No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rivertown Health and Rehabilitation Center

4490 Virginia Loop Road, Montgomery, AL 36116 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 121 certified beds · (334) 281-6826 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (334) 281-6826 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Dr B1.1 mi
4505 Executive Park Dr · (334) 244-7299 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3801 Eastern Blvd · (334) 284-4282 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4028 Troy Hwy · (334) 281-3392 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4659 Conti Ln · (334) 788-5581 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1332 South Memorial Dr. · (334) 603-2012

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.7%12.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.0%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.6%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.9%12.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.1%24.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.8%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.8%12.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.8%21.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%80.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.9%24.8%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.2%11.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.241.961.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.191.701.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 6.6–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 3.9–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.87
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
55.9%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and a review of facility policies titled Dry Food Storage and Cold Storage Areas, the facility failed to ensure: 1) food items were dated and labeled in dry storage and;2) the freezer floor was free of ice. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1) An undated facility policy titled Dry Food Storage documented: . Procedure . 9. Opened food items should be labeled with contents, date opened and expiration or use by date . On 07/21/2025 at 2:00 PM, the surveyor toured the dry storage area with the DM, (Dietary Manager). The surveyor observed one box of light brown sugar with no open or use by date and an ant crawling on the top of the sugar box. The surveyor observed one box of powdered sugar with no open or use by date on it. On 07/23/2025 at 2:17 PM an interview was conducted with the DM. She stated that the powered and brown sugar was opened in dry storage. She could not remember the open and use by date of the items. She stated that open items should be sealed with an open and use by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and the 2017 U.S. (United States) Public Health Service Food Code the facility failed to ensure the dumpster ground was free of food debris on 07/21/2025. This had the potential to affect 98 residents who resided at the facility. Findings Include: A review of the the 2017 U.S. (United States) Public Health Service Food Code revealed: . 5-501.110 Storing Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnables.REFUSE, . shall be stored in receptacles or waste handling units so that they are inaccessible to insects and rodents . 5-501.115 Maintaining Refuse Areas and Enclosures. A storage area and enclosure for REFUSE, . shall be maintained free of unnecessary items . and clean . On 07/21/2025 at 2:33 PM, the surveyor and the Dietician Manager (DM) toured the dumpster area. There was a smell at the dumpster area and the surveyor observed there was food debris around the dumpster area which included three rib bones, and one slice of bread. On 07/23/2025 at 4:19 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the DM. She stated that she saw a rib bone at the dumpster facing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, record review, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, Safeguarding of Resident Identifiable Information, the facility failed to ensure the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) screen was closed, while Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #17 was away from the medication cart, and did not reveal medical information pertaining to Resident Identifier (RI) #112.This deficient practice affected RI #112, one of 22 sampled residents, and was observed on 07/23/2025 during the evening Medication Administration observation.This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number 2563418. Findings include:Review of an undated facility policy titled, Safeguarding of Resident Identifiable Information, revealed the following: . Policy:It is the facility's policy to implement reasonable and appropriate measures to protect and maintain the safety and confidentiality of the resident's identifiable information .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), review of the facility investigative file and a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation the facility failed to protect Resident Identifier (RI) #8's right to be free from verbal abuse perpetrated by a facility employee, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #21 on 07/10/2025 when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 and the Registered Nurse (RN)/Unit Manager #15 witnessed CNA #21 verbally abuse RI #8, a cognitively impaired resident who was already upset, when CNA #21 called RI #8 an ugly [NAME] and said she would say more to RI #8 if she was not on the clock. The Administrator said, for someone to be called an ugly [NAME] would be offensive.This affected one of three residents sampled for abuse. Findings Include: Cross-reference F740.On 07/10/2025 at 3:22 PM the State Agency received a FRI alleging verbal abuse occurred when staff witnessed CNA #21 tell RI #8 he/she was an ugly [NAME] and she would say more if she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) and the investigative file, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the Abuse Coordinator on 06/13/2025 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #12 witnessed Resident Identifier (RI) #94 push RI #110 on the shoulder. The facility failed to report to the State Agency until 06/16/2025.This deficient practice affected RI #110 and RI #94 two of three residents sampled for abuse.Findings include: On 06/16/2025 the State Agency received a FRI alleging physical abuse occurred on 06/13/2025 when RI #94 attempted to choke RI #110; on 06/16/2025 RI #110 reported to the Ombudsman that roommate RI #94 put his/her hands around RI #110's neck and attempted to choke him/her; no injury was noted; RI #110 had changed rooms on Friday 6/13/2025 and the residents had not been in contact.A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 06/11/2025, documented: . VII. Reporting/ResponseA.1. Reporting of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #21 was invited to and allowed to participate in his/her care plan meeting on 05/16/2025.This affected RI #21, one of two residents reviewed for care plan concerns.Findings include:RI #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses to include: Paraplegia, Anemia, and Osteoarthritis.RI #21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/15/2025 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated cognitively intact mental status.RI #21's most recent CARE PLAN MEETING SUMMARY document dated 05/15/2025 was reviewed and revealed: . Family . was contacted no answer, left voicemail . The space on the document for Resident/Family who attended the meeting was left blank and four staff members signed as attendees. On 07/23/2025 at 9:13 AM RI #21 was interviewed regarding the care plan process. RI #21 responded, no one had told him/her about, nor invited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review and a facility policy titled, Activities, the facility failed to offer Resident Identifier (RI) #59 activities based on his/her comprehensive assessment.This deficient practice affected RI #59 one of one resident sampled for activity concerns. Findings Include:Review of an undated facility policy titled Activities, revealed the following: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 4. Activities may be conducted in different ways: a. One-to-One Programs. b. Person Appropriate-activities relevant to the specific needs, interests, culture, background . for the resident they are developed for. c. Program of Activities- to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and review of a facility policy titled Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, the facility failed to ensure feeding tubes were managed in a manner to ensure standard of practice and prevent complications. 1) the facility failed to start Resident Identifier (RI) #109's tube feeding as ordered by the physician at the time RI #109 was admitted to the facility on the morning of 06/26/2024; and 2) the facility failed to position RI #9's head of bed (HOB) elevated at 45 degrees as care planned while RI #9's tube feeding was infusing on 07/23/2025. These deficient practices affected RI #9 and RI #109, two of three residents sampled for tube feeding.This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00048535/460742. Findings Include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, revealed the following: . Policy:It is a policy of this facility to utilize feeding tubes in accordance with current clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, resident record review, and review of a facility policy titled Behavioral Health Services, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #21 responded to resident behaviors in a manner to prevent behavior escalation and in an environment that was conducive to mental and psychosocial well-being, instead of verbally abusing Resident Identifier (RI) #8, a cognitively impaired resident. The facility further failed to ensure CNA #21 implemented interventions that were in place to address RI #8's Behavioral Symptoms to include avoiding power struggles and maintaining a calm environment and approach to the resident. This deficient practice affected RI #8 one of two residents sampled for behaviors. Findings include: Cross-reference F600. On 07/10/2025 at 3:22 PM the State Agency received a FRI alleging verbal abuse occurred when staff witnessed CNA #21 tell RI #8 he/she was an ugly [NAME] and she would say more if she was not on the clock. An undated facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility document and policy reviews, the facility failed to protect 17 residents from misappropriation of resident property by the diversion of the residents' Schedule II controlled (narcotic) medications. This failure affected 17 (Residents #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, and #20) of 18 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, implemented on 08/25/2023, indicated, . It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit . exploitation and misappropriation of resident property .Definitions .Misappropriation of Resident Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent, use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent . The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report two injuries of unknown origin to the state survey agency for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Accidents and Incidents - Investigation and Reporting, revised 07/2017, indicated, .All accidents and incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc. occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator . Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, with an implementation date of 08/25/2023, indicated under the IV. Identification of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation section that possible indicators of abuse included but were not limited to: 3. Physical injury of a resident, of unknown source. The policy further indicated under the VII. Reporting/Response section that A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate two injuries of unknown origin for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Accidents and Incidents - Investigation and Reporting, revised 07/2017, indicated, .All accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator . Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, with an implementation date of 08/25/2023, indicated under the IV. Identification of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation section that possible indicators of abuse included but were not limited to: 3. Physical injury of a resident, of unknown source. The policy further indicated, V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Part of the written procedures for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement care plan interventions to address a resident removing their wander monitoring bracelet for one (Resident #2) of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement risk. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, revealed, .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy further indicated, Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change . A review of Resident #2's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 03/16/2022 with diagnoses that included Paranoid Schizophrenia, Dementia, Mood Disorder, and Metabolic Encephalopathy (a condition in which the brain function is disturbed either temporarily or permanently due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were readily available and retained for two (Resident #3 and Resident #14) of six residents sampled as closed records. Findings included: During an interview on [DATE] at 9:35 AM, the [NAME] President (VP) of Clinical Operations stated the facility's new owner was on the way to the facility, and she would have him reach out to the previous owners for resident records. During a follow-up interview on [DATE] at 10:10 AM, the VP of Clinical Operations provided a copy of a contract with the facility's electronic health record (EHR) company indicating the current owners would only be able to access records for residents that were on the census as of [DATE]. A review of a Data Copy Authorization for Acquisitions and Transfers of Data between Entities, signed by the facility's previous owner on [DATE], confirmed the previous owner instructed the EHR company to only provide resident records to the current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination by: 1.) storing a 50-pound bag of sugar directly on the floor, 2.) running ceiling fans with heavy dust build-up on the blades in the dishwashing area, and 3.) allowing the drain from the dishmachine to extend down into the floor drain. This had the potential to affect 95 of 95 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1.) The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . 3-305.11 Food Storage. (A) . FOOD shall be protected from contamination by storing the FOOD: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm [centimeters] (6 inches) above the floor. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/08/2023 at 11:20 AM, an unopened, 50-pound bag of sugar was observed sitting directly on the floor of the Dry Storage Room. A delivery label…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were kept closed and there was not discarded equipment and food-related litter around the dumpsters to attract vermin on 01/08/2023 and 01/09/2023. This had the potential to affect 98 of 98 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: A review of the 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA revealed the following: . 5-501.15 Outside Receptacles. (A) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE . used with materials containing FOOD residue and used outside the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be designed and constructed to have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers. (B) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE . shall be installed so that accumulation of debris and insect and rodent attraction and harborage are minimized and effective cleaning is facilitated around and . under the unit. 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles. Receptacles and waste handling units for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-11 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Process (QAPI) meeting attendance records, the facility failed to ensure the QAPI committee was composed of the required committee members. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that the Infection Preventionist (IP) participated as a required QAPI committee member. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 98 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the facility's QAPI Meeting sign-in sheets dated 05/2022, 6/2022, 7/2022, 8/2022, 9/2022, 11/2022, and 12/2022 revealed an IP had not signed as present during the meetings. In an interview on 01/11/2023 at 4:17 PM, Employee Identifier (EI #1), Administrator, stated the facility's Infection Preventionist left in April 2022. EI #1 stated EI #8, Registered Nurse (RN)/ Regional Infection Control has been the facility's interim IP. EI #1 said, the members of the QAPI committee were herself, the DON, the medical director, the social worker, the MDS Coordinator, Dietary, and the Business…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of the Maintenance Supervisor's Job Description and review of a facility document titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, the facility failed to ensure Room Locators (RL) #1-9, were not found in need of repair. This affected nine RLs out of 78 RLs observed. Findings Include: An undated and unsigned facility Job Description for the Maintenance Supervisor documented: . SUMMARY Responsible and accountable for maintaining physical plant and essential mechanical, electrical, and resident care equipment in safe operating condition. ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES . Maintenance and beautification of facility and grounds. Review of a facility policy with a revised date of May 2017, titled Quality of Life - Homelike Environment revealed: Policy Statement Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . On 01/08/2023 at 11:44 AM, RL #3 was observed with paint scraped from the wall. On 01/09/2023 at 8:29 AM, RL #2 was observed with paint scraped from the wall behind the bed. On 01/09/2023 at 12:08 PM, RL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #88's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 12/21/2021, 05/31/2022, and 06/25/2022 were accurately coded to reflect RI #88 as a current tobacco user. This deficient practice had the potential to affect RI #88, one of 24 sampled residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed: . SECTION J: HEALTH CONDITIONS . J1300: Current Tobacco Use . RI #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. RI #88's comprehensive care plans included a care plan, initiated 12/24/2021, identifying RI #88 as a smoker. On 01/10/2023 at 7:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed RI #88's comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #24's and #14's medical record including the PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Screening & Results, and the facility policy titled, admission Criteria (used as their guidance for the pre-admission screening process), the facility failed to ensure a valid Level 1 PASRR was completed for RI #24 and RI #14. This had the potential to affect RI #24 and #14, two of ten residents whose Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) were reviewed for completion. Findings Include: The facility policy titled, admission Criteria with a revision date of December 2016, revealed, Policy Statement Our facility will admit only those residents whose medical and nursing care needs can be met. 1. The objectives of our admission criteria policy are to: a. provide uniform criteria for admitting residents to the facility; b. admit residents who can be cared for adequately by the facility; . 6. Residents will be admitted to this facility if their nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) RI #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia and Dysphagia. Review of RI #7's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/24/2022 for a regular diet, puree texture, thin consistency, one time per day at lunch. RI #7 also had an order dated 01/08/2023 for enteral feeding every shift for nutrition with Isosource 1.5 at 50 cc/hr (cubic centimeters/hour) via Kangaroo Pump. Review of RI #7's care plan revealed a care plan with an initiation date of 10/24/2022 for being fed by tube, but there was not a plan of care for RI #7 receiving a regular diet, puree texture, thin consistency, one time per day at lunch. On 01/10/2023 at 12:39 PM, RI #7 was observed being assisted with a pureed texture lunch tray. In an interview on 01/11/2023 at 9:35 AM, EI #7, MDS Coordinator, stated RI #7 received nutrient intake by PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube feeding and a PO (per os/by mouth) diet. EI #7 stated the concern with the care plan not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled, Enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions, the facility failed to ensure the Enteral Nutrition provided to Resident Identifier (RI) #3 and RI #71 were labeled appropriately on 01/08/2023. This had the potential to affect RI #3 and RI #71, two of six residents who received Enteral Nutrition. Findings Include: A facility policy titled, Enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions with a revision date of November 2018, documented, . Purpose To ensure the safe administration of enteral nutrition. Preparation 1. All personnel responsible for preparing, storing and administering enteral nutrition formulas will be trained, qualified and competent in his or her responsibilities. 2. The facility will remain current in and follow accepted best practices in enteral nutrition. General Guidelines . Preventing errors in administration 1. Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check the following information: a. Resident name,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident record reviews, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #54 and RI #48 received 9:00 AM scheduled medication within the time frame of one hour before or one hour after the scheduled time on 01/08/2023. This had the potential to affect two of the six residents observed for medication pass. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications with a revised date of December 2013 revealed, Policy Statement Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. 4. Medications must be administered within (1) one hour of their prescribed time, . Review of an undated facility document titled Medication Pass Observation-Skills Test revealed, OBSERVATION . Medication is administered at correct time (1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of a facility policy Perineal Care, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene before applying a clean brief during incontinent care for Resident Identifier (RI) #17. This was observed on 01/10/2023 and had the potential to affect RI #17, one of two residents observed for incontinent care. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Perineal Care with a revised date of February 2018 revealed, Purpose The purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition. Steps in the Procedure . 7. Put on gloves . b. Wash perineal area . (5) discard soiled gloves, wash hands and re-glove. e. wash the rectal area . g. Discard soiled gloves, wash hands and re-glove. h. Apply clean brief. RI #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each bed having ceiling suspended curtains, extended around the bed to provide total visual privacy, in combination with adjacent walls and curtains, in Room Locators (RL) #1, #3, and #7. This affected three of 39 semi-private rooms at the facility. Findings Include: On 01/11/2023 beginning at 10:48 AM, the following observations were made with Employee Identifier (EI) #4, Maintenance Director from a sister facility: - RL #1's privacy curtain was observed by the surveyor and appeared too short for the track for Bed A. EI #4 was asked to check the privacy curtain. EI #4 pulled the privacy curtain and said the privacy curtain was about two and a half feet too short. - RL #3's privacy curtain was observed by the surveyor and appeared too short for the track for Bed A. EI #4 was asked to check the length of the curtains for both A and B beds. EI#4 pulled the privacy curtain and said it was over a foot short for A bed and about three feet too short for B bed. - RL #7's privacy curtain was observed by the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-09-23 · tag F0636 — widespread
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, review of a facility policy titled Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, the facility failed to ensure Comprehensive Minimal Data Sets (MDS) assessments for Resident Identifiers (RI) #9, 14, 15, 49, 109, 112, and 257 were completed timely. This affected seven of seven Comprehensive MDS assessments reviewed for completion. Findings Included: A review of a facility policy titled Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process, with a revised date of December 2016 revealed: . Assessment and information . (2) Complete the Minimum Data Set within 14 days after admission, . and annually. A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, with a date of October 2019 revealed: . Chapter Two: Assessments for the RAI . RAI . required Assessment Summary . admission (Comprehensive) . MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-09-23 · tag F0638 — widespread
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled MDS (Minimum Data Set) Completion and Submission Timeframes, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 16,17, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 40, 45, 46, and 47's Quarterly MDS assessments were completed. This affected 18 of 18 residents who were reviewed for timely completion of Quarterly MDS assessments. Findings Include: A review of facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes with a revised date of July 2017 revealed: Policy Statement Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled POT AND PAN WASHING, the facility failed to ensure cookwares were not sanitized improperly when a dietary aid submerged cookware in the sanitizing solution for less than one minute and then placed the cookware on a rack to air dry. This had the potential to affect 61 of 61 resident who received meals from the kitchen on 9/23/21. Findings Include: A review of an undated facility policy titled POT AND PAN WASHING revealed: . POLICY: Proper pot and pan washing procedure reduce the possibility of food contamination. The following procedures will be used: PROCEDURE: . 4. Pots and pans are sanitized in the third sink using warm water and bleach or sanitizer to provide no less than 50 PPM (parts per million) chlorine in solution for one minute. A review of the product label for the Oasis 146 Multi-Quat Sanitizer revealed: . DIRECTIONS FOR USE: . TO SANITIZE FOOD CONTACT SURFACES . Use Oasis 146 Multi-Quat Sanitizer to sanitize . food utensils, dishes . Expose all surfaces to the sanitizing solution for a period of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-23 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, a review of a facility policy titled MDS (Minimum Data Set) Completion and Submission Timeframes, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, the facility failed to ensure timely submissions of MDS assessments for Resident Identifiers (RI) #1, 6, 7, 8, 16, and 45. This affected six of nine residents who's completed MDS assessments were reviewed for timely submission. Findings Included: A review of a facility policy titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes with a revised date of July 2017 revealed: Policy Statement Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of facility policies titled Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process and Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #257 had Comprehensive care plans developed and implemented within 21 days of admission. This affected one of one resident who was reviewed for timely development and implementation of comprehensive care plans. Finding Include: A review of a facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revised date of December 2016 revealed: Policy Statement A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 12. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment (MDS). A review of another facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled Wound Care, the facility failed to provide evidence wound care was provided to Resident Identifier (RI) #109's right buttocks daily as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice affected RI #109; one of three residents sampled for Pressure Ulcers. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled Wound Care, with a revised date of 10/2010, revealed the following: Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Preparation 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Documentation The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: . 4. The name and title of the individual performing the wound care. RI #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 9/14/21, with a diagnosis of Generalized Muscle Weakness. RI #109's admission Minimum Data Set assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of a document received from the facility titled Food Preferences, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #257's dietary preferences were honored when he/she received a ham sandwich in his/her Dialysis sack lunch on 9/22/21 after the resident had pork listed as a dislike on his/her dietary preferences. This affect one of one resident whose dietary preferences were reviewed. Findings Include: An undated document received from the facility from Health Technologies, Inc. Guideline & Procedure Manual, 2016 Edition titled Food Preferences revealed: Guideline: Dining Services Department will gather information upon admission to the facility regarding resident food preferences. Procedure: 1. Following admission to the facility, and periodically as necessary, the Dining Services Manager . will interview the resident to determine foods preferred . A form such as Food Preferences Form may be used to document this information and filed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of a facility policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, the facility failed to ensure the required data was on the staff posting form, to include census, current date and the number of staff working and actual hours worked for all nursing staff.This deficient practice was observed on three of four days of the survey and had the potential to affect all 98 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, revealed the following: . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information:a. Facility nameb. The current datec. Facility's current resident censusd. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift:i. Registered Nurses [RN]ii. Licensed Practical Nurses [LPN]/Licensed Vocational Nursesiii.Certified Nurse Aides [CNA] .4. A copy of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-01-11 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure the survey results for the last three years were available for residents or visitors to review. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 98 residents who resided in the facility. Findings Include: On 01/11/2023 at 10:25 AM the surveyor observed a sign in the front lobby indicating the facility's survey reports were available for review in the binder located below the sign. Upon review of the contents of the binder, it was noted multiple survey reports were missing. Employee Identifier (EI) #1, the Administrator, stated she and Social Services maintained the binder containing the prior survey reports. During an interview on 01/11/2023 at 12:30 PM, with EI #1, the facility's survey history over the previous three years was reviewed to include the following surveys: 02/12/2020- follow-up survey conducted by desk review 07/07/2020 - Focus Infection Control Survey (FICS) 08/04/2020 - FICS 10/21/2020 - FICS 11/11/2020 - FICS 05/21/2021 - Complaint survey 07/19/2021 - follow-up survey conducted by desk review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ARABELLA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARABELLA HEALTH & WELLNESS OF MONTGOMERY PROPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/25/2023
HERTZEL, CHAIMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/25/2023
ARABELLA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
AZZAM, MOHANNADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2023
HAXTON, MEGHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FEIN, MIRIAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
ZLOTOWITZ, ELIYAHUIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2025
ARCO KANO IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2024
GNH IRRV TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2024
HWOOD PARTNERS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/04/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$548K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 95%Medicare 2%Other / private 3%

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $548K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$257per resident / day
operating cost
$7,827per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$252per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alabama Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Alabama
$8,334/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,787/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,425/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 015228. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next