Lindengrove Waukesha
425 N University Dr, Waukesha, WI 53188 · Non profit - Corporation · 61 certified beds · (262) 524-6400 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $204,321 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-25)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 7.9% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.0% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 5.7% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.0% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.2% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.6% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.5% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.3% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 29.0% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.77 | 1.66 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 7.93 | 2.29 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.1%CMS range 33.8–50.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 9.5–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 22.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.6%CMS range 5.8–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 56.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 (R13, R2, R8, and R19) of 6 residents reviewed for falls. * R13 experienced 2 falls on 7/18/25 and was sent to the emergency room. R13 was diagnosed with blunt head trauma, forehead laceration requiring sutures, and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding on the brain). When R13 returned to the facility, R13 fell an additional 8 times between 7/18/25 through 9/7/25. Two of these falls resulted in R13 hitting his head again and required steri-strips to close the wounds. The 10 falls that R13 experienced at the facility were not thoroughly investigated and did not determine a root cause for R13's falls. A resident-specific care plan intervention was not always put in place after a fall, and previous interventions were not always documented if they were in place at the time of the fall. R13's fall care plan interventions were observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 1 (R8) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R8 admitted to the facility with pressure injuries (PIs) on her left heel and right lateral foot which later resolved. R8 was assessed as high risk for PIs. Despite being at high risk, R8's physician's order for an air mattress was not implemented, a care plan for actual skin impairment was not initiated timely, and her weekly skin assessments were not completed weekly as per facility policy. R8 developed pressure injuries to her right lower extremity that deteriorated to a stage 3 and a stage 4 with necrosis and muscle/fascia visible in addition to developing two stage 2 PIs to her buttocks. R8's care plan was never revised with interventions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives and three of three residents (Resident (R) 1, R9, and R10) reviewed for transfer requirements out of a sample of 10 were provided with written notification of the facility's bed hold policy prior to transfer to the hospital. The facility also failed to submit documentation of the facility discharge notices to representatives of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. By not ensuring information regarding the bed hold process is explained to residents and/or representatives could create distress or confusion related to readmission to the facility due to the facility-initiated discharge.Findings include:1.Review of R1's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and the date of discharge to the hospital was [DATE].Review of R1's discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 6 (R3, R4, R1, R8, R19, and R47) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalizations received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and name and address (including mail and email) with the telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, were notified of the reason for transfer/discharge & bed hold policy in writing to the resident & their representative and the rate to reserve the residents bed. *R3 was transferred to the hospital on 4/3/25 and 5/20/25. A transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R3 and/or R3's representative. *R4 was transferred to the hospital on 7/16/25 and 8/11/25. A transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R4 and/ or R4's representative. *R1 was transferred to the hospital on 3/15/25. A transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R1 and/ or R1's representative. *R8 was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all facility staff received required effective communication program training for 1 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs).This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents who reside at the facility on the wing where CNA-W is working and have the potential to receive care from CNA-W. Findings Include:On 09/25/24, at 11:00 AM, Surveyor reviewed CNA-W's completed trainings for the past year and noted there was no documentation that CNA-W received training on the facility's effective communication program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's effective communication program. On 9/25/24, at 12:01 PM, Surveyor requested missing documentation from NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A for CNA-W's training of the facility's effective communication program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's effective communication program. Surveyor was informed by NHA-A to call Learning Facilitator (LF)-X. NHA-A informed Surveyor that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all facility staff received required Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program training for 1 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs).This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents who reside at the facility on the wing where CNA-W is working and have the potential to receive care from CNA-W. Findings Include:On 09/25/24, at 11:00 AM, Surveyor reviewed CNA-W's completed trainings for the past year and noted there was no documentation that CNA-W received training on the facility's QAPI program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program. On 9/25/24, at 12:01 PM, Surveyor requested missing documentation from NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A for CNA-W's training of the facility's QAPI program which outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program. Surveyor was informed by NHA-A to call Learning Facilitator (LF)-X. NHA-A informed Surveyor that LF-X tracks and records the education for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all facility staff received required compliance and ethics program training for 1 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs).This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents who reside at the facility on the wing where CNA-W is working and have the potential to receive care from CNA-W. Findings Include:On 09/25/24, at 11:00 AM, Surveyor reviewed CNA-W's completed trainings for the past year and noted there was no documentation that CNA-W received training of the facility's compliance and ethics program.On 9/25/24, at 12:01 PM, Surveyor requested missing documentation from NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A for CNA-W's training of the facility's compliance and ethics program. Surveyor was informed by NHA-A to call Learning Facilitator (LF)-X. NHA-A informed Surveyor that LF-X tracks and records the education for all the facility's staff.On 9/25/24, at 12:24 PM, Surveyor conducted a phone interviewed with LF-X about CNA-W's training of the facility's compliance and ethics program. LF-X informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interviews, the facility did not inform the resident or the resident's guardian of a psychoactive medication that required informed consent for administration for 1(R43) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.R43 received the antipsychotic medication Seroquel and the antidepressant medication Zoloft without receiving consent from R43's guardian.Findings include:R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Dementia and Major Depressive Disorder.R43 has an activated Power of Attorney/Guardian.R43's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documents that R43 received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications daily during the assessment reference period.A review of the current physician orders for R43 document the following:Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel) 25 MG (milligram), give 0.5 tablet by mouth at bedtime. This order was active starting 6/5/25.Sertraline 50 MG, give by mouth in the morning related to Major Depressive Disorder. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 (R8 and R30) of 2 residents with allegations of abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency within the required reporting timeframe. *On 7/3/25, R8's Activated Power of Attorney (APOA) notified Director of Nursing (DON)-B that R8's wallet was missing. The facility started an investigated on 7/3/25 and submitted an initial report to the State Agency on 7/3/25, at 3:57 PM. The facility did not submit a 5-day report to the State Agency as required. *R30 informed Surveyor that a facility staff member, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F, yelled at R30 and made R30 scared. R30 had informed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-E of the interaction between R30 and CNA-F. R30 stated that CNA-E informed R30 that CNA-E would file a complaint. CNA-E did not file a complaint and did not inform Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)-D, Director of Nursing (DON)-B or Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A of R30's concern. On 9/8/25, Surveyor informed NHA-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 (R2 and R13) of 15 residents reviewed R2 and R13 did not have comprehensive behavior care plans based on their comprehensive assessments for behavior management including targeted behaviors and non-pharmalogical approaches for behavior management. Findings include: 1.) R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anxiety and Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance. R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 exhibited rejection of care 1-3 days over the last week of the reference period. On 9/10/25, R2's current physicians orders were reviewed and documented: Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) twice a day with a start date of 2/6/25 for dementia with behavioral disturbance. Seroquel is an anti-psychotic medication. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not complete neurological checks in accordance with facility protocol and standards of practice for 2 (R2 and R13) of 4 residents reviewed for unwitnessed falls.*R2 sustained unwitnessed falls on 1/31/25, 2/2/25, 2/3/25, 5/16/25 and 7/1/25. Facility staff did not document neurological checks as completed per the facility protocol and standards of practice.*R13 sustained unwitnessed falls on 9/2/25 and 9/7/25. Facility staff did not document that neurological checks were completed per the facility protocol and standards of practice.Findings include:On 9/15/25 at 8:59 AM, Consultant-G informed Surveyor that the facility does not have a neurological check policy.The American Association of Post-Acute Care Nursing document dated August of 2021 and titled, Post Fall Assessments documents, in part: . An assessment of neurological status, often called a neuro check, should be done when a resident hits his or her head or if it is unknown if they hit their head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and does not develop pressure injuries unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure injuries receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new injuries from developing for 1 of 6 (R50) residents reviewed for pressure injuries.R50's pressure injury was not comprehensively assessed upon admission. The pressure injury was assessed by the wound physician 6 days later and documented as an unstageable DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) with moderate serosanguinous exudate. Findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity reviewed 5/8/25, documents (in part) . Prevention measures are put in place to reduce the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the drug regimen of each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist, and that irregularities identified by the pharmacist were reviewed, and action was taken to address them, for 3 (R1, R2, R43) of 5 residents reviewed. *R1 had pharmacist reviews dated 7/3/25, 8/7/25, and 9/3/25 with recommendations for a tardive dyskinesia assessment to be completed as R1 is on antipsychotic medication. The pharmacy recommendations were not followed up on. *R2's pharmacy reviews for 6/25, 7/25, 8/25, and 9/25 indicated that a screening for tardive dyskinesia assessment was needed to be completed due to Seroquel administration. The pharmacy recommendations were not followed up on. *The Pharmacist monthly review for R43 recommended the facility conduct an AIMS Assessment. The facility did not act upon this recommendation although R43 continued to take Antipsychotic medication. On 8/7/25, the Pharmacy Review again questioned why the AIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure its medication error rate is not 5 percent or greater. The medication error rate was 11.54%.Findings include:The facility policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines dated May 2018 documents (in part):Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. The facility has sufficient staff and a medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of medications without unnecessary interruptions.7). Tablet crushing/capsule opening: Crushing tablets may require a physician's order, per facility policy. If it is safe to do so, medication tablets may be crushed or capsules emptied out when a resident has difficulty swallowing or is tube-fed, using the following guidelines:c. Orders to crush medications should not be applied to medications which, if crushed, present a risk to the resident. For example:1. Long-acting or enteric-coated dosage forms should not be crushed; an alternative should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospice collaboration and communication was established to ensure continuity of care between hospice provider and the facility for 1 (R13) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services. *R13 started receiving hospice care and treatment on 7/29/25. R13's hospice plan of care initiated on 7/29/25, included Lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) and Hydromorphone (a narcotic pain medication) to be ordered and implemented by facility staff. Facility staff did not enter the physician order for Lorazepam until 9/6/25 and Hydromorphone until 9/15/25. R13 sustained falls on 8/2/25, 8/9/25, 8/18/25 and 9/2/25. Facility staff did not inform hospice staff of these falls on the day the falls happened. According to hospice and facility staff, R13 is to have a hospice binder at the nurse's station to aid in communication between the facility and the hospice provider. R13 was observed to not have a hospice binder.Findings include:The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe medication orders to ensure correct administration of prednisone (oral steroid) and failed to notify the provider of elevated blood glucose levels for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for blood sugars out of 10 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in withdrawal symptoms from not tapering the prednisone and in adverse health effects from not managing elevated blood glucose levels. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, revised 12/19, revealed Medications are administered as prescribed . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Standard Diabetes Mellitus Protocol revealed . 2) blood sugars to be within parameters as determined by the physician orders 3) exhibit no hypo/hyperglycemic episodes . update physician and responsible party as needed . Review of R2's admission Record located in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain wound treatment orders timely when a pressure injury was identified for two of three residents (Resident (R) 4 and R1) reviewed for pressure injury out of 10 sample residents. This had the potential for residents' pressure injuries to decline. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity, dated 02/08/17, revealed: The care and intervention for any skin breakdown or wound is intended to prevent any further advancement of the wound or additional skin breakdown. 1. There will be collaboration with the interdisciplinary team [IDT] regarding the presence of breakdown and the intervention plan . Upon identification of abnormal skin findings, a licensed nurse will complete a skin assessment. Individual with abnormal skin concern(s) will be added to weekly wound rounds. Registered Nurse [RN] or designee will: i. conduct weekly skin evaluation, ii.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have medications available to administer as ordered for two of four residents (Resident (R) 9 and R2) reviewed for medication availability out of 10 sample residents. This had the potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, revised 12/19, revealed: If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, not available, or given at a time other than the scheduled time (e.g., the resident is not in the facility at scheduled dose time, or a starter dose of antibiotic is needed), .If electronic MAR [Medication Administration Record] is used, documentation of the unadministered dose is done as instructed by the procedures for use of the eMAR [electronic MAR] system . If [XX consecutive doses] of a vital medication are withheld, refused, or not available, the physician is notified. Nursing documents the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not follow proper sanitation and food handling practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen and 1 of 2 serving areas with the potential to affect 44 residents. * Garbage cans in the kitchen were observed to be very soiled and a lid was not on a garbage can next to a food preparation area. * Multiple items in the kitchen were found to be undated and several were uncovered. * The handwashing sink in the kitchen was very dirty. * The serving area on the second floor was found to have a mop and bucket with dirty water next to a cart for food trays. * Several food storage bins were observed to have the scoop stored inside the bin in direct contact with the product. Findings Include: On 5/28/24 at 8:48 AM the following was observed in the kitchen: * In a refrigerator in the food preparation area was a chef salad and 3 packs of partially used cold cuts without a date. * In the walk in Refrigerator was a large container of partially used fruit salad with no date, a pan of red and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents have reasonable access to the use of telephone, in a place where calls can be made without being overheard. The facility provided telephones in resident's rooms on the first floor while resident's living on the second floor of the facility did not have reasonable access to the use of telephone. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 28 of 28 residents residing on the second floor of the facility who could request the use of telephone. Findings include: During Resident Council held on 5/29/24 at 2:00 PM, R14 stated, I am upset that there are not phones in the rooms on the second floor. R14 stated that they were told by the facility that the budget would be reviewed in July and a plan for phones would be addressed at that time. R14 stated that there was a phone at the end of the hallway on the second floor that residents could use but that it did not provide privacy. On 5/30/24 at 10:22 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A regarding the phone system at the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure information was provided and consent was obtained for a resident who was prescribed psychotropic medications for 1 (R37) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R37 was prescribed Mirtazapine and Trazadone which are antidepressant medications. The facility did not obtain written consent from R37's Power of Attorney (POA) for these medications. Findings include: The undated facility policy, entitled Standard Psychoactive Medication Protocol, documents, in part: Nursing: . Review and obtain signature for informed consents with individual or responsible party . R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses that include: Stroke, Aphasia (loss of ability to speak), Lung cancer, and Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. R37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/22/2024 indicates that R37 is rarely/never understood and R37 is severely cognitively impaired. Surveyor reviewed R37's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate and safe administration of medication for 1 (R34) of 5 Residents observed for medication pass. R34 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment or a physician's order to self-administer medication. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled, Self-Administration of Medications Effective Date: May 2018, states in part: Policy In order to maintain the residents' highest level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. Procedures A. If the resident desires to self-administer medications, an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive (including orientation to time), physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility during the care planning process . C. For those residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not notify a resident's representative or attending physician when there was a change of condition involving 1 (R45) of 14 residents in the sample. R45 had a fall with injury and was transported to the hospital. There was no documentation R45's representative or attending physician were updated when the change of condition occurred. Findings include: R45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, muscle weakness (generalized), dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit. R45 has an activated power of attorney. The Medicare 5 day MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/19/2024 indicates R45 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R45 is frequently incontinent of urine and bowel.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a safe, home-like environment that provided reasonable care for the protection of a resident's property from loss for 1 (R33) of 1 residents reviewed. Two of R33's shirts were lost after R33 sent them to be cleaned by the facilities laundry department. R33 informed the facility. The facility started the process of locating the missing the shirts but did not follow through with locating them in a timely manner. Findings include: R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses that include Depression, Anxiety, Chronic Kidney disease, and Muscle weakness. R33's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/8/2024, indicated that R33 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R33 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. On 5/28/24, at 1:59 PM, Surveyor interviewed R33. R33 stated that the facility does her laundry. R33 stated that about 4 months ago, 2 of her shirts went missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure information from the baseline care plan was reviewed with resident and a copy or summary of the plan was provided to the resident for one (R10) of one residents reviewed. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, with a review date of 8/10/2023, documents, in part: . Within 48 hours after admission: a Baseline Care Plan will be completed and reviewed with Individual and/or Individual Representative. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has pertinent diagnoses that include Chronic heart failure, Weakness, Unsteadiness on feet and Chronic kidney disease. R10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/16/2024 indicated that R10 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R10 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. On 5/28/24, at 10:41 AM, Surveyor interviewed R10, who stated that R10 had not participated in the baseline care planning process.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (R100) of 12 residents to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Findings include: R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, muscle weakness and urinary incontinence. On 5/30/24 R100's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was reviewed and indicated R100 was at risk for pressure injuries and a Care Area Assessment (CAA) for Pressure Injury was triggered and documented: Will pressure injury be addressed on the care plan and yes is checked. R100's narrative for this CAA documented: CAA triggered for potential pressure injury due to need for assistance with bed mobility. Further complicated by sometimes incontinent of bowel and bladder and utilizes brief daily to manage. (R100) is at risk for skin breakdown. On 5/30/24 R100's Braden Scale for Predicting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide the necessary ADL (Activity of Daily Living) services for 2 (R8 and R31) of 14 residents that were dependent on staff to assist with ADL care. * R8 was observed to have long, dirty fingernails on both hands and was itching an open wound. * R31 was observed to have right and left hand contractures, R31's nails on both hands were long and dirty and had the potential of cutting into R31's palms. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Standard ADL Protocol, that is not dated states: ADLs: . personal hygiene (oral care, face, hands) . PROBLEM: Individual requires assistance with ADLs . CNA (certified nursing assistant) . Trim finger and toenails on bath/shower day and as needed unless diabetic. RN (registered nurse) . Complete diabetic nail care. LPN (licensed practical nurse) . Complete diabetic nail care. 1.) R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include (idiopathic) normal pressure hydrocephalus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide an ongoing, individualized and meaningful activities program designed to meet the residents interest and support their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 2 (R247 and R33) of 2 residents reviewed for activities. R247 and R33 reported that they would like to participate in organized group activities on the weekend but activities are not offered on the weekends. Findings include: R247 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after surgery to repair a broken femur. R247's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/2024 indicated that R247 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that R33 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. Section F of the MDS documented that it is very important to R247 to do things with groups of people. On 5/28/2024, at 12/14 PM, Surveyor interviewed R247 about the facility's activity program. R47 stated that he enjoys joining the activities that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R6) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents had adequate assistance devices and interventions in place to prevent accidents. * R6 did not have a falls care plan initiated until 12/4/2023 even though R6 was admitted to the facility because of a fall at R6's previous residence and assessed at a high risk for falls. Findings include: R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include age related osteoporosis, neuropathy, low back pain, spinal stenosis, cervical and lumbar region, glaucoma, atherosclerotic heart disease, bradycardia, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R6's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R6 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 and the facility assessed R6 needing supervision with all activities of daily living (ADLs) and when walking 50 feet and performing turns. R6's fall risk evaluation assessed on 10/17/2023 indicated R6 was at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R31) of 2 reviewed for an indwelling catheter had a valid medical justification for continued use of the indwelling catheter, received necessary services for monitoring of the indwelling catheter and provide dignity for resident who had an indwelling catheter. R31 was admitted to the facility with a foley catheter. There was no diagnosis or justification for the catheter, no size indicated, and no orders for monitoring or cares for the indwelling catheter. Observations were made of catheter bag not being in a privacy bag. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled STANDARD INDWELLING CATHETER PROTOCOL, no date indicated, states: Problem: Individual has Indwelling Catheter, . RN/LPN (registered nurse/ licensed practical nurse): Obtain order for indwelling catheter, Document type, size, balloon inflation size and indication for use . , Urinary assessment and documentation as indicated and directed by the RN, Change catheter/ bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure the necessary care and services to provide respiratory care were consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R31) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. R31's oxygen tubing was not labeled, there was no care plan for respiratory/ oxygen use, and no orders in place for care of oxygen supplies. Findings include: The Facility policy, entitled STANDARD RESPIRATORY PROTOCOL, no date indicated, states: Problem: Impaired or potential impairment of gas exchange r/t (related to) chronic respiratory disease. RN (registered nurse): Assess for signs of ineffective breathing pattern PRN (as needed), Monitor/Document respiratory status PRN, ., Protective covering to oxygen tubing, around ears, Replace DME (durable medical equipment) as ordered. MAA (medication administration assistant): . Replace DME as ordered, All: . Involve individual and/or responsible party in care plan process. R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate and safe administration of medication for 2 (R7 and R34) of 5 Residents observed for medication pass. R7 and R34 were not provided medications that were on the physician orders due to not having on medication cart yet were signed out as given on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines Effective Date: May 2018, states in part: Procedures A. Preparation . 11) If a medication with a current, active order cannot be located in the medication cart/drawer, other areas of the medication cart, medication room, and facility (e.g., other units) are searched, if possible. If the medication cannot be located after further investigation, the pharmacy is contacted, or medication removed from the night box/emergency kit . D. Documentation . 6) If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, not available, or given at a time other than the scheduled time .if electronic MAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include age-related osteoporosis, neuropathy, low back pain, spinal stenosis- cervical region and lumbar region, glaucoma, bradycardia, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R6's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R6 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, PHQ-9 (patient health questionnaire-9- screening/diagnosing/monitoring/and measuring the severity of depression) score of 0 indicating no depressive symptoms, and R6 did not have any behaviors. Surveyor reviewed R6's medical record and noted an order for: 1. Duloxetine HCl oral capsule, Delayed release particles 40 MG (Duloxetine HCl)- Give 40 mg by mouth in the morning for depression (Start: 3/27/2024) 2. Anti-depressant medication use- observe resident closely for significant side effects: sedation, drowsiness, dry mouth, blurred vision, urinary retention, tachycardia, muscle tremor, agitation, headache, skin rash,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for 3 residents (R7, R35 and R100) of 5 residents observed receiving medications. The facility medication error rate was 11.11%. *R7 did not have Voltaren Gel applied per order and the gel was signed out on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). *R34 did not receive Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet which was signed out on the MAR. *R100 did not receive Amlodipine 10mg tablet which was signed out on the MAR. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines Effective Date: May 2018, states in part: Procedures A. Preparation . 11) If a medication with a current, active order cannot be located in the medication cart/drawer, other areas of the medication cart, medication room, and facility (e.g., other units) are searched, if possible. If the medication cannot be located after further investigation, the pharmacy is contacted, or medication removed from the night box/emergency kit . D. Documentation . 6) If a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R100) was free of significant medication errors. * R100 had an order for Vancomycin every 3 days transcribed twice so she received double the ordered dose from 4/12/24 to 5/28/24 when it was brought to the facility's attention. Findings include: R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included status post right knee surgery for a right knee tear. On 5/28/24 R100's current Physician's orders were reviewed and included Vancomycin 125 milligrams (MG) for infection (right knee) every 3 days started on admission with the first dose on 3/12/24. R100 also had another order for Vancomycin 125 MG for right knee effusion every 3 days started on admission which was 4/12/24 and discontinued 5/28/24. On 5/28/24 R100's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April and May 2024 were reviewed and documented that R100 received 16 extra doses of Vancomycin 125 MG in the timeframe from 4/12/24 to 5/27/24. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and did not ensure expired medications were removed from medication carts. This occurred for 3 of 5 medication carts/storage rooms observed. The refrigerators in the 1st and 2nd floor medication storage rooms did not have monitoring of temperatures recorded R9's Insulin Glargine was stored in the medication cart beyond use by date Findings include: 1.) The Facility Policy and Procedure titled, Medication Storage in the Facility Effective Date: May 2018, states in part: Procedures . K. Refrigerated medications are kept in closed and labeled containers, with internal and external medications separated . L. All medications are maintained within the temperature ranges noted in the United States Pharmacopeia . 3) Refrigerated 36 degrees to 46 degrees Fahrenheit with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring . Temperature . C. Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R)8) of 11 residents reviewed for code status was accurately documented throughout the medical record. This had the potential for the resident and/or responsible party's wishes not to be honored. Findings include: Review of R8's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under hospice care. R8 was noted to be a Full Code status. Review of R8's Plan of Care (POC) located in the Plan of Care tab in the EMR revealed R8 had a terminal prognosis and was under hospice care. R8's living will was to be reviewed and ensured it was followed, family is to be involved in the discussion. Review of the hospice form provided by the Administrator revealed R8 had been a Do not Resuscitate (DNR) since 10/02/22. During an interview on 03/25/24 at 1:38 PM with Family Member (FM) of R8 revealed they were walking into R8's room and found him nonresponsive, without a pulse and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was admitted without a pressure injury was properly assessed and monitored to prevent the development of a pressure injury for one resident (Resident (R) 5) out of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. This resulted in the development of a facility acquired, stage 3 pressure injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury-Prevention and Managing Skin Integrity dated 08/10/2023 indicated, 3. Skin Checks: a. Skin checks will be done upon admission, readmission or as clinically indicated. b. While providing routine care, a licensed nurse is to monitor the skin condition of each individual weekly and document the Skin Check in the medical record. Review of the R5's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a fall for one (Resident (R) 5) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. This had the potential for additional falls and potential injuries to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls dated 06/13/23, indicated 2. Procedure of Fall Event and Implementation of Intervention: a. Licensed nurse completes electronic documentation of the Fall Incident Report. B. The Care Plan will be updated with an identified intervention .3. Administrative Review a. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will review Fall Incident report and utilize root cause analysis to make further recommendations. Review of the R5's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. Review of R5's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a timely manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for incontinence care. The failure of the facility to check and change the resident after an incontinent episode put the resident at risk for developing skin issues and potentially an urinary tract infection (UTI). Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Standard ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Protocol revealed, ADL's: Dressing, grooming, eating, toileting, bathing and personal hygiene. Problem: Individual requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA): Toileting every 2 to 3 hours or per individual preference .Provide incontinence care as needed. Review of R3's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of right hemiplegia (paralysis),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for one resident (Resident (R) 3) of one observed during from a sample of 11 residents. This had the potential for infection control not being maintained. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene dated 09/20/23, revealed, The organization will promote clean hands as the single most important factor in preventing the spread of pathogens, antibiotic resistance, and incidence of infections. Specific indications for hand hygiene .3. Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient . 6. Immediately after glove removal. Review of R3's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of right hemiplegia (paralysis), Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Review of R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure staff followed transmission- based precautions for 1 (R2) of 1 residents who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. This practice has the possibility to affect 19 residents residing on in the facility. Surveyor observed CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) G assist a SARS-CoV-2 positive resident (R2) in their room without donning an N95 mask. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control's Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated on September 23 2022, documents: HCP (HealthCare Personnel) who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should adhere to Standard Precautions and use a NIOSH-approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (i.e., goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face). On 02/09/23 at 7:47 AM, NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) A informed Surveyor an employee tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 yesterday. NHA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not immediately inform the resident's physician and Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAH) of a significant change in the resident's status for 1 (R4) of 8 residents reviewed for a change in condition notification. * R4 had a documented 17 pound weight gain in 7 days which could indicate an underlying health concern and R4's physician and his POAH were not notified. Findings include: On 2/9/23 the facility policy and procedure titled Weighing Individuals dated 6/24/22 was reviewed and read: Weights are reviewed with previous weights for any changes. The provider is updated with weights as indicated. On 2/9/23 the facility policy and procedure titled Change of Condition and Provider Notification dated 7/13/21 was reviewed and read: Change of condition is a deviation from and individuals baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral or functional status. Clinically important means a deviation that, without intervention, may result in complications or death.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed for 1 (R12) of 8 Residents. R12 did not have problem areas of psychotropic medication and nutritional status identified on R12's care plans. Findings include: On 12/5/22, R12 admitted to the Facility with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, Unspecified; Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; Adult Failure to Thrive and Diabetes Mellitus, Type II. R12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/22, documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating R12 has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicates R12 requires extensive assistance of one (1) staff member for dressing, toileting, transferring, ambulating and hygiene tasks. The MDS also documents R12 weighs 173 pounds and has had a 5% weight loss in the last month or has had a 10% or more weight loss in the last 6 months while not being on a physician prescribed weight-loss regime. The MDS also documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure 2 (R4, R12) of 2 Residents with significant weight changes received the necessary care and treatment. * On 1/30/23 R4 weighed 166 pounds and on 2/6/23 R4 weighed 183 (a 17 pound weight gain in 7 days) no intervention was taken by the facility after the weight gain. R4 was not weighed per the facility policy which indicated R4 should have been weighed on admission and every week for 4 weeks. R4's admission assessment did not include a weight and the section was left blank. *On 1/9/23, R12 weighed 177.4 pounds and on 1/16/23, R12 weighed 147.2 pounds (a 30.2 pound weight loss in 7 days); no intervention was taken by the facility after the weight loss. Findings include: On 2/9/23 the facility policy and procedure titled Weighing Individuals dated 6/24/22 was reviewed and read: Weights are obtained per order or on admission, weekly for the first 4 weeks after admission or readmission. Weights are reviewed with previous weights for any changes. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility did not ensure psychotropic medications were adequately monitored for indications for use. This was observed with 1 (R12) of 2 residents reviewed on psychotropic medications. R12 was admitted to the facility on antipsychotic and antidepressant medication without behavioral indications for use nor behavioral monitoring. Findings include: The Facility's Standard Psychoactive Medication Protocol, with no date: PROBLEM: Individual is prescribed a psychotropic medication. GOAL: Individual will have minimized side effects of psychotropic drug use. MAA: -document target behaviors and report changes to Licensed Nurse. Nursing: - . Document target behaviors, interventions and effectiveness. R12 is over [AGE] years of age and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, Unspecified; Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; Adult Failure to Thrive and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure they posted the nurse staffing data to include the date, resident census, and the total actual hours worked by Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Certified Nurses Aides, on a daily basis. This has the capability to affect all 44 residents which is the total census upon survey entrance. Findings include: On 6/3/2024, at 9:44 AM, Surveyor noted the nursing postings located in a cabinet in the facility's main entrance hallway and the posting was dated for 5/30/2024. On 6/3/2024, at 10:40 AM, Surveyor shared observation with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A that the nursing posting is from 5/30/2024 and that surveyor was trying to locate scheduler-R. NHA-A noted Surveyors concern and will locate scheduler-R. On 6/3/2024, at 1:24 PM, Surveyor interviewed scheduler- R who stated typically, schedules are printed out for the weekend and left for the manager on duty (MOD). Scheduler-R was not sure who placed the daily postings on weekends or when scheduler-R is not at the facility. Surveyor shared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$204,321 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $164,700 — penalty dated 2025-09-25
- $39,621 — penalty dated 2024-06-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARQUARDT VILLAGE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/07/2023 |
| FISCHER, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| DETTMAN, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| HEROUX, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| KOHLHOFF, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| KONKOL, DENNIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| MEIDENBAUER, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| VAN DER LINDEN, KATIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/07/2023 |
| WAGNER, LYNNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| MARKS, JULIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/05/2025 |
| MAUTHE, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2023 |
| ILLUMINUS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2023 |
| LEMBKE, ADAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2023 |
| SIDHU, SARFRAZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525422. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.