pulling off her stockings and pants without notice, and leaving her to feel violated. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation including interviewing all staff who worked with R6 recently or other residents who may have knowledge of the alleged incident. Findings include: The facility's policy, titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation Policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff properly air-dried plates prior to storage. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 31 of 31 residents who resided on 2 of 4 hallways out of a total census of 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Manual Ware Washing, dated 10/13/14, revealed, Purpose: To ensure dishes are properly cleaned and sanitized during manual ware washing. III. Procedure: .7. Allow dishes to air dry . Example 1 During an observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 9:40 AM of the kitchenette serving area located on the Oak hallway the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed three plates were found to be wet. These plates had been placed in the cabinet for use. The DM stated, They were put away wet, they should have been left out to air dry longer. The Oak hallway had a census of 15. Example 2 During an observation and interview on 9/23/24 at 9:51 AM of the kitchenette serving area located on the Evergreen hallway the Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (R3) observed during screening. R3 was observed to have her medications left at the bedside. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Addendum: Self Administration of Medications, undated, states in part, . Policy: Prior to allowing a resident to administer medications without direct supervision by licensed nursing staff, the resident's ability to do so will be assessed and doctor's order will be obtained . 2. Physician will be updated with resident's desire to administer medications without direct staff supervision, following set up of the medications by nursing. If physician is in agreement with the assessment made by staff and is okay with the resident taking medications without direct supervision, an order shall be obtained . R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include acquired absence of right leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make prompt efforts to document, investigate, and resolve grievances a resident may have for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for grievances (R1). The facility's Social Worker (SW) documented that R1's spouse had concerns with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), fluid intake, soiled bed linens, and staffing; these concerns were not documented as grievances, investigated as grievances, or had a resolution provided to R1's spouse. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Grievance Policy and Procedure no date, states in part .Grievances can include things such as concerns about care and treatment provided or not provided, behavior of staff or other residents and any concerns related to the resident's stay in the facility .3. To file a grievance, the resident and/ or resident representative shall contact the facility grievance officer(s). The grievance can be filed orally, in writing, or by completing a Grievance Report Form. a. [facility name] grievance officers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and safety to prevent accidents from occurring for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1) for falls. R1 had multiple falls while at the facility. Facility staff did not update the care plan after each fall, notify the physician promptly after a fall with a head injury, and complete and document neurological checks timely. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Fall Prevention and Assistive devices for Fall Prevention last updated on [DATE], states in part: .Procedure: 1. Each resident will have a fall risk assessment tool completed (located within [EHR (Electronic Health Record)] upon admission, quarterly, with a significant change, following a fall and at the nurses' discretion .3. Each resident who is at risk for falls based on the falls assessment tool will have a falls care plan .5. Each resident will have an individualized interventions put into place to help achieve the goals of care .6. Post Fall Management: .e.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Example 3 The facility policy entitled, Infection Control Policy and Procedure, updated 6/23, states in part: . Hand Hygiene: Consistent and proper hand hygiene practices are critical in preventing the spread of infection by preventing the spread of germs, including multi-drug resistant organisms. Hand hygiene means cleaning your hands by means of hand washing (using soap and water) or alcohol-based hand sanitizer (also referred to alcohol-based hand rub or ABHR) . 1. The following is a list of some situations that require hand hygiene. Note: there are many situations which require hand hygiene, and it is not possible to list all these situations . g. before and after handling food. (Hand washing with soap and water). h. Before and after assisting a resident with meals . p. Before donning and after doffing gloves and after removing PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) . 2 . Hand washing procedure is as follows: a. Wet hands with clean, running water, apply soap and rub hands together vigorously for at least 20 seconds covering all surfaces of the hands and finger, then rinse hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure that accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 out of 4 sampled residents (R63, R326, and R32). R63, R326 and R32 had multiple medication errors related to not receiving medication timely as ordered by the physician. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Medication Administration Policy and Procedure, dated July 2022, states, in part: . Policy: Medication will be delivered to resident in accordance with the Physician's orders, manufacturer's specifications regarding preparation and administration and the accepted professional standards and principles. Procedure: Medication Administration Times ~ AM: 7am to 10:30am ~ Midday: 11am to 2:30pm ~ PM: 3pm to 6:30pm ~ HS (hours of sleep): 7pm to 10:30pm ~ NOC (night): 11:00pm to 2:30am ~ Early AM: 5am to 6:30am . Routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility must develop policies and procedures to ensure that residents and/or resident responsible party receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization prior to offering the immunization and documentation is noted in the medical record on whether the resident received or declined the immunization, this affected 2 of 5 residents (R20 and R1) reviewed for immunizations of 18 sampled residents. R20 did not have a pneumococcal immunization offered and no documentation. R1 did not have a pneumococcal immunization offered and no documentation. This is evidenced by: The facility's Immunization Policy and Procedure, dated 10/22, states, in part: . Policy: All residents will be provided education and offered influenza and pneumococcal vaccine, per the recommended schedule put out by the CDC (Centers of Disease Control) and the Advisory Committee on immunization practices . Procedure: . Pneumococcal Immunization 1. Eash resident's immunization status will be reviewed. If the resident is eligible for any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-09-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and staffing document review, the facility failed to ensure daily posted staffing requirements were in place to include the census, number of staff, and number of staff hours for 71 of 71 residents residing at the facility. This failure had the potential to affect the ability of residents and families to view the staffing information daily. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 9/24/24 at 3:46 PM, there was a book located at the nursing station that contained a staffing assignment sheet. The assignment sheet listed the name of the facility, the names of the staff, and the current date. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated this assignment sheet, located in the book was their posted staffing sheet. She stated she kept a tally of hours in her office but the sheet in the book was used as a live staffing assignment listing. The sheet contained the names of the staff working in the halls. She confirmed the sheets lacked the census, number of Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), number of Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), number of Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NURSING HOMES COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/07/1971
BENISH, RONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/07/1971
ECKER, CAROLEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
GALARNYK, GREGORYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
GALARNYK, JOHNIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/24/2024
KRAEMER, KEVINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/07/1971
MELLI, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
REUSCHLEIN, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
SNYDER, MICHAELINEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2016
WILKES, CAROLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2024
ARROW CPAS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2025
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/30/2009
EDERER, LEAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2017
DICKMAN, ALEXANDRAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$636K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 14%Other / private 35%

This home reported $636K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,048per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$381per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525462. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next