Majestic Care of Manchin
401 Guffey Street, Fairmont, WV 26554 · Government - State · 41 certified beds · (304) 363-2500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.7% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.8% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.9% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.2% | 15.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.7% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.1% | 22.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.6% | 13.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 1.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.01 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.01 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for resident Room identifiers: #218, #212, and #205. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Census: 25. Findings include: a) Upon survey entrance on 04/21/25 at 1:05PM, the following issues were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom areas: -black scuff marks on backside of bathroom door, - Rips and tears in the bathroom dry in the paint on right side wall under the paper towel dispenser. b) Upon survey entrance on 04/21/25 at 1:05PM, the following issues were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom areas: -Tissue holder right side was missing, - Cracks in caulking around the sink, -Black scuffmarks on the back side of bathroom door. c) Upon survey entrance on 04/21/25 01:05 PM the following issues were observed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-bathroom areas: -Drywall in the bathroom to the left of the sink above soap dispenser tear approx. 2 inches wide, -Tissue holder right side was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Medical Record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for non-pharmacological interventions and implement a toileting care plan for two (2) residents. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who were reviewed for care plans. Resident identifiers: #14, #4, #20. Facility census: 25. Findings included: a) Resident #14 Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of anxiety, memory impairment and bewilderment secondary to Bipolar I Disorder, substance induced mood disorder and Major Neurocognitive disorder. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be assessed. A review of medications on 04/22/25 at 1:17 PM found the following: Divaproex (Depakote) for bipolar affective disorder; Sertraline for depression and Zyprexa for Bipolar disorder order. These medications were monitored through a psychiatric consultation and approved by the attending physician. The behaviors of refusing care and cussing at staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #22 was found to have a razor in his bathroom. For residents #25 and #27, Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) revealed the facility failed to to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and elopements. For Resident #27 the facility staff failed to respond to a wander guard alarm. During Resident #5's medication administration, the medication cart was left unlocked. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #22, #25, #27, and #5. Facility Census: 25. Findings include: a) Resident #22 04/21/25 01:29 PM During facility entrance observation of Resident #22's room revealed a blue razor was found in the bathroom on top of the paper towel dispenser. On 04/21/25 at 1:30 PM, after an interview with Nurse Aide (NA) #25, the NA removed the razor and stated it was not supposed to be in the resident's room. In an interview with the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to Store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect multiple residents of the facility. Facility census 25. Findings included: Upon initial visit to the kitchen on 04/21/25 at 12:38 PM the following was observed in the refrigerators: -Staff food items consisting of bowls of butter and a bottle of flavored coffee creamer were found stored with facility refrigerated food supply. -Cooked hamburger labeled and dated to expire 04/20/25 still in fridge on 04/21/25. -boiled eggs expiration date of 04/15/25 still in the fridge 4/21/25 -Grape jelly labeled with a label of open date of 03/31/24 with no expiration date -Large bottle of Salsa dated and labeled as Iced tea -Large bowl of coleslaw not completely covered was exposed open to air -Stacked trays of fruit bowls were unlabeled Freezer: -Hash browns opened, rewrapped and out of box unlabeled Pantries: -Opened bread loaves unlabeled -Opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 25. Findings Include: a) On 04/22/25 11:20 AM, during the kitchen food temperature testing, observation revealed the burner knobs were not on the stove. The kitchen staff was preparing lunch causing the grilled cheeses to burn. The cook stated the grill was set too high and was unable to adjust the grill temperatures until he replaced the missing knobs with control knobs from the other burners to adjust the grill temperatures. This left the other burners without control knobs. On 04/22/25 at 11:25 AM, In an interview with the facility cook he stated the knobs fell off and were probably under the stove somewhere. During an interview with the dietary manager on 04/22/25 at 11:30AM, she acknowledged the missing knobs and stated they had probably fallen off and guessed they were underneath the stove.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy and confidentially for Resident #5 during medication administration. Resident identifier: #5. Facility Census: 25. Findings include: a) Resident #5 On 04/24/25 at 7:23 AM, an observation was made during medication administration completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #22. Upon entering Resident #5's room, RN #22 left the computer screen unlocked with access to Resident #5's medical record. On 04/24/25 at 7:27 AM, RN #22 acknowledged the computer screen was unlocked. On 04/24/25 at 7:40 AM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the computer screen should have been locked.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was free from restraints. This was true for one (1) of the two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of falls. Resident Identifier: #4. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 2:45 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4 regarding multiple falls. The review found the resident had a physician's order dated 06/21/24 for a self releasing seat belt for improve safety/cues to resident upon standing attempts to help with fall prevention. However, the physician's order did not contain the information to release the restraint every two (2) hours. Upon further review, the care plan under the focus area of at risk for falls related to past history of falls, did list the self releasing seat belt as an intervention. On 04/23/25 at 2:37 PM, Resident #4 was sitting in a wheelchair in the unit lobby with the self releasing seat belt in place. Registered Nurse (RN) #22 was asked to assist with a demonstration of the resident releasing the seat belt. RN #22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the use of restraints. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of falls. Resident identifier: #4. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 2:45 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4 regarding multiple falls. The review found the resident had a physician's order dated 06/21/24 for a self-releasing seat belt for improve safety/cues to resident upon standing attempts to help with fall prevention. However, the physician's order did not contain the information to release the restraint every two (2) hours. Upon further review, the care plan under the focus area of at risk for falls related to history of falls, did list the self-releasing seat belt as an intervention. On 04/23/25 at 2:37 PM, Resident #4 was sitting in a wheelchair in the unit lobby with the self-releasing seat belt in place. Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan regarding restraint use for Resident #4 and actual skin breakdown for Resident #12. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #4 and #12. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 2:45 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4 regarding multiple falls. The review found the resident had a physician's order dated 06/21/24 for a self releasing seat belt for improve safety/cues to resident upon standing attempts to help with fall prevention. The care plan does indicate an intervention of the self releasing seat belt under the focus area of risk for falls due to a history of falls; however, the care plan was not revised to indicate the self releasing seat belt is a restraint. An interview was held with the Administrator on 04/23/25 at 4:15 PM. The Administrator did confirm the self releasing seat belt was not identified as a restraint on the care plan. b) Resident #12 On 04/21/25 at 4:13 PM, a record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for toileting schedules for Resident #4 and Resident #20. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #4 and #20. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 9:20 AM, a toileting sheet was observed hanging on Resident #4's bathroom door. The toileting sheet was scheduled for every two (2) hours. The toileting sheet was noted for 04/19/25 through 04/25/25. No documentation was found from 8:00 AM through 10:00 PM. A physician's order dated 01/16/25 stated, Will ask resident if they need to void q2h (every two hours) while awake to help with toileting needs. (Typed as written.) On 04/22/25 at 9:30 AM, an interview with held with Registered Nurse (RN) #22. RN #22 stated, the resident is on a toileting program. On 04/22/25 at 11:26 AM, the Administrator confirmed the physician's order was not followed regarding the toileting schedule b) Resident #20 On 04/22/25 at 9:23 AM, a toileting sheet was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the daily staff posting. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 25. a) Daily Staff Posting On 04/22/25 at 9:00 AM, an observation of the daily staff posting which was hanging at the nurses' station was made. The staff posting dated 04/22/25 did not have the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM shift completed with the census, nursing hours, actual nursing hours worked and staffing totals. On 04/22/25 at 9:12 AM, the Administrator was at nurses' station. The Administrator was notified the posting was not completed. The Administrator confirmed the posting was not complete.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and complete record for Resident #4's hospice notes and a nursing assessment regarding contractures for Resident #12. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #4 and #12. Facility Census: 25. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 04/22/25 at 8:45 AM, a review of the hospice notes was completed for Resident #4. During the review, Resident #9's hospice notes were found in Resident #4's medical record. On 04/22/25 at 8:50 AM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the wrong resident's notes were scanned into Resident #4's medical record. The Administrator stated, We will get this taken care of immediately. b) Resident #12 On 04/22/25 at 4:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #12. The review found two (2) nursing assessments, dated 03/16/25 and 04/06/25, did not indicate the presence of bilateral hand contractures. On 04/22/25 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the nursing assessments were incorrect.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards over which it had control. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 32. Findings included: a) Sharps Container Overflowing with Disposable Razors in Shower Room Sharps is a term for objects with sharp points or edges that can puncture or cut skin, such as needles, syringes, lancets, and razors. Sharps disposal containers are made from rigid puncture-resistant plastic with leak-resistant sides and bottom, and a tight-fitting, puncture-resistant lid with an opening to accommodate depositing a sharp but not large enough for a hand to enter. Sharps disposal containers are marked with a line to indicate when the container is about three-fourths (3/4) full, and it is time to dispose of the container. On 11/06/23 at 12:45 PM, a random observation made during a facility tour revealed a red, five (5) quart Sharps disposable container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to respect the Residents right to be treated with respect and dignity. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #27. Facility Census: #32 Findings included: a) Resident #27 On 11/06/23 at 11:40 AM observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 assisting Resident #27 with her noon meal and was standing while feeding her. This was confirmed immediately with LPN #5, at which time and she told a co-worker, I need a chair. This was confirmed with the Administrator on 11/06/23 at 11:45 AM who stated you are right, she should be sitting.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct an accurate initial minimum data set (MDS) assessment. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #32. Facility census: 32. Findings included: a) Resident (R) #32 Review of the medical record on 11/07/23 revealed R#32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a terminal diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. The admission medications included the following psychotropic medications: Buspirone (antianxiety), Effexor (antidepressant) and Seroquel (antipsychotic). The pharmacy review dated 10/23/23 notes no recommendations. The admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/25/23 identified the administration of an antipsychotic drug and noted a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was last attempted on 10/23/23 per physician documentation. On 11/07/23 at 9:18 AM, MDS Nurse #3 confirmed R#32's MDS was incorrectly coded under section N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident 10's Quarterly MDS was submitted during the prescribed timeframe. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 32. Finding Included: a) MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual Review of the MDS 3.0 RAI Manual (October 2019) Chapter 5 Submission and Correction of the MDS Assessments, subsection 5.2 revealed in part the following: Assessment Schedule: An OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) assessment (comprehensive or Quarterly) is due every quarter unless the resident is no longer in the facility. There must be no more than 92 days between OBRA assessments. b) Resident #10 A brief record review, completed on 11/08/23 at 12:38 PM revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The last submitted MDS was a Significant Change MDS which was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This was true for three (3) of 15 sample residents. Resident #1 was coded for a wrong diagnosis, Resident #16's assessment indicated there was a urinary tract infection (UTI) and Resident #32 had an incorrect gradual dose reduction (GDR) date. Resident identifiers: #1, #16, and #32. Facility census: 32. Findings included: a) Resident #1 A medical record review on 11/07/23 indicated the MDS assessment with an Assesment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/02/23 had Section I coded wrong for pneumonia under Active Diagnoses. During and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/07/23 at 9:57 AM, reported the MDS assessment had been coded wrong and Resident #1 had not had a diagnosis of pneumonia thus far this year. b) Resident (R) #32 Review of the medical record on 11/07/23 revealed R#32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a terminal diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. The admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans. This was true for two (2) of 15 sample resident's care plans reviewed. Resident #16's care plan was not developed for anticoagulant therapy and Resident #32's was not developed for Hospice services. Resident identifiers: #16 and #32. Facility census: 32. Findings included: a) Resident #16 A medical record review on 11/07/23 of the current physician's orders for Resident #16 had an order for Apixaban (anticoagulant) tablet five (5) milligrams (mg) twice daily for anticoagulant therapy with a start date of 09/13/23. A review of the resident's care plan indicated anticoagulant therapy had not been developed. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/08/23 at 8:45 AM, verified the care plan for Resident #16 had not been developed for anticoagulant therapy. b) Resident (R) #32 Review of the medical record on 11/07/23 revealed R#32 was admitted to the facility on Hospice services with terminal renal cell carcinoma. The facility care plan identifies the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan related to skin assessment/breakdown. This was true for one (1) of fifteen (15) care plans reviewed. Resident #12 Facility Census: 32 Findings Included: a) Resident #12 On 11/06/23 at 1:09 PM it was observed that Resident #12 had a small open area to the dorsum of her right foot. It was open to air. On 11/07/23 at 10:06 AM record review shows the Incident/Accident Report dated 11/04/23 at 10:00 AM, describes the injury as small open area to outer/lateral right foot measures 1.2 x 0.8, appears possible pressure from button on brown slipper socks. There was an order dated 11/04/23 which reads: Cleanse area to right outer lateral foot with wound wash, pat dry, apply thin layer of bacitracin and leave open to air twice a day (BID) until healed. The Physician documented his findings when he rounded to observe the resident on 11/07/23 at 11:35 AM. and described the wound as abrasion to the dorsum of the right foot. Upon review of the care plan on 11/07/23 at 11:55 AM, it was found that there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted and readily accessible. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect all residents and visitors wishing to view the information. Facility census: 32. Findings included: a) Daily Staff Posting During a walk-thru of the facility on 11/06/23 at 10:57 AM, it was noted there was no nurse staff posting anywhere throughout the second floor of the facility where residents reside. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5, on 11/06/23 at 11:03 AM, when inquired about the location of the nurse staffing data LPN #5 reported there was a three (3) ring binder behind the nurses' station. This had the assignment sheet for nurse staffing so staff would know their assignments. When asked for a of the assignment sheet for review, LPN #5 stated she would transfer the information over to the Daily Nurse Staffing form. LPN #5 transferred the information on to the Daily Nurse Staffing form. When asked if the staffing information was always kept…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving psychotropic medications was monitored for behaviors and side effects of the medications. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 32. Findings included: a) Resident (R) #5 Review of the medical record on 11/07/23, revealed R#5 was recently admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of late onset Alzheimer's disease with aggressive dysphagia. Treatment included the administration of Seroquel (antipsychotic) and Zoloft (antidepressant). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/16/23 was coded for the presence of behaviors under section E0200. R#5 demonstrated physical behaviors towards others 4-6 days and verbal behaviors towards others 1-3 days. R#5 rejected care 4-6 days and wandered daily. The psychiatric consult note dated 10/18/23, notes prior to admission the resident was wandering the street, taking mail from other houses, verbally aggressive, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a locked permanently affixed compartment for storage of controlled drugs and other drugs subject to abuse. This practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 32. Findings Included: a) Medication Storage Room On 11/07/23 at 9:00 AM during the medication storage room observation in the presence of Register Nurse (RN) #45 it was found that the medication refrigerator had no permanently affixed locked box for controlled drugs (narcotic/benzodiazepines) in the medication refrigerator. There was a sealed 30 milliliter (ml) bottle of Lorazepam (a benzodiazepine) 2 milligram (mg)/ml in the refrigerator which was not secured. This was confirmed on 11/07/23 at 9:00 AM by RN #45 and then with the Director of Nursing on 11/07/23 at 9:14 AM. The DON agreed with the rational and the need for the permanently affixed compartment and will have it put into place.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered the trash can at the hand washing sink was not operational, and two (2) freezer floors were heavily soiled. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 32. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 11/06/23 at 10:30 AM, it was discovered the hand washing sink did not have a trash can with an operational step lid. Also, there were two (2) reach-in freezers, which required a deep cleaning of the floors. In an interview with the Dietary Manager on 11/06/23 at 10:45 AM, verified the trash can step lid was not working and both the freezers floors needed to be cleaned. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure the Physician's Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care. This was true for two (2) of 15 residents reviewed. Resident Identifiers: #16 and #15. Facility Census: 32. Findings included The 2021 POST form guidance titled, Using the POST Form: Guidance for Health Care Professionals states, The patient (or incapacitated patient's MPOA [medical power of attorney] representative or health care surrogate) must sign and date this section for the form to be legally valid. If the incapacitated patient's MPOA [medical power of attorney] representative or health care surrogate is unavailable at the time of form completion, this section can be signed by two witnesses for verbal confirmation of agreement from the patient's MPOA representative or health care surrogate. The form should be signed at the earliest available opportunity. a) Resident #16 A medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. A medication cart was left unlocked during medication pass. Resident identifiers: #13 and #16 Facility census 27. Findings included: Facility policy named Medication Administration with no effective date or signature, found the following: .Medication Cart: The medication cart is to remain locked when not in use . a) Resident # 13 On 04/26/22 at 8:00 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN) #12 take Resident #13's medications into the room for administration. The medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. RN #12 came out of Resident # 13's room and proceed down the hallway to the next Resident's room. On 04/26/22 at 8:48 AM, the Unit Manager acknowledged the medication cart is to be locked when staff were not in attendance. On 04/26/22 at 9:22 AM, the DON confirmed it is facility policy to keep the medication cart locked when not in sight or use. c) Resident #16 On 04/26/22 at 8:10 AM, an observation of RN #12 give Resident #16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five% (5 percent) or greater. There was no order to crush medications, an extended release capsule was opened and administered and bare hands touched a medication. This was discovered for nine (9) of the 28 medications observed during medication pass. Resident identifiers: #21, #16 and #26. Facility census: 27. Findings Included: a) Resident # 21 On 04/26/22 at 8:00 AM Registered Nurse (RN) #12 was observed crushing the following medications for Resident #21: 1. Tramadol 50 milligrams (mgs) 2. Lisinopril 10 mgs 3. Amlodipine 5 mgs 4. Sertraline 50 mgs 5. Diclofenac 50 mgs 6. Metoprolol 25 mgs 7. Feosol 65 mgs On review of Resident #21's medical record, found no order for allowing medications to be crushed. On 04/26/22 at 9:22 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #21 had no order to crush medications. b) Resident #16 Facility drug book titled Nursing 2022 Drug Handbook found the following: .memantine hydrochloride extended-release (ER) capsules must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the Dishwasher Temperature Log was completed. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to effect more than an unlimited number of Residents. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Dishwasher Temperature Log An observation on 04/25/22 at 11:00 AM, showed a Dishwasher Temperature Log that was incomplete with missing dishwasher water temperature checks. The following dates had blank spots on the log with missing temperatures: 04/08/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/09/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/10/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/11/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/12/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/13/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/14/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/15/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/16/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/24/22- Dinner time incomplete 04/25/22- Breakfast time incomplete During an interview on 04/25/22 at 11:20 AM, Dietitian stated that the dishwasher log was incomplete and should have been completed. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to self-determination, and reassessment of mental capacity was completed once it was clear the resident's cognition had improved. This was true for one (1) of 27 residents reviewed during the long-term care process. Resident identifier: #18. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Resident #18 During an interview on 04/25/22 at 11:43 AM, Resident #18 reported having a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) prior to being admitted to the facility three (3) years ago. Resident reported she has come a long way since admission a few years ago. In addition Resident #18 has regained a lot of her physical abilities as well as experiencing a marked increase in cognitive abilities. Resident #18 reported the facility deferred to her appointed Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) when she was admitted . A review of Resident #18's medical record was completed on 04/25/22 at 1:19 PM. --There was a Physician Determination of Capacity, dated 07/31/19, which reflected Resident #18 demonstrated incapacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of medical records, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment services, consistent with professional standards of clinical practice by not administering skin protective devices as ordered by a physician. This was true for one (1) of 27 residents reviewed in the annual long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Resident #5 An observation on 04/25/21 at 1:40 PM, noted two (2) very dark colored bruises in the center of resident's left forearm. Each bruise was approximately the size of a quarter. Review of the resident's medical record found a physician's order for geri-sleeve left arm to maintain skin integrity. Additionally, there was an order for ace wraps to lower extremities for dependent edema. The order stated staff should apply the ace wraps from the base of toes to knees before getting up in chair daily and remove at bedtime daily. A second observation on 04/26/21 at 10:30 AM, found Resident #5 in the facility's day room participating in a group activity. Resident #5 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to place heel protectors on a Resident to promote the prevention of pressure ulcer development. The failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) Residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: #13. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Resident #13 A review of Resident # 13's medical record showed a physician order that stated, Heel Protectors at all times while in bed. An observation on 04/26/22 at 9:10 AM, showed Resident #13 in bed with no heel protectors in place. During an interview on 04/26/22 at 9:10 AM, Nurse Aide (NA) # 49 stated the heel protectors were supposed to be in place while Resident # 13 was in bed but was not. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice. An oxygen humidifier bottle was not changed as ordered. This observation was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Resident #5 An observation on 04/25/22 at 12:21 PM found an oxygen humidifier bottle dated 02/24/22 connected to the oxygen source on the wall in Resident #5's room. A brief record review revealed the following order: Oxygen (O2) Orders: Change 02 tubing & humidifier bottle once weekly on Sundays 11-7. During an interview, on 04/27/22 at 10:15 AM, Unit Manager #17 confirmed the humidifier bottle was dated 02/24/22 and the bottle should have been changed. Unit Manager #17 then stated, I will address it now. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post accurate and detailed nurse staffing information on a daily basis. This was true for eleven (11) out of 26 daily nurse staffing postings reviewed. The postings either were lacking the facility census, or the hours worked. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Daily Nurse Staff Postings On 04/25/22 at 4:00 PM, observation found the daily nurse staff postings was incomplete and lacked hours worked by the nursing staff. Further review of the nurse staff postings in the month of April 2022 found the following: --04/02/22 Daily Nurse Staffing Posting missing the facility census --04/04/22 Daily Nurse Staffing Posting missing the facility census --04/06/22 Daily Nurse Staffing Posting missing the facility census --04/07/22 Daily Nurse Staffing Posting missing the facility census --04/09/22 Daily Nurse Staffing Posting missing the facility census --04/22/22 Daily Nurse Staffing Posting missing the facility census --04/23/22 Daily Nurse Staffing Posting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Resident w free of a significant medication error. This was done by allowing an extended release capsule to be opened and administered. This was true for one (1) of 28 medications reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier #16 Facility Census 27 Findings Included: a) Resident #16 Facility drug book named nursing 2022 Drug Handbook found the following: Page 931 .memantine hydrochloride extended-release capsules must be swallowed whole and never crushed, divided or chewed . On 04/26/22 at 8:10 AM this surveyor observed RN #12 open Resident #16 Memantine ER 28 mg capsule and place the contents of the capsule in the with the rest of the morning crushed medications. RN #12 preceded to administer the medications to Resident #16 in the hallway. 04/26/22 at 8:48 AM, the unit manager acknoaswledged Resident # 16 had a decline in condition recently and would need a different order for extended release medications. On 04/26/22 at 9:22 AM, the DON confirmed extended release…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately document nursing services in a Resident's medical record. The failed practice was true for one (1) of 12 sampled Residents. Resident identifier: #3. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical record showed a nursing note dated 02/26/22 that stated, Resident exhibited signs of confusion, hallucinations and decreased fluid intake. Doctor was notified and said send resident out to UHC by transport at 7:54 PM for further evaluation. Continued review of Resident 3's medical record showed a Nursing Assistant Flowsheet dated 02/26/22 at 10:56 PM that stated, preventive skin care services provided included reposition/turn and check/change. During an interview on 04/26/22 at 3:55 PM, Unit Manager (UM) and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Nursing Assistant Flowsheet should have been completed prior to Resident #3's discharge. UM stated that because the Flowsheet was not completed and dated before Resident #3's discharge the Flowsheet looked as if services were provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) was reviewed annually. This was discovered during the review of the IPCP. This had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census: 25. Findings included: a) Infection Prevention Control Program On 04/24/25 at 8:22 AM in an interview (04/23/25) with the Infection Preventionist (IP) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated that the IPCP policies and procedures had been reviewed but the former Director of Nursing (DON) who resigned did something with the manuals and they have no evidence that the manual had been reviewed annually. The last time there was evidence of review was 2019. The current IP produced seven (7) policies that had been reviewed in the last two (2) Quality Assurance meetings. Although the medical director is not required to sign policies, the facility must be able to show that the development, review, and approval of resident care policies included the Medical Director's input. Although the IP continued to search for the manual no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515075. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.