No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ahmc Seton Medical Center

1900 Sullivan Avenue, Daly City, CA 94015 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 186 certified beds · (650) 991-6767 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (650) 991-6767 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0758)7 actual-harm citations$41,019 in federal fines3 Medicare payment denials
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 7 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $41,019 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-15)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
455 Hickey Blvd Ste 310 Lbby B · (650) 985-7500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1800 Sullivan Ave · (650) 756-1800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2945 Junipero Serra Blvd
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
55 San Fernando Way · (650) 991-4673

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.7%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.5%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.7%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.8%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.7%12.0%17.1%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.37
RN hours/ resident / day
1.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.16
RN hoursweekends
34.1%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 186 beds and averages 99.2 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 87 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.37 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.95 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.45 to 1.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the 26 sampled residents (Resident 97) bed/side rail was raised up while the resident was in bed. This failure resulted in Resident 97 falling out of bed and sustain a fracture (broken bone) through the right femur (thigh bone).During an observation on 8/11/25, at 10:04 AM, Resident 97 was asleep in bed. The right and left upper bed/side rails were raised.During an interview on 8/13/25, at 10:08 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 4 stated that the bed/side rails were raised up when Resident 97 is in bed for positioning. RN 4 further stated Resident 97 leans to one side. A review of the facility's Informed Consent for Bedrail Use - Facility verification Form indicated the consent was obtained on 6/29/23.A review of the care plan with a start date of 6/30/23, indicated Resident 97 was at risk for fall or injury. The care plan interventions to address fall or injury included having the bed / side rails up when the resident is in bed and to anticipate resident's needs. A review of the Minimum Data Set (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, four problems were identified regarding the facility's fall prevention program: 1. The facility did not regularly conduct a thorough investigation regarding the primary causes of falls for Resident 1. 2. The facility did not conduct a fall risk assessment for two of Resident 1's falls. 3. The facility continued using a tab alarm (an alarm that clips onto a resident's clothing) to alert staff for unassisted transfers for Resident 1 who has a history of unclipping the tab alarm from her clothing. The facility did not evaluate if a tab alarm was appropriate for Resident1 in decreasing her fall risks. 4. Staff did not consistently implement interventions within Resident 1 's care plans to minimize fall risks for Resident 1 (application of tab alarm or activation of bed alarm). These failures resulted in four falls for Resident 1, one of two sample residents within four months (April to August 2024). On 08/05/2024, Resident 1 fell and fractured all five of her right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer (PU) for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 22) when interventions were not implemented to avoid skin breakdown for Resident 22. This deficient practice resulted in the development of Stage 2 PU for Resident 22. Definition/Stages for Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury (also called a bed sore, is an injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin. Stage I: Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable redness (non-blanchable: redness persists and does not fade or turn white after removal of fingertip pressure). Stage II: Partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed upper skin layer. The wound bed is pink. May also present as an intact or ruptured blister. Fat tissue and deeper tissues (muscle, tendons, bone) are not visible. Findings: Resident 22 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (complete paralysis on one side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of eight sampled residents (Residents 409, 70, and 86) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when the facility did not ensure: 1.Resident 409 a. was free from side effects due to the use of Haldol. Haldol is an anti-psychotic drug used to treat symptoms of psychosis. Symptoms of psychosis includes hallucinations (perceiving sights, sounds, smells, tastes, or touches that are not real), delusions (false beliefs), and dementia (loss of the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve problems). b. Aggressive behaviors were managed via non-medication means such as modifying smoking rules. c. Haldol dosage was not lowered for 96 days when side effects were first identified. 2. Resident 70 a. there was no clinical indication for the use of Citalopram (an antidepressant drug). b. order for Ativan (also known as lorazepam, a medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, comfortable and homelike environment when: 1. The linoleum flooring in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom were torn, cracked, and peeling off around the base of the toilet exposing the subfloor and had a pungent musty odor. 2. 20 of 41 resident bathroom flooring (Rooms 101, 105, 111, 201, 206, 208, 301, 302, 305, 306, 308, 309, 310, 311, 401, 403, 406, 407, 408 and 410) were damaged and discolored. 3. There was an evidence of stagnant, dark colored liquid in the shower room (number) 3 with pungent musty odor on the missing tiles. The pungent musty odor had caused Resident 91 to feel sick and want to throw up. In addition, exposure to unpleasant odor, unsanitary, unkempt, and uncomfortable environment could affect mood, anxiety and stress level of other residents, staff, families, and visitors in the facility. Findings: 1. During the initial tour, on 2/7/22, at 9:58 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 91 was sitting on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident comfort is achieved in accordance with comprehensive person-centered care plan when physician's order of No turning on Right Side was not implemented for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 33). The deficient practice resulted in Resident 33 having a headache and discomfort, and had the potential to cause further brain tissue injury and increase intracranial pressure (pressure inside the skull). Findings: Review of Resident 33's History and Physical Report dated 12/13/21, indicated, Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: i. Right-sided hemorrhagic stroke (a condition in which a blood vessel breaks and bleeds into the brain), ii. Right hemicraniectomy on 6/26/19 (a surgical procedure where a large flap of the skull is removed to give space for the swollen brain to bulge and reduces the intracranial pressure), iii. Seizure (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide preventative treatment, equipment, and services to maintain, improve, and prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM) and/or mobility when: 1. The physician's order for hand splint and rolled bath blanket at lumbar spine were not implemented for Resident 33. The deficient practice resulted in pain, further increase in contractures, and decline in ROM for Resident 33. A contracture is a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendon or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints which limit and interfere with daily functioning. 2. The Physical Therapist (PT) recommendation to ambulate with staff supervision was not implemented for Resident 46. The deficient practice could potentially contributed to Resident 46's decline in range of motion, mobility and pressure injuries on left and right foot. 3. The physician's order for hand splint was not implemented for Resident 44. The deficient practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Interim Dietary Director (IDD), who is also a registered dietitian and oversees the kitchen, was fully sufficient when she did not ensure that auditing of the dish machine logs and cooling (Cooling is the specific method and guideline used to rapidly lower the temperature of cooked food to a safe storage level, preventing bacterial growth. Improper cooling is a major factor in causing foodborne illness. Taking too long to chill potentially hazardous food, which means food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens, has been consistently identified as one factor contributing to foodborne illness. Foods that have been cooked and held at improper temperatures promote the growth of disease-causing microorganisms that may have survived the cooking process (e.g., spore-formers). Cooked potentially hazardous foods that are subject to time and temperature control for safety are best cooled rapidly within 2 hours, from 135 F to 70 F, and within 4 more hours to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure governing body oversight of the facility's Quality Assurance Program (QAPI) program and activities when plan of action to correct identified deficiencies were not implemented and maintained. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the care and services rendered to the residents, including their quality of life. Review of the facility's QAPI Meeting Minutes from September 2025 to November 2025 indicated, .Continue with POC (plan of correction) . The QAPI Meeting Minutes did not show any oversight of how the plan of action was being implemented to address the identified deficiencies. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 4:40 PM, Chief Clinical & Quality Officer (CCQO) stated that the Director of Nursing (DON) and Manager of the Subacute were responsible for the implementation of the plan of correction. During an interview on 12/11/25 at 11:37 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 2 stated that the staff were not made aware of the facility's approved plan of correction thus, they did not know what needs to be implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify on-going systemic issues, develop, implement, and evaluate its plan of action to correct the identified deficiencies when:The facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident involving Resident J within the required 2-hour timeframe. Additionally, the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation of the alleged abuse incident. (Cross reference to F609 and F610)The facility failed to report the results of investigation within five (5) working days of the incident for two reported abuse allegations involving Resident J, Resident L, and Resident M. (Cross reference to F609)The facility failed to evaluate, develop, and implement interventions after Resident A was identified with a significant weight loss. (Cross reference to F656 and F692)The facility did not ensure valid copy of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a written medical order that assists people in making decisions about medical treatment and life saving measures during end-of-life care or medical crisis) for Resident 5 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage in the kitchen when: 1. Multiple small packs of butter in a black container in the kitchen refrigerator had no expiration dates.2. Multiple small packs of butter in a stainless-steel container in the kitchen refrigerator were expired.3. The freezer temperature for the ice cream in the kitchen was out of range. 4. Six packs of MY OWN MEAL FLORENTINE LASAGNA in the kitchen storage room were expired. 5. The dish machine temperature log indicated the final rinse temperature was below 180 F (degrees Fahrenheit, a scale for measuring temperature) for multiple days in June and August 2025.6. The dish machine temperature was not checked for multiple days in June 2025. 7. The cooling log indicated, the facility did not follow cooling procedures for multiple days in July and August 2025. These failures were likely to result in putting residents at risk for foodborne illness (diseases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure valid copy of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a written medical order that assists people in making decisions about medical treatment and life saving measures during end-of-life care or medical crisis) for two of 26 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 6) had complete and accurate information.1. For Resident 5, the POLST indicated Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR, a medical order instructing healthcare professionals not to perform CPR (chest compressions, cardiac drugs, or intubation) if a person's heart stops or they stop breathing) and Selective Treatment, which conflicted with the physician's order stating, FULL CODE-DNR-Comfort Focused Treatment, resulting in inconsistent documentation regarding the resident's code status.2. For Resident 6, the POLST was missing required information of the resident, physician, and legally recognized decision maker. The deficient practice may result in Resident's end-of-life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safeguard the personal property for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 63) whose cellphone was reported missing on 2/9/25. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the missing cellphone was replaced in accordance with the facility's Theft and Loss Policy. These failures resulted in the loss of Resident 63's cellphone; and may disrupt communication with family and friends and decrease sense of safety and trust in the facility's ability to protect residents and their belongings. Review of Resident 63's admission record indicated, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (a form of cognitive decline caused by reduced blood flow to the brain, often resulting from strokes or other vascular issues where a person experiences significant functional limitations and exhibits behavioral changes).Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately, not later two (2) hours after the allegation was made, as required by regulation involving resident 77.This failure resulted in a delay in reporting an abuse allegation and had potential to place all residents at risk for further abuse.A review of Resident 77 clinical document, titled Nurses Notes, dated 5/6/2025 at 12:14PM, the Nurses Noted indicated, incident dated 4/26/2025: redness under the left eye) Bruise? Reported to law enforcement asked the case number then she said that the police will come to investigate. SOC 341 was faxed to the following: Ombudsman - 650 364 5399, State - # 415 330 6350 Social worker ([NAME]) was informed that the IDT team decided to report the incident and CARE CONFERENCE (IDT) needed to cover regarding the incident that occurred on 4/26/2025A review of SOC 341(a form used in California for reporting suspected elder or dependent adult abuse) dated 5/6/2025. SOC 341…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation on an allegation involving physical and emotional abuse for one of 2 sampled residents (Resident J). Failure to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse did not ensure other residents were protected from abuse. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident J was admitted with diagnoses including injury to cervical (neck) spine, quadriplegia (loss of movement and sensation to arms and legs), osteoporosis (fragile bones), osteoarthritis (pain, swelling of the bones and joints), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that affects a person's energy, thoughts, and unusual shifts in mood from extremely highs [manic episode] to lows [depression], and anxiety (excessive, persistent feeling of worry and nervousness). A review of the minimum data set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) brief interview of mental status (BIMS, a brief memory test to help determine cognitive ability [ability to remember and make decision]) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA, is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline) for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 56) who had a significant change in status on 1/20/25. The deficient practice may result in delayed provision of care, treatment, and services for Resident 56. Review of Resident 56's admission record indicated, was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, gastrostomy (stomach) status (refers to the presence of a gastrostomy tube [G-tube] surgically created opening in the stomach through which a tube can be inserted for feeding or other purposes), high blood pressure, kidney disease, osteoarthritis (joint disease that causes pain, stiffness, and swelling), and adult failure to thrive (a decline in older adults…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled resident's (Resident 97) Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) included the medical diagnosis of osteopenia (fragile bones).This facility failure resulted in inaccurate MDS to reflect the current health status for Resident 97. A review of the physician progress notes dated 4/24/25, indicated the diagnoses for Resident 97 included dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills), diabetes (abnormally high blood sugar level) and hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure). A review of the facility reported incident dated 5/4/25, indicated on 4/25/25, Resident 97 fell out of bed and sustained a fracture (broken bone) through the right femur (thigh bone). A review of the facility reported incident dated 5/4/25, the result of the imaging (a procedure used to create a picture of the inside of the body) that was completed on 4/25/25, indicated Resident 97 has osteopenia (fragile bones). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool, used to provide an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 97) had a comprehensive care plan completed to address osteopenia (fragile bones). This facility failure had potential for Resident 97 to not receive necessary care and services.A review of the physician progress notes dated 4/24/25, indicated the diagnoses for Resident 97 included dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills), diabetes (abnormally high blood sugar level) and hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure). A review of the facility reported incident dated 5/4/25, indicated on 4/25/25, Resident 97 fell out of bed and sustained a fracture (broken bone) through the right femur (thigh bone). A review of the facility reported incident dated 5/4/25, the result of the imaging (a procedure used to create a picture of the inside of the body) that was completed on 4/25/25, indicated Resident 97 has osteopenia (fragile bones). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool, used to provide an individualized, resident centered care)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively assess, evaluate, and implement interventions consistent with the nutritional status for one of three sampled residents (Resident A) when:1. The facility did not initiate a change of condition report to address Resident A's weight loss of 7.8 pounds (lbs.) within a month after it was identified on 10/7/25. 2. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident A's weight loss of 7.8 pounds as identified on 10/7/25.3. Weekly weight evaluations were not implemented in accordance with the facility's policy.4. There was no documented follow up assessment, actions, or interventions by a Registered Dietitian (RD, a health professional with special training in diet and nutrition) to address Resident A's weight loss. These failures had the potential to result in continued weight loss and poor nutritional status, which could negatively impact Resident A's overall health and well-being.Review of Resident A's admission record indicated, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their infection control policy and procedure (P &P), when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes during medication administration.This failure had the potential to expose residents to cross contamination and increase the risk of infection.During medication administration observation on 8/13/2025 at 10:04AM, room [ROOM NUMBER], LVN1 was preparing medications wearing gloves, LVN 1 was observed removing her gloves, checking the computer and donning a new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene.During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 10:15 AM, LVN 1 acknowledged forgot to do hand hygiene before putting on a new pair of gloves, yes I know I should perform hand hygiene first.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P & P) titled, IC 2-I: Hand Hygiene, dated 5/2019, the P & P, indicated, To prevent the spread of infection to patients and healthcare workers by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident ' s bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization) to four of four sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, and 4) or their responsible party (RP) at the time of transfer to acute care hospital. This failure could result in residents and/or their RP not being fully informed of their right to request a bed hold and to return to the facility after hospitalization, potentially leading to inappropriate discharge. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that include encephalopathy (a general term that describes brain disease, damage, or malfunction usually related to inflammation within the body) and urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system). During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/8/25 at 3:37 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate a grievance regarding administration of tube feeding formula as ordered by the physician for Resident 1, one of three sample residents. The facility ' s investigation was not thorough because they failed to : 1. Consider the maximum rate their tube feeding pump could run at (295 ml/hr, mililiter per hour, milliliter= unit of fluid measurement). 2. Identify an unclear tube feeding physician order. The tube feeding order directed staff to administer each feeding (325 ml) within an hour. Given the maximum rate of the pump, it was impossible to infuse the ordered amount with the pump alone within the time frame specified. 3. During the investigation, staff failed to measure the total amount of tube feeding within an enclosed bag and staff failed to measure tube feeding formular remaining in the bag lack after the third feeding. Without this information, it would be difficult to conclude if the ordered amount of tube feeding was being administered. 4. During the investigation, staff failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-14 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, facility staff failed to treat three out of 24 sampled residents with dignity (Residents 6, 82, and 408) when these residents have to wait 30-45 minutes for staff to answer their request/call light for assistance. Failure to answer a resident's call light in a timely manner did not ensure these residents were treated in a dignified manner. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set(MDS-an assessment tool) dated 11/09/2023, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had multiple diagnoses including: respiratory failure, obesity, kidney failure leading to dialysis, wound near the tail bone. His MDS indicated he has a urinary catheter and was incontinent of bowel. During an interview on 02/06/2024 at 10:04 AM. Resident 6's responsible party stated .my dad would have a BM and I would be on the phone with him and sometimes it could be as long as 45 minutes before they get to him. Staff would tell us that they were short staff and that they were taking care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents about the facility's grievance process. Seven out of seven sampled residents were not aware of the grievance process (Residents 5, 19, 24, 32, 55, 57, and 72). For Resident 408, the facility failed to complete the resolution review of the grievance process. Failure to inform or follow the grievance process, did not ensure concerns from the residents or their responsible parties were addressed in an appropriate and timely manner. Findings: During the resident council meeting with residents on 01/30/2024 at 2:04 PM, Residents 5, 19, 24, 32, 55, 57, and 72 were asked about the facility's grievance process. All seven residents stated they were not aware the facility had such a process. During initial rounds on 01/30/2024 at 10:08 AM, Resident 408 stated she had eight boxes of personal items missing during her transfer to this facility. She stated the facility claimed her friend had all her missing belongings. She claimed that the facility had been lying about the whereabouts of her belongings. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments for three of 24 sampled residents (Residents 4, 6, and 13) were accurate when; 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) for Resident 4's dental assessment was inaccurate. 2. The MDS indicated Resident 6's hemodialysis treatment was inaccurate. 3. The MDS indicated Resident 13 had three pressure ulcers when there was only one. Failure to complete accurate assessments could potentially harm the residents by not providing needed care and services to maintain their highest level of functioning. Findings: 1. Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypertension (high blood pressure) and mild cognitive impairment. During an observation on 1/30/24 at 12:11 PM, Resident 4's upper denture was placed in a denture cup on top of an overbed table. Resident 4 then removed her lower denture during mealtime. During a concurrent interview, Resident 4 stated, I cannot close my mouth and chew when I use it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CP) for each resident that included measurable objectives and specific interventions for seven of 24 sampled residents (Residents 4, 7, 70, 78, 38, 407, and 6) when: 1. No individualized person-centered CP was developed for Resident 4's pain due to unfit dentures. 2. No individualized person-centered CP was developed for Resident 7's use of Lovenox (a blood-thinning drug used to prevent formation of blood clots). 3. No individualized person-centered CP was developed for Resident 70's use of Zolpidem (a medication primarily used for the treatment of sleeping problems). 4. CP did not reflect the use of gloves, tab and bed alarms for Resident 78. 5. CP did not reflect management of planned weight loss for Resident 38. 6. CP for Resident 407 did not address the specific target behavior (extreme fear) for the use of Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication). 7. Dialysis CP did not reflect the accurate dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide preventive treatment and services to maintain and improve range of motion (ROM) for four of 14 sampled residents (Residents 12, 22, 38, and 14) when the physician's order for ROM exercises was not implemented. This deficient practice had the potential to limit the residents' ROM or possible development/worsening of a contracture. According to a Medical Dictionary, retrieved from http://medical dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/range+of+motion+exercise, on 2/16/24, indicated, . Range of motion is one aspect of exercise important for increasing or maintaining joint function . Passive range of motion is movement applied to a joint solely by another person or persons or a passive motion machine. When passive range of motion is applied, the joint of an individual receiving exercise is completely relaxed while the outside force moves the body part, such as a leg or arm, throughout the available range. Injury, surgery, or immobilization of a joint may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment by neglecting to properly clean one of the four fixed kettles between serving porridge and soup for lunch. Additionally, kitchen prep surface drainage holes, encrusted with dried, unidentifiable food particles, were exposed and untreated. This failure had the potential to result in potential health risks to residents. Findings: During a kitchen observation on Tuesday, 01/30/24 at 10:28 AM, four large empty built-in cooking kettles were noticed, with only the last kettle functioning. At 10:36 AM, a stainless-steel prep table near the outside of dietary offices revealed a hole approximately 2 inches in diameter, uncovered, and encrusted with food residue. Another prep table on the opposite side of the room had a similar uncovered hole, also encrusted with unknown residue. In an interview on 01/30/2024 at 10:55 AM with S14 (Dietary cook), S14 explained the process of cleaning the kettle, stating, I rinse after cooking. If using 'creamier' items that leave residue on the sides, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-14 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide for a community dining and activity area on the 4th floor, 5th floor, and 7th floors, resulting in residents being confined to their rooms for all meals. Findings: During an observation on 01/29/2024 at 11:45 AM, there was no common area/dining room for the residents noted on the 7th floor. During an observation on 01/30/2024 at 03:50 PM on the 9th floor, there were no added chairs/tables. The room is currently being used for singing activity. Residents from 4th, 5th, and 7th floors share use of this one room. Capacity is limited, especially with all residents brought in wheelchairs accompanied by their CNAs. During an observation on 01/30/24 at 04:35 PM, there was no common area/dining room for the residents on the 5th floor. During an interview with S04 (Director of Dietary) on 2/01/2024 at 3:25 PM, stated unaware if [NAME] has any plans for installing a dining area on each floor. During an interview with S01 (Director of Admin) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a shower area was clean after use and two window screens were missing. Failure to clean a shower after use,and properly maintained window screens did not ensure residents were provided with a clean, comfortable, homelike environment. Lack of a window screen has the potential for flying pest to come into a resident's indoor living space. Findings: During initial tour with the Director of Nursing(DON) on 1/29/24 at 3:07 PM, the shower room across room [ROOM NUMBER] was found used and not cleaned: 1. Strands of hair on the tile floor. 2. A commode container full of empty plastic personal hygiene product bottles (lotions and shampoo containers). 3. A safety razor on the floor. 4. An opened body wash bottle labelled 211A on the grab bar. 5. Used plastic gloves in the recessed soap dish. During a concurrent interview with the DON, she stated staff should not leave the shower in this manner and staff should clean the shower after use. During initial tour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy consultant's recommendation for the use of psychotropic medication was acted upon for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 86). This failure had the potential for Resident 86 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications, be exposed to adverse health consequences from the medications, which could negatively impact the residents' mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 86 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including mood disorder (described by marked disruptions in emotions), major depressive disorder (medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act). Review of Resident 86's Physician Order Report dated 12/1/23 through 12/31/23 indicated, .Start date 11/27/23 Risperdal (Risperidone) 1 mg 1 tab oral at bedtime .for mood disorder . Review of Resident 86's Pharmacy Services: Initial Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 11/26/23 indicated, .D (diagnosis): Mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate record for 3 of 24 sample residents (Resident 25, 396, and 397). For Residents 25 and 397, staff failed to document their fluid intake accurately. For Resident 396 an anti-psychotic target behavior was documented incorrectly. Failure to accurately document fluid intake or target behavior has the potential for the care team to act or recommend treatment based on inaccurate information. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 397's record titled Minimum Data Set(MDS- an assessment form), dated 11/10/2023, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: gastric reflux (stomach acid flows back towards mouth), anxiety, asthma, diabetes (blood sugar control issues), noncompliant with medical treatment, and localized fluid retention. Review of Resident 397's matrix provided by the facility 01/31/2024 indicated he had excessive unplanned weight loss. Part of managing a resident with unplanned weight loss is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure education regarding protective vaccine were documented and follow up and/or refusals were documented in two of four sampled resident's records (Residents 70 and 88). Failure to document education did not ensure residents and/or their responsible parties could make an informed decisions regarding vaccines. Failure to follow up and/or document refusals did not ensure residents healthcare choices were honored. Findings: Pneumovax vaccines help our bodies develop immunity to the bacteria that causes pneumonia. During a concurrent record and interview with RN 5 on 02/02/2024 at 11:18 AM, these items were found missing: 1. Resident 88: no pneumovax vaccine was administered, no refusal for pneumovax, and no education regarding pneumovax. 2. Resident 70: no pneumovax vaccine was administered, no refusal for pneumovax, and no education regarding pneumovax. RN 5 was asked to search these records for the missing information and RN 5 was unable to find the information.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure education regarding protective vaccine were documented and follow up and/or refusals were documented in two of four sampled resident's records (Residents 13 and 89). Failure to document education did not ensure residents and/or their responsible parties could make an informed decisions regarding vaccines. Failure to follow up and/or document refusals did not ensure residents healthcare choices were honored. Findings: COVID-19 vaccines help our bodies develop immunity to the virus that causes COVID-19. During a concurrent record review and interview with RN 5 on 02/02/2024 at 11:18 AM, these items were found missing: 1. Resident 89, no COVID-19 vaccine was administered, no refusal for COVID-19 vaccine, and no education regarding COVID - 19 vaccine. 2. Resident 13, no COVID- 19 or pneumovax vaccine were administered, no refusals for COVID -19 or pneumovax vaccines and no education regarding COVID- 19 and pneumovax. RN 5 was asked to search these records for the missing information and RN 5 was unable to find the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, an emergency cart plastic lock tag did not match the lock tag documented on the log. Failure to follow procedure regarding logging lock tags did not ensure emergency devices and/or supplies would be available in the event of an medical emergency. Findings: During initial rounds on 01/29/2024 at 12:45 PM, a crash cart's (a cart containing essential life saving devices, medications and other supplies) red plastic lock tag (placed to ensure no one has accessed or tampered with the cart) was found not to match the information on the crash cart's log book. This observation was confirmed with RN 7. RN 7 was unable to provide an explanation of why the tag does not match the one in the log book. RN 7 explained that once the cart is accessed, the whole cart is sent to central supply to be re-stocked and new red plastic lock tag installed and the tag number is entered into the log book. Review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy: Emergency Drugs: Crash Carts / Drug Trays / Boxes, revised on 3/21, indicated .Emergency crash carts in strategic locations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a secure handrail in their corridor. Failure to maintain handrails did not ensure residents who relied on handrails for mobility and/or support would be safe from a fall. Findings: During initial tour on 01/29/2024 at 10:29 AM, a handrail outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was found not secured properly to the wall. This observation was confirmed with RN 6. RN 6 stated she would inform maintenance.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide training to all nursing staff how to perform range of motion (ROM) exercises to residents in accordance with the facility policy. (Refer to F 688) This failure could potentially delay the identification of issues and provision of care to prevent further decline of resident's functional status. Findings: Resident 98 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including history of cerebral vascular attack (CVA or stroke include symptoms like trouble walking, speaking, and understanding, as well as paralysis or numbness of the face, arm, or leg). During an observation on 5/2/22, at 10:09 AM in Resident 98's room, Resident 98 was in bed alert and was waving her left arm. Resident was not able to move her right arm. Review of Resident 98's care plan, dated 4/8/22, indicated CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) to provide ROM during adls (Activities of Daily Living) to UE (upper extremities) and LE (lower extremities). During an interview with CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and document an individualized (own) facility-wide assessment (assessment of resident care needs) to determine resources needed to care for its resident population. The lack of development and documentation of a facility-wide assessment had potential to affect the care and safety of all residents. Findings: During a review of a facility document titled Facility-Wide Self Assessment dated 7/12/21, the Facility-Wide Self Assessment indicated that the document was a template developed by the State of Missouri's [NAME] School of Nursing. The document had the State of Missouri's regulations were documented on it. During an interview with Quality Officer (QS 1), on 2/15/22, at 9:30 AM, QS 1 acknowledged that the SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) used a template downloaded from the internet. She said that she found the template in a binder placed in her office, and did not know where the template came from. She confirmed that the SNF designated Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all portions of the residents' call light system was functioning to communicate resident calls from all residents' rooms and all bathrooms to the call system's computer placed at the nursing station. This failure had a potential to delay all resident call communications between residents and staff, delaying staffs' response to residents' urgent needs, with the potential to expose all residents to adverse events (unexpected injury, harm, death or risk thereof), and compromising their health and safety. Findings: During an observation on 2/8/22, at 10:45 AM, in Resident 3's room, Resident 3's room contained three resident beds, bed A, B, and C. Resident 3 was observed sitting on her wheelchair between the footboard of bed B and the wall, facing the door. She attempted to push her wheelchair backwards to move back to her bed, bed C to use the call light to call for assistance. During an interview with Resident 3, on 2/8/22, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident's visual privacy for one out of 33 sampled residents (Resident 238) when the privacy curtain was not pulled and the door to the resident's room was left wide opened, exposing his diaper and legs. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect resident's dignity and could potentially cause feeling of being shameful. Findings: During an observation, on 2/8/22, at 1:05 PM, Resident 238 was curled up in bed asleep, turned on his right side, facing the window, with his diapers and legs exposed, visibly seen from the hallway. In an interview on 2/8/22 at 1:06 PM, the Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was called to attend to the resident and described resident as tilted on his right side with his legs and diaper exposed. RN 1 stated, the resident was inadequately covered and curtain should be pulled to provide privacy. When asked the reason for providing privacy, RN 1 stated, it's for dignity and it can be shameful. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Patient Rights and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CCP) that included measurable objectives and timeframe for five (5) out of 33 sampled residents (Residents 135, 44, 77, 35 and 137) when: 1. For Resident 135, there was no evidence a comprehensive care plan for Dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) was developed. 2. For Resident 44, there was no evidence skin care plan was developed to address left abdominal fold abrasion and right upper buttock abrasion. 3. For Resident 77, there was no evidence skin care plan was developed to address abdominal folds rash. 4. For Resident 35, there was no evidence a CCP was developed to address the use of restraint (is any physical or chemical means or device that restricts resident's freedom). 5. For Resident 137, there was no evidence the facility and the Hospice Agency developed a CCP to address resident's Hospice care and needs. Failure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from a medication error rate of 5 percent or greater for six of 8 sampled residents (Resident 538, 123, 539, 540, 541, and 115) during medication pass observation when: 1. For Resident 538, Registered Nurse (RN) 3 did not give Fluticasone nasal spray (a medicine used to treat allergy or non-allergy nasal symptoms such as runny nose, and sneezing) as per the manufacturer's instructions, 2. For Resident 123, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not rotate injection sites of Copaxone (glatiramer acetate, a medicine that is used to treat multiple sclerosis, a disease that impacts the brain and nerves) as per manufacturer's instructions (Refer to F755), 3. For Resident 539, 540, 541, and 115, RN 2 prepared medications for four Residents at the same time. These failures resulted in three medication errors out of 31 opportunities with the facility's medication error rate of 9.68 percent. Findings: 1. Review of manufacturer's instructions of Fluticasone nasal spray (a medicine used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the hospital failed to ensure a Registered Dietitian (RD) provided frequent oversight of food and nutrition services and consultation to the Kitchen Supervisor which resulted in deficient practices related to the competency of foodservice staff for the following: a. Cooldown monitoring of foods capable of supporting bacterial growth associated with foodborne illness; b. Safe storage of refrigerated foods; c. Provision of timely and relevant dietary staff training related to the scope and nature of foodservice operations and d. Consistent use of standardized recipes These failures had the potential to lead to foodborne illness in a highly susceptible population for greater than 50 residents at the [NAME] and Coastside campuses who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. The intent of the Federal regulation as it pertains to the RD, is the RD is responsible for the functions of food and nutrition services including developing and implementing person centered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on food production operations the facility failed to employ sufficient and competent support personnel to implement foodservice operations as evidenced by 1) lapses in food production standards and 2) departmental position vacancies. Failure to ensure sufficient and competent dietetic services staff may result in unsafe food production practices putting residents at risk for foodborne illness and decreased meal intake further compromising medical status. Findings: 1. Recipe standardization is a key element in the efficient running of a food service institution. It plays an important role in ensuring the nutritional needs of patients are met, supporting a successful recovery. In addition, the use of standardized recipes ensures the quantity and quality of meals is consistent irrespective of who is preparing the meal. During general food production observation on 2/8/22 beginning at 11:00 AM, it was noted DS 3 was preparing zucchini for the noon meal. DS 3 was observed placing the sliced zucchini from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on meal distribution observations the facility failed to follow the menu when the portion sizes for 6 residents (Residents 38, 72, 97, 115, 242 and 243) at the [NAME] campus with physician ordered mechanically altered diets were not correct. Failure to follow the facility approved menu may result in decreased nutritional intake further compromising medical status. Findings: During meal plating observations on 2/8/22 beginning at 11:45 AM, the portions for all items on the steam table were ½ cup except for the mechanically altered zucchini. The serving size for the zucchini was plated as a 1/3 cup serving. In an interview on 2/8/22 at 2:15 PM, Dietary Staff (DS) 5 indicated the portion sizes for all items was listed as 4 ounces. The surveyor asked how she determined the portion size for the mechanically altered zucchini. DS 5 indicated she had to use a smaller portion as there were not enough 4-ounce scoops. DS 5 further stated in the past when she needed additional items, such as scoops, she would tell the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on dietetic services operations, dietary staff interview and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure food safety standards when there was lack of 1) effective cooldown monitoring of potentially hazardous foods 2) lack of date receiving of foods capable of foodborne illness as well as shelf stable foods; 3) food storage practices that may promote cross contamination; 4) lapses in handwashing procedures; 5) lack of adequate air gaps in food production equipment at both the [NAME] and Coastside campus; and 6) retention of damaged products. Failure to provide a food production environment that is safe and sanitary may result in foodborne illness, cross contamination of food and equipment and use of expired ingredients that may affect flavor and/or texture of food. Foodborne illness and cross contamination may result in gastrointestinal distress and in severe instances may result in death. The use of expired ingredients may result in a food product that is unpalatable, resulting in decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) identified on-going systemic issues, develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct the identified quality deficiencies when: 1. Resident's bathrooms at [NAME] Coastside were identified to have pungent odor, peeling, cracking of vinyl flooring, and water leak were not addressed. (Refer to F 584) 2. Failed to maintain functional call light system at [NAME] Coastside since 9/30/21. (Refer to F 919) 3. The performance improvement plan did not fully reflect actions to address identification of lapses in safe food handling practices and maintenance of the dietary physical environment. (Refer to F 803, 812 and 908) 4. Evaluation of residents population and identification of the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services was not conducted. (Refer to F 838) Failure to identify and act upon systemic concerns had the potential to negatively affect the care and services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.The facility failed to follow COVID screening in accordance with their mitigation plan for all visitors and staff. During an observation on 2/7/22 at 8:30 AM, the Security Officer (SO) responsible for screening, did not screen three CDPH Surveyors, visitors, and hospital personnel. During an interview with SO on 2/8/22 at 8:40 AM, stated he was not instructed on screening for COVID. During an interview on 2/8/22 at 11:00 AM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated he had provided a complete packet with screening instructions to the Security Manager. He indicated the Security Manager was responsible for distributing the information to all Security Officers working at the Main Entrance to the facility. A record review of a document titled Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Mitigation Plan for Skilled Nursing Facilities indicated HCP (health care personnel) Screening: all those who enter the Acute and Post Acute settings are screened for COVID 19 symptoms via screening stations at entrances of [NAME] Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on dietetic services observations, dietary and administrative staff interview and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure essential dietetic services equipment was functional at both the [NAME] and Coastside locations when there were multiple pieces of equipment that have been non-functional from 2 months to greater than 12 months. Failure to maintain equipment in a safe and functional manner may affect the ability for the department to operate in a safe and effective manner which may result in nutritional risk to residents. This has the potential to affect the efficient delivery of meal services to 108 residents. Findings: 1a. During evaluation of warewashing procedures at the [NAME] kitchen, and concurrent interview with Dietary Staff (DS) 2 on 2/7/21 beginning at 1:30 PM, he indicted the dishwasher was currently non-functional. DS 2 stated the equipment has been broken for at least 6 months and perhaps for closer to one year. He stated there was intermittent work conducted on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 37) who was at risk for fall. This deficient practice had the potential to result in falls, injury, and harm to the resident and not meeting Resident's needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/8/22, at 8:15 AM, Resident 37 was awake, banging the table with the empty water pitcher and yelling, I need water, I don't have a call light. Observed Resident 37's call light with its cord, hanging over the overhead light adjacent to Resident 37's bed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/8/22, at 8:35 AM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 looked for Resident 37's call light, then found it hanging on the overhead light above, adjacent to Resident's bed. LVN 1 stated, the call light was supposed to be within the reach of Resident at all times and gave the call light button to the Resident. During an interview on 2/8/22, at 9:25 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stated, Resident's call light was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their abuse prevention policy and procedure was implemented when there was no evidence of background screening for two nursing staff (CNA 4 and LVN 8). Failure to implement abuse prevention policy had the potential to compromise the resident's health, safety, and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of the 5-DAY INVESTIGATION SUMMARY, dated 5/24/21, indicated, .On 5/20/2021 at approximately 0830, (Resident 33) reported to the charge nurse . the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) from the night before (5/19/2021), pushed her hard to the right side lying position even if she had just told her that she did not want to be turned . (Resident 33) mentioned to CNA that there are instructions posted that she cannot be turned to the right .after CNA pushed her, she felt pain on the right shoulder and right side of neck . During an interview on 2/11/22, at 2:35 PM, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated CNA 4 is the alleged staff. CNA 4 was placed on administrative leave for a week and provided with abuse prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident in a timely manner for one of six sampled residents (Resident 132) with abuse allegation incidents when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7 reported the alleged verbal abuse two days after the incident. The facility failure to report abuse according to the required timeframe had the potential to delay the identification and implementation of appropriate corrective action that may place the residents at risk of abuse. Findings: A review of the facility Report of Adverse Event letter dated 4/23/21 sent to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) via fax (transmission of data) on 4/23/21 at 5:34 PM, under descrption of events indicated, It was reported today (4/23/21) at 3:40 pm that a CNA witnessed the following event on 04/20/21 at approximately 9:30 pm: .The LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse) began suction (removal of plegm using a machine) the patient and stated I don't care if the patient is to going to die [sic]. During an interview on 2/9/22 at 3:47 PM, CNA 7 stated, on 4/20/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflect the functional status of two of 13 sampled residents (Residents 66 and 65). MDS is an assessment tool that serves as the clinical basis for care planning and delivery of care and services Failure to complete accurate assessment could potentialy result in inappropriate care planning, ineffective interventions and/or delay in provision of needed care and services to maintain residents highest level of functioning. Findings: 1. Resident 66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include ischemic stroke (occurs when a vessel supplying blood to the brain is obstructed) with left hemiplegia (paralysis on side of the body). Review of the MDS dated [DATE] and 3/15/22, indicated Resident 66 had functional limitations on one side of the upper extremities and on both lower extremities and was totally dependent on nursing staff for all his activities of daily living. During an observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan (BCP) summary was provided to one of 33 sampled residents (Residents 241) when there was no evidence a summary of there BCP was provided to the resident and/or the responsible party. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk to not receive the quality of care and the appropriate interventions and goals to maintain the resident's quality of life. Findings: Review of the Face Sheet and the Hospice Physician's Order (HPO), dated 1/28/22, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 241 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the HPO indicated a terminal diagnosis of hepatic failure (liver damaged). In an interview on 2/10/22, at 10:24 AM, with the Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 explained, the facility would develop a Comprehensive Care Plan, used it as the Baseline Care plan (BCP) and would provide the BCP Summary to the resident and/or Responsible Party. During a concurrent interview and record review,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their wound care policy for two of 33 sampled residents (Resident 44 and 77), when: 1. Staff did not develop a non-pressure skin report and the nursing weekly summary did not indicate Resident 44's new skin condition. 2. Staff did not develop a non-pressure skin report and did not complete a nursing weekly assessment to address Resident 77's abdominal folds rash. This failure could potentially result in a negative outcome for Resident 44 and 77. Findings: 1. Resident 44 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that includes hemorrhagic stroke (an emergency condition in which a ruptured blood vessel causes bleeding inside the brain) with left hemiplegia (partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles). Review of Resident 44's progress notes, dated 1/28/21, indicated Resident 44 noted with left abdominal fold abrasion and right upper buttock abrasion. Review of Resident 44's clinical records and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of hazards when sharp objects were observed in plain sight in the room of one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 30). This failure had the potential to cause accident and harm when accessed by other residents. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including the trunk, legs, and arms). Review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/22/22, indicated Resident 30 is cognitively intact and has functional limitations in ROM on both upper extremities, and was totally dependent on nursing staff for all his activities of daily living. During an observation on 5/3/22 at 8:38 AM, four pairs of straight scissors and one screwdriver inside an open container were observed on the Resident 30's nightstand. In a concurrent interview, Resident 30 stated, Yesterday, I asked the staff to fix the armrest of my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate and implement interventions that are consistent with the nutritional status for one of four sampled residents (Resident 111) when: 1. Staff rely on the caregivers verbal report of Resident 111 meal intake percentage with no verification. 2. There was no Registered Dietitian (RD, a health professional with special training in diet and nutrition) nutritional assessment and progress notes addressing Resident 111's nutritional status for the month of February, March, and April 2022 and weight loss on March and April 2022. 3. The nursing staff did not document and communicate to the Medical Doctor (MD) and RD to address Resident 111's significant weight loss. These deficient practices resulted in a severe weight loss and had the potential to result in progressive decline in nutrition that compromised the health of Resident 111. Findings: Review of Resident 111's clinical record indicated, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemorrhagic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of eight sampled residents (Resident 123) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not rotate injection sites of Copaxone (glatiramer acetate, a medicine that is used to treat multiple sclerosis, a disease that impacts the brain and nerves) as per manufacturer's instructions. This failure may result to skin and fatty tissue irritation. Findings: During an observation on 2/8/22, at 9:00 AM, in Resident 123's room, LVN 3 administered (gave) Copaxone injection (a way of giving a liquid medicine by using a needle and syringe) to Resident 123's right abdomen. During review of Resident 123's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 1/25/22 to 2/8/22, indicated Copaxone was administered on the following dates: On 1/25/22 at 9:00 AM, given in the left arm On 1/26/22 at 9:00 AM, given in the right arm On 1/27/22 at 9:00 AM, given in the left arm On 1/28/22 at 9:00 AM, given in the right arm On 1/29/22 at 9:00 AM, given in the left arm On 1/30/22 at 9:00 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide food at required temperature for residents. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for poor food intake which could compromise their nutritional and health status. Findings: In an interview on 7/20/22, at 9:20 AM, Resident 91 stated, the food was served too hot, the hamburger was burned, and the food issue was brought up in the Resident Council meeting. Review of the April, May, and June 2022, Coastside Resident Council Minutes (RCM), indicated the following: On 4/28/22, it indicated, the hamburger patty was crispy and burned and the food was served too hot. On 5/26/22 indicated, the cold food is served hot and hot food is served cold. On 6/23/22 indicated, food is served too hot. In an interview, on 7/20/22, at 9:32 AM, the Dietary Staff (DS) 9 stated, the facility used a high heat disposable plates and dinex coffee mugs. In a group interview, on 7/20/22 at 12:18 PM, with the Physician 1, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Preventionist (IP) 2, Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) failed to ensure that staff educated and documented in residents medical records education regarding the risk and benefits of vaccinations, for one out of 33 sampled residents, Resident 35. This failure had a potential to expose Resident 35 to lack of information needed to make informed choices regarding immunization, increasing Resident 35 to the likelihood of suffering from adverse events (unanticipated injuries, harm, death or risk of infectious diseases) related to infectious diseases, and compromising her health and safety. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's record titled Inpatient Record dated 2/4/22, the Inpatient Record indicated that Resident 35 was a [AGE] years old female admitted to the SNF on 4/10/2. The SNF admitted Resident 35 with diagnoses that included hypertension, depression and anxiety. During a review of Resident 35's document titled Consultation Report dated 12/21/20, the Consultation Report indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure to ensure all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID-19 (a new infectious viral disease that can cause respiratory illness) when: 1. There was no evidence proof of vaccination were obtained for four (4) facility staff (Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3 and Staff 4). 2. Staff vaccination rate was less than 100%. Failure to track and document COVID-19 vaccination status of all staff could potentially increase risk of spreading infection in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of facility document, titled COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status, dated 2/7/22, and concurrent interview with Infection Preventionist (IP), on 2/09/22 , at 2 PM, indicated four staff was not vaccinated without exemption/delay. IP acknowledged the findings. IP was not able to provide evidence/proof vaccination for the four staff. Review of facility policy and procedure, titled Policy Concerning Required COVID-19 Vaccinations, no date, indicated I. Policy AHMC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$41,019 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $14,518 — penalty dated 2025-08-15
  • $12,438 — penalty dated 2025-04-18
  • $14,063 — penalty dated 2024-02-14
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-13 for 132 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-05 for 15 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-21 for 30 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AHMC HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AHMC HEALTHCARE, LPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST61%since 01/27/2021
MOCHI GROUP LPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST19%since 01/27/2021
OLIVIA JOY INVESTMENT CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 01/27/2021
AHMC HEALTHCARE INC.OrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2021
AHMC, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/27/2021
ALHAMBRA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/27/2021
APEX TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
CALMED INVESTMENT LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/27/2021
EVERGREEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
LIANG, AMY SHLOW- YEHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/27/2021
LIN, JOY YU CHUIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/27/2021
LIN, MATTHEWIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/27/2021
WU, YI KUNIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/27/2021
VARTANIAN, SARKISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/26/2021
HAZLEHURST, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
WU, JONATHANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2026
C. JIM CHEN ACCOUNTANCY CORPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2021
GONG, NASHED, PASCOE, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2021
LILIAN L. GONG & ASSOCIATES, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2021
SMC/COASTSIDE PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/14/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555235. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next