Park Vista At Morningside
2525 Brea Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92835 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (714) 256-1000 Medicare only — no Medicaid
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 293 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 148 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.2%CMS range 58.1–69.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 7.1–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 84.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 74.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.0%CMS range 3.0–7.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 51.2 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.73 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for safety was free from accident/hazards. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 4 was evaluated to handle and consume hot beverages as per the facility's P&P. In addition, Residents 8 and 9 were also not evaluated to handle and consume hot beverages. * RNAs 1 and 2 failed to notify a licensed nurse immediately after Resident 4 spilled hot tea onto her lap. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4 was provided the immediate and appropriate interventions when Resident 4 spilled hot tea to her left upper thigh. In addition, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order to properly treat a burn for Resident 4's left thigh. Theses failures resulted in Resident 4 sustaining a blisters to her left thigh and delay in the provision of the necessary and appropriate care/interventions which could potentially affect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. * The facility failed to maintain an accurate infection control surveillance log and match the data in the QA infection control for June, July, September, and October 2025. * The facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented in the facility's laundry room. * The facility failed to ensure the EBPs were followed for Resident 55 when the RNA 1 did not wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before providing care to the resident. * The facility failed to maintain infection control when the DSD/ IP placed the box of clean gloves on Resident 55's bed, which touched the incontinent pad on the resident's bed during wound care. * The facility failed to follow their Water Management Program's swamp cooler and decorative fountain's testing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of new pressure injury (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for a long time which reduces blood flow to the area and causes the skin to die and develop a sore) and promote healing of the existing pressure ulcer for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 55) reviewed for pressure injury. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 55's pressure injury was evaluated regularly. * The DSD/IP failed to ensure to follow the physician's order to cleanse Resident 55's pressure injury with normal saline during wound care observation. These failures posed the risks of complications and delayed wound healing for Resident 55.Findings: a. Review of the facility's P&P titled Pressure Injury Mitigation and Skin Management Program reviewed on 11/27/24, showed the care and intervention for any identified skin breakdown or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services for one final sampled resident (Resident 65) reviewed for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 65's fluid output every shift for the use of the indwelling urinary catheter. In addition, the facility failed to provide bladder training prior to discontinuing the indwelling urinary catheter as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential for not providing the necessary care and services and posed a risk for adverse complications related to the indwelling urinary catheter use for Resident 65.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Intake and Output Protocol revised 11/11/24, showed the fluid intake and output is recorded for each resident if ordered by the physician, for each resident with new indwelling catheter. Intake and output are recorded daily and evaluated weekly. Residents with justified diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services for the use of the GT was provided for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 42) reviewed for the GT use. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 42's HOB (head of bed) was elevated at a 90-degree angle during the infusion of the enteral feeding via GT as per the physician's order, to reduce the risk of aspiration (inhaling foreign material i.e. food, liquid or vomit, into the lungs). This failure posed the risk of complications related to the use of the GT for Resident 42.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Physician Order revised 10/24/25, showed to establish clear guidelines for the receipt, documentation, implementation, and review of physician order ensuring safe, effective, and compliant with resident care. Nursing staff must review and implement physician orders. Medical record review for Resident 42 was initiated on 12/3/25. Resident 42 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate physicians' orders were obtained for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 35) reviewed for the intravenous therapy. * Resident 35 did not have current physicians' orders for the midline catheter's monitoring and dressing changes. This failure had the potential for the residents not receiving proper midline catheter care, as well as a delay in identifying and preventing potential catheter complications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Physician Order revised 10/24/25, showed all the resident care in the facility must be based on a valid physician order. Medical record review for Resident 35 was initiated on 12/3/25. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 35's IV MAR for November 2025 showed the following physician's orders:- to measure the arm circumference three inches above the midline catheter insertion site every week and PRN with dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the respiratory care and services for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 36 and 66) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for the administration of continuous oxygen and failed to ensure the nasal cannula was labeled with date for Resident 36. * The facility failed to clean Resident 66's CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, is a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while a person sleeps) machine as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive the appropriate care and may negatively impact on the residents' medical conditions.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Physician Order revised 10/24/25, showed to establish clear guidelines for the receipt, documentation, implementation, and review of physician order ensuring safe, effective, and compliant with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper medication storage. * The facility failed to ensure medications were not kept in the resident's room for one of 15 final sampled residents (Resident 42). The facility failed to ensure a container of CBD Pain Relief Ointment (pain reliever) medication was not kept at Resident 42's bedside table. * The facility failed to ensure the medications were stored and labeled properly in one of two medication carts inspected (Medication Cart A). * The facility failed to ensure the orally administered medications were stored separately from the externally used medications in one of two medication storage rooms inspected (Medication Room A). These failures posed the risk of unauthorized access, drug diversion, and medication administration errors and posed the risk for cross contamination of the medications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff had the appropriate skill sets to safely perform the daily operation of the Food and Nutrition Services Department. * The Dietary Aide failed to check the temperature of the hot beverages correctly during tray line. This failure posed the risk of burn injury to the residents receiving hot beverages from the kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Residents per Dining Room - Lunch dated 12/9/25, showed seven residents received hot water prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Safe Holding and Serving Temperatures for Hot Beverages revised 5/2/17, showed to serve the hot beverages between 140 and 155 degrees Fahrenheit. The Dietary should record hot beverage temperatures for every meal. Allow hot liquids to cool before serving. Review of the facility's in-services for temperature checking and logging of hot beverages dated 9/6, 9/15, 10/23 through 10/26/25, and 12/4/25. The Dietary Aide was in attendance for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Aide sanitized the thermometer before checking the temperature of hot beverage during tray line. * The facility failed to ensure one of the three ice machines (Ice Machine 1) was sanitary, kept free of buildup, and free from accumulation of rust. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for the residents receiving beverages and ice from the kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's MDS Resident Matrix dated 12/3/25, 51 residents consumed food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-702.11 Before Use after cleaning. Utensils and food-contact surfaces of equipment shall be sanitized before use after cleaning. On 12/4/25 at 1200 hours, the Dietary Aide was observed checking the temperature of the hot water during tray line. The Dietary Aide was then observed setting the thermometer down onto a clip board…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, facility failed to have a full-time, dedicated IP. This failure had the potential for the Infection Prevention and Control Program not being implemented without the proper oversight.Findings: Review of All Facilities Letter (AFL) Summary dated 12/13/21, showed the SNFs continue to be required to employ a full-time, dedicated IP, a role that may be filled by either one full-time IP or by two staff members sharing the IP responsibilities, provided the total time dedicated to the IP role equals at least the time of a full-time staff member. IP hours are prohibited from inclusion in the calculation of 3.5 direct care hours per patient day provided to SNF residents. Review of the facility's All Home time record showed:- The DSD/IP worked with Infection Prevention 20 hours per week for the months of October and November 2025.- RN 2 worked with Infection Prevention for 18.74 hours for the months of October 2025, and a total of eight hours for the month of November 2025. On 12/5/25 at 1102 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSD/IP.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary wound care services to one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to provided Resident 1's wound treatment as per the physician's order. In addition, the facility failed to accurately monitor and document the wound care provided to Resident 1. This failure had the potential for the resident's wound to become worse and negatively affect the resident's well-being.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 8/27/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and transferred to an acute care facility on 8/16/25. Review of Resident 1's SBAR Communication Form dated 7/31/25, showed Resident 1 had a skin tear to the right distal medial aspect of the right lower leg. Review of Resident 1`s Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 7/31/25, for full thickness skin tear to the right distal medial aspect of lower leg, to apply Steri-Strips (adhesive bandage strips used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care services were provided for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was provided with the continuous oxygen via nasal cannula and Resident 2's oxygen saturation was maintained greater than 92% as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential for the resident to not receive the necessary respiratory services and negatively impact the resident's well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Physicians Orders and Telephone Orders dated 11/2017 showed the physicians orders shall be obtained prior to the administration of any medication or treatment from a personal lawfully authorized to prescribe for and treat human illness. All orders must be specific and complete and no standing orders shall be accepted. All orders shall be specific and complete with all the necessary details to carry out the prescribed order without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for three of nine sampled residents (Residents 4, 6, and 7). * Treatment Nurse 1 failed to perform hand hygiene and changed her gloves after removing the soiled wound dressing for Resident 4. In addition, Treatment Nurse 1 failed to dispose the unused gauze brought in resident's room and ensure the alcohol based sanitizer used was not expired. * CNA 4 failed to wear gloves and perform hand hygiene after touching contaminated items inside Resident 4's contact isolation room. In addition, CNA 4 then proceeded to deliver Resident 7's meal tray without performing hand hygiene. * CNA 4 failed to wear gloves and perform hand hygiene after touching contaminated items inside Resident 6's contact isolation room. In addition, CNA 4 then proceeded to feed Resident 6 without performing hand hygiene. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the refrigerator used for residents' food brought in by visitors and expired foods were discarded. * The facility failed to ensure the foods were stored off the floor. * The facility failed to ensure the plate lowerator (adjustable heated plate dispenser), can opener, kitchen microwave, oven, and warmer were clean. * The facility failed to ensure the egg salad was not stored on the shelf containing raw meats. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Diet Count by Diet dated 12/2/24, showed 50 of 54 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility P&P titled Food Storage revised 7/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the RD evaluations and interventions related to weight loss were conducted timely for one of one final sampled residents (Resident 18) reviewed for nutrition. This failure had the potential for further weight loss and not meeting the nutrition needs for the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Weight Management Guidelines revised 12/2023 showed the residents with significant weight variance should be identified and appropriate intervention implemented. Suggested parameters for evaluating significance of unplanned and undesired weight loss/gain are: a. 1 (one) week - 2-3% is significant; greater than 3% is severe. b. 1 (one) month - 5% is significant; greater than 5% is severe. c. 3 (three) months - 7.5% is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe. Further review of the P&P showed to follow best practice guidelines for interventions. Obtain residents preferences regarding interventions and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of four final sampled residents (Residents 31, 32, 36, and 18) reviewed for respiratory care were provided with the appropriate respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 36's oxygen was administered as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to change the humidifier and the oxygen nasal cannula (flexible tube to deliver oxygen into the nose) timely. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 32's oxygen nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 31's oxygen nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary manner and changed timely. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 18's oxygen nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary manner. These failures had the potential to affect the respiratory health and well-being of the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 36 was initiated on 12/2/24. Resident 36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services necessary to ensure the accurate reconciliation and disposal of medications. * The facility failed to ensure one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 25) medications were not left at the resident's bedside. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of one nonsampled resident (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure the count performed for all controlled medications in the Omnicell (automatic drug delivery system) was accurate as per the facility's P&P. This failure posed the risk of medication diversion. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's routine medication was available. This failure had the potential to result in poor health outcomes to the resident. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Automated Drug Delivery System (ADDS) dated 2022 showed the pharmacy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 25) was free of significant medication errors. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 25 was administered the piperacillin sodium tazobactam medication (antibiotic) as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Adminsitering Medications dated 2001 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless, otherwise specified. Medical record review for Resident 25 was initiated on 12/2/24. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 25's H&P examination dated 11/5/24, showed Resident 25 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 25's Order Summary Report dated active as of 12/3/24, showed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed ensure proper storage and label of medications in one of two medication storage rooms (Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]) and two of three medication carts (Medication Carts A and C) when: * An opened tuberculin (medication used to help diagnose tuberculosis) vial was stored in the refrigerator inside Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] without an open date. An opened box of instant food thickener was stored in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] and contained multiple expired packets of food thickener. In addition, a bag of the home medications without a resident's name was stored in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]. * Temperature log for Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] had multiple missing entries on multiple dates. * Three packets of Non-Adhesive Pad was stored in Medication Cart A and had expired on 6/2024. * Residents 14 and 40's topical medications in Medication Cart C was not labeled with an open date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for three of 50 residents who received food from the kitchen. * Residents 22, 40, and 43 were not provided with the garlic breadstick as per the lunch menu on 12/2/24. This failure had the potential for the residents not receiving adequate nutrition and not receiving the menu as planned. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Diet Count by Diet dated 12/2/24, showed 50 of 54 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's document titled Daily Spreadsheet - Monday dated 12/2/24, showed the following menu for lunch: - regular/NAS (no added salt) diet included a serving of a garlic breadstick and butter; - easy to chew diet included a soft and buttered garlic breadstick; and - soft and bite sized diet and pureed diet included a serving of pureed garlic breadstick and butter. a. On 12/2/24 at 1200 hours, LVN 1 was observed checking the meals in a meal cart. LVN 1 stated he checked if the diet matched the texture on the meal tray. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 30) had accurate and complete medical record. * The facility also failed to ensure the monitoring of behavior for the psychotropic medication on Resident 2's MAR was completed. This failure had the potential for the resident's care needs not being met as the medical record was incomplete and inaccurate. Findings: Medical record review of Resident 30 was initiated on 12/2/24. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 30's Order Summary Report dated 12/3/24, showed the following physician's orders: - dated 3/26/24, to monitor behavior for poor meal intake (less than 50 percent) for Remeron (antidpressant medication). - dated 8/2/23, to monitor behavior for verbalization of feeling anxious every shift for buspirone (antidepressant medication). - dated 6/25/24, to monitor behavior of anxiety manifested by biting nails and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections to two of 17 final sample residents (Residents 26 and 31) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 2) when: * The facility failed to ensure LVN 3 donned the appropriate PPE when administering medications through the GT tube for Resident 26 who was on the EBP precautions. In addition, Resident 26's isolation cart was touching the trash inside the resident's room. *The facility failed to ensure LVN 2 donned the appropriate PPE when administering medications to one nonsampled resident (Resident 2) on the EBP precautions. * A stack of incontinence briefs was observed on top of the isolation cart inside the Room A. In addition, the isolation cart was observed touching the trash bin. * Resident 31's incontinence briefs were stored on the floor at the right side of the bed. In addition, the isolation cart inside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of five final sampled residents (Residents 12, 21, 25, and 507) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 24) reviewed for immunizations were educated and offered the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations as evidenced by: * The facility failed to offer the educational materials for the risks and benefits for the pneumococcal and influenza vaccines to Residents 12, 21, 24, 25, and 507 as per the facility's P&P. In addition, the facility failed to indicate which pneomococcal vaccine was offered for Residents 12, 21, 24, 25, and 507. These failures put the residents at risk for infection and transmission of pneumococcal and influenza infections. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pnemococcal Vaccine Guidelines dated 1/3/24, showed all the residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the essential kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operation condition when the ice machine manufacturer cleaning and sanitizing instructions were not followed for two of three ice machines (Ice Machines 1 and 2) in the facility. This failure had the potential to result in the equipment to not function in the way it was intended which could affect the health status of the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Ice Machine revised 10/2018 under the section titled Frequency: Two Times per Year -Internal Components, showed per the Food Code, the internal components must be cleaned and sanitized per manufacturer guidelines, county or state regulations and not less than two times per year. Review of the ice machine instruction manual for the Hoshizaki ice machine undated, showed the appliance must be maintained in accordance with the instruction manual and labels provided. Failure to install, operate, and maintain the equipment in accordance with this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were accurate and complete; and the measurements were recorded during the bed inspection when identifying areas of possible entrapment with the use of bed side rails for three of three final sampled residents (Residents 507, 30, and 38) reviewed for the entrapment risk. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapments may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed rails, between the bed rails and mattresses,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the P&P for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act. Resident's 1 allegation of physical abuse was not reported to the local enforcement agency as per the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential for the abuse allegation going unreported and uninvestigated. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Elder Abuse;Identification Investigation & Reporting dated January 2024 showed the Administrator in conjunction with the Director of Nursing notifies the following of a suspected abuse incident within two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse or serious bodily injury; and 24 hours if the alleged violation does not involve abuse and does not result in serious bodily injury: a. state licensing/certification agency; b. local ombudsman; c. resident's legal representative of record (via telephone); d. resident's attending physician (via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the kitchen * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the refrigerator used for residents' food brought in by visitors. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the foods stored in the refrigerator belonged to the residents and not the staff, and expired foods were discarded. * The facility failed to ensure the foods were stored off the floor. * The facility failed to ensure a proper sanitary condition of the ice machine. * The facility failed to ensure the plate lowerator (adjustable heated plate dispenser) and resident refrigerator were clean. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were in sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the cooking utensils were in good repair. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 16 final sampled residents (Residents 38 and 39) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 23) were provided with the respiratory care to prevent possible respiratory tract complications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 38 received the necessary care for breathing treatments via CPAP machine. * The facility failed to provide the oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician to Resident 39. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 23's nebulizer mask was dated and stored in a sanitary manner. These posed the risk of the residents not receiving the appropriate breathing treatments and the spread of infection to the residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled CPAP/BiPAP revised March 2015 showed to review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow for the machine. Under the general guidelines for cleaning, it showed to wipe the machine with warm, soapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 16 final sampled residents (Resident 31) remained free from accident hazards related to the use of elevated side rails. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order was obtained and the care plan problem was developed prior to the use of side rails for Resident 31. This had the potential to put the resident at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: The FDA issued a Safety Alert entitled Entrapment Hazards with Hospital Bed Side Rails. Residents most at risk for entrapment are those who are frail or elderly or those who have conditions such as agitation, delirium, confusion, pain, uncontrolled body movement, hypoxia, fecal impaction, acute urinary retention, etc., that may cause them to move about the bed or try to exit from the bed. Entrapment may occur when a resident is caught between the mattress and bed rail or in the bed rail itself. Inappropriate positioning or other care related activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services for one of 16 final sampled residents (Resident 41). * Resident 41's lorazepam (antianxiety medication) Controlled or Antibiotic Drug Record did not match Resident 41's MAR. LVN 1 did not document the lorazepam administration in the resident's MAR. This failure posed the risk for diversion of controlled medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Controlled Substances revised April 2019 showed under the section for Administration, the nurse administering the medication is responsible for recording the time of administration. On 4/19/23 at 1501 hours, review of Resident 41's Controlled or Antibiotic Drug Record and MAR was conducted with LVN 2. Review of Resident 41's lorazepam Controlled or Antibiotic Drug Record showed Resident 41 was administered lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet on 1/13/23 at 1050 hours. Review of Resident 41's January 2023 MAR failed to show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to store the drugs and biologicals in a safe manner. * The facility failed to discard outdated sterile dressing kit tray found in the intravenous cart (Medication Cart B). This posed the risk for this cleaning wound supplies lose their sterility making them unsafe to use. * The facility failed to ensure the oral medications were stored separately from externally used medications and failed to ensure the Sani wipes were stored separately from the medications found in Medication Cart A. This posed the risk for cross-contamination of the medications. * The facility failed to label three bottles of medications for one nonsampled resident (Resident 20) and failed to dispose of the discontinued medication for one nonsampled resident who had been discharged (Resident 459) from the facility. These failures posed the risk of medication errors. * The facility failed to disposed of the expired antibiotic ointment and glucose gel tubes found in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA&A) plan of action. There was no documentation to show the facility was monitoring the effects of the corrective action plan to identify if they had achieved and sustained the improvement for the repeated deficient practice cited at F695 in accordance with their POC for an abbreviated survey completed on 2/18/20. This had the potential to affect the quality of care for all the residents in the facility. Findings: On 4/21/23 at 1400 hours, an interview and concurrent facility document review was conducted with the Administrator. Review of the POC submitted by the facility to the CDPH, L&C Program for the recertification survey completed on 2/18/20, showed a deficient practice cited at F695 related to the CPAP cleaning per the manufacturer's specifications. The POC included the a corrective action for the Health Information Director/Designee to conduct an audit on all CPAP orders to ensure proper placement on the MAR and weekly cleaning were conducted. Any findings will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the essential equipment was maintained in the safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure two glucometers (a device which measures the amount of sugar in the blood) currently used by two nonsampled residents (Residents 158 and 458) stored in the