San Gabriel Valley Medical Ctr D/P SNF
438 W. Las Tunas Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776 · For profit - Corporation · 44 certified beds · (626) 289-5454 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 13.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 10.2% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 36.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 7.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.89 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.59 to 2.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 2 medication carts (Med Cart) were not left unattended and locked at all times in accordance with the facility's medication management policy. This deficient practice had the potential for unauthorized access to medications by staff and visitors which could lead to medication overdose (taking a toxic or poisonous amount of a drug or medicine), unauthorized use, adverse reactions (any unexpected or dangerous reactions to a drug), or harmful drug interactions (a reaction between two or more drugs or between a drug, and a food, beverage, or supplement).Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview of the Nurse's Station, on 4/25/2026, at 3:24 PM, Med Cart 2 was left unattended and unlocked. Medications of residents were observed inside the second and third drawers of Med Cart 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) stated the medication carts locked automatically once the drawers are pushed in. LVN 1 stated medication carts should always be locked when unattended. During an observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food-handling procedures and to maintain the food service area in a clean and sanitary manner, in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) when: One can opener was dirty, had peeled metal lining, and was chipped and rusted.One food processor was cracked and had white, crusty buildup.One clear plastic bag of breaded chicken was not labeled with the item name and the open date (date opened or first use).A container of chopped garlic in the refrigerator was not sealed.The rubber seal on the ice machine cover door was cracked and falling apart.A container of ready-mixed mashed potato powder in the kitchen spice rack was not sealed properly. These deficient practices have the potential to expose residents to pathogens (germs), placing them at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning), which may cause symptoms such as upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/25/2026 at 7:57 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and or diseases in the healthcare setting) were followed for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 12 and 36) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when:Contact isolation precaution (prevent the spread of infections transmitted by direct or indirect contact with a patient or their environment) signage was not posted outside Resident 12's room who was on contact isolation precaution.Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) failed to don (put on) and doffed (the safe and orderly removal) personal protective equipment (PPE, such as gowns, masks, goggles, gloves) during medication pass (a structured, routine procedure in healthcare settings, such as nursing homes, where nurses or qualified personnel administer scheduled medications to patients) for Resident 36 who is in contact isolation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain safe, clean, comfortable, sanitary and home-like environment for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 21 and 30) reviewed for environment by failing to: 1.Ensure that Resident 21's gastrostomy tube (G-tube pump, an electronic, battery-powered medical device that delivers liquid nutrition, fluids, or medication at a controlled rate directly into a person's stomach through a surgically placed abdominal tube) and pole were free of dried milk residue. 2.Ensure that the power strip, with four power cords plugged in, had electrical cables that were not coiled and tangled with Resident 21's G-tube pump base. 3.Ensure Resident 30's television's (TV's) power cord was not plugged into the distant outlet of the room. These deficient practices created an unsafe and unsanitary environment for Residents 21 and 30 and had the potential to result in accidents and the spread of disease and infection.Findings: 1. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure the confidential medical records for one (1) of (1) sampled residents reviewed for privacy (Residents 33) as indicated on the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Resident Privacy and Confidentiality. This deficient practice had the potential to violate the resident's right to confidentiality (safeguarding the content of information including video, audio, or other computer stored information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the resident and/or the resident's representative) and privacy and misuse of Resident 33's Protected Health Information (PHI, any information that relates to an individual's health status, medical history, or treatment).Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (long term breathing problem that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 34) reviewed for unnecessary medication, to reflect the resident's diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not to develop and implement an individualized care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident that includes measurable objectives, interventions and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental psychosocial needs) which could negatively affect Resident 34's overall well-being.Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of respiratory failure (a condition where there is not enough oxygen in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one (1) of one sampled resident (Resident 19) reviewed for abuse, by failing to assess and notify the physician after Resident 19 reported hitting his head on the headboard while getting repositioned up in bed (to move a Resident ensure a timely from the foot of the bed back toward the head of the bed) by Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4). This deficient practice has the potential to result in a lack of or delay in delivery of necessary care and services.Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] . During a review of Resident 19's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/19/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 19 had diagnoses that included status post cholecystectomy (previously undergone surgical removal of the bladder), recurrent aspiration pneumonia (repeated episodes of lung infection caused by the recurring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the activity of resident's preference for one of two sampled residents (Resident 19) reviewed for activities in accordance with Resident 19's Activity Assessment. Resident 19 was not able to watch television for more than a year. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 19 not being able to watch television, which had the potential to affect Resident 19's quality of life, sense of self-worth, and psychosocial (how a person's mental/emotional state interacts with their social environment, relationships, and surroundings) well-being and meaningfulness.Findings:During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 19's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/19/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 19 had diagnoses that included status post cholecystectomy (previously undergone surgical removal of the bladder), recurrent aspiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bladder training program (use of a timed schedule for bladder based on the resident's identified need and routine to maximize control of the resident's bladder function as much as possible) was implemented for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 34) reviewed for bowel and bladder care as indicated on the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) and physician's order.This deficient practice had the potential to prevent the restoration of the resident's bowel and bladder function and contribute to the development of a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system, including the kidneys, bladder, or urethra). Findings:During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 34 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of respiratory failure (a condition where there's not enough oxygen in your body). During a record review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures to ensure the accurate acquiring, administering of drugs and biologicals to meet the needs for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 36) reviewed and observed for medication administration, in accordance with the physician's order and facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure: Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) administered Resident 19's ferrous sulfate (a supplement used to increase iron levels to support red blood cell production) not exceeding 2 hours of the scheduled dosing time of 8 AM on 4/27/2026.LVN 3 administered Resident 36's order for doxazosin (Cardura, medication used to treat high blood pressure and symptoms of an enlarged prostate [a small, walnut-sized gland in males that sits just below the bladder and surrounds the urethra, which produces fluid that helps make semen, which carries sperm]). This deficient practice had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Two (2) medication errors (the observed or identified preparation of administration of medication or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order/manufacturer's specifications/accepted professional standards and principles) out of 25 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error which yielded a facility medication error rate of 8% for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 36) observed for medication administration. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) administered Resident 19's ferrous sulfate (a supplement used to increase iron levels to support red blood cell production) more than 2 hours of the scheduled dosing time of 8 AM as indicated on the physician's order and facility's policy. LVN 3 omitted (left out) Resident 36's order for doxazosin (Cardura, medication used to treat high blood pressure and symptoms of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurately documented for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 19) reviewed for abuse, (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) by failing to document Resident 19's report of hitting his head on the headboard while getting repositioned up in bed (to move a resident from the foot of the bed back toward the head of the bed) by Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4). This deficient practice had the potential to result in incomplete assessment of Resident 19's needs and could lead to a lack of or delay in delivery of necessary care and services.Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 19's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/19/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 19 had diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the discharge plan to ensure a safe discharge for one of one sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to provide a written form of discharge notice to the resident and family members and re-evaluate resident 1's condition for discharge.These deficient practices placed Resident 1 at risk for unsafe discharge.During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/31/25, the H&P indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/31/2025 with diagnoses that included chronic hypoxic respiratory failure (lungs consistently cannot get enough oxygen into the blood, leading to low blood oxygen and often normal or low CO2, causing symptoms like breathlessness, bluish skin, fatigue, and fast heart rate, stemming from lung damage or blood flow issues), recent subdural hemorrhage status post craniotomy (surgery to treat a collection of blood between the brain), and protein malnutrition (conditions from insufficient intake or absorption of protein and energy [calories], leading to impaired growth,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for two (2) of 2 residents (Residents 12 and 24) by failing to ensure: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) address Resident 12 with the resident's name instead of using a label prior to medication administration. 2. The curtain in Resident 24's room was fully drawn and/or the resident's door was closed while Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA1) was providing incontinent care to Resident 24. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 12 and 24's emotional and mental well-being. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (ME, occurs when problems with your metabolism cause brain dysfunction), diabetes mellitus (DM, is a metabolic disease, involving inappropriately elevated blood glucose levels), and dementia (impaired ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement treatment for the prevention of pressure ulcer (painful wound caused as a result of pressure or friction) by failing to ensure that the low air loss mattress (LALM, mattress used for residents who are at risk for developing pressure ulcer or already have a pressure ulcer, designed to circulate a constant flow of air) was on the correct settings for three (3) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents 14, 21, and 136) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 14 and 136 to develop a pressure ulcer and for Resident 21's stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole [rolled wound edges] are often present) to worsen. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care to prevent complications of enteral feeding (nutrition taken through the mouth or through a tube that goes directly to the stomach or small intestine) for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 12 and 4) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Turn off the enteral feeding pump before and during medication administration via gastrostomy tube (G-tube, surgical procedure wherein a tube is inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach used for nutrition and medication administration) for Resident 12. 2. Ensure medications were administered by gentle instillation or gravity via syringe into Resident 4's G- tube. This deficient practice had the potential for drug-nutrient interaction, G-tube clogging, less medication absorption and efficacy which could affect Residents 12 and 4's overall wellbeing. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and or diseases in the healthcare setting) were followed for five (5) of 13 sampled resident (Resident 26, 12, 4, 32, and 10) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Resident 26's foley catheter drainage bag (a urine collection bag) was observed touching the floor on 3/25/2025. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene in between tasks during medication administration to Resident 12. 3. LVN 2 failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene in between task during Resident 32's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, is a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) dressing change 4. LVN 2 failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene in between task during medication administration to Resident 4. 5. Facility failed to clean and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure the confidential medical records for one (1) of three (3) residents (Residents 4) as indicated on the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to violate the resident's right to confidentiality (safeguarding the content of information including video, audio, or other computer stored information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the resident and/or the resident's representative) and privacy and misuse of Resident 4's Protected Health Information (PHI, any information that relates to an individual's health status, medical history, or treatment). Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for the use of Apixaban (Eliquis, a prescription medicine used to treat blood clots in the veins of the legs or lungs) by not having a documented evidence to monitor the side effects and effectiveness of the medication for one (1) of 5 sampled residents (Resident 26) as indicated on the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 26 not to receive the care and treatment if the medication is ineffective and resident suffers from the side effects of Eliquis such as bleeding, which may result in injury and harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 26's diagnoses included respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your respiratory system [organs/ structures in the body that allows you to breath such as lungs]),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 24), who was dependent on the staff, was provided with appropriate care for activities of daily living (ADLs, activities related to personal care including bathing or showering, dressing, personal hygiene, using the toilet, and eating). Resident 24's fingernails on both contracted hands (a condition where the fingers or palm of the hand become permanently bent or curled) were observed long and untrimmed. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 24 to develop infection, skin breakdown, and injury, which could negatively affect resident's overall wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 24 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 24's History and Physical Examination (H&P) dated 8/23/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 24's diagnoses included chronic (long-term) subdural…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 13 sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 24) received treatment and care by failing to administer sequential compression device (SCD, a medical device that uses inflatable sleeves to apply pressure to the legs to help blood flow and prevent clots) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 19 and Resident 24 to develop deep vein thrombosis (DVT, occurred when a blood clot develops in one of the deep veins in the body) which could lead to hospitalization and death. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 19's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (lung cannot properly exchange gases, causing abnormal levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the blood), encephalopathy (a decrease in blood flow or oxygen to the brain), and quadriplegia (paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures to ensure the safe administration of drugs meet the needs of one (1) of five sampled residents (Resident 4) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not mix Lactulose (used to treat constipation) and Rivastigmine (used to treat dementia [a progressive state of decline in mental abilities] in people with Alzheimer's disease [a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities]) and administer to Resident 4 on 3/27/2025. This deficient practice had the potential for medication interaction, affect the efficacy of the medications, cause clogging in Resident 4's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, surgical procedure wherein a tube is inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach used for nutrition and medication administration) and result in adverse reactions such as gastrointestinal (GI)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Two (2) medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order/ manufacturer's specifications / accepted professional standards and principles) out of 25 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error which yielded a facility medication rate of 8% for one (1) of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4) observed during medication administration (med pass). Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not mix Lactulose (used to treat constipation) and Rivastigmine (used to treat dementia [a progressive state of decline in mental abilities] in people with Alzheimer's disease [a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities]) and administer to Resident 4 on 3/27/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to result in gastrointestinal (GI)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food items served to facility residents by failing to ensure: 1. Refrigerated opened food items were properly labeled with used by date 2. Unopened food items were removed from the original boxes were labeled with used by date This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness (any sickness that is caused by the consumption of food or beverages that are contaminated with certain infectious or noninfectious agents) to all residents who consume food by mouth and served by the facility kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation the walk-in refrigerator and interview with the Dietary Supervisor 1 (DS 1) on 3/25/2025 at 9:45 AM, DS 1 stated one (1) opened container with peeled garlic did not have a label to indicate opened date and used by date. DS 1 also stated several unopened food items which were removed from their original boxes did not have a label to indicate the name of the item, expired date, opened date, and used by date. 1. Four (4) unopened 1 Gallon (gal., a measure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to its policy titled Change in Resident Condition by not reporting a bruise sustained on the left leg for one of two sampled patients (Resident 1) to the physician and Resident 1's next of kin (daughter) This failure to escalate and address the bruise in a timely manner potentially compromised the quality and safety of care provided to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (document containing the resident's demographic and clinical data), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] for chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition where the patient does not have enough oxygen in the blood). During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/26/2024 at 2:30 p.m. with License Vocational Nurse (LVN, an entry-level health care provider who is responsible for rendering basic nursing care) in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 had yellow and light purple discoloration (bruise) on the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of five sampled residents (Residents 3, 27, and 236) were provided necessary treatment and services to prevent formation of and promote healing of pressure injury (pressure ulcers- injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and physician's order by failing to: 1. Accurately monitor, assess, and document Resident 3's skin from 4/1/2024 to 4/26/2024. Facility also failed to measure and document assessment of Resident 3's newly developed stage 2 pressure injury (when the wound extends into the bottom layers of the skin) on the right shoulder. Facility also failed to measure Resident 3's stage 2 pressure injury (when the wound extends into the top two layers of the skin as well as the fatty tissue) on the left ischium (the large bone in the lower part of the hip) and stage 3 pressure injury on the right ischium. This deficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to check gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) placement by auscultating the epigastric (upper central region of the abdomen) area while injecting a small amount of air for two (2) of two (2) sampled residents (Residents 14 and 24). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 14 and 24 to aspirate (when something enters the airway or lungs by accident) which can lead to lung problems such as pneumonia (a lung infection). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia (a condition in which the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells [provide oxygen to body tissues]), coronary artery disease (caused by plaque buildup in the wall of the arteries that supply blood to the heart),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for three (3) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 4, 28, and 34) by failing to provide emergency equipment in the activity room for accidental decannulation (the process whereby tracheostomy [trach- a surgically created hole in the windpipe that provides an alternate way of breathing)]tube is removed) for a resident with a tracheostomy in the activity room. This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 4, 28, and 34 to have respiratory distress during accidental decannulation. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 4's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 8/27/2023, indicated Resident 4 had a history of seizure disorder (abnormal electrical activity in the brain that happens quickly), hypertension and chronic respiratory failure (a long term condition in which the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe provision of pharmaceutical services as indicated on the facility policy by failing to: 1. Dispose expired medication found in Medication cart 1 drawer. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse reaction in the event that expired medication was administered to the residents. 2. Ensure Resident 4's Primidone (Mysoline, a medication used to treat convulsions) was stored and not found on the floor by Resident 4's doorway. 3. Ensure medications were kept locked at all times to prevent unauthorized access of the medications in the facility. These deficient practices have the potential to result in unauthorized access to medications by visitors and staff and predisposing them to possible medication overdose (taking a toxic or poisonous amount of a drug or medicine), unauthorized use of medications, adverse reactions (any unexpected or dangerous reaction to a drug), and drug-to-drug interactions (a reaction between two or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Label food in the kitchen with item name, date opened, and expiration date. 2. Ensure kitchen surfaces were clean. 3. Ensure there were no personal belongings stored in the kitchen storage. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) which could lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: 1. During concurrent observation of the facility's kitchen storage area and interview on 4/26/2024 at 6:26 PM with the Dietary Staff 4 (DS 4), DS4 stated the rice, flour, oyster sauce, and salsa containers were not and should have been properly closed. During concurrent observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly dispose garbage in the kitchen by failing to have a lid on the garbage containers in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents contributing to an unsanitary kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Dietary Director (DTD) on 4/27/2024 at 9:54 AM, there were multiple uncovered garbage cans observed in the kitchen. DTD stated, It is okay not to have covers so we are not touching the lid every time we have to throw trash inside the garbage can. During a concurrent observation and interview with DTD on 4/27/2024 at 10:23 AM, the garbage can in the dirty dishwashing area was full and did not have a cover. During a concurrent record review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control - Food and Nutrition Services, revised 2/2022 and interview with the DTD on 4/27/2024 at 3:52 PM, DTD stated, We need to have a fitting lid on the garbage cans per policy. We also need to change gloves every time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote respect and dignity for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Residents 236) by not ensuring Resident 236's indwelling catheter (soft, plastic or rubber tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain the urine) urine collection bag was inside the dignity bag (a bag used to cover and hold the catheter drainage/collection bag, so it is not visible). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 236 to experience loss of dignity and self-esteem. Findings: A review of Resident 236's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 236 on 4/1/2024 A review of Resident 236's History and Physical Examination, indicated Resident 236 was alert and oriented (it refers to a person's level of awareness of self, place, time, and situation). A review of Resident 236 's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 4/27/2024, indicated Resident 236 cognition was intact (processes of thinking and reasoning) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 236 was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 3) was provided a homelike environment in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by: 1. Using Resident 3's room to store 3 hospital computers workstations (used to store resident medication records and for documentation) and one tablet stand (used by facility staff, residents, and families to translate or for video calls). 2. Not replacing the window screen in Resident 3's room and leaving it propped against the wall. 3. Leaving a used disposable plastic cup on the floor next to the trash in Resident 3's room. This deficient practice had the potential for an unsanitary and unkempt resident environment and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 3's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 4/2/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-04-28 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Staffing Information posted was complete by failing to reflect the total and actual number of hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This deficient practice had the potential for the Nurse Staffing Information not to be available to the residents and visitors at any given time. Findings: During an observation on 4/27/2024 at 11:11 AM, the Daily Posted Nurse Staffing (Nurse Staffing Information), dated 4/27/2024, located at the nurse's station for 7 am to 3pm shift indicated a census of 38. It also indicated six (6) and a half (0.5) Licensed Nurses and five (5) Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs). The Daily Posted Staffing did not indicate the total and actual number of hours worked for both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff. During a concurrent record review of the Daily Posted Nurse Staffing, dated 4/26/2024 and interview with the Unit Secretary 1 (US 1) on 4/27/2024 at 11:11 AM, US 1 stated the US scheduled each day was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AHMC HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGVMC HEALTHCARE INVESTMENT LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 12/22/2007 |
| SGVMC HEALTHCARE LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| AHMC, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/30/2014 |
| ALHAMBRA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| AMERICAN HOSPITAL INVESTMENT INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| CALMED INVESTMENT LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| EVERGREEN TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2022 |
| HUANG INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| LAS TUNAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| SAN GABRIEL HEALTHCARE LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| UNIVERSAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| LIN, JOY YU CHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| LIN, MATTHEW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/22/2007 |
| WU, JONATHAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/18/2007 |
| WU, YI KUN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/18/2007 |
| CABALLERO, EILYN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/03/2022 |
| GRIM, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/28/2014 |
| KHATKAR, TARINDER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/06/2025 |
| MARSH, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2011 |
| SAN GABRIEL HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/22/2007 |
| CHU, SHAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555237. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.