Trinity Health Care Of Mingo

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.00 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on review record, staff interviews, reportable's (immediate and five (5) day), and staff education, time line of the incident and plan of correction, the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from neglect. Resident #42 sustained a fractured hip and a subdural hematoma from an unwitnessed event. The resident was sent to a local hospital where the subdural hematoma had ceased and the hip was repaired. This caused physical harm to the resident and will be cited a G at F600. Resident identifier: #42 Facility census: 81. Findings included: a) Resident #42 Resident #42 was originally admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, history of falling, left artificial hip joint, hypertension, heart failure, adult failure to thrive, and Dementia severe with agitation. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 01/16/24 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 3. The BIMS score of three (3) indicates severe cognitive impairment. A review of the 5-day PPS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan in the area for dental services for resident #5 and activity preferences for Resident's #8 and #50 were developed. This was found true for three (3) of 25 residents' care plans reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers #8, #50, and #5 Facility Census: 82 a) Resident #8 During record review on 08/27/25 at approximately 2:00 PM of Resident #8's section F of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident enjoys Music, Pets, Religious activities and doing things with groups of people. Further record review of resident #8's personalized care plan interventions revealed the following interventions; Staff will assist her to/from group activities as needed Staff will give her verbal praise for her attendance in any group activity Staff will invite/encourage her to attend group activities of her choice. Staff will post a monthly activity calendar in her room for her review. Music, Pets, religious activities, which were activities she enjoys doin were not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate Minimum Data (MDS) assessment in the area of hospice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of hospice. Resident Identifiers: #62. Facility Census: 82.Findings included:a) Resident #62 Review of Resident #62's physician's orders showed an order written on 03/14/25 for Hospice Care, Do Not Resuscitate, Comfort Treatments. Review of Resident #62's comprehensive care plan confirmed the resident was receiving hospice services. Resident #62's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 05/01/25 documented the resident was receiving hospice services. Resident #62's quarterly MDS with ARD 07/17/25 documented the resident was not receiving hospice services. On 08/26/25 at 3:33 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #62's MDS with ARD 07/17/25 was incorrect and should have indicated the resident was receiving hospice services. The DON stated she corrected the MDS.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive activities assessment was completed for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #8) reviewed for activities during the long-term care survey. Facility census: 82. Resident identifier: #8 Findings Include:a) Resident #8The facility's policy titled Timeframe for Completion of Activities Assessment on New Admissions states: An initial activities interest screening shall be completed by Activities staff or designee within 72 hours of admission to identify immediate preferences and needs. A full Activities Assessment, consistent with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and facility policy, shall be completed within 14 calendar days of admission. The Activities Assessment will be used to develop an individualized Activity Care Plan. completed and entered in the resident's comprehensive care plan within 7 days after completion of the MDS assessment reference date, per CMS guidelines.On 08/27/25 at 12:30 PM, record review revealed that Resident #8 had an Activity evaluation opened on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were stored and used safely, creating a potential chemical exposure hazard for residents residing in the long-term care facility, this was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 82. Findings include:a) On 08/25/25 at 11:25 AM, the NA (Nurse Aide) cart was observed to contain a container of Sumer Sani-Cloth Germicidal Wipes.During an interview on 08/25/25 at 11:30 AM, the Infection Preventionist (IP Nurse #81) stated, These aint suppose to be on the NA cart, we use these to wipe equipment down after use like, the lifts, glucose machines, vitals machines, I'll educate staff now, and removed the wipes from the cart. confirming they should not be accessable to residents expecially residents who does not have capacity.Recoird Review completed on 08/25/25 at 12:12 PM of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) revealed the following hazards:Causes serious eye irritationMay cause drowsiness or dizzinessFlammable liquid and vaporMay be harmful if swallowed or inhaled

