No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fairmont Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center LLC

130 Kaufman Drive, Fairmont, WV 26554 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (304) 363-5633 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$17,959 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,959 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-31)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Med Plus1.2 mi
48 V I P Way · (304) 366-6200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
627 Fairmont Ave · (304) 366-4526 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1208 Fairmont Ave · (304) 366-8222 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Morris Park, Pleasant Valley Rd, Fairmont , 26554, United States · (304) 366-4550 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1564 Mary Lou Retton Dr · (304) 363-2104

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.1%14.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms49.2%7.6%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.1%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.5%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.6%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.0%13.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.6%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.1%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.8%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.121.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.691.841.80typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.3%CMS range 31.0–49.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.8–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.2–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.701.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
68.3%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 100.1 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-04)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

72 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, records, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from abuse, resulting in mental anguish for Resident #47, #34, and #83. Specifically, Resident #73 was reportedly touching female residents in the breast and vaginal area. This situation indicates that an unlimited number of female residents had the potential to be affected. The facility's lack of action to identify this unwelcome sexual contact and prevent its recurrence placed Residents #47, #34, and #83 at continued risk of sexual abuse prior to Surveyor intervention. Using the reasonable person concept, the facility's failure to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual abuse/resident-to-resident sexual aggression more than likely resulted in mental anguish and psychosocial harm for Residents #47, #34, and #83. Resident identifiers: #47, #34, and #83. Facility census: 103.Findings included:a) Policy ReviewThe facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from abuse that resulted in mental anguish for Residents #47, #34, and #83. Resident #73 was reportedly touching female residents in the breast and vaginal area. An unlimited about of female residents had the potential to be affected. The facility's failure to thoroughly investigate, correct, and prevent inappropriate sexual contact placed Residents #47, #34, and #83 at continued risk of sexual abuse prior to Surveyor intervention. This cread an immediate jeopardy situation. Facility census: 103.Findings included:a) Policy ReviewThe facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, with a revision date of 2021, stated that residents had the right to be from abuse which included sexual or physical abuse. It also mentioned a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to protect residents from abuse by anyone, noting that it could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. The facility failed to provide a fire blanket, fire extinguisher, a metal can with a self-closing lid, and staff supervision when Resident #25 was observed smoking in the designated smoking area. Additionally, treatment carts were left unlocked and unattended on the 100 Hallway and the 300 Hallway. Resident Identifier: #25. Facility Census: 106.The facility's failure to follow their Smoking Policy by not providing a fire blanket, fire extinguisher, a metal can with a self-closing lid, and staff supervision when Resident #25 was observed outside smoking in the designated smoking area placed all smoking residents currently residing in the facility at risk for serious bodily harm and/or death. These failures were determined to place all smoking residents in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, electronic medical record, facility record review and Operation Policy the facility failed to implement their written policy for thoroughly investigating allegations of sexual abuse. This was true of one (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for sexual abuse. Resident identifiers: #34, #83 and #47. Facility census: 103.A review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, with a revision date of 2021, revealed that residents had the right to be from abuse which included sexual or physical abuse. It also mentioned a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to protect residents from abuse by anyone, noting that it could be from other residents. Nowhere in the policy was there a definition of sexual abuse. However, the policy did direct that all possible incidents of abuse were to be identified and investigated. Additionally, the facility was to establish and implement a QAPI review and analysis of reports, allegations, or finding of abuse. The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) was notified immediately concerning an allegation of abuse and to keep the MPOA updated on the findings. This practice affected two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #34. Facility census: 103.Findings include: R a) Resident #34On June 14, 2025, a sexual abuse allegation was reported involving Resident #73, who had his hand down Resident #34's shirt. An investigation was conducted, and the residents were separated. Law enforcement, the MPOA, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Administrator (ADM) were all notified. A quarterly MDS assessment on 06/27/25, showed Resident #34 with a BIMS score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment and lack of capacity. The 5-Day report verified the incident, confirming that Resident #73 inappropriately touched Resident #34. During an interview on 08/07/25, at 12:20 PM, Resident #34's responsible party stated she was initially made aware of a possible incident on June 14,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and investigation, the facility's management, by their inaction, and decisions in administering the facility, contributed to the following deficient practice, namely a failure to train, educate, and verify the competency of the nursing staff to ensure that they could appropriately assess and care for the resident population residing in the facility. Resident Identifiers: Resident #7 and Resident #45. Facility Census: 106.Findings Include:During a review of the records for Resident #7 and Resident #45 on 07/28/25 at approximately 1:00 PM it was revealed that the nursing staff were assessing and documenting the presence and patency of a non-existent AV access, and in addition failing to correctly assess the resident's dialysis accesses for patency, and infection as prescribed by the physician.a) Resident #7During an interview with Resident #7 on 07/28/25 at approximately 3:14 PM, resident stated that she had been on dialysis since 2016. The resident went on to state that her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observations the facility failed to provide residents a confidential way to file a written grievance. This findings had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 96. Findings included:a) Grievances On 07/30/25 at 1:40 PM during a Resident Council meeting it was revealed there was no confidential way to file a grievance without telling a staff member. On 07/30/25 at 2:15 PM an observation found no grievance forms readily available throughout the facility. The grievances forms were located at the front of the building behind closed non-handicap accessible double doors with a wander guard lock. During an interview, on 07/30/25 at 2:32 PM, the Administrator stated that the residents could get a form at the nurse's station by asking a staff member or at the front of the building behind the double doors. She also confirmed that most residents would need help getting through the doors to obtain the grievance forms.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report a five day follow up on allegations of abuse or neglect in a timely fashion to the appropriate state agencies. This was a random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #82. Facility census: 106.a) Resident #82 On 04/10/25, the facility shared an Initial Reporting of Allegations regarding alleged mental/verbal abuse to Resident #82 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 where she called resident an asshole. In an interview, 7/30/24 at 9:10 AM, the Administrator acknowledged the facility had failed to submit a five (5) day follow up to the appropriate state agencies. The administrator reported the facility's investigation into this incident, as well as any staff education, could not be found due to new ownership and files before 05/2025 were not available.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide dependent residents with the assistance needed for showers and personal hygiene. This was true for three (3) of four (4) residents sampled. Resident Identifiers: #24, #72 and #76. Facility Census: 106. Findings Includea) Resident #24During an interview on 07/29/2025 at 10:39 AM, Resident #76 stated that she was scheduled for showers on Tuesday and Friday. The resident explained that the availability of showers depended on staffing levels. She further stated that she was admitted on [DATE] and her first shower occurred on 07/15/25. Record review on 07/29/25 at approximately 10:45 AM revealed that Resident #24 had received a shower on 07/15/25 and 07/19/25. The record also revealed that Resident #24 refused showers on 07/22/25 and 07/25/25. Resident denies refusing showers. She stated, I'll take anything that I can get. b) Resident #72 During an interview with Resident #72 on 07/29/25 at approximately 12:06 PM, the resident stated that she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff were adequately educated and trained in the assessment and care of residents on dialysis. This failed practice had the potential to cause serious harm to any dialysis resident in the facility. The facility's failure to monitor and ensure that the nursing staff were accurately assessing resident's dialysis accesses, placed all residents on dialysis, currently residing in the facility at risk for serious bodily harm and/or death. These failures were determined to place all dialysis residents in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents sampled. Resident Identifiers: Resident #7 and Resident #45. Facility Census: 106. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 11:47 AM 07/31/25. The State Office approved the facility's POC at 2:27 PM on 07/31/25. After observation, staff interview, review of facility documentation, and record review determining the implementation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete Nurse Aides (NA) annual evaluations. This was true for two (5) of five (5) reviewed for staffing during the Long-Term Survey Process (LTCSP). Nurse Aide Identifiers: #70, #56, #10, #96, and #100. Facility census: 106. Findings included:a) A facility records review revealed, NA #70, NA #56, NA #10, NA #96 and NA#100 did not receive their 12-month evaluation. During an interview on 07/30/25 at 1:25 PM the Administrator confirmed there was no annual evaluations completed for NA #70, NA #56, NA #10, NA #96 and NA#100 . She stated that NA evaluations were something the facility needs to work on getting completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census: 106. In an interview with the Kitchen Manager #60, on 07/31/25 at 10:30AM, he stated his Food Handlers Certification had expired on 07/06/25 and stated he thought he had a 30 day grace period and that he andEmployee #19 were scheduled for a Food Handler's Course on 07/31/25. He also stated that he was a salaried worker and works at least 40 hours weekly. On 07/31/25 at 10:35AM, during a record review of kitchen staff certifications, it was verified that employees identified as #60 and #19 were working in the kitchen on expired Food Handlers Certifications. Both employees certifications expired on 07/06/25.A review of the employee kitchen schedule on 07/31/25 at 2:00PM verified that Employee #19 worked on July 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 16, 22, 24, 25, 27, 29, and 30, 2025 after his certification…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards. This is true for the Kitchen and Nourishment Room. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census 106.Findings included:a) On 07/28/25 at 11:27 AM, during Initial Brief Tour of Kitchen, with the Dietary Kitchen Manager #60 who acknowledged the following: -Walk In Cooler: 1 tray of sweet potato wedges and 1 tray of blended vegetables with no covering or labels and a package of celery left open to air with no labels or dates. -Reach In Cooler: 1 larger tray with salad cups and blue berry desert cups, and a small tray of pickle cups uncovered, unlabeled and undated.2 (two) wrapped sandwiches with unlabeled/undated. -Utensil drawers: all 4 utensil drawers were observed with all utensils scattered and not in the same direction. -Pots and Pans Lid Storage: It was observed that dirty pot lids were stored with clean lids on the storage rack. On 07/29/25 at 1:30 PM, during a Brief Tour of the 100 Hall Nourishment Room, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the vaccination status of each staff member (i.e., immunized or not). This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 106.During an interview on 07/30/25 at approximately 3:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the facility only had a total number of staff that received COVID vaccine. The facility did not have any documentation readily available that detailed which staff had received or had not received the COVID vaccine.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a dignified existence. Urinary catheter bags were found uncovered.This failed practice was a random opportunity of discovery. Resident Identifier: #115. Facility Census: 106Findings included:a) Resident #115On 07/28/25 at 2:05PM, during a resident interview, it was observed that Resident # 23's catheter bag did not have a bag cover. The uncovered catheter bag was placed on the side but near the foot of the bed which could be seen by any passerby in the hallway. During an interview, on 07/28/25 at 12:10 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #54 acknowledged the catheter bag was not covered.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs, by not ensuring Resident #90's call light was within her reach. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery.Resident identifier #90. Facility Census: 106.Findings include:a) Resident #90 During an interview with, Resident #90 on 07/30/25 at 12:13 PM, it was observed that Resident #90's call light was not within her reach. She stated she needed to get a nurse to lower the head of her bed and kept asking where her call light was. During an interview on 07/30/25 at 12:15 PM with the Nurse Aide (NA) #63, She acknowledged the call light was hanging on the bed frame behind the resident's mattress where the resident could not see it or reach it.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify a newly evident diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder on the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Resident Identifier: Resident identifier: #35. Facility Census:106. Findings Include:a) Resident #35 record review revealed an updated PASSAR dated 03/27/23, which did not identify any diagnosis of mental illness and stated, 'No Level II required.'The resident was diagnosed with bipolar disorder on 05/08/23. The facility failed to update the PASSAR and did not refer the resident for a Level II review, despite the newly evident disorder. During an interview with the Director of Social Services (DSS) #111 on 07/30/25 at 1:55 PM, she confirmed that she was aware that some PASSARs had not been updated. DSS #111 further stated that she was in the process of performing a whole-house review of PASSARs.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for one (1) of three (3) resident reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier: #35. Census 106.Findinbs included: a) Resident #35 During record review on 07/30/25 at approximately 12:10 PM, it was noted that Resident #35's initial PASSAR dated 05/12/22 did not identify any mental illness and stated, No Level II required. However, a review of the resident's diagnoses revealed a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder dated 01/27/22. During an interview with the Director of Social Services (DSS) #111 on 07/30/25 at 1:55 PM, she confirmed that she was aware that some PASSARs had not been updated. DSS #111 further stated that she was in the process of performing a whole-house review of PASSARs.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan that addressed the resident's diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), failed to incorporate knowledge about PTSD into care plans, failed to identify trauma triggers, and failed to implement interventions and practices to address those triggers and prevent re-traumatization. This was true of two (2) of two (2) residents sampled. Resident Identifiers: #24, #72. Facility Census:106.Findings Include a) Resident #24 Record review 07/29/2025 9:30 AM revealed that Resident #24 has a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) dated 07/10/25. A review of the resident's care plan revealed that PTSD was not addressed. In addition, the care plan failed to identify trauma triggers and failed to implement interventions and practices to address those triggers and prevent re-traumatization. b) Resident #72 During a review of records for Resident #72 on 07/29/2025 10:52 AM, it was noted that the resident had been diagnosed with chronic PTSD on 07/08/25. Further record review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to administer medications to meet the needs of the resident. This was true for two (2) of seven (7) residents sampled. In addition, the facility also failed to ensure that residents were weighed as per the physician's order. Resident Identifiers: #7, #45, and #103. Facility Census: 106. Findings Include: a) Resident #7 During an interview with Resident #7 on 07/28/25 at approximately 3:14 PM, the resident stated that she had been on dialysis since 2016. The resident went on to state that her dialysis access was a permacath. She further stated that she went to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Record review on 07/29/25 at 10:35 AM revealed a physician's order for: Sevelamer Carbonate Oral Tablet (Sevelamer Carbonate) Give 800 mg by mouth with meals every Tue, Thu, Sat, Sun for CKD (chronic kidney disease) Give 800 mg by mouth three times a day every Mon, Wed, Fri - give with meals b) Resident #45 During an interview on 07/30/25 at approximately at approximately 1:22 PM. Resident #45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to follow currently recognized standards of care in providing assessments and care of a resident's dialysis access. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents sampled. Resident Identifiers: Resident #7 and Resident #45. Facility Census:106.Findings Included:a) Resident #7Resident #7 had an order dated 06/19/25 by her physician stating, Dialysis: Site of AV shunt Check Bruit and Thrill every shift.During an interview with Resident #7 on 07/28/25 at approximately 3:14 PM, the resident stated that she had been on dialysis since 2016. The resident went on to state that her dialysis access was a permacath. She further stated that she went to dialysis on Mondays and Wednesdays and Fridays. She also stated that she had never had an Arteriovenous (AV) fistula or graft.Record review on 07/28/25 at approximately 3:30 PM revealed that Resident #7, did not have an AV access shunt. The record review supported the resident's comment that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation and staff interview the facility failed to have required members sign in at the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility Census: 106. Record review of the facility's documentation of QAA Meeting Agenda and Minutes revealed no sign-in sheets for staff that attended the meeting quarterly. The facility provided copies of meeting signature pages that were copied, and the dates were changed per month. During an Interview 08/04/25, at 1:38 PM the Administrator verified the required members did not sing in for the quarterly QAA meetings. The Administrator said they just copied a page of signatures and changed the date.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, The facility failed to maintain all patient care equipment in safe operating condition.This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers : #73 and #18 Facility Census: 106 On 07/28/25 at 3:10 PM, during a resident interview and facility walk through in room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that Resident #73 and #18's bathroom had a strong smell of urine with a puddle of water around the toilet base on the floor. On 07/30/25 at 10:29 AM during an interview with the Director of Nursing, and administrator in room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that a towel was wrapped around the base of the toilet, they acknowledged the toilet had a leak and caused a puddle of water on the bathroom floor.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents and staff. A portion of the wall in the laundry room had a black-like substance growing on it. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 106.Findings included:a) Laundry Room WallAn observation in the small area behind the dryers, made on 07/30/25 at approximately 10:50 AM, revealed what appeared to be a black-like substance at the bottom of the wall facing the right side of the dryers. On 07/20/25 at approximately 11:52 AM, an interview with Employee #75 verified this finding. This finding was also acknowledged by the facility administrator on 07/30/25 at approximately 11:59 AM.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-11 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information was posted in the facility accessible to residents and visitors. This has the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents. Facility census: 109. Findings include: a) Nurse staffing Observation of the nurse staffing folder at the front hallway with the admissions director (AD) #25 at 10:20 AM on 09/11/23, found there was no information regarding the nurse staff on duty for 09/11/23. At 5:10 PM on 09/11/23, the Director of Nursing (DON) said she had been made aware the staff posting was not completed for 09/11/23.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the care plans for three (3) of six (6) residents who were care planned for the potential for falls. Facility census: 109. Findings include: At 10:30 AM on 09/11/23, a tour of the 200 hallway with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #52 found three (3) residents on the 200 hallway who's call systems were in the floor and not within reach of the Residents who were in their beds. These three (3) Resident's were care planned for being at risk of falls. Each Resident had an intervention to have call bells within reach. a) Resident's #85 Review of the Residents electronic medical record found a care plan focus: At risk for falls due to poor safety awareness/cognitive deficits, revised on 03/08/23 The goal associated with the focus is: Minimize risk for injury related to falls, revised 03/14/23. Interventions included: Call bell in reach, initiated 03/08/23 b) Resident #9 Review of the electronic medical record found a care plan focus: At risk for falls due to myasthenia gravis, labile personality secondary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the call system was accessible to residents while in their bed. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 109. Findings include: At 10:30 AM on 09/11/23, a tour of the 200 hallway with the housekeeping supervisor (HS) #52 found six (6) residents on 200 hallway who's call systems were in the floor and not within reach of the Residents who were in their beds. HS #52 confirmed the following residents did not have access to the call light system: #10, #9, #85, #77, #70 and #75. At 5:10 PM on 09/13/23 the above findings were discussed with the Director of Nursing.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Five (5) residents eating in their rooms did not have hand hygiene when their lunch trays were served. Proper infection control practices were not followed during medication pass. Additionally, laundry was not processed and transported properly. These were random opportunities for discovery that had the potential to affect all residents residing in the building. Resident identifiers: #69, #83, #74, #48, #2, and #31. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Lunch tray distribution On 05/09/23 at 12:35 PM, lunch tray distribution was observed for residents eating in their rooms in the 400 hallway. Prior to the lunch tray service, the surveyor had been observing the residents and did not observe resident hand hygiene being performed. At 12:35 PM PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #200 was observed taking a lunch tray to Resident #69 who was dining in their room. Hand hygiene was not offered to Resident #69.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #31 had medication at her bedside. The medication was not secured and could be accessed by any wandering resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the care area of medication administration. Resident identifiers: #31, #51, #155, #40, and #156. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Medication pass On 05/09/23 at 8:00 AM, medication administration by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #134 to Resident #31 was observed. Resident #31 had an order for Flonase Suspension (Fluticasone Propionate), one (1) spray in both nostrils every 12 hours as needed for congestion. LPN #134 stated Resident #31 kept the Flonase bottle at her bedside. The Flonase spray was located on the resident's bedside table. LPN #134 administered Flonase spray to the resident and returned the bottle to the top of the resident's bedside table. Upon questioning, LPN #134 stated it was the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept in proper temperature controls in accordance with the accepted professional standards of practice. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 105. Findings Included: a) Medication Refrigerator On 05/09/23 at 10:25 AM, a tour of the South medication room was completed. During the tour, the medication refrigerator temperature logs were found to be incomplete. The following dates did not have the refrigerator temperatures logged: --03/31/23 AM and PM -- 04/20/23 PM -- 04/21/23 AM and PM -- 04/22/23 AM and PM -- 04/23/23 AM and PM -- 04/24/23 AM and PM -- 04/25/23 AM and PM -- 04/26/23 AM and PM -- 04/27/23 PM -- 04/28/23 AM and PM -- 04/29/23 AM and PM -- 04/30/23 AM and PM -- 05/01/23 AM and PM -- 05/02/23 AM -- 05/03/23 AM -- 05/04/23 AM and PM -- 05/05/23 AM and PM -- 05/06/23 AM -- 05/07/23 AM -- 05/08/23 AM On 05/09/23 at 10:30 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #22 confirmed the temperature logs for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered no temperatures were taken on the coolers or freezers, the threshold and freezer door was damaged. Water pitchers were not stored properly and the rice bin was not dated. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 05/08/23 at 11:22 AM, it was discovered the temperatures had not been taken on 05/07/23 on any of the freezers or refrigerators. The floor of the freezer and cooler were heavily soiled and needed to be cleaned. The threshold strip and the front of the metal door to the walk-in freezer were damaged and needed to be repaired. The rice bin in the storage room was not dated and pitchers and lids were stored rim down on a soiled shelf. In an interview with the Dietary Manager on 05/08/23 at 11:25 AM, they verified the temperatures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were incomplete for 16 of 27 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Additionally, one of these residents also had an inaccurate medical diagnosis recorded in the medical record. Resident identifiers: #72, #2, #24, #32, #355, #357, #64, #10, #4, #59, #80, #36, #37, #93, #38, and #305. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) 2021 POST form guidance The 2021 POST form guidance titled, Using the POST Form: Guidance for Health Care Professionals, 2021 edition, available on-line, stated the following: - Complete all sections in the demographic information section with the patient's information. - If the incapacitated patient's MPOA [medical power of attorney] representative or health care surrogate is unavailable at the time of form completion, this section can be signed by two witnesses for verbal confirmation of agreement from the patient's MPOA representative or health care surrogate. The form should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was explained to the resident and/or his representative in a form and manner that he or she could understand and decide whether or not to enter into such an agreement. This is true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility task of arbitration during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #98 and #205. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) admission staff interview During an interview on 05/10/23 at 10:47 AM, the Admissions Coordinator (AC)#96 was unable to explain the arbitration agreement. AC #96 stated both parties obtain a lawyer if there is an incident. If resident needs help finding a lawyer, the facility will help. When the surveyor told her this is not the definition of an arbitration agreement, AC #96 stated I am new to this position. The above information was discussed with the Administrator at 11:00 AM on 05/10/23. The facility administrator agreed this was not the definition of arbitration. b) Resident #98…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Resident #38's Health Care Surrogate (HCS) the opportunity to participate in a conversation with the Physician Assistant to discuss treatment risks and benefits and to choose the options he would prefer. This was true for one (1) of 27 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #38. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #38 Record review, completed on [DATE] at 2:23 PM, identified the following: --Resident #38 lacked capacity to make medical decisions --A Health Care Surrogate (HCS) form was on file and designated Resident #38's son as the legal decision maker. --A Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) was on file and indicated Resident #38 was to receive CPR [Cardiopulmonary resuscitation], selective treatments, and no artificial means of nutrition. The Certified Physician Assistant had discussed the POST form with Resident's spouse and had accepted verbal consent from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of serious bodily injuries were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made to the administrator of the facility and other officials (including the State Survey Agency and Adult Protective Services, in accordance with State law). The failed practice of reporting was discovered for three (3) of four (4) residents reviewed for falls with major injuries during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #49, #59, and #38. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #49 A medical record review on 05/10/23 for Resident #49, revealed on 01/24/23 resident had a fall, which resulted in a major injury. Resident suffered a right distal femoral fracture. The record did not indicate the serious bodily injury had been reported to any of the required State entities. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on 05/10/23 at 1:05 PM, confirmed they were unable to locate any Abuse and Neglect reporting made to the State Survey Agency or Adult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the bed hold policy during two (2) transfers to an acute care facility. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalization. Resident Identifier: #94. Facility Census: 105. Findings Included: a1) Resident #94 On 05/08/23 at 1:36 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #94. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 04/05/23 due to nausea and vomiting with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. Upon reviewing the transfer paperwork, the review found no bed hold policy had been given to the resident. On 05/09/23 at 2:19 PM, the Administrator stated we couldn't find the bed hold paperwork. No further information was obtained during the long-term care survey. a2) Resident #94 On 05/08/23 at 2:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #94. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 04/20/23 due to an elevated heart rate and low oxygen saturation with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #51 regarding an active diagnoses. This was true for one (1) of 27 residents reviewed during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifier: #51. Facility Census: 105. Findings Included: a) Resident #51 On 05/08/23 at 2:06 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #51. The record review found the resident had a fall with a major injury resulting in a right femur fracture. The MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/22/23 modification of a significant change did not list the right femur fracture as a diagnosis. On 05/10/23 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator stated, the diagnosis has been corrected on the MDS. No further information was obtained during the long-term survey process. .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one (1) of 27 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifier: #102. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #102 Review of Resident #102's comprehensive care plan showed the following focus written on 04/14/23, Has/At risk for respiratory impairment related to trach [tracheostomy], respiratory failure, pulmonary emboli, pneumonia. An intervention was added on 04/17/23 for Additional same size/type trach #6 and obturator at bedside at all times. Ambu bag, suction canister and catheters in room at all times. On 05/09/23 at 1:30 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #22 was asked to locate the emergency equipment in Resident #102's room. RN #22 could not locate an Ambu bag in Resident #102's room. An Ambu bag is a device that provides ventilation for a resident with a tracheostomy who is not breathing or not breathing adequately. RN #22 stated there was an Ambu bag on the emergency cart, but she would obtain one specifically for Resident #102's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise a person-centered, comprehensive care plan, to include changes in respiratory care. This was true for one (1) of 27 residents' care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #19 A medical record review on 05/09/23 revealed orders for oxygen to be received at two (2) liters per minute (lpm) via a nasal cannula, with a start date of 12/13/22. The current care plan had not been revised and indicated Resident #19 was receiving oxygen at four (4) lpm as needed since 12/01/21. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 05/10/23 at 12:31 PM, confirmed Resident #19 was now receiving two (2) lpm of oxygen via nasal cannula and the care plan had not been revised. .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure a physician order for pain medication was correctly followed for Resident #37. This failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for pain. Additionally, the facility to ensure a medication patch was dated and signed when applied to Resident #27. Resident identifiers: #37 and #27. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #37 A medical record review, completed on 05/09/23 at 11:27 AM, revealed the following physician order, dated 02/28/23 at 1:00 PM, HYDROcodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 5-325 MG. Give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain 5-10. Review of the March 2023, April 2023, and May 2023 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed the following dates and times the medication was not given in accordance with the physician's order: --03/06/23 at 5:17 PM the medication was given with a pain level of 0. --03/07/23 at 10:37 AM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure eternal feeding care was provided according to professional standards of practice. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of tube feeding. Resident Identifier: #357. Facility Census: 105. Findings Included: a) Resident #137 Upon the initial interview on 05/08/23 at 11:50 AM, Resident #357's bottle of Glucerna was found not dated upon administration. On 05/08/23 at 11:53 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #22 confirmed the Glucerna bottle was not dated upon administration. On 05/09/23 at 10:14 AM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the Glucerna bottle should have been dated upon administration. No further information was obtained during the long-term survey process. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was true for three (3) of four (4) residents reviewed for respiratory care services. Resident #19 and #355, did not have respiratory equipment stored properly and Resident #4's oxygen tubing was not dated. Resident identifiers #19, #355, and #4. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #19 During an observation on 05/08/23 at 1:45 PM, it was discovered the mask for the Average Volume Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS) Trilogy machine was not bagged properly after using. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #99 on 05/08/23 at 1:45PM, verified the AVAPS Trilogy mask was not stored properly. b) Resident #355 Upon the initial interview with Resident #355 on 05/08/23 at 1:18 PM, the bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP) mask was found laying on the night stand without being stored in a respiratory bag. On 05/08/23 at 1:20 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #22 confirmed the BIPAP mask was not stored correctly in a respiratory bag. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the physician and or designee failed to respond to a Medication Regimen Review (MRR). This was discovered for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #19 During a medical record review on 05/10/23, it was discovered the MRR completed by the pharmacist on 11/25/22 recommended a pulse be taken before Metoprolol was to be administered. A review of the order on 05/10/23 at 10:33 AM, revealed Metoprolol Tartrate 25 milligrams (mg), give 12.5 mg two (2) times daily for hypertension, had no reference for a pulse to be taken before administering the medication. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 05/10/23 at 10:33 AM, verified the recommendation by the pharmacist on 11/25/22, had no response from the physician and or designee. .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility must provide special eating equipment for residents who need special equipment. This deficient practice was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident identifier: #2. Facility census: 105. Findings included: a) Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's physicians' orders showed an order written on 02/22/23 for a two-handled cup with flat lid with meals. On 05/10/23 at 7:55 AM, Resident #2 was observed eating breakfast in her room. Her tray had a cup with no handles. Nursing Aide (NA) #27 confirmed Resident #2 was supposed to have a two-handled cup and went to the kitchen to get one for the resident. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' dignity. The residents' indwelling urinary catheter bedside urine collection bags did not have privacy covers for Resident #260, Resident #55, and Resident #102. Additionally, Resident #55 was left in a bed in the hallway without being covered. Resident identifiers: #260, #55, #102. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #260 During observation on 02/14/22 at 12:00 PM, Resident #260 was noted to be resting in bed. An indwelling urinary catheter bedside urine collection bag was noted to be hanging on the bedside rail. The catheter collection bag did not have a privacy cover, which allowed the urine to be viewed by anyone walking past the room. During a second observation on 02/14/22 at 4:02 PM, Resident #260's indwelling urinary catheter urine collection bag continued to be uncovered. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #38 stated Resident #260 was admitted to the facility with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of twenty-six (26) residents advance directives were communicated to staff in a clear and concise manner to allow staff to immediately determine the resident's code status in the event of an emergency. Resident identifiers: #411, #44, and #106. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #411 On [DATE] at 3:02 PM, observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #38, found two (2) pink sheets of paper in the front of the paper chart; one (1) which said Do not Resuscitate (DNR) and one (1) that said full code. LPN #38 confirmed there was no indication the resident or a resident representative had completed any paperwork to determine if the resident wished to formulate an advance directive or had an existing advance directive. LPN #38 said usually there is an orange card in the chart signed by the physician after discussion with the resident or responsible party. There was no information in the medical record indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #106 and #107 had a clean, safe and well maintained bathroom. In addition, Resident #106's bed linens were not clean, and the facility did not have an adequate number of wash clothes for daily use. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #106, #107. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #106 During an interview on 02/14/22 at 2:22 PM, Resident #106 stated, They [facility staff] need to fix the toilet sprayer, it leaks, and the bathroom floor is always wet that's why we have the towels laying there in front of the toilet. The Resident further stated, And look here [resident pointed to bed sheet] this hasn't been changed in a week. The Resident's bottom bed sheet was visibly soiled with a dark brown dried substance. On 2/14/22 at 2:30 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, resident review, and staff interview, the facility to develop and implement the comprehensive care plan for three (3) of 26 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. The facility failed to develop the comprehensive care plan in the area of anxiety and anti-anxiety medications for Resident #93 and in the area of pain for Resident #42. The facility failed to implement the care plan in the area of non-pressure wound treatments for Resident #410. Resident identifiers: #93, #410, #42. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #93 Review of Resident #93's medical records revealed a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The resident was receiving two (2) medications, Trazodone and Buspar, for anxiety. Review of Resident #93's comprehensive care plan did not show a focus related to anxiety and anti-anxiety medications. During an interview on 02/15/22 at 2:52 PM, Social Worker (SW) #36 confirmed the resident was not care planned for anxiety. SW #36 stated she would develop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident (R) #212's antibiotic was not administered for three days. The interdisciplinary team failed to coordinate services for R #49 between the facility and contracted Hospice services and ensure Hospice visitation records were included in the medical record. Physician orders for specialized treatments and lab work were not completed for Residents #55, #410 and #90. This is true for five (5) of 26 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #212, #49, #55, #410, and #90. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident (R) #212 During an interview on 02/14/22 at 1:45 PM, R #212 reported she did not receive her antibiotics the first three days in the facility. A review of the medical record on 02/14/22, confirmed R #212 was admitted to the facility from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on staff interview, resident interview, and observation, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to ensure call lights were answered timely and room changes were completed in a timely manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents and was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #107, #55, #212, #69. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #107 During an interview on 02/14/22 at 12.25 PM Resident # 107 stated the nighttime staff has smart mouths and they have a hard time answering bells, its worse at night, especially on the weekends. The Resident stated, I help my roommate to the rest room because they won't. Then they get hateful with me and tell me to get out of bathroom and leave. b) Resident #55 On 02/15/22 at 10:20 PM, Resident #55 was observed to be laying in a hospital bed, in the North side of the building at the end of the 400-hallway facing the exit door. The hospital gown only came down to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services at a professional standard of care. Medications were not administered as scheduled. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of staff. Resident identifiers: #76, #8, #44, and #83. Facility census 108. Findings included: a) Resident #76 Resident #76 was located behind the double zipper wall in the COVID-19 unit. A review of the facility, Medication Admin Audit Report dated 02/13/22 revealed the following medications were administrated five hours late by Licensed Practical Nurse #2. The scheduled time was for 9:00 AM and was administration time was 2:00 PM: *Risperdal, give 1 tablet two times a day for anxiety, paranoid schizophrenia. *Carvedilol, give 1 tablet two times a day for Congestive heart failure. *Eliquis, give 1 tablet two times a day for atrial flutter (an irregular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide routine and prescribed pharmaceuticals for residents during the daily medication administration and failed to maintain complete and accurate narcotic records. This was found for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed during medication pass but has the potential to affect all residents. Resident identifiers: #39 and #95. Facility census: 108. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #39 During an observation of medication administration on 02/15/22 at 8:10 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #27 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 were unable to find a multi-dose vial of Calcium Carbonate - Vitamin D 500-200 milligrams (mg) per unit to match the physician's order. LPN #6 stated the facility does not normally carry the dose ordered and RN #27 reported she would hold the medication until she could clarify the order. A follow up interview with RN #27 at 12:00 PM on 02/15/22 confirmed the physician was contacted and the order was changed to match the facility stock. A review of the medical record on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. The initial kitchen tour found a dirty drip pan, food debris on the floor of the walk-in cooler and freezer, and missing floor tiles along the wall in the dish room. The flour in the flour bin was not dated after opening. These failed practices had the potential to affect a limited number of residents receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During a kitchen tour on 02/14/22 at 11:30 AM, it was discovered the stove drip pan was dirty and the walk-in cooler/freezer had food debris on the floors. There were missing floor tiles along the wall in the dish room and the flour in the flour bin was not dated after opening. An interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 02/14/22 at 11:40 AM, verified the floors of the walk-in cooler and freezer were dirty and needed to be cleaned. In addition, the DM also agreed the drip pan needed to be cleaned, the missing floor tiles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee had a system for monitoring departmental performance data routinely in order to identify deviations in performance and adverse events. The facility failed to identify quality deficiencies of which they should been aware of, related to antibiotic stewardship. This had the potential to affect all resident who resident at the facility. Facility census: 108. Findings included: Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan found the following: Elements of the QAPI design and scope include: Clinical care - monitoring and evaluating performance and opportunities for improvement in areas such as Quality Measure performance, incidents/accidents, infection control and antibiotic stewardship, metric analysis. etc . Antibiotic Stewardship Facility Policy, Antibiotic Stewardship revision date: 12/2016. *Orientation, training and education of staff will emphasize the importance of antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Appropriate hand hygiene was not performed during medication administration. Additionally, proper infection control practices were not followed when emptying a urine collection bag. Resident identifiers: #102, #52, #46, #39, #95. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Residents #52 and #46 On 02/15/22 at 8:26 AM, medication administration by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #37 was observed. LPN #37 administered medications to Resident #52. LPN #37 prepared the medications at the medication cart in the hallway and carried the medications into the resident's room for the resident to take. After leaving Resident #52's room, LPN #37 then prepared Resident #46's medications at the medication cart in the hallway and carried the medications into the resident's room for the resident to take. LPN #37 did not perform hand hygiene between medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for seven (7) of seven (7) residents reviewed. Seven (7) residents received antibiotics in absence of the appropriate screening criteria need to determine the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy. Resident identifiers: #317, #38, #49, #314, #45, #315, and #27. Facility Census 108. Findings included: Facility Policy, Antibiotic Stewardship revision date: 12/2016. *Orientation, training and education of staff will emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship and will include how inappropriate use of antibiotics affects individual residents and the overall community. *Appropriate indications for use of antibiotics include: -Minimum criteria met for clinical definition of active infection or suspected sepsis -Pathogen susceptibility, based on culture and sensitivity, to antimicrobial. -The staff and practitioner will document the criteria that support the suspicion in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to designate an infection preventionist who has completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents that currently reside in the facility. Facility census 108. Finding included: During an interview on 02/14/2022 at 12:05 PM, Infection Preventionist (IP) #26 stated he completed the training from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) models. IP #26 was asked for proof of certification of completion. IP #26 was asked to provide the certificate of training multiple times: On 02/15/22 at 9:30 AM. On 02/15/22 at 3:22 PM. On 02/16/22 at 4:10 PM. At the conclusion of the survey IP #26 had not provided a Certificate. On 02/16/22 at 3:33 PM, the Administrator was aware IP #26 needed to provide a copy of his infection prevention certificate. .

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to vaccinate eligible residents with the influenza and/or the pneumococcal vaccine(s), for five (5) of five (5) residents reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #102, #3, #313, #8 and #24. Facility census: 108 Findings included: a) Policy Review Record review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza Vaccine, revised October of 2019, showed that between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents. b) Resident #102 Review of Resident #102's medical record showed it did not contain documentation to show the Resident was offered the required vaccinations for pneumonia and/or influenza. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview at 11:00 AM on 02/15/2022, the Infection Preventionist (IP) was asked for the documentation regarding the pneumonia and/or influenza vaccine. On 02/15/22 at 1:53 PM, IP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-16 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — pattern
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to inform residents, their representatives, and families by 5:00 PM the next calendar day following the occurrence of each a single confirmed infection of COVID-19. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents that currently reside at the facility. Facility census 108. Findings included: During an interview on 02/14/22 at 12:05 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) #26 when asked how the residents/responsible parties was notified about the new positive cases of COVID-19? The most recent outbreak began on 01/04/22 with the most recent positive case occurring on 02/13/22. IP #26 said the social worker handled that and he was not sure how the notification was completed. On 02/15/22 at 11:30 AM, Social Worker (SW) #36 said she calls the families to let them know if their family member test positive for COVID-19. SW #36 confirmed other residents/families were not notified of each new positive case. SW #36 said that if she talked to a family member, she would write a note about it in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations of needs for Resident #55 during a room change. Resident #55 was left in the hallway for an extended period of time without a call light and bed linens. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #55. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #55 Resident #55 On 02/15/22 at 10:20 PM, Resident #55 was observed to be laying in a hospital bed, in the North side of the building at the end of the 400-hallway facing the exit door with only a hospital gown on that came down to Resident's mid-thigh. The Resident had no blanket or sheet covering him. The Resident's Foley catheter was hanging from the bottom of the bed without a dignity cover with the tubing running parallel between both legs. Resident #55 was not placed in room [ROOM NUMBER] until 11:04 PM. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 was asked why the resident was in hallway? LPN #14 said they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-16 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to display the most recent State inspection survey results in a readily accessible area frequented by residents. It was discovered the State inspection survey was placed in an area not easily accessible to residents. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Accessible survey results During an observation on 02/16/22 at 10:50 AM, it was discovered the State inspection was not located in an area easily accessible to residents. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on 02/16/22 at 10:50 AM, verified the Survey book was not located in an area easily accessible to residents. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve a residents grievance/concern. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #86. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #86 On 02/14/22 at 1:22 PM, the resident said nursing assistant (NA) #76 is very bossy to her. She tells me the room is too hot and she turns off my heat. She only works when, the State comes in. She wants to boss everybody including me. I have been in many disagreements with her. She talks too loud and I tell her, Don't talk so loud to me, I can hear. She said, I have told other people about her, and nothing is done although everyone agrees she's a problem. Due to her position here, she can't be fired. Review of the grievance/concern forms on 02/15/22 at 12:05 PM, found no written verification the resident had voiced any concern regarding NA #76. On 02/15/22 at 12:18 PM, the resident's concerns with NA #76 were communicated to the administrator. On 02/16/22 at 2:25 PM, the administrator said she had not talked to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure for reporting potential allegations of abuse and or neglect. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #261. Facility census: 108. Finding included: a) Resident #261 Review of the facility's, Abuse Policy, found The facility ensures that any incidents of substantiated abuse are reported and analyzed and the appropriate correct, remedial or disciplinary action occurs, in accordance with applicable local, state or federal law . On 02/16/22 at 8:39 AM, while reviewing another complaint, a copy of an email was found from a Department of Health and Human Resource (DHHR) worker, emailed to the Director of Nursing (DON) at the facility on 10/05/21 at 7:31 AM, regarding Resident #261. The email is as follows: Good morning (Name of DON.) Here is the intake as received by my office. Please respond and provide any documents to discount these contentions- care plan for falls etc. Reporter states that (name of Resident #261) is in the Fairmont Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #261. Facility census: 108. Findings include: a) Resident #261 Review of the facility's, Abuse Policy, found The facility ensures that any incidents of substantiated abuse are reported and analyzed and the appropriate correct, remedial or disciplinary action occurs, in accordance with applicable local, state or federal law . On 02/16/22 at 8:39 AM, while reviewing another complaint, a copy of an email was found from a Department of Health and Human Resource (DHHR) worker, sent to the Director of Nursing (DON) at the facility on 10/05/21 at 7:31 AM, regarding Resident #261. The email is as follows: Good morning (Name of DON.) Here is the intake as received by my office. Please respond and provide any documents to discount these contentions- care plan for falls etc. Reporter states that (name of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the timely completion and transmittal of a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #2. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical record showed the resident was discharged home on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record, showed an Entry MDS assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 10/05/21, an admission MDS assessment with ARD 10/11/21, and a Five (5) Day Medicare Assessment with ARD 10/11/21. No Discharge MDS was located in the medical record. During an interview on 02/15/22 at 1:37 PM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #2 did not have a Discharge MDS completed. On 02/15/22 at 2:05 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated she completed a Discharge MDS for Resident #2 today. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey. .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised when changes occurred or additional information should have been elicited. This had the potential to affect two (2) of 26 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #5, #90. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #5 On 02/14/22 at 1:39 PM, Resident #5 was observed following staff members and visitors down the hallway, asking them to take her with them. The resident was repeatedly saying, What are we going to do? Review of Resident #5's comprehensive care plan showed the following focus, Repetitive physical movements related to cognitive impairment /dementia. The focus was initiated on 09/10/2018. An intervention initiated on 09/10/2018 was to Illicit [sic] family input for best approaches. During an interview on 02/16/22 at 11:17 AM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator agreed Resident #5's comprehensive care plan had not been revised since 2018…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible. Medications were left unattended on a bedside table belonging to Resident # 313. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #313. Facility census 108. Findings included: a) Resident #313 On 02/14/22 at 1:57 PM, an observation revealed medications were left unattended on a bedside table belonging to Resident #313. There was a green paste like substance in a medication cup. Resident #313 said it was Icy Hot. (The manufactures guidelines for Icy Hot note: may cause harm if swallowed, call the poison control center or doctor), Two (2) bottles of eye drops for glaucoma Pilocarpine HCL Solution. (The side effects could chest pain, diarrhea, fast slow or irregular heartbeat, headache, nausea or vomiting, shortness of breath and stomach aches). Dorzolamide (Side effects: bloody nose, burning, crawling, itching, numbness, prickling.) Nasal spray- Oxymetazoline (overdose symptoms may include drowsiness, slow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This failed practice was true for two (2) out of two (2) residents reviewed for catheter care. Resident identifiers: #102 and #260. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #102 During the initial tour on 02/14/22 at 12:26 PM, it was noted the collection Foley bag and tubing were lying on the floor under the wheelchair of Resident #102. Licensed Practical Nurse #14 came in room and adjusted the collection bag to the back of the wheelchair. In addition, the Foley collection bag did not have a privacy cover. Observation of catheter care with Nurse Aide #47 on 02/16/22 at 2:30 PM, revealed the following: NA #47 prepared a pan of water, obtained two wash cloths and one towel. NA #47 did not use the folding technique with the washcloth. NA#47 initiated peri care by wiping down the right side of the groin then initiated a downward stoke on the left side of the groin,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Facility staff incorrectly documented the percentage of food consumed for meals. Resident identifier: #692. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #692 Observation on 02/14/22 at 1:39 PM, found the resident was in her room, up in her wheelchair with the noon meal on the bed-side table in front of her wheelchair. The residents' fork was lying on her plate with a small corner (one bite) of lasagna cut off, still on the plate. The residents' tray also contained a vegetable blend, bread, and strawberry shortcake. None of the other items on her plate had been touched. When asked, the resident said she did not want to eat and didn't want anything else because she wouldn't eat it either. I'm just not hungry. The residents' tray was picked up from her room and placed on the dirty food cart. On 02/15/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of dialysis was monitored for any possible complications after receiving dialysis treatments at an outpatient certified dialysis facility. Resident #86. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #86 During an interview with the resident about dialysis care and treatments on 02/14/22 at 1:26 PM, the resident said facility staff don't always check on her after she returns from dialysis. She stated staff don't take her vital signs when she returns. She said, just like today, I came back and handed my papers to the nurse at the desk and nothing has been done yet. (Resident stated name of Licensed Practical Nurse #38) and said the nurse still hasn't taken my blood pressure, temperature or pulse and I have been back for an hour now. Record review found an order dated 10/17/21 for: Dialysis Days M-W-F (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday) at (Name of dialysis center, telephone number, and address); pickup time 7 am for chair time 740 am…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-16 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff have the basic competencies needed to provide care to a resident with psychosocial disorders. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for choices. Resident identifier: #22. Facility census: 108. Findings included: a) Resident #22 On 02/14/22 at 12:27 PM, the resident was in her room crying. When asked why she was tearful, the resident said, Everything has been taken away from me. The resident was unable to state specifics, she just kept crying and saying when she came here she doesn't have any say into what happens to her. In addition, the resident said a nurse that works here said, I probably don't have long to live anyway. Record review found the resident does have a diagnosis of depression and receives Lexapro Tablet, 10 MG, an antidepressant, daily. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/21 noted the resident scored 10 on her brief interview for mental status (BIMS). A score of 10 indicates the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean environment. A broken outlet cover in a resident room with visible wiring showing and large hole in a over-the-bed table were observed . This was a random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect a limited number of residents that currently reside at the facility. Resident identifier: #8. Facility census: 89. Findings included: a) wall outlet On 02/14/2022 at 11:45 AM, it was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a broken outlet cover on the wall between the two beds, without any furniture in front of the outlet. The outlet had visible wires showing and was approximately 12 inches from the floor and easily accessible. This was verified with Nurse Aide #45. b) Resident #8 On 02/14/22 at 1:44 PM, observation revealed a large hole measuring approximately 5 inches by 4 inches on the right corner of the over- the- bed table. This was verified with Nurse Aide #45.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,959 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,959 — penalty dated 2025-07-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STALLION WV II HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/24/2025
LRANS FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/24/2025
STALLION WV TBD II HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/24/2025
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/24/2025
GOTTLIEB, REFOELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2025
GOTTS CONSULTING WV LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/24/2025
BHARTI, SANJAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2025
DAVIS, DOMINIQUEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense26% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 5%Other / private 16%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$341per resident / day
operating cost
$10,379per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$397per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515189. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next