No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sandstone Of Tucson Rehab Centre

2900 East Milber Street, Tucson, AZ 85714 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 240 certified beds · (520) 294-0005 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)2 actual-harm citations$43,134 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $43,134 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-03)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2800 E Ajo Way · (520) 874-9000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2800 E Ajo Way · (520) 874-4062 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4100 S Palo Verde Rd · (520) 351-1558 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3840 S Palo Verde Rd · (855) 963-8432

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.4%10.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.2%3.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.2%2.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.7%12.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.8%21.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.5%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.2%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.1%10.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%87.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.3%23.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.2%10.4%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.3%CMS range 52.2–76.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.7–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge81.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge76.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 3.2–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
46.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 118.1 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 122 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-03)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the rights of two of four sampled residents (Residents #16, #45) to be free from abuse by another resident (#26 and #121). The universe was 117. The deficient practice could lead to additional resident-to-resident altercations, creating an unsafe environment.Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #45 and Resident #121 A facility-reported incident form dated March 31, 2026, revealed that Resident #121 stated that she overheard Resident #45 speaking to someone on the phone and was speaking negatively of the facility, and called Resident #121 a bad name. The report included that Resident #121 proceeded to get out of her bed and went over to Resident #45, and said 'What did you say about me?' Resident #121 said Resident #45 made a slapping motion towards her, Resident #121 blocked the motion, and then Resident #121 grabbed Resident #45's wrist and struck Resident #45 with a closed fist on the cranial/facial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure residents (#1, #3, and #5) were free from abuse and neglect. The deficient practice could lead to physical and psychosocial harm to the residents. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #1 and #2 -Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included spinal stenosis, Dementia, and major depressive disorder. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 indicating moderate cognitive mpairment. -Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included rib fractures, anxiety disorder, low vision in the Right eye, psychosis and Dementia. A review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 02 indicated severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS also noted that Resident #2 was also inattentive, experienced disorganized thinking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was reported to the applicable and required state agencies within 2 hours, for two of four sampled residents (#50 and #40). The deficient practice could result in an allegation of abuse not being reported and investigated in a timely manner, and could result in continued harm to residents.Findings include:Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, bipolar disorder, and heart failure.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment.A Nursing Note dated May 4, 2026, at 3:43 p.m. revealed Resident #50 was observed with small discoloration / light bruising to her right outer arm. The note revealed Resident #50 stated she hit her arm on the door and was unable to recall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. The deficient practice could lead to pests in the kitchen and/or spread of infection to residents.Findings include:A blank kitchen Daily Cleaning Log revealed a list of tasks including Wash & Sanitize Prep Tables / Countertops, Wash & Sanitize Dining Room Tables, Sweep & Mop Kitchen Floor, and the log also included a blank space for staff responsible, and a check box for each day of the week.A blank Validation Checklist Kitchen Observation revealed to walk through the kitchen at the start and end of every shift. The document included a list of tasks that included Floor is clean and free of debris, Canned goods have an uncompromised seal, Bottom shelves throughout kitchen clean and sanitized, and no clutter on Bottom shelves throughout. The log included a check box for each day of the week.A formal request was submitted to the facility on May 7, 2026, for a kitchen cleaning log form, and any kitchen cleaning logs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for one of four sampled residents (#20) regarding a fall. The deficient practice could result in care team members not being fully aware of a resident's condition and could cause missed care and treatment.Findings include:Resident #20 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dementia, anemia, difficulty in walking, and anxiety disorder.A care plan focus initiated on October 21, 2018, revealed that Resident #20 was at risk for falls due to dementia causing confusion, poor safety awareness, incontinence, and hemiplegia to the right dominant side. There was no evidence of revisions or additions to the care plan focus following a fall incident on April 24, 2026.Another care plan focus initiated on October 21, 2018, revealed Resident #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation was reported to mandated entities and within the required timeframe for 1 of 24 sampled residents (#42). The deficient practice could lead to allegations of misappropriation not being investigated thoroughly and timely. -Findings include:A complaint received by the state agency on February 11, 2026, revealed that it was reported a couple of weeks prior, that Resident #42 was missing his wallet with $2,000.00, a bank card and identification. The complaint also revealed that the resident's son reported that there was a reoccurring charge on the account for about $800.00 a month. The complaint revealed that the facility helped cancel the bank card.However, review of facility records revealed that the incident was initially reported on December 16, 2025.-Regarding Resident #42Resident #42 was first admitted to the facility September 08, 2024, and re-admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 24 sampled residents (#118) was protected from a preventable accident, related to a fall from the bed during brief change. The deficient practice could lead to physical injury of a resident.-Findings include:Resident #118 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and other problems related to life management difficulty.A care plan revised November 3, 2023, revealed Resident #118 had limited physical mobility.An annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #118 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Section GG revealed the resident had limited range of motion on both sides of his upper and lower extremities. Additionally, the resident was dependent on staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#6) to be free from abuse from another resident (#9). The deficient practice could lead to sustaining injuries.Findings include:Related to Resident #6-Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes fusion of the spine, lower back pain, and Major Depressive Disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #6 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact.Review of the Progress Notes in the clinical record, revealed a Nurses Note created by Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #65), dated February 2, 2026 at 7:01 P.M. The note indicated that around 6:35 P.M., Resident #6 reported that he was physically attacked by his roommate. The same note further revealed that there were visible injuries which included a skin tear on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure a signed consent was obtained before starting a new psychotropic medication for one resident, #4. The deficient practice could lead to a resident's responsible party not being informed of the risk and benefits of a resident's medications. Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; Urinary Tract Infections (UTI); and repeated falls.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 underwent a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 02 which indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The same MDS further revealed that Resident #4 exhibited behaviors such as physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms that are not directed towards others, however it did significantly interfere with her care and participation in activities. It also noted that Resident #4 also exhibited rejection of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse for one resident (#4) was reported to the State Agency (SA) within the timeframe established by regulations. The deficient practice could lead to continued abuse of residents.Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; Urinary Tract Infections (UTI); and repeated falls.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 underwent a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 02 which indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The same MDS further revealed that Resident #4 exhibited behaviors such as physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms that are not directed towards others, however it did significantly interfere with her care and participation in activities.Review of the care plan indicated that Resident #4 had the potential for behaviors which required staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect one resident (#511) rights in a manner that promotes enhancement of the resident's quality of life by having her own cell phone to access persons and services outside the facility. The deficient practice could lead to residents' rights being violated.Findings include:Resident #511 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, factitious disorder imposed on self, borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and Huntington's disease.Resident's Clinical Resident Profile revealed that she was her own responsible party/representative.The resident had another care plan initially dated on August 15, 2023, and revised on January 15, 2025, which revealed the resident has a potential risk for alteration in mood state and psychosocial well-being related to panic disorder. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#911) to be free from physical abuse by another resident. The deficient practice could result in further abuse of residents and appropriate action not taken.Findings include: -Resident #911 (alleged victim) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of aphasia, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A physician order dated January 17, 2025 indicated for resident to reside on secured unit due to vascular dementia. Review of the psycho-social/trauma care plan revised on January 14, 2026 revealed the resident was at risk for psycho-social well-being problem related to dementia with behaviors, anxiety and history of substance abuse. The care plan noted that the resident was involved in an altercation with another resident on January 12, 2026. The goal set was that resident will minimize risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#333) to be free from financial misappropriation/exploitation of resident property by another resident (#111). The deficient practice could result in further financial abuse of residents when appropriate actions are not taken.-Regarding Resident #111 (alleged perpetrator):Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, obesity, and life management difficulty.Review of the care plan dated August 19, 2023, revealed that the resident has psychological aspects of chronic illness. The interventions included providing the Resident/Representative a list of community resources, and identifying the disease progression and when to notify the health care provider.A care plan dated October 25, 2023, revealed the resident has a history of self-harmful ideation (thoughts) and/or behaviors. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to maintain documentation that an alleged violation related to the allegation of financial misappropriation of property for one resident (#333) by another resident (#111) was thoroughly investigated. The deficient practice could result in further financial abuse of residents when appropriate actions are not taken.-Regarding Resident #111 (alleged perpetrator):Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, obesity, and life management difficulty.Review of the care plan dated August 19, 2023, revealed that the resident has psychological aspects of chronic illness. The interventions included providing the Resident/Representative a list of community resources, and identifying the disease progression and when to notify the health care provider.A care plan dated October 25, 2023, revealed the resident has a history of self-harmful…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for one resident (#191), which provides instructions to meet the resident's immediate needs. The deficient practice could result in resident's treatments and needs not appropriately addressed.Findings Include:Resident #191 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (is a rare muscle injury where your muscles break down), adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit.A review of the Clinical admission Evaluation progress note dated August 3, 2024, revealed that the resident's admission mode was wheelchair. The Resident was alert and oriented times 3; alert (some forgetfulness).A physician-admission history and physical progress note dated August 3, 2024, revealed per documentation that resident was in a medical center…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to review and revised the care plan for one resident (#191) after each fall incident. The deficient practice could place the resident at risk for more falls.Findings Include:Resident #191 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (is a rare muscle injury where your muscles break down), adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit.A review of the Clinical admission Evaluation progress note dated August 3, 2024, revealed that the resident's admission mode was wheelchair. The Resident was alert and oriented times 3; alert (some forgetfulness).A physician-admission history and physical progress note dated August 3, 2024, revealed per documentation that resident was in a medical center with a 2- day history of weakness and falls at home, unable to ambulate with associated dizziness.An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to identify elopement risks, and plan for effective supervision for resident one of three sampled residents (#888) related to risk factors for cognitively intact residents, and to ensure that one resident (#511) was supervised during activity sessions, and that activities were conducted safely. The deficient practice could result in avoidable accidents.Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #511 Resident #511 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, factitious disorder imposed on self, borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and Huntington's disease (is an inherited disorder, and develop uncontrollable dance-like movements (chorea) and abnormal body postures, as well as problems with behavior, emotion, thinking, and personality). The Resident's Clinical Resident Profile revealed that she was her own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident, family, and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (#10) rights to be free from abuse by another resident (#5). This deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include:-Resident #5 (Alleged Perpetrator) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include depression, psychosis, anxiety, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated November October 6, 2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognitive function. A review of Resident #5's care-plan revealed the resident had a confirmed resident to resident altercation, and a history of such, as well as a history of resident to staff altercations, with noted goals including, resident will have no altercations with staff or residents through the review date, and noted interventions of remove resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to protect The rights of one resident (# 07) to be free from verbal and physical abuse by another resident (#33). This deficient practice has the potential to violate the resident's right to safety and prevent further harm. The sample size was 5. The facility census was 122. Findings include: -Regarding resident #7 Resident # 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; unspecified mood (affective) disorder, and autistic disorder. A review of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Care Conference dated June 24, 2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A review of the shower sheet dated December 2, 2025 revealed no issues were identified on the skin.A review of the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to protect the residents rights to be free from abuse by staff and other resident (#21, #9, #13, #2, #44, #10, #16, #40, #41, #42). The deficient practice could lead to further instances of abuse, thereby promoting an unsafe environment.Findings Include: -Regarding Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including paranoid schizophrenia, altered mental status, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, unspecified mental disorder due to known physiological condition, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. A review of the modification of admission MDS (minimum data set) dated February 2, 2024 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 0, indicating severe cognitive impairment. No potential indicators of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for the documentation and reporting of alleged violations involving abuse for resident (#26). The deficient practice resulted in an allegation of abuse not being reported timely, and the potential for a resident not being protected from further abuse.-Regarding Resident #26Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE] and subsequently discharged on October 26, 2022 with diagnosis including morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, cellulitis, anemia, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, chronic and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and unspecified schizoaffective disorder.Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated October 13, 2022 for a behavioral health services consultation. Additionally, an order was observed for Quetiapine Fumarate 100mg tablet to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#200) was free from physical abuse from other residents (resident #300), and the facility failed to ensure that one resident #400 was free from abuse from staff. This deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include:- Regarding resident #200 and resident #300. Review of information received from the SA complaint tracking system on October 18, 2025 at 5:40 a.m. revealed that on October 16, 2025 a complaint was received that revealed that resident #200 and resident #300 got into a verbal altercation in the dining room. The residents were separated, and then resident #300 took her electric chair and hit resident #200 in the leg, then the residents were again separated. -Resident #200Resident #200 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include heart disease, pneumonia, dementia, anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #2 and #6) to be free from abuse by another resident (Resident # 1 and #5). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.Regarding Resident #1 on Resident #2 Abuse:-Regarding Resident #1:Resident # 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included, sepsis, bacteremia, urinary tract infection, Schizophrenia, restlessness and agitation.A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that was unable to be completed due to Resident # 1 not understanding the questions and having a severely impaired altered level of consciousness. The MDS also revealed a history of physical behavior directed toward others.A comprehensive care plan dated October 22, 2025, revealed that Resident #1 had Schizophrenia symptoms that are manifested by cognitive memory impairment, and decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of on resident to be free from abuse (#2) by another resident (#4). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically and emotionally injured.-Regarding Resident #2Resident #2 was admitted to the facility March 27, 2025 with diagnosis including; cerebral palsy, unspecified, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side, unspecified dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, anxiety disorder, unspecified, impulse disorder, unspecified.Review of a care plan, initiated March 29, 2025, revealed the following areas of focus:Behaviors, the individual exhibits disruptive interpersonal behavior characterized by initiating or exacerbating conflicts among peers.Impaired physical mobility and cognitive impairment such as memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to implement its policies for preventing and prohibiting abuse were implemented consistently by staff, resulting in a delay in reporting resident to resident abuse to the state agencies, physician, abuse coordinator and family.Findings include:Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) follow-up report dated August 22, 2025, revealed on August 21, 2025 at Resident #2 and Resident #4 were in their shared room and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #8) documented that Resident #4 told Resident #2 to stop yelling or he was going to beat him up. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/staff #10) was present in the resident's room and was able to stand in between the residents, redirecting Resident #4 back to the bed on his side of the room. The facility conclusion verified the allegation. -Regarding Resident #2Resident #2 was admitted to the facility March 27, 2025 with diagnosis including cerebral palsy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of documentation, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations of abuse were reported to the state agency and other mandated entities within the required timeframe for two residents (#2) and (#4). The deficient practice could lead to a failure of the facility to report allegations of abuse timely, and could lead to continued abuse for a resident.Findings include:Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) follow-up report dated August 22, 2025, revealed on August 21, 2025 at Resident #2 and Resident #4 were in their shared room and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #8) documented that Resident #4 told Resident #2 to stop yelling or he was going to beat him up. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA/staff #10) was present in the resident's room and was able to stand in between the residents, redirecting Resident #4 back to the bed on his side of the room. The facility conclusion verified the allegation. -Regarding Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of two residents (#69, #77) to be free from abuse by another resident (#81, #76). The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.Findings include: -Regarding Abuse allegation between Resident #77 (alleged victim) and Resident #76 (alleged perpetrator): Resident #77 (alleged victim) Resident #77 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus and delirium. The assessment also indicated no evidence of behavioral symptoms were exhibited. A care plan revealed the following areas of focus:-Elopement risk/wanderer, , with interventions that included offering diversions and structured activities. -A second focus of elopement risk and/or exhibits wandering behavior related to vascular dementia. Interventions included to offer diversions, structured activities when wandering has increased.-On a secured unit related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency for one resident (#69). The deficient practice could result in abuse allegations not being reported. Findings include:Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, opioid abuse, anxiety disorder, borderline and personality disorder. A nursing note dated July 12, 2025 at 10:45 AM signed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/staff #7) revealed that Resident #89 became upset, asking the nurse to do something to calm down Resident #81, because he was upset talking to himself, and when Resident #69 approached Resident #81 he cursed. The nurse wrote that she asked Resident #69 not to disturb Resident #81, but Resident #69 kept going back and forth from her room to the hallway looking at Resident #81. The nurse's note continued relaying that Resident #81 started putting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of verbal abuse and neglect, for one resident (#4), was reported to the State Survey Agency within the required timeframe. Findings include: Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including spinal stenosis-lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, hyperlipidemia, left foot drop, anxiety disorder, hypertension and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer and inflammation of bilateral lower extremities. A review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated February 28, 2025 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 14 indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS further revealed that the resident had noted behavioral symptoms toward others 1-3 days a week and exhibited rejection of care 1-3 days a week. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident had an impaired coping mood disorder manifested by foul and abusive language to and about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that behaviors were monitored and documented prior to medication administration for 2 out of 3 residents sampled (#1, #2). The deficient practice could result in residents being over-medicated. Findings include: -Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, cerebral infarction without residual effects, major depressive disorder-recurrent, unspecified psychosis, hallucinations, cognitive communication deficit. A review of the MDS (minimum data set) dated August 8, 2024 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 06 indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of the physician orders revealed the following orders: Paroxetine HCI 10mg , 1.5 tablets by mouth once a day for antidepressant; Risperidone 0.5mg 1 tablet two times a day for psychotic disorder-delusions, paranoia, hallucinations. A review of the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one residents (#2) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The sample size was 3. This deficient practice could lead to residents not reciving the required care. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on December 9, 2024 with diagnosis including a wedge compression fracture of the first lumbar vertebra, unspecified fall, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and interventions included: administer medications as ordered, monitor for potential side effects, ensure call light is within reach and respond promptly, and ensure resident is wearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, facility documents and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This deficient practice could result in psychosocial harm and further instances of abuse. Findings include: Resident #114 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and Bipolar Disorder. A 5 day MDS dated [DATE] included that this resident was moderately cognitively impaired with fluctuations of altered level of conscious, disorganized thinking and inattention. This resident requires partial/moderate assistance with lower body dressing and was independent with mobility. A care plan dated September 18, 2024 included that the resident had behavior concerns wandering into other resident rooms, and hoarding other resident's items/food related to dementia with an intervention to anticipate and meet the residents needs. A care plan included that the resident is on frequent checks for safety/wandering and includes an intervention on October 11, 2024 of safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#1) and (#2) were free from physical abuse. The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include: -Regarding resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including alcohol-induced persisting amnestic disorder, Wernicke's encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, cognitive communication deficit osteomyelitis and major depressive disorder-recurrent. A review of the care plan revealed a focus area indicating that the resident has a potential risk for alteration in mood state and psychological well-being with interventions including encouraging alternative communication, admission to a secure unit, documentation of all behaviors and monitoring of interactions and the presence of negative thoughts and feelings. The care plan further revealed a focus area of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policies the facility failed to ensure an avoidable elopement was prevented. The deficient practice could result in residents finding themselves in unsafe situations in the community, unsupervised. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, schizoaffective disorder and aphasia. A review of the facility's assessment called Wander Risk Scale, completed on July 10, 2024, indicated resident #1 was a low risk for wandering/elopement. A review of the resident's electronic health record (EHR) revealed no other Wander Risk Scale assessment being completed during resident #1's stay. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #1 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. As a result, staff assessed his cognitive skills for daily decision making as modified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident council minutes, resident and staff interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility was unable to demonstrate that resident council meetings were held regularly and that their response and rationale to grievances and recommendations voiced during resident council meetings were addressed. The facility census was 154. The deficient practice could result in residents' concerns, views, grievances or recommendations not being considered or acted upon by facility staff. Findings include: A review of the resident council minutes for the past 6 months, revealed no evidence of written documentation of feedback provided to residents regarding issues brought forth during resident council. A review of the grievance log revealed no evidence of written documentation that grievances had been addressed. The log denotes an open date but not a closed date. The grievance log provided by the director of social services, staff #8, revealed no evidence of any grievances logged prior to August 15, 2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that meals were provided to residents seated together at the same time. This practice could result in compromised dignity for the residents and a decrease of mental health. Findings include: An observation was conducted on 11/01/23 at 12:30 PM of the downstairs B hall dining room of residents seated at tables with drinks. A food cart was brought to dining room, and trays are passed to residents as they are encountered on the cart without regard to the residents seating arrangements. A corner table seating 2 residents are served first and second to last, and all other tables are provided food in a similar manner. An interview was conducted on 11/02/23 at 2:01 PM with the Food Service Director (staff #81) who said that staff are supposed to serve all persons at the table at the same time and that they did not do so. An interview was conducted on 11/02/23 at 3:26 PM with the Administrator (staff #150) who said that staff should be serving tables all at once, not sporadically, and that residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical review, staff interviews and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#401) was informed of their rights during their stay at the facility. The deficient practice could result in residents not understanding their rights and being able to advocate for themselves. Findings include: Resident was admitted on [DATE] with a fracture of the left patella. During the resident interview, #401 stated that she was curious about her rights as a resident. When asked if she was provided a copy of here resident rights, she replied no. An interview was conducted on November 2, 2023 at 03:22 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN staff #44). He stated when a new resident is admitted , the nurse reviews an admission packet with the resident, and has them sign the documents in the packet. Once signature is completed, the documents go to medical records for scanning into the electronic medical record. A review of the admission packet did not reveal a copy of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one was resident (51) was not physically abused by another resident (154). Findings include: Resident #51 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, and encephalopathy. Her orders included mirtazapine and trazadone to treat her depression, and donezepil and Depakote to manage dementia and behaviors. In a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment done on 01/26/2023 that recorded data from a 7 day look back period, Resident #51 scored an 8 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status which suggested moderate cognitive impairment. She did not display any behaviors such as aggression or wandering in the look back period. In her Care plan initiated in August 2023, Resident #51 has goals related to her disorientation and social skills with interventions that included orientating her to her environment and helping increase her comfort level and awareness. In a nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1. Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a referral for a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level II determination was obtained timely for two residents (#56 and #38). The deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving the appropriate level of services. Findings include: Resident #56 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis including schizoaffective disorder, unspecified bipolar disorder and epilepsy. A review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated October 18, 2023 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 13, indicating the that the resident is cognitively intact. The same MDS revealed, under section I, active diagnosis including seizure disorder or epilepsy, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. An interview was conducted on November 2, 2023 at 3:35 PM with the Director of Social Services, staff #8. Staff #8 stated that resident #56 did require a level II PASARR review and that he had sent the PASARR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#114) or resident's representative was able to participate in the care planning process. The sample size was 31. The deficient practice could result in residents and representatives not participating in and understanding their plan of care. Findings include: Resident #114 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including peripheral vascular disease, morbid obesity, gout, difficulty walking, weakness, hypothyroidism and hypertension. A review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated October 3, 2023 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15, indicating that the resident is cognitively intact. A review of the progress notes in the resident's electronic health record did not reveal evidence of the resident's participation in the care plan conference. A review of the IDT (interdisciplinary care conference) summary did not reveal evidence of the resident's participation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and policy, observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that at least one medication was not administered as ordered for three residents # 448, # 38, and # 99 out of five residents observed. The deficient practice of incorrect medication administration does not align with accepted professional standards of practice and may result in undesirable medication-induced harm due to residents receiving medications that were not ordered or incorrect doses of prescribed medications. Findings include: 1) Resident # 448 admitted into the facility on October 30, 2023 with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2) with Hyperglycemia, Hypothyroidism, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension, had a medication order of Insulin Detemir: Insulin Detemir Subcutaneous Solution 100 unit/ml (Insulin Detemir) Inject 65 unit subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime for DM2. On November 2, 2023 at 7:46 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff # 44) on the 2nd floor A wing. Staff # 44 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and the job description, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. Findings include: A review of the personnel file for the Activity Director (staff #80), revealed she was hired for the Activities Director position on February 28, 2023. Further review of the file did not reveal any evidence staff #80 had the qualifications for the position. An interview was conducted on November 2, 2023 at 01:30 PM, with the Director of Human Resources, (staff #58). She stated staff #80 transferred from another facility in Utah that is also a Sandstone property. At the time of her transfer, she did not have the training course for Activity Directors and the owners and Administrator (staff #63) knew that . The intention was to have staff #80 complete the training course at some point. However, as of now, there has not been any further discussion about it. She did state she will be following up on this. Review of the job description for the Activity Director revealed, the Activity Director provides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and policy, observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the environment for Resident # 58 remained free of accident hazards existing from medications at bedside and a potential risk of medication self-administration. The deficient practice of medication at bedside may result in undesirable medication-induced harm. Findings include: Resident # 58 was admitted initially into the facility on October 05, 2021 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Gram-negative Sepsis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Major Depressive Disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment of Resident #58 dated October 29, 2023 reveals a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating the resident is cognitively intact. Review of medical records reveals no evidence of any medication self-administration assessment, request, or approval order by IDT (interdisciplinary team) for Resident # 58. Room observation of Resident # 58 was conducted twice on October 30, 2023 at 9:03…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was below 5% after 3 medication errors were observed during a combined 27 randomly selected medication administration opportunities by four licensed nurses for residents # 448, # 38, # 99. The facility's medication error rate was 11.11% as a result of three of four licensed nurses having at least one medication administration error upon individual observation. The deficient practice of medication errors at or exceeding 5% may result in undesirable medication-induced harm. Findings include: 1. Resident # 448 admitted into the facility on October 30, 2023 with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM 2) with Hyperglycemia, Hypothyroidism, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension, had a medication order of Insulin Determine: There was an order for Insulin Determine Subcutaneous Solution 100 unit/ml (Insulin Determine) Inject 65 unit subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime for DM 2. On November 2, 2023 at 7:46 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that expired medications and devices were not readily accessible for use in the medication supply room and medication cart according to professional standards. The deficient practice may result in the use of expired supplies against manufacturer recommendation resulting in undesirable harm or alterations in effectiveness of medications and devices. Findings include: During a medication storage observation conducted on November 2, 2023 at 7:46 AM with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff # 44), a random inspection of expiration dates was performed of supplies stored in the 2nd floor medication storage supply room. Upon close inspection of enteral feeding supplies, 13 tube feeds tubing entraflo H2O safety spike connectors 1000 ml water bag pump sets were found to be expired. The expiration date on the 13 devices was written as July 28, 2023 on the outside of each of the sealed plastic bags. Staff # 44 confirmed expiration dates on the 13 tube feeds confirming that they were expired and all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, a food test tray, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was provided that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature. The deficient practice has the potential for residents who disliked a meal to experience nutritional problems or dissatisfaction with their meals. Findings include: Review of resident council meeting minutes found 3 of 4 months included food complaints. An interview was conducted on 10/30/23 at 2:57 PM with the ombudsman who said that food had been brought up on several occasions as a concern. An interview was conducted on 10/30/23 at 10:27 AM with resident #95 who said that the food is not hot when it is supposed to be hot. An interview was conducted on 10/31/23 at 8:19 AM with resident #49 who said that the food is not good and often cold. An observation was conducted on 11/01/23 at 12:42 PM of a test tray. The test tray temperatures were taken by staff as follows: - beans 123 F - rice 106 F -taco meat 103 F An interview was conducted on 11/01/23 03:25 PM with resident #77 who said that the taco meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that a unit refrigerator was maintained to ensure food items were dated, expired foods were not available for consumption, and that foods were distributed in a manner to prevent illness. Findings include: An observation was conducted on 11/01/23 at 12:54 PM of an uncovered cart loaded with uncovered cakes brought from the kitchen and into a downstairs B hall dining room. Some trays were not served in the dining room and drinks including coffee and juice were added to the remaining trays. The drinks and cakes were not covered and were pushed down B hall, past COVID-19 isolation rooms before being served to the residents. An observation was conducted on 11/01/23 at 3:14 PM of a upstairs resident refrigerator/ freezer. A notice was posted on the outside of the refrigerator/ freezer to please make sure items are clearly marked with the resident's name, room number and date. The inside of the refrigerator door was marked with a brown spatter. This refrigerator included a fruit plate dated 10/31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure three residents (#s 10, 42, and 44) with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness were referred to the appropriate state-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority for review. The sample size was 8. The deficient practice could result in necessary specialized services not being provided for residents who need it. Findings include: -Resident #10 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, major depressive disorder, and dysphagia. Review of the clinical record revealed a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 was completed on May 25, 2022 with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, and a PASRR Level 2 completed. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence that the facility received notification of a Level 2 review and recommendation. Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence of psychiatric evaluation /treatment from admission to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-15 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff and family interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan within the required timeframe and provide a summary of that baseline care plan to residents (#s 405, 506, and 510) and their representatives. The sample size was 31. The deficient practice could result in residents not having a plan of care and not being aware of their plan of care. Findings include: -Resident #506 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of rectal abscess, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and acquired absence of left leg above knee. Review of the clinical record did not reveal a baseline care plan. Review of a care plan initiated on July 11, 2022 revealed that it consisted of 1 focus for nutrition/hydration. However, this care plan did not include infection, the resident's requirements for assistance, wound care, pain or any other required elements other than nutrition/hydration. A Social Services note dated July 11, 2022 revealed the writer called the resident's spouse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record review, facility documents, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that bathing assistance was provided for three residents (#s 38, 510, and 132). The sample size was 9. The deficient practice could result in residents' hygiene needs not being met. Findings include: -Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus and anxiety disorder. This resident was out of the facility from May 19, 2022 to May 26, 2022. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Lookback Reports for May 2022 revealed this resident received bathing assistance on May 4, 2022. However, no other showers were recorded for May 2022. Review of the shower sheets for May 2022 indicated this resident had 1 shower on May 4, 2022. No other showers were recorded for May, 2022. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of staff to resident abuse was reported to the State agency within the required 2-hour timeframe for one resident (#19). The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being reported. Findings include: Resident #19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of an admission 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 4 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required supervision to extensive 1-person physical assistance for most activities of daily living. On 09/12/22 at 2:02 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with the resident's family member/representative. The representative stated that he had been talking to the resident on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#81) had a level I PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review), upon admission. The sample size was 8. The deficient practice could result in necessary specialized services not being provided for residents who need it. Findings include: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility April 6, 2022 with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, current episode depression (mild to moderate severity), adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, anxiety disorder, and recurrent major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident's cognitive status was intact. The active diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression (other than bipolar), and bipolar disorder. However, further clinical record review revealed no evidence of a PASRR (Medicaid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#19) comprehensive care plan included diabetes management and related insulin use. The sample size was 31. The deficient practice may result in an incomplete plan of care for residents. Findings include: Resident #19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with hyperglycemia, and unspecified protein calorie malnutrition. Review of physician orders included: -pioglitazone HCl (thiazolidinedione) 30 milligrams (mg); give 1 tablet one time a day for DM. Order dated 05/25/22. -Metformin (biguanide) HCl tablet 500 mg; give 500 mg two times a day for DM. Order dated 06/03/2022. The admission 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 4 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident required supervision to extensive assistance with most activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure services provided to one resident (#16) met professional standards of quality care. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving services that do not meet standards of quality. Findings include: Resident #16 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, seizures, encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, cerebral cryptococcosis and disorder of the brain. Review of the physician order summary report (order date range: June 2, 2022 - September 30, 2022) revealed: -Enteral feed order two times a day Osmolite 1.5 at 60 ml (milliliter)/hour x 20 hours/day per peg via pump (off at 10:00 AM and on at 2:00 PM). -Turn off feeding at 10:00 AM, turn back on at 2:00 PM every day shift. -Enteral feed order every 4 hours, flush the peg tube with 100 ml of water. -Vancomycin HCL Solution 500 mg (milligram)/100 ml, use 500 mg intravenously every 12 hours for bacteremia for 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one sampled resident (#38) was provided care in accordance with professional standards of care regarding an ultrasound. The deficient practice could result in delayed treatment for residents. Findings include: Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus and anxiety disorder. This resident was out of the facility from May 19, 2022 to May 26, 2022. A nurse's note dated May 14, 2022 included the resident had a swollen right foot and the writer assessed it. The note also included the resident's feet were elevated and the provider would be notified. A physician's order dated May 14, 2022 included venous ultrasound of the right foot STAT for edema. A nurse's note dated May 19, 2022 revealed the writer called the mobile diagnostic company on May 14, 2022 to order the STAT venous ultrasound order and the company said the soonest the ultrasound would be done was Monday, May 16, 2022.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#16) received care and treatments consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevention of pressure ulcers. The sample size was 4. The deficient practice could result in delayed healing of pressure ulcers. Findings include: Resident #16 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, seizures, encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, cerebral cryptococcosis and disorder of the brain. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The assessment also revealed the resident required extensive assistance of two-person physical assistance for bed mobility, and was admitted with three deep tissue injuries. Review of the census report revealed the resident had been discharged on July 28, 2022 and re-admitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#205) with extensive behavioral health needs was transferred or discharged due to her welfare, and/or her needs could not be met in the facility, and/or the safety of individuals in the facility were being endangered due to the clinical/behavioral needs of the resident. Findings include: Resident #205 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 02/16/17 was identified in the clinical record. A behavioral care plan revised on 04/02/21 related to a history of refusing care, being combative with care, making false accusations, non-compliance in care and treatments, obsession and delusions regarding time and tasks, and verbal aggression. A nursing note dated 04/20/21 at 3:04 p.m. included that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacy Medication Regimen Review for one resident (#81). The sample size was 5. The deficient practice could result in MRRs not being followed through. Findings include: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility April 6, 2022 with diagnoses that included diabetes type 2, essential (primary) hypertension, and heart failure. Regarding heparin Review of the physician orders dated April 6, 2022, revealed an order for Heparin Sodium Solution 5000 unit/milliliter, inject 5000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours for clotting prevention. Review of a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated the resident's cognitive status was intact. The active diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The MDS assessment revealed the resident received 7 days of injections and anticoagulant medication during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#125) was consistently served food that accommodated the resident's food allergies. The sample size was 9. The deficient practice increases the risk for food-related allergic reactions. Findings include: Resident #125 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity due to excess calories, necrotizing fasciitis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Review of the resident Medical Diagnosis profile indicated the resident food allergies included fish, peaches, and seafood. A nutrition/hydration care plan revised on 09/14/22 related to morbid obesity had a goal for the resident to maintain adequate nutritional status. Interventions included providing and serving diet as ordered. On 09/15/22 at 12:24 p.m., an observation of the resident was conducted. The resident was in the process of sending the meal tray back to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility policy, and review of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations, the facility failed to designate a qualified individual as the Infection Preventionist (IP) on an ongoing basis. The deficient practice could result in improper infection prevention practices within the facility. Findings include: During an interview conducted on September 14, 2022 at 2:30 PM with the interim Director of Nursing (DON/staff #141), the DON stated the previous DON last day of employment at the facility was on June 10, 2022. The DON further stated that the facility did not have Infection Preventionist (IP) coverage until August 25, 2022. She also stated that there was no one else in the facility that had been trained as an IP. She stated that she knew that this did not meet the requirements. The DON stated that she has been covering as IP since August 25, 2022. Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention, revealed the infection prevention and control (IPC) program is coordinated and overseen by an infection prevention specialist (Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolated
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents, their representatives and families were notified of positive COVID-19 cases occurring in the facility, within the required timeframe. The deficient practice could result in residents and their representatives/families not being aware of new COVID-19 cases in the facility and the actions implemented to reduce the risk of transmission. Findings include: Review of the facility Line Listing revealed evidence of two staff members (#61 and #51) that had positive COVID-19 tests: -Staff #61 had a positive COVID test result on August 26, 2022 with signs/symptoms that included congestion, runny nose. -Staff #51 had a positive COVID test result on August 28, 2022 with symptoms that included fever, cough, headache, congestion, and runny nose. Further review of the facility website for COVID-19 Reporting revealed evidence that the website had been updated on September 1, 2022, and prior to that, notification was on August 25, 2022. Further review of the website…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement their policy to ensure that contracted staff were vaccinated for COVID-19. The deficient practice may result in other staff not being vaccinated for COVID-19. Findings include: A request was made on September 13, 2022 upon entrance to the facility, for the COVID-19 vaccination status records for contract staff that enter the facility. Further request for the list of vaccination status records for contract staff on September 14, 2022 at 2:33 PM was not provided. An interview was conducted with the interim Director of Nursing (DON/staff #141) on September 14, 2022 at 2:30 PM, who stated that they do not have a list of the vaccination status of contract staff that enter the facility. She also stated that they do not have a way to track or ensure vaccination status for contracted staff. The DON stated that she was aware this requirement was issued at the beginning of 2022. Review of the facility policy titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Vaccination of Staff, revealed that all staff are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide evidence that 1 out of 10 sampled staff (#143) received training regarding abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, and dementia management. The deficient practice could result in staff not being educated regarding abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, and dementia management. Findings include: Staff #143 was hired on 02/2022 as a Registered Nurse (RN) through a contracted agency. Review of staff #143's personnel file revealed no evidence that she had completed training during orientation, which included training on abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or dementia management. On 09/15/22 at 11:23 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Human Resources (staff #82). She stated the competencies that are required on a yearly basis included skills, abuse, resident rights, and dementia care for staff that work in direct care positions such as Certified Nursing Assistants, nurses, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$43,134 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $22,204 — penalty dated 2026-04-03
  • $20,930 — penalty dated 2025-04-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SANDSTONE HEALTHCARE GROUP — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NICHO FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 11/01/2021
SUNNY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 11/01/2021
WHITTE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 11/01/2021
COHEN, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
MEYSTEL, MEIRIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
RICHARDSON, CELINAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
BEJAR, NISSIMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
COHEN, ELLIOTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
SPECTOR, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
SANDSTONE HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2025
IRWIN, CHRISTIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
SHIR, AHMADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
TUROFSKY, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
WILHELM, NAFTALIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
BERKOWITZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/16/2025
MEYSTEL, YOSEFIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2025
CURIS SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense8% of expenses

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$361per resident / day
operating cost
$10,983per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$391per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arizona
$8,365/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,437/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,250/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035099. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next