Kindred Hospital Brea D/P SNF
875 N Brea Blvd, Brea, CA 92821 · For profit - Corporation · 38 certified beds · (714) 529-6842 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 7.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 29.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.5%CMS range 48.8–74.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.6–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.0–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 38 beds and averages 35.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.18 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.35 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.65 to 2.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary GT care and services for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was positioned safely at 30 to 45 degrees during the GT feeding administration. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for complications related to the GT feeding, including aspiration.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Procedure Administration of Enteral Nutrition dated 1/2026 showed to position the resident with head of the bed (HOB) elevated at least 30 degrees or upright in a chair to prevent aspiration. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 5/29/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report dated 5/29/26, showed a care plan problem (undated) addressing the resident's enteral nutrition orders. The interventions included elevating the HOB 30-45 degrees during the feeding and maintaining this elevation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to comply with State law requirements for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4). * Resident 4's discontinued respiratory orders were not signed by the physician. This failure had the potential to prevent the resident from receiving necessary care and services to meet the resident's assessed needs.Findings: According to the California Code of Regulations Title 22 S72547, the orders of a licensed health care practitioner acting within the scope of his or her professional licensure, including drugs, treatment and diet orders, progress notes, signed and dated on each visit. The orders of a healthcare practitioner acting within the scope of his or her professional licensure shall be correctly recapitulated. Review of the facility's P&P titled Readmission, Handwritten Orders, and Written Transfer Orders dated 10/2022 showed to enter orders into the electronic medical record (EMR). The physician electronically signs the order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure five of five final sampled residents (Residents 1, 7, 13, 22, and 40) reviewed for unnecessary medications were appropriately monitored for the identified manifested episode of behavior and provided with the non pharmacological interventions for the use of psychotropic medications. * Resident 7's medical record did not have documentation of the non pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of the medications, and no monthly summary of behaviors targeted for the use of Seroquel (antipsychotic medication that treats schizophrenia and bipolar disorder), Ativan (anxiety medications), and divalproex (a mood-stabilizing medication) medications.* Resident 13's medical record did not have documentation of the non pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of the medications, and no recent monthly summary of behaviors targeted for the use of clonazepam (an antianxiety medication), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were administered as ordered by the physician, properly accounted for, and destroyed per pharmaceutical protocols. * Resident 7's Ativan (a controlled medication for anxiety) administration log did not match the administration record and the physician's orders. * Resident 7's midodrine (a medication to treat low blood pressure) was administered outside of the ordered parameters.* Resident 13's midodrine was administered outside of the ordered parameters.* The facility failed to ensure medication destruction was completed by two licensed nurses.* Resident 46's controlled medication log did not match the administration record. These failures had the potential for the medications to be administered in error and opportunities for drug diversion or drug misuse, in addition an undesirable outcome from medications not being administered per the physicians' orders.Findings: Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper storage and labeling of medications and biologicals in one of one medication rooms observed (Medication Room A), and two of five medication carts observed (Medication Carts A and B) and at two non-sampled residents bedside (Residents 35 and 41) were followed. * Medication Room A's medication destruction incinerator container was not secured, and the medications were not effectively destroyed. * Two bottles of compounded Vancomycin (medication to treat infections), past their labeled use by date, were in Medication Room A's refrigerator. * RN 7 left Medication Cart B unlocked and unattended.* An open bottle of glucometer test strips in Medication Cart B was not labeled with the date opened and the use-by date. * A bottle of Pro-Stat (liquid protein supplement to aid in wound healing) had a sticky residue, as well as a damaged pharmacy label. * The facility failed to ensure the medication triad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the sanitation in the kitchen was maintained. * There was no thermometer inside the reach in refrigerator,* One box of opened gloves and two boxes of aluminum sheets were stored inside the reach in refrigerator.* Two racks inside the reach in refrigerator had brown discoloration.* Expired items were stored on the kitchen countertop.* Two bottles of expired Ensure were stored inside the residents' refrigerator * One sanitizer bucket was stored near food items.* Food stored in the steam table did not reach the appropriate temperatures.* Temperature log for dish washing machine was not completed for 2 days.* Two staff did not know the location of the emergency food storage. * Three male kitchen staff were observed with their beard restraints placed underneath their moustaches, not fully covering their facial hair.* There was no can opener readily available to open canned food items in dry food/emergency food supply storage room. These failures posed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection prevention control program and practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections. * The facility failed to maintain an accurate infection control surveillance program for November and December 2025, and January 2026. The facility conducted surveillance only for the residents who exhibited signs and symptoms of infection and were prescribed antimicrobial medications. * The facility failed to ensure the staff performed hand washing after changing trash liner in a room with Clostridium difficile (a bacteria that causes diarrhea, and is usually a side-effect of taking antibiotics) for Resident 3. * The facility failed to ensure the staff performed hand hygiene after administering GT medication and before administering subcutaneous medication for Resident 18 . These failures had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the education regarding the risks and benefits of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were reviewed with the resident and/or resident representative for five of six residents (Residents 27, 8, 1, 18, and 3) reviewed for immunization. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was provided with the education on the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of pneumococcal vaccination before the administration of the pneumococcal vaccination to Resident 1. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the updated VIS (Vaccination Information Sheet) was provided to Resident 1 before the administration of the pneumococcal vaccination. * The facility failed to provide the education on the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination to the resident and/or their representative when Resident 8 did not have records of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. * The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the education on the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccinations were reviewed with the resident and/or resident representative for three of three final sampled residents (Residents 1, 3 and 18) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 8 and 27) reviewed for immunization. * The facility failed to ensure the residents or their representatives wer provided education on the risk, benefits and potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccination before administration of the COVID-19 vaccination to Residents 1 and 3. * The facility failed to ensure the residents or their representative were provided education on the risk, benefits and potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccination when the resident's representative declined the COVID-19 vaccination for Residents 8, 27 and 18. These failures had the potential for the residents and/or their representatives not being informed of the COVID-19 vaccine, the benefits, risks and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications (any drug prescribed to stabilize or improve mood, mental status, or behavior) for one of five final sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 1 ). * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent was obtained from Resident 1 or their responsible party when the frequency of the trazodone (antidepressant) was changed. This failure posed the risk of Resident 1 and his responsible party to not be informed and understand the risks and benefits of the treatment and medications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent Guide, undated ,showed informed consent was required for all residents receiving psychotropic medications and updated when there is medication change. Under the section documentation standard, the P&P showed to document client's right to accept or refuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the resident's advanced directive was available in their medical record for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 13) investigated for Advanced Directives. * The facility failed to obtain a copy of Resident 13's advance directive and place in the resident's medical record. This failure had the potential for the resident's wishes for medical care and choice of healthcare agent not being communicated effectively in the event the resident was unable to make her own medical decisions. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 13 was initiated on 1/28/26. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 13's H&P examination dated 9/2/25, showed the resident had the capacity to understand and make healthcare decisions. Review of Resident 13's POLST dated 9/3/25, showed the resident did not have an advanced directive (a legal document that outlines your preferences for medical treatment and appoints a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate bed hold process was followed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42) reviewed for bed hold. * Resident 42's bed hold was cancelled prior to the end of the seven-day bed hold. This failure resulted in Resident 42 not being allowed to return to the facility when Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital. Findings: On 1/23/26, CDPH received a complaint regarding Resident 42's bed hold being cancelled prior to the end of the seven-day bed hold. Review of the facility's P&P titled SAU (Subacute Unit) Transfer, Discharge, Bed-hold Procedure reviewed 9/2025 showed at the time of transfer/discharge, the patient and family member or legal representative are given a written notice of the bed-hold policy that specifies the duration of the bed hold and readmission criteria after the bed-hold period ends. In addition, the policy showed the SAU allows a patient whose hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's representative was provided with the required information when the resident was transferred and/or discharged for two of three sampled residents (Residents 39 and 42) reviewed for transfer and discharge. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 39 and/or their representative were notified of the transfer and reasons for the transfer in writing when the resident was discharged to an Assisted Living Facility. * The facility failed to provide facility's bed hold policy and notice of transfer when Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital and was not permitted to readmit to the facility. These failures resulted in the interested parties not having the complete information related to the discharge and transfer process. In addition, this failure had the potential for the resident and/or their representative of not knowing about the appeals process and the circumstances of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop detailed resident centered care plans for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 1 and 22).* The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address the use of insulin (medication to lower blood sugar) for Residents 1 and 22.These failures posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans released 11/2022 showed a comprehensive care plan is developed consistent with the patients' conditions, risks, needs, behaviors, preferences and with standards of practice including measurable objectives, interventions/services, and timetable to meet the patient's needs as identified in the patient's assessment or as identified in relation to the patient's response to the interventions or changes in the patient's condition, reflects the patient's needs and preferences and align with the patient cultural…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the individualized and ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 18) reviewed for activities. * The facility failed to provide documentation Resident 18 received meaningful activities from the facility for December 2025 and January 2026. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being.Findings: Review of the facility P&P titled Activity Programs dated 11/2022 showed the facility to provide based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preference of each patient, an ongoing program to support patients in their choices of activities, both group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to provide each patient to have a meaningful life by supporting his/her domains of well-being. Activities are individualized and customized based on the patient previous life style (occupation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for pressure injuries received the care and services to heal the resident's pressure injuries. * Resident 2's special mattress was not functioning properly. In addition, there was no physician's order for the use of the special mattress. This failure posed the risk of delay in healing for Resident 2's pressure injuries. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 1/28/26. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's H&P examination dated 10/8/25, showed Resident 2's diagnoses included Stage IV pressure injuries to her sacrum and left hip. Further review of the H&P showed Resident 2 had the capacity to understand choices and make health care decisions. Review of Resident 2's January 2026 Physician Order Sheet dated 1/29/26, showed a a diagnosis of pressure ulcer of sacral region, Stage IV dated 10/7/25. Further review of the Physician Order Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of one nonsampled resident (Resident 27) reviewed for limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services. * The RNA services and instructions for Resident 27 were not completed. This failure had the potential to result in the decline in Resident 27's range of motion which could lead to further deterioration in the resident's physical well- being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Guideline-Restorative Services dated 8/2025, showed restorative techs are hired , trained, and employed by the rehabilitation department. The restorative plan for each patient is developed through a collaborative effort between nursing and therapy. Once completed, the restorative plan of care is incorporated into nursing plan of care. Patient may receive services up to seven days a week. Patient placed in the restorative program may meet one or more of the criteria from the list which included patient who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper pain assessment, implementation of non pharmacological interventions, and appropriate pain medication administration per physicians' orders for two of five residents (Residents 7 and 13) reviewed for unnecessary medications. * Resident 7's admission pain assessment was incomplete. The resident did not have physicians' orders to appropriately address and treat the resident's pain level, and the facility failed to document and implement NPI for pain management. * Resident 13 did not have documented use of non pharmacological interventions for pain management. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for ineffective pain management and adverse effects related to the use of unnecessary pain medications.Findings: Review of the facility's Subacute Unit (SAU) Procedure - Pain Management P&P reviewed May 2025 showed: - Upon admission, nursing will perform an initial pain assessment to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff were competent. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 2 diluted the crushed medications before administering them via GT for one of two nurses observed for GT medication administration. * The facility failed to ensure the IP/DSD was aware about the VIS (Vaccination Information Sheet) and the need to provide the residents and and their representative with the education on risks, benefits, and potential side effects from the influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccinations. These failures had the potential for a partial dose being administered or the tube becoming clogged. In addition, the failures had the potential for the residents and/or their representatives in the facility of not being informed of the updated influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccinations, the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of the influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccinations to make an informed decision.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to follow-up on the Pharmacist Consultant's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations for one of five residents investigated for Unnecessary Medications. * The facility failed to provide an in-service education to the staff per the Pharmacist Consultant's Report recommendation to remind the staff of administering/holding medications within the ordered parameters. This failure resulted in the continued deficient practice of midodrine (medication to treat low blood pressure) being administered to the residents (Residents 7 and 13) outside of the ordered parameters. Findings:Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) P&P revised 6/1/24, showed the consultant pharmacist will conduct monthly MRR and make recommendations, which will be provided to the facility, and the facility will act upon the recommendations. Review of the facility's MRR binder, showed a Pharmacist's Consultation Report for 12/3-4/25. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 32%. Two of five licensed staff (LVN 2 and RN 4) were found to have made errors during the medication administration observations.* LVN 2 failed to administer the complete dose for four of Resident 13's crushed medications when medication residues were observed in the medication pouches. * RN 4 failed to administer the complete dose for four of Resident 18's crushed medications when the medication residues were observed in the medication pouches and cups. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health.Findings: 1. On 1/29/26 at 0821 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 13 was conducted with LVN 2. LVN 2 was observed crushing the following medications and then transferring them to the individual medication cups to be administered via GT:-hydrocodone 5 mg - acetaminophen 325 mg tablet (controlled medication for pain relief)-cetirizine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for one of five final sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 7), and one of three final sampled residents reviewed for pressure injuries (Resident 4). * Resident 7's documented pain level for each shift did not show the resident's highest pain level for the shift on multiple shifts.* Resident 3's Stage 4 pressure injury was incorrectly documented on their weekly assessment as a DTI (Deep Tissue Injury). These failures resulted in inaccurate medical records for Residents 4 and 7. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 1/28/26. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 7's Physician Order Sheet for January 2026 showed a physician's order dated 12/11/25, to monitor for pain every shift on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst pain). a. Review of Resident 7's TAR for December 2025 showed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the essential equipment in a clean, sanitary, and safe operating condition for two of two sinks (Sinks 1 and 2) inspected. * The facility failed to ensure Sink 1 was working properly. * The facility failed to ensure Sink 2 had no missing knobs on the faucet. These failures resulted in the essential equipment not in operating condition and not to function in the way it was intended, which could expose the residents to unsafe practices.Findings: Review of the facility's Patients Diet List dated 1/28/26, showed a total of 13 out of 36 residents received food prepared in the facility's kitchen. On 1/28/26 at 0750 hours, a tour of the facility's kitchen and concurrent interview was conducted with Dietary Manager 1. When asked about the dishwashing area, Dietary Manager 1 stated Sink 1 was not working. In addition, Sink 2's faucet was observed with missing faucet knobs. Dietary Manager 1 verified the findings. On 1/28/26 at 0817 hours, an interview was conducted with the Engineering Manager.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, closed medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to meet the professional standards of care for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for change of condition. * RT 1 failed to follow the professional standards of care when he attended Resident 1's change of condition. This failure posed the risk of not providing the appropriate and necessary care and services to the resident during a change of condition.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Quality of Care released on 10/2022 showed the Subacute Unit (SAU) identifies and provides needed care and services that are resident centered, in accordance with the resident's preferences, goals for care, and professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs and ensure each resident receives necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being consistent with the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, closed medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the quality care and services were provided for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to obtain the physician's orders and informed consents prior to the beside debridement (the medical removal of dead, damage, or infected tissue to improve the healing potential of the remaining tissue) for Resident 1's scrotal and perineal/perianal wounds. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the wound assessments were completed after the bedside debridement. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the necessary care and services to maintain the resident's highest physical well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled CORE: Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement released 6/2021 showed conservative sharp wound debridement:a. May require more than one session (serial based on the needs of the patient and the characteristics of the wound).c. Each debridement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services related to pressure injuries (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for a long time which reduces blood flow to the area and causes the skin to die and develop a sore to promote wound healing) were provided to three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for wound management. * The facility failed to ensure the physician was informed and a change of condition was initiated when there was an increase in the wound size and necrotic tissue for Resident 1's sacrococcyx (fused bone at the very end of the spine) pressure injury. * The facility failed to ensure the LAL mattress setting was consistent with Residents 2 and 3's weight. These failures posed the risk for complications and delayed wound healing.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled CORE: Clinical Guidelines for Pressure Injury released 6/2022 showed each resident should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the least restrictive alternatives were attempted prior to the use of side rails for six of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 10, 17, 25, 32, 33, and 239) and five nonsampled residents (Residents 8, 12, 19, 27, and 28) reviewed for side rails use. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: The FDA issued a Safety Alert entitled Entrapment Hazards with Hospital Bed Side Rails. Residents most at risk for entrapment are those who are frail or elderly or those who have conditions such as agitation, delirium, confusion, pain, uncontrolled body movement, hypoxia, fecal impaction, acute urinary retention, etc., that may cause them to move about the bed or try to exit from the bed. Entrapment may occur when a resident is caught between the mattress and bed rail or in the bed rail itself. Inappropriate positioning or other care related activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine utilized for the residents and staff was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the microwave utilized to warm up the food was in sanitary condition and free of food residue. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and in good condition. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchenware and kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting board was kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the countertop mounted can opener was in sanitary condition and free of residue. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitizer test strips had not expired. * The facility failed to ensure the expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were complete and the measurements were recorded during the bed inspection when identifying areas of possible entrapment with the use of side rails for six of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 10, 17, 25, 32, 33, and 239) and five nonsampled residents (Residents 8, 12, 19, 27, and 28) reviewed for side rails use. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapments may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper GT care was provided for three of eight final sampled residents (Residents 17, 24, and 32) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 15) reviewed for enteral tubing. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 15 and 24 had the proper labeling of name and date of the GT feeding bottle, water irrigation bag and irrigation set. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 17 and 32's GT dressings were changed daily as ordered. These failures posed the risk for developing complications related to the residents' GT. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administration of Enteral Nutrition revised 6/2023 showed gather and prepare the necessary equipment. Label formula bag with two identifiers, feeding rate and hang date and time. Visually inspect the enteral formula for damage to the container, altered formula if the intgrity is compromised or expired. Label flush bag with date and contents i.e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the intravenous accesses for one nonsampled resident (Resident 30). * The facility failed to ensure the PICC line external catheter and arm circumference measurements were completed and documented in the medical record for Resident 30. In addition, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for the use of PICC line. These failures had the potential to delay the identification of catheter related complications for the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Central Line Placement, Maintenance and Dressing Change dated 6/2023 showed to measure the length of the external PICC line access device and arm circumference with each dressing change and compare with the length documented at insertion. Discrepancies in the measurements from one assessment from to next requires notification to physician. Medical record review for Resident 30 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 13, 23, 25, and 33) and seven nonsampled residents (Resident 2, 8, 12, 19, 26, 30, and 27) reviewed for respiratory care were provided with the appropriate respiratory care when: * The facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula was dated and properly stored for Residents 12 and 33. There was no signage for oxygen usage for Resident 33's room. * The facility failed to ensure the nebulizer mask, tubing, and bag were labeled with the date when it was changed and properly stored for Resident 23. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 2, 13, 25, 26,and 30's nasal cannula tubings were labeled, dated, and not touching the floor. In addition, there should date and label the set-up bags for nasal cannula tubings and nebulizer mask. * The facility failed to ensure the manufacture's maintenance care was followed for the BiPap for Resident 26. * The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were properly stored and labeled. * The facility failed to ensure accuracy and complete records of the Medication Room and Medication Refrigerator temperature log. * The facility failed to dispose of an empty bottle of Hy[DATE] (Sodium Hypochlorite Solution) in the Treatment Cart. * The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart 1 was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the medications were labeled with an opened date in accordance with the facility's policy for Resident 22. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage and Delivery revised 3/5/24, showed to ensure that all medications are stored under proper conditions of sanitation, temperature, light, moisture, ventilation, segregation, safety and security. 1. On 11/20/24 at 1042 hours, a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the pureed recipes were followed for two residents who received pureed food from the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the puree recipe for steamed green beans was followed. This failure had the potential for not providing nutritional meals to meet the needs of residents who were on a pureed diet. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Patient Diet List dated 11/20/24, showed two residents received pureed food prepared from the kitchen, with no restrictions to steamed green beans. Review of the facility's diet spreadsheet titled Menu Plan Fall Winter 2024 showed the lunch menu included steamed green beans for PU4 pureed diet. Review of the facility's pureed recipe titled Steamed [NAME] Beans PU4, Version 12, undated, showed to remove the number of portions required from the regular recipe. Blend until smooth adding on three tablespoon of food thickener per 10 servings to achieve a smooth textured product. Final product should be smooth, pudding like, but not runny. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to protect the resident's rights to be free from the verbal abuse by CNA 1 for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when CNA 1 yelled at Resident 1. Additionally, the facility staff failed to report the incident and intervene in the timely manner as per the facility's P&P. These failures had the potential to cause psychosocial harm to the residents. Findings: Review of the Facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation dated 10/2022 showed the staff report any alleged violations involving verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and neglect of the resident as well as mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation immediately to the Senior Clinician, or Operational Leader, or District, or National Level and to other officials. Each resident is treated with dignity and respect and focuses on assisting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure the resident maintained their highest physical well-being for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). * Resident 2 had a new skin discoloration on her wrist. The facility failed to create a change in condition, notify the physician, develop a care plan, and monitor Resident 2's skin discoloration on her right wrist area. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive the appropriate care and services needed. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Condition Change of a Patient release dated 10/2022 showed upon recognition of a potentially life threatening or significant change in status, the nurse should communicate with other health care providers to meet the needs of the patient. Under the Definitions, Change of Condition sections, the P&P showed to communicate the changes from the patient's normal status at the time of admission, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine utilized for the residents and staff was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the microwave utilize to warm up the residents' food was in sanitary condition and free of food residue. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were kept in a sanitary condition and with cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was air dried prior to storage. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils had a smooth cleanable surface and were in good conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils were clean and free of food particle or residue. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition of the hood over the stove was maintained. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for the residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's census and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility's P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 3, 14, and 33) remained free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to continue to monitor and document assessment every shift for 72 hours post fall incident for Resident 33. * The facility failed to provide bilateral floor mats to Resident 3 as ordered by the physician and according to Resident 3's care plan interventions. * Resident 14's had bilateral upper and lower side rails in place with a physician's order for only the bilateral upper side rails. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for serious injuries. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 33 was initiated on 11/30/23. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 33's History and Physical examination dated 10/27/23, showed Resident 33 was alert and oriented to time, place, and person. Review of Resident 33's MDS dated 11/323,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for GT management for two of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 3 and 32) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 13 and 586). * The facility failed to ensure Residents 3, 13, and 586's GT placement was verified as per the facility's P&P prior to administering the medications via GT. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 586's GT medication was administered by gravity. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 32's GT dressing was labeled with date, time, and initial of the nurse as per the facility's P&P. These failures posed the risk for the residents to experience complications related to their GT. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Administration of Enteral Nutrition dated 8/16/23, showed to verify tube placement by assessing for a change in the external length or incremental marking on the tube at the exit site; and visually inspect gastrostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 7.41%. Two of three licensed nurses (LVNs 2 and 3) who were observed during the medication administration were found to have made errors. * LVN 3 administered the potassium chloride (electrolyte/potassium supplement) liquid without dissolving the medication with water or juice as per the pharmacy instruction label. * LVN 2 administered the tamsulosin (used to treat enlarged prostate) oral capsule by opening the capsule and mixing the granules with water. However, the pharmacy note on the bubble pack showed to swallow the medication whole. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health conditions. Findings: 1.a. On 11/29/23 at 0830 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 13 was conducted with LVN 3. While LVN 3 was preparing Resident 13's morning medications, Resident 13's potassium chloride…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to store the drugs and biologicals in a safe manner. * The facility failed to dispose the expired and discontinued medications and supplies in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] and Medication Cart 1. This failure had the potential for the medications to be accidentally administered and/or diverted. * The facility failed to ensure the blood glucose strips containers in Medication Carts 2 and 3 were labeled with the opened date and discard date. This failure had the potential to result in adverse consequences for the residents. * The facility failed to ensure the medications were not left unattended by LVN 2. This failure had the potential for the medications to be diverted. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Disposal/Destruction of Expired or Discontinued Medication dated [DATE], showed the facility should place all discontinued or outdated medications in a designated, secure location which is solely for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of two IP Nurses completed 10 hours of continuing education annually as recommended by CDPH. This failure had the potential for the IP nurses to not have current and updated infection control training and the potential to provide inaccurate information to the staff. Findings: Review of AFL 20-84 dated November 2020 showed the IP should complete 10 hours of continuing education in the field of IPC on an annual basis. Facilities should provide encouragement and support for IP staff to stay abreast of current news and training sources through a nationally recognized infection prevention and control association. Review of the facility's document titled Job Description for Infection Control (IP) Preventionist revised on November 2022 showed the Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, Expectations of the IP is to remain current with infection prevention and control issues. Review of the facility's document of IP Nurse 1's Certification of Training in Infection Prevention and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide the safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for two of sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). * The facility failed to ensure the staff practiced the contact isolation precautions when entering the room of one sampled resident (Resident 1) who was on contact isolation precautions * The facility failed to ensure the staff practiced the enhanced barrier precautions during high contact-care for one sampled resident (Resident 2) who was on enhanced barrier precautions. These failures posed the risk for the transmission of diseases-causing microorganisms. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Transmission-Based Precautions released on 6/2022 showed contact precaution is a method designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms by direct or indirect contact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers for one of the five sampled residents (Resident 3). * Resident 3's right heel pressure injury was not reassessed for improvement or deterioration. There were no treatment order and care plan developed to address the resident's right heel pressure injury. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to not receive the appropriate wound treatment. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Wound Identification/Assessment released on 10/2022 showed to document in the patient's EMR (electronic medical record): - Measurements of the size of the wound; - Evaluation of the wound bed; - Evaluation of the surrounding skin; - Evaluation of the drainage; - Evaluation of patient for pain or tenderness to touch; - If a change in condition, notification to healthcare provider; - Evaluation of the process of the wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to establish and maintain the infection control practice designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to ensure the nursing staff washed their hands and changed gloves after removing the soiled diaper and providing perineal care. In addition, the staff failed to bag the soiled diapers but placed them on the bed while performing the clean tasks for two sampled residents (Residents 3 and 4). This failure posed the risk for spreading the infectious organisms throughout the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Routine Bathing dated 10/22 showed the following procedure for incontinence clean-up: 1. [NAME] gloves and open pre-packaged bathing cloths, remove 1- 2 cloths, remove bulk of stool using under pad or dry disposable patient washcloths. 2. Remove soiled gloves. 3. [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right was promoted for one of 12 final sampled resident (Resident 10). * Resident 10's catheter drainage bag was not placed in the dignity bag. This failure had the potential to affect the privacy and dignity of the resident. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated on 11/20/24. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 10 had a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the urinary bladder Review of Resident 10's physician's order dated 9/26/24, showed Resident 10 had an order for an indwelling urinary catheter, size Fr 16 with 10 ml balloon, to drainage bag, related to the above diagnosis. In addition, there was a physician's order dated 9/26/24, for a privacy bag, indwelling urinary catheter bag in a privacy bag every shift. On 11/20/24 at 0951 hours, an observation was conducted on Resident 10's indwelling urinary catheter. Resident 10's indwelling urinary catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was properly stored in four of nine garbage dumpsters. This failure had the potential to attract pest/rodents that carried diseases. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Waste Management for Nutrition and Culinary Service revised on 6/2022 showed in the outside dumpster area, to confirm lid or door is closed on the dumpster before leaving the area. Do not leave any trash alongside or on top of the dumpster. Notify supervisor or other designee if the dumpster is too full to dispose the trash or close the lid or door. According to the 2022 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code, outside garbage receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. On 11/20/24 at 1005 hours, an observation with concurrent interview with the EVS Manager was conducted. Four of nine facility's outside garbage dumpsters were observed to have the lids partially propped open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the wound dressing was labeled with date and initial as per the facility's P&P for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 32). This failure posed the risk for Resident 32's wound not possibly assessed for absence or presence of signs and symptoms of infection. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Wound Identification/assessment dated [DATE], showed to redress the wound as ordered by the healthcare provider if applicable and label the dressing with the date and initial. Medical record review for Resident 32 was initiated on 11/30/23. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 32's History and Physical examination dated 10/26/23, showed Resident 32 was awake, opening eyes, sometimes tracking, and not following commands. Review of Resident 32's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 32's BIMS was documented as 3 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician Order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure three of five garbage dumpsters with lids were properly closed. The failure had the potential to attract pest/rodents that carried diseases. Findings: According to the 2022 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code, outside garbage receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. On 11/29/23 at 1002 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Lead Engineer and EVS Manager. Three of five facility's outside garbage dumpsters were observed to have the lids partially propped open by garbage, preventing the lids from fully closing. The EVS Manager verified the findings. The EVS Manager stated the dumpsters lids should be fully closed to prevent animals, flies, and rodents from getting in to the trash and cause cross contamination.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was properly stored in five of five garbage dumpsters. The failure had the potential to attract pest/rodents that carried diseases. Findings: According to the 2022 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code, outside garbage receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. On 10/12/23 at 0825 hours, an observation of the facility's outside garbage dumpsters was conducted. Five of five garbage dumpsters were observed to have the lids open. Two of the five dumpsters were observed with garbage above the rim of the dumpster. Two of the five dumpsters were also observed with garbage on the ground around their perimeter. On 10/12/23 at 0930 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the facility's Lead Engineer. The Lead engineer verified the above findings and acknowledged leaving the dumpster lids open and allowing trash to overflow on the ground can attract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to KINDRED HEALTHCARE — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 02/26/1998 |
| KENTUCKY HOSPITAL HOLDINGS JV LP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/02/2018 |
| KENTUCKY HOSPITAL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/02/2018 |
| KENTUCKY HOSPITAL INTERMEDIATE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/02/2018 |
| KINDRED HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 07/02/2018 |
| KNIGHT HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/23/2021 |
| KNIGHT HEALTH LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/23/2021 |
| BEAN, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/14/2004 |
| BILLINGSLEY, LINN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 07/02/2018 |
| GRAESER, SCOTT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 06/24/2022 |
| KHABAZ, FARHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/17/2025 |
| SCHIAVONE, DEANNA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 08/22/2022 |
| ROCK, DANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/09/2024 |
| TRAYLOR, JOHNETTA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/09/2024 |
| VADECHA, JAINAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555859. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.