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice. For one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of respiratory care, the supplemental oxygen flow rate was not set to the rate ordered by the physician. Resident Identifier: #74. Facility Census: 82.Findings included: a) Resident #74 Review of Resident #74's physician's orders showed an order written on 08/01/25 for oxygen at 3 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula per concentrator as needed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). An observation on 08/25/25 at 1:05 PM showed the resident was in bed with oxygen 1.5 LPM infusing via nasal cannula. An observation on 08/26/25 at 9:35 AM showed the resident was in bed with oxygen 2 LPM infusing via nasal cannula. An observation on 08/27/25 at 10:35 AM showed the resident was in bed with oxygen 2 LPM infusing via nasal cannula. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON increased the resident's oxygen to 3 LPM in accordance with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain dental services to meet the resident's needs. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the dental care area. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 82.Findings included:a) Resident #5 During an interview on 08/25/25 at 1:58 PM, Resident #5 stated she needed to have a tooth pulled, but she wasn't sure if the extraction had been scheduled. She had an obviously carious front tooth. The resident stated she was beginning to have twinges of pain in the front tooth. Review of Resident #5's medical records showed a consultation report from a dentist dated 12/06/24. The dentist recommended extraction of her remaining maxillary (upper jaw) teeth. A referral was to be made to an oral surgery clinic. The resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) contained the following note in the Care Area Assessment (CAA) process: Resident has natural teeth; she has some missing teeth and potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide physician-ordered adaptive eating devices for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident identifier: #48. Facility census: 82. Findings included: a) Resident #48 Review of Resident #48's physician's orders showed the following orders: NAS (no added salt) and LCS (low concentrated sugar) diet, pureed texture, honey thick consistency Cup with lid d/t [due to] aspiration precaution. No straws d/t (due to) aspiration precautions. All these orders were written on 07/11/25. On 08/27/25 at 11:18 AM, Nurse Aide (NA) #14 was observed setting up Resident #48's lunch tray on his overbed table while the resident was in bed. The resident had a carton of honey thickened beverage with a straw in it. Resident #48's tray ticket stated, No straws. NA #14 confirmed Resident #48 was to have no straws according to his tray ticket. NA #14 removed the straw from the beverage carton and obtained a lidded cup from the kitchen for the resident's beverage. On 08/27/25, the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-04 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a new pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) when four (4) of five (5) reviewed for the care area of PASARR received a new diagnosis of a serious mental disorder. Resident identifiers: 66, 10, 62, 24. Facility Census: 77. Findings included: a) Resident #66 On 01/02/24 at approximately 01:45 PM, record review indicates that Resident #66 was admitted to the facility with a PASARR indicating no diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #66 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, on 04/14/23 and the PASARR was not updated to reflect the diagnosis. On 01/03/24 at approximately 09:56 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) #23 presented copies of Resident #66's diagnoses, care plan, and PASARR. The DON #23 acknowledged the diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, the missing on the most recent PASARR, and acknowledged there was no updated PASARR to reflect the diagnosis. b) Resident #10 On 01/02/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) Resident reviewed for the care area of death received medications as ordered by the physician. Resident identifier: 80. Facility census: 77. Findings included: a) Resident #80 Record review found the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found an order for Lisinopril, oral tablet, 5 milligrams (mg's) give 1 tablet by mouth, one time a day, The start date of the Lisinopril was [DATE]. HOLD if systolic Blood pressure is less than 120 or if heart rate is less than 60 beats per minute (BPM) and Notify MD (doctor.) The medication was ordered to be given at 9:00 AM. The diagnosis for use of this medication was, Essential Hypertension. Review of the MAR found the following days when the medication was administered, but should have been held according to the physician's order because the systolic blood pressure was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 77. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 01/02/24 at 11:15 AM, it was discovered the drip pan had a large accumulation of grease build up. In the walk-in cooler a bin holding four (4) ounce orange juice cups had two (2) cups that had been crushed and the orange juice had poured out over the other juice cups and accumulated in the bottom of the bin. There was a used paper towel and a strip of cardboard lying on top of the orange juice cups. An interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 01/02/24 at 11:15 AM, verified the grease drip pan needed to be cleaned and the two (2) damaged orange juice cups had contaminated the other orange juice cups.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,237 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $11,912 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
• $13,325 — penalty dated 2024-02-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $87K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV