Kindred Hospital South Florida Hollywood

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 31.0 residents a day — about 103% occupied, or roughly -1 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.35 to 1.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement and failed to ensure that safety measures were in place to prevent elopement for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The findings included:A review of the education titled Hollywood-Elopement Education (undated) documented the following: when a resident is monitored due to confusion or the concern that they may exit the Unit, this means that a staff member must always have the resident in their visual field. Residents who exit the Unit without staff knowledge, even if they remain inside the hospital, should be reported to facility leadership immediately as a potential elopement. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 6/12/202 with diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure, Heart Failure, and Muscle Weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide Maintenance and Housekeeping services to provide a clean and home like environment for residents in 14 of 17 rooms, in the corridor, at the nursing station, and the Supply Room. The findings included: During the initial pool process, beginning on 12/16/24 at 10:12 AM, the following were noted: In room [ROOM NUMBER], a portion of the wall, at the left of the air conditioning unit, the surface was missing, exposing the unfinished surface underneath the paint. In room [ROOM NUMBER], a portion of the wall to the right of the entrance inside of the room, the painted surface was missing, exposing the unfinished surfaces underneath the paint. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the painted surface of the door was chipped at the lower right side of the entrance door, exposing the surface underneath, and there was an accumulation of dust on the air conditioning vent inside of the entrance to the room. During a room-by-room tour of the facility, beginning on 12/17/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to serve lunch according to the menu and recipe on 12/18/24, with the potential to affect 26 residents that eat by mouth from the kitchen. The findings included: The lunch menu for 12/18/24 documented that residents would be served fried shrimp with waffle fries, and the alternate as baked fish. The recipe for fried shrimp (no reference date), provided by the Culinary Director, documented that one portion of fried shrimp would consist of 6 shrimp that would equal a 4-ounce serving. The recipe for the baked fish (no reference date), provided by the Culinary Director, documented that one portion of the fish would equal a 4-ounce serving. The production sheet for the meal, provided by the Culinary Director, documented that residents would receive 6 fried shrimp for a total weight of 4 ounces or one piece of baked fish that should weigh 4 ounces. During an observation of lunch being assembled in the main kitchen, on 12/18/24 at 11:53 AM, accompanied by the Culinary Director, Staff A, the [NAME] was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to secure two (2) ordered prescription medications during a Medication Administration Observation for Resident #25, secured two (2) un-ordered prescription eye drop medications during an observational room tour for Resident #4, secure a Wound Care Treatment Cart #2; and, the facility failed to promptly discard nine (9) expired treatment gauze dressings, noted during a Wound Care Treatment Cart storage observation. The findings included: Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biologicals revised on [DATE], and provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented in the Policy Statement: Policy 5.3 sets forth the procedures relating to the storage and expiration dates of medications, biologicals, syringes, and needles. Procedure: .1. Facility should ensure that only authorized facility staff, as defined by facility, should have possession of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it cleaned and sanitized a multi-use Glucometer machine in-between resident use during a Glucometer Observation, for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed, Resident #18; and failed to promptly discard outdated/expired resident sample laboratory blood/biological specimen tubes left, unaddressed, in the Soiled Utility Room refrigerator. The findings included: 1. Record review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring using a NovaStat Strip Glucometer, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) release date 09/2023, documented in the Policy Statement: Kindred Subacute Units monitors blood glucose monitoring according to Physician's Orders .Rational: Blood glucose tells what the blood glucose level is at any given time and is the main tool to monitor Diabetes control. Good control means that the patient gets as close to normal (non-Diabetic) blood glucose level as possible .Patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) treat a resident in a dignified manner, as evidenced by, allowing a resident to leave the facility for a doctor's appointment only wearing a hospital gown and an incontinence brief and waiting at the doctor's office for an extended period of time after the appointment; and 2) contact or notify the resident's responsible party in advance of a Doctor's appointment, in a timely manner, which allowed the resident to attend the appointment alone and unattended for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed, Resident #1. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Quality of Care provided by the acting Director of Nursing (DON) dated 10/2022 documented in the Policy Statement: The Subacute Unit (SAU) identifies and provides needed care and services that are patient centered, in accordance with the patient's preferences, goals for care and professional standards of practice that will meet each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility was not disposing of garbage and refuse properly. The findings included: During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 09/05/23 at 9 AM accompanied with the Food Service Manager (FSM), the following was noted: Observation of the facility's commercial dumpster that is located at the facility's receiving dock on 08/05/23 at 9 AM noted that there was a large circular hole of approximately 18 inches located below the dumpster door. Further observation noted the interior to have a large build-up area of black slime within the cavity of the dumpster. It was also noted to have numerous flying insects and an offensive garbage odor. Interview with the FSM at the time of the observation revealed that the Hospital Administration had been notified numerous times over the past 2 months by the SNU (Skilled Nursing Unit) Administration that a new commercial dumpster was required for potential sanitation issues. It was also discussed with the facility Administrator that the issues concerning the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) follow infection control standards for 1 of 1 sampled residents observed, during a Medication Administration Observation (Resident #181); 2) ensure that it followed infection control standards for 1 of 1 sampled residents observed were followed during a Glucometer Observation (Resident #78), and; 3) transport and store resident linens, in a sanitary manner. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) with a release date of 11/2022 documented in the Policy Statement: An Infection Prevention and Control Program is designed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment involving each department. Definitions: Staff----All facility staff (direct and indirect) .others who provide care and services to patients on behalf of the facility Hygienically clean refers to being free of pathogens…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the kitchen air-conditioning vents (2) and commercial food preparation equipment (steamers X 2) were not in safe operating condition. This effected potentially 23 of the 25 facility residents. The findings included: During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 09/05/23 at 9 AM and accompanied with the Food Service Manager (FSM), the following were noted: 1) Two ceiling mounted kitchen air-conditioning vents located in the food preparation area were noted to have a large build-up of condensation. Continued observation noted that the condensation build-up was dripping down onto prepared foods, food preparation surfaces and tables, and staff. It was discussed with the Food Service Manager (FSM) that the dripping condensation could potentially result in food contamination. The FSM stated that the condensation issues was reported to maintenance 1-2 months ago without repair or resolution. 2) Observation of the commercial steamers noted that 1 of the 2 steamers was not working…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0914 — pattern
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to equip 12 semi-private resident rooms with ceiling suspended curtains that assure full privacy for 21 of 21 facility residents. The findings included: During the screening of residents and room observations conducted on 09/05/23, it was noted that the privacy curtains located within semi-private resident rooms did not provide full privacy for the 21 of 21 residents. The surveyor requested that the Housekeeping Director tour the resident rooms to identify the room privacy curtain issues. The rooms identified with the director included the following: room [ROOM NUMBER]: (Semi Private - two beds - occupied) room [ROOM NUMBER]: (Semi Private - two beds - occupied) room [ROOM NUMBER]: (Semi Private - two beds - occupied) room [ROOM NUMBER]: (Semi Private - two beds - not occupied) room [ROOM NUMBER]: (Semi Private - two beds - only 1 occupied) room [ROOM NUMBER]: (Semi Private - two beds - occupied) room [ROOM NUMBER]: (Semi Private - two beds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KINDRED HEALTHCARE — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in FL