Lutheran Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 242 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 127.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, policy review and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents (R)1 and R3), of ten sampled residents were free of accidents. Specifically, R1 fell to the floor while unsupervised and sustained a fracture requiring surgical intervention, and R3 fell to the floor while unsupervised which resulted in a head laceration requiring medical treatment. In addition, both R1 and R3 were not provided individual interventions on their care plans to prevent the falls from occurring. The failure to provide adequate supervision and individual fall risk interventions placed R1 and R3 at risk for falls with injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls with a revision date 05/17/23 indicated Residents have the right to be mobile and free from physical restraints with minimal risk for injury. The goal is to reduce falls as much as possible, and to reduce the risk of serious injury . all residents will be assessed for their fall risk upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  3.) On 2/11/25, the nurses note indicates R54 was experiencing a change in condition and was sent to the hospital. The nurses note on 2/11/25 indicates R54 was being admitted to the facility due to influenza and needing dialysis. On 6/9/25 at 3:10 p.m., during the daily exit meeting with NHA(Nursing Home Administrator)-A and DON (Director of Nursing)-B, Surveyor asked for a copy of the transfer and bedhold notice given to R54 for the 2/11/25 hospitalization. On 6/10/25 Surveyor received the transfer and bedhold notice dated 2/12/25 for R54. The transfer and bedhold notice does not include email address for state agency and facility and does not include information regarding the Ombudsman and how to contact the ombudsman. On 6/10/25 at 10:45 a.m. Surveyor interviewed NHA-A. NHA-A stated she understood the concern and had no additional information. Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide the required documentation with resident transfers to the hospital. This was observed with 4 (R22, R86, R54, and R77) of 5 resident hospitalization reviews. * R22, R86, R54,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure each resident receives, and the facility provides food prepared by methods that conserve nutritional value, flavor, and appearance. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 8 residents receiving a puree diet. The recipe for preparing pureed diet was not followed to ensure puree food is prepared by methods that conserve nutritional value, flavor and appearance. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled General Food Preparation reviewed 6/2025 documents (in part) . . Policy Statement: All food must be prepared in a manner that maintains its safety, quality, and nutritional value. Proper food handling techniques must be followed at all times to prevent forborne illness and ensure resident satisfaction. 3. Special Diets and Resident Needs: Follow individualized dietary plans as ordered by the registered dietician or physician. Ensure consistency-modified diets (e.g., pureed, mechanical soft) are prepared correctly to reduce the risk of choking. 1.) On 6/5/25 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 3 resident unit refrigerators in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 46 residents residing on the affected unit. Residents' food stored in the refrigerator was not labeled and/or dated. The refrigerator temperature was not within the recommended temperature for safe food storage. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage-Resident reviewed 1/29/24 documents (in part) . Policy statement: All perishable food items brought in by family and visitors must be refrigerated and labeled. 1.0 Perishable food brought in by family or visitors will be labeled by nursing staff and refrigerated. 2.0 Labels will state residents name, date received/opened and discard date. 3.0 A food chart is maintained on each refrigerator indicating the discard date for each food item. Any questions regarding discard dates should be directed to Dining and Hospitality. 4.0…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection and control program designed to provide safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 4 (R87, R12, R77 and R528) of 26 residents reviewed for Infection Control practices. * Surveyor observed Wound Medical Doctor (MD)-O, Nurse Manager-J, and Wound tech-P perform wound care for R87 without wearing proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). *Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-K provide bowel incontinence care for R87 and did not change gloves and wash hands prior to performing peri care/catheter care. *Surveyor observed Advanced Practice Nurse Practitioner (APNP)- Q assess R87's right lower leg wound without proper PPE. *Surveyor observed Wound MD-O not wearing a glove while performing wound debridement for R12's wound care. *Surveyor observed PPE not worn while providing incontinence cares for R12. *PPE not used for R528…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide a comprehensive care plan for 1 (R96) of 5 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. R96 is incontinent of bowel and bladder and did not have a comprehensive care plan for incontinence. Findings include: 1.) R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, and Dysuria (pain with urination) On 6/5/25, R96's Annual Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was reviewed and indicated R96 was frequently incontinent of bladder. R96's brief interview for mental status on this assessment documented a score of 13 (cognitively intact). R96's MDS triggered for urinary incontinence and was selected to continue to care plan. R96's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for urinary incontinence dated 3/24/25 triggered and documented resident needing assistance with toileting including transfers, clothing adjustment and toileting hygiene. Resident is frequently incontinent of bladder. Staff provides…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R77, R87) of 26 residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) cares, received the necessary services for cares. *R77 did not receive nail care per care plan, policy and resident's preference. *R87 did not receive scheduled shower per care plan and resident's preference. Findings include: The Facilities Policy titled, Standards of Care at Lutheran Home. Revised 6/1/2023. Documents: Policy Statement: Lutheran Home will provide routine interventions for all residents. These interventions do not to be addressed on the resident's individual care plan or care card. If the standard is different for a resident, the individual plan of care will reflect the variance. Standards: . Resident will receive a weekly shower or bath. Regular nail care provided as needed. 1) R77 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, polyneuropathy, difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote hearling, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 (R112 and R20) of 7 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. * R112 was transferred to the hospital with a pressure injury. Upon readmission, R112's pressure injury was not comprehensively assessed until 3 days later. R112 did not have a comprehensive plan of care related to a comprehensive assessment. *R20 developed a pressure injury in the facility that was not comprehensively assessed. The facility's policy and procedure titled Skin Care Program and dated 6/17/2019, documents: -The policy is for every resident who enters the facility will be evaluated within 8 hours to prevent the formation of pressure injuries. -Measuring Wounds As Follows: size, length, width, top of wound, depth and any undermining/tunneling;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 (R59 and R96) of 5 residents reviewed were provided pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice, including completing comprehensive assessment, developing a comprehensive person-centered care plan and evaluating the resident's goals and preferences. Findings include: On 6/9/25, the facilities policy and procedure titled Pain Management dated 1/16/19 was reviewed and documented: The 0-10 pain scale will be used for the alert resident. A pain data collection tool will be completed at a minimum on admission, readmission, quarterly and with any change of condition. The pain data tool will include: pain history, description of pain, non-pharmacological approaches that work for the resident. Location of pain, Resident's goal of pain management. Care plan is to include the residents underlying diagnosis or conditions that are causing or contributing to pain, residents goal for pain management, and pharmalogic and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, drugs used in the facility were not labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, to include the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 2 medication rooms and 1 of 3 medication carts observed. Medication rooms and carts contained insulin that was expired, and insulin and eye drops that were not dated when opened. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Medication and Vaccine Storage effective date [DATE] documents (in part) . . Policy statement: Medications will be stored safely, securely and properly. The medication supply will only be accessible to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, and staff members authorized to pass medications. 5. Outdated or contaminated medications or those in cracked or soiled or without secure closures are removed from the medication cart and disposed of properly. Medications will be reordered as needed. 9. Medications will be stored in their original packing until ready for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure staff were trained to safely use a hoyer lift with support bars. This was observed with 1 (R2) of 1 residents using this type of Hoyer Lift. R2 obtained a bruise by their eye due to staff using the Hoyer Lift incorrectly. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure, Safe Transfers, revision date of 7/1/2021. The Policy documents: Residents admitted to Lutheran Home will be assessed to ensure appropriate and recommended transfer techniques are in place to direct safe resident transfers. On 2/3/25, at 9:03 AM, Surveyor spoke with R2 in their room. R2 stated they had a bruise by their eye from the hoyer lift. R2 stated this happened on 12/28/24 and their eye still hurts. Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 is their own person. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment is a Significant Change in Status completed 11/16/2024. This MDS documents R2 does not have any cognitive impairments and is dependent on staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI