Madison Park Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 39.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews the facility to ensure the preparation of food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when not obtaining a hair restraint for his beard. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Facility Census: #40. Findings Include: a) [NAME] hair restraint On 01/12/26 at 11:15 AM it was observed Dietary [NAME] #14 standing over a skillet of beef cooking for the lunch meal. He had a beard and did not have a hair restraint in placed. In according to the current standards of practice such as the Food Code of the FDA, food service staff must wear hair restraints (e.g., hairnet, hat, and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting food. When ask if he was to have a hairnet in place over his beard he responded probably. He was ask to find one and place it in order to protect the residents. Review of the facility policy for Preventing Foodborne Illness - Food Handling revealed . 3. All employees to utilize appropriate hair restraints sufficient to prevent hair from contacting food or food surfaces On 01/12/26 at 11:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to provide the resident with the right to a dignified dining experience. This was a random opportunity of discovery. Resident Identifier: #25 Facility Census: #40 Findings Include: a) Resident #25 On 01/12/26 at 12:28 PM it was observed that Resident #25 did not have a lunch tray. Staff Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #60 was sitting with Resident #25's roommate assisting her with her lunch meal while Resident #25 watched. When the CNA was asked if Resident #25 was getting a lunch tray, she responded we are waiting for someone to free up to be able to assist her. On 01/12/26 at 1:01 PM the Director of Nursing was informed of the above, at which time she agreed they both were to be assisted with their meal at the same time.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete the Physicians Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) accordingly. This was true for two (2) of three (3) POST forms reviewed during the long term survey process. Resident Identifiers: #13 and #47. Facility Census: #40.Findings Include: a) Resident #13 On [DATE] at 10:50 AM record review of the Physicians Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had a POST on file stating the Resident was a No CPR (Do not attempt Resuscitation), Comfort Care Treatments with no artificial means of nutrition desired. There was an incapacity form dated [DATE] by the Physician stating the resident has long term incapacity due to dementia. The Patient/Patient Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) representative/surrogate signature (required) line on the form stated, Verbal consent (name of MPOA) and dated [DATE]. It was unclear as to which staff member obtained the POST form as there were no witnesses or staff member names on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0622 — pattern
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete transfer forms to an acute care facility for Resident #4 and #30. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident identifiers: #4 and #30. Facility Census: 40. Findings included: a) Resident #4 On 08/06/24 at 1:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 07/23/24 for hyponatremia (low sodium). The review, also, found there was no transfer form completed for the transfer. On 08/06/24 at 2:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 was notified. LPN #18 confirmed the transfer form was not completed. b) Resident #30 On 08/06/24 at 1:42 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #30. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 03/05/24 for acute encephalopathy and on 05/28/24 for a hip fracture. The review, also, found there was no transfer forms completed for the transfers. On 08/06/24 at 2:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of resident transfers to an acute care setting. This failed practice was found true for (3) three of (3) three residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #38, #30 and #4. Facility Census 40. Findings included: a) Resident #38 A record review on 08/06/24 at 3:12 PM, revealed Resident #38 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Further record review revealed no notification was sent to the ombudsman for the acute transfer on 07/22/24. During an interview on 08/06/24 at 3:46 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPNUM) confirmed the notification was not sent to the Ombudsman. b) Resident #30 On 08/06/24 at 1:42 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #30. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 03/05/24 for acute encephalopathy and on 05/28/24 for a hip fracture. The review, also, found the State Ombudsman was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to record temperatures for the medication refrigerator on the third floor. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 40. Findings Include: a) Medication Refrigerator On 08/07/24 at 8:55 AM, a tour of the third floor medication room was completed. The tour found the medication refrigerator temperatures were not being checked twice daily. The following dates and times were blank for each month: 06/01/24 PM 06/02/24 PM 06/03/24 AM 06/03/24 PM 06/08/24 PM 06/09/24 PM 06/10/24 PM 06/11/24 PM 06/12/24 PM 06/15/24 PM 06/16/24 PM 06/17/24 AM 06/17/24 PM 06/18/24 PM 06/19/24 PM 06/21/24 PM 06/22/24 PM 06/23/24 PM 06/24/24 PM 06/25/24 PM 06/26/24 PM 06/27/24 PM 06/30/24 PM 07/01/24 PM 07/02/24 PM 07/03/24 PM 07/04/24 PM 07/06/24 AM 07/06/24 PM 07/07/24 PM 07/08/24 PM 07/09/24 PM 07/10/24 PM 07/13/24 PM 07/14/24 PM 07/15/24 PM 07/16/24 PM 07/17/24 PM 07/18/24 PM 07/20/24 PM 07/21/24 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards of practice. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 40. Findings include: a) Reach-in refrigerator During the initial tour of the kitchen on 08/05/24 at 12:05 PM, the following items was found to be out of date or not labeled at all in the reach-in refrigerator: -- Broccoli soup with an expiration date of 08/01/24 -- Boiled eggs in a plastic container which was not labeled with a use by date. -- (2) two bowls of spiral cooked noodles which was not labeled with a use by date -- Tomato soup in a plastic container which was not labeled with a use by date. During an interview on 08/05/24 at 12:30 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #17 stated, Yes, they are out. I will get them out of there. I didn't realize it. I think we just put the eggs in there this morning. A review of the facilities policy on 08/06/24 at 11:00 AM, titled {Food receiving and storage} number (8)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an appropriate infection control program for administration of medications to Resident #34 and Resident #13, cleansing of glucometer for Resident #13 and catheter care for Resident #38. There were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #34, #13, and #38. Facility Census: 40. Findings included: a1) Resident #34 On 08/07/24 at 8:55 AM, an observation was made during medication administration by Registered Nurse (RN) #59. While preparing the medication for Resident #34, RN #59 touched two pills with bare hands. The following medication was touched by RN #59: --Flecainide 150mg --Zofran 4mg On 08/07/24 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the medication should not be touched with bare hands during medication administration. a2) Resident #13 On 08/07/24 at 9:10 AM, RN #59 touched one (1) pill during medication for Resident #13. The following medication was touched with bare hands by RN #59: --Buspar 5mg On 08/07/24 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy for a transfer to an acute care setting for Resident #4. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident Identifier: #4. Facility Census: 40. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 08/06/24 at 1:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 07/23/24 for hyponatremia (low sodium). The review, also, found the resident and/or resident representative was not provided a bed hold policy by the facility. On 08/06/24 at 2:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 was notified. LPN #18 confirmed the bed hold policy had not been provided upon transfer to the acute care setting.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to update a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review(PASARR). This was found true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the PASRR care area during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #5. Facility Census: 40. Findings include: A review of Reisdent #5's on 08/05/24, revealed Resident #5 had a diagnosis of Psychotic disturbance and Major Depressive disorder, and psychosis. Further Record review revealed the most recent and only PASRR was done on 01/17/08 and contained the following diagnosis: ~ Bipolar disorder ~Psychosis ~Constipation ~Depression ~Nutrition Continued record review found there was no current medical diagnosis for Bipolar disorder. On 08/06/24 at 03:58 PM , the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the PASRR should have been updated to address Major depressive disorder, and stated not sure why there was no diagnosis for Bipolar Disorder and why it would be on the PASARR.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $401K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV