Sundale Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan by failing to use both floor mats for Resident #79 with a a history of falls. Resident identifier: #79. Facility Census: 91. Findings included: a) Resident #79 On 05/27/26 at 12:31 PM, observed a fall mat against the air unit, a fall mat on the resident's right side of bed and the absence of a fall mat on the left side of resident's bed. At 12:32 PM Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) #164 was asked about the mat and went to find a nurse. He returned without nurse and observed fall mat leaning against heating/air unit and reported that usually it meant she has an order for it and he would put it back down on the left side of her bed. OTA #164 reported that he would report to the nurse. Review of resident's physician orders dated 11/11/25 stated bed side mats (low profile) on floor- at all times while in bed. Review of the care plan revealed, pages 7-8. Focus- Resident #79 is at risk for serious injury related to history of falls, impaired mobility, incontinence,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on Observations and Staff interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The first floor south nutrition room had five (5) Glucerna drinks that were expired. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the normal Long Term Survey Process, that had the potential to effect more then a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 91. a) During the facility walkthrough and inspection of the nutrition areas on 05/27/26 at approximately 10:45 AM, five (5) expired Glucerna supplements were found in the first-floor south wing resident nutrition room. They expired on 01/03/26 and remained in the cabinet accessible to residents.During a interview with Social Worker #148 on 05/27/26 at approximately 11:15 AM, they confirmed the supplements were expired and then discarded them.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document voice grievances (such as those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) and maintain evidence of the result of all grievances for no less than 3 years from the date the grievance decision was issued. This has the potential to affect, more than a limited number of Residents. Facility census: 85. Findings Included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, showed: --The grievance official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process: receiving and tracking grievances through their conclusion. --Evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances will be maintained for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision. A grievance log will be maintained for each calendar year. a) Grievance Process A record review on 01/08/25 of grievances revealed no grievance forms or logs were filled out for the last two years. During an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 01/08/25 at 2:22 PM SSD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate weights were obtained for three (3) out of three (3) residents sampled for weight loss. Failure to monitor and investigate significant changes in resident's weight status places the residents at risk for an incorrect assessment or diagnosis of impaired nutrition or hydration status. Further, this failed practice potentially prevented the interdisciplinary team from accurately developing and implementing interventions to stabilize or improve the resident's nutritional status before complications arose. Resident Identifiers: Residents #24, #53 and #78. Facility Census:85. The findings included: a) Resident #24 During a review of Resident #24's weights on 01/09/25 at approximately 9:18 AM, the following values were revealed: 10/1/2024 21:28 175.9 Lbs 11/1/2024 23:28 175.9 Lbs 12/1/2024 20:35 177.2 Lbs 1/8/2025 19:29 160.4 Lbs Based on these records, the resident experienced a weight loss of 16.8 pounds, (9.4% of body weight), over a period of 37 days, between 12/01/24 and 01/08/25. A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-14 · tag F0710 — pattern
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's significant change in weight, and failed to ensure that the physician conducted a medical evaluation of a resident with a sudden significant change in weight. As a result, the residents were not evaluated to determine the cause for the sudden change in body weight. This placed the resident at risk for serious harm or death. Resident Identifiers: Resident #24, #53, and #78. Facility Census: 85. Findings Included: a) Resident #24 During a review of Resident #24's weights on 01/09/25 at approximately 9:18 AM, the following values were revealed: -10/1/2024 21:28 175.9 Lbs -11/1/2024 23:28 175.9 Lbs -12/1/2024 20:35 177.2 Lbs -01/8/2025 19:29 160.4 Lbs Based on these records, the resident experienced a weight loss of 16.8 pounds, (9.4% of body weight), over a period of 37 days, between 12/01/24 and 01/08/25. A review of Resident #24's care plan revealed the following: PROBLEM: [Resident] has the potential for decreased fluid status, AEB constipation, hx of UTI, and intake less than 75%.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store food in a safe sanitary manner in regard to storing medical ice packs in the freezer in the residents pantry. This has the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 85. Findings Included: a) Two South Resident Pantry During the tour on 01/08/25 at 9:20 AM to the Resident pantry, two (2) medical Ice packs were observed stored in resident freezer. An interview, on 01/08/25 at 9:20 AM, with the Dietary Manager confirmed the medical ice packs should not be stored with resident food.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that the long-term care Ombudsman was sent a copy of the written Notice of Transfer for acute hospital transfers. This was true for two (2) out of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #28 and #4. Facility census: 85. Findings included: a) Resident #28 A record review, completed on 01/14/25 at 9:26 AM, revealed that Resident #28 had been transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Although the Notice of Transfer/Discharge was given to the resident at the time of transfer, there was no evidence that the facility had sent a copy of the notice to the long-term care Ombudsman. During an interview on 01/14/25 at 11:19 AM, the Director of Social Services stated that she had not yet sent a notification to the long-term care Ombudsman. She stated, We do a log, I am way behind on my log. We try to do it no less than yearly. b) Resident 4 Medical Record review on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to identify Major Depressive disorder on Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). This was found true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: Resident #53. Facility Census: 85 Findings included: a) Resident #53 A record review conducted on 01/07/25, at approximately 11:45 AM for Resident #53 revealed that the PASARR completed on 03/18/24 did not include any diagnoses of Mental Disorder (MD) or Intellectual Disability (ID). Record reviews also indicated that Resident #53 had been diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) on 11/26/24. Further record review revealed no updated PASARR that captured the MDD diagnosis. During an interview, with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 01/09/24 at approximately 10:55 AM, she confirmed that the PASARR did not reflect the new diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. She further stated that she would notify Social Services of the deficiency. On 01/13/24 at approximately 12:12 PM, during an interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident had a person-centered, comprehensive care plan, developed and implemented to meet his / her preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This practice affected one (1) of nine (9) residents' care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). This failure to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was developed to ensure the residents' highest practicable well-being placed the resident at risk of not receiving services that would meet their desires or needs. Resident Identifier: Resident #53. Facility Census: 85. Findings included: a) Resident #53 During a review of Resident #53's current diagnoses performed on 01/07/25 at approximately 11:45 AM, revealed that the resident had been diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) on 11/26/24. Continued review revealed the resident's current care plan did reflect specific interventions to address the symptoms and management of MDD. The care plan, however, did address…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to administration of pain medication. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain during the annual long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #2. Facility census: 85. Findings included: a) Resident #2 A record review was completed on 01/08/25 at 7:00 PM. The record review demonstrated that Resident #2 had the following physician order: Hydrocodone-Acetaminaphen oral tablet 5-325 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain related to pain, for severe pain (7-10). Review of the December 2024 and January 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed the following dates the medication was administered outside the physician's parameters for severe pain. December 2024 -12/10/24 Pain Level of 6 -12/11/24 Pain Level of 3 -12/25/24 Pain Level of 3 January 2025 -12/06/26 Pain Level of 3 During an interview on 01/09/25 at 8:56 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the medication was administered outside of the parameters set in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV