Minnie Hamilton Health Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 24 beds and averages 22.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not neglected. The facility failed to provide services to a resident that was necessary to avoid physical harm. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) resident's reviewed during the Long Term Survey Process. Resident #8 had an area on her breast that had not been identifeid by the facility. The resident suffered actual physical harm. The facility had not identified this as an area that needed assessed despite showering and dressing the resident daily. The area on the resident's breast was biopsied by a determatorly group and diagnosed as melanoma. Facility census: 24. Resident identifier: #8. Findings included: a) Resident #8 A medical record review for Resident #8 revealed Resident #8 and Resident #8's MPOA had attended a dermatology appointment on 03/21/24. The appointment was for skin irritations on Resident #8's face. During the appointment, Resident #8 questioned if the Dermatologist should look at the spot on her breast. This resulted in a biopsy being performed on her left breast with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide services to a resident that was necessary to avoid physical harm. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) resident's reviewed during the Long Term Survey Process. Resident #8 had an area on her breast that had not been identifeid by the facility. The resident suffered actual physical harm. The area on the resident's breast was biopsied by a determatorly group and diagnosed as melanoma. Facility census: 24. Resident identifier: #8. Findings included: a) Resident #8 A medical record review for Resident #8 revealed Resident #8 and Resident #8's MPOA had attended a dermatology appointment on 03/21/24. The appointment was for skin irritations on Resident #8's face. During the appointment, Resident #8 questioned if the Dermatologist should look at the spot on her breast. This resulted in a biopsy being performed on her left breast with a diagnosis of melanoma. On 03/25/24 Resident #8's daughter spoke with the facility DOQA (Directof of Quality Assurance) stating, she was upset that no one mentioned the place on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed prevent the development of pressure ulcers/injuries (PU/PI's) unless clinically unavoidable and that the facility provides care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the prevention of pressure ulcer/injury development and promote the healing of existing pressure ulcers/injuries. The physician elected This was true for 1 (one) of 2 (two) residents reviewed for the Long Term Survey Process. Facility census: 24. Resident identifier: #11. Findings include: a) Resident #11 During the review, Resident #11's record a care plan was noted with a start date of 01/31/24. The care plan revealed the resident was at high risk for skin breakdown. The reisdent was incontinent of bowel and bladder and was dependent upon staff for activities of dialy living. The care plan goal was that the resident would not develop impaired skin for the next three (3) months. The appraoches to acheive this goal and resolve this probelm were as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, Resident Council interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents know how to file a grievance and could do so anonymously if they desired. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census 23.Findings Include:a)Resident CouncilDuring the Resident council meeting on 08/12/25 at 10:30 AM, The Resident Council as a whole said that they did not know how to file a grievance.An observation on 08/12/2025 at 11:06 AM, revealed that there are no grievance forms readily available to residents on the unit.During an interview on 08/12/25 at 11:10 PM, The Activity Director (AD) went behind the nurses station and pulled a concern form out of the file cabinet and stated, I didn't know these had to be available for residents to get on their own. I will get something to put them in and get them put out for the residents to get.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity during a meal. This is a random opportunity of discovery. Resident Identifier: #14. Facility Census: #23. Findings Include: a) Resident #14 On 08/12/2025 at 12:23 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #28 was observed standing in the dining room assisting Resident #14 with her lunch meal. When the CNA was told she can not stand and assist a resident with meals, she stated I can't get a chair in here. I replied that she can move the resident if needed but she can not stand, it is a dignity issue. She obtained a chair and assisted the resident. This was confirmed with Cheif Exeucitive Officer on 08/12/2025 at 1:15 PM.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to develop/implement a care plan related to hand rolls for contractures. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of 12 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #16. Facility Census 23.Findings Include:a)Resident #16An observation on 08/11/25 at 2:50 PM, revealed that Resident #16 had contractures to both left and right hands.A record review on 08/11/25 at 3:30 PM, of Resident #16's order shows an order that reads as follows: Hand rolls to both hands due to immobility, contractures, and seizures.An observation on 08/12/25 at 9:00 AM, revealed Resident #16 in his room watching television in his Geri Chair. Resident did not have hand rolls in place as ordered by the physician.A record review on 08/12/25 at 10:30 AM revealed a care plan dated 07/09/25 for Resident #16 that reads as follows:Problem: (Resident #16 name) demonstrated no signs or symptoms of pain during the interview process, but does have multiple contractures, poor postures,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow Physicians orders for neurological checks for unwitnessed falls and hand rolls for a resident. These findings were true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the Long Term Survey Process for falls. Resident Identifier: #10 and #16. Facility Census: #23. Findings Included: a) Resident #10 On 08/13/25 at 1:48 PM record review shows Resident #10 had an unwitnessed fall on 4/29/25 at 10:30PM (Event ID# WJX19620431). It is documented that Resident was noted to be on knees beside bed holding onto blanket. Pad on bed hanging on side of bed and wedge on floor. With each sound of thunder the resident was noted to jump and grab for nurse. Severe thunderstorms in area at time of fall. According to the event summary it states at approximately 10:30 PM resident was found rocking up onto her knew beside the bed, with a blanket being held by her. The pad on the bed was hanging off the side and the wedge was on the floor, every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to promptly provide and/or obtain from an outside resource routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of medicaid funded residents. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one resident reviewed for dental during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #2. Facility Census 23.Findings Include:a)Resident #2The initial observation on 08/11/25 at 1:13 PM, revealed Resident #2 lying in bed. Residents' teeth appear to be broken off with the gum line.A record review on 08/12/25 at 1:54 PM, revealed a dental assessment worksheet completed on 05/16/24 and 08/12/24 marked as the Resident #2 having no problems with his teeth and/or gums.Further record review revealed a dental assessment worksheet completed on 05/01/25, marked yes for obvious cavities and yes for inflamed or bleeding gums.An readmission assessment dated [DATE] is marked that Resident #2 has his own teeth, and has inflamed gums. A record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record and staff interview, the facility failed to implement adverse event monitoring, and failed to implement performance improvement program activities that focus on quality of care. This was discovered during the long term care survey process and had the potential to affect all of the residents. Census 24. Findings included: a) Resident #8 - Adverse Event Monitoring 06/24/24 at approximately 1:15 PM a review was completed of a facility complaint. During the interview process of this complaint, the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) of Resident #8 was interviewed and the following letter was provided that the MPOA had received from the Director of Quality Assurance (DOQA) dated 04/01/24. The letter read as follows: This letter is a follow up to your concern received on March 25, 2024, in which you expressed concern about an area found on your mother ' s breast during a recent dermatology visit. As a result of your concern, a thorough review has been performed. The following is a summary of our…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee. This was discovered during the review of the facilities Quality Assurance Assessment committee during the Long Term Care survey Process. The Medical Director/designee and the Administrator did not attend the meetings. has the potential to affect all of the residents. Identifiers: Medical Director, Administrator. Facility Census: 24 Findings included: a) Medical Director/designee On 06/26/24 at 10:45 AM during an interview with the DON regarding the attending signatures for the Quality Assurance Meetings, the DON stated the Chief Nurse Officer (CNO) was the medical director designee. The DON also stated that the CNO served as the Infection Control Nurse for the long term care and attends the meeting as the Infection Control nurse in addition to the Medical Director designee. During the review of the CMS guidelines, that states the Medical Directors designee must not be another required member. The DON and that the Infection Control Nurse are required members. The CNO would not be able to complete the dual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent neglect and for these written policies to include the following components. This practice had the potentail to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 24. Resident identifier: #8. Findings include: a) Resident #8 On 06/24/24 at approximately 1:15 PM, a review was completed of a facility complant regading Resident #8. The complaint included a letter received from the Director of Quality Assurance (DOQA) dated 04/01/24. The letter read as follows: This letter is a follow up to your concern received on March 25, 2024, in which you expressed concern about an area found on your mother's breast during a recent dermatology visit. As a result of your concern, a thorough review has been performed. The following is a summary of our findings: 1) Staff failed to appropriately recognize and document the area that is on your mother's breast that was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to create/revise a care plan for Resident #8 with a new diagnosis of depression which was severe with psychotic symptoms. Resident #11 had newly developed pressure areas. The care plan was not updated to identify the approaches and intervention being used for the healing of those pressure areas. Facility Census: 24. Resident identifiers: #8 and #11 Findings include a) Resident #8 06/26/24 01:15 PM 06/24/24 03:48 PM record review revealed resident was admitted [DATE] with a correct PASARR, and on 08/07/17 Resident #8 received a diagnosis of major depressive disorder , recurrent, sever with psychotic symptoms. on 8/03/17 06/26/24 01:16 PM no new PASARR was created after diagnosis of major depressive disorder , recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms. On 8/03/17 and was not addressed in the care plan 06/26/24 01:25 PM Director of nursing confirmed the care plan was not updated to address the major depressive disorder. b) Resident #11 On 06/25/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and observation the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than 5 %. Med error rate 7.41%. This was true for 2 (two) of 5 (five) residents observed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Facility census: 24. Resident identifiers: Resident #7, Resident #15. Findings include: a) Resident #07 On 06/26/24 at 06/26/24 11:06 AM, this Surveyor observed LPN #51 administer a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding. The physician's order was as follows: Administer Jevity 1.5 237 ml via PEG tube, gravity feed four times daily with 110 milliliters (ml) water flushes before and after each feeding. This provides the resident with 948 ml formula, 1420 kilocalorie's (kcal's) (27kcals/kilograms (kg)), 60g protein (1.2 grams (g)/kg), 720 ml free fluids, 880 ml flush for total of 1600 ml. LPN #51 was noted to aspirate the PEG tube to check for correct placement. After LPN #51 was noted to administer the following: (1) 7 ounces (oz) cup water (1) bottle of Jevity 1.5 8 oz (237 ml) (1) 7 oz cup water After completing feeding, this Surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in WV