Stonehaven Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 60.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2023-02-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the Director of Nursing's (DON's) job description, and review of a facility policy titled, Competency Evaluation, Employee Identifier (EI) #2, the DON, failed to have a system in place to ensure nursing services personnel were competent and able to demonstrate timely and appropriate response, in accordance with facility policy, for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in the event of residents becoming unresponsive and requiring CPR. On [DATE] at approximately 9:59 PM, EI #4, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), found Resident Identifier (RI) #58 unresponsive and alerted the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), EI #3. Without knowing RI #58's code status, EI #3 said he began chest compressions and continued, without providing rescue breaths, until about 10:14 PM, when he stopped to go find out RI #58's code status and to make phone calls to the resident's representative and the DON. EI #3 failed to call out for assistance from other staff who were in the building, including EI #5,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-02-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run report, and the American Heart Association (AHA) Adult Basic Life Support (ABLS) Algorithm for Health Care Providers, the facility failed to ensure CPR response was provided in accordance with facility policy and in accordance with the AHA ABLS Algorithm for Health Care Providers for Resident Identifier (RI) #58 on [DATE], when Employee Identifier (EI) #4, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), found RI #58 unresponsive and alerted the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), EI #3, around 9:59 PM. EI #3, the LPN, without knowing RI #58's code status, said he began chest compressions and continued, without providing rescue breaths, until about 10:14 PM, when he stopped to go find out RI #58's code status and to make phone calls to the resident's representative and the Director of Nursing (DON). EI #3 failed to call out for assistance from other staff who were in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and review of the 2017 Food Code, the facility failed to ensure: 1. two ovens were not found with a heavy build-up of what appeared to be food crumbs in the bottoms and in the crevice between the oven floor and the oven door; 2. a heavy amount of a grease-like build-up was not observed on eight of ten stove top grates; and 3. pots were not stacked on a shelf with crumbs and dust. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. (United States) Public Health Service and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) included the following: . 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. . (C) Non FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris. 4-903.11 Equipment, Utensils, Linens, . and Single-Use Articles. (A) . cleaned EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS, . shall be stored: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where they are not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and review of a document provided by the facility titled NURSING HOME RESIDENTS' RIGHTS, the facility failed to ensure mini blinds in Room Locators (RLs) #3, RL #4, RL #5 and RL #6 were not torn during observations made on 02/07/2023, 02/08/2023, and 02/09/2023. This affected four of four RLs observed with torn blinds. Findings Include: A review of a facility document titled NURSING HOME RESIDENTS' RIGHTS, revealed: . Right to a Dignified Existence . A home-like environment . On 02/07/2023 at 6:15 PM the surveyor observed torn blinds in RL #3, RL #4,RL #5, and RL #6. On 02/08/2023 at 7:00 PM the surveyor observed torn mini blinds, with multiple broken slats, in RL #3, RL #4, RL #5, and RL #6. On 02/09/2023 at 8:15 AM an observation was made with Employee Identifier (EI) #10, the Maintenance Assistant. EI #10 was asked to observe RL #3 and was asked what concern he saw with the mini blinds. EI #10 said they were torn and needed to be replaced. An observation was made of RL #4 with EI #10 and he was asked what concern he saw with the mini blinds. EI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record reviews, review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument and review of a facility policy titled ICD-10 Coding Integrity, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], RI #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] and RI #8's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] were accurately coded to reflect RI #2's, RI #3's and RI #8's active diagnoses. This affected three of twenty-two sampled residents. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) Coding Integrity, with an implementation date of 01/01/2023, revealed: .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to report accurate diagnosis codes using ICD-10. Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, dated October 2019, revealed: . SECTION I: ACTIVE DIAGNOSES Intent: The items…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and review of a facility policy titled Handling Clean Linen, the facility failed to ensure laundry staff transported, distributed, handled, and carried clean resident clothing in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. On 02/07/2023 Employee Identifier (EI) #8, Laundry staff, was observed transporting uncovered clean clothing items and delivering them to residents. EI #8 carried items into five resident rooms, and was observed placing clean clothing under his arm while placing another resident's clothing in their closet. This had the potential to affect five of five residents whose clothing was delivered. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Handling Clean Linen with a date of 1/1/23 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to handle, store, process and transport clean linen in a safe and sanitary method to prevent contamination of the linen, which can lead to infection. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. can become contaminated with pathogens from contact with intact skin or body substances, or from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-10-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse transcribed Resident Identifier (RI) #71's treatment change order onto the Physician's Orders after receiving a treatment change order from the wound specialist. This affected RI #71, one of four residents sampled for pressure ulcers. Findings include: RI #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident had a diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. RI #71's WOUND EVALUATION & MANAGEMENT SUMMARY, dated 9/17/2019, documented the following: . DRESSING TREATMENT P LAN Primary Dressing(s) Alginate calcium w/ (with) silver apply three times per week for 30 days . On 9/18/19, Employee Identifier (EI) #2, Licensed Practical Nurse/Wound Care Nurse, documented the following in RI #71's Departmental Notes: . Treatment changed back to Silvercel (Alginate calcium w/ (with) silver) . 3 x (times) weekly . According to RI #71's Treatment Administration Records (TARs), RI #71's wound treatment was changed from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policies titled, Personal Protective Equipment - Gloves, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, and Oral Inhalation, the facility failed to ensure: 1. the licensed nurse did not retrieve medications spilled on top of the medication cart and place them back in the medication cup for ingestion by Resident Identifier (RI) #34. Further, the nurse failed to wash her hands when changing gloves while administering medications to RI #34; and 2. the licensed nurse washed her hands when removing gloves during medication administration for RI #10. Further, the nurse failed to clean RI #10's inhaler mouthpiece before storing the inhaler back in the medication cart. These deficient practices affected RI #34 and RI #10, two of four residents observed during medication pass observations, and two of four nurses observed performing medication administration. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Personal Protective Equipment - Gloves, with an Effective Date of January…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARABELLA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL