Sheboygan Senior Community Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care was provided in accordance with a physician order for 1 resident (R) (R9) of 16 sampled residents.R9 had a diabetic heel ulcer. An Apligraf (a bioengineered, bi-layered skin substitute that contains living human keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and bovine collagen commonly used to treat diabetic foot ulcers) was applied at a podiatry appointment on 11/3/25 with an order not to remove the graft. Staff removed the graft on 11/4/25 and did not inform the podiatry clinic. During a podiatry appointment on 11/11/25, it was noted that the Apligraf was missing and R9's ulcer had worsened. R9 was hospitalized for nine days and diagnosed with osteomyelitis (a bone infection). R9 required surgical debridement and both intravenous (IV) and oral antibiotics. The facility's lack of order entry process along with not following current orders/not clarifying orders with the physician resulted in the Apligraf being removed between 11/3/25 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 57 residents residing in the facility. The microwaves on all three households contained dried food debris. Food items in the dry storage area were not label with use-by dates. Equipment in the main kitchen was not stored to prevent contamination. Findings include: On 1/13/26 at 2:09 PM, Surveyor interviewed Dietary Manager (DM)-R who stated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. Microwave Cleanliness: The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils: (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. The Wisconsin Food Code documents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R36, R37 and R63) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication had documentation that indicated the resident and/or their legal representative were thoroughly informed of the risks and benefits of prescribed psychotropic medication. R36 was prescribed duloxetine (antidepressant medication). The facility did not ensure an Informed Consent for Medication form was thoroughly reviewed and completed with R36. R37 was prescribed lorazepam (antianxiety medication) and desipramine (antidepressant medication). The facility did not ensure Informed Consent for Medication forms were thoroughly reviewed and completed with R37. R63 was prescribed buspirone (antianxiety medication) and citalopram (antidepressant medication). The facility did not ensure Informed Consent for Medication forms were thoroughly reviewed and completed with R63. Findings include: The facility's undated Psychotropic Medication policy indicates: .1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of an emergent hospital transfer for 1 resident (R) (R10) of 6 sampled residents.R10 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) on 11/25/25 for evaluation. The Ombudsman was not notified of the transfer. In addition, Social Worker (SW)-L was not aware of the need to notify the Ombudsman of hospital transfers if the resident returned to the facility.Findings include:The facility's undated Discharge policy did not include Ombudsman notification of hospital transfers.From 1/12/26 to 1/15/26, Surveyor reviewed R10's medical record. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease. R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/5/26, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R10 had intact cognition.R10's medical record indicated R10 was transferred to the ED on 11/25/25 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 3 residents (R) (R36, R1, and R28) of 16 sampled residents.R36's MDS assessments, dated 1/2/26 and 12/3/25, indicated R36 received hypnotic medication. R36 was not prescribed a hypnotic medication.R1's MDS assessment, dated 10/13/25, indicated R1 received parenteral feeding. R1 did not receive parenteral feeding. R28's MDS assessment, dated 11/20/25, did not indicate R28 was on dialysis. R28 was on dialysis since admission to the facility on 8/14/25. Findings include: The facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Health Information Process policy, dated September 2025, indicates: .3. (Named Company) will upload all relevant information including the resident's history and physical, hospital discharge summary, medical visits, imaging, and labs. (Named Company) completes authorizations, updates, audits, and coding .6. Section K is completed by the Registered Dietitian .8. Sections H,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care and services to prevent pressure injuries from developing and/or promote healing was provided for 2 residents (R) (R8 and R36) of 6 sampled residents.On 11/20/25, R8 was noted to have a stage 1 pressure injury on top of the head. The facility did not ensure preventative measures were implemented to prevent further skin breakdown which resulted in a stage 2 pressure injury on top of R8's head.On 12/26/25, R36 was re-admitted to the facility from an acute hospital stay with a stage 2 pressure injury on the left buttock. On 1/3/26, the facility documented that R36 developed a stage 2 pressure injury on the right buttock. The facility did not ensure initial evaluations and/or wound assessments were completed to monitor R36's pressure injuries.Findings include:The facility's undated Pressure Injuries Overview/Staging policy indicates avoidable means the resident developed a pressure ulcer/injury and that one or more of the following was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not complete a fall report to determine the root cause of a fall, update a care plan, or implement post-fall monitoring for 1 resident (R) (R8) of 1 sampled resident. R8 had an unwitnessed fall on 1/8/26. The facility did not complete a fall incident report or post-fall neurological checks. In addition, the facility did not update R8's care plan with a preventative safety intervention.Findings include:The facility's undated Assessing Falls policy indicates: .6. Observe for delayed complications of a fall for approximately seventy-two hours after a fall and document findings in the medical record .8. Complete an incident report for a resident fall no later than 24 hours after the fall occurs. The incident report should be completed by the nursing supervisor on duty and submitted to the Director of Nursing (DON) .When a resident falls, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record . 2. Assessment data, including vital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 3 residents (R) (R10, R15, and R62) of 3 sampled residents.R10, R15, and R62 did not have orders or care plans for nebulizer (a medical device that turns liquid medicine into a fine mist allowing it to be inhaled directly into the lungs to treat respiratory conditions) cleaning.Findings include:The facility's undated Administering Medications Through a Small Volume Nebulizer policy indicates: .Steps in the Procedure: .26. Rinse and disinfect the nebulizer equipment according to facility protocol, or: a. Wash pieces with warm, soapy water; b. Rinse with hot water; c. Place all pieces in a bowl and cover with isopropyl (rubbing) alcohol. Soak for five minutes; d. Rinse all pieces with sterile water (not tap, bottled, or distilled); and e. Allow to air dry on a paper towel .28. When equipment is completely dry, store in a plastic bag with the resident's name and date.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure vital signs, weight, and monitoring of the fistula site were completed before and after dialysis for 1 resident (R) (R28) of 1 sampled resident.R28's medical record did not contain orders to obtain vital signs or weight or monitor the fistula site pre- or post-dialysis. Findings include: The facility's Dialysis policy, dated October 2025, indicates: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan .to meet the medical needs of the resident receiving hemodialysis .Compliance Guidelines: .4. The licensed nurse will communicate to the dialysis facility via .dialysis communication form or other form, that will include but not limit itself to: .b. Vital signs .d. Nutritional/fluid management including documentation of weights .7. The nurse will monitor and document the status of the resident's access site upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency (SA) for 2 residents (R) (R4 and R6) of 7 sampled residents. On 11/22/24, R7 notified staff that R1 was physically aggressive toward R4 on 11/21/24. The facility did not report the allegation of abuse to the SA. On 11/22/24, R1 initiated a resident-to-resident altercation with R6. The facility did not report the allegation of abuse to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation policy, revised 5/2023, indicates: It is the policy of the facility to encourage and support all residents, staff, families, visitors, volunteers, and resident representatives in reporting any suspected acts of abuse .Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents .Any nursing home employee or volunteer who becomes aware of abuse, mistreatment, neglect,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 2 residents (R) (R4 and R6) of 7 sampled residents. On 11/22/24, R7 notified staff that R1 was physically aggressive toward R4 on 11/21/24. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse. On 11/22/24, R1 was physically aggressive toward R6. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation policy, revised 5/2023, indicates: The facility will immediately begin a thorough investigation of any reported incident, collect information that corroborates or disproves the incident and document the findings for the incident .A root cause investigation and analysis will be completed. A thorough investigation is an investigation that adequately addresses the circumstances of the allegation. The investigation will include the facts necessary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI