Montgomery General Elderly Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 54% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 58.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Hcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to protect Residents from mental, physical, and sexual abuse resulting in actual harm, including physical pain, mental anguish and psychosocial harm to multiple residents, as perpetrated by Resident #49's ongoing pattern of irrational and aggressive behaviors. This was true for seven (7) of 58 residents. Two (2) residents had to be sent to the hospital for physical harm resulting from Resident #49's actions. Several residents complained of living in fear of Resident #49 which is psychosocial harm. Resident #49 was found in another residents room in their bed completely nude and touching the other resident which is a form of sexual abuse. Resident identifiers: Resident #49, Resident #31, Resident #27, Resident #52, Resident #16, Resident #20, Resident #44 and Resident # 54. Facility census: 58. Findings Included: a) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Resident Abuse/Neglect reads as follows: I. POLICY: .to ensure that residents are not subjected to abuse by staff, other residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to effect all residents currently residing in the facility during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Dining room Continuous observation of the dining room on [DATE] from 11:30 AM to 12:01 PM, revealed that at 12:01 PM, (3) three residents at the round table were served their lunch meal. During the continuous observation no hand hygiene was offered and/or performed with the residents in the dining room area. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:03 PM, Nursing Assistant (NA) # 4 stated, They are supposed to lay them wet ones on the table, and nope they are not there today. Further observation of the lunch meal showed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by not providing a clean privacy curtain for Resident #27, and ensuring the residents' shower area for B Bath did not have paint peeling, missing caulking and rust on a shower caddy. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #27. Facility Census: 57.Findings included: a) On 11/24/2025 at 12:45 Pm, The B Bath shower room was investigated. Peeling paint in the shower area and the bathroom floor area were observed including around the toilet by the state surveyors. The Administrator in Training reported the shower rooms are addressed yearly. On 11/25/2025 at 08:12 AM, the B Bath shower room was observed. The following observations were observed: paint peeling and missing on a large portion of the shower room's floor, caulking was missing around the toilet and in the shower area, large ring of missing paint and brownish substance was around the toilet, and paint was missing from the base of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with current standards of practices by not following its policy and physicians orders related to weights. This failed practice was found true for (3) three of (6) six residents reviewed for nutrition during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #55, #9, and #11. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Weight monitoring policy A review on 11/25/25 at 10:30 AM, of the policy titled {Weight Monitoring}, Section 2, C, reads: If there is a noticeable discrepancy in the current weight vs previous weight, the resident shall be re-weighted and the charge nurse shall follow-up accordingly. b) Resident #55 A record review on 11/24/25 at 2:32 PM, revealed that on 11/05/25 Resident #55 weighted 173 pounds (lbs.), and weighed 183 lbs. on 11/10/25. She was not reweighed for the weight discrepancy until 11/18/25 in which she weighed 173.5 lbs. Further record review for Resident #55, revealed an order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity during the dining experience by referring to the resident's adaptive spoon as a baby spoon. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents and was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #8. Facility Census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #8 On 11/25/25 at 12:10 PM, the State Surveyor was observing the dining room lunch meal service. Nursing Assistant (NA) #31 yelled across the room to the dietary window and told the staff to Throw me a baby spoon. NA #21 confirmed the spoon asked for by NA #31 was a baby spoon and that the resident sometimes eats with her fingers. The resident's diet order stated, NAS (No Added Salt), PUREE Special Instructions: Color suction lip plate, small color coated spoon. On 11/25/25 at 01:46 PM, the Administrator in Training reported they did not have a policy and procedure for dignity, but that they follow the state guidelines for dignity. The facility's Dining Program Policy and Procedure stated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the resident's Medical Power of Attorney was notified when the resident experienced significant weight loss. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident identifier: #11. Facility census: 57. a) Resident #11 The facility's policy and procedure titled Weight Monitoring with effective date January 2004 and most recent revision date April 2016 stated the Power of Attorney (POA) or legal representative would be notified when the resident experienced significant weight loss. Review of Resident #11's medical records revealed on 09/09/25 the resident weighed 160 pounds (lbs). On 10/07/25, the resident weighed 144 lbs. This is a 10 percent (%) weight loss in approximately four (4) weeks. The resident continued to lose weight, weighing 141 lbs on 11/17/25. Further review of Resident #11's medical records showed no documentation the resident's POA was notified when the resident was found to have significant weight loss on 10/07/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Observation, Interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents private and confidential information was kept safe. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the long term care survey process with the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents. Facility census: 57 On 11/25/2025 at 9:20 AM while conducting rounds this surveyor observed a medication cart and computer left unlocked and screen open while the nurse went to get medication from the med room. A resident's name and information was left on screen and easily viewable to anyone who passed by. The cart left approx. three min unattended.On 11/25/25 at 9:26 AM in an interview with LPN #72 stated that they had to get a med the resident needed to complete a med pass. I was only gone for a minute. During record review on 11/25/2025 at 2:00 PM of the New employee/Med cart and Resident Privacy policy's, It states that all carts and computers shall be locked and secured before stepping away for any length of time. The Administrator stated during an interview on 11/25/2025 at 2:12 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to ensure residents' comprehensive care plans were revised when changes occurred to the residents' interventions and residents' behaviors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect two (2) of 20 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #11 and #2. Facility census: 57. Findings included:a) Resident #11Resident #11's comprehensive care plan had a focus for a potential for nutritional problem. An intervention was initiated for 07/15/25 for monthly weights to be obtained. On 09/09/25, Resident #11 weighed 160 pounds (lbs). On 10/07/2025, the resident weighed 144 lbs. This was a 10 percent (%) weight loss in four (4) weeks. On 10/10/25, an order was written for weekly weights. Prior to this, the resident was weighed monthly. The resident's care plan was not updated when the resident's frequency to be weighed was changed from weekly to monthly. On 11/25/25 at 11:05 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed Resident #11's care plan was not revised when the resident was ordered to be weighed weekly instead…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care related to showers for dependent residents. This failed practice was found to be true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADL care during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier:#27 Facility Census: 57 Resident identifier #27 Facility census #57.Findings include:a) Resident #27 On 11/25/25 at 4:00 pm record review shows the following:According to the shower schedule provided by the facility resident #27 is scheduled for showers on Tuesdays and Thursdays on day shift.Resident #27 was scheduled/received showers on the following days:10/28/25 - received no shower 10/30/25 - received no shower11/04/25 - received shower11/06/25 - received shower11/11/25 - received shower11/13/25 - received shower11/18/25 - received no shower11/20/25 - received no showerRecord review completed on 11/25/25 revealed Resident #27 is an extensive total dependence with one person assisting for showers.Further record review on 11/25/25 of Resident #27's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon Observation, Interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility remains free from accident hazards due to a medication cart and computer being left unlocked and in the main hallway A. This was a random opportunity for discovery during a long-term survey. Census: 57 Findings include: a) On 11/25/25 at 9:20 AM while conducting rounds this surveyor observed a medication cart and computer left unlocked while the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) went to get medication from the med room. A resident's name and information were left on screen, and the med cart was unlocked, and drawers were able to be opened. The cart was left approximately three (3) minutes unattended.On 11/25/25 at 9:26 AM in an interview with LPN #72 the LPN stated that they had to get a medication the resident needed to complete a medication pass. LPN #72 said, I was only gone for a minute. During record review on 11/25/2025 at 2:00 PM of the Med cart and Resident Privacy policy's, it states that all carts and computers shall be locked and secured before stepping away for any length of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' care was supervised by a physician. The facility failed to document the physician was aware of Resident #11's significant weight loss. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident Identifier: #11. Facility Census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #11 The facility's policy and procedure titled Weight Monitoring with effective date January 2004 and most recent revision date April 2016 stated the attending physician would be notified when the resident experienced significant weight loss. Review of Resident #11's medical records revealed on 09/09/2025 the resident weighed 160 pounds (lbs). On 10/07/2025, the resident weighed 144 lbs. This is a 10 percent (%) weight loss in approximately four (4) weeks. The resident continued to lose weight, weighing 141 lbs on 11/17/25. Further review of Resident #11's medical records showed no documentation the resident's attending physician was notified when the resident was found…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $445K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV