Glenbrook

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 532 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 90.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 191 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 54.9 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.10 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.41 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the nutritional status was monitored and acceptable parameters were maintained for one of one resident, (Resident 23), with unintended, unplanned severe weight loss of 16.43% in six months (9/4/22-2/4/23) when: 1) The resident's nutritional status was not reassessed, the laboratory values were not drawn, or the interventions were modified after five, ten, or fifteen percent of weight loss occurred, according to facility policy and standards of practice. 2) The resident was not placed on weekly weights from 9/1/2022-3/31/2023 to monitor weight status after a loss of five or ten percent of body weight, according to policy. 3) The resident's meals and snack/nourishment consumption were not monitored to determine the resident's actual food intake in order to evaluate nutrition status, according to facility policy. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 23 experiencing further functional decline, loss of lean body mass…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate nonpharmacological or behavioral intervention before initiating antipsychotic medications (medication to treat psychosis [mental disorder characterized by disconnection from reality]) for two of five sample residents (Residents 31 and 49).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 31 and 49 to receive unnecessary antipsychotic medication or inappropriate dose for behavioral treatment.Findings:1. A review of Resident 31's admission Record indicated the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes memory and other cognitive decline), dementia (loss of mental function such as thinking, memory and reasoning skills), delusional disorders (false belief of reality), depression, mild cognitive impairment and disorientation.A review of Resident 31's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/12/25, indicated Resident 31 was alert to person and not to place and time.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Residents 2, 44 and 11) knew the location of the survey results binder.This failure had the potential to keep residents, family members, and visitors from easily reviewing the most recent survey results and the facility's plan of corrections, which were essential for making informed decisions about living at the facility.During an interview on 9/17/25 at 2:30 PM, three of four residents polled at the resident council meeting did not know the location of the survey results binder.During a concurrent observation of the facility and interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 9/17/25 at 4:37 PM. The ADM verified the three locations of the survey results binders and confirmed there was no sign at one of the sites in the facility indicating where to find it. ADM stated that the facility did not have a policy and procedure regarding posting and accessibility of survey results. A review of the State of California-Health and Human Services Agency, Attachment F Resident [NAME] of Rights, Section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes) before discharge for two of four sampled residents (Resident 5 and 7). This deficient practice had the potential to leave residents unprotected from improper discharge and deny them access to an advocate for their options and rights.1.During a review of Resident 7's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/2/25, the H&P indicated Resident 7 was sent to the hospital on 8/24/25, and came back to the facility on 8/30/25. During an interview with the SSD on 9/18/25, at 10:11 AM. She stated the facility must send written notification to the ombudsman when resident was discharged or transferred. Medical records staff must send the notification. During a concurrent interview and record review with the (MRD) on 9/18/25, at 10:21 AM, MRD confirmed there was no written notification of transfer sent to the ombudsman. A review of the facility's policy and procedure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly identify and provide necessary assistive devices for repositioning for one of the sampled residents (Resident 27).This failure had the potential to cause accident and injury to Resident 27.During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 27 on 9/16/25 at 9:28 AM, Resident 27 was observed holding on to the bedside drawer while turning to their side. Resident 27 expressed difficulty repositioning in bed. Resident 27 had been using the bedside table drawer to assist in turning to their side.A review of Resident 27's admission Records dated 9/18/25, indicated Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE].A review of Resident 27's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/5/25, indicated a chief complaint of fall which resulted in right femur fracture (a complete or partial break in a bone, often caused by excessive force, an accident, or repetitive stress). The H&P also indicated Resident 27 had the capacity to make own healthcare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident ' s (Resident 1) written care plan for transfers was consistently implemented. Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall while transferring into a chair. Findings: A review of the admission Record for Resident 1 reflected Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: unspecified dementia (a condition of decline in thinking ability and memory); diabetic neuropathy (a severe condition caused by high blood sugar, and symptoms can include sensations of pain, numbness or burning, loss of balance or weakness). On 9/20/24 an unscheduled visit was made to the facility in response to a report of Resident 1 falling and fracturing her left wrist. On 9/20/24 at 12:10 P.M. Resident 1 was interviewed in her room. Resident 1 is sitting up in bed, with a clean cast on her left wrist. Resident 1 stated her arm and cast is very awkward, and needs extra care. Resident 1 stated she was still working with therapy as much as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0800 — widespread
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure overall systems were met for the Food and Nutrition Services in the kitchen when: a resident experienced an unplanned insidious severe weight loss of 16% in a six months; residents' food temperatures were not monitored for safety and palatability; kitchen staff did not perform tasks competently for food safety in food preparation, food storage, and sanitation for dishwashing and dish storage; kitchen staff did not monitor the temperatures in the dry storage room and emergency food supply room closet to ensure safe quality of the food supply; recipes were not followed for time and temperature control for food safety foods (TCS); and fruit fly pests were found in the kitchen. These failures placed all residents at risk for harm and exposure to contamination that had the potential to impair their nutrition and health status. The facility census was 57. Cross reference F692, F802, F803, F804, F812, F925 Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 8/21/23 at 8:14 A.M., multiple observations and concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff competently carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services department when: 1. A Kitchen staff did not correctly label and date TCS (Time/Temperature Controlled for food safety) foods in a walk-in refrigerator and did not monitor the dry storage room by correctly labeling, dating, and checking the quality of the food supply. 2. A Lead [NAME] (LCK) did not prepare the tuna salad correctly using the cool down process for ambient temperature foods. 3. A Dishwasher did not enter the dish machine wash and rinse temperatures on a log in a timely manner. These failures placed all residents at risk of cross contamination and the potential to acquire food-borne illnesses. The census was 57. Cross reference F800, F804, F812 Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 8/21/23 at 8:25 A.M., an observation of the walk-in refrigerator and interview with the Executive Chef (EXC) was conducted. There was a metal tray of soup ingredients on the first two shelves that included sliced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation practices were met in the kitchen according to standards of practice when: 1. An ice scooper was left inside the ice machine. 2. The kitchen's clean dish storage area had dirty serving utensils and debris in tray with clean dishes. 3. A Lead cook (LCK) did not prepare the tuna salad correctly using the cool down process for ambient temperature foods. 4. The floor in the walk-refrigerator and freezer had dirty label, brown stains, trash and other debris on the floor. 5. Fruit flies were in the flying around uncovered food in the kitchen and dry storage area. These failures exposed residents to contaminated food and unsanitary practices, which had the potential to place them at risk of developing foodborne illness. The facility census was 57. Cross- reference F800, F802, F925 Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour on 8/21/23 at 8:25 A.M., an ice machine scooper was found inside the ice machine. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 8:30 A.M., with the Director of Food and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care/treatment was provided according to professional standards of practice for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 3 and 45) when: 1. Licensed nurses (LN) did not respond to Resident 3's low blood glucose reading (a value less than 70 mg/dl [milligrams/deciliter]) by assessing the resident for signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose/sugar) and notifying the resident's physician. In addition, LN did not clarify Resident 3's physician order related to a low blood glucose parameter. 2. A response to a change of condition related to nutritional assessment was not conducted in a timely manner. As a result, there was the potential risk to the residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes mellitus (the body's inability to regulate blood sugar) and dementia (a condition characterized by impairment of at least two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of eight sampled residents (Resident 361) reviewed for medication administration, received the medication in accordance with the physician's orders. This failure had the potential for the for Resident 361 to experience unexpected medication side effects or decreased drug action. Findings: During an observation on 8/23/23 at 9:38 A.M., licensed nurse (LN) 2 gave Resident 361 Aspirin 81 (milligram) mg chewable using a plastic spoon. Resident 361 swallowed the medication and did not chew the chewable Aspirin. LN 2 did not provide instructions to Resident 361 and the resident did not chew the Aspirin before swallowing. An interview on 8/23/23 at 9:42 A.M., with LN 2 was conducted. LN 2 stated that Resident 361 should have been instructed that the Aspirin was chewable and needed to be chewed first before swallowing to help with absorption. A review of Resident 361's physician's order on 8/23/2023 indicated an order for Aspirin chewable 81 milligram 1 tablet daily. During an interview on 8/25/2023 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,311 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,311 — penalty dated 2023-08-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUING LIFE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA