Magnolia Haven Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 85.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.06 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-06-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and a policy titled .Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 90 was free from resident to resident physical abuse perpetrated by RI #57. The facility failed to implement timely and effective interventions to prevent resident to resident abuse on 04/15/2025 after RI #57 complained to staff about RI #90 entering his/her room without permission. On 04/16/2025, RI #57 pushed RI #90 from his/her room into the hallway, causing him/her to fall and sustain a laceration above the left eye and Contrast Tomography (CT) confirmed fractures of the left maxillary sinus wall and left orbital wall.This deficient practice affected RI #90, one of six sampled residents reviewed for abuse.This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/ report number #463612. Findings Include:Cross-Reference F740.On 04/16/2025 at 1:16 PM, the Alabama State Survey Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, the facility's policies for DIET MANUAL and MENUS, the facility's menus for Spring/Summer 2026, and the facility's posted SCOOP AND DIPPER SIZES; the facility failed to ensure a #10 dipper/scoop was used for Chopped Meat (Hamburger Steak) for Lunch on Tues. 6/23/2026, a #6 dipper/scoop was used for Puree Lasagna for Dinner on Tues. 6/23/2026, and a #10 dipper/scoop was used for Chopped Fried Chicken and a #10 dipper/scoop was used for Puree Chicken when serving Lunch on Wed. 6/24/2026. This affected residents receiving chopped meats, Mechanical Soft diets, and Puree diets; 36 of 84 residents receiving meals at the facility and had the potential to result in weight loss. The facility's policy for DIET MANUAL, revised 8/2017, included the following: . PROCEDURE: . 4. The diet manual is the reference for regular, texture-modified and therapeutic diet orders.5. The diet manual is used as the basis for the planned menu and menu modifications. The facility's policy for MENUS, revised 12/2023, included the following: . POLICY:Menus are planned to meet the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, a repair/service report, and the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code; the facility failed to ensure food was frozen solid in the Reach-in Bread Freezer on 6/22/2026 and further failed to ensure the internal temperature did not reach 45 (degrees) Fahrenheit (F). This had the potential to affect 84 of 84 residents receiving meals from the facility's Food Service Department and possibly exposing them to food borne illness.The 2022 U.S. FDA Food Code included the following: . Temperature and time Control3-501.11 Frozen Food.Stored frozen FOODS shall be maintained frozen.3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding.(A) . TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: .(2) At 5 C (41 F) or less. FDA Food Code 2022 Annex 3. Public Health Reasons/Administrative Guidelines3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food [TCS], Hot and Cold Holding.Bacterial growth and/or toxin production can occur if time/temperature control for safety food remains in the temperature Danger Zone of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0813 — widespread
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, the Resident Council, and the facility's policy for FOOD FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES, the facility failed to ensure there was a refrigerated area for storage of food brought in to the residents by family and friends. Eleven of eleven residents attending Resident Council on 6/24/2026 affirmed they wanted refrigeration space to be able to store personal food. This had the potential to affect all residents requiring safe storage for personal food requiring refrigeration, 84 of 84 residents eating meals in the facility. The facility's policy for FOOD FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES, revised 10/2017 and reviewed 11/2023, included the following:POLICY: . Food that is brought to residents from family, visitors or volunteers is handled in a safe and sanitary manner. PROCEDURE: . 4. Residents may accept precooked foods from family members or other visitors. Foods may be brought for a specific resident and shared with other residents. b. Food brought to a resident by a family member or visitor may be stored in the food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, Resident Council, the facility's policy for Daily Dumpster Monitoring, the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and the facility's pest control service records; the facility failed to ensure there was not a build-up of greasy particles on the oil/grease refuse container, there was not a scattering of small particles of trash around the two dumpsters, and there was not a concentration of 30 to 40 flies in the dumpster area on 6/22/2026. This had the potential result of attracting rodents and flies, which could enter the facility to cause contamination and exposure to bites and maggots. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #8, six of eleven residents in Resident Council, and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, 88 of 88 residents. The facility's policy for Daily Dumpster Monitoring, dated 10/2006, included the following: . POLICY:Maintenance and Housekeeping staff will inspect all dumpsters each day to ensure that the surrounding area are free of debris and that the dumpster lids are closed .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-06-30 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Report, the facility failed to report accurate staffing data from January 01, 2026 - March 31, 2026, to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).This failure affected one quarter of data reviewed during the survey. Findings Include: The PBJ report generated for the quarter of 01/01/2026 through 03/31/2026 documented: . This Staffing Data Report identifies areas of concern that will be triggered . Metric .Excessively Low Weekend Staffing . Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low .On 06/25/2026 at 3:45 PM, during an interview, the Administrator (ADM) stated she was responsible for submitting staffing data to CMS. The ADM said she did not know why low weekend staffing was triggered for the second quarter of 2026. She said she compiled the data for the report, sent the information to corporate and a third party company submitted the data to CMS. She said if incorrect data was submitted, CMS would not have accurate information concerning staffing.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policies titled, . TELS Maintenance Services Work Order and . Standard Method of Cleaning Checklist the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, and homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain resident care areas were in good repair and in a sanitary condition as evidenced broken tiles behind the commode in the bathroom belonging to Resident Identifier (RI) #34, RI #26, RI #72, and RI #1. Additionally, the bathroom belonging to RI #8, RI #57, RI #5 and RI #36 had a water damaged wall and dirty floors with urine observed on the floor.These failures affected RI #34, #26, #72, #1, #8, #57, #5, and #36. These failures had the potential to affect residents by exposing them to an environment that was not maintained in a clean, safe and homelike condition.Findings Include: A facility policy titled, TELS Maintenance Services Work Order with an effective date of 08/01/2022 documented: . PROCEDURE: 1. Whenever a need for maintenance services is detected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and a policy titled, . Advance Directives and Refusal of Treatment the facility failed to ensure documentation regarding advance directives was complete and accurate. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain documentation that advance directives were discussed with Resident Identifier (RI) #81 and failed to ensure the advance directive documentation for RI #7 accurately reflected the resident's status. These failures had the potential to affect residents by preventing the facility from accurately identifying and honoring residents' advance directive decisions for 2 of 7 residents reviewed. Findings Include: A facility policy titled, . Advance Directives and Refusal of Treatment revised 11/2013 documented: PURPOSE:The resident has the right to refuse treatment, . to formulate an advance directive for management of his/her care.PROCESS:Prior to admission, the resident/sponsor will be provided information about the following:Advance Directives . Upon the resident's admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a physician's order to notify the medical provider when the Resident Identifier (RI) #89's blood glucose exceeded the ordered parameter of 250 mg/dL (milligrams/deciliter). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 03/07/2025 directing staff to check the resident's blood glucose four times daily before meals and at bedtime, document the results, and notify the medical provider for blood glucose readings below 70 mg/dL or above 250 mg/dL.Review of the Nurse Medication Administration History dated 03/01/2025 through 03/31/2025 revealed RI #89's had multiple blood glucose readings that exceeded the physician ordered notification and the medical provider was not notified. This deficient practice affected RI #89 one of four residents whose Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed for physician notification during the survey. This citation was cited as a result of complaint/report number 463611. Findings include:A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Alabama Department of Mental Health Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ( PASRR) Level I Screening and Determination documentation, the facility failed to ensure compliance with PASRR requirements for Resident Identifier (RI) #5 by failing to ensure completion of the required PASRR Level II Evaluation. Record review revealed RI #5 had diagnoses including Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Despite the Level I screening dated 11/07/2024 identifying the need for a Level II Evaluation, the required evaluation was not completed until 01/23/2026. This deficient practice placed RI #5 at risk for not being comprehensively evaluated to determine the need for specialized services and support to address RI #5 mental health needs, as required under PASRR regulations. The facility's failure to ensure completion of the required PASRR Level II Evaluation affected RI #5, one of three residents reviewed for PASRR compliance.Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the use of oxygen for Resident Identifier (RI) #1 and RI #35.This deficient practice affected RI #1 and RI #35 two of 30 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings Include:Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans with a revised date of 09/2009 documented: . PURPOSE: Plans of Care are developed by the interdisciplinary team, to coordinate and communicate the plan of care for the resident. STANDARD: . the facility develops a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical needs, nursing and mental/psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment.PROCESS: . d) Comprehensive Plan of Care- within 7 days of the full assessments (admission, significant change, significant correction of prior full assessment and annual).1) RI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BALL HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL