Hampshire Memorial Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 27.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.05 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.43 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all code status documentation for Resident #20 and Resident #25, who both requested to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) matched. This failure placed Resident #20 and Resident #25 in an immediate risk for serious harm and/or death. The state agency notified the facility of the immediate jeopardy situation on 01/22/26 at 1:37 PM. The state agency accepted the facility's plan of correction on 01/22/26 at 3:28 PM. After observation of the implementation of the plan of correction, the immediate jeopardy was abated at 9:00 AM on 01/23/26.Resident Identifiers: #20 and #25. Facility Census:28.During an interview on 01/22/26 at approximately 12:10 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19, reported staff could use the following methods to double-check a resident's code status should they be found pulseless and not breathing: --Physician's order--Physician's Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form--Code status listed on the outside of the medical chart at the nurses' station--Full code list posted in the Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's order for resident care. The physician order for Gabapentin was not properly followed for Resident #7. This failed practice was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the Unnecessary Medications pathway in the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP) pathway. Resident #7. Facility census: 28.a) Resident #7 During a record review, completed on 01/21/2026 at 11:10 AM, the following physician order was found for Resident #7: Gabapentin Oral Capsule (Gabapentin) - Give 100 mg by mouth three times a day for Diabetic Neuropathy.Review of Resident #7's Medication Administration Records (MARs) from August 2025 - January 2026 revealed the following dates and times the MAR was left blank: -08/03/25 at 2:00 PM-10/21/25 at 2:00 PM-12/14/25 at 2:00 PM-01/18/26 at 2:00 PM The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 01/21/2026 at 1:30 PM. The DON confirmed the blanks in the MARs and reported that the professional standard of practice was for nurses to document on the MAR when medication was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of food. This failed practice had the potential to effect more than a limited amount of residents receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 28.a) Kitchen During the initial walkthrough of the kitchen it was found that the following food items did not have an 'opened on date or a use by date:-Frozen strawberries-Frozen blueberries-Pickles-Ice cream-Sherbet-Tater tots-Sausage patties-Liquid eggs Dietary Employee #32 and Dietary Employee #53 were not wearing beard nets. It was also found that there was no lid on trash can. The Dietary Manager verified the above-mentioned details.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a proper infection control program for medication administration. These was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 28.Findings Included: a) Medication Administration On 01/23/26 at 8:34 AM, medication administration for Resident #7 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19 was observed. Upon entering Resident #7's room, LPN #19 sat the resident's Flonase nasal spray and Moxifloxin eye drops directly on the over-the-bed table with using a barrier. On 01/23/26 at 8:41 AM, LPN #19 confirmed she did not place the medication on a barrier. On 01/23/26 at 8:48 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the medication should have been placed on a barrier.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan care which included a resident's preference and potential for future discharge. The facility failed to document whether the resident's desire to return to the community was assessed for Resident #10. This was true for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #10. Facility census: 28.a) Resident #10 During a record review, completed on 01/21/2026 at 11:44 AM, it was determined that the comprehensive care plan for Resident #10 did not include the resident's preference and potential for future discharge. There was no evidence the facility had assessed the resident's potential for discharge from the facility. During an interview, on 01/21/2026 at 1:35 PM, the DIrector of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #10's care plan did not include resident's preference and potential for discharge stating that it had been missed.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and complete documentation of a discontinued medication for Resident #14. This was true for one (1) of five (5) medications reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. Additionally, based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one (1) out of 19 records reviewed for accurate POST forms. This failed practice applied to Resident #25. Resident identifiers: #14 and #25. Facility census: 28. Findings Included: a) Resident #14 On [DATE] at 1:20 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #14. The review found a physician's order stating, Continue to monitor for antidepressant side effects. However, the antidepressant, Trazodone, had been discontinued on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 1:39 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the physician's order should have been discontinued. b) Resident #25 An electronic medical review, completed on [DATE] at 11:30 AM, found…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the Quality Assessment Performance Improvement meetings did not include all required members for two (2) of four (4) meetings. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Review of Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting sign-in sheets On 02/22/24 at 9:04 AM, the Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting sign-in sheets were reviewed for the past four (4) quarters. The sign-in sheet for 05/31/23 indicated neither the Medical Director nor a designee for the Medical Director had attended the QAPI meeting. The sign-in sheet for 09/01/23 indicated the Medical Director, the Director of Nursing, the facility vice-president, and the Infection Preventionist had attended the meeting. The meeting was also attended by a member of the therapy/rehabilitation staff. However, another member of staff did not attend the meeting as required. During an interview on 02/22/24 at 9:20 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the Medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide residents the opportunity to file grievances anonymously by not making grievance forms accessible to residents. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: #27 Findings included: a) Facility On 02/20/24 at 11:10 AM observation found that there were no grievance forms accessible to residents to obtain on their own accord. Upon discussion with the Director of Nursing on 02/20/24 at 12:10 PM, she states the forms are kept in her office in a file cabinet. The Residents must go through a staff member to file a grievance. When asked how the Residents file an anonymous grievance, she states they do not. According to the regulation: 483.10(j) Grievances. . Notifying resident individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility of the right to file grievances orally (meaning spoken) or in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; During a Resident Council meeting on 02/21/24 residents present (14 residents) stated they can not file a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for seven (7) of fourteen (14) residents reviewed in the long term care survey sample. Resident Identifiers: #1, #27, #24, #11, #13, #20 and #3. Facility Census: #27. Findings included: a) Resident #1 On 02/20/24 at 03:10 PM record review show Resident #1 has a history of weight loss. Weights were documented as: 02/08/24 203.8 01/23/24 203.8 11/02/23 217.5 08/04/23 233.5 Further review of Resident #1's care plan found that there was no care plan developed for weight loss. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 02/20/24 at 03:58 PM who agreed that Resident #1 should be care planned for weight loss. b) Resident #27 On 02/20/24 at 11:50 AM record review shows Resident #27 was admitted on [DATE] with contractures to the left shoulder and elbow. Review of the care plan in place found the contractures were not included on the care plan in place. This was confirmed with the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to document vital signs when medications were held for Resident #13 and Resident #7. The facility failed to follow the physician's orders for side rails for Resident #11. This deficient practice had the potential to affect three (3) of 14 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifiers: #13, #7, #11. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's physician's orders showed the following order written on 10/06/23, Lisinopril, oral tablet, 5 mg [milligrams], one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension. Hold for SBP [systolic blood pressure] < [less than] 100. On 12/13/24 at 8:00 AM, Resident #13's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was marked 5 for Lisinopril administration. According to the MAR code, 5 means hold/see nurse notes. However, there was no nurse note in the progress notes. The area on the MAR to record the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug/medication regimen is managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Resident's #13, #24, #7 and #3 received psychotropic medications without adequate indication for use. Nonpharmacological interventions were not provided prior to starting the medication and the facility failed to monitor medications for side effects and efficacy. This was true for four (4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: #13, #24, #7, and #3. Facility census: 27. Findings included: a) Resident #13 Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/17/23, a physician determined the Resident lacked capacity to make medical decisions due to a diagnosis of Dementia and his wife was appointed as his health care surrogate. The Resident was admitted without any psychotropic medications. On 11/05/23, Lexapro 20 milligrams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2026-01-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in WV