Jones Convalescent Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 25 beds and averages 23.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-01-25 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comply with the Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when: a. the facility did not have a full-time dietitian or a full-time dietetic service supervisor. b. dietary staff did not have competencies and training to carry out to carry out Food and Nutrition Services in a safe and sanitary manner. The lack of a full-time, competent supervisor resulted in Food and Nutrition Services staff not having adequate training and knowledge to carry out Food and Nutrition Services in a safe and sanitary manner placed 23 residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses (illnesses caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, and toxins) and/or malnutrition. Findings: a. During the initial kitchen observation and interview on 1/22/24 at 10:13 a.m., accompanied by [NAME] (CK) 1 and CK 2, CK 2 stated, Food and Nutrition Services Director (FNSD) works three days per week. CK 2 also stated, there was no manager to check kitchen when FNSD was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions when: - stainless steel waste can was dirty; - kitchen floor tiles were dirty; - staff did not adequately check for chemical sanitation of dishwashing machine; - plate warmer was dirty; - plates inside plate warmer was dirty; - pair of thermal gloves was dirty; - moldy and unusable foods were not discarded; - food items stored in the refrigerator was unlabeled; - mounted can opener was dirty; - multiple dented cans were stored; - staff did not follow hand hygiene practices; - ice machine was dirty. These failures placed the facility's 23 residents who received food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings: During initial observation of the kitchen on 1/22/23 at 10:13 a.m. accompanied by [NAME] (CK) 1 and CK 2, showed the following: (a) Stainless-steel waste can next to refrigerator was dirty, half-filled and had no plastic lining to hold kitchen waste materials; (b) kitchen floor tiles had multiple thick-sticky black spots; (c) staff did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure that all expired or outdated medications were available for administration to 2 sampled residents (2 and 3) of the facility's 19 sampled residents. 2) Ensure that medications which had been discontinued by the resident's physicians, were no longer available for administration to 1 sampled resident (19) and 1 unsampled resident 1, of the facility's 19 sampled residents. 3) Ensure that medications were available for all residents, as needed, including medications which had been prescribed for unsampled resident 2. 4) Ensure that all medications had been administered as ordered by each resident's physician (Resident 3 and 22). These failures had the potential to put the residents who may have received these medications at risk for medication errors and the potential for harm. Findings: 1) Inspection of the hospital's medication cart on [DATE] at 12:00 pm with the facility's Director of Nurses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly stored in dumpster when the left lid cover of one dumpster was left open. This failure had the potential for pest infestations and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/23/24 at 2:35 p.m. with Environmental Services Director (ESD), accompanied by the Facility Manager (FM), one large garbage dumpster in the rear building was left open. ESD attempted to close the open lid. However, the lid was damaged on the side and did not securely cover the dumpster. ESD acknowledged this was broken and had potential to attract rodents and pests. FM stated, she will contact waste management for lid replacement. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Waste Disposal dated, January 2012, indicated under policy statement, All infectious and regulated waste shall be handled and disposed of in a safe and appropriate manner.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 10 residents (Resident 5) was treated with respect, dignity, individuality in environment that promotes and enhances the quality of life when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 stood over Resident 5 while assisting her with feeding. This failure had the potential to deny Resident 5 dignity, respect, and individuality. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, dated 1/24/24, it indicated, Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility in 2019 and was readmitted in 2020. The admission record revealed, Resident 5 had multiple diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (group of conditions characterized by impairment in thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Parkinson's Disease (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements) and altered mental status. During an observation on 1/24/24 at 12:23 p.m., CNA 1 stood over Resident 5's left side and fed her. During an interview on 1/24/24 at 12:41 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with facility Nursing and Administrative staff, the facility failed to ensure that 1 sampled resident (10) out of 19 sampled residents had her needs accommodated while using her own wheelchair. This failure resulted in this resident not having a wheelchair which did not accommodate this resident's needs and preferences, which had the potential to result in decline and resident harm. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 1/23/2024 at 9:30 am, Resident 10 was observed being administered her morning medications while sitting in her wheelchair. The who has multiple contractures (validated by facility administrative staff interview), had been sitting in her wheelchair with her neck, head and back not supported in any way. The resident's wheelchair had been made to tilt backwards, but the resident's back, neck, and head were not touching the wheelchair's back, and this appeared to be very uncomfortable for the resident who had been using her own strength to hold her body up in this wheelchair. The resident's wheelchair had been missing a head…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review for 2 (Resident 11 and 22,) of 19 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 11 and 22 had received Restorative Nursing Assistance (RNA) treatments as ordered by the resident's physician. This failure had the potential to result in this resident's decline, which could result in the resident's decrease in muscle strength, decreased range of motion, contractures, and possible decline in function. Findings 1: Review of Resident 22's medical record on 1/25/2024 at 8:50 am revealed that this resident had a physician's order for Restorative Nursing Assistance (RNA). The physician order which had been written on 12/15/2023 read: RNA program every day (QD) 3 times per week for 90 days for (bilateral upper extremities) BUE (active assisted range of motion) AAROM as tolerated to maintain current level of function (CLOF). Further review of Resident 22's medical record revealed that this resident had not received treatment from the RNA program between 12/15/2023 and 1/23/2024, which resulted in this resident not receiving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the correct serving size to one Resident for a census of 23 (Resident 13). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 13 not receiving the appropriate diet portions to meet each individual needs. Findings: During a concurrent tray line observation and interview on 1/22/24, at 12:15 p.m., with [NAME] (CK) 1, CK 1 used a number 8 scoop to a tray of regular texture beef enchiladas, black beans, and cilantro lime rice to serve Resident 13. CK 1 stated, she was aware Resident 13 required small portion servings but did not follow what was on Resident 13's diet card. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/22/24, at 3:42 p.m., with Food and Nutrition Services Director (FNSD), FNSD was asked why it was the important for CK 1 to follow small portion servings for Resident 13. FNSD stated, I don't know why it's important, do I have to know that . During a concurrent interview and document review on 1/25/24 at 11:01 a.m. with Registered Dietician (RD), RD confirmed Resident 13's diet card servings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two of 14 sampled Residents (Resident 11 and 19). This failure had the potential to make Residents 11 and 19 feel depressed. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, dated 1/23/24, the record indicated Resident 11 was admitted 4/2023 with multiple diagnosis that included acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that once brought joy). During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 1/5/24, the MDS indicated Resident 11's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored appropriately when: 1. Expired medications were stored in the medication cart and medication refrigerator. 2. Expired emergency kit (e-kit, a kit that contain a small quantity of medications that can be dispensed when pharmacy services are not available) were not replaced. 3. Temperature logs for the medication refrigerator were incomplete and there was no thermometer and temperature log for the medication room and the storage shed. 4. A bottle of Acidophilus (supplement to help restore the normal balance of intestinal bacteria) and a bottle of Lorazepam (a psychotropic medicine used to treat anxiety) was not stored in the refrigerator. 5. Food items were stored in the medication refrigerator. 6. A Humalog pen (medication used to treat diabetes) had no name and date opened on it. This failure had the potential for expired medications and less potent medication to be administered to all the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRATAP PODDATOORI — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $568K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA