Arthur B Hodges Center, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 20 beds and averages 18.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.48 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.92 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.73 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner by leaving bags of frozen food open in the freezer. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 17. Findings include: a) During the initial tour of the kitchen on 06/02/25 at approximately 11:45 AM, one (1) bag of burgers and one (1) bag of carrots open, in the freezer, exposed to the elements. This was confirmed by the Dietary Manager (DM), at the same time, who was present during the tour.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on electronic medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for treatments for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: #118. Facility census: 17. Findings included: a) Resident #118 A review of the Significant Change MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/09/25 found the areas of Section C, D, and E were not marked. Section C was regarding turning and repositioning Section D regarded nutrition and Section E regarded Pressure Ulcer Care Resident #118 was receiving all these treatments. On 06/04/25 at 1:20 PM in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed the Significant Change MDS did not include treatments the resident was receiving regarding a pressure ulcer.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise Resident #8 as it related to contractures. This was true for one (1) of nine (9) care plans reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifier: 8. Facility census: 17. Findings include: a) Resident #8 During a review of Resident #8's electronic health record on 6/02/25, it was noted the resident had a contracture of her right and left lower legs. A subsequent review of the resident's care plan revealed there was no mention of the contractures. Further review of Resident #8's records revealed she was diagnosed with stiffness in both the right and left knees in January of 2024, which was included in the care plan. The resident was diagnosed with contractures in both lower legs in April of 2025. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/3/2025 at approximately 3:45 PM, she confirmed she did not see the contractures mentioned in the care plan. At approximately 4:00 PM on 06/3/25, during an interview with the MDS Nurse, it was confirmed the resident's care plan did not include the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders as it related to sliding scale insulin administration, by failing to administer the insulin as directed. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey process. Resident identifier: #2. Facility census: 17. Findings include: a) Resident #2 At approximately 9:30 AM on 06/03/25 during a review of Resident #2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) it was determined the resident had the following order for insulin administration on a sliding scale: Novolog flexpen 100 unit/ml sub-q. three times a day. accu check before meals with sliding scale coverage: 141-170- 1 unit. 171-200- 2 units, 201-230- 3 units, 231-260-4 units, 261-290- 5 units. 291-320- 6 units, 321-350- 7 units, 351-380- 8 units. 381-400- 9 units. Further review indicated, according to an entry at approximately 5:00 AM on 6/3/2025, the resident had a blood sugar of 148 which calls for the resident to receive one (1) unit of insulin, according to the physician ' s orders. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately document the percentage of meal intake for Resident #118. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for weight loss during the survey process. Resident identifier: 118. Facility census: 17. Findings include: A) Resident #118 During a review of Resident #118 ' s electronic medical record on 6/4/2025, it was determined the facility did not document the percentage of meals consumed by the resident on the following days: 11/14/2024- Lunch 11/28/2024- Lunch 12/2/2024- Lunch 12/5/2024- Lunch 12/31/2024- Breakfast 1/2/2025- Breakfast and Lunch 1/28/2025- Lunch 1/29/2025- Lunch 3/12/2025- Lunch 3/14/2025- Lunch 4/10/2025- Lunch 4/26/2025- Lunch 5/13/2025- Lunch 5/19/2025- Lunch 5/25/2025- Lunch At approximately 2:05 PM on 6/4/2025, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview, the DON confirmed the missing meal percentages.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to label and date food items that were open and failed to dispose of expired food items. The facility also failed to serve food under sanitary conditions from the 2nd floor Serving Pantry. These failed practices had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Facility Census: 18. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled : Food Product Dating read as follows. All food products will be labeled and dated appropriately. .1. Upon delivery, all foods will be dated/labeled-use first in, first out. 2. Can food and spices may be stored up to one year or manufacture expiration date. 3. Open/cooked food may be kept up to 72 hours. They are to be appropriately sealed, labeled and dated with the use by date. a) 2nd Floor Serving Pantry Observation on 08/21/23 starting at 12: 39 PM, on the second floor serving pantry with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #21, found the following: The Dietary employee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for four (4) of 11 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifiers: #11, #15, #16, #22. Facility census: 18. Findings included: a) Resident #16 Review of Resident #16's nursing progress notes showed a note for 06/30/23 that documented a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the mid-spine had resolved and the resident had developed a deep tissue injury to the right heel. Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 07/06/23 documented the resident had a stage 2 pressure ulcer. Further review of Resident #16's nursing progress notes showed a note for 07/07/23 that continued to document a deep tissue injury to the right heel. During an interview on 08/22/23 at 2:00 PM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #16's MDS with ARD 07/06/23 was incorrect and should have documented the presence of one (1) deep tissue injury instead of one (1) stage 2 pressure ulcer. No further information was provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide Resident #17, Resident #1, and Resident #13 with a dignified dining experience. The facility failed to serve all residents sitting at the same table their noon meal prior to serving others. This is true for three (3) of eight (8) residents eating the noon meal in the main dining area. Resident Identifiers: #17, #1 and #13. Facility Census:18 Findings Included: a) Resident #17 During a dining room observation on 08/21/23 starting at 12:35 PM Resident #17, was not served the noon meal while the other Resident at the same table was eating. b) Resident #1 During a dining room observation on 08/21/23 starting at 12:35 PM, Resident #1 was not served the noon meal while the other Resident at the same table was eating. c) Resident #13 During a dining room observation on 08/21/23 starting at 12:35 PM, Resident #13 was not served the noon meal while the other Resident at the same table was eating. During an interview on 08/21/23 at 12:48 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged Resident #17, Resident #1 and Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely submit a discharge tracking Minimum Data Sets (MDS) for Resident #8 after the Residents death at the facility. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of Resident Assessment during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #8. Facility census: 18. Findings included: a) Resident #8 During a record review on 08/22/23 at 10:16 AM, Resident #8's medical record included a nurses note dated 03/30/23 at 11:29 AM, Called to room at approximately 9:45 per assigned LPN, upon evaluation resident skin is color grey, no rise and fall of chest noted, no heart beat upon auscultation. Further record review Resident #8 MDS was not completed and/or transmitted upon death in the facility. During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:15 PM the MDS Coordinator #28, acknowledged a death in the facility MDS was not completed or transmitted.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan in the area of anticoagulation therapy for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications Resident identifier: #9. Facility census: 18. Findings included: a) Resident #9 Review of Resident #9's physician's orders showed the resident had been receiving injections of the anticoagulation medication enoxaparin (Lovenox) since 08/03/23 to prevent blood clots from a femur fracture. Review of Resident #9's comprehensive care plan did not show a focus and interventions related to anticoagulation medication. During an interview on 08/22/23 at 2:21 PM, the Minimum Data Set Coordinator confirmed Resident #9 was not care planned for anticoagulation therapy. She agreed it would be important to include anticoagulation therapy on Resident #9's care plan. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 64 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV