Wi Veterans Home-Boland Hall
21425 E Spring St, Union Grove, WI 53182 · Government - State · 158 certified beds · (262) 878-6702 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $281,174 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-12)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 28.0% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.1% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.8% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.9% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.9% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 5.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.7% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.7% | 15.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.68 | 1.66 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 61.4 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 97 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.22 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.07 to 1.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-10-01 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — patternHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide 5 residents (R4, R7, R11, R12 and R15) of 11 residents reviewed with the necessary cares and services to promote quality of life and assist residents to maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. *The facility did not provide R7 with the sense of safety within the Facility from R6. R7 indicated being in fear of R6, a resident who displayed escalating aggressive behaviors. R7 was assaulted by R6 and was assessed as experiencing Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD) as a result. R6 went on to assault R5 a few weeks later. The facility did not have a plan to effectively monitor R6. * The facility failed to provide R4 a sense of satisfaction with oneself, the environment, and the care received. R4 has continually expressed dissatisfaction with the living at the facility. R4's dissatisfaction with the facility has caused R4's behavior of planning unsafe ways of leaving the facility. R4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 6 (R2, R11, R4, R3, R8, and R10) of 7 residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents from falls and elopements * R2 has had 15 falls since 1/9/25. On 1/17/25 R2 fell. A fall risk assessment on 1/17/25 indicates R2 is at low risk for falls. On 3/5/25 the facility completed another fall risk assessment and was assessed to be high risk for falls. R2 fell on 4/1/25, 4/3/25, & 4/7/25. R2's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] assesses R2 as low risk for falls. R2's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] and subsequent fall risk assessments assess R2 as high risk for falls. On 4/3/25 R2 was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a traumatic hematoma of the forehead. The facility did not thoroughly investigate R2's falls on 4/1/25, 4/3/25, & 4/7/25, did not determine if prior interventions were in place and did not determine a root cause of these falls to prevent further falls. On 4/9/25 R2 fell. R2 was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from abuse affecting 2 of 11 residents (R7 and R5) reviewed for abuse concerns.On 7/17/25, R6 punched R7 in the head and mouth, resulting in R7 having a bloody lip. R6 was placed on 1 on 1 supervision for a short period of time. The facility indicated they did not have the staffing to keep a person on 1 on 1 supervision long term. R6 was then put on 15-minute checks. R6 continued to demonstrate aggressive behaviors where staff needed to intervene before the behaviors escalated. On 8/27/25, R6 hit R5 multiple times over the head with a cane. R5 was sent to the hospital where R5 was diagnosed with a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) - subdural hematoma (a collection of blood between the brain's outer covering and the surface of the brain,) small traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (a bleeding that occurs in the space between the brain and the arachnoid mater, one of the membranes covering of the brain,) and acute (sudden onset of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 5 of 15 residents reviewed (R6, R14, R15, R12 and R11) received medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. * R6 has had 13 episodes of aggressive behaviors toward staff and other residents since 7/26/24, On 7/17/25, R6 punched another resident in the mouth. On 8/25/25, R6 hit R5 on the head with R6's cane, resulting in a traumatic brain injury for R5. The facility did not identify and seek ways to support R6's psychosocial and behavioral needs by reevaluating and assessing R6's behaviors. The facility did not identify and promote non-pharmacological approaches to care that met the mental and psychosocial needs of R6 and did not assess and identify possible transition of care services for R6 The facility's failure to provide R6 with necessary medically related social services, created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 7/17/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that 1 out of 4 residents (R2) reviewed remained free from sexual abuse. R2, a female resident with a significant history of PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) and a history of sexual assault was inappropriately sexually touched by R1. The facility's failure to keep R2 safe from and free from sexual abuse created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 5/6/25. Surveyor notified NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A and DON (Director of Nursing)-B of the immediate jeopardy on 5/29/25 at 3:50 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 5/30/25, however, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity level of D (potential for more than minimal harm/isolated) as the facility continues to implement its action plan. Findings include: The facility's policy last revised on July 2, 2024 and titled, Prohibition and Prevention of Member (Resident) Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation documents: *All staff shall be expected to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility's policy and procedure titled, Member Rounds, with a last revision date of January 7, 2025, documents: Rounding shall be defined as nursing staff accounting for all members assigned to their unit frequently using the 4 Ps of rounding and purpose. It should be understood rounding is not every 2 hours as that is merely an absolute minimum: rounding is a continual event. One round should flow into the next round, this is how rounding reduces fall, skin breakdown, and other accidents and injuries.- Walking rounds shall occur at AM (morning) into PM (afternoon) and PM into NOC (night) shift change with CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) staff from oncoming and outgoing shifts.- A walking round shall be considered when staff physically walk the unit to observe each member and their status, any noted change of the member shall be promptly reported to the on-duty nurse.2.) R1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include repeated falls, dependence on other enabling machines and devices, unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-12 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who displays or is diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or attain the highest practical mental and psychosocial well-being for one (R2) of 4 residents reviewed. *R2's social history documents R2 experiencing trauma as an adult including sexual assault and having war related trauma resulting in a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD). R2's Life Events Checklist for DSM-5(LEC-5) indicates R2 has a history of trauma and R2's comprehensive care plan was not individualized with known triggers, person-centered interventions, and/or goals related to R2's past history of trauma. Based on R2's history of trauma, R2 is vulnerable and on 5/6/25, the facility did not protect R2 from unwanted sexual contact from R1. Findings Include: Surveyor noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R2) of 6 residents reviewed received medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. * R2 eloped from the facility during a hospital appointment. R2 eloped from the hospital and was found at a hotel room approximately seven hours later. R2 had voiced and made it known to facility staff that R2 wanted to leave the facility and R2 was not provided with discharge/placement services. Findings include: 1.) R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes COPD, Dementia with Mood Disturbance, Dementia with Moderate Anxiety, PTSD and mild cognitive impairment. R2's Annual MDS dated [DATE] does not documents that R2 has short and long term memory problems. The MDS documents a PHQ-9 mood assessment score of 6, indicating that R2 has mild depression. Section GG documents that R2 has no impairment to R2's upper or lower extremities and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries or at risk for pressure injuries received appropriate care and treatment to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 1 of 5 residents (R18) reviewed for pressure injuries. *R18 was noted to have multiple facility acquired open areas to their bilateral buttocks on 8/30/23 that were not assessed upon discovery. At this time, the physician was not consulted with, the care plan was not revised with interventions, and a treatment was not initiated based upon an assessment of the wounds. The pressure injuries were not assessed until 9/13/23. At that time the resident was noted to have 2 stage 3 pressure injuries. The assessment on 9/13/23 states the wound bed is 100% subcutaneous tissue (this is bottom layer of skin in your body that consists of loose connective tissue, larger blood vessels and is the major fat storage layer) without additional description of necrotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and served in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 67 of 67 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not accurately test parts per million (PPM) of the sanitizing solution or complete testing logs. Findings include: On 4/20/26 at 10:16 AM, Surveyor and Dietary Services Director (DSD)-C began an initial tour of the kitchen. DSD-C stated the facility follows the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 4-501.114 Manual and Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Chemical Sanitization-Temperature, pH, Concentration, and Hardness: A chemical sanitizer used in a sanitizing solution for a manual or mechanical operation at contact times specified under 4-703.11(C) shall meet the criteria specified under 7-204.11 Sanitizers, Criteria, shall be used in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered label use instructions. The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 4-501.116 Warewashing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect all 67 members (M) residing in the facility. The facility's infection surveillance program did not include a system to monitor employee illness symptoms, resolution of symptoms, or return to work dates.M5 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-J transferred M5 without donning the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Staff did not offer members hand hygiene before meals, including M51, M60, M20, and M28.Staff did not ensure M45's catheter bag was covered and not in contact with the floor. Findings include; The facility's Infection Tracking and Surveillance policy, dated 4/17/25, indicates: The facility's Infection Preventionist designee shall be responsible for conducting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of transfers/discharges for 6 members (M) (M9, M7, M31, M11, M68, and M5) of 6 sampled members. M9 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], 11/29/25, 12/25/25, and 2/26/26. Ombudsman (OMB)-H was not notified of the transfers.M7 was transferred to the hospital on 2/7/26, 2/26/26, and 3/11/26. OMB-H was not notified of the transfers. M31 was transferred to the hospital on 1/23/26 and 2/3/26. OMB-H was not notified of the transfers. M11 was transferred to the hospital on 1/6/26 and 1/30/26. OMB-H was not notified of the transfers.M68 was transferred to the hospital on 3/9/26 and did not return to the facility. OMB-H was not notified of the transfer/discharge.M5 was transferred to the hospital on 3/6/26. OMB-H was not notified of the transfer.Findings include: The facility's Notice of Transfer policy, dated January 2023, indicates: A designated employee sends a list of members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not offer Prevnar 20 vaccines for 3 members (M) (M6, M7, and M31) of 5 sampled members.M6, M7, and M31 were eligible to receive the Prevnar 20 vaccine. M6, M7, and M31 were not offered the vaccine. The facility's Immunization Program, dated 4/17/25, indicates: All immunizations shall be offered and administered according to the most current guidance. Specific vaccines: Pneumococcal: 1. Licensed nursing reviews pneumococcal vaccine status on admission and at least annually and references the most current recommendations. 2. It is recommended that staff utilize the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) PneumoRecs Vax Advisor to assist in determining the member's pneumococcal status and needs. 1. On 4/22/26, Surveyor reviewed M6's medical record. M6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnosis including diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and pneumonia. M6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/4/26, had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not identify resident concerns as grievances for 1 (R1) of 1 Residents reviewed for grievances.Social Worker-Q did not initiate grievances when R1's power of attorney voiced a concern R1 was being put to be too early and R1 did not receive an eye drop medication according to physician orders.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Grievances and Complaints and last reviewed January 31, 2023, under Purpose documents To provide members and their representatives with a process to assist in writing concerns or complaints regarding the environment, missing items, or care and treatment provided by WVH (Wisconsin Veterans Homes). Under policy documents *A grievance shall be considered any circumstance thought to be unjust and grounds for a complaint and meets at least one of the following criteria: Pertains to the environment or care and treatment provided by the Homes, including missing property. Has reference to state or federal regulations, facility policies, or Member Rights and Responsibilities. Requires facility management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident's unaccounted for narcotic medication was reported to the local police. This was observed with 1 of 3 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) reviewed.R2's narcotic medication was discovered unaccounted for and was not reported to the local police.The facility's policy and procedure titled Prohibition and Prevention of Member Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation date 7/2/2024. The Policy documents: The Facility shall comply with Section 1150B [42 U.S.C. 1320b-25} Reporting to Law Enforcement of Crimes Occurring in Federally Funding Long-term Care Facilities. All incidents shall be investigated and reported to the appropriate agency as required by the agency.Findings include:Surveyor reviewed a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) regarding R2's missing narcotic medication. The FRI investigation documents there was a missing tablet of Hydrocodone 5/325 milligrams. This was discovered missing on 9/5/2025 through an audit. The medication was missing on 8/16/2025. The FRI investigation does not indicate the local police were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure quality of care was provided for 1 (R1) of 6 Residents.R1's ophthalmology consult on 9/8/25 includes documentation under Blepharoconjunctivitis OS (left eye) to continue polymyxin- trimethoprim one drop four times a day to left eye. The facility did not continue this order and discontinued the eye drops on 9/8/25. R1 did not receive polymyxin- trimethoprim one drop four times a day to left eye according to physician orders.Findings include:R1's diagnoses include Alzheimer's Disease (progressive brain disorder that causes gradual cognitive decline), dementia (loss of cognitive function that interferes with a person's daily life and activities), central corneal ulcer (open sore on the cornea caused by an infection or other condition), left eye and conjunctivitis (inflammation of the eye's conjunctiva most caused by viruses, bacteria or allergies).R1's nurses note dated 9/4/25, at 8:30 a.m., and written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-J documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to ensure each resident's environment remains free of accidents and hazards for 1 (R10) of 3 residents.On 10/18/25 during a body check R1 was identified with a skin tear over purple senile purpura to the right side of R1's clavicle. There is no evidence staff were interviewed to inquire how R1 may have received this skin tear and did any staff observe R1 picking his clavicle. On 10/21/25 R1 sustained a skin tear due to the arm of a shower chair having a sharp area. The facility removed the chair but there is no preventative measures documented to prevent this from occurring in the future. On 12/2/25 & 12/3/25 there are multiple observations of R1's plan of care not being followed for non-slip material (Dycem) on the wheelchair and padding of the lower portion of the front bars on R1's wheelchair.Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Member Incidents and with an effective date of November 1,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure pharmacy procedures were followed to identify an unaccounted for narcotic medication. This was observed with 1 (R2) of 4 resident medication reviews. R2 was missing a narcotic medication on 8/16/25 that was not discovered until 9/5/25.Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Controlled Substances dated 7/1/2004. This documents under Procedures: 4.) At time of administration, the licensed nurse compares the last recorded remaining medication count in the Electronic Health Record (HER) with the bubble pack/ medication package and enters the new remaining count value after the ordered dose(s) is prepared for administration/application. The number being administered is also recorded in the appropriate column of the Controlled Substance Perpetual Inventory sheet.Surveyor reviewed a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) involving R2's medication. The FRI document on 9/5/25, during an audit, 1 tablet of Hydrocodone 5/325 milligrams was missing. The FRI investigation determined the 1 tablet was missing from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-10-01 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all facility staff received required Effective Communication program training for 7 of 8 facility staff that was reviewed. This has the potential to affect the 71 Residents who reside at the facility and have the potential to receive care from Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and Food Service Assistants (FSA). Findings Include:On 09/30/24, at 12:35 AM, Surveyor reviewed CNA-TT, CNA-VV, CNA-WW, CNA-XX, LPN-I, LPN-N, and FSA-ZZ completed trainings for the past year and noted there was no documentation that CNA-TT, CNA-VV, CNA-WW, CNA-XX, LPN-I, LPN-N, and FSA-ZZ received training on the facility's effective communication program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Effective Communication program. On 9/30/24, at 1:09 PM, Surveyor requested missing training of the facility's Effective Communication program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Effective Communication program from NHA (Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-10-01 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all facility staff received required Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program training for 7 of 8 facility staff that were reviewed. This has the potential to affect the 71 Residents who reside at the facility and have the potential to receive care from Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) and Food Service Assistants (FSA).Findings Include:On 09/30/24, at 12:35 AM, Surveyor reviewed CNA-TT, CNA-VV, CNA-WW, CNA-XX, LPN-I, LPN-N, and FSA-ZZ completed trainings for the past year and noted there was no documentation that CNA-TT, CNA-VV, CNA-WW, CNA-XX, LPN-I, LPN-N, and FSA-ZZ received training on the facility's QAPI program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program. On 9/30/24, at 1:09 PM, Surveyor requested training of the facility's QAPI program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program from NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A for CNA-TT, CNA-VV, CNA-WW, CNA-XX,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure all allegations involving potential abuse and/or neglect, and injury of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated for 4 (R10, R8, R14, R3 and R2) of 10 facility reported incidents reviewed involving residents. *On 7/14/25, R14 and R10 were involved in a member-to-member altercation that was not thoroughly investigated, and the facility did not conduct interviews of other members. *On 8/27/25, R8 and R14 were involved in a member-to-member altercation that was not thoroughly investigated. *On 7/10/25, allegation of abuse was submitted to the State Survey Agency involving R3. The facility did not conduct interviews of other members. *A thorough investigation was not completed for R2's injury of unknown injury. Findings Include: The facility's Prohibition and Prevention Member Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation effective 7/2/24 documents: .All incidents shall be investigated and reported to the appropriate agency as required by the agency.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure a resident's physician was notified for 2 (R1 & R11) of 11 residents reviewed. R1's physician was not notified when R1 was screaming out in pain with minimal movement on 8/22/25. The incident report dated 8/22/25 documents the provider notification to be done the next day. R11's physician was not notified when R11 eloped on 9/11/25. Findings include: 1.) R1's diagnoses includes chronic embolism and thrombosis of right popliteal vein (vein of the lower limb), atrial fibrillation (irregular and rapid heart beat), hypertension (high blood pressure), left above knee amputation, obsessive compulsive disorder (excessive thoughts that lead to repetitive behaviors), dementia (loss of cognitive function that interferes with a persons daily life & activities) and history of traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by outside force usually a violet blow to the head). R1's nurses note dated 8/22/25 at 13:58 (1:58 p.m.) written by Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not provide adequate evidence of a proper discharge for 1 of 3 residents (R6) reviewed for discharge and transfers.*The facility's physician did not document the specific needs for R6 that cannot be met at the facility, the facility's attempts to meet R6's needs, and the services available at the receiving facility to meet R6's needs for R6 to have an appropriate discharge.Findings:On 8/27/25, R6 was sent out to the hospital for a mental health evaluation from an appointment with R6's neurologist.At the time of R6's discharge, R6 was on the following medications per R6's Medication Administration Record:Risperidone 0.5mg two times per day and Duloxetine 60mg once per day.In a progress note dated 8/27/25 at 12:30 PM, Director of Social Services-D documented: This writer called member's guardian to inform them of the member to member that occurred today. This guardian presented as upset as evidenced by guardian raising their voice stating that this facility cannot discharge him as he is a veteran…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident (R14) with hearing impairment received proper treatment and assistive devices for 1 (R14) of 1 residents reviewed for assistive devices.Findings include:Surveyor requested a policy or procedure from the facility for residents requiring assistive devices for hearing, vision, and/or dental. Surveyor was notified that the facility had no policy or procedure for assistive devices.R14 was admitted the facility on 2/12/2020 with diagnoses of Dementia (progressive decline in thinking, communication, speech, and memory that interfere with daily life), Cognitive Communication Deficit (communication deficit from decline in memory, problem-solving, or attention), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (difficulty living day to day life due to experiencing a traumatic event), Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood (loss of interest in activities that were once enjoyable).R14's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 6/5/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 8) M2's care plan indicates that M2 requires total assist by two staff with sit to stand lift for transfers. Staff to buckle legs with strap and secure belt prior to transfer. The resident is non-weight bearing.M2's Kardex report documents, Transfer: the resident requires total assist by two staff with sit to stand lift for transfers. Staff to buckle legs with strap and secure belt prior to transfer.Neither document include the size sling that staff are to use while transferring M2.On 5/13/25, at 10:40 AM, Surveyor observed, CNA-P remove sit to stand mechanical lift from M2's room with a blue sling draped on top. When CNA-P was asked how she knows what sling size to use for M2, CNA-P stated she did not know what sling size M2 uses. CNA-P stated, normally, it is in care plan and based on size and weight, but CNA- P just uses the sling located on the sit to stand for two different residents because that is all the facility has.On 5/13/25, at 10:47 AM, Surveyor interviewed, CNA-Q who stated she has used the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R6) of 1 resident's resident representative was notified when there was a need to alter medical treatment. R6's POA (Power of Attorney) was not notified when R6 started Physical Therapy (PT) to work on R6's balance. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Orders Management with a last revision date of 5/17/2024 documents, in part: . The member or their healthcare representative will be notified of new orders and orders revised by provide/designee prior to initiation . 1.) R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Alzheimer's disease, Dementia with mood disturbance, Cancer, Repeated falls and Difficulty walking. R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents that R6 has long and short-term memory problems, is unable to recall faces, names, location, and season, and has severely impaired cognition with making decisions. R6 wears glasses. R6 requires supervision with walking and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Alzheimer's disease, Dementia with mood disturbance, Cancer and difficulty walking.R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documents that R6 has long and short-term memory problems, is unable to recall faces, names, location, and season, and has severely impaired cognition with making decisions. R6 wears glasses. R6 requires supervision with walking and transfers.R6 has an activated healthcare Power of Attorney (POA)-U.R6's [Activities of Daily Living] care plan initiated on 9/26/23 documents the following intervention: AM routine: Encourage R6 to wear glasses full time for distance and reading. Clean glasses when dirty (date initiated 9/18/24).On 3/25/25 at 8:51 AM, Surveyor interviewed R6's POA. POA-U stated that R6 has not has his correct eyeglasses for over a month. POA-U stated that R6's glasses were broken in February and R6 has been having to use an old pair of glasses which is not the correct prescription. POA-U…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not report 2 of 4 allegations of abuse or neglect to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) or State Survey Agency during the required timeframe. * R4 reported potential abuse to the charge nurse which was delayed in being reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the state agency. * Double briefing of residents was discovered and there was a delay in the issue being reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the state agency. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Prohibition and Prevention of Member Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed July 2024 documents (in part): Policy .: -All staff shall be expected to immediately report any, and all, observed or alleged abuse and other reportable incidents. -All incidents shall be investigated and reported to the appropriate agency as required by the agency. -Immediate intervention shall be initiated to maintain member safety with all observed or suspected allegations . -Corrective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated, staff member removed to prevent further incidence, or all staff education provided for 2 (R4 and R3) of 4 allegations of abuse or neglect reviewed.* R4 made an allegation of abuse that was not acted on by the staff member being removed from contact with residents or all staff education provided to prevent further abuse. *R3 had an injury of unknown origin that was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include:The Facility Policy titled Prohibition and Prevention of Member Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation last reviewed July 2024 documents (in part):Policy .:-All staff shall be expected to immediately report any, and all, observed or alleged abuse and other reportable incidents.-All incidents shall be investigated and reported to the appropriate agency as required by the agency.-Immediate intervention shall be initiated to maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for 1 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reviewed. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 62 residents who reside in the facility. CNA-M last had a performance review completed 11/14/23 for the performance period of 11/1/2022 to 10/31/2023. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Performance Evaluation Policy issued April 24, 2004, documents (in part): Introduction: It is the policy of the Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs that every supervisor will provide performance reviews for his or her staff as outlined in this policy. The performance review is conducted on a regular basis in order to . A performance review must be completed at least annually for all permanent employees . While reviewing a Facility Reported Incident pertaining to abuse, Surveyor requested the employee file for the named staff member (CNA-M). Surveyor discovered that the last performance evaluation in the file was for the performance period of 11/1/2022 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R25 and R38) of 2 injuries of unknown origin investigations that were reviewed were reported to the state agency. * On 11/8/24, R25 was discovered with a 15 cm by 6 cm bruise to left posterior axilla. The facility assumed it was from transferring R25 without a gait belt. This injury was not reported to the state agency. * On 10/15/24, R38 was discovered with a 7.5 cm by 4.4 cm bruise to the right upper arm. The facility assumed it was from R38 ambulating about the unit and hitting a walls and doorways. This injury was not reported to the state agency. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prohibition and Investigation policy dated last revision on June 2021 documents: Definition: Injury of unknown source-an injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following conditions are met: 1. The source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source of the injury could not be explained by the member and 2. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 (R25, R38 and R43) of 7 facility investigations involving potential abuse thoroughly investigated. * R25 was discovered with a 15 cm by 6 cm bruise to left posterior axilla. The facility assumed it was from transferring R25 without a gait belt. A thorough investigation into the bruise and its origin was not completed. * R38 was discovered with a 7.5 cm by 4.4 cm bruise to the right upper arm. The facility assumed it was from R38 ambulating about the unit and hitting a walls and doorways. A thorough investigation into the bruise and its origin was not completed. * On 12-30-24 the facility investigated an allegation of potential neglect of R43 by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-I. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of the reported incident. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prohibition and Investigation policy dated last revision on June 2021 documents: Definition: Injury of unknown source-an injury should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not refer all PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level I residents with a possible serious mental disorder on admission or with a significant change in status assessment to the referring agency to complete the PASRR Level II for 1 (R17) of 1 residents reviewed for PASRR completion. * R17 had a change in condition level 1 PASRR screen, which indicated R17 has a major mental disorder, which would trigger a level 2 PASRR to be completed. A level 2 PASRR was not completed for R17. Findings include: 1.) R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and dementia. R17's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R17 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating R17 has severe cognitive impairment. R17's Annual MDS documents that R17 has anxiety disorder, depression, and PTSD and receives antidepressant medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 2 (R10 and R40) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R10 was found to have MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) on 8/18/24 by an LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and there is no documentation that an RN (Registered Nurse) assessment was completed until 8/21/2024. No skin evaluation documentation was available for R10 between 8/18/24 and 8/21/24. * R40 had a care plan intervention in place to wear gripper socks due to a pressure injury to R40's heel. R40 was observed during the survey wearing shoes. Findings include: The Facility Policy titled Wound Prevention and Treatment Program last reviewed June 2021 documents (in part): Policy: -The wound prevention and treatment program shall include: Prompt assessment and treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R7) of 9 residents reviewed received adequate supervision, interventions to prevent accident hazards. * R7 did not have a Registered Nurse assessment status post a fall that caused a fracture of R7's left arm. Findings Include: The Facility's policy titled, [name of facility] Member Falls, with a last review date of 06/2021, documents in part, . After a Fall: 1) The Member is examined head to toe by an RN (Registered Nurse) before being moved, unless the Member is uncooperative, or needs to be moved because of danger in the environment. 1.) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that includes dementia. R7's Significant change Minimum Date Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 09, indicating R7 has moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also documents R7 has impairment on one side of lower extremity and uses cane/crutch and wheelchair for mobility purposes. R7's progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (R17) of 1 residents reviewed for weight loss. R17 sustained a 4.8% weight loss over a period of 7 days. The Physician was not consulted with, no assessment or evaluations were conducted. Findings include: R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses which include major depressive disorder, anxiety, hypothyroidism, and dysphagia. On R17's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/05/2024, documents R17 was assessed as having moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. R17's MDS indicates R17 has a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in 6 months. R17's MDS indicated R17 is on a mechanically altered diet and therapeutic diet. R17's care plan documents, R17 has a nutritional problem or a potential nutritional problem related to a past history of colon cancer, colectomy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 (R1, R8, R2, R7, and R6) of 7 facility reported incidents reviewed were reported to the State Agency or local law enforcement agency as required. -R1 and R8 had a resident to resident physical altercation on 2/22/2024. The facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement. -R1 and R2 has a resident to resident physical altercation on 7/14/2024. The facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement. -R7 did not have a 24 hour report submitted to the State Agency for an allegation of neglect on 2/21/2024. -R6 did not have a 24 hour report submitted to the State Agency for an allegation of suicidal/homicidal ideation on 3/20/2024. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Prohibition and Prevention of Member Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised on 4/25/2023, documents: . Purpose/ Overview: - To ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state statutes, rules, and regulations. - To protect the member's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 4 (R1, R8, R5, R6, and R7) of 7 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI's) reviewed. -R1 and R8 had a resident to resident physical altercation on [DATE]. The altercation was not thoroughly investigated. -On [DATE], R5 was verbally abused by a certified nursing assistant (CNA). The CNA continued to have access to vulnerable residents after the accusation and was not removed from resident care. -R6 had suicidal/ homicidal ideations of [DATE] that were not thoroughly investigated. -R7 had an accusation of neglect on [DATE] that was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Prohibition and Prevention of Member Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised on [DATE], documents: . Purpose/ Overview: - To ensure compliance with all applicable federal and state statutes, rules, and regulations. - To protect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that food was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature on 4 of 4 units. This has the potential to affect 66 of the 67 residents residing in the facility. *R10 informed Surveyor that food is ok but can be dry and cold at times. *One of one test trays had vegetables that were unpalatable. *Staff did not always complete and log food temperatures in the unit kitchens prior to serving food. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Temperature Monitoring of Food Served to Members, with a revision date of October 2021, documents: Applies to all staff who prepare food at Union Grove. Purpose/Overview: To provide safe and appetizing food to Members at appropriate and appealing temperatures. To comply with state and federal regulations regarding safe food handling. To provide means of monitoring food safety at time of service . Policy: Food items will be served to Members at [name of facility] at proper temperatures not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an injury of unknown source for 1 (R68) of 2 residents reviewed was reported to the State Agency within the required 24 hours. *R68 was found to have a bruise on the coccyx and upper right shoulder on 9/28/23. The facility did not report this injury of unknown source to the State Agency. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Prohibition and Prevention of member Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revised 4/25/23, states: Reporting: 1. On observation of actual or suspected abuse, or other reportable incident, staff immediately reports the event to the RN (Registered Nurse), nursing supervisor, or executive director (e.g. injury of unknown source .suspicious bruising, etc.). 1.2 Injuries of unknown source require the RN to assess the member's orientation and immediately ask the member, if alert and oriented x (times) 3, if they have knowledge of where the injury came from. If the member can identify the source, this is not an unknown source,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure incidents involving potential abuse or potential misappropriation were thoroughly investigated for 2 Residents (R371 and R68) of 9 Residents reviewed for potential abuse, neglect or misappropriation. *R371 reported their cell phone was missing. The facility self-reported this incident to the State Agency, however, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation. Staff that may have had access to R371's room were not interviewed. *R68 presented with bruises to the back and coccyx. The facility did not thoroughly investigate how these bruises occurred. Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Prohibition and Prevention of member abuse, neglect and exploitation, revised date of 4/25/23, documented, .All incidents shall be investigated and reported to the appropriate agency as required by the agency . 1.1 Treat each report of missing property with equal importance and make every effort to recover the missing property. 1.2 Injuries of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure resident's environment was free of accident hazards for 1 of 8 resident reviewed for falls. R67 has a history of falls and care planned fall prevention interventions (i.e. gripper socks) were not observed in place. Findings Include: The facility policy, entitled Member Falls, dated 6/2021, states, Purpose/Overview: to ensure that each Member is provided a safe environment .The MDS (Minimum Data Set) contains the questions usually found on fall risk assessment tools. Research has shown that all people over the age of 65 are at risk for falls. Being in a new environment, people with compromised health are at high risk for falls. Procedure: #4. During the Care Plan review, assess the success or failure of the intervention to limit the risk of falling for the Member if Member is at high risk. R67 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, type 2 diabetes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R20) of 1 residents reviewed received appropriate treatment and services related to catheter care. * R20 did not consistently receive catheter flushes in accordance with physician orders. Findings include: 1. R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with benign prostatic hypertrophy and obstructive uropathy. R20's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicates R20 has a foley catheter in place since 3/4/23. On 10/10/23, at 10:50 AM, Surveyor observed R20 in the facility's common area. Surveyor observed R20's catheter extension tubing revealed cloudy amber colored urine with trace amounts of dark sediment. On 10/11/23, at 8:10 AM, Surveyor observed R20 in the facility's common area. Surveyor observed R20's catheter extension tubing continued to reveal cloudy amber colored urine with trace amounts of dark sediment. On 10/12/23, at 9:30 AM, Surveyor observed R20 in facility's common area. Surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-09 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure there was a QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) meeting held at least quarterly with the required committee members in order to identify issues through the committee. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 64 residents currently in the facility. Findings include: On 01/09/2025, at 08:16 AM, Surveyor reviewed the facility's QAPI attendance sign in sheets provided by the Facility. On 01/09/2025, at 11:36 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B and Assistant Nursing Home Administrator (ANHA)-C regarding the QAPI Committee and documents provided. During interview Surveyor asked which months the Facility holds their Quarterly QAPI meetings. DON-B and ANHA-C were unable to tell Surveyor which months Quarterly QAPI meetings are held, based on provided QAPI documents. Surveyor noted Quarterly QAPI meeting minutes dated January 2024 for months October, November, December 2023. Surveyor was provided a document, titled Quarterly QI (Quality Improvement) Meeting Minutes April 2024. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$281,174 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
- $157,053 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
- $73,190 — penalty dated 2025-03-26
- $12,870 — penalty dated 2023-10-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-27 for 144 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-24 for 27 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STATE OF WISCONSIN | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/27/2006 |
| PARKER, JAMES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/22/2012 |
| SERVATIUS, TAMMY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/14/2025 |
| BEAUMONT, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/22/2025 |
| SIDHU, SARFRAZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525688. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.