medication carts were properly calibrated. In addiition, the facility failed to ensure the glucometer monitoring log were completed. These posed the risk for inaccurate blood glucose test results and inappropriate treatments. * The facility failed to ensure there was no ice build up in the chest freezer in the kitchen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the microwave in the kitchen was free from corrosion, chipped paint, and rust. These failures had the potential for the equipment not functioning in the way they were intended and in turn could cause contamination of the food, leading to foodborne illnesses for the residents who received food from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-12-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner which promoted dignity and respect for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 65) reviewed for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter (flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 65's indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was inside the privacy bag. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 65's emotional well-being.Findings: On 12/3/25 at 0845 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 65 was observed lying in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter draining yellow urine into the urine collection bag. The urine collection bag was observed hanging on the right side of Resident 65's bed and not placed inside the privacy bag. On 12/3/25 at 0902 hours, an interview and concurrent observation was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 verified the above findings. LVN 1 stated the urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-12-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to protect the residents' identifiable information.* The facility's survey results binder for public viewing included four confidential resident rosters. This failure resulted in confidential resident information being accessible to the public.Findings: On 12/9/25 at 0737 hours, the Survey Inspection Results binder was observed in a wall pocket next to the Social Services office and was posted for public view. On 12/9/25 at 1035 hours, a review of the survey binder was completed. The binder included the Confidential Resident Rosters (a list which identified the names of the residents by their identifiers given for surveys to protect the residents' identities) for the following surveys:- A Concurrent Relicensing and Recertification Survey roster dated 12/2 - 12/3/24, with five resident identifiers and their names. - An Abbreviated Survey dated 2/7/20, with six resident identifiers and their names. - An Abbreviated Survey dated 8/26/19, with two resident identifiers and their names. - A Recertification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-12-09 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment was coded accurately for one of three residents reviewed for closed records (Resident 6). * Resident 6's MDS assessment was not coded accurately to show he received hospice services. This failure posed the risk for the resident not to have an individualized plan of care based on the resident's specific needs, and incorrect data being transmitted to CMS. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) Guidelines revised 10/3/25, showed the MDS data will be used to guide care planning, monitoring resident outcomes, support facility quality improvement initiatives. Accuracy, timeliness, and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential to ensure compliance and optimal resident care. Closed medical record review for Resident 6 was initiated on 12/3/25. Resident 6 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 6's Physician's Orders showed an order dated 9/17/25, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive plan of care to reflect the individual care needs for two of 15 final sampled residents (Residents 35 and 41). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 41's use of the midodrine (blood pressure medication) medication. * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 35's midline catheter (long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a peripheral vein and advanced until the tip rests below the armpit) use. These failures had the potential risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to the residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 10/2025 showed all the residents will receive individualized person-centered care through comprehensive care plans that reflect their medical, psychological, and personal preferences. The care plans must include but are not limited to medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical information was complete and accurate for two of nine sampled residents (Residents 1 and 4). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's intake, output, and eating percentage documentation were complete and accurate. * The facility failed to document the incident when Resident 4 spilled hot tea on her left thigh on 9/3/24. These failures had the potential for the residents to receive inadequate care as their clinical information were incomplete and inaccurate.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised 7/2017 showed all the services provided to the resident, progress towards the care plan goals, or any changes in the residents mental, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the residents medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the residents condition and response to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 507) was assessed to determine if it was safe to self-administer their medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 507 had the physician's order and care plan developed prior to self-administering their medications. These failures had the potential for the unsafe medication administration and negatively impact the resident's physiological well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self Administration of Medications revised 11/28/16, showed the facility should comply with facility policy, applicable law, and the state operations manual with respect to the resident self-administration of the medications. The facility in conjunction with the IDT, should assess and determine, with respect to each of the resident, whether self-adminsitration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate, based on the resident's functionality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one nonsampled resident (Resident 307). This failure had the potential for Resident 307 not being able to summon help if needed and not receiving the care timely. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Answering the Call Lights dated October 2010 showed when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair in the room, be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. On 11/18/24 at 0900 hours, Resident 307 was observed awake and sitting up in a wheelchair. Resident 307's call light was observed on the floor. Medical record review of Resident 307 was initiated on 12/2/24. Resident 307 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 307's plan of care showed a care plan problem dated 11/26/24, addressing the resident's risk for bowel incontinence related to immobility and cognitive impairment. The interventions included assisting the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide and document in the medical record the information on how to formulate an advance directive for one of two final residents (Resident 508) reviewed for an advance directives. * Resident 508's responsible party had not been provided the information regarding their rights to formulate an advance directive. This failure had the potential for the facility to provide treatment and services against the resident's wishes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised 6/24/15, showed it is the policy to provide written information to the resident and their responsible party regarding their rights to formulate an advance directive. If the resident indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility will offer assistance in establishing advance directives. Medical record review for Resident 508 was initiated on 12/2/24. Resident 508 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) Form CMS-10055 for one of three residents (nonsample resident, Resident 44) reviewed for beneficiary notices. This failure had the potential to not allow Resident 44's responsible party to make an informed decision regarding their Medicare services. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Beneficiary Notice Guidelines dated 11/2024 showed the SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 is provided to residents or their responsible parties when the SNF determines the beneficiary no longer required daily skilled services and the resident remains in the facility regardless of payer type. Medical record review for Resident 44 was initiated on 12/2/24. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 44's medical record showed Resident 44's Medicare Part A skilled services benefits exhausted on 5/17/24. On 12/3/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS for discharge was completed and transmitted to CMS for two nonsampled residents (Residents 42 and 46) reviewed for resident assessments. This failure had the potential to affect the provision of care or services for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's guidelines titled CMS RAI Manual Version 3.0 Chapter 2: Assessments for the RAI revised Octorber 2024 showed under the section Discharge Assessment-Return Not Anticipated, assessments must be completed within 14 days after the discharge date and must be submitted within 14 days after the MDS completion date. 1. Closed medical record review for Resident 42 was initiated on 12/5/24. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged from the facilty on 7/3/24. Review of Resident 42's medical record failed to show a discharge MDS assessment was completed and transmitted. 2. Closed medical record review for Resident 46 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-12-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was properly stored in three of five garbage dumpsters. This failure had the potential to attract pests/rodents that carried diseases. Findings: According to the FDA Food Code 2022, 5-501.113, Covering Receptacles, receptacle and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be kept covered with tight-fitting lids or doors if kept outside the food establishment. Review of the facility's P&P titled Health Center Trash Removal dated 1/2015 showed the environmental services staff is responsible for all trash removal from the health center. When trash is transferred, it must be moved in trash bins that are covered. This is for infection control reasons. On 12/3/24 at 0920 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director. Three garbage dumpsters located outside of the facility were observed with trash overfilled, causing the lids to not be able to fully close. On 12/3/24 at 0925 hours, an interview was conducted with the EVS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-09-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CONTINUING LIFE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORE CARE V A CA LIMITED | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/17/1992 |
| CORECARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/17/1992 |
| MORNINGSIDE SP ASSOCIATES, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/17/1992 |
| SPIEKER 2010 IRRV CHILDRENS TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/10/2010 |
| SPIEKER, WARREN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/17/1992 |
| WILSON, ELWOOD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/17/1992 |
| CONTINUING LIFE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| ANDRAWES, HAIDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2018 |
| JORGENSEN-KARES, DAROLYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2013 |
| MORNINGSIDE CORECARE ASSOCIATES, LP | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 04/17/1992 |
| CORECARE II | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 04/17/1992 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555515. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.