Majestic Care of Hopemont
150 Hopemont Drive, Terra Alta, WV 26764 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (304) 789-2411 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $57,116 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (95%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.7% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.2% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.2% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 11.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.9% | 15.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 39.2% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.5% | 22.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 63.2% | 13.4% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.22 | 1.84 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 45.5 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 95% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, medical record review, temperature log review, and facility reportable incident (FRI) review, and hospital record review the facility neglected to ensure one (1) of six (6) residents was not subjected to hot water temperatures of 134 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This failure resulted in physical harm to Resident #19. Resident #19 sustained second degree burns to left hand, bilateral lower extremities and feet, bilateral buttocks and scrotum. This created an immediate jeopardy situation that began on 01/04/24 at 7:12 PM when the resident was placed in the tub and ended on 01/07/24 at 6:54 PM when all hot water was shut off in the facility. All residents had the potential to be affected by the hot water temperatures. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 44. Findings included: a) Facility Reportable Incident (FRI) A facility reported incident was received at the state agency on 01/04/24. The report stated Nurse Aide (NA) #99 put Resident #19 into a whirlpool tub. She filled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, medical record review, temperature log review, facility reportable incident (FRI) review, and hospital record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of six (6) residents had an environment which was as free of accident hazards as was possible. Nurse Aide (NA) #99 failed to monitor the water temperature when filling the tub. In addition NA #99 failed to supervise this resident during the bathing process. After Resident #19 was placed in the tub, water at 134 degrees (F) was used to fill the tub. Resident #19 sustained second degree burns to the left hand, bilateral lower extremities and feet, bilateral buttocks and scrotum. This created an immediate jeopardy situation that began on 01/04/24 at 7:12 PM when the resident was placed in the water and it ended on 01/07/24 at 6:54 PM when the hot water in the facility was turned off. When the immediate jeopardy was removed the result was harm to Resident #19. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 44. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the orientation records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff and nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency skills and techniques necessary to care for resident needs. Registered Nurse #100 (RN) failed to render aid timely to Resident #19 who sustained third degree burns. A nurse aide (NA) failed to ensure one (1) of six (6) resident's safety during a bath. The nurse aide exposed the resident to water at 134 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This caused third degree burns to the resident. Resident identifier: #19. Staff identifiers: Registered Nurse (RN) #100, Nurse Aide #99. This failed practice created an immediate jeopardy situation that began on 01/04/24 when the resident was place in the bath and ended on 01/22/24 when all staff completed competencies on safe bathing. Water temperatures more than 110 degrees (F) were recorded from January 3, 2024, until the hot water access to resident care areas was shut down on 01/07/24 at 6:54 PM. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 44.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the licensee failed to maintain hot water mechanical equipment in safe operating condition. According to CMS guidelines exposure at water temperature of 133 degrees Fahrenheit can lead to third degree burns in 15 seconds. Resident #19 was bathed in 134 degrees Fahrenheit water. Resident #19 sustained second degree burns to his feet, legs, thigh, and hand. The staff responsible for monitoring water temperatures and maintaining equipment knew the hot water had measured more than 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) since January 2023. This caused an immediate jeopardy situation that began on 01/03/23 and ended on 01/07/24. This practice had the potential to affect all facility residents. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census 44. Findings included: a) Facility Reported Incident A facility reported incident was received at the state agency on 01/05/24. The report stated Nurse Aide #99 put Resident #19 into a whirlpool tub. She filled the tub to the knee level. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-02-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the licensee failed to maintain hot water mechanical equipment in safe operating condition. According to CMS guidelines exposure at water temperature of 133 degrees Fahrenheit (F) can lead to third degree burns in 15 seconds. Resident #19 was bathed in 134 degrees (F) water. Resident #19 sustained second degree burns to the left hand, bilateral lower extremeties, bilateral buttocks, and scrotum. The staff responsible for monitoring water temperatures and maintaining equipment knew the hot water had measured more than 110 degrees (F) since January 2023. This caused an immediate jeopardy situation that began on 01/03/23 and ended on 01/07/24. This practice had the potential to affect all facility residents. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census 44. Findings included: a) Facility Reported Incident A facility reported incident was received at the state agency on 01/05/24. The report stated Nurse Aide #99 put Resident #19 into a whirlpool tub. She filled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure menus meet the nutritional needs of residents and menus were followed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents: Resident Identifiers:. #1, #4, #5, #11, #15 and #18. Facility Census: 47.e)Resident #4 On 02/16/2026 at approximately 12:00 PM a meal tray was delivered to Resident #4 room. It was placed down and when opened the tray was observed to contain the following: Tray contained Full chicken breast (not cut up and not diet appropriate) Polenta Summer squash was missing and was subbed w/ spinach (not diet appropriate) Roll (not diet appropriate) Malt vinegar - missing Margarine - missing Chocolate pudding was missing and subbed out w/ brownie (not diet appropriate) Coffee Soy milk The Residents diet is Minced and moist with nectar thick liquids. This is a requirement per Speech therapy #77, who confirmed Resident #4 is a high aspiration risk and pockets their food. There were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form to meet individual needs. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #1, #8, #4 and #24. Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for Meal Supervision and Assistance stated, 5. Check the tray before serving it to the resident to be sure that it is the correct diet ordered and that the food consistency is appropriate to the resident's ability to chew and swallow. On 02/16/26, when asked what diet levels are served at the facility, Dietary Aide #94 reported they serve puree, ground, minced and moist, and bite-sized -and stated, I just call them all ground. On 02/16/26 at 2:09 PM, the State Surveyor interviewed the Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) regarding the diet consistencies served at the facility. The SLP reported the consistencies of the diets vary in what is served, but the diet levels she was told to use were: Puree, Minced and Moist, Soft and Bite-sized and Regular.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 47.Findings included: a) The facility's policy for Labeling and Dating stated, A. All food items prepared, opened, or stored in the facility kitchen must be clearly labeled and dated., B.c.1.a) Label with the date the item is placed in storage and the date of discard - add 6 to today's date. and C.a. The Culinary Manager or designee will perform frequent checks of all food storage areas for proper labeling and dating. The Administrator reported items should be dated for seven (7) days. Dietary Aide #94 reported, [NAME] wants everything for three (3) days. b) On 02/16/2026 at 10:15 AM, the Kitchen Investigation was initiated with the Administrator. The following items were found and confirmed by the Administrator: Spaghetti…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to the resident's personal products and unsanitary practices. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: 8, 34, 36, and 38 Facility Census: 47. a) On 02/17/26 at 1:48PM, during a facility walk through it was observed that resident #'s 8, 34, 36, and 38's wheel chairs or Geri chairs had holes, rips and tears with exposed inner padding On 02/18/26 at 2:08 PM, during a facility walk through and interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #79, she acknowledged the wheel chairs and Geri chairs in the resident rooms and the chairs in the activities room with holes, rips and tears exposing the inner padding. She agreed this was an infection control issue.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and interview with Resident [NAME], the facility failed to ensure survey results were readily accessible in an area where individuals wishing to examine them did not have to ask to see them. Facility Census: 47 Findings included: During Resident Council on 02/17/26 at 11:00 AM, it was revealed the survey book in the lobby was empty with a sign informing the reader to ask the front desk to see the book. An interview with Social Worker #47 on 02/17/26 at approximately 5:00 PM, revealed the book was kept behind the front desk to keep resident's from tearing the pages. The SW said at no time was the book accessible to anyone without them having to ask. There was a sign stating this, but it is important to note that the desk is unmanned at the end of a specific shift, daily. On 02/18/726 5:20 PM the surveyor observed an empty binder and in the lobby with a note stating survey results were available upon request.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents. This failed practice was observed to have affected a shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and #215. Facility census: 47On 02/16/26 at 1:25PM, during a facility walk through it was observed that resident shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and #215loose dark rusty pipes dirty buildup in the corners and around the base of the toiletcracked and loose drywall falling from the wall Dusty build up of hair and debris observed between the bathroom door and the [NAME] 02/18/26 at 12:40 PM, during a facility walk through and interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #79, she acknowledged the needed repairs in the resident rooms and hallways. she stated she would take note of it and make sure the issued would be added to the maintenance list.During a facility walk through and interview with the maintenance supervisor, on 02/17/26 at 1:15PM, he acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide quality care by not following or updating physicians orders as needed. This was discovered during the normal Long Term Survey Process and has the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #4 and #5. Census 47.Findings included: a) Resident #5 On 02/16/26 at 3:00 PM, review of resident's physician orders reviewed an order for Geri call cord in room due to Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) with inability to use standard call bell system. Start date of 11/25/25 On 02/16/26 at 4:00 PM, I observed resident's call light in room to be a regular, thumb press button call system. On 02/16/26 at approximately 4:20 PM, Restorative Nurse Assistant #34 was walking by resident's room and was asked if Resident #5 is ordered to have a specific type of call button. She looked in his room and then walked to the room next door and replied, He changed rooms with the resident next door and they didn't move his call light. When asked how long ago the rooms were changed, she could not recall and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #8. Facility Census:47Findings included: a) During a facility tour on 02/17/26 at 2:40 PM, the following environmental accident hazards were observed: Solarium: A steady leak in the ceiling with a continuous drip was blocked off with a retractable post/belt barrier, The barrier did not encompass the entire restricted area leaving a 2(two) to 3(three) foot gap that anyone could freely walk through to the wet floor. Further observation found missing electrical conduit with jagged edges and exposed electrical wiring around the wall. 100 and 200 Hallways: -Plastic molded lower rub rails in both resident halls had separated with 1/4 inch to 1/2-inch finger sized gaps -Lower encased wall lighting boxes below handrails opened with glass bulb and electric wires exposed Shower Room: A half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure the physician acknowledged Montly Medication Review's for residents. Resident identifiers: #2, #4, #31, and #36. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #2 Physician Recommendation Forms were not reviewed by the physician for psychoactive medications for the following dates: 11/15/25, 12/17/25, 01/15/26 and 02/16/26. On 02/19/26 at 1:00 PM, the Regional Clinical Operations Manager of Acquisitions and the Administrator confirmed there were no medication forms reviewed and signed by the physician secondary to the physician refusing to sign and the previous Director of Nursing receiving the recommendations and not getting them signed by the physician. b) Resident #31 Physician Recommendation Forms were not reviewed by the physician for psychoactive medications for the following date: 12/17/25. On 02/19/26 at 1:00 PM, the Regional Clinical Operations Manager of Acquisitions and the Administrator confirmed there were no medication forms reviewed and signed by the physician secondary to the physician refusing to sign and the previous Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were receiving therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #1 and #8. Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) Different diet levels per staff interview:1. The facility's policy and procedure for Meal Supervision and Assistance stated, 5. Check the tray before serving it to the resident to be sure that it is the correct diet ordered and that the food consistency is appropriate to the resident's ability to chew and swallow.2. On 02/16/2026, Dietary Aide #94, when asked what diet levels are served at the facility, the dietary aide reported they have puree, ground, minced and moist, and bite-sized -and stated, I just call them all ground.3. On 02/16/2026 at 2:09 PM, the State Surveyor Interviewed the Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) for diet consistencies served at the facility. The SLP reported the consistencies of the diets vary in what is served, but the diet levels she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure care was promoted in a manner that maintained or enhanced the resident's dignity and respect during the dining experience. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #18 and #24. Facility Census: 47.Findings included:a) Resident #18On 02/16/2026, Resident #18 was served by the staff,. The resident requested silverware from the State Surveyor as he was attempting to use his table mates dirty soiled napkin. The resident was served a piece of whole chicken breast and a salad. Nurse Aide #60 confirmed the resident did not receive silverware and got a black plastic spoon for the resident to use. Resident #24 was observed eating his lunch meal with plastic silverware.The resident's desserts were served in plastic bags and not on a regular dessert plate. On 02/16/2026 at 12:33 PM, the Administrator confirmed the desserts were served in a plastic bag.On 02/16/2026, during the initial dining room investigation, the State Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to monitor, evaluate and document restraints for residents. This was discovered during the Long Term Survey Process and had the ability to effect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #6. Facility census: 47. Findings Include: a) Resident #6 On 02/16/2026 at approximatley 4:00 PM a record review was done on Resident #6. The record review revealed it stated that Resident #6 had a diagnosis of Huntington's Disease. This disease can limit a person's functional status and control of limbs. For Resident #6 safety they had orders to have a wheel chair restraint belt on while in a wheel chair at all times. Resident #6 also had orders for limb restraint for Inter-Muscular (IM) Injections, due to the disease process making it hard to stay still during these procedures. The orders from the medical record were as follows: Broda Chair with quick release pelvic restraints while out of bed to maintain optimal upright position. Monitor Q 30 minutes and release Q 2 hours x 15 minutes for ROM, toileting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and documentation review the Facility failed to complete [NAME] Virginia Pre-admission Screening with new diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. This is true for Resident #3. Facility Census 47. Findings Included:a) Resident #3 On 02/16/26, a review wascompleted of a document titled [NAME] Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Pre-admission Screening (PAS) dated for 11/13/24. For Resident #3, on Question #30 the answer was marked a. None. Upon Review of Resident #3's diagnosis list, resident was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Moderate on 11/15/24. Interview with Administrator on 02/17/26 at 5:25 PM who acknowledged Resident #3 did not have a new PAS did not contain his new diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a well -balanced diet taking into consideration preferences. The failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #30. Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #30 Resident #30's diet order stated, Consistent Carbohydrate, Regular, Thin, and no added salt, no beef or pork ,yogurt at Breakfast and Lunch.: On 02/17/2026 at 12:31 PM, [NAME] #98 served the resident ham on her tray. Following state surveyor intervention, Dietary Aide #97 removed Resident #30's tray from delivery cart and confirmed the tray card stated food allergy for milk and no beef or pork. [NAME] #98 stated, I ain't got anything .only pork. and It depends on her mood. - referring to if the resident eats pork or not. The resident received a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. The facility does not provide an alternate menu, but resident's can choose something from the always available menu according to Account Manager #91.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facilitate failed to ensure the resident received food that accommodated allergies, intolerances and preferences. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #30. Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #30's diet order stated, Consistent Carbohydrate, Regular, Thin, and no added salt, no beef or pork ,yogurt at Breakfast and Lunch. On 02/17/26 at 12:31 PM, [NAME] #98 served the resident ham on her tray. Following state surveyor intervention, Dietary Aide #97 removed Resident #30's tray from delivery cart and confirmed the tray card stated food allergy for milk and no beef or pork. [NAME] #98 stated, I ain't got anything .only pork. and It depends on her mood. - referring to if the resident eats pork or not. The resident received a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. The facility does not provide an alternate menu, but resident's can choose something from the always available menu according to Account Manager #91. On 02/16/2026 at 12:50,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow prescribed dietary order for liquid consistency for the residents. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 47. Findings Include: a) Resident #4 On 02/16/26 at approximately 12:00 PM a meal tray was delivered to Resident #4 room. It was placed down and when opened the tray was observed to contain the following:Tray contained Full chicken breast (not cut up and not diet appropriate)Polenta Summer squash was missing and was subbed w/ spinach (not diet appropriate)Roll (not diet appropriate)Malt vinegar - missingMargarine - missingChocolate pudding was missing and subbed out w/ brownie CoffeeSoy milk The Residents diet was Minced and moist with nectar thick liquids. This was a requirement per Speech therapy #77, who confirmed Resident #4 was a high aspiration risk and pocketed their food. This tray was delivered by LPN #21 and when called back into the room to confirm the contents did not meet the prescribed dietary requirements, she stated that The chicken should not have been a whole piece, should be shredded.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the Facility failed to provide a resident with an assistive device during meals by not providing nosey cup. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifierz: #6. Facility Census: 47. Findings Included:a) Resident #6 On 02/17/26 at approximately 12:50 PM, Resident #6 was observed dining in the dining room with assistance from Nurse Aide #74. Observation of Resident #6's tray card revealed he was to have one nosey cup, not present on his tray. He did have cold tea, orange juice and and milk all served in regular clear plastic cups. An interview with Nurse Aide #74 was conducted 02/17/26 at 12:55 PM revealed they were not familiar with a nosey cup and these were the cups that resident normally used at meals. Review of Care Plan for Resident #6 stated the following: Focus: Resident presented with potential for nutritional risk related to diagnosis major depressive disorder, vitamin D deficiency. Receiving a mechanically altered diet with thickened liquids to ease chewing/swallowing concerns secondary to dx of Huntington's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the Facility failed to provide accurate documentation by listing inaccurate diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder for a resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #1. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #1 On 02/16/26 during documentation review, it was observed that Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) onset of 09/7/23 on his diagnosis list. Upon further review of his records, this diagnosis nor treatment for said diagnosis could be found. An interview with Social Services Director (SSD) on 02/17/26 at 4:11 PM revealed the diagnosis had been taken off the Matrix and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment per suggestion of their corporate MDS coordinator due to lack of proof resident had this diagnosis. SSD reported Resident #1's intake information nor in-house diagnostic information suggested Resident #1 had a diagnosis of PTSD. An interview with Administrator on 02/18/26 at approximately 2:00 PM, he relayed per the facility's Corporate MDS Coordinator, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide food at a palatable and appetizing temperature as determined by the type of food to ensure resident satisfaction. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 51. Findingd included: a) A tray on A-Hall was tested by DM #100 and temperatures were as follows: Pureed Pork - 122 degrees Mashed Potatoes - 126 degrees Pureed Peas - 102 degrees Pureed Bread - 100 degrees b) Temperatures were confirmed by DM #100. DM #100 reported pork should have been at 130 degrees and the vegetable's temperature was low. DM #100 stated the bread could be served hot or cold. The facility's Policy and Procedure stated, Hot foods will be served at a temperature 120 degrees F or higher. These findings confirmed by Dietary Manager (DM) #100 on 11/19/24 at 12:25 PM.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store and label food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 51. Findings included: Findings confirmed by the Dietary Manager (DM) #100 and the Chief Operating Officer (COO) #35 on 11/18/24 during the investigation initiated at 11:42 AM included the following items in the pantry: a) An opened can of Shasta. b) Undated sandwiches in fold over bags. c) Unlabeled and undated drink in a cup -tea. d) Undated bowl of broth. e) Opened and used container of Boost in the freezer. f) Undated hamburger in the freezer. g) Undated package of lasagna in freezer. DM #100 asked, Is that me? and stated, I'm going to throw it away. COO #35 stated the refrigerators were the dietary department's responsibility. According to the 2013 US Publilc Health Service Food and Durg Administration Food Code: 3-202.15 Package Integrity: Food packages shall be in good condition and protect the integrity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving resident-to-resident sexual abuse was reported within two (2) hours of the event/allegation being brought to the facility's attention, to appropriate state agencies as required. This was a random opportunity for discovery throughout the facility reportable incident (FRI) investigative process. Resident identifier: #48. Facility census: 51. Findings included: a) Resident #48 During a record review, on 11/19/24 at 7:30 PM, it was noted there was a written reporting form outlining a resident-to-resident sexual altercation between Resident #48 and Resident #8. There was no evidence that the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) had been notified of this incident within the required two (2) hour time frame. On 11/20/24 at 8:30 AM, a review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy revealed that an allegation must be reported within (2) hours if it involved abuse During an interview on 11/20/24 at approximately 9:00 AM, the Chief Operating Officer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This was true for two (2) of five (5) days identified during the long-term care survey process. This had the ability to affect all the residents. Facility census: 49. Findings included: a) 05/28/23 On 05/29/24 at approximately 11:00 AM during a review of the facilities payroll transaction report of all direct care hours for 05/28/23, no direct care Registered Nurse (RN) hours were identified for 05/28/23. On 05/29/24 at approximately 11:05 AM during a further review of the facility Nursing Staff Information Sheet (also known as the Nursing Staffing Posting form), the total number of Registered Nurse staff for 05/28/23 was handwritten in at one (1) and the total number of hours for the Registered Nurse Staff hours was also handwritten in at eight (8). During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/29/24 at approximately 12:15 PM, he stated he had found an agency Timesheet for Agency RN #95 and that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to conduct and document a complete facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility did not assess the physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plant considerations that are necessary to care for the resident population. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the long-term care survey. Census: 49. Findings included: a) Gas leak On 05/29/24 at approximately 11:30 AM during a review of the facility assessment revealed on Page 14 under number 3.12 to provide your facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach (an integrated approach focusing on capacities and capabilities critical to preparedness for a full spectrum of emergencies and natural disasters). It was further identified on Page 24 of the facility assessment that the following were the identified facility risks and or community risks/disasters listed that have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and or representative was informed in advance by the physician, other practitioner or health professional of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative option preferred. This was true for 1 (one) of 18 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #36. Facility census: 49. Findings include: a) Resident #36 On 05/28/24 at 12:30 AM, a review of Resident #36's medical record was conducted. A fall care plan was noted with interventions stating, Encourage resident to wear hipsters at all times for safety. and Encourage resident to wear soft helmet while ambulating for safety. On 05/28/24 at 01:07 PM an observation of Resident #36 was conducted. Resident #36 was noted to be in bed, no hipsters were noted to be on Resident #36 and no helmet was noted to be present. On 5/29/24 at 11:25 AM an interview with Employee #72 was conducted. Employee #72 stated, He refuses to wear the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident council meeting interviews, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were able to submit grievances anonymously. This had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 49. Findings included: a) 05/28/24 12:30 PM, Observed a sign in the front lobby stating there were grievance forms available at the front desk. 05/29/24 10:45 AM, During resident council meeting, Resident #24 stated in order to file a grievance residents and family must ask for a form at the front desk. She stated that staff will assist residents in filing out the paper. Resident #24 stated there was no place to get the forms anonymously or to submit them anonymously. 05/29/24 11:12 AM during an interview with Social Worker (SW) #9 the SW explained that the process of completing a grievance was to ask a staff member for a form and that she or other staff would assist in completing the form if asked. She stated there was no place to get a form anonymously and/or submit it anonymously.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team composed of individuals who have knowledge of the resident and his/her needs.This was true for 3 (three) of 18 residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: Resident #36, Resident #25 and Resident #45. Facility census: 49. Findings Include: Resident #36 On 05/28/24 at 12:30 AM, a review of Resident #36 ' s medical record was conducted. A fall care plan was noted with interventions stating, Encourage resident to wear hipsters at all times for safety. and Encourage resident to wear soft helmet while ambulating for safety. On 05/28/24 at 01:07 PM an observation of Resident #36 was conducted. Resident #36 was noted to be in bed, no hipsters were noted to be on Resident #36 and no helmet was noted to be present. A further review of Resident #36 ' s medical record was conducted on 05/28/24 at approximately 01:25 PM, which noted Resident #36 had 19 documented falls from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice which would allow the residents to achieve their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was true for two (2) out of four (4) residents reviewed for restorative nursing services. Resident identifiers: #5 and #37. Facility census: 49. Findings included: a) Resident #5 Record review on 05/30/24 at 11:51 AM, revealed that Resident #5's physician had prescribed Range of Motion (ROM)/stretching protocol global 1 (one) time daily, up to 5 (five) times a week for contracture management on 12/15/21. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 10:46 AM, Physical Therapist (PT) #15 and PT # 22 , and also confirmed by record review, revealed the resident received twelve (12) treatments out of a prescribed twenty-five (25) treatments, during the period 04/01/24 to 04/31/24. b) Resident #37 Record review for Resident #37 revealed that his physician had prescribed Moist Heat to L LE (Left Lower Extremity) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and resident observation the facility failed to provide supervision, implementation, monitoring and modifying of interventions to prevent avoidable accidents. This was true for 2 (two) of 7 (seven) residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: Resident #36 and Resident #25. Facility census: 49. Findings include: a) Resident #36 On 05/28/24 at 12:30 PM, a review of Resident #36 ' s medical record was conducted. A fall care plan was noted with interventions stating, Encourage resident to wear hipsters at all times for safety. Encourage resident to wear soft helmet while ambulating for safety. On 05/28/24 at 1:07 PM an observation of Resident #36 was conducted. Resident #36 was noted to be in bed, no hipsters were noted to be on Resident #36 and no helmet was noted to be present. A further review of Resident #36's medical record was conducted on 05/28/24 at approximately 1:25 PM, which noted Resident #36 had 19 documented falls from 01/01/24 through 05/26/24. The falls occurred on: 01/15/24, 01/22/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the accurate data on the nurse staffing information form. The daily census was not accurate for 4 of 5 daily of the nurse staffing information forms reviewed during the long-term care process. This issue had the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Census: 49. Findings included: The facilities available and occupied beds report review on 05/29/24 at 11:00 AM revealed the following: a) 05/28/23 On 05/28/23 the daily census was identified to be 46 and the staffing posting form was a handwritten census of 49. b) 07/05/23 On 07/05/23 the daily census was identified to be 47 and the staffing posting form was a handwritten census of 48. c) 01/01/24 On 01/01/24 the daily census was identified to be 43 and the staffing posting form was a handwritten census of 44. d) 05/27/24 On 05/27/24 the daily census was identified to be 49 and the staffing posting form was a handwritten census of 50. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/29/24 at approximately 12:20 PM, he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring and medication side effect monitoring was documented for a resident receiving psychotropic meds. This deficient practice affected one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 49. Resident identifier: a) Resident #12 Review of the facility's policy titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Monitoring with no implementation date specified, stated the following: - If a resident was being treated for altered behavior and mood, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) would document any improvements or worsening in the resident's behavior, mood, and function. - The IDT would monitor for side-effects related to psychoactive medications. Review of Resident #12's medical records showed the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12 had diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and mood disorder. The resident was prescribed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide hand washing to residents on B hall before their lunch meal. Resident #33 had a pool noodle type piped foam taped around the head and foot board of the bed. This foam could not be effectively cleaned. These practices were random opportunities for discovery during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census: 49. Findings included: a) B-hall An observation on 05/29/24 at 12:35 PM, revealed (7) seven lunch trays were passed on B hall with no hand hygiene provided. During an interview on 05/29/24 at 12:35 PM, with Nurse Aide (NA) #29 she stated, I'll be honest, we normally don't do it on the hallway. We do in the dining room but not on the hallway During an interview on 05/29/24 at 1:30 PM, with The Director of Nursing (DON) he confirmed that handwashing should be completed with residents before they receive their tray. b) Resident #33 05/29/24 at 1:38 PM during a tour of resident room the black pipe foam that resembled a pool noodle was seen to be tapped with black tape along the headboard and the foot board…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and observation the facility failed to provide a dignified dining service. This failed practice was found true for (1) one random resident observed during the lunch dining in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #44. Facility Census 49. Findings Include: a) Resident #44 During an observation on 05/29/24 at 12:15 PM, Resident #44 was sitting at a table with (3) three other residents. The other (3) three residents got their lunch tray at 12:15PM. (9) nine other residents at different tables were served before Resident #44 received her lunch tray at 12:25 PM. Further observation showed that (1) one of the residents seated at the table with Resident #44 was finished eating when Resident # 44 got her lunch tray. During an interview, on 05/29/24 at 12:25 PM, with Nurse aide (NA) #87 she stated, We are supposed to pass them out in order, but they don't come out in order. We must find them. We have not come to [Resident # 44 name} tray yet.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation in regard to activities of daily living (ADLs). This was true for one (1) of eighteen (18) residents reviewed under the ADL pathway. Resident identifier: #43. Facility Census: 49 Findings included: a) Gas Leak Resulting in No Hot Water Facility staff had reported signs of a gas leak on 05/26/24. The gas company technician had noted a positive test for gas in the kitchen area, and, as a precaution, recommended turning off the gas supply to the facility. As a result, no hot water had been available for the residents since 05/26/24. a) Resident #43 During staff interviews on 05/30/24 at 11:03 AM, with Nurse Aide (NA) #29, Registered Nurse (RN) #83 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #73, stated the bath wipes used for bed baths were to be warmed for 20 seconds in a microwave before being used on residents. However, staff were unable to warm the bath wipes because the microwave ovens had been removed due to safety concerns. This resulted in residents being wiped down with cold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by not allowing Resident # 29 access to his personal belongings by his own freewill. Resident #33's room had personal health information taped on the bed and had cosmetic imperfections that could pose a safety hazzard in the bathroom. This failed practice was found true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for environment during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #29, #33. Facility Census: 49. Findings Include: a) Resident # 29 During the initial interview on 05/28/24 at 1:46 PM, Resident # 29 stated, I want stuff out of my closet, and I can't get to it because there is a lock on it. When surveyor asked if he had a key to it Resident #29 stated, No, the nurse or NA has it and I have to have them come and unlock. It takes them a long time. A record review on 05/28/24 at 2:00 PM revealed that Resident # 29 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. During an interview, on 05/28/24 at 3:30 PM, the Administrator stated, I'm sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, in response to allegations of abuse, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. This was true for 1 (one) of 7 (seven) residents reviewed in the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: Resident #25. Facility census: 49. Findings include: Resident #25 On 05/29/24 at 09:00 PM, a review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 05/16/24, was conducted. It was reported on 05/16/24 that on 05/15/24 at 10:00 PM, while facility staff was providing care to Resident #25, a 10cm x 5cm bruise, right upper thigh was noted and that it was estimated to be approximately 2-3 days old. A review of the facility ' s investigation noted that statements were obtained from 12 from staff members. However upon reviewing the statements obtained it was noted that 7 (seven) of the 12 statements were from employees not working on the unit at the time of the occurrence. At that time this Surveyor requested a copy of the schedule from the date and time of the occurrence. It was then noted that statements…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and failed to complete a new PASRR when a PASRR expired. This deficient practice had the potential to affect two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of PASRR. Resident identifiers: #27 and #41. Facility census: 49. Findings included: a) Resident #27 Review of Resident 27's medical records showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The resident had a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition at the time of admission to the facility. Resident #27 had been transferred from another long-term care facility who documented that the resident had a diagnosis of psychosis. Further review of Resident #27's medical records showed a PASSR completed [DATE]. The PASSR did not indicate the resident had a diagnosis of psychotic disorder. On [DATE] at 2:00 PM, Social Worker #65 confirmed Resident #27's admission PASSR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation, the facility failed to provide accurate and complete medical records in regard to activities of daily living (ADLs). This was true for one (1) of eighteen (18) residents reviewed under the ADL pathway. Resident identifier: #43. Facility Census: 49 Findings included: a) Gas Leak Resulting in No Hot Water Facility staff had reported signs of a gas leak on 05/26/24. The gas company technician had noted a positive test for gas in the kitchen area, and, as a precaution, recommended turning off the gas supply to the facility. As a result, no hot water had been available for the residents since 05/26/24. a) Resident #43 During a review of Bath/Shower Temperature Logs at the nursing station on 05/30/24 at 11:17 AM, RN #83 and LPN #73 showed a shower being completed for Resident #43 on the evening of 05/26/24. Submission of a request for Bath/Shower Temperature Logs completed on 05/30/24 at 11:17 AM. These logs revealed no completed sheets. Upon interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) - on 05/30/24 at 12:47 PM, DON stated there were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reportable allegation review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure they implemented their abuse/neglect policy as it relates to thoroughly investigating allegations of abuse. Resident identifier: #34, #28. Facility census: 48. Findings included: a) Resident #34 The facility received allegations through a social media account that alleged that on night shift on hallway B1 the nurse aides were telling an obese patient that she needs to come to the desk to get water because she's too fat. The facility investigated an allegation of abuse/neglect involving Resident #34 on 01/08/24. During this investigation Social Worker #22 and Social Worker #40 both interviewed Resident #34. They both asked the resident how she got access to water for drinking. When Social Worker #40 asked this question the resident responded, They don't bring me water in my bedroom. They tell me that I need to go to the bathroom and then get my water. When Social Worker #22 asked the question the resident said, I ask for it and they bring it. The social workers did not interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reportable allegation review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure they thoroughly investigated allegations of abuse. Resident identifier: #34, #28. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility census: 48. Findings included: a) Resident #34 The facility received allegations through a social media account that alleged that on night shift on hallway B1 the nurse aides were telling an obese patient that she needs to come to the desk to get water because she's too fat. The facility investigated an allegation of abuse/neglect involving Resident #34 on 01/08/24. During this investigation Social Worker #22 and Social Worker #40 both interviewed Resident #34. They both asked the resident how she got access to water for drinking. When Social Worker #40 asked this question the resident responded, They don't bring me water in my bedroom. They tell me that I need to go to the bathroom and then get my water. When Social Worker #22 asked the question the resident said, I ask for it and they bring it. The social workers did not interview staff only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) residents were free from significant medication errors. Resident #54 received two (2) medications that were intended for his roommate. Resident #54 received a sulfonylureas (Glipizide) and an anticonvulsant (Dilantin). The resident did not have diagnoses that supported the need for these two (2) classes of medications. Resident identifier: #54. Facility census: 48. Findings included: a) Resident #54 A medication error report dated 12/27/23 regarding Resident #54 revealed the facility administered Glipizide 10 mg (milligram) po (by mouth) and Diazepam 5 mg po. These medications were both administered on 12/19/24 at 10:00 PM. The medication error report revealed the medication belonged to Resident #54's roommate. Registered Nurse (RN) #29 administered the medication. The report revealed the physician was contacted and the resident was to be monitored, a snack given and glucose monitored every 3-4 hours. Further medical record review revealed this did not happen. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medication error report review, policy review, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure their quality assurance committee analyses a significant medication errors to determine a root cause analysis and prevent the possible recurrence. Resident #54 received two (2) medications that were intended for his roommate. Resident #54 was one (1) of three (3) residents who were reviewed for significant medication errors. Resident #54 received a sulfonylureas (Glipizide) and an anticonvulsant (Dilantin). Resident identifier: #54. Facility census: 48. Findings included: a) Resident #54 On 03/27/24 at approximately 9:10 a.m., interview with Registered Nurse (RN)/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) #47 she was asked to describe how medication administration errors are reported to the QAPI committee. RN/QAPI #47 replied I get the med error numbers and report them out in the meeting. RN/QAPI #47 was asked if a root cause analysis of medication administration errors are performed with each error. RN/QAPI #47 replied, No, I do not do one each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional. This had a potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 44. Findings Included: a) Qualified Activity Professional During an observation on 08/22/22 at 12:05 PM the Activity Department was void of a certificate for a qualified activity professional. During an interview on 08/23/22 at 9:10 AM, the Social Worker #82 stated, We don't have an activity director we have not had one in months, I have told them we needed one, I am doing the best I can but I am not certified and really don't know what I am doing. During an interview on 08/23/22 at 10:39 AM, the Administrator stated, The Activity Director has been gone since August 2021. The Division of Personnel will not let us hire due to not knowing if its a Supervisor 2 or 1 position. I have been telling them we were going to get a tag for not having an Activity Director. .
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on employee record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the annual performance evaluations for nurse aides. This was true for five (5) of five (5) agency nurse aides reviewed during the sufficient and competent nurse staffing. Employee #23, #32, #46, #57, and #61 had not received their annual nurse aide performance reviews. Facility census: 44 Findings included: a) Performance reviews for agency nurse aides During a review of employee records on 08/24/22, it was discovered Employee #23, #32, #46, #57, and #61 agency nurse aides (NA) had not had their annual performance reviews completed on or before their annual date of hire. In an interview with the interim Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/23/22 at 1:00 PM, reported he had never completed annual performance reviews for any agency NA staff. .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store food in sanitary conditions by not labeling foods appropriately and not discarding when foods expired in the kitchen. The facility also failed to correctly document temperatures for all the dietary equipment requiring temperature logs. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents that receive nutrients from the kitchen. Facility Census:44 Findings Included: A facility policy titled Food Storage Labeling with a revision date of 04/2018 stated (Typed as written) .Procedures 4. An accurate thermometer will be kept in each refrigerator and freezer. A written record or daily temperatures will be recorded. 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. a) Reach In Freezer An initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Worker (FSW)#209 beginning on 08/22/22 at 11:17 AM, the reach in freezer found the following items : -An opened box of Hamburger Patties: no opened date -An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of psychiatric/mood disorders for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #23. Facility census: 44. Findings included: a) Resident #23 Review of Resident #23's medical records showed a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. The resident was taking the medication iloperidone for schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 06/23/22 showed the resident was not coded as having schizophrenia, which included schizoaffective disorder. During an interview on 08/24/22 at 11:01 AM, the Minimum Data Set Coordinator confirmed Resident #23 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and the MDS with ARD 06/23/22 was incorrect. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #4's pressure ulcer treatment to the coccyx was not on the treatment administration record. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 44. Findings included: a) Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's physician's orders showed the following orders written on 06/01/22 for pressure ulcer care: --Cleanse left hip with mild soap and water, pat dry. Apply daikon's to the fluffed tip of 2x2 gauze and gently insert into the tunneled area on side of the wound going approximately 1 cm, pack gently and loosely, do not force 2x2 gauze into area, cover with 2x2 gauze into area, cover with 2x2 gauze and paper tape. Change daily and PRN (as needed). --Cleanse coccyx with mild soap and water, pat dry. Apply fluffed dry 2x2 gauze in the coccyx area, tape not needed. Change every day and PRN. On 08/24/22 at 9:13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure temperature checks were completed daily for one (1) of the two (2) refrigerators used for medication storage. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census:44. Findings included: a) Medication Temperatures During an observation of the A1 medication storage room (located on A Hall) on 08/23/22 at 9:15 AM, the temperature log for the medication refrigerator was found to incomplete for August 2022. The following dates were blank on the temperature log: 08/04/22, 08/09/22, 08/13/22, 08/17/22, and 08/18/22. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #80 verified the temperature log was incomplete and stated that night shift usually completes the temperature log and stated, We've hired so many new people on nights they probably forgot. LPN #80 further stated that the medications routinely kept in the refrigerator were vaccines, insulin, suppositories, eye drops in addition to a vial Ativan for intramuscular injections at that moment. Record review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$57,116 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $57,116 — penalty dated 2024-01-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in WV
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 51E148. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.