Cedar Ridge Center
302 Cedar Ridge Road, Sissonville, WV 25320 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (304) 984-0046 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 4 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $149,858 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-18)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-03, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-03 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.3% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.8% | 7.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.2% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.9% | 15.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.3% | 27.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.1% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.6% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.1% | 11.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.65 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.22 | 1.84 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 33% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.9%CMS range 35.3–55.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.8–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.2–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 113.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to provide necessary safety to a resident who eloped the facility. Resident #18 eloped from the facility on 03/08/26 at approximately 9:00 AM. No action was taken by the facility until 1:30 PM, although a staff member seen Resident #18 walking down the street at approximately 9:00 AM. This neglectful practice placed Resident #18 in immediate risk for serious harm and or death. Resident identifier: #18 Facility Census: 113.The State Agency (SA) determined the facility's failure to act on a known elopement resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation when: staff witnessed Resident #18 walking down a public street at approximately 9:00 AM on 03/08/26 but failed to intervene or report the sighting. The facility remained unaware of the resident's absence and took no search or recovery actions for 4.5 hours, until 1:30 PM. This deficient practice created a likelihood for serious injury, harm, or death, as Resident #18 was left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31, #37, #105 and #53 had an accident-free environment. Excessive gaps were found with no gap fillers at the foot of three (3) residents' beds. One (1) resident had his arm entrapped between the mattress and side rail. Excessive gaps in danger zones on a resident bed can lead to serious injuries including death. This created an immediate jeopardy situation that began on 05/13/25 at 10:00 AM and ended on 05/14/25 at 12:00 PM. Resident identifiers: #31, #37, #105 and #53. Facility census: 104. Findings include: a) On 05/13/25 between the hours of 9:30 AM through 10:00 AM, observations of all the beds in the facility revealed that the mattresses had no gap fillers and there were gaps greater than approximately 5 inches in resident beds. This allowed for a space at the foot of the bed that could allow the entrapment of Resident #31, Resident #37, and Resident #53. On 05/13/25 at approximately 11:40 a.m., an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on water temperature measurement and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. The hot water temperature in the hand washing sink located in the main dining room was at an unsafe temperature for resident use. The water temperature in the hand sink in the main dining room was tested with facility equipment by the facility's maintenance director at approximately 2:30 PM on 04/16/25 the temperature was 139.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The water temperature in the sink in the main dining room at 2:56 PM was obtained in the same manner mentioned above and was 125 degrees Fahrenheit. The state agency (SA) felt this put any resident who was able to wash their hands in this sink at an immediate risk for serious injury and/or death and created an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The SA notified the facility of the IJ at 3:56 PM on 04/16/25. The SA accepted the facility's plan of correction (POC) at 4:07 PM on 04/16/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #111 received respiratory care to ensure Resident #111's airway remained intact and was able to be reestablished immediately if the tracheotomy tube would become dislodged. This was true for one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of Respiratory care during the long term care survey process. The facility failed to ensure they had the supplies at bedside to replace Resident #111's tracheotomy canula. The physician orders and Resident #111's care plan dictated the supplies were to be kept at bedside. When the staff was asked were the supplies were to replace the canula were located, it took greater than 15 minutes to find the needed supplies in the supply closet. They were not kept at bedside as directed in the physician order and care plan. The failure to replace Resident #111's tracheotomy cannula timely could result in the immediate loss of a secure airway leading to severe hypoxia, anoxic brain injury,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to follow the diet order for a resident on a pureed diet. The wrong texture of diet was provided which resulted in a choking incident for Resident #112. This failed practice was found true for (1) of (3) residents reviewed for diet order accuracy during the survey process. Resident identifiers #112. Facility Census 111. The State Agency (SA) determined this placed the resident in a past non-compliance immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. Resident #112 was provided regular texture food, which caused her to choke. The resident late died. The SA called the past noncompliance IJ starting on 08/14/24 and ending on 08/22/24. The facility was notified of the IJ at 2:05 PM on 08/26/24. Findings Include: a) Resident #112 A record review on 08/26/24 at 12:05 PM, found Resident #112 was ordered the following diet: Dysphagia pureed texture, thick liquids-nectar consistency. Further record review revealed a care plan which read as follows: Focus: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed for residents with Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO's). Resident identifiers: #12, #17 and #72. Facility census: 110. On 07/18/24 at 3:51 PM an immediate jeopardy (IJ) was called at as this failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings included: a) Resident #12 Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included paraplegic, neurogenic bladder with suprapubic catheter, decubitus ulcers, vascular ulcers both heels, chronic kidney disease, and insulin dependent diabetic. admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/11/24 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 15. This indicates intact cognition. The resident had the capacity to make medical decisions. On 07/18/24 at 10:55 AM observed two (2) Nurse Aides (NA's) performing direct resident care of changing urine soaked brief and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-07-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure four (4) residents were free of significant medication errors. On 07/11/24, the facility reported to the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC), Adult Protective Services (APS), and the Ombudsman that Resident #69, Resident #74, Resident #39, and Resident #108 were administered their 8:00 AM medications twice due to incomplete medication administration documentation. The facility developed and implemented a plan of correction on 07/11/24. The state agency investigated the matter on 07/18/24 and determined on 07/11/24 Resident #69, Resident #74, Resident #39, and Resident #108 were in an Immediate Jeopardy situation due to potential adverse consequences from duplicate medication administration. The stage agency reviewed the facility's plan of correction and documentation and determined the Immediate Jeopardy situation had been abated on 07/14/24 when all education with staff was completed. This was prior to the state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, family interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #46 was walking with Restorative Therapy, without a Gait belt and fell. The State Agency (SA) determined harm occurred to Resident #46; the fall resulted in a break in her left femur and a fracture below her right knee. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for falls during the complaint survey process. Resident identifier #46. Facility Census: 113. Findings Include:a) Resident #46A record review on 03/17/26 at 9:30 AM, revealed that Resident #46 had a fall on 02/18/26 and was sent to a local emergency room for pain to her right and left legFurther record review of the Diagnostic Radiology reports from the hospital showed the following:Left Femur: Anterior apex angulated fracture of the distal femur diametaphyseal fracture with impaction.Right Knee: Impaction and comminuted anterior apex angulated fracture distal fifth metaphysis present.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide an environment for residents free from neglect and physical harm for one (1) of four (4). This failed practice caused physical harm to Resident #105. Resident #105 fell out of bed and injured his left arm. The failed practice was determined by the state survey team to have been corrected prior to entrance and will be cited at past non-compliance. Resident identifier: #105. Facility census: 104. Findings include: a) Resident #105 Medical Record review revealed Resident #105 was a [AGE] year old admitted for long term care. He had the following diagnoses: diabetes, hypokalemia, dementia, dysphagia, thyroid disorder and history of falls. He lacked capacity and had a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5. A score of 5 indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of an internal investigation completed by the facility revealed Resident #105 had a fall on 04/19/25. According to the facility's investigation this fall resulted in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure orders and interventions were followed to control pain for Residents #42 and #87. This was true for two (2) of six (6) residents reviewed for pain management during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #42, #87. Facility census: 111. The State Agency (SA) determined physical harm was caused to Resident #42 when the facility failed to check on, and assess, Resident #42 for pain, for approximately 50 minutes, despite him yelling out the entire duration, until surveyor intervention. At which time, it was discovered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #36, Resident #42 was in pain and requested pain medication. Furthermore, physical harm was determined based upon the review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), orders, and care plan, which revealed the resident had not gotten the correct dose of pain medication, had not received any nonpharmacological interventions for pain as ordered, and was not receiving interventions for pain management that were in place in his care plan. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a safe clean and homelike environment. Various cosmetic imperfections were found and two (2) residents did not have bed linens. These were random opportunities for discovery and have the potential to effect more than an isolated number of residents. Room identifiers: #15, #16, #24, #28, #32, #33, #35, #36, #37, #39, and #42. Resident identifiers: #76, and #130. Facility Census: 115. a) A facility walk through on 06/17/26 at 10:35 AM, with the facility administrator found and confirmed the following environmental issues in Resident Rooms #15, #16, #24, #28, #32, #33, #35, #36, #37, #39, and #42: b) room [ROOM NUMBER]: The caulking around the sink and countertop was cracked with missing pieces and had dark, discolored debris buildup. Bathroom toilet base was blackish with missing pieces, Missing paint chips around entry door and bathroom door, Resident's wheel chair cushion with heavy food crumb and dirt buildup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to revise care plans for Resident #115 and Resident #11 and failed to ensure an interdisciplinary approach to care planning for Resident #91. Resident identifiers: #115, #111 and #91. Facility census: 115.Findings included: a) Resident # 11 The Care-plan dated 05/05/25 indicated an e cigarette must be kept and charged at the nursing station.During an interview with Resident #11 on 6/16/26 at 11:00 am he stated he no longer used the e cigarette. Resident # 11 stated he only used smokeless tobacco. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/17/26 at 10:00 am verified the resident was only using smokeless tobacco as evidenced on the facility smoking list. b) Resident 115 Resident #11 had cataract procedure resulting in MD orders to wear an eye shield to left eye on 04/07/25. During survey observations on 06/16/26 11:00 am and 06/18/26 at 10:00 am Resident #115 was not wearing an eye shield on her left eye. Resident #115 stated the procedure was last year. The DON confirmed that Resident #115 did not have current MD orders to wear a left eye shield. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow physician's orders to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed related to positioning and wearing splints/orthotics. Resident Identifiers: Resident # 10. Facility Census: 115. Findings Included: a) Resident #10 Resident #10 has a diagnosis code of M24.571, which is a contracture of the right ankle. Resident #10 has orders that state Medex boots to Bilateral Lower Extremity (BLE) licensed nurse to remove and assess skin integrity every shift. It was observed on 06/18/2026 at 12:05 PM no boots were on Resident #10. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) reviewed for June 2026 revealed that the assessment was done and boots removed at the following times: 01:17, 10:40, and 19:05. This was signed off by Employee #67. Resident #10's tasks were also reviewed for 06/18/26: Preventative skin care (protectors heel/elbow) were documented at 10:40 AM and 7:05 PM by Employee #102 these items were completed. It was observed during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. There was an issue with lawncare equipment that could potential injure a resident being present and accessible to residents in the courtyard and a screw protruding through the arm rest on a resident's wheelchair. Resident identifiers: #34 and #102. Facility Census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #34 Observation of Resident #34 in the courtyard at approximately 11:30 am revealed Resident #34 was opening a storage bench and taking out what appeared to be pruning shears. He used the pruning shears to clear out some weeds away from the gazebo. He then returned the shears to the storage bench. The resident left the courtyard. The surveyor went to the courtyard and opened the storage bench and found there was one (1) pair of Pruning Shears, one (1) hand held metal [NAME] shovel with a pointed end, one (1) hand held shovel with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all food was temped before leaving the kitchen, to ensure safe and appetizing temperatures of the food to prevent foodborne illness. The facility failed to ensure all foods were palatable. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #14 and #63. Facility census: 115Findings include: a) Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) policy #6 titled Food Quality and Palatability stated: Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive, and served in a manner, form, and texture to meet resident's needs. Proper safe and appetizing temperature: Food should be at the appropriate temperature as determined by the type of food to ensure resident's satisfaction and minimize the risk for scalding and burns. HCSG policy #16 titled Food Preparation states: All foods are prepared in accordance with the FDA Food Code. On 06/17/26 at 12:25 PM, the surveyor asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident preferences and appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice. Resident identifiers: #32, #40 and #9.Facility Census: 115. Findings Included: a) Dining and Food Preferences policy statement:During a record review of the facility dining and food preference policy statement #8 indicated Upon meal service, any resident/patient with expressed or observed refusal of food and/or beverages will be offered an alternative selection of comparable nutrition value. and policy statement #9 stated The alternative meal and/or beverage selection will be provided in a timely manor. b) Resident #32 Upon facility entrance interview with Resident #32, on 06/16/26 at 12:30 PM, she stated she liked boiled eggs but kept getting scrambled. She stated she doesn't get the food she orders because the kitchen staff never answers the phone. She stated she makes sure to order before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional food safety standards. Additionally, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation practices for the kitchen. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 115 Findings include: a) Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) policy #22 titled Ware washing states: All dishware, service ware, and utensils will be cleaned and sanitized after each use. All dish machine water temperatures will be maintained in accordance with manufacturer recommendations for high-temperature or low-temperature machines. Temperature and / or sanitizer concentration logs will be completed, as appropriate. HCSG policy #25 titled Authorized Kitchen Personnel stated: All authorized personnel must wear appropriate head coverings while in the kitchen or production (hair off the shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap, and facial hair properly restrained). HCSG policy #19 titled Food Storage states: All Time /…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store and dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Trash was found on the sidewalk outside the facility service entrance. The lid for the kitchen trash can was off during three (3) different observations of the kitchen, during the survey process. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents at the facility. Facility census: 115. Findings include: a) Healthcare Services Group policy #28 titled Environment states: All food preparation areas, food service areas, and dining areas will be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. All trash will be contained in covered, leak proof containers that prevent cross-contamination. An observation on 06/17/26 at 12:01 PM revealed the trash can located in the kitchen near the handwashing sink was full of garbage and the lid was not secured. The Dietary Account Manager #11 closed the lid. Some coffee grounds from the overflowing trash had spilled into the handwashing sink. At 12:11 PM on 06/17/26, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate. This was true for four (4) of 41 sampled resident reviewed during the long term care survey. Resident #10's medical record was inaccurate pertaining to Medex Boots. Resident #11's medical record was inaccurate pertaining to a left arum support cushion. Resident #101 and #117's medical record was inccurate pertaining to amount of house supplement consumed. Resident Identifiers: #101, #117, #10, and #11. Facility Census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #117 An observation of Resident #117 in her room beginning at appx 10:30 am on 06/22/26 found the resident was resting quietly with her eye closed. Her house supplement was on her bedside table, and the resident had not drunk it. A review of her Medication Administration Record at this time found the percentage drunk had not been documented. At approximately 10:57 am the MAR was again reviewed and showed the nurse had documented the resident had drunk 100 percent of her house supplement. The house…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections regarding resident ambulatory equipment and the screening for tuberculosis. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #102, #126, #37, #110, #36 and #98. Facility Census: 115 Findings included: a) Resident #102 Resident wheelchair, Geri-chair and rollator/walker: During an interview with Resident #102 on 06/16/2026 at 3:33 PM, it was found that Resident #102's wheel chair (w/c) had rips and tears across the front edges of the seat exposing the inner padding. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/16/2026 at 3:45 PM, she confirmed the exposed padding of Resident # 102's w/c she removed the chair and stated she would order her a new one. b) Resident #36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health. This was true for Two (2) of Two (2) residents reviewed related to foot health. Resident Identifiers: Resident #27 and #22. Facility Census: 115. Findings include: a) Resident #27 06/16/2026 8:56 AM Interview with Resident #27. He stated I need to see a podiatrist. His feet look bad. 06/17/26 9:31 AM I asked the DON to go and speak to Resident #27 with me and for her to look as his feet. After speaking to Resident #27 and looking at his feet, she agreed that the facility is not following the Physicians orders, or the care plan for Residents #27 Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care of his feet. She stated I will get him an appointment scheduled with a podiatrist today. Resident #27 has a physician order for: Podiatry obtain consult as needed / indicated and treatment for patient for health and comfort. Resident #27 care plan states: Focus: Resident requires assistance / is dependent for ADL care. Date Initiated: 07/18/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration each resident's preferences and physician's orders. Resident identifier: #22. Facility census: 115 Findings include: a) Resident #22 On 06/16/26 at 1:13 PM the south short meal cart arrived for lunch, and at 1:15 PM, Resident #22's meal tray was served without the additional sandwich and additional serving of fruit per the physician's orders dated 05/19/26. Resident #22's meal tray was served without the additional sandwich and additional serving of fruit per the physician's orders dated 05/19/26. This order was put in place due to Resident #22 having significant weight loss. Resident #22 was admitted on [DATE] at 106 pounds. Her last documented weight was on 06/10/26 and she weighed 86.2 pounds. She had lost a total of 19.8 pounds, which is 18.7% of her total body weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — patternHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #46 received ongoing opportunities to participate in meaningful activities consistent with her interests, and preferences. Specifically, following a significant change in condition after a fall resulting in multiple fractures, the facility failed to revise the resident's activity care plan and failed to provide consistent, individualized activity interventions. This resulted in a decline in activity participation and social isolations. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for quality of life during the complaint survey. Resident identifier #46. Facility Census 113.a) Record review Resident #46A record review on 03/17/26 at 9:30 AM, revealed that Resident #46 had a fall on 02/18/26 and was sent to a local emergency room for pain to her right and left legFurther record review of the Diagnostic Radiology reports from the hospital showed the following:Left Femur:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a 30-day discharge notice to a resident prior to their discharge. This failed practice had the potential to affect a minimal number of residents within the long-term care facility. Resident identifier: #98 Facility Census 113. Findings include:On 03/10/26 the State Agency received a complaint indicating Resident #98 was being discharged to a hotel on this date. The complainant indicated the facility told the resident they would pay for the first 28 days but after that the resident was on his own. The complainant indicated the resident did not have any income and was not sure how he would eat or get his medications. Record review completed on 03/18/26 revealed the following:A Social Service note dated 03/06/26 documented discharge planning discussions and a referral to the Take Me Home program at the resident's request.An assessment note dated 03/10/26 indicated discharge plan documentation was completed.A Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview the facility failed to update an activity care plan after Resident #46 had a significant change in her participation. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for activities during the complaint survey process. Resident identifier #46. Facility Census 113.Findings Include:a) Resident #46A record review on 03/17/26 at 9:30 AM, revealed Resident #46 had a fall on 02/18/26 and was sent to a local emergency room for pain to her right and left legFurther record review of the Diagnostic Radiology reports from the hospital showed the following:Left Femur: Anterior apex angulated fracture of the distal femur diametaphyseal fracture with impaction.Right Knee: Impaction and comminuted anterior apex angulated fracture distal fifth metaphysis present. Osteopenia noted. During an interview on 03/18/26 at 11:40 AM, Resident #46 who has capacity and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 stated, Nobody understands what this has done to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to provide a program of activities to meet the interest and needs of Resident #46 who has had a significant change in her activity participation. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for activities during the complaint survey. Resident identifier #46. Facility Census: 113. Findings Include:a) Resident #46A record review on 03/17/26 at 9:30 AM, revealed that Resident #46 had a fall on 02/18/26 and was sent to a local emergency room for pain to her right and left legFurther record review of the Diagnostic Radiology reports from the hospital showed the following:Left Femur: Anterior apex angulated fracture of the distal femur diametaphyseal fracture with impaction.Right Knee: Impaction and comminuted anterior apex angulated fracture distal fifth metaphysis present. Osteopenia noted. During an interview on 03/18/26 at 11:40 AM, Resident #46 who has capacity and a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to manage pain in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of pain. Resident Identifier: #14. Facility census: 117. Findings included:a) Resident #14 The facility's policy titled Pain Management with effective date 01/01/04 and revision date 03/24/25 stated that reasons for as needed (PRN) pain medications would be documented. Review of Resident #14's physician's orders showed the resident was receiving the following scheduled pain medications: -Morphine sulfate extended relief tablet, 10 mg, three (3) times a day for pain, ordered 01/18/26-Morphine sulfate extended relief tablet, 60 mg, two (2) tablets, three (3) times a day for pain, ordered 01/31/26 Resident #14 also had an order to document the pain level and non-pharmaceutical interventions for pain every shift. Pain was assessed on a score of 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the highest pain imaginable. Resident #14 was also ordered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and food tray temperatures, the facility failed to serve food to residents that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature. Based on resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure hot foods were served hot and cold foods were served cold. This failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) hallways tested for food tray temperatures throughout the complaint survey process. Resident #35. Facility census: 117.Findings include: a) The facility was not taking and documenting all food temperatures prior to sending the food to the residents. The facility was also sending cold food out above the FDA Food Code temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit. The Healthcare Services Group policy 016 titled Food Preparation shows the following: All foods are prepared in accordance with the FDA Food Code. Cold foods at 41 degrees F or below and hot foods at 135 degrees F or above before it leaves the kitchen.This surveyor asked for a copy of the service line checklist dated 02/01/2026 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the proper sanitation practices for the kitchen and the food preparation equipment. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 117. Findings include: a) The Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) policy 019 titled Food storage: Cold Foods shows the following: All Time / Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. All foods will be stored wrapped or in a covered container, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The HCSG policy 027 titled Equipment shows the following: All foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's directions and training materials. All staff members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide accurate and complete medical records for four (4) of 24 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Transfer assessments were not accurate for Residents #78 and #7. Tube feeding documentation was not accurate for Resident #47. Additionally, the activities assessment for Resident #21 was not completed by a qualified staff member. Resident Identifiers: #78, #7,#47, and #21. Facility census: 117.Findings included:a) Resident #78 On 02/18/26 at 3:30 PM, a review was completed for Resident #78. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 12/26/25. However, the transfer form had the incorrect date of 10/31/25. On 02/19/26 at 10:00 AM, the Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) #156 confirmed the transfer form had the incorrect date noted. b) Resident #7 On 02/18/26 at 4:30 PM, a review was completed for Resident #7. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the quarterly assessments for restraint usage for Resident #6. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of restraints. Resident Identifier: #6. Facility Census: 117. Findings Include: a) Resident #6 On 02/18/26 at 8:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #6. The review found the following physician's order dated 04/22/25, Restraint: Positioning device/belt to w/c (wheelchair) while up in w/c for dx (diagnosis) of Cerebral Palsy and involuntary movements of core/ trunk area. Release device/belt every 2 (two) hours for repositioning every 2 (two) hours for seat belt to chair. Also, the review found the last restraint evaluation/reduction was completed on 05/29/25. The evaluation/reducation should be completed quarterly. On 02/18/26 at 10:20 AM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the evaluation was not completed quarterly. b) Policy On 02/18/26 at 9:45 AM, a review of the facility policy entitled, Restraints: Use of was completed. Under section 6, states,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifiers: #3. Facility census: 117. Findings included: a) Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's medical records showed diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and exposure to disaster, war and other hostilities were documented on 01/20/26. On 02/17/26, the following focus was initiated on the resident's comprehensive care plan: Resident reports past experience of trauma as evidenced by: Feeling upset when reminded of a stressful experience from the past related to PTSD. On 02/18/2026 at 11:27 AM, Corporate Nurse #156 confirmed Resident #3 had not been care planned for PTSD until 02/17/26. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey process.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews th facilty failed to revise care plans related to one (1) on one(1) activities and PEG tube length. This failed practive was found true for two (2) of 24 residents care plans reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #50 and #47. Facility Census: 117Findings include: a) Resident #50 On 02/16/26 at 11:27 AM a Review of the participation record for Resident #50 showed most activities Provided were one-on-one activities. further record review of Resident #50's care plan revealed nothing in the care plan for Resident #50 to receive one (1) on (1) activities. Record review completed on 02/17/26 Revealed the one (1) on one (1) list provided from Activity Director (AD) #14 showed the resident was on the one (1) on one (1) program list to receive one (1) on one (1) activities. During an Interview with AD #14 on 02/17/26 at 3:40 PM she confirmed the one-on-one activities were not in the resident's care plan. b) Resident #47 Review of Resident #47's physician's order showed an order written on 02/06/26 to check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen settings for Resident #20. Facility census 117. a) Resident #20. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with physician orders. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the ordered rate. On 02/18/26 at 9:19 a.m., observation of Resident #20 revealed oxygen delivered via nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. Record review of the physician's orders indicated an active order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. On 02/18/26 at 9:19 a.m., interview with Nurse #111 confirmed the oxygen was set at 4 liters per minute and verified the current physician order was for 2 liters per minute. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that any increase in oxygen flow rate would require documentation of a change in condition and updated physician orders. However, as of 9:40 a.m. on 02/18/26, review of the medical record did not reveal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing information was accurate for one (1) of 20 days reviewed, resulting in incorrect staffing and census information being displayed. Facility Census: 117Findings include:Review of the facility's nurse staffing posting on 02/18/26 for staffing dated 07/06/25 showed the posted Hours Per Patient Day (HPPD): 2.19 and the posted facility census: 109 residentsDuring surveyor review, the facility administrator provided verified staffing documentation and census reports showing actual HPPD for 07/06/25 was 2.58 and actual facility census for 07/06/25 was 105 residentsDuring an interview the discrepancies were reviewed with the facility administrator On 02/19/26 at 11:00 AM when the administrator confirmed the staffing posting contained incorrect HPPD and census information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the residents received the proper portion sizes. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents and was a random opportunity for discovery found during the completion of the dining observation pathway during the long-term care survey process. Resident #44 and #91. Facility Census: 117. Findings include: a) The Healthcare Services Group policy 004 titled Menus shows the following: Menus will be planned in advance to meet the nutritional needs of the residents / patients in accordance with established national guidelines. Menus will be developed to meet the criteria through the use of an approved menu planning guide. Menu Cycles will include standardized recipes. Menu cycles will include nutrient analysis to ensure that all clients nutritional needs are met in accordance with the most recent edition of the Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine, National Academics, and the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020 - 2025 edition. Menus will be served as written,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's received a therapeutic diet for a renal diet and the 2 gram sodium diet. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #42, #56, #80, #78, #132, # 90, #98, #105 and #117 . Facility census: 117.Findings include: a) 02/18/2026 12:15 PM A review of Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) policy 008 titled Therapeutic Diets revealed Therapeutic diet is defined as a diet ordered by a physician, or delegated registered licensed dietitian, as part of the treatment for a disease or clinical condition. The purpose of the therapeutic diet is to eliminate or decrease specific nutrients in the diet, or to increase specific nutrients in the diet. All nine (9) residents that were on a Renal diet and / or the 2 gram sodium diet, did not receive low sodium marinara meat sauce for the lunch meal on 02/28/2026, as per the recipe and diet guide used by the facility, The tray ticket also showed that they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate comprehensive care plan in the area of medication refusals. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of three (3) residents in the survey sample. Resident Identifier: #111. Facility Census: 110.Findings included:a) Resident #111Review of Resident #111's medication administration record (MAR) and progress notes showed the resident began refusing medications on 09/04/25, the day after admission to the facility. Medications refused included atorvastin for hyperlipidemia, dapagliflozin for diabetes, divalproex for depression, famotidine for gastroesophageal reflux disease, insulin for diabetes, losartan for hypertension, melatonin for sleeplessness, metformin for diabetes, metoprolol for hypertension, and trazodone for depression. The medication refusals were frequent. On 11/13/25, the following focus was written on Resident #111's comprehensive care plan, Resident/Patient is resistive to care related to: Alzheimer's Disease hx [history] of resisting care, refusing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. Psychiatric telemedicine notes contained an inaccurate history of present illness (HPI) for Resident #111. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #111. Facility Census: 110.Findings included:a) Resident #111 Review of Resident #111's medical records showed the resident was seen by psychiatric telemedicine services on [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. Each of the notes written during these sessions had the following paragraph for history of present illness (HPI): 92 -year-old widowed female with a hx [history] of dementia, depression, anxiety. She was initially admitted to [facility] on [DATE] after an acute hospital stay at [hospital name]. [Resident's name] ambulates without assistance. She has three children, one is deceased . Son, [name] is HCS [health care surrogate] and supportive. However, the resident's age, admission date, first name, and HCS's name were incorrect in this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards for 1 out of 26 residents. Facility census 112. Scope and Severity D On 11/11/25 at approximately 11:07 p.m., observed a medicine cup with 1 pill in it located on the bedside table of resident #8. I then notified the Director of Nursing (DON) to come to the room and verify that there was a medication cup with 1 pill in it on the bedside table. The DON verified that the medication cup was on resident #8 bedside table. The DON and myself went and checked 26 residents (Rms 1-16) and there was only 1 out of 26 residents that had the medication cup with meds left at their bedside. The DON verified that medication pill pass was performed by employee # 81. The medication identified was a 1/2 tab of Senokot.On 11/11/25 at approximately 11:08 p.m., interview the DON verified that employee #81 did leave a medication cup with a 1/2 tablet of Senokot on the bedside table of resident #81. This deficiency was also again verified by the DON and acknowledged by the Administrator upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that narcotics in the facility were managed and controlled in a safe manner. This is true for eleven (11) of eleven (11) residents reviewed during the survey. All residents that receive pain medication in the facility have the potential to be affected. This will be cited as past non compliance because the facility identified what had happened and took immediate steps to correct the failure to ensure it does not reoccur. All components of the of plan of correction were completed prior to this survey beginning. This did occur, however due to the facility identifying the missing medications and replacing them immediately for the Residents that remained in the facility no Residents were harmed by this incident. Resident Identifier: #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12. Facility Census: 112 Findings Include:a) Residents #11 and #12Resident #11On 10/15/25 at 9:10 AM, record review of a reportable facility incident revealed that on 06/28/25 when a staff member attempted to reorder Resident #11's Hydrocodone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete all Physicians orders for wound treatment. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during this investigation. Resident Identifier: #1 Facility Census: #112 Findings Include:a) Resident #1On 10/16/25 at 9:10 AM record review of Resident #1 orders and Treatment Administration Records (TAR) for August, September and October 2025 found missing documentation as shown below. All orders and TAR's were reviewed for the period of 08/01/25 - 10/31/25. None of the following Physician orders were completed on 10/09/25, 10/16/25, 10/21/25 or 10/22/25.Clean DTI (deep tissue injury) to left buttocks with wound cleaner, pat dry, apply skin prep to area and leave open to air every day shift.Clean left outer foot (amputation site) with wound cleaner, pat dry, apply Betadine and leave open to air every day shiftClean venous ulcer to left dorsum 1st digit (hallux) with wound cleaner, pat dry, apply Betadine and leave open to air every day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to deploy sufficient direct care staff to meet the needs of the resident population of the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #94, #58, #51, #85, #91, and #84. Facility census: 111. Findings include: a) Resident #94 On 04/13/25 at approximately 3:09 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #94. Resident #94 stated the facility was very understaffed. Resident #94 said, They keep telling me they're hiring people, but no one ever stays. The ones that don't do their job, they keep because they can't keep other people, so they have no choice but to keep them. At approximately 9:05 PM on 4/14/25, the call light for Resident #94's room was observed ringing in the North Hall of the facility. At approximately 9:16 PM, Resident #94 was observed yelling Hello multiple times from inside his room, but did not receive an answer. During this time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #36 and Nurse Aide (NA) #21 were on the hallway. LPN #36 was passing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to to receive mail on Saturdays was honored. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure stated, The Recreation Director or designee will: .1.2 Ensure that mail is delivered to the person unopened or postmarked (for outgoing mail) within 24 hours, including Saturdays. b) On 04/14/25 at 02:05 PM during the Resident Council Meeting, the residents reported that mail was not delivered on Saturdays. c) On 04/15/25 at 10:13 AM, the Administrator confirmed mail was to be delivered on Saturdays. The Administrator stated, Mail was supposed to be delivered. She reported the two activities directors will begin working the weekends since they had recently had an assistant leave and there are two open positions in that department. The Administrator reported she will educate and begin an audit for the residents to receive mail timely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow administration directions for medications prescribed for the control of phosphorous levels for dialysis patients. This was true for 5 of 5 residents on dialysis. Resident Identifiers: Residents #33, #88, #94, #105 and #108. Facility census:111. Findings Include: a) Resident #33 Record review and interview on 04/13/25 at 2:35 PM revealed, Resident #33 is a [AGE] year-old female on hemodialysis diagnosed with the following conditions: Chronic systolic heart failure Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia Type 2 diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy End-stage renal disease on hemodialysis Dilated cardiomyopathy History of nicotine dependence Hypertension Morbid obesity Gastroesophageal reflux disease Anemia A review of the resident's medication orders on 04/15/25 at approximately 11:55 AM revealed Resident #33 was prescribed: Renvela Oral Tablet 800 MG (Sevelamer Carbonate). Give 3 tablets by mouth before meals for end stage renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure each resident received the proper portion size of pork during the evening meal on 04/16/25. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents and was random opportunity for discovery found during the completion of the kitchen pathway during the long-term care survey process. Facility Census: 111. Findings Include: On 04/16/25 at 5:32 PM the surveyor was observing meal service from the steam table in the facility's kitchen. [NAME] #130 was serving the food from the steam table. She was observed using tongs to serve the pork. The Director of Operations (DOO) was asked how she was sure the pork she was serving was two ounces (OZ) she stated she should be using a 2 oz scoop and not tongs. She corrected the situation; however, the North Short Hall and the South Short Hall had already been served. A review of the menu found each resident should be served 2 ounces of pork.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all residents received meals at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community. The lunch meal on 06/04/25 was served 45 minutes late to 19 residents due to the facility running out of prepared food. This was true for Resident #95, #3, #68, #60, #90, #21, #29, #24, #56, #6, #61, #5, #41, #79, #38, #58, #36, #45, and #49. Facility Census: 101 Findings Include: a) An observation of the lunch meal began at 12:00 PM on 06/04/25 found the facility was serving ham, macaroni and cheese and beets as the main meal for the residents. At 1:10 PM [NAME] #1 stated, I ran out of food. I'm going to have to make more. The Corporate Director of Operations then began preparing and directing the staff on what to make to continue to the feed the remaining 18 residents. The Corporate Director of Operations, indicated they did not know what happened. They said they made more than the production sheet called for but was still short on servings. The final resident was served at 1:56 PM on 06/04/25 which was 46 minutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were adhered to in the residents' shower room. This failed practice had the potential for infection of a limited number of residents. This was true for one (1) of two (2) shower rooms inspected during the survey process. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) During an inspection of the male and female shower rooms, accompanied by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #26 on 04/14/25 at approximately 1:20 PM, five bottles of unlabeled shampoo bottles were observed in the male shower room. LPN #26 confirmed the bottles of shampoo were not labeled with any resident names. On 04/14/25 at approximately 2:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed all unlabeled shampoo bottles had been removed from the shower room.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #94 was treated in a dignified manner, by allowing him to sit in a soiled brief for an extended period of time. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: 94. Facility census: 111. Findings included: A) Observation At approximately 9:05 PM on 4/14/25, the call light for Resident #94's room was observed ringing in the North hall of the facility. At approximately 9:16 PM, Resident #94 was observed yelling Hello multiple times from inside his room, but did not receive an answer. During this time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #36 and Nurse Aide (NA) #21 were on the hallway. LPN #36 was passing medications and NA #21 was observed going back and forth between other resident rooms. At approximately 9:20 PM, NA #21 went to a soiled linen bin outside of Resident #94's room, at which time he yelled , Can I get an aide please? NA #21 placed items into the soiled linen bin, walked down the hallway, and did not acknowledge the resident. At approximately 9:23 PM NA #13 entered the Hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to voice a grievance to the facility without fear of reprisal for Resident #58. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #58. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) Policy Review The facility's policy and procedure stated, The patient/resident (hereinafter patient) has the right to voice grievances to the Center or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other patients, and other concerns regarding their Center stay. b) Resident Council A resident Council Meeting was held on 04/14/25 at 02:05 PM. The residents expressed you couldn't voice a concern at times without worrying that someone will get back at them. Several residents reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26 and Resident #70 were not neglected. Resident #70 asked for a snack for over 30 minutes she was eventually given a snack but it was the wrong consistency. The nurse aide then had to take it from her which upset the resident. The facility also failed to give Resident #26 his medication even though it was available in the pyxis machine. This was true for two (2) of seven (7) residents reviewed for the care area of abuse during the long term care survey. Resident Identifiers: #70 and #26. Facility Census: 111. Findings Included: a) Resident #26 An interview with Resident #26 on 04/13/25 at 2:44 PM found the Licensed Practical Nurse's (LPN) often let him run out of medication and he don't get it until it comes in from the pharmacy. When asked if knew what medications he runs out of he stated, I don't know the names of them, but I know one of them was for my restless leg syndrome. He indicated it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #13 upon discharge from the facility. This was true for one (1) of thirty-eight (38) residents. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #13. Resident Identifier: #13. Facility Census : 111. Findings included: a) Resident #13 Resident #13's date of stay was from 10/23/24 through 11/11/24. The following Minimum Data Sets were completed for Medicare: Entry/MDS 3.0, Medicare 5 -Day/MDS 3.0 and admission -None PPS/MDS 3.0. A discharge MDS was not found during the record review. On 04/16/25 at 1:34 PM, the state surveyor interviewed MDS Coordinator #77. MDS Coordinator #77 confirmed a discharge MDS had not been completed. The MDS Coordinator stated, I did miss it. and We will fix it.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented regarding pain management interventions for Resident #42, and regarding tracheostomy care for Resident #111. This was true for two (2) of 38 resident care plans reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #42, #111. Facility census: 111. Findings included: a) Resident #42 Resident #42 is receiving hospice services due to an end stage diagnosis of History of CVA (cerebrovascular accident). Resident #42 has an order for: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML. Give 10 mg by mouth every two (2) hours as needed for pain/dyspnena. Give 0.50 ML. Hold for Sedation 0.50 ml, every two hours as needed for pain. At approximately 11:30 AM on 4/13/25, during observations in the North hall of the facility, Resident #42 was observed to be yelling out. Review of the resident's record on 4/13/25, it was noted some indicators for pain were yelling out, restlessness, tenseness. Resident #42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, residen interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assist dependent residents with activities of daily living (ADL's) in accordance with the residents assessed needs for care. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for ADL care.Resident Identifiers: #416 and #85. Facility Census: 111. Findings Included: a) Resident #416 On 04/16/25 at 11:28 AM, a review of Resident #416's toileting / toileting hygiene documentation in November 2024 found: --Day shift- three (3) entries of 97- Not applicable in 30 days. --Evening shift- three (3) entries of 97- Not applicable in 30 days. --Night shift- 12 entries of 97- Not applicable in only 30 days. During an Interview on 04/16/25 at 12:08 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no documentation that Resident #416 received Toileting hygiene as needed. b) Resident #87 At approximately, 12:45 PM on 4/13/25, an interview was conducted with Resident #87. During the interview, the resident was asked if he received assistance from the staff with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for no straws for Resident #10 and failed to ensure Resident #26 received medication as ordered. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #10 and #26. Facility Census: 111. Findings included: a) During the initial interview process on 04/14/25 at 11:00 AM, the state surveyor observed a straw in Resident #10's water pitcher. Additional observations with the straw in the resident's water pitcher were completed at 12:16 PM, and 12:40 PM. The resident reported she drinks water out of the pitcher. Review of the resident's eating task found the resident to be set-up to independent for eating. At 12:50 PM, Registered Nurse #69 reported the resident had no straws because they were a high risk for aspiration. The straw was not removed at that time. The straw was observed to be removed from the water pitcher at 1:18 PM. Registered Nurse #69 stated, I know her well. At 01:45 PM, the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a newly admitted resident's indwelling catheter, and failed to obtain a physician's order for the care and maintenance of the catheter. In addition, the facility failed to provide the appropriate catheter care to prevent potential Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI's). This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for catheter care. Resident Identifier: #266. Facility census: 111. Findings Included: a) Resident #266 During an interview on 04/13/25 at approximately 2:14 PM, Resident #266 stated she was looking forward to getting her catheter removed. Upon being asked if the facility provided catheter care, resident stated the staff usually emptied her catheter bag when it filled up. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) data presented to the surveyors upon entry indicated Resident #266 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS did not show Resident #266 had an indwelling urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident received mental health referral and treatment. This was true for 1 (one) of 38 (thirty-eight) residents reviewed during this annual survey process. Resident identifier: #110. Facility census: 111 Findings included: A) Resident #110 A review of Resident #110's medical record found the following: Diagnosis Included: Post traumatic stress disorder Anxiety Disorder Depression A review of the MDS quarterly assessment on 04/03/25, recorded the following: Section D - Mood D0160: Total severity score of 18 D0170 Social Isolation was marked as always feeling lonely or isolated from those around you. Section E - Behavior Verbal behaviors towards others occuring 4 - 5 days per week Section I - Active Diagnoses Psychiatric/Mood Disorder: Anxiety Disorder Depression Post Traumatic Stress Disorder The most recent PASARR: Was completed on 02/04/25 by (Name of Local Hospital) and contained the following: Q23 Medical conditions/symptoms: Mental disorders None Section III: MI/MR Assessment Current diagnosis: None is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled to enable them to identify and correct any possible drug diversions. There were some discrepancies related to Resident #97's controlled substance log. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #97. Facility Census: 111. Findings Include: a) Resident #97 A review of Resident #87's medical record on the morning of 04/16/25 found the resident was ordered Hydrocodone 5-325 by mouth every 6 hours for pain, The medication administration record for the month of 03/2025 and the month of 04/2025 along with the controlled substance log coinciding with these months was requested. Upon review of the MAR and the controlled substance log it was found on 03/21/25, a nurse signed out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed and acted on the Consulting Pharmacist's recommendations. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed and documented a response to the recommendations. This was true for five (5) of five (5) residents surveyed. Resident Identifier: Resident #17, # 28, #53, #74 and #87. Facility Census: 111. Findings include: a) Resident #17 On 04/14/25 at 3:11 PM a review of the Consulting Pharmacist's review for Resident #17's medications revealed the following: The Consulting Pharmacist's medication review on 09/20/24 showed the following recommendations: Resident is on Quetiapine 25 MG at bedtime for muscle weakness. This is not an appropriate diagnosis. Recommendation: An antipsychotic medication should be used only for the following conditions/diagnoses. Please check the appropriate indication for this resident: Huntington Disease Mood disorders (e.g. bipolar disorder, severe depression refractory to other therapies and/or with psychotic features) Medical illnesses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #70's medication regimen was free from unnecessary antipsychotic medications. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #70. Facility's Census: 111. Findings Include: a) Resident #70 On 04/14/25 at 9:05 PM the facility was entered on the night shift due to resident complaints of care on the night shift. Upon entrance to the facility Resident #70 was observed sitting in the doorway of the Cafe, the resident was yelling for help and asking for a snack. She later began asking for a specific snack of a peanut butter sandwich. Numerous staff were in the area and could have easily heard her asking for a snack. This continued until about 9:33 PM when Nurse Aide (NA) #55 walked by and she asked her for a peanut butter sandwich. NA #55 then stated to another employee, I think she is puree I will get her an apple sauce or pudding in just one (1) minute. Shortly after this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to update orders to discontinue dialysis access care, and monitoring of the dialysis access graft/fistula. In addition, the facility failed to update orders and a care plan when a C-collar was discontinued. Resident Identifiers: #88, and #10. Facility Census: 111. Findings Include; a) Resident #88 During an interview, on 04/15/25 at approximately 1:20 PM, Resident #88 stated the dialysis access in her right upper arm was no longer patent. The resident stated he now had a dialysis catheter in her right upper chest, which was used during hemodialysis treatments. Record review on 04/15/25 at approximately 2:15 PM revealed the following order dated 10/08/24: External hemodialysis catheter 2 lumens (location) right chest wall with transparent dressing. DO NOT Change END caps. Further record review revealed the following orders dated 08/31/24: AV fistula/graft location: right upper extremity Change AV fistula/graft site dressing every Thursday Monitor AV fistula/graft site for S/S infection, edema, bleeding and upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were implemented within accepted standards of care. Three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of bed rails did not have current orders for bed rails. One (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of bed rails did not have valid informed consent for bed rails. Resident identifiers: #12, #15, #96. Facility census: 111. Findings include: a) Policy and Procedures The facility's policy titled Bed Rails with effective date 07/01/18 and revision date 09/01/22 stated if the Bed Rail Evaluation determines that the patient would benefit from side rails, an order for the bed rails would be obtained from the physician or advanced practice provider (APP). The policy also stated informed consent would be obtained from the resident or, if applicable, the resident representative. b) Resident #12 Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were implemented within accepted standards of care. Three (3) of three (3)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure foot care was provided to dependent residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of foot care. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 111. Findings include: a) Resident #12 On 07/18/24, The Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification received that Resident #12's toenails had not been cut since he was admitted to the facility. Review of Resident #12's medical records showed the resident was admitted in February 2024. The resident had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. No nail care was documented in the medical records. On 08/28/24 at 9:08 AM, Resident #12's toenails were observed with assistance from Registered Nurse (RN) #59. They were somewhat long. The left great toe was discolored and was cream and light gray colored. RN #59 stated the podiatry service comes to the building every three (3) months. RN #59 stated Resident #12 would be seen by podiatry on their next visit. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to residents and to maintain an environment free of accident hazards. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one resident reviewed for accident hazards during the survey process. Resident identifier: #111. Facility Census 111. Finding Include: a) Resident #111 A review of the facilities reportables, on 08/29/24 at 8:45 AM, revealed a reportable dated 06/28/24 alleging Resident #11 was witnessed drinking from a bottle of wound cleanser which was left on the crash cart. A record review on 08/29/24 at 8:50 AM, revealed a general progress note date 06/28/24 which read as follows: Resident was witnessed drinking from a bottle of wound cleanser; another resident reported to nursing resident had consumed content from a bottle, staff immediately responded; Resident denied pain or distress; no obvious signs of GI discomfort noted upon assessment; resident denied burning or discomfort to mouth; mouth care provided; resident continued to repeat I am o.k.; Resident has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Physician-ordered medication parameters were not followed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect (1) of four (4) residents reviewed during the investigation. Resident identifier: #39. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #39 Resident #39 had the following physician-ordered medication parameters: - Amlodipine besylate, 10 mg, one (1) tablet by mouth one (1) time a day for hypertension. Hold for pulse below 60 or SBP [systolic blood pressure] less than 110 or DBP [diastolic blood pressure] less than 70 and notify provider, ordered on 02/23/23. - Propranolol, 20 mg, one (1) tablet by mouth two (2) times a day for hypertension. Hold for pulse below 60 or SBP less than 110 or DBP less than 70 and notify provider, ordered on 01/08/24. According to the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR), at the following dates and times, amlodipine besylate was administered despite the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure services to meet professional standards of care. A medication labeled by the pharmacy to be used for a specific resident was used for another resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery found during medication administration observation. Resident identifiers: #4 and #52. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Residents #4 and #52 The facility's policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines dated January 2024 gave the following procedure: - Medications supplied for one resident are never administered to another resident. On 07/18/24 at 7:38 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #28 was observed administering medications to Resident #4. The resident had an order written on 06/25/24 for Lactulose, 10 grams in 15 milliliters concentration, give 45 ml by mouth two (2) times a day for hyperammonemia (high ammonia level). LPN #28 could not find lactulose for Resident #4. There was an unopened Lactulose bottle with a label for Resident #52. The Lactulose concentration was 10 grams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a qualified activity professional for recreational services. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect all residents. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Activity Professional On 12/12/2023 at 3:00 PM the appointed Recreation Director (RD) #105 stated she has not had the activity professional qualification course but was set to have it in the upcoming January 2024 class. During an Interview on 12/13/2023 at 10:00 AM the Administrator stated the RD was enrolled into the Modular Education Program for Activity Professionals (MEPAP) course in November 2023 through National Certification Council for Activity Professional (NCCAP). Record review showed a copy of the enrolment email for RD #105 to attend the (MEPAP) course with an enrollment date of 11/03/23. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 11:03 AM Activity Consultant Certified (ACC) #301 Instructor verified the facilities recreation director was enrolled in MEPAP the course starting January 8th, 2024. ACC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident to resident altercations were reported to all the proper State Agencies. This is true for four (4) of ten (10) incidents reviewed for resident to resident alterations. Resident Identifiers: Resident #83, Resident #92, Resident #79, Resident #40, Resident #95, Resident #11 and Resident #54. Facility Census: 110. Findings Included: A review of a facility policy titled OPS300 Abuse Prohibition: with a revision date of 10/24/22 read as follows. .Process: .7.4 Report allegations to the appropriate state and local authority(s) involving neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source) suspected criminal activity, and misappropriation of patient property within 24 hours if the event does not result in serious bodily injury. .9. The Administrator or designee will: .9.2 Report findings of all the completed investigations within five (5) working days to the Department of Health using the state on-line reporting system or state approved forms. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed, who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received services to maintain personal hygiene. Resident Identifiers: Resident #105. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #105 During a record review on 09/26/23 at 7:30 PM, Resident #105 medical record reviews revealed a showers schedule indicated Resident #105 should receive showers on Mondays, Wednesdays and Saturdays. Further record review revealed Resident #105 received showers on the following days: -09/02/23 -09/06/23 -09/10/23 -09/13/23 -09/16/23 -09/18/23 Bed Bath -09/22/23 Bed Bath This documentation indicated Resident #105 did not receive a shower on the following scheduled days and was coded Not Applicable: -09/04/23 -09/09/23 -09/11/23 -09/18/23 -09/20/23 -09/23/23 -09/25/23 During the record review on 09/26/23 8:02 PM, Medical record review revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/17/23 revealed the following: Section G, titled Activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Physician-ordered medication parameters were not followed for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed receiving antihypertensive medications. Resident identifier: #105. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Resident #105 Review of Resident #105's physician's orders showed an order written on 09/08/23 for carvedilol 3.125 mg, one (1) tablet by mouth, two (2) times a day, for hypertension, at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM. The medication was to be held if the resident's blood pressure was less than 110/60 or heart rate below 60. Review of Resident #105 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2023 showed the resident's blood pressure was not recorded on the [DATE]/08/23, 09/09/23, and 09/10/23. According to the MAR, the resident's carvedilol had been administered at 8:00 AM on 09/08/23, at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM on 09/09/23, and at 8:00 AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide nutritional adequacy by providing inconsistent portions of the food to maintain perimeters of health. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Facility census: 110. Findings included: a) Inconsistent Portions During a tour of the kitchen on 09/26/23 at 12:30 PM with the Director of Dining Services (DDS)#23 revealed the following issues: -During the observation [NAME] #27 was preparing the lunch meal trays from the serving steam table of meatball subs. The meatball subs were getting two (2) meatballs, some three (3), then she was cutting some in half and placing them on the buns. The DDS #23 stated the meatballs are not the 4 ounce size called for on the menu, I think those are bigger, was unable to tell this surveyor how many ounces was being provided to each resident. The menu stated two (2) four (4) ounce meatballs. -Cook #23 was serving french fries with a gloved hand and placing them on the Resident's plate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, staff, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was provided with the appropriate supplemental oxygen. This failed practice was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Resident identifier: #6. Facility census: 118. Findings included: Record review showed an order with start date of 10/31/22 for Oxygen at 2 liters/minute via Nasal Cannula continuous, every day and night shift. On 09/14/23 at observation was made of Resident #6 eating lunch in the dining hall sitting in her wheelchair. Resident #6 was noted not have any supplemental oxygen in use. Resident #6's wheelchair did not have any portable O2 attached for use and no portable tank was located within the dining area belonging to the Resident. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #45 was present in the dining room and verified Resident #6 was not wearing O2. LPN #45 stated, I have never seen [resident's first name] wear O2 while up in her wheelchair, but if the order says continuous then it should be on. Record review showed Resident #6 to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$149,858 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-03-18
- $25,500 — penalty dated 2026-03-18
- $54,438 — penalty dated 2025-04-16
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-08-29
- $37,184 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| STARCHER, CHRISTIANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/27/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $923K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 515087. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.