Resolve at West Allis Respiratory and Rehab
9047 W Greenfield Ave, West Allis, WI 53214 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 152 certified beds · (414) 453-9290 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $130,322 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-14)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.5% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.6% | 2.1% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.2% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.8% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.1% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.3% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.2% | 24.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.4% | 15.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 11.3% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.5% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 15.5% | 12.0% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.0–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 12.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.27 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 72.3 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 80 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.447 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.20 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries, and with pressure injuries, were comprehensively assessed in order to implement an individualized plan of care. This was observed with 6 (R95, R101, R107, R100, R68, and R88) of 6 residents reviewed with pressure injuries and at risk for pressure injuries. * R95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and identified as being high risk for pressure injuries. R95 was not comprehensively assessed in order to implement an individualized plan of care for prevention of pressure injuries or implement care plan revisions with pressure injury onset. R95 developed a facility acquired unstageable pressure injury to the sacrum on 6/15/23 which deteriorated. On 7/21/23, R95 was hospitalized with sepsis secondary to sacral wound infection with a stage 4 pressure injury to the sacrum. This resulted in immediate jeopardy to R95. * R101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a SDTI (suspected deep tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 4 (R1, R8, R10 and R25) of 7 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with an unstageable Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) to R1's left heel. Surveyor observed R1's heels to not be offloaded on 3 separate occasions (4/26/2026, 4/27/2026 and 4/28/2026). On 4/27/2026, R1's wound has nearly doubled in size since initial assessment. The example regarding R1 is being cited at a scope and severity of a G (actual harm/isolated). The examples regarding R8, R10, and R25 are examples at the scope and severity of a D (potential for harm/isolated). *R8 had a Stage 4 pressure injury to the sacrum that developed osteomyelitis due to the Nurse Practitioner intervention recommendation not being implemented. *R10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 1 (R3) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R3 is dependent for all cares and mobility, is at high risk for developing pressure injuries and has a history of pressure injuries. On 5/2/25, facility documented that R3 had developed a pressure injury to R3's left ear. The pressure injury was not comprehensively assessed and there is no documentation that R3's MD was contacted until 5/4/25 when a treatment order was put in place. From 5/7/25 through 5/14/25, R5 was admitted to the hospital for a different change of condition. The initial skin evaluation on readmission to the facility documented that R3 had a stage 2 pressure injury of the left ear, and a treatment was ordered to be completed every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for bowel and bladder function to prevent infections and skin impairment. This was observed with 4 (R101, R95, R100, and R15) of 5 residents reviewed with bowel and bladder incontinence upon admission to the facility. -R101 was admitted to the facility with both bowel and bladder incontinence. An individual assessment of R101's continence status was not completed to develop an individualized plan of care. On 8/14/23, R101 was determined to have a urinary tract infection (UTI). On 8/16/23, R101 was determined to have an unstageable pressure injury and was started on antibiotics for the UTI. On 8/18/23, a Foley catheter was placed for R101 without an individualized plan of care or for clear justification for the use of the Foley catheter. R101 developed multiple urinary tract infections while continuing to use a Foley catheter without ongoing assessment or clear indications for use. R101 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure it completed accurate mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform electronic format to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This had the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility.Staffing information for Quarter 1 (October 1 - December 31, 2025) of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) was not accurately submitted to CMS.Findings include:The CMS Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, indicates: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS .1.2 Submission Timelines and Accuracy. Direct care staffing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 4 resident unit refrigerators in the facility and 1 of 1 meat/dairy cooler. *Observations of black, moldlike substances in the kitchen walk in cooler.*Ice buildup in the kitchen freezer*Condiments in kitchen walk in cooler were expired and/or not dated.This deficient practice has the potential to affect 62 of 79 residents whom receive food from main kitchen. Findings:The facility's undated policy, titled Food Safety Requirements documents: 1. Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process. This process begins when food is received from the vendor and ends with delivery of the food to the resident. Elements of the process include the following: . b. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (R49) of 18 residents.*The facility experienced water damage to the ceiling in R49's room causing R49 to be concerned of ceiling integrity and organic growth. The facility did not remediate the water damage to R49's ceiling in a timely manner.Findings include:On 04/26/2026, at 9:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed R49. R49 informed Surveyor that water has leaked from ceiling multiple times over last month causing water damage to the ceiling tiles. Surveyor noted brown stained blotches on the ceiling above R49's bed, and above R49's doorway. R49 stated R49 mentioning the concerns to Director of Nursing (DON)-B multiple times but feels it has been shrugged off. R49 informed Surveyor that R49 has also talked to maintenance and they are having a hard time finding tiles. R49 is concerned for the integrity of the ceiling and would like the tiles taken down.On 04/27/2026, at 10:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed Maintenance Director-Q who indicated being newer to his role.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations of neglect were reported immediately to the State Agency, but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made for 1 of 2 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) reviewed. The facility received notification that R10 made an allegation of neglect on 1/23/26 at 7:00 PM and did not report the allegation to the State Agency until 1/26/26 at 3:14 PM. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, with no implemented or revised date documents: Policy: it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g. law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: . not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R25 & R57) of 2 residents were notified of the reason for transfer/discharge & bed hold policy in writing to the resident & their representative and the rate to reserve the resident's bed was not documented in the Transfer, Bed hold Notice form. * There is no evidence R25 and/or R25's representative was provided a copy of the bed hold/ transfer notice for R25's hospitalization on 7/19/2025 and the bed hold notice did not document the bed hold rate for R25's hospitalization on 10/27/2025. * R57 was transferred to the hospital on 3/25/2026 and 4/10/2026. The bed hold and transfer notices for the two separate transfers were combined and not individualized for each transfer. Findings include: The facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice with no initiated or reviewed/revised date documents: It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/ or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure dependent residents received the necessary services to maintain nail care for 1 (R5) of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs).R5, an ADL dependent resident, was observed with long and dirty fingernails from 4/26/26 to 4/28/26.Findings include: The facility's undated policy, titled Nail Care, documents: Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .2. Identify conditions that increase risk for foot or nail problems, such as diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, renal disease, or stroke. 3. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis. 4. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule. Nail care will be provided between scheduled occasions as the need arises.R1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R25) of 18 residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice.*R25 had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line placed on 4/13/26. R25 has an MD order for the PICC line dressing to be changed every 7 days. Surveyor observed R25's PICC line dressing on 4/26/26 and 4/28/26. During observation, R25's PICC line dressing was dated 4/13/26, indicating that R25's PICC line dressing was not changed from 4/13/26 to 4/28/26. R25's IV medication care plan was not initiated until 4/27/26, which is 2 weeks after the PICC line was placed. Findings include:The facility policy dated 10/2024 and titled, Dressing change for vascular access devices, documents, in part: Purpose-To prevent local systemic infection related to the IV catheter. Policy- A sterile dressing is maintained on all peripheral and central vascular access devices to protect the site, provide a microbial barrier and to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure staff followed infection control procedures for 1 (R25) of 2 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter.* R25's catheter bag was observed lying directly on the ground without a barrier. R25 is considered high risk for infection with a history of urinary tract infections (UTIs) with sepsis.Findings include:R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include Multiple Sclerosis (autoimmune disease of the central nervous system affecting the brain, spinal cord, and eye nerves) , Alzheimer's Disease, obstructive and reflex uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract that stops urine from flowing), anxiety disorder, metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction) , neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, retention of urine and history of urinary tract infections with Sepsis.R25's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that R25 was assessed to have intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with recommendations to wear a helmet when out of bed or chair to prevent brain injury from falling or head trauma after having a craniotomy (a surgical procedure in which a neurosurgeon temporarily removes a section of the skull). R1's care plan for activities of daily living (ADLs) identifies the need for R1 to wear a helmet; dated 1/2/26. The facility assessed R1 being at risk for falls and did not place orders for R1's helmet until 1/20/26. The facility did not verify recommendations/orders with the physician to determined when R1 is to wear a helmet until 1/27/26.Findings include:The facility's undated policy titled, Use of Assistive Devices, documents the following:The purpose of this policy is to provide a reliable process for the proper and consistent use of assistive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for 1 resident (R5) of 3 observed receiving medications. The facility medication error rate was 6.89%. *R5 received one ergocalciferol oral capsule 1.25mg. R5's physician order documents ergocalciferol oral capsule 1.25mg, give 2 capsule by mouth in the morning every Wed (Wednesday) for vitamin D deficiency. *R5 received one zinc 50mg tablet. R5's physician order documents zinc-220 oral capsule, give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day. Findings include: On 1/28/26, at 7:32am, Surveyor observed medications being administered to R5. Medication Technician (MT)-G prepared 18 medications to administer to R5. Surveyor observed MT-G add one ergocalciferol oral capsule 1.25mg and one zinc 50mg tablet to the medication cup that R5 was to receive. Surveyor noted upon review of the Physician Orders the order for ergocalciferol oral capsule 1.25mg documents ergocalciferol oral capsule 1.25mg, give 2 capsule by mouth in the morning every Wed (Wednesday) for vitamin D deficiency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 3 (R2, R3, and R4) of 3 residents and/or representative were notified of the reason for transfer/discharge in writing and the rate to reserve the residents' bed was not documented in the Bed Hold and Notice of Transfer. *R2 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and 12/28/25. The facility's transfer and discharge notice was not provided in writing and in a language understood to R2 and/or R2's representative. R2's bed hold notices did not document the facility per diem daily rate. *R3 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], 12/2/25, 12/7/25 and 12/11/25. The facility's transfer and discharge notice was not provided in writing and in a language understood to R3 and/or R3's representative. R3's bed hold notices did not document the facility per diem daily rate. *R4 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The facility's transfer and discharge notice was not provided in writing and in a language understood to R4 and/or R4's representative. R4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure there was a medication error rate below 5 percent. There were 2 medication errors in 31 opportunities which resulted in a medication error rate of 6.45%. Medication errors were identified for R7 & R9.*R7's Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Solution 1% was not shaken prior to administration.*R9 was administered two drops of Cromolyn Sodium 4% eye drops into each eye without waiting one minute between drops.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Administration of Eye Drops or Ointments and not dated under Policy documents Eye medications are administered as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice to lubricate the eye or treat certain eye conditions.1.) On 1/14/26, at 12:16 p.m., Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C remove a glucometer and a clear bag containing R7's Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Solution 1% from the medication cart. Surveyor observed the clear bag containing this eye drop is affixed with a blue sticker instructing to shake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R7) of 1 resident were free of significant medication errors.R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7's has an order for Acetaminophen 1000 mg (milligrams) by mouth every 6 hours for pain/discomfort with a start date of 8/21/25. This order was not entered correctly, and Acetaminophen 1000 mg did not appear on R7's monthly medication administration records resulting in R7 not receiving Acetaminophen 1000 mg every six hours daily. R7 missed 48 doses in August 2025, 120 doses in September 2025, 124 doses in October 2025, 120 doses in November 2025, 124 doses in December 2025, and 53 doses in January 2026. R7 was not administered 589 doses of Acetaminophen 1000 mg.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Medication Orders and not dated under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents for 4. Documentation of Medication Orders: a. Each medication order should be documented with the date, time and signature of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 1 (R11) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration via Enteral Tube (ET) (a tube that is connected to the digestive system and is used to deliver hydration, nutrition, or medications.) R11 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), a staff member placed a graduated cylinder and syringe, from R11's room that's used for R11's ET cares, on the nurse's medication cart leaving residual fluid on the cart. The staff member did not sanitize the cart but then began preparing the next medication administration for another resident by placing cups on the contaminated cart/fluid. R11 is on EBP, a staff member did not maintain EBP after providing cares to R11. The staff member did not remove Personal Protective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to determine one of five sampled residents (Resident (R) 5) was safe in the self-administration of physician ordered medications. This failure had the potential for R5 not to take his medication and experience adverse effects of not taking the physician ordered medications.Findings include:Review of R5's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile' tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis which included type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and transient ischemic attack.Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/23/25 indicated R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R5 was cognitively intact.Review of R5's Physician Orders located under the Orders tab in the EMR indicated the following orders:-08/29/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was timely for two of three residents (Resident (R)1 and R5) reviewed for late medications out of five sampled residents. This failure had the potential to interfere with the medication effectiveness.Findings include:1.Review of R1's updated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of quadriplegia, and pressure ulcer to left buttock.Review of R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/25 indicated R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R1 was cognitively intact. R1 was also coded as having a stage three pressure ulcer that was unhealed.During an interview on 10/13/25 at 2:55 PM, R1 stated he either received his medications too early or late. R1 reported the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and document review, the facility failed 1. to prime an unused insulin pen prior to the injection of insulin as well as 2. failed to ensure the insulin was administered as ordered for one of five sampled residents (Resident (R)5). This failure had the potential for R5 not to receive the physician ordered amount of insulin to R5 and the potential to have uncontrolled blood sugars as a result of this action.Findings include:Review of R5's Review of R5's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile' tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis which included type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and transient ischemic attack.Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/23/25 indicated R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R5 was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines during a wound care observation for two of three residents (Resident (R)1 and R4) observed out of five sampled residents. This failure had the potential for R1 and R4 to be exposed to infections.Findings include:1.Review of R1's updated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of quadriplegia, and pressure ulcer to left buttock.Review of R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/25 indicated R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R1 was cognitively intact. R1 was also coded as having a stage three pressure ulcer that was unhealed.Review of R1's Physician Orders located under the Orders tab in the EMR indicated an order dated 10/06/25 for Left buttock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (R5) of 3 residents observed with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). *R5 has a facility acquired pressure injury to the sacral area. On 6/26/25 Surveyor observed R5's wound treatment. Facility staff did not wear the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while performing R5's wound treatment. Findings include: On 6/26/25 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor observed Centers for Disease Control (CDC) signage outside of R5's room. CDC signage documented the following: Enhanced Barrier Precautions-Everyone must clean their hands before entering and prior to leaving room. Providers and Staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, Changing briefs or assisting with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0579 — isolatedProvide information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, document review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one of one (Resident (R) 2) family member (F1) was provided with a timely refund for paying privately prior to the approval of R2's Medicaid application for long-term care services. Findings include: Review of an email that was provided by the facility dated 03/14/25 and written by the Clinical Liaison/admission Coordinator indicated she was notified by R2's representative that the resident was approved by long-term care Medicaid coverage. Review of a document provided by the facility referred to as a sample admission Packet undated indicated, . Facility may provide information needed in applying for coverage under Medicare, Medicaid or third-party insurance, but you are responsible for applying for and maintaining coverage. For example, the daily basic rate will apply, and payment will be due from the Resident's personal funds while a Medicaid application is pending . The estimated Resident Liability will continue until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R)1) care plan out of a survey sample of 15, accurately reflected the resident's current status. This failure created an increased risk for the resident to receive care and services not appropriate for their current clinical condition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person, Centered dated 03/22 indicated, . Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R1's EMR titled Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab dated 01/08/24 indicated the resident's code status was a full code. Review of R1's EMR significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/26/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility policy review, and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies during wound care related to staff failing to perform hand hygiene during glove changes for one of two residents (Resident (R) 6) observed for wound care in the sample of 15 residents. In addition, the Respiratory Therapist (RP)1 failed to apply appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to performing a respiratory treatment for one of one resident (R1) with a tracheostomy in the sample of 15 The deficient practice increased the risk for cross contamination and infections. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised October 2023 provided by the facility indicated, Hand hygiene is indicated: . before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same resident; and immediately after glove removal. Applying and Removing Gloves: Perform hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the representative of a hospital transfer for one of two residents (Resident (R) reviewed for hospital transfer out of a total sample of 17. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Determining Decision-Making Capacity, revised 09/2017, revealed, . Physicians and staff shall collaborate to define each resident/patient's decision-making capacity . Residents/patients who lack decision-making capacity will have decisions made by an appropriately authorized substitute decision-maker. 3. The facility's care will be consistent with related clinical standards of practice and will comply with applicable laws and regulations related to determining decision-making capacity . Procedures 4. Based on these assessments and related discussions, and consistent with applicable laws and regulations, the physician and staff will define an individual's decision-making capacity and will document the basis for such conclusions in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free of staff to resident abuse for two of 17 residents (Resident (R ) 2 and R7) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 17. This failure created the potential for these and other residents to experience further abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated Freedom from Abuse and Neglect Policy read, in pertinent part, Purpose: To prohibit abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of property; and Definition: Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. 1. Review of R2's admission Record, dated 03/13/25 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included quadriplegia. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of potential abuse for one out of 17 residents (Resident (R) R7) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 17. This failure created the potential for this and other residents to experience further abuse. Findings include: The facility's undated Freedom from Abuse and Neglect Policy read, in pertinent part, Staff will immediately report any suspicious event or injury that may constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation to the Executive Director (Administrator.) Review of R7's admission Record, dated 03/13/25 and found in the EMR under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/14/25 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of 17 residents (Resident (R) R2 reviewed in the sample received his medication routinely as ordered by his physician. This failure caused multiple medication errors during the resident's medication administration, which created the potential for this resident to experience significant negative physical effects related to the errors. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration - General Guidelines Policy, dated 12/2019, read, in pertinent part, FIVE Rights - Right resident, right drug, right dose, right route and right time, are applied for each medication being administered. Review of R2's admission Record, dated 03/13/25 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included quadriplegia and orthostatic hypotension. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review., the facility did not ensure that 1 (R79) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge, had a discharge plan that was developed or implemented in an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals and resident safety. *R79 stated a desire to return home after being admitted to the facility. R79 was scheduled for discharge on [DATE] and 12/2/2024. R79's care plan was developed without including measurable objectives or defined interventions consistent with R79's needs and goals. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Discharge Planning Process, dated 1/10/2024, states: Procedure: 1. A Discharge plan of care will be developed for each resident and will be included as part of the Comprehensive Care Plan. 2. The discharge plan of care must: -Identify needs that must be addressed before the resident can be discharged , such as resident education, rehabilitation, and caregiver support and education. -Be re-evaluated regularly and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 (R50) of 19 resident's reviewed for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). *R50's request for nail trim and face shave was not completed. The explanation for why R50 did not receive a beard trim and nails trimmed is that R50 refuses baths. R50 did not have a plan of care to address R50's refusals. The facility did not assist in providing personal hygiene that did not require a full bath to complete. Findings include: The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018 documents: Policy Statement: Residents will provided [sic] with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R57) of 1 residents reviewed for Dialysis received Dialysis care in accordance with professional standards of practice. *R57 did not have a MD (Medical Doctor) order for monitoring R57's Arterio-Venous (AV) Fistula for bruit (whooshing sound of blood flow) or thrill (palpable vibration of the blood flow) until 12/2/24, which was after the current Recertification Survey began. There is no evidence staff were monitoring R57's AV fistula site for bruit or thrill from the end of the last Recertification Survey (6/11/24) through 12/2/24. Findings include: Vascular Access Fact Sheet developed by the American Nephrology Nurses Association and copyrighted in 2023, documents, in part: . Measures can be taken to prevent clotting or infection to the access. Patency is assessed by feeling the 'thrill' or vibration of blood through the access or using a stethoscope to listen to the 'bruit' or 'whoosh' of blood through the access. The patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a sanitary environment was maintained to help prevent the potential development of infections for 1 (R71) of 7 residents observed during wound care. R71 was incontinent of liquid stool prior to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C doing a dressing change to R71's Stage 4 pressure injury to the coccyx. LPN-C did not provide incontinence care to clean the buttocks or intergluteal cleft prior to completing the dressing change potentially contaminating the dressing and introducing fecal matter into the Stage 4 pressure injury. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Wound Care from Med-Pass ©2001 revised 2010 documents: Steps in the Procedure: . 11. Place one (1) gauze to cover all broken skin. Wash tissue around the wound that is usually covered by the dressing, tape or gauze with antiseptic or soap and water. 16. Discard disposable items into the designated container. Discard all soiled laundry, linen, towels, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R4) of 1 Residents reviewed for grievances has the right to voice grievances in writing, in a manner they prefer, and receive written grievance decisions. On 4/29/24 the facility issued a letter to residents and/or their representatives informing them they would not accept grievances emailed to the facility. Resident's grievances do not include whether their issues were confirmed or not confirmed and the date written decisions were issued to the individual with the grievance/concern Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Grievance/Concern Process and not dated under procedure documents: 1. The facility must notify the residents individually or through posting in prominent locations throughout the facility of the right to file grievances orally (meaning spoken) or in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; the contact information of the grievance officer with whom a grievance can be filed, that is his or her name, business address and business phone number; a reasonable expected time frame for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not report 1 (R6) of 3 incidents to the State survey agency and/or Nursing Home Administrator during the required timeframe. An allegation of verbal abuse and possible neglect on 7/10/24 was not reported to NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A or the State agency until 7/16/24 which was 6 days after the incident occurred. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Freedom from Abuse and Neglect not dated under Reporting and Response documents: 1. Allegations will be reported to the Executive Director immediately. 2. The facility will report all alleged violations and substantiated incidents to the state agency and to all other agencies as required and will take all necessary corrective actions depending on the results of the investigation. R6's diagnoses includes epilepsy, anoxic brain injury, and depression. The quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 8/8/24 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status score of 14 which indicates cognitively intact. The Facility's investigation for Resident Name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 2 Residents received prescribed medication as ordered by the physician. On 7/10/24 the medication cart and narcotics drawer were observed open & unlocked. RN (Registered Nurse) Supervisor-D removed 2 medication cards from the narcotics drawer of the unlocked medication cart for R2. R2 did not receive her Tramadol HCL 50 mg (milligrams) and Lorazepam 0.25 mg as ordered by the physician during the evening medication pass. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Medication Administration -General Guidelines and dated March 2021 under procedures for B. Administration #2 documents Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. #16 documents During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. No medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program based upon current standards of practice, designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice has the potential to several of the 79 residents. The facility's Water Management Plan (WMP) was not based on current standards of practice and did not: ~Include water management team members who were knowledgeable about the facility's water system. ~Identify all locations where Legionella could grow and spread. ~Identify where control measures should be applied based on where Legionella could grow and spread and identify how to monitor the control measures and risks. ~Identify acceptable ranges of control limits (temperature ranges) and corrective actions to take when control limits are not met. ~Identify what actions should be taken to protect all residents when a resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who entered the facility with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 (R47) residents reviewed for range of motion. R47 was not wearing her palm protectors during survey. Findings include: R47 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Bipolar Disorder, Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Morbid Obesity, Hypertension, Cerebral Infarction and Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. The facility policy titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion revised July 2017 documents (in part) . .2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM (range of motion). 5. The care plan will include specific interventions, exercises, and therapies to maintain, prevent avoidable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure it's medication error rate is not 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.45% affecting 1 of 4 (R76) residents observed during medication pass. R76 was administered medications crushed, which is contraindicated. Findings include: The facility policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures dated March 2021 documents (in part) . .Purpose: To administer oral medications in a safe, accurate and effective manner. Special Considerations: A. Refer to crushing guidelines (See Appendix 1: Medication Crushing Guidelines) prior to crushing any medication for assurance that it can be pulverized. B. Appendix 1: Medication crushing guidelines dated March 2021 documents (in part) . .Medications that should not be crushed or chewed: The solid dosage forms of many medications should not be crushed or chewed for a variety of reasons. When a resident's condition prohibits the administration of solid dosage forms (tablets, capsules, etc.), the nurse administering the medication should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that drugs and biological's used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice, to include the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 2 (R50 and R84) residents' insulin observed. Open and used insulin belonging to R50 and R84 were not dated when opened. Findings include: The facility policy titled Preparation and General Guidelines dated March 2021 documents (in part) . .Policy: Vials and ampules of injectable medications are used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations or the provider pharmacy's directions for storage, use, and disposal. Procedures: B. Expiration dates: Opening a vial or not following storage requirements triggers a shortened expiration date that is unique for that product. The date opened and this triggered expiration date are both important to be recorded on multidose vials on the vial label or an accessory label affixed for that purpose. At a minimum, the date opened must be recorded. F. USP <797> guidelines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R4) of 2 allegations involving potential abuse, neglect, misappropriation, injuries of unknown origin or exploitation were reported to the State Survey Agency. On 3/16/24 an unknown Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) informed R4 of rumors being spread in the facility. The rumors were that R4 was in a romantic relationship with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN-D) and that R4 was buying gifts for LPN-D. These rumors caused R4 to call the police. On 3/18/24, R4 reported to the Director of Nursing (DON-B) that R4 had bought various gifts for LPN-D. The facility did not identify this as an allegation of exploitation and did not report this allegation to the State Survey Agency. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled: WI Abuse and Neglect Policy and Exploitation, dated 1/23/2017, states, in part: Definition: To prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of property . Procedure: The facility staff will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure all allegations involving potential abuse, neglect, misappropriation, injuries of unknown origin and exploitation were thoroughly investigated for 1 (R4) of 2 allegations of abuse. R4 was told by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) of rumors that R4 had a romantic relationship with and was buying gifts for Liscenced Practical Nurse (LPN)-D. R4 reported this to a staff member who did not report it to administration. After R4 heard that LPN-D was suspended because of these rumors, R4 called the police. At this time the admiistration became aware of all the rumors about R4 and LPN-D. The facilty did not investigate this as an allegation of abuse or exploitation. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled: WI Abuse and Neglect Policy and Exploitation, dated 1/23/2017, states, in part: Definition: To prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of property . Procedure: The facility staff will conduct an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 4 ( R3, R4, R5, R2) of 4 Residents reviewed were provided medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. * R3 is assessed to be severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making skills and has a court appointed legal guardian. R3's capacity to consent to engage in sexual relationships was not regularly evaluated and documented on R3's plan of care. On 1/28/24 an allegation was made of R3 having oral sex with R5 in her room. R3's care plan was not updated to reflect parameters of male visitation in her room after 8:30 pm. There was no psychological evaluation to establish and/or support the capacity for consent for engaging in intimate relationships. The last psych evaluation was dated 2/2/22 which documented R3's thought process was difficult to determine and R3's judgement/insight is fair. This psych evaluation did not address R3's ability to consent to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident's right (R8) to be treated with dignity and respect in an environment that enhances R8's quality of life. R8 is assessed to have severe cognitive impairment with daily decision-making skills and requires assistance for dressing. On 12/20/23 at approximately 2:15pm, R8 was in the common area wearing a T-shirt and sweater and just a towel covering R8's waist area. R8 had no pants or brief on and was naked from the waist down. An allegation was made that 2 Residents (R5 and an additional unknown Resident) were laughing and pointing at R8. CNA-P was notified of the situation and removed R8 from the common area. CNA-P brought R8 to R8's room. R5 followed where R5 entered through R8's closed door without permission, was yelling and pointing in a threatening manner. R8 was observed to be naked from the waist down. R5 continued to yell and scream in a violent manner and violently pushed CNA-P's shoulder into the room door. R8 was noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the right of a Resident to receive visitors at the time of their choosing for 1 (R2) of 1 Resident reviewed for visitation rights. The facility restricted R2's husband immediate access to R2 unless R2's husband was accompanied either by their daughter who lives in Minnesota or son who has his own business. Findings include: The Visitation Policy 2001 Med-Pass Inc (Revised May 2017) under Policy Statement documents, Our facility permits residents to receive visitors subject to the resident's wishes and the protection of the rights of other residents in the facility. Under Policy Interpretation and Implementation includes documentation of: 1. We recognize the resident's need to maintain contact with the community in which he or she has lived or is familiar. Therefore, the resident is permitted to have visitors as he/she wishes. 2. The facility provides 24-hour access to all individuals visiting with the consent of the resident. Some visitation may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the Facility did not ensure to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for 3 (R2, R10, & R11) of 5 Resident's reviewed for their environment. * The base of R2's tube feeding pole was splattered with dried tube feeding and there was dried feeding on the floor. This was observed on 2/19/24, 2/20/24, 2/21/24, & 2/22/24. * There is a piece of wall paper missing on the wall to the left of R10's bed measuring approximately two feet in length by 4 inches in width. The cove base is missing next to the bathroom door. * There are two wall tiles that have come off the wall and are laying on the floor on the right side in R11's bathroom. Findings include: 1. R2's physician orders with an order date of 2/14/24 includes Enteral Feeding order four times a day for TF (tube feeding) Enteral Nutrition via Bolus: Osmolite 1.2 300 ml (milliliter) at frequency: 4x (times) day. Total ml's (milliliters)/24 hours: 1200 ml . FWF (free water flush) 100 ml pre/post feeding., On 2/19/24 at 9:34 a.m. Surveyor observed there is dried tube feeding on the floor near R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not promptly resolve a grievance for 1 (R1) of 1 grievance reviewed. On 1/20/24 R1's son filed a grievance that R1's echo show 8 (3rd generation) was missing. The date of resolution on the January grievance log is documented as 1/25/24. On 2/6/24 SSD (Social Service Director)-G indicated she was just informed the Facility needs a receipt for the item in order to submit for reimbursement. On 2/7/24 R1's son provided SSD-G with the order information from [Amazon] and this information was then provided to provided to Assistant Administrator-C on 2/7/24. As of 2/19/24 when Surveyor inquired about R1's son's grievance, R1's son was not provided with reimbursement for the missing echo show 8. R1's grievance was not resolved on 1/25/24. Findings include: The Grievance/Concern Process policy and procedure not dated under purpose documents To establish a process for responding to a resident or resident representative to resolve grievances a resident may have. Under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that 3 of 3 allegations of abuse (R5, R3, and R4) reviewed was reported no later than 2 hours and 1 of 1 allegation of misappropriation of funds(R3) was reported no later than 24 hours to the State Survey Agency and other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures. The facility did not report results of the investigations to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident and if the alleged violation required corrective action. *On 12/20/23, it was reported to administration that R5 had a physical altercation with certified nursing assistant (CNA-P). CNA-P and CNA-I provided written statements of the altercation between R5 and CNA-P and in which CNA-P ended up calling the police. The facility determined the altercation was a result of miscommunication, however had no further information as to what the miscommunication entailed. The facility did not submit an Alleged Nursing Home Resident Mistreatment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure all allegations involving potential abuse, neglect and misappropriation of Resident funds (R3) were thoroughly investigated for 3 Residents(R) (R5, R3, and R4,) of 3 Residents reviewed for all abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of Resident property investigations. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegations and the facility did not report the results of the investigations to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident and if the alleged violation required corrective action. * On 12/20/23, it was reported to administration that R5 had a physical altercation with certified nursing assistant (CNA-P). The facility did not complete a thorough investigation as evidenced by obtaining only 4 staff statements. The facility concluded this incident between R5 and CNA- P was as a result of miscommunication however the facility's investigation never identified what the miscommunication was about. The facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility did not ensure that Residents at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services to prevent the development of pressure injuries for 1 (R2) of 2 Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * On 2/20/24 and 2/21/24, R2 was observed in bed without the pressure relieving boot on R2's left foot per plan of care. Findings include: The Prevention of Pressure Injuries policy and procedure Revised January 2023 under Preparation documents Review the resident's care plan and identify the risk factors as well as the interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. R2's diagnoses includes multiple sclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, right below knee amputation, and hypertension. The at risk for further impaired skin integrity care plan initiated 8/23/23 & revised 2/15/24 includes an intervention initiated 8/23/23 & revised on 2/15/24 of Turn and reposition to maintain skin integrity Q2 hrs (every two hours).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure the necessary care and services to provide respiratory care for 3 (R2, R12, & R11) of 4 Residents receiving oxygen care. * R2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. There was no physician's order for R2's oxygen until 2/20/24. * The filter on R12's oxygen concentrator had dust and white particles throughout. * R11's oxygen concentrator had a coating of dust on the back vent portion, there was dust on the front of the concentrator throughout and under the humidifier bottle there was a large accumulation of dust & dirt. Findings include: The Oxygen Administration Policy & Procedure 2001 Med Pass Inc, (Revised October 2010) under Purpose documents The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under Preparation documents 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility wide assessment developed by the facility included all relevant details to ensure the facility provided care and services to residents to meet their individual needs within the facility's identified resources. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/5/23 at 4:15 pm, Surveyors met with the facility to discuss possible concerns regarding the facility Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAPI) process (Cross-reference F867). During this discussion Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and [NAME] President of Operations (VPO)-AA shared they believe the facility has a vigorous and exceptional QAPI program and the facility tends to take residents that other facilities will not admit, and their resident population has a higher acuity than other facilities. Surveyors discussed the facility assessment at this time and requested an up-to-date copy of the facility assessment. VPO-AA indicated the facility had just updated this document and provided a copy to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the mandatory staffing data that had been submitted from 4/1/23-6/30/23 was complete and accurate. This has the ability to affect all of the 99 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed staffing data from the third quarter (April-June) of 2023 related to the facility triggering for low weekend staffing on the Payroll Based Journal (PB&J). Surveyor noted one day in particular, Sunday, May 7th, 2023, where the facility had significantly lower staffing than required. According to time clock punches for that day, the facility had five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on dayshift, four CNAs on PM shift and 3 CNAs (plus one medication tech) on night shift. On 11/30/23 at 1:19 PM, Surveyor interviewed Staff Scheduler (SS)-H. SS-H informed Surveyor she was not the scheduler in May. Per SS-H the bare minimum CNAs needed for safety are 10 each on days and PMS and 8 on night shift. Surveyor reviewed the facility's grievance log and did not note a marked increase in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure residents the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 54 residents residing on the second floor. R63's room had multiple black half circle marks, missing paint and exposed dry wall next to bed. The South 2 hallway has two areas on floor tiles with large cracks/gaps. The second-floor dining room was observed to have a loveseat that was buckled down the middle and a metal screen frame on a window was bent. The corner of R2's nightstand is broken. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, dated 5/2017, states: Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. #2. The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 9.) R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vascular dementia, hemiplegia, sequelae following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, depressive disorder, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and paralytic syndrome. R15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates R15 is moderately cognitively impaired. R15 understands and is understood by others and is able to make their needs known. R15 is totally dependent on staff for transfers with a mechanical lift and requires extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, toileting and dressing. Review of R15's Care Plan documents R15 uses anti-anxiety medications (Lorazepam) due to anxiety, date initiated 7/8/22 and revised on 7/11/22. Switched from Buspirone to Lorazepam, date initiated 7/11/22. Interventions include, administer anti-anxiety medications as ordered by physician, educate (R15)/family/caregivers about risks, benefits and the side effects and/or toxic symptoms of Lorazepam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident is treated with dignity and ensured an environment that promotes enhancement of their quality of life. This occurred for 1 (R15) of 20 residents reviewed for dignity. R15 requested staff assistance to be changed and was told they would be changed later when it was time for their shower. R15 waited over two hours to be changed out of a urine-soaked brief. Just prior to receiving incontinence care, staff answered their personal cell phone while in the resident room and held a conversation for several minutes. R15 requested to have the bed linen changed as they were soiled and wet from laying in a urine-soaked brief for a prolonged period of time. Staff was observed telling R15 the bed linen was fine and proceeded to make the bed. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Dignity, revised date February 2021, states: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure residents had an individualized comprehensive plan of care. This was observed with 3 (R101, R95 and R55) of 20 resident comprehensive care plan reviews. -R101 was admitted to the facility with bowel and bladder incontinence and there was no comprehensive plan of care with individualized interventions to address bowel and bladder incontinence. -R95 was admitted to the facility with bowel and bladder incontinence and there was no comprehensive plan of care with individualized interventions to address bowel and bladder incontinence. - R55 was admitted with oxygen and there was no comprehensive plan of care with individualized interventions to address oxygen management. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy and procedures on Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022. The Policy indicates the following: 2. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within 7 days of the completion of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R34) of 5 residents reviewed for discharge received a thorough discharge summary in order to communicate necessary information to the resident, continuing care provider, and other authorized persons at the time of the anticipated discharge. *R34 discharged from the facility on 10/02/23. R34 had lab work drawn on 10/02/23 prior to discharge. R34's discharge summary did not include the results of the lab work and there was no documentation R34 or R34's representatives were aware of the lab results. Findings include: R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE]. R34 had diagnoses including type two Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease and Urinary Tract Infection. R34's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/28/23, documented R34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 12 indicating R34 had mild cognitive impairments. Surveyor noted the following active physician's orders in R34's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5%, with 4 errors of 29 opportunities, affecting 1 supplemental resident (R99) of 4 residents observed receiving medications. The facility medication error rate was 13.79%. *R99's placement of g-tube was not confirmed before medication administration, medications were combined and crushed together, and the doctor's order to flush with 30mL between each individual medication was not followed. *R99 did not have her Lidocaine patches applied per order and the patches were signed out on Medication Administration Record (MAR). *R99 did not receive her Pantoprazole Sodium Powder which was signed out on the MAR. *R99 was given Carvedilol 25mg after Surveyor observation completed and should have been held per doctor's order to hold for heart rate under 60. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Medication Administration dated 6/21/2017, states .8. Verify tube placement according to facility policy. 9. Flush with at least 30ml water prior to medication administration.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the nurse staff posting was accurate for the previous eight months having the potential to affect all 99 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the third quarter nurse staff postings and nurse schedules provided by the facility. Surveyor compared the nurse staff posting and the nurse schedule from 4/1/23 and noted the following: The Nurse schedule included 1 RN (Registered Nurse) on days; the nurse staff posting included 0 hours for dayshift RN and 1.94 FTE's (Full Time Employees) for dayshift RN. The nurse schedule included 6 LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses) on dayshift; the posting included 22.50 hours for LPNs on dayshift and 5.66 FTEs for LPNs on dayshift. The nurse schedule included 10 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) on dayshift; the posting included 36.50 hours for CNAs on dayshift and 8.31 FTEs for CNAs on dayshift. Surveyor noted the numbers on the nurse staff posting did not match the nurse schedule. Surveyor was unsure what FTE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$130,322 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $130,322 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-12 for 12 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525108. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.