No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunset Ridge Post Acute

5650 South Rainbow Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89118 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (702) 470-1102 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5555 Redwood St
Pharmacy
5625 S Rainbow Blvd · (702) 457-2100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5940 S Rainbow Blvd · (702) 816-6489 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Sean's Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5555 Redwood St · (702) 547-5433

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%12.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight15.0%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.6%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.2%5.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.0%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.5%13.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.5%22.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.8%89.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers15.2%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.2%15.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.0%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.7%80.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.1%23.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.9%9.6%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.73U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.1%CMS range 37.9–61.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.5–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.4%CMS range 6.0–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.26
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.29
RN hoursweekends
50.6%
Total nursing turnover
51.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 148.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.26 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.25 to 1.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-22)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-15 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comply or establish compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, specifically concerning:(1) not being properly permitted for construction/electrical change activities within the building with the local building department;(2) not completing the change of ownership license application with the State Survey Agency;(3) by not completing the change of ownership license application with the State Survey Agency, the facility has prevented their Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS) certification change of ownership from proceeding to completion; and(4) not timely notifying the State Survey Agency with all Administrator changes at this facility. Findings include: On [DATE] the census was 147 out of 160 licensed beds. A subsequent site visit on [DATE] the census was 128 out of 160 licensed beds. The facility failed to:1) Obtain the proper local building department permit related to the electrical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable room temperature for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to cause discomfort, dehydration, heat-related illness, and reduce the quality of life for the residents. Findings include: On 05/15/2026 at approximately 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM, observations and temperature measurements were conducted on the first-floor resident rooms located within the Lake [NAME] and Mt. [NAME] residential hallways. Room temperature measurements were obtained using a battery-operated temperature gun. Temperatures were taken along the forward-facing wall directly in front of the resident's bed in each room. Great care was taken to avoid obtaining temperature readings from windows, exterior walls exposed to direct sunlight, reflective surfaces, or other heat-producing sources in order to maintain a consistent and reliable method for assessing room temperatures. The observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to maintain professional boundaries and protect a resident from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience emotional and physical harm.Findings include:Resident 1 (R1) was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/13/2026 with diagnoses of quadriplegia, immunodeficiencies, protein-calorie malnutrition, and difficulty walking.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating R1 was cognitively intact.A nurse's progress note dated 01/16/2026, documenting events from 01/15/2026, indicated R1 went to the Director of Nursing's (DON) office with the Director of Staff Development and a certified nursing assistant (CNA) present. R1 expressed concerns regarding an argument with CNA1. R1 reported becoming frustrated due to waiting times and began yelling and using foul language toward CNA1. CNA1 responded in a similar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure fingernail care was provided for 4 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 10, 13, 12 and 9). The deficient practice had the potential for residents not to receive nail care. Findings include:1) Resident 10 (R10) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and dependence on a respirator.On 08/19/2025 at 10:51 AM, R10 was observed lying in bed and noted to have bilateral hand contractures. The fingernails on both hands were approximately more than a quarter of an inch long. Two wound care nurses confirmed the long fingernails. The two wound care nurses indicated certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were responsible for providing fingernail care. 2) Resident 13 (R13) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and tracheostomy.On 08/19/2025 at 11:33 AM, R13 was observed lying in bed and noted to have bilateral hand contractures. The fingernails on both hands were approximately more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for Pressure Relief Ankle Foot Orthosis (PROFO - a specialized medical device used to relieve pressure and support the ankle and foot) boots were implemented as ordered for 2 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 10 and 9). The deficient practice had the potential for not limiting the progression of contractures of limited mobility residents and heel protection. Findings include: 1) Resident 10 (R10) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and dependence on a respirator.2) Resident 9 (R9) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage and dependence on a respirator.A review of the medical record for R10 and R9 revealed a physician order dated 08/13/2025, for the residents to wear bilateral lower extremity (BLE) PRAFO boots as needed for contracture management, every shift.On 08/19/2025 at 10:58 AM, observed R10 and R9 were not wearing PRAFO boots. On 08/20/2025 at 3:31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for monthly urinary catheter change was completed for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 12). The deficient practice had the potential for a resident to develop a urinary tract infection.Findings include: Resident 12 (R12) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and infection/inflammation reaction due to other urinary catheter.On 08/19/2025 at 10:15 AM, R12 was observed in bed with a urinary tubing and collection bag hanging on the side of the bed.A Physician Order dated 05/01/2025, documented change indwelling Foley catheter or suprapubic catheter every 30 days on the 1st day of the month. One time a day starting on the 1st and ending on the 1st every month for Foley catheter care/maintenance. May change Foley catheter or suprapubic catheter if not contraindicated.The Comprehensive Care Plan revised 08/07/2025, documented the resident utilized an indwelling catheter and was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was obtained for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC - a long, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded to a large vein in the chest near the heart) line and heparin lock (Heplock - a small, flexible tube inserted into a vein to maintain access for intermittent intravenous (IV) infusions) care, maintenance, and the dressing change per facility standards for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had a potential for placing a resident at risk for IV insertion site infections.Findings Include: Resident 1 (R1) was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and chronic respiratory failure.On 08/19/2025 at 10:00 AM, R1 was observed with two IV lines. A right upper arm IV access with two ports and a left mid arm IV access with one port. The medical record lacked documented evidence that a physician order was obtained for the care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide medication for glaucoma (abnormal high pressure in the eye) as ordered by a physician for 1 of 40 sampled resident (Resident 185). The deficient practice could result in poor control of glaucoma and potential loss of vision. Findings include: The facility policy titled Medications, Provision of Routine or Emergency, indicated the facility provided medications to meet the needs of each resident. The policy indicated that prescribed medications were administered in a timely manner. Resident 185 (R185) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including abscess of the liver. The resident was responsible for self and making medical decisions. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had good memory function. On 08/22/2025, in the morning, R185 verbalized routine home medications included a prescription eye drop to each eye daily at bedtime to control glaucoma. R185 verbalized requesting the facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) enhanced barrier precaution (EBP - a set of infection control practices designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes) was maintained during care for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 1), and 2) provisions in the water management program was implemented. The deficient practice had potential for microbial infection to develop and spread within the facility.Findings Include: 1) Resident 1(R1) was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and pneumonia gram negative bacteria. R1's physician's order dated 08/17/2025, documented Enhance Barrier Precaution: Tracheostomy, ventilator, Gastrostomy tube and indwelling foley catheter. On 08/20/2025 at 4:05 PM, observed a certified nursing aide (CNA) emptying R1's Foley catheter bag with gloves donned. The CNA was not wearing a gown. On 08/20/2025 at 4:18 PM, the CNA indicated a gown should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the air conditioning unit in 2 of 12 resident room halls (1300 Hall and 2300 Hall) was maintained in good working condition. The deficient practice had the potential for the temperature to be at an uncomfortable level. Findings include: The Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 06/10/2025, with ten residents in attendance, documented the residents had complained the air conditioning was not working in the Valley of Fire Unit and Mount [NAME] Unit. There were cooling fans throughout the building, but it did not alleviate the situation.Review of the facility map revealed the Valley of Fire Unit (located on the first floor of the building) consisted of resident rooms in 1100 Hall, 1200 Hall, and 1300 Hall. Mount [NAME] Unit (located on the second floor of the building) had the residents' rooms in 2100 Hall, 2200 Hall, and 2300 Hall.On 08/21/2025 at 12:15 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed in June 2025 the air…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident was kept safe from abuse for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident to experience emotional distress and physical harm. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, and heart failure. The facility reported incident (FRI) dated 02/03/2024 documented the following: -On 02/01/2025 in the PM, R1 reported to the Nurse that on Saturday 2/1/2025, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) took R1's room phone away because the resident kept calling the desk. - Employee 1 (E1) was interviewed and admitted to taking the phone away from the resident because the resident had kept calling the front desk. -Conclusion: The allegation of abuse by E1 against R1 was substantiated. The facility investigation documented R1 was upset with E1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure abuse policies and procedures were implemented for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to put residents at risk of physical or psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, and heart failure. The facility reported incident (FRI) dated 02/03/2024 documented the following: -On 02/01/2025 in the PM, R1 reported to the nurse that on Saturday 2/1/2025, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) took the resident's room phone away because the resident kept calling the desk. - Employee 1 (E1) was interviewed and admitted to taking the phone away from the resident because the resident had kept calling the front desk. The facility investigation documented the allegation of abuse by E1 against R1 was substantiated. The investigation also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect by facility staff directing the resident to urinate in their incontinence brief for 1 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, and congestive heart failure. On 01/07/2025 at 9:22 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verbalized the staff are not supposed to tell incontinent residents to go to the bathroom in their briefs, however it does occur. On 01/07/2025 at 9:32 AM, Resident 5 (R5) verbalized having been told to urinate on themselves in the past. R5 verbalized feeling upset about it and has heard other residents have been told the same but cannot speak for them. On 01/07/2025 at 3:52 PM, R3 verbalized one CNA on the night shift told the resident if had to wait for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to clarify discrepancies in the appeal decision resulting in a resident being discharged and lacked documented evidence of well-coordinated discharge planning for 1 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 4). The deficient practice had the potential for a resident not to receive the necessary skilled therapy to improve functional ability and provide the necessary provisions for continuation of care. Findings include: Resident 4 (R4) R4 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/21/2024 with diagnoses including difficulty in walking, chronic osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, contracture of muscle right lower leg, and limitations of activities due to disability. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 had lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot) functional limitations in range of motion with impairment on both sides. The Physical Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 08/23/2024 documented 100+ degrees flexion contracture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled for 1 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 14). The deficient practice had the potential to increase skin breakdown, infections, odor and bacteria buildup. Findings include: Resident 14 (R14) R14 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of major vascular neurocognitive disorder- dementia. A Therapy to Nursing communication form dated 01/06/2024, documented the resident is front weight bearing with transfer and the resident had an assessed device of a rolling walker. The resident needed supervision for grooming, oral care, upper body dressing and footwear, moderate assistance with toileting, minimal assistance with showering and lower body dressing. The resident is independent with communication, vison and feeding. On 01/07/2025 at 4:50 PM, Director of Medical records provided two shower sheets which documented on 01/08/2024, the resident had a bed bath and on 01/16/2024 the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure two free standing portable oxygen cylinders were safely stored. The deficient practice had the potential to prevent avoidable accidents and increase concerns of potential harm to residents and the facility overall. Findings include: On 01/07/2025 at 8:42 AM in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], two free standing portable oxygen cylinders were left unattended. On 01/07/2025 at 8:45 AM, the resident stated was not sure why the oxygen cylinders are in the resident's room. One oxygen cylinder was empty, and the other cylinder was half full. On 01/07/2025 at 8:45 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) explained was not sure why the oxygen cylinders were inside the room. The CNA confirmed the oxygen cylinders were placed correctly but the oxygen cylinders should be placed in the closet with other oxygen cylinders. The CNA stated was not aware if the oxygen cylinders were empty. On 01/07/2025 at 8:48 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) expressed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #19). This deficient practice had the potential to result in other residents having access to the medication. Findings include: Resident 19 Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, surgery on the digestive system, dehydration, elevated white blood count, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, unspecified, acute kidney failure unspecified, chronic kidney disease stage three unspecified, and acute cholecystitis. On 1/07/2025 at 9:00 AM, a white/pink cream in a medication cup was left on Resident 19's dresser, unattended. On 1/07/2025 at 9:03 AM, the Registered Nurse verbalized the medication cup with the cream medication, should not have been placed and left in the resident's room. On 1/09/2025 at 10:23 AM, the Registered Nurse verbalized Resident #19 had an order for Moisture Barrier cream…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for a breakfast service. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 09/26/2024 at 8:31 PM, breakfast was delivered to residents in the Valley of Fire Unit to include cereal, fruit, pancakes and sausage. The Week At a Glance menu documented breakfast for Thursday would include assorted juice, choice of hot or cold cereal, cheesy eggs, hashbrowns, banana, toast, margarine or jelly, and milk or another beverage. The breakfast for Friday would include assorted juice, choice of hot or cold cereal, pancakes, sausage, fresh fruit cup, margarin or syrup, and milk or another beverage. On 09/26/2024 at 2:18 PM, the Dietary Manager (DM) verbalized breakfast on Thursday 09/26/2024 was swapped with the breakfast for Friday 09/27/2024 because the cook looked at the wrong day on the menu and began preparing for the breakfast for Friday instead of the breakfast for Thursday. The DM verbalized residents would be notified of this change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a dietary aide's purse was not being stored with resident food in the dry storage area of the kitchen, 2) a hairnet was donned prior to entering the kitchen, 3) hand washing was performed when entering the kitchen or prior to donning gloves, 4) beverages were covered when traveling down hallways, 5) food was stored at safe temperatures, and 6) thermometers were properly sanitized between foods during the taking of temperatures. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for food-borne infectious illnesses. Findings include: 1. Storage of personal items: On 09/23/2024 at 12:56 PM, located on a shelf containing food for residents, was a staff members purse. On 09/23/2024 at 1:00 PM, the Dietary Aid confirmed the purse belonged to them and verbalized the Dietary Manager had previously spoke to the Dietary Aid on a few occasions about leaving the Dietary Aid's purse next to resident food. The Dietary Aid explained the purse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 4 dining rooms maintained a comfortable home-like environment by storing medical equipment in the dining areas. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who wish to eat in the dining areas. Findings include: On 09/24/2024 at 7:54 AM, in the Lake [NAME] dining room, the following medical equipment was being stored: -One hoyer lift, -One vitals sign monitor, and; -One wheelchair scale. On 09/24/2024 at 8:06 AM, there was a resident eating breakfast in the Lake [NAME] dining room. The resident explained the medical equipment was always in the dining area, however, did not know how long the equipment had been there. On 09/24/2024 at 8:11 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) explained the medical equipment was supposed to be put away in the cubbies, located in each hallway, however staff would put the equipment in the dining area after use. The CNA confirmed the medical equipment was stored in the dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) expired medications were removed from 1 of 5 inspected medication carts and 1 of 2 inspected medication storage rooms, 2) an unsealed medication was removed from 1 of 5 inspected medication carts, and 3) discontinued medications were removed from 1 of 5 inspected medication carts. This deficient practice has the potential to place residents at risk of receiving medications that were no longer at a safe level of efficacy. Findings include: Expired Medication On 09/24/2024 at 2:35 PM, during an inspection of the medication room on the Valley of Fire unit in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1, the following items were found: -Three intravenous (IV) solution bags containing Pantoprazole 40 milligrams (mg) in 100 milliliters (ml) of Normal Saline (NS). The use by date on the three IV solution bags was 09/06/2024. The IV solution bags were hanging on the wall of the medication room, with current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed both orally and in writing prior to or upon admission of the rules related to leaving on pass. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the entire facility population of 129 residents. Findings include: Resident # 347 Resident #347 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue. On 09/23/2024 at 3:09 PM, Resident #347 verbalized the resident was unable to leave the premises. In the past, when Resident #347 wanted to go across the street for food or to the grocery store, Resident #347 was told by facility staff if the resident left, the facility would kick the resident out. Resident #347 verbalized being in the facility felt like being in a prison. On 09/24/2024 at 2:34 PM, during a resident council interview, 5 of 5 residents reported wanting to leave the premises…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident or resident representative was provided information about the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #84). The deficient practice has the potential to deprive residents of their right for self-determination. Findings Include: Resident #84 Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and severe persistent asthma with acute exacerbation. Resident #84's clinical record lacked documented evidence of an advance directive or information provided to the resident or the resident's representative about the right to formulate an advanced directive. On 09/26/2024 at 7:28 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility had not determined if Resident #84 had an advanced directive or if the resident or the resident's representative was provided information to formulate one. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for 1) a resident receiving hospice services (Resident #57), 2) a resident dependent on a respirator (Resident #69), and 3) a resident with anxiety (Resident #15) for 3 of 29 sampled residents. This deficient practice has the potential to deprive residents of receiving appropriate care. Findings include: Resident #57 Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to a known physiological condition, cognitive communication deficit and depression, unspecified. On 09/24/2024 at 7:57 AM, Resident #57 verbalized being confused as to what care was being provided in the facility and could not verbalize if the resident was receiving hospice services. A physician's order dated 09/18/2024, documented admit to hospice on 09/18/2024. Resident #57's clinical record lacked documented evidence of a care plan for hospice. On 09/26/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to meet professional standards of medication administration and ensure medications were not left, unsecured, at a resident's bedside for 1 of 4 residents observed for medication administration (Resident #82). The deficient practice placed the patient at risk for not receiving needed medication. Findings include: Resident #82 Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including other acute osteomyelitis, left ankle and foot and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. On 09/26/2024 at 9:04 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) began preparing medications for Resident #82. Included in the prepared medications was ClearLax 17 grams (gm), mixed in water, in a clear plastic cup. On 09/24/2024 at 9:17 AM, the LPN entered Resident #82's room and placed the resident's medications on the bedside table. The LPN stood at the resident's bedside while the resident took the oral tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a code status of do not resuscitate (DNR) was not documented as full code in the electronic health record for 4 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #57, #75, #40, and #347). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident with DNR status being given life-saving measures during an emergent event. Findings include: Resident #57 Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to a known physiological condition, cognitive communication deficit and depression, unspecified. Resident #57's electronic chart documented the resident was a full code and was to receive cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in an emergent event. Resident #57's Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated [DATE], documented the resident was on comfort-focused treatment and was a DNR. Resident #75 Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an ordered therapeutic diet was on the resident meal card and provided to 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #89). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for not receiving an appropriate diet to maintain nutritional needs. Findings include: Resident #89 Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus without complications. A physician order dated 08/06/2024, documented heart healthy consistent carbohydrate (CCHO) diet regular texture regular consistency. Resident #89's care plan included an intervention revised 08/18/2024, documenting prescribed diet was heart healthy CCHO diet. On 09/24/2024 at 10:19 AM, Resident #89 verbalized Resident #89 was diabetic. The facility served a lot of carbohydrates that did not taste very good, so Resident #89's family often brought meals Resident #89 liked better. The Week At a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to obtain Dialysis Communications forms for a resident receiving hemodialysis for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #198). This deficient practice potentially places residents at risk for not receiving continuity of care. Findings include: Resident #198 Resident #198 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, other specified abnormal findings of blood chemistry, and heart failure, unspecified. A physician's order dated 09/22/2024, documented hemodialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Resident #198's Care Plan initiated on 09/24/2024, documented the resident required renal dialysis related to renal failure and was to receive dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Resident #198's clinical record lacked documented evidence dialysis communication forms were being sent with the resident to dialysis and obtained in the medical record. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to discontinue a medication after receiving an order to discontinue the medication for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #4). This deficient practice resulted in the resident receiving an unnecessary medication. Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified. An Order Summary Report for Resident #4, dated 09/26/2024, documented the following: -Oxybutynin Chloride oral tablet, give one tablet by mouth BID for overactive bladder. The order date was 09/17/2024, with a start date of 09/18/2024. -Tolterodine Tartrate (Detrol) two mg tablets, give one tablet by mouth BID for urinary frequency, urgency, and incontinence. The order date was 09/17/2024, the start date was 09/18/2024. The September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication's side effects were monitored, a psychotropic medication's related behaviors were monitored, and an as needed psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #15). This deficient practice placed residents at risk for not receiving appropriate medications for their overall health status. Findings include: Resident #15 Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of anxiety disorder unspecified. A consent for psychotropic medication dated 08/13/2024, documented Hydroxyzine 25 mg with an expected duration of 14 days. An active physician's order dated 08/13/2024, documented Hydroxyzine Pamoate capsule 25 milligrams(mg). Give one tablet via gastronomy tube every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. Resident #15's physician orders lacked evidence of side effect monitoring or behavior monitoring for Hydroxyzine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with an error rate of less than 5 percent (%). There were 31 opportunities and 6 medication errors. The medication error rate was 19.35%. Findings include: Resident #48 Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and other seizures. On 09/25/2024 at 7:47 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) explained medications were required to be administered within one hour before and one hour after the scheduled administration time on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). On 09/25/2024 at 10:13 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) began preparing to administer medications to Resident #48. Among the medications prepared were the following: -Cholecalciferol D3 1000 units, two tablets were placed in a medication cup. -Docusate Sodium 100 milligrams (mg), one tablet was placed in a medication cup.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #80). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident not receiving appropriate care and/or medications. Findings include: Resident #80 Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, unspecified, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites. Resident #80's weight record documented the following: -04/01/2024: used a sitting scale -04/08/2024: used a sitting scale -04/16/2024: used a sitting scale -04/23/2024: used a sitting scale -04/29/2024: used a sitting scale -05/06/2024: used a sitting scale -06/04/2024: used a sitting scale -07/03/2024: used a sitting scale -07/10/2024: used a sitting scale -07/12/2024: used weights taken during dialysis -07/18/2024: used weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were in place for a resident with chronic wounds for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #292) and hand hygiene was performed during medication administration for 1 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #82). The deficient practice had the potential for spreading infectious illnesses to all residents. Findings include: Resident #292 Resident #292 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including localized swelling, mass and lump, lower limb, bilateral and chronic venous hypertension (idiopathic) with ulcer. On 09/23/2024 at 2:00 PM, Resident #292 was lying in bed with bilateral lower legs wrapped with elastic bandages. The resident explained the resident was admitted to the facility for care of a wound on the resident's leg. The resident recalled the wound was present for approximately four to five months. Resident #292's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an employee completed training on preventing, identifying, and reporting abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation (abuse training) for 1 of 35 sampled employees (Employee #8). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings Include: Employee #8 Employee #8 with a title of Certified Nursing Assistant and a hire date of 10/17/2023. Employee #8's record lacked documented evidence abuse training had been completed. On 09/25/2024 at 1:19 PM, the Director of Human Resources confirmed Employee #8 was hired on 10/17/2023 and had not completed abuse training since hire. The facility policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Preventing and Prohibiting Abuse, revised 09/13/2022, documented staff would receive training related to the prohibition and prevention, identifying and recognizing, and reporting of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered as prescribed for 1 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to cause a resident to have uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management revised in March 2020, documented interventions were developed to be consistent with the resident's goals and needs and to address the underlying causes of pain. The pain management interventions were required to be consistent with the resident's treatment goals, which were specially defined and documented. Implementing pain management strategies, including non-pharmacological interventions, may be appropriate alone, in conjunction with medications, or prescribed to manage pain. Implement the medication regimen as ordered, carefully documenting the results of the interventions. A facility policy titled Pharmacy Services-Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) the oven was maintained in sanitary conditions, 2) an expired meal product was discarded, 3) open meal products were labeled, 4) nourishment room was maintained in sanitary conditions, and 5) nourishment room food items in the refrigerator were labeled, dated, and expired items were discarded. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents' health by exposing them to potentially hazardous foods. Findings included: 09/20/23 07:50 AM, the following issues were identified during the initial tour to the kitchen: The top surface of the oven was tacky to touch with collection of food debris and dust. The inside of the oven was visibly soiled with golden-brown like grime stains. A food service worker verbalized the oven was cleaned about two months ago and was not sure how often it had to be cleaned. Expired meal products: a 5 pounds (Lbs.) container of peeled garlic expired on 09/16/2023 was found in the walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the views and recommendations of the resident group were acted upon, and the response and rationale were communicated back to the resident group. The failed practice had the potential to affect the quality of life and health status of residents. Findings include: The Resident Right to Organize and Participate in Resident Groups in the Facility policy dated July 2018, documented the facility would consider views of the residents and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of resident group concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility. The facility should be able to demonstrate the facility's response and rationale for the response in relation to expressed grievances and recommendations from the group. On 09/21/23 at 2:15 PM, eight residents attended the resident council meeting. The residents reported food concerns discussed in previous meetings had not been addressed and remained unresolved. Specifically, residents indicated food would sometimes be served late, cold, nasty, did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to securely store medication in the hallway and six resident rooms in 3 of 3 hallways in the Valley of Fire unit. The deficient practice had the potential for residents, visitors, and staff members to gain unauthorized access to medications and for residents to self-administer medication that could interact with facility prescribed medication, which can adversely affect a resident's health. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:22 AM, an intravenous piggyback (Piperacillin and Tazobactam), was unattended on top of a locked medication cart stationed outside of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The staff member was inside resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and the medication cart was not within their sight. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) exited resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and explained the medication was an antibiotic and should not have been left unattended. The medication should have been stored inside the medication cart. The LPN verbalized someone could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to inform a resident of the medical justification for placing the resident on transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 10). The deficient practice led to miscommunication, the lack of residents' knowledge of their care arrangements, and had the potential for psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident 10 (R10) R10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bacteremia (bacteria in the bloodstream). On 09/20/2023 at 10:04 AM, a contact precaution sign was posted outside of R10's door. On 09/21/2023 at 1:15 PM, the contact precaution sign was no longer posted outside of R10's door. On 09/21/2023 at 1:44 PM, R10 explained they noticed the contact precaution sign, labeled with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (type of bacteria that was resistant to several antibiotics), was placed outside of their door on 09/20/2023 and taken off on 09/21/2023. R10 inquired four times with various staff members and have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a process in place to identify and refer residents for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) level two for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 30). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive residents with appropriate behavioral health services. Findings include: The PASARR Screening Coordination policy dated July 2018, documented the facility would refer to the appropriate state-designated authority, any resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition. Resident 30 (R30) R30 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and pneumonia. R30's indicators included not having a PASARR level two with diagnoses. On 09/20/2023 in the morning, R30 was awake in bed with a tracheostomy tube, but was able to verbalize needs. A PASARR level one dated 07/31/2018, revealed R30 had no mental illness, no mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) The medication was available during the medication pass for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 341). 2) The Medication Administration Record (MAR) was not signed off before medication administration for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 341) occurred. These deficient practices had led to a missed medication dose, and the failure to accurately document the medication administration could potentially have resulted in medication errors, falsified medication records, altered therapeutic benefits, medication underdosing or overdosing, and adverse reactions. Findings include: Resident 341 (R341) R341 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy status. 1) A Physician order dated 09/06/2023, documented Folic acid tablet 1 milligram (mg) via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a feeding tube used to deliver nutrition directly to the stomach). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a newly identified pressure ulcer was reported to the physician and treatment orders were obtained and carried out for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident #437). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for wound complications such as infection or worsening of the pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #437 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of the circulatory system, heart failure, and limitation of activities due to disability. A Wound Assessment Details Report dated 04/21/23, documented a facility acquired coccyx wound was identified on 04/21/23. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record the physician was notified of the wound, the care plan was updated, skin assessments were completed, wound care orders were obtained, and the resident was provided treatment for the wound identified on 04/21/23. On 09/21/23 at 2:30 PM, the Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a spray bottle of chemical cleaner, a bottle of wound cleanser, and a portable oxygen cylinder were safely stored. The deficient practice had the potential to prevent avoidable accidents and increase concerns of potential harm to residents and the facility overall. Findings include: On 09/20/2023 at 11:30 AM, a spray bottle of Sani2 chemical cleaner was unattended in a cubby area across from the elevators, at the entry of the Valley of Fire unit. Three residents and a staff member walked past the area. A Maintenance Assistance staff member walked by, confirmed the spray bottle of Sani2 chemical cleaner was unattended and advised the spray bottle of Sani2 chemical cleaner was not safe to leave unattended. On 09/20/2023 at 12:55 PM, in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was a bottle of wound cleanser on top of the dresser drawer. On 09/20/2023 at 12:59 PM, a Unit Manager confirmed the bottle of wound cleanser was inside resident room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for the utilization and size of an indwelling Foley catheter were obtained and transcribed for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 23), and the correct Foley size order was verified and inserted as ordered for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 47). This deficient practice could potentially increase the risk of catheter-related complications, including urinary tract infections, patient discomfort, trauma, and pain. Findings include: Resident 23 (R23) R23 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including urinary tract infection and severe dementia with agitation. A Care plan dated 09/08/2023, documented R23 had altered urinary function, requiring the use of an indwelling Foley catheter for obstructive neuropathy. R23's medical record lacked documented evidence a physician order was obtained for the utilization of the indwelling Foley catheter, including specifying its size. On 09/20/2023 at 11:01…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to complete timely assessments and interventions addressing resident's weight loss and a physician was notified for one of the 31 sampled residents (Resident 47). This deficient practice could have potentially led to a deprivation of essential care and a deterioration in overall health. Findings include: Resident 47 (R47) R47 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dysphagia, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. The Brief Interview of Mental Status dated 08/03/2023, documented a score of 14/15, which indicated R47's cognitive status was intact. On 09/20/2023 at 10:51 AM, R47 indicated was diabetic and had wounds. R47 indicated the diabetic diet had been discussed but was not provided. R47 expressed concerns about significant weight loss, and nobody within the facility had discussed this concern. R47 indicated became aware of the weight loss during a weighing session and had to inquire with the CNA about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 42 (R42) R42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and dysphagia following cerebral infarction. A physician's order dated 07/31/2023, documented Glucerna with Carbsteady 1.2 calories at 85 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour for 20 hours from 6:00 PM to 2:00 PM via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube to provide 1700mL/2040kcal. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (screening measure for cognitive condition) score of 00, which meant R42 was severely impaired. On 09/20/2023 at 11:27 AM, R42 was lying in bed with the head of bed elevated. The tube feed pump was on and running with a formula of Glucerna with Carbsteady 1.2 calories, infusing at 85 cc per hour. A physician's order dated 09/20/2023, documented Glucerna with Carbsteady 1.2 calories at 90 cc per hour for 20 hours from 6:00 PM to 2:00 PM via PEG tube to provide 1800mL/2160kcal. On 09/21/2023 at 9:05 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or midline dressing was changed as scheduled for four sampled residents (Residents 8, 47, 79, and 390). This deficient practice could potentially lead to serious complications, such as bloodstream infections, clot formation, or other adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Resident 8 (R8) R8 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and osteomyelitis of left ankle and foot. The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 09/01/2023, documented a score of 12/15, which indicated R8's cognitive status was intact. On 09/20/2023 at 12:30 PM, R8 lay in bed, verbally alert and oriented. An empty bag of intravenous antibiotics hung at the bedside. R8's left arm had a PICC line inserted; the transparent dressing was soiled and dated 09/07/2023. A Physician order dated 09/03/2023, documented changing the transparent dressing (every Sunday at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure an intravenous antibiotic was administered as scheduled following a physician's order for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 132). The deficient practice had the potential to cause adverse effects related to toxic levels of the medication. Findings include: Resident #132 (R132) R132 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including right mandible abscess and osteomyelitis. On 09/20/2023 at 9:10 AM, R132 stated a nurse administered an intravenous (IV) antibiotic at the wrong time. The resident denied any adverse reaction after the administration. A physician's order dated 09/04/2023, documented Zosyn (piperacillin sodium/tazobactam sodium 3-0.375 grams), intravenously every eight hours for osteomyelitis for 20 days. A physician's order dated 08/31/2023, documented Cubicin (Daptomycin) 600 milligrams (mg) IV (Daptomycin) one time a day for facial cellulitis. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to transport clean linen in a sanitary manner for one unsampled resident and follow their Transmission-Based Precaution (TBP) practice for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 10). The deficient practice had the potential to contaminate clean linen and spread communicable infections or organisms that can affect the well-being of residents. Findings include: On 09/20/2023 at 8:39 AM, a Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) was observed carrying clean folded linen in between their right arm and against their clothing/body down the 1100 hallway into a resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The PTA was observed unfolding and fanning the linen over a resident in the B bed. On 09/20/23 at 8:41 AM, the PTA verbalized it was probably not okay to transport clean linen against their body due to the concern of contamination of the clean linen. The PTA did not know the importance of not fanning linen over a resident after it was transported in such a manner. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SANDSTONE HEALTHCARE GROUP — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NICHO FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF13%since 11/01/2021
SUNNY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF13%since 11/01/2021
WHITTE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF13%since 11/01/2021
COHEN, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
MEYSTEL, MEIRIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
SMITH, DARBEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
BEJAR, NISSIMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
COHEN, ELLIOTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
SPECTOR, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
ATIED ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
CURIS SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
DAVID A BERKOWITZ REVOC TR DAVID BERKOWITZ TTEEOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
MEIR MEYSTEL REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
RAINBOW BLVD PROPERTY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
SANDSTONE HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
YOSEF MEYSTEL DECLARATION OF TR OF YOSEF MEYSTEL TTEEOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
AFTAB, AMIRIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
BEHN, MARCIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
WILHELM, NAFTALIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
BERKOWITZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
MEYSTEL, YOSEFIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$28.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.3M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 32%Medicare 6%Other / private 62%

This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$561per resident / day
operating cost
$17,064per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$524per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295095. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next