Willow Pass Healthcare Center
3318 Willow Pass Road, Concord, CA 94519 · For profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (925) 689-9222 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,702 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-11)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.62 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 78.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise one of three residents (Resident 1) with a history of falls when, Resident 1 was not supervised and assisted to the bathroom. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a left hip fracture (broken bone), experiencing pain, and transferring to Acute Care Hospital 1 (ACH 1) for follow up care. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed on 4/25/24, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with dementia (memory loss), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking) and mobility, and abnormal posture. During a record review of Resident 1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.) assessment, dated 2/21/24, the MDS assessment indicated Resident 1 used a walker for mobility. The assessment also indicated Resident 1's need for supervision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents' right to be free from verbal and physical abuse when, Resident 2 yelled and punched Resident 1 in the face. Resident 1 sustained skin tear with flap (a traumatic wound that is caused by direct contact between the skin and another object) during an altercation in the courtyard. This failure resulted in Resident 1's increased anger and fear for his safety at the facility from Resident 2. Findings: Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool used to guide care), dated 3/26/24, indicated. Resident 1 had clear speech, able to express his ideas and wants, made self-understood and understood others. Resident 1 had no physical or verbal behavioral symptoms such as hitting, kicking, pushing, screaming, cursing, and threatening others. Resident 1 used wheelchair for mobility. Resident 1's diagnosis included depression and quadriplegia (a form of paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one (Resident 1) of the six sampled residents from verbal abuse. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) used profanity (irrelevant language and behavior that shows disrespect, used to express anger and frustration), raised his voice, yelled/shouted at Resident 1, when Resident 1 asked CNA 1's help for Resident 2 when Resident 2 was crying out for help in the TV dining area (a common area used for dining and to watch television). This failure resulted in Resident 1 crying and becoming visibly upset after the incident.During a record review of Resident 1's admission record, dated 2/10/26, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate a resident's functional capabilities, health needs, and clinical status), dated 3/6/26, the assessment indicated Resident 1 was able to express ideas and wants clearly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) from resident care areas for over three hours, after he had an altercation with Resident 1. CNA 1 used profanity (irrelevant language and behavior that shows disrespect, used to express anger and frustration), raised his voice, yelled/shouted at Resident 1 in front of other residents when Resident 1 asked CNA 1's help for Resident 2 when Resident 2 was crying out for help in the TV dining area (a common area used for dining and to watch television). CNA 1 continued to provide direct care to his nine (9) other assigned residents until end of his shift. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for further abuse and nine other assigned residents at risk for abuse/mistreatment from CNA 1.(Cross Reference F600)During a record review of Resident 1's admission record, dated 2/10/26, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-03-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent exploitation (taking advantage of a resident for personal gain, through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats, or coercion) of one of three sampled residents (Resident 3), when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, received a new pair of shoes bought by Resident 3 for CNA 1's personal use.This failure had the potential to cause Resident 3 to be taken advantage of resources, manipulation and abuse.During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), printed 3/11/26, the AR indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pain in the right knee.During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 1/23/26, the MDS indicated Resident 3's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Care Planning-IDT Care Planning Conference, policy and procedure when: Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-a professional discipline that works together to provide the greatest benefit to the resident which included the resident, the resident's family and/or representative, whenever possible, develops and implements approaches to care that are both clinically and appropriate and person-centered) did not develop a care plan that addressed Resident 1's refusal to shower for over a month with appropriate interventions. IDT did not develop a care plan that addressed Resident 1's discharge plan upon admission to the facility. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for poor hygiene, body odor, transmission of diseases and misunderstanding with discharge process. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed 3/11/26, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), was provided services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene when: Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) did not shave Resident 2's facial hair with showers as scheduled. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, body odor, infection, and transmission of diseases.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), printed 3/11/26, the AR indicated, Resident 2, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hip fracture. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 12/12/26, MDS indicated Resident 2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had one shared bathroom for male and female residents (Residents 1 and 2).This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling unsafe and made Residents 1 and 2 feeling they lacked privacy. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/8/2025 at 12:31 p.m., with Resident 1 (female) in the resident's room, Resident 1 stated she felt unsafe because she was sharing the bathroom with Resident 2 (male) and further stated there was no bathroom lock. On observation, Resident 1's room was situated beside a room for male residents and there was one shared bathroom inside the two rooms with no locks in the doors. Resident 1 further stated that Resident 2 had to raise his arm outside of the bathroom door so that she knew that Resident 2 was using the bathroom. Stated she was not sure if it was okay for female residents to share bathrooms with male residents. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool) dated 6/5/25, indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents' (Resident 1 and Resident 3) rooms were maintained in a comfortable and safe temperature level when Resident 1 and 3's room air temperature was at 84 degrees Fahrenheit during a heat wave. This failure had the potential to cause overheating in residents and discomfort during severe hot weather. Findings: During a facility tour on 7/3/24 at 12:06 p.m., with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the air temperature in Resident 1's room was 84 degrees Fahrenheit. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - Resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 6/11/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) score was 15 and indicated intact mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0918 — isolatedProvide a bathroom in or located near each resident’s room.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) a functioning toilet that can be accessed quickly, when Resident 1 needed to use the toilet, but her bathroom was Out-of-Order and she did not have a bedside commode. This failure potentially resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall while looking for an alternate bathroom, resulting in left hip fracture (broken bone), pain, and transfer to Acute Care Hospital (ACH 1) for follow up care. (Cross reference F689) Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record printed on 4/25/24, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with dementia (memory loss), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking) and mobility, and abnormal posture. During a record review of Resident 1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) right to privacy when the licensed social worker (SW) discussed Resident 1 ' s personal care with Resident 1 ' s family without Resident 1 ' s consent. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s facility admission Record on 2/7/2024 at 11:15 a.m., the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in July 2022 with a diagnosis of muscle weakness. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 was his own responsible party. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.) indicated Resident 1 was alert and oriented to the day, year, month and could recall words presented to him. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 10:35 a.m., with the facility ' s Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the facility had wanted to deep clean Resident 1 ' s room, but Resident 1 often stayed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for Resident 1 to receive a consult with psychiatric (specialist in providing mental, emotional, medical or behavioral care) services were implemented. This failure resulted in the potential for Resident 1 to have compromised psychosocial well-being and at risk of another altercation with another resident. Findings: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that interferes with a person's ability to think clearly, manage emotions, make decisions, and relate to others). A review of Resident 1's behavior care plan initiated on 7/11/23, by the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated Resident 1 was at risk of having psychosocial well-being problems because of an encounter with another resident. The care plan indicated an intervention for Resident 1 to have a consult with psychiatric services. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control policies and procedures when: 1. staff did not answer COVID-19 screening questions before entering the facility; 2. Resident 14 and Resident 54's nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP, a machine used to deliver pressured air to lungs) mask were not bagged and touching the floor; 3. Resident 54's BiPAP mask had brown matter sticking to the mask; and 4. staff did not clean the morphine sulfate (MS- medication to relieve moderate to severe pain) solution re-usable syringe for Resident 377 after use. This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection. Findings: 1. During a concurrent record review and interview of the facility document, Willow Pass Healthcare Center Visitor Symptoms Screening Log with Infection Preventionist (IP) on 10/13/22, at 1:13 p.m., nocturnal shift staff were not screened before their shifts from 10/5/22 through 10/13/22. IP stated this document was for all visitors who entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment to three of three sampled residents (Resident 14, 54, and 6) when 1. Resident 14 and Resident 54's standing/ table fans had visible dust, dirt and debris; and 2. Resident 6 had rodent droppings next to her beds for three days. These failures placed Residents 6, 14, 54 at risk for infection and loss of a homelike environment due to unclean and unsanitary conditions. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/22, at 10:30 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, Resident 6 and Resident 14's shared room was observed. Resident 6 had a black standing fan next to the bedside table directed towards her. Resident 6's fan had dust, dirt and white papery debris on the fan casing. Resident 14 had a large white colored square fan sitting on top of her bedside table pointed at her. Resident 14's fan had a thick dark brown layer of dust over the fan casing. CNA 1 stated the fans were personal belongings of Resident 6 and Resident 14 and she did not know…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (activities related to personal care including bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating) care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) who required extensive assistance when Resident 14's scheduled showers and bed baths were missed. This failure placed Resident 14 at risk for infection and skin breakdown. Findings: During a record review of Resident 14's admission Record, dated 10/10/22, the record indicated Resident 14 was originally admitted to the facility in 6/2022. During a record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to guide care) dated 7/04/22, it indicated Resident 14 was alert and able to make her needs known. The MDS assessment also indicated Resident 14 required one staff's extensive physical assistance for bathing and showers. During a review of Resident 14's Activities of Daily Living Care Plan, dated 6/27/22, the care plan indicated, the goal was to maintain or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policies and procedures for oxygen administration for two (Resident 14 and Resident 68) of four sampled residents receiving oxygen therapy when there was no sign outside of Resident 14 and Resident 68's room stating Oxygen in Use and when Resident 68 was receiving oxygen therapy without a doctors order. These deficient practices may result in placing all individuals in the facility at risk of potential harm in the event smoke or fire in the vicinity of the oxygen container and ineffective oxygen therapy for Resident 68. Findings: A review of Resident 68's admission Record, dated 10/11/22 indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heard doesn't pump blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 9/18/22 indicated Resident 68 receives oxygen therapy while a resident in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) and non-controlled medications when: 1. Random controlled medication use audits for five out of 5 residents (Residents 8, 14, 29, 45 and 63) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents; 2. An emergency kit (e-kit, a kit containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) containing oral medications had medication removed without the required documentation of the removal in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P); and 3. Medications for disposal were not rendered unusable, irretrievable, and were not securely stored when old, clear plastic beverage bottles with holes cut out were used for drug disposal in 2 of 2 medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 31.03% error rate when nine medication errors out of 29 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for four of eight residents (Residents 4, 22, 53 and 63). These failures resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and may affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 10/10/22, at 9:21 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 was observed preparing eight medications, including oyster shell calcium 500 milligrams (mg, a unit of measure) plus vitamin D 5 micrograms (mcg, a unit of measure) tablet, multivitamin with minerals, and losartan (medication to treat high blood pressure) 100 mg for Resident 53. A review of Resident 53's medical record indicated the following physician's orders: - Calcium 500 mg: 1 tablet two times a day, dated 4/21/16 - Multivitamin: 1 tablet one time a day, dated 8/24/18 - Losartan 100 mg: 1 tablet one time a day, hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure, a measurement of blood pressure) less…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: -Thirteen expired medications were not available for resident use; -Three medications were labeled properly with a pharmacy label to ensure it was used for the right resident; -Two multi-dose injectable insulin (medication to lower blood sugar level) products were dated with an open and discard date, to ensure they were not used beyond the discard date; -One medication had a legible expiration date; and -Six medications with discontinued physician's orders were removed from facility stock. The deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive the wrong medication or medications that were unsafe or with reduced potency from being used past their discard date. Findings: On 10/10/22 at 10:46 a.m., an inspection of the medication storage room and refrigerator with Infection Preventionist/Nurse Manager (IP/NM) identified and confirmed the following: - Expired medications: o 1 vial Tubersol (an injectable solution used to test for tuberculosis), expired 9/1/2022 o 1 container Tucks medicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a safe and sanitary manner when: 1. Expired food items were found in the dry storage room; 2. Multiple dry food items did not have a use by date or open date on them; 3. Food was left uncovered and unlabeled and undated in freezer; 4. Ice machine was not clean with brown residue; 5. Expired test strips were used for testing the sanitizer strength used to sanitize food contact surfaces; 6. A box of popcorn was leaking in the dry storage area; 7. There was no air gap (a gap of air between the floor and a drainpipe to prevent backflow of sewage into the equipment) for 3-part compartment sink; 8. Kitchen vents were dirty with black and brown residue; 9. Kitchen counters over the cooking range were dusty with black/brown residue; 10. Five frying pans used for cooking food were not in good condition; 11. Two cutting board was scratched and significantly worn out; and 12. Used face shields were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure self-administered medications kept at bedside for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 4) were reviewed and approved by the physician. This failure had the potential for unsafe medication use, exposure to unwanted side effects and duplication of therapy. Findings: During an observation on 10/10/22, at 10:14 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 was observed administering medications to Resident 4. To the left of Resident 4's bed was a nightstand, covered in personal items as well as an over-the-counter (OTC, medications available without prescription) lidocaine (a topical medication used to treat pain) 4% roll-on and a nighttime cold and flu syrup. Resident 4 asked LVN 1 to apply the lidocaine 4% roll-to her body and stated it was a medication the facility was not able to provide to her, so a family member had brought it to the facility for Resident 4. During an interview and record review on 10/10/22, at 1:25 p.m., with LVN 1, Resident 4's physician's orders were reviewed. LVN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one of one sampled resident (Resident 38) for oral/dental status on one annual and two quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment used to guide care) assessments when Resident 38's MDS assessment was coded No to Broken or loosely fitting partial or full dentures and Resident 38 was not able to wear dentures. This failure resulted in an inaccurate reflection of Resident 38's oral/dental status and not triggering the facility to develop and implement a care plan for Resident 38's ill-fitting dentures for nine consecutive months. Findings: During a record review of Resident 38's admission Record, dated 10/12/22, the record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 2018. During a record review of Resident 38's MDS Assessment, dated 8/8/22, the assessment indicated Resident 38 was cognitively intact, able to express herself, and able to make her needs known to others. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/22, at 8:41 a.m., Resident 38 was lying in bed without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 8) when the PASARR did not to reflect Resident 8's diagnosis of Anxiety (emotion we feel when we experience fear, nervousness, or a sense that something bad will happen), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and use of psychotropic medication (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior). This failure placed Resident 8 at risk to not receive care and services appropriate to her needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record Report printed on 10/13/22, it indicated Resident 8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/13/22, at 11:11 a.m., with the Registered Nurse (RN) 2, Resident 8's PASARR assessment was reviewed. RN 2 stated Resident 8's most recent PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and provide a written summary of a baseline care plan to one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) when Resident 14's baseline care plan was not developed within 48 hours of admission to the facility. This failure placed Resident 14 at risk of not receiving person-centered care and facility staff to be unaware of Resident 14's needs. Findings: During a record review of Resident 14's admission Record, dated 10/10/22, the record indicated Resident 14 was originally admitted to the facility 6/25/22 and readmitted on [DATE]. During an interview and record review with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) on 10/12/22, at 1:39 p.m., an untitled binder was reviewed. MDSC stated she was responsible for developing the baseline care plans and used the binder to keep the baseline care plans for all residents at the facility. MDSC stated the baseline care plans were arranged in alphabetical order of resident's names. MDSC then looked for Resident 14's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one (Resident 126) of two residents receiving enteral feeding (a way of delivering nutrition directly to your stomach or small intestine) when staff did not label and date Resident 126's enteral bottle and tubing. This deficient practice may result in a risk for contamination. Findings: A review of the document titled, admission Record, dated 10/12/22 indicated Resident 126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing). A review of the document titled, Order Summary Report, indicated a doctors order on 10/8/22 for Resident 126 for continuous enteral feeding of Jevity (a therapeutic nutrition for tube feeding) 1.0 at 50 cc/hour via pump. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/22 at 10:35 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Resident 126 was observed receiving feeding from an enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate renal (kidney) dialysis (therapy used to remove waste and extra chemicals and fluid from your blood) documentation and dialysis food preferences were provided for one of one sampled resident (Resident 65) with end stage renal disease (kidneys are no longer able to work as they should to your body's needs) when 1. Resident 65's renal dialysis access site was documented on the incorrect arm; 2. Resident 65 was not provided snacks during dialysis days; and 3. Resident 65 was not assessed before and after dialysis for various dates. This failure resulted in Resident 65's inaccurate pre- and post-dialysis assessments, Resident 65 feeling very hungry after dialysis, and the potential for unmet needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, dated 10/14/22, indicated Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal (kidney) disease dependence on renal dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 32) receiving anticoagulation medication (medication to thin blood) was free from unnecessary medication when staff did not monitor the side effects of Resident 32's use of eliquis (medication used to thin blood). This failure had the potential to result in side effects of the medication to go unnoticed. Findings: A review of Residents 32's admission Record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture) and history of venous thrombosis (a blood clot in a deep vein of the leg, pelvis and sometimes arm) and embolism (obstruction of an artery, typically by a clot of blood or an air bubble). A review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool to guide care) dated 7/28/22 indicated Resident 32 received anticoagulant medication. A review of Resident 32's Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided for one of one sampled resident (Resident 38) when Resident 38's upper and lower dentures were loosely fitted, needed realignment and Resident 38 was not able to wear dentures for nine consecutive months. This failure resulted in Resident 38 to not receive timely dental care, be able to wear lower dentures, and develop oral sores on the roof of their mouth. (Cross-reference F 641) Findings: During a record review of Resident 38's admission Record dated 10/12/22, the record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility in 2018. During a record review of Resident 38's MDS Assessment, dated 8/8/22, the assessment indicated Resident 38 was cognitively intact, able to express herself, and able to make her needs known to others. During an observation and interview on 10/10/22, at 8:41 a.m., Resident 38 was lying in bed without lower teeth or dentures. Resident 38 stated I have dentures, the lower ones do not fit anymore, and the upper dentures partially fit and are causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 38)'s medical record reflected accurate meal intake when Resident 38's meal intake was documented but was not served breakfast and lunch. This failure resulted in an inaccurate reflection of Resident 38's meal intake. Findings: During an observation on 10/10/22, at 9:00 a.m., Resident 38 was lying in bed. Resident 38 stated I do not eat breakfast, I only eat lunch and dinner, every day. During multiple observations between 8:30 a.m. and 12:05 p.m., on 10/12/22, Resident 38 was not served any breakfast or lunch. During a concurrent interview and record review with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 on 10/12/22, at 12:00 p.m., Resident 38's electronic health record for Nutrition - Amount Eaten was reviewed. CNA 2 stated she was the assigned CNA for Resident 38 on 10/12/22. CNA 2 stated she served breakfast and had already served lunch to Resident 38. CNA 2 also stated Resident 38 ate about 51-75 % breakfast at 10:51 a.m., and 51-75% lunch at 11:07 a.m. on 10/12/22.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
5. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/20, at 12:38 p.m., with CNA 2 at Station 1, CNA 2 was seen removing a dirty meal tray from a resident's room and placing it inside a meal conveyor cart with the clean meal trays that were being served to residents in their rooms. CNA 2 stated, It is an infection and contamination issue. 6. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/20, at 1:42 p.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), of the ice machine located at Station 1, the ice machine had a pinkish, blackish substance inside the ice bin. The DS stated, This is dirty, I will tell the administrator. During an interview on 2/4/20 at 1:44 p.m., with the Administrator (ADM) and the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated he cleaned the ice machine monthly and the manufacturer's representative came every six months for maintenance. ADM admitted the ice machine was dirty and stated he will monitor and increase the cleaning schedule for the ice machine. During a review of the facility and manufacturer's ice machine cleaning schedule, the schedule indicated the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the privacy and dignity of two of 22 sampled residents (Residents 45 and 71) was protected when urinary drainage bags were left uncovered and visible to other residents, as well as visitors. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the emotional well-being of the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 12/28/19, indicated Resident 45 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool used to assess mental function) score of 8, meaning Resident 45 was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS also indicated Resident 45 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder into a bag outside the body). During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/20, at 12:50 p.m., with Registered Nurse 2 (RN 2), Resident 45 was observed asleep in his bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]-B, and his urinary drainage bag was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 11 and 36) with limited range of motion were able to notify staff they required assistance when the call lights for Residents 11 and 36 were not within reach. This failure had the potential for both residents to have unmet physical, medical, and psychological needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 11/4/19, the MDS indicated Resident 11 required extensive assistance of at least one staff member with bed mobility, transferring from one surface to another, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The MDS also indicated Resident 11's Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool used to assess mental function) score was 00, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. During an observation on 2/3/20 at 9:58 a.m., Resident 11 was observed laying in her bed, waiving her hand and pointing to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond in a timely manner to concerns brought up by Resident Council members (Residents 8, 16, 21, 42, 47, 64, 71, and 74). This failure resulted in residents' concerns not being addressed or followed up on. Findings: During an interview with members of the Resident Council on 2/4/20 at 10 a.m., Residents 8, 16, 21, 42, 47, 64, 71, and 74 indicated the administrator listens to their concerns but does not follow through and do anything about their concerns. During a review of Resident Council minutes, dated 6/27/19, the minutes indicated residents question the purpose of Resident Council meetings when no changes were made. During a review of Resident Council minutes, dated 9/26/19, the minutes indicated the need to fix dry rot and water damage to the front dining room floor. During an observation on 2/4/20, at 10:48 a.m., of an area of the front dining room floor approximately 2 feet by 1 foot showed a floor board missing and other floor boards lifting up and not flush with the floor and containing dark…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care with dignity for one of one sampled residents (Resident 5) when Certified Nurse Assistant 7 (CNA 7) did not cover Resident 5 completely when transporting him down the hall after showering. This failure resulted in Resident 5 feeling embarrassed that his back-side was exposed for everyone to see. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, dated 2/3/20, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a slight paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) due to a cerebrovascular accident (a stroke), and legal blindness. During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 10/25/19, indicated Resident 5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool used to assess mental function) score of 15, meaning the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 5 required extensive assistance from at least one staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label medications when: 1. Six of 30 house supply medications did not have the date they were opened written on the bottles; and 2. One of one intravenous (IV, given in a vein) antibiotic that had been mixed in a bag of normal saline (a combination of salt and water) did not have an expiration date written on the bag. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving old or expired medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/20, at 10:25 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), six of 30 house supply medications, on one of four medication carts, did not have the date they were opened written on their bottles. LVN 2 stated all house supply medications are good until their expiration date. During an interview on 2/5/20, at 1:53 p.m., with Registered Nurse 2 (RN 2), RN 2 stated they only need to write the date the medication was opened on liquid medications, eye drops, insulin, and inhalers because they expire after 28 days of being opened. RN 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices when: 1. The Dietary Supervisor's (DS) hair was not totally covered by her hairnet while she was in the food preparation area. 2. There were two 3-gallon containers of sherbet in the freezer that had been opened and were not completely covered. 3. There was one 4-ounce (oz, a unit of measurement) tub of cream cheese in the walk-in refrigerator that had the aluminum seal pulled opened with no 'opened on' date recorded and had fluid build up on the surface of the cream cheese. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses throughout the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/20, at 8:30 a.m., with the DS, in the kitchen, the DS was wearing a hairnet that only covered the crown and back of her head, with her bangs extending out uncovered on her forehead. DS stated, Oh, my bangs. I should cover it. The DS pulled the hairnet forward, but her hair was not completely contained in the hairnet. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 177) when Resident 177's fall care plan did not include nursing interventions. This failure had the potential for Resident 177 to receive inconsistent care and not reach desired outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 177's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 177 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including Parkinson's disease (a disease of the central nervous system that produces progressive movement disorders and changes in cognition and mood) and was at high risk for fall with a fall risk score of 75 on the Morse Fall Scale assessment done on admission. During a review of Resident 177's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 1/30/20, the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool used to assess mental function) score was 11, meaning the resident is mildly cognitively impaired. During an interview on 2/3/20, at 8:45 a.m., with Resident 177,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including assistance with personal hygiene (grooming, combing hair, nail care, oral care), to one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 8) when the resident's nail care was neglected. This failure resulted in Resident 8 having long, chipped, fingernails. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility for long term care and had multiple diagnoses, including chronic kidney disease, high blood pressure, dementia, and venous thrombosis and embolism (a condition where a blood clot forms, most often in the deep veins of the leg or groin and travels in the circulation, lodging in the lungs). During a review of Resident 8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 11/3/19, indicated Resident 8 needed extensive assistance from at least one staff member with her personal grooming. The MDS also indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 54) received care to prevent pressure ulcers (PU, injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) when the staff did not identify a newly developed pressure ulcer on his tailbone. This failure resulted in the delay in the initiation of appropriate treatment and could result in worsening of the pressure ulcer. Findings: During a review of Resident 54's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 12/14/19, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool used to assess mental function) score was 15, meaning Resident 54 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident 54 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and that Resident 54 needed extensive assistant from at least one staff member for bed mobility, transferring from one surface to another, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 54's medical record, the medical record contained a Braden Scale form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for oxygen (O2) administration for one of four sampled residents (Resident 68), when Resident 68's O2 flow rate was not at the specific ordered rate. This failure had the potential to result in adverse effects for Resident 68 due to O2 toxicity. Findings: During a review of Resident 68's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 68 was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a progressive lung disease encompassing emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and non-reversible asthma) and acute and chronic respiratory failure. During a review of Resident 68's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 1/15/20, the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a tool used to assess mental function) score was 15, meaning Resident 68 was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 68 required O2 therapy. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the correct amount of liquid morphine sulfate (a narcotic medication used to treat moderate to severe pain). This failure resulted in 2 milliliters (ml, a unit of measurement) of liquid morphine sulfate for which the facility could not account. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 2/3/20, at 11:15 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), a medication cart with a bottle of morphine was observed. Inspection of the morphine sulfate label dated 10/13/19 showed the medication was prescribed for Resident 69 and contained 10 ml (volume) of liquid, at a concentration of 20 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement) of morphine sulfate per ml of liquid. Using the scale on the side of the bottle, further inspection showed 8 ml of liquid remaining in the bottle. A review of the complete narcotic record for Resident 69's morphine sulfate showed that on 12/24/19 there was 8 ml of liquid morphine sulfate in the bottle. LVN 1 was unable to provide documentation accounting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to provide functional environment when there was no towel hook in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure resulted in residents not having a towel readily available to dry off after showering. Findings: During an interview on 2/6/20, at 4 p.m., with a Family Member (FM), FM stated she helps with her mother's shower in the evenings but has a difficult time because there is no place to hang a towel in the shower room (room [ROOM NUMBER]). FM stated she brought it to the Administrator's (ADM) attention 10 months ago, but nothing has changed. During an observation on 2/7/20, at 10:15 a.m., of Shower room [ROOM NUMBER], no hook was present on the back of the door and the only place to put a towel was on the grab bar where it would get wet. During an interview on 2/7/20, at 10:12 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant 9 (CNA 9), CNA 9 indicated she does not like to use the shower in room [ROOM NUMBER] because there is no place to hang a towel. All the other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-01-09 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly psychosocial assessments on seven (Residents 11, 21, 22, 40, 52, 54, 56) of 38 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to cause residents not to have their medical and/or psychosocial needs met. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct health care needs) dated 10/5/18 showed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a condition when the body does not produce enough insulin). Resident 11 also wore corrective lens. During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/7/19 at 10:40 a.m., Resident 11 was sitting up in bed wearing glasses and holding a piece of paper close to her eyes. Resident 11 stated she needed new glasses because she could not see clearly with the glasses she was wearing. Review of Resident 11's medical record showed no social services assessment for the quarterly assessments due for 1/2/18,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-01-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide three (Residents 11, 21, 22) of 38 sampled residents with medically-related social services. These failures resulted in Resident 11 not receiving adequate visual aid, Resident 21 not receiving dental services as recommended, and Resident 22 not receiving supportive mental health services. This placed all three residents at risk for not meeting their highest practicable well-being. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct health care needs) dated 10/5/18 showed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM - a condition when the body does not produce enough insulin). Resident 11 also required the use of glasses for visual aid. During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/7/19 at 10:40 a.m., Resident 11 was sitting up in her bed wearing glasses. Resident 11 was holding a piece of paper close to her eyes. Resident 11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-09 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an assessment of one (Resident 22) of 38 sampled residents after a significant change in condition occurred. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 22 not receiving the appropriate mental health services. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct health care needs) for Resident 22 dated 10/25/18 showed Resident 22 was re-admitted to the facility with a Significant Change In Condition on 10/18/18 with multiple diagnoses which included Schizophrenia (a mental disorder) and delirium (a state of confusion). Review of Resident 22's MDS dated [DATE] showed an unplanned discharge to an acute care hospital setting on 10/15/18. Review of Resident 22's medical record showed, Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary, dated 10/16/18 at 2:16 p.m., Sent to the acute care hospital for behavior evaluation of psychosis, schizophrenia and PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder - a trauma and stress disorder usually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for one (Resident 22) of 38 sampled residents upon admission to the facility. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 22 not receiving the appropriate psychosocial services. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct health care needs) dated 10/25/18 showed Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia (a mental disorder). Review of the History and Physical from the acute care hospital physician dated 4/26/18 showed Resident 22 had Schizophrenia. Review of Resident 22's medical record dated for 4/20/18 showed that a Level 1 PASRR screen indicated the need for Level II evaluation (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level II - done to assess mental health care needs and intellectually developmental care needs; Level II indicating that the resident requires an evaluation of what those services would be) was needed. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-10-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan included a pest control plan, when the facility had rats in the facility for three months. This failure had the potential for rats to continue to be present in the facility and to spread bacteria and/or disease. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator (ADM), on 10/14/22 at 10:34 a.m., the ADM stated the facility found rats in the facility for the last two to three months. The ADM stated the facility contracted with a new pest control company in August 2022 because previous company Terminex did not come right away when called so we now have Orkin company that comes right away. The ADM stated the QAPI committee tracked the pest control plan daily, monthly, and quarterly during QAPI meetings and upcoming meeting was 10/18/22, but could not provide documentation. ADM stated pest control was a serious issue because it may potentially affect health issues to residents. The ADM stated the pest control company set up different rat traps on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility had 21 resident rooms (room numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21) with a total of 65 beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each of the residents in each room, or for storage of resident belongings. Findings: During an interview on 10/10/22 at 2:30 p.m., the Administrator informed the survey Team Coordinator that facility had a waiver in place and provided an updated waiver request letter to California Department of Public Health, dated 10/10/22. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/13/22 at 9:00 a.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS identified the following resident rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft.) per bed were identified: Room Activity Room Size Floor Area 1 Resident Room 222.19 sq.ft. 74 sq.ft./bed 2 Resident Room 221 sq.ft. 74 sq.ft./bed 3 Resident Room 221 sq.ft. 74 sq.ft./bed 4 Resident Room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2020-02-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had 21 resident rooms (room numbers 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140) with a total of 65 beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident who occupied these rooms. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and for the lack of sufficient space for storage of resident belongings. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/5/20 at 9:50 a.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS identified the following resident rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft.): room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 222.19 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 74 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 221 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 74 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 221 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 74 sq. ft. of space per resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-01-09 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had 21 resident rooms (room numbers 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140) with a total of 65 beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq.ft.) per resident who occupied these rooms. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and for the lack of sufficient space for storage of resident belongings. Findings: During an observation on 01/08/19 at 8:14 a.m., with the Physical Plant Manager (PPM), the following resident rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft.) were identified: room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 222.19 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 74 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 221 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 74 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 221 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 74 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,702 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $45,702 — penalty dated 2024-04-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-03 for 27 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRATAP PODDATOORI — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PODDATOORI, PRATAP | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 05/13/2001 |
| HYCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/07/2006 |
| ACOSTA, MA JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/02/2021 |
| ANDRES, NORMA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2004 |
| ANTONIO, JOY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2024 |
| DHUGGA, GURPREET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/10/2016 |
| DOMINGUEZ, JUAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/22/2024 |
| EPHREM, BINOY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| GAUTAM, DAKSHINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2024 |
| GRIFFEN, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/12/2024 |
| GUERRERO, SYLVIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2022 |
| HUDSON, CASSI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/31/2023 |
| MCCLENDON, BREYANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/22/2024 |
| MCGREGOR, TERRANCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2003 |
| PADANIA, HILDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/16/2025 |
| PATEL, SAMIR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/30/2024 |
| WESSER-SINGH, SHALENA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2025 |
| WONG, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/07/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055241. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-10-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.