No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adventist Health Delano

1401 Garces Hwy, Delano, CA 93215 · Non profit - Corporation · 51 certified beds · (661) 721-5591 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (661) 721-5591 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607, F0609) — most recent Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$123,442 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $123,442 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1205 Garces Hwy · (661) 721-3530 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1205 Garces Hwy · (661) 778-0460 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
428 High St · (661) 720-9961 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1015 11th Ave · (661) 721-3335 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
501 Main St · (661) 586-4941

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.8%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.6%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%12.0%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.36
RN hours/ resident / day
2.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
6.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.18
RN hoursweekends
25.0%
Total nursing turnover
5.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 46.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.57 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.43 to 1.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-01)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-07-03 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain vision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to: 1. Administer Lumigan (prescription medicated eye drops that helps reduce intraocular pressure-the fluid pressure in the eyes. If the pressure is too high, it can cause irreversible vision loss) as ordered by the ophthalmologist (OPTH - medical doctors who specialize in all aspects of eye care). 2. Arrange the follow-up appointment with OPTH as ordered for continued eye assessment and care management. These failures resulted in Resident 1 experiencing pain, headaches, photosensitivity (sensitivity to light), blurry vision, increased intraocular pressure, and potential to result in neovascularization (abnormal blood vessel growth that can result in bleeding, swelling, and vision loss) in the left eye due to presumed (suppose that something is the case on the basis of probability) ischemia (lack of blood supply).Findings:1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure podiatry (the medical field that specializes in the diagnosis, treatment, and study of disorders affecting the foot, ankle, and lower leg) care and treatment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 requiring surgical intervention (a procedure performed on the body to treat a medical condition) and Intravenous (IV – given through the vein) antibiotics (medicines that treat bacterial infections [invasion and growth of germs in the body] by killing bacteria or preventing them from reproducing) for the infection to his left (first and second) foot and right (fourth) foot. 2. Administer IV antibiotics as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) infection to his left (first and second) foot and right (fourth) foot. This failure resulted in a delay in care and had the potential for continued skin breakdown and infection. 3. Follow the physician order for podiatry consult for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct pre-hire reference checks on Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 who was providing care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to expose vulnerable residents to abuse and/or other negative effects.Findings:During an interview on 6/3/26 at 10:14 a.m. with Quality Assurance (QA), QA stated on 5/24/26 Resident 1 had reported an allegation of abuse to his daughter that an unidentified male worker had struck him on the head. The daughter reported the allegation the same day (5/4/26). QA stated the facility identified two male workers that had recently worked with Resident 1. One of the workers was CNA 1.During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/3/26 at 11:23 a.m. with Human Resources (HR), CNA 1's employee file (EF) was reviewed. The EF indicated CNA 1 was hired on 9/30/24. The EF indicated no reference checks were conducted for CNA 1. HR stated the facility had stopped conducting reference checks in August of 2023 (specific date not indicated). HR stated a reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, update, and implement a person-centered care plan (CP) for three of 15 sampled residents (Resident 39, Resident 17, and Resident 5). This failure had the potential for residents' immediate care needs to not be met. Findings: During a record review of Medical Record,Resident 39 was in a persistent vegetative state (appears awake but has no awareness of their environment) and post cranial post flap (surgical procedure removes a section of your skull) surgery. During an interview on 5/28/26 at 9:08 a.m. with Administrative Assistant (AA), AA stated she did not find updated care plan under neurology following the resident's post-surgical procedure. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/28/26 at 9: 38 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Resident 39's CP was reviewed. RN 1 stated there should be a CP for neuro checks (check for changes in personality and behavior) after residents post cranial surgery. During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review, on 5/28/26 at 2:09 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 2) had physician orders for foley catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) change and a feeding tube (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be) dressing change. These failures had the potential for Resident 7 and Resident 2 to have complications related to foley catheter and feeding tube care. 2) Blood pressure (physical force of circulating blood pushing against the walls of your arteries as your heart pumps through your body) was checked before administering the medication for one of four sampled residents (Resident 44). This failure had the potential not to meet Resident 44's needs.3) To follow its policy and procedure (P&P), tilted Nursing Assessment and Reassessment for Patients, for one of 15 sampled resident (Resident 39) when Resident 39 had no neurological assessments. This failure had the potential for adverse effects for Resident 39. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-01 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify, develop, and implement infection prevention and control action database identified by the survey team (F690). This failure placed all facility residents at risk for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI-infection in the urine). Findings: During an interview and record review on 5/28/25 at 9 a.m. with Infection Preventionist Director (IPD), The Facility-Level Quality Measure (QM) Report, date 11/1/25 through 4/30/26 was reviewed. The QM indicated, the facility national percentage of UTI was at a 93 percentage. IPD stated the facility does not map UTI's. During an interview on 6/1/26 at 12:08 p.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated she was unaware of how the data is being reported and needs to get better at tracking the urinary catheter and UTI's. During a review of facility's Special Care Unit (SCU) Quality Assurance Meeting Minutes (Meeting Minutes), dated 1/21/26 was reviewed, the Meeting Minutes indicated Infection Preventionist Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic (medication to treat mental disorders) medication consents were completed appropriately for two of four (Resident 17, and Resident 19) sampled residents. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive psychotropic medication without knowing all the risks and benefits.Findings:During a review of Resident 17's Psychotherapeutic Drug Informed Consent Form (PDICF), dated 3/27/26, the PDICF indicated, 10. Caution and Warning Summary.c) Black Box Warning Label was checked No. The PDICF was for Risperidone (used for mental disorders) 0.25 milligram (MG).During a review of Resident 17's PDICF, dated 3/27/26, the PDICF indicated, 10. Caution and Warning Summary.c) Black Box Warning Label was checked No. The PDICF was for Risperidone 0.5 MG.During an interview on 6/1/26 at 8:46 a.m. with Pharmacist 1, Pharmacist 1 stated risperidone does have black box warning. Pharmacist 1 stated black box warning label should be checked yes and risk and benefits should be explained to the resident or resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P), tilted Advanced Healthcare Directive, Surrogate Decision Maker, for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 44 and Resident 7) who were unable to sign an Advance Directive (AD - legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions). This failure had the potential for Resident 44 and Resident 7 wishes not to be honored.Findings:During a review of Resident 44's California Standard admission Agreement For Skilled Nursing Facilities and Intermediate Care Facilities (admission Agreement), dated 11/17/23, the admission Agreement indicated, the box on the admission and readmission Agreement Signature Sheet, which was meant to be checked or left blank for All signed Advance Directive, was left unmarked.During a review of Resident 44's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated 11/17/23, the POLST indicated, no advance directiveDuring a review of Resident 44's Social Services Evaluation (SSE), dated 5/13/26, the SSE indicated, Advance Directive .Pt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders prior to the application of bed alarm (a sensors that will alarm when a resident stands up unassisted to help prevent falls by alerting staff) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to result in violation of residents' rights.Findings:During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review, on 5/28/26 at 2:52 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, Resident 5 was in bed and had a bed alarm on. During a review of Resident 5's Medical Record (MR), [undated] was reviewed. RN 1 stated Resident 5 had a bed alarm while in bed and when up in chair. RN 1 stated there was no physician order for the bed or chair alarm. RN 1 stated bed and chair alarm is considered a restraint and there should be a physician order prior to applying bed and chair alarm.During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Physical Restraint and Reduction, dated 5/30/26, the P&P indicated, A physician's order is required before reducing restraints.9. A physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for foley catheter (a flexible tube passed through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine) change for one of two sampled resident (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 having a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) with the possibility of sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection).Findings:During a review of Resident 2's Care Plan (CP), dated 8/6/25, the CP indicated, Eval [Evaluate] for Symptoms of UTI.Plan Removal of Indwelling Cath [foley catheter].During a review of Resident 2's Flowsheet (FS), dated 5/16/26, the FS indicated, Resident 2 was running a 101.1 Fahrenheit (normal range from 97 - 100.4 ) temperature. During a review of Resident 2's Clinical Note Nursing (CNN), dated 5/21/26, the CNN indicated, Therapy for Sepsis. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/28/26 at 3:36 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, Resident 2's Physician Orders (PO), dated 2/17/26 was reviewed. The PO indicated, Resident 2 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of seven sampled residents (Resident 44 and Resident 14) maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) during the medication pass observation. This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 16% consisting of four medication errors in a sample size of 25 opportunities for error. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/28/26 at 9:32 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, outside of Resident 44's room, LVN 1 was prepping the medication for Resident 44. LVN 1 poured valproic acid (medication used to control seizures) 250 milligram (mg)/ml (milliliter -unit of measure), poured 5 ml in the medication cup. LVN 1 stated there was 5 ml of medication in the medication cup.During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/28/26 at 10:14 a.m. with LVN 1, Resident 44's Physician Order Review (POR), dated 5/20/26, was reviewed. The POR indicated valproic acid give 1500 mg (30ml) two times a day. LVN 1 stated wrong dose of medication was administered and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their intervention to turn and reposition one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) every two hours to prevent pressure ulcers (damage to the skin and underlying tissue from constant pressure, often on bony areas like the tailbone or heels, reducing blood flow, which can cause redness, blisters, and open sores, especially in people who can't move easily). This failure had the potential to cause further skin damage and/or prevent healing for Resident 1.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's PHYSICIAN FACE SHEET (PFS), 7/5/25, the PFS indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency where the body's extreme response to an infection triggers a chain reaction, causing widespread inflammation that can damage tissues, lead to organ failure [a group of different tissues working together to perform a specific job in a living thing], and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide oral hygiene (the practice of keeping your mouth clean and disease-free) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause sickness and disease, tooth decay, bad breath, and decrease Resident 1's feelings of self-worth.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's PHYSICIAN FACE SHEET (PFS), dated 7/5/25, the PFS indicated Resident 1 is a [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis:a. Severe sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection) with septic shock (a life-threatening condition caused by infection),b. ALS (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a disease that progresses over time causing loss of muscle control),c. Ventilator (a machine that blows air in and out of lungs) dependence, and;d. Chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure on abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the staff accused was not separated from providing resident care. This failure had the potential for other residents to be abused. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's CODING SUMMARY (CS), dated 4/10/25, the CS indicated Resident 1 had a diagnosis of Tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the trachea [windpipe] through the front of the neck. This opening allows a tube to be inserted to maintain an airway and allow breathing) status, and cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain resulting in brain tissue death).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment (a standardized assessment to evaluate a resident's functional abilities and healthcare needs), dated 7/10/25, under the section titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment of cognition [how well a person thinks, remembers, and learns] with scores ranging from 0 - 15, the higher the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0837 — isolated
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on, ADVERSE EVENT (an undesirable medical occurrence) REPORTING, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a medication error resulting in harm was not reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 continually experience adverse health outcomes. Findings:During an interview on 7/2/25 at 9:57 a.m. with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated Resident 1 had a loss of vision to his left eye due to the facility not giving his Lumigan (prescription medicated eye drops) for intraocular pressure (the fluid pressure in the eyes. If the pressure is too high, it can cause irreversible vision loss. Normal pressure is from 10 and 21 mmHg [millimeters of mercury - a unit of measurement]) as ordered by his ophthalmologist (OPTH - medical doctor who specialize in all aspects of eye care). During a review of Resident 1's ORDER SHEET (OS), dated 2/11/25, the OS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a qualified full-time Director of Activities (the staff responsible for facility's resident activities program), for 45 of 45 residents. This failure had the potential for residents' activities needs to go unmet. Findings: During an interview on 4/9/25 at 3:10 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated she was taught how to fill out the Activities Evaluation in CERNER (an electronic health record charting system) and in paper chart by a unit clerk last month. CNA 1 stated the Director of Activities had been out on medical leave since February 2025. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 3:59 p.m. with Registered Nurse Manager (RNM) 1, RNM 1 stated the facility's Director of Activities had been out on medical leave since February 2025. RNM 1 stated the facility did not have an interim Director of Activities. RNM 1 stated there were CNAs who were trained to assess and complete the Activities Evaluation and to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, FACILITY PROCEDURE: STORAGE OF FOODS/PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT, when two of six canned garbanzo beans with dents (Can 1 and Can 2) were not removed from the dry storage room. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) in all 12 of 45 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 7:40 a.m. with Lead [NAME] (LC), in the Dry Food Storage Room, LC inspected the 12 ounce cans of garbanzo beans for dents. LC removed two cans from the six cans of garbanzo beans. Can 1, 12-ounce garbanzo bean can, had a dent at the seam approximately 2 inch long and ½ inch deep; Can 2 had an approximately 2 inch long and ½ deep dent. LC stated the dented garbanzo bean cans should not be in the dry food storage area with other canned foods for resident use. LC stated two out of six garbanzo bean cans had dents. LC stated the dented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure nursing staff disinfected a glucometer (a device that measures the amount of sugar in the blood) with approved wipes for three of three sampled residents (Resident 17, and Resident 40). This failure had the potential to cause infection and spread of bacteria to residents. 2. Implement their policies and procedures titled FACILITY POLICY:ENHANCED BARREIR PRECAUTIONS IN SCU [Specialty Care Unit], and FACILITY POLICY: Infection Control in SCU for four of four sampled residents (Resident 37, Resident 32, Resident 12 and Resident 2) when: 2a.Correct Infection Control Precaution (ICP, actions taken to reduce potential of transmitting infections/germs) signage was not posted for two of four sampled residents (Resident 37, Resident 32, and Resident 12). This failure had the potential to spread disease causing organisms (germs) to other residents, staff and ultimately the community. 2b. Emergency Medical Technician Transport (EMTT) did not dispose of his personal protective equipment (PPE- disposable gown,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and complete informed consent (a process in which residents are given important information about medical procedures and medications) for psychotropic medications (drugs that affect a person's mental state) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 21 and Resident 13). This failure had the potential for Resident 21 and Resident 13 to not be aware of the risks and benefits of taking psychotropic medications. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/9/25 at 9:40 a.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator/Registered Nurse (MDSC), Resident 21's Consent for the administration of psychotropic medications (Consent), dated 2/12/25 was reviewed. The Consent indicated, Resident 21 was on Seroquel (a medication used for mental illness) 25 mg at bedtime. The Consent indicated nurses signed on 2/12/25 and physician signed on 2/20/25. MDSC stated nurses obtain consent from family/resident and physician signs the consent when they visit the resident. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/10/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and accurately complete the annual Pre-admission Screening Assessment and Resident Review (PASRR - federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not incorrectly placed in nursing homes or long-term care instead of a psychiatric setting) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 13). This failure had the potential for Resident 13 to be placed in an inappropriate setting and not receive required services. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screening, dated 5/6/24, the PASRR indicated, 10. Does the individual have a serious diagnosed mental disorder such as Depressive Disorder [a mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness and loss of interest], Anxiety Disorder [excessive worry, fear and other physical and behavioral symptoms that interfere with daily life], Panic Disorder [frequent and unexpected panic attacks], Schizophrenia/Schizoaffective Disorder [a chronic and severe brain disorder that disrupts a person's ability to think…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 followed the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION THROUGH A FEEDING TUBE, and professional standards for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) with a Gastrostomy Tube (GTube-a device to allow feedings and medications to be administered directly to the stomach) when LVN 2 did not flush with water between medications. This failure had the potential for medications to clog or block the GTube resulting in Resident 4 not receiving the medication. Findings: During an observation on 4/9/25 at 8:22 a.m. in Resident 4's room, LVN 2 administered Docusate Sodium (medication to manage or treat constipation) via GTube to Resident 4. LVN 2 administered the next medication. LVN 2 did not flush the GTube with water after administering Docusate Sodium and prior to administring the next medication. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 8:29 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated she did not flush the GTube with water after administering the Docusate Sodium. LVN 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met at least quarterly, as required by regulation, when the QAA committee met only three times from May 2024 to April 2025. This failure had the potential for the QAA committee to not identify and correct facility quality deficits placing all 45 residents at risk for poor care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/10/25 at 2:03 p.m. with the facility's Registered Nurse Manager (RNM) 2, the minutes of the facility's QAA committee dated 1/20/25, 9/12/24, and 5/23/24 were reviewed. The RNM 2 stated the above minutes reflected the meetings of the facility's QAA committee during the past 12 months. The RNM 2 stated the facility's QAA committee met at least quarterly but was not able to hold quarterly meetings during the past year. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled [Facility's Name] Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) . 2025, dated 2025, the P&P did not indicate the frequency of QAA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of six sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4) were provided nail care. This failure had the potential for Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4 to develop an infection and skin breakdown. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), dated 1/29/25, the MDS Section GG (functional abilities and goals) indicated Resident 1 required total assist with maintaining personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 10/26/24, the CP indicated, Total dependent in all ADL (Activities of Daily Living - basic personal tasks performed daily) needs due to immobility. Interventions. Provide Assistance to Support Level of Need. During a review of Resident 2's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS Section GG indicated Resident 2 required total assist with maintaining personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 2's CP, dated 8/6/24, the CP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on restraint management for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's restraint was not monitored every two hours and the order for restraint was not renewed every three days. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1 developing injuries and adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Order Sheet (OS), dated 10/26/24, the OS indicated, Restraint Monitor. Right hand mitten to prevent pulling medical devices. Monitor every 2 hours and release for 15 minutes and check for circulation and skin integrity. During an observation on 1/29/25 at 1:48 p.m. in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 was wearing mittens on his right hand. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 2:56 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN1 stated Resident 1 was wearing mittens on his right hand because he had a behavior of pulling medical devices like GT (Gastrostomy tube – feeding tube that is surgically inserted through the abdomen and into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor medication room temperatures for 34 out of 34 (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 12, Resident 13, Resident 14, Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 17, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 22, Resident 23, Resident 24, Resident 25, Resident 26, Resident 27, Resident 28, Resident 29, Resident 30, Resident 31, Resident 32, Resident 33, Resident 34) sampled residents. This failure had the potential to alter medication effectiveness (the ability of a medication to produce the desired effect). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/22/25 at 3:48 p.m. with Facility Manager (FM), the facility medication room temperature logs (MRTL), dated were reviewed. The MRTL indicated the following days had missing entries: a. January 2025, there were missing signatures for 1/2 and 1/6. b. December 2024, there were missing signatures for 12/20 and 12/30. c. November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has failed to implement their policy on hazardous (dangerous and involves risk to someone's health) materials for 25 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 3, Resident 9, Resident 13, Resident 14, Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 17, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 22, Resident 23, Resident 24, Resident 25, Resident 26, Resident 27, Resident 28, Resident 29, Resident 30, Resident 31, Resident 32, Resident 33, and Resident 34). This failure had the potential to result in physical harm to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/22/25 at 3:24 p.m. with Quality Assurance (QA) in the activities room, the following was observed not secured and accessible by residents: a. Eight oz (ounce – unit of measurement) can of dust/lint remover (a flammable can of chemicals that removes dirt and lint). b. 18 oz bottle of foaming germicidal cleaner (a chemical cleaning product used on surfaces to kill bacteria and viruses). c. Eight cans of 8.23 oz of liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-21 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy on residents food storage for 11 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, and Resident 11). This failure had the potential for food borne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 3:57 p.m. with Facility Manager (FM) in the activities room, a refrigerator had a sign indicated, FOR [facility] RESIDENTS ONLY! THANK YOU! The refrigerator also had another sign that stated, NO OPEN BOTTLES LABEL ALL FOOD ITEMS WITH DATE AND TIME NO PLASTIC BAGS! In the refrigerator the following was observed: a. Approximately 24 inch (a unit of measurement) long piece of chocolate cake with a use by date of 12/20/24. b. Approximately 12 inch lemon pie with a use by date of 12/20/24. c. Liter (unit of measurement) of diet soda that was 1/4th (a unit of measurement) full, with no open date listed. d. 32 oz (ounce - a unit of measurement) bottle of cheese dip that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide home medications for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 12). This failure resulted in Resident 12 not being dispensed his home medications upon discharge and had the potential for negative health outcomes. Findings: During an observation on 1/22/25 at 3:48 p.m. in the facility medication room (FMR), two boxes with Resident 12's name on it were observed. The boxes had a label that indicated, Albuterol Sulfate (medication used to prevent and treat breathing difficulties) 2.5mg (milligram – a unit of measurement)/3 ml (milliliter – a unit of measurement). Inhale (breathe in) 3 ml (2.5 mg) via nebulizer (a tool used to turn liquid medicine into a mist to breath in) every 6 hours. The boxes had 120 vials (a small container) of Albuterol Sulfate left. The boxes had a date indicated 12/22/24. On the boxes was a note indicating Resident 1 was discharged (no date indicated). During an interview on 1/22/25 at 3:48 p.m. with Facility Manager (FM), FM stated Resident 1 was discharged home a month ago (did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure for abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. An allegation of abuse was not reported within twenty-four hours to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). 2. The investigation for the allegation of abuse was not completed within five days. 3. Two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1 and CNA 2) with an allegation of abuse were not removed from working in the facility immediately and/or monitored while the investigation for the allegation of abuse towards Resident 1 was still being conducted. These failures had the potential for delayed investigation and continued abuse for Resident 1. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought]), dated 10/10/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify Family Member (FM) 1 regarding a change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in FM 1 not being aware of a change in condition for Resident 1. Findings: During an interview on 10/9/24 at 8:50 a.m. with FM 1, FM 1 stated the facility had issues with notifying the family regarding Resident 1's change in condition. FM 1 stated when Resident 1 had a podiatry appointment (specific date not given), FM 1 noticed Resident 1 right heel was black with a possible skin injury. FM 1 stated she asked facility staff (not specific) what was going on with Resident 1's right heel and they (not specific) stated the heel had been like that for a while and FM 1 should had been informed about it. During an interview on 10/9/24 at 1:16 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated Resident 1's right heel had a dry callus (a thickened area of skin that forms when the skin is repeatedly irritated, rubbed, or pressed) with a black color. RN 1 stated a wound consultant had seen it (no date given)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in grievances regarding Resident 1's provision of care to not be addressed. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's CODING SUMMARY (CS), dated 11/14/23, the CS indicated, Resident 1 diagnosis including Quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), Acute (present) on chronic (persisting) respiratory failure (condition where it is difficult to breath on your own) with hypoxia (low oxygen), Tracheostomy (an incision in the windpipe made to relieve an obstruction to breathing). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought]), dated 10/10/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the Medical Doctor (MD) orders for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for negative health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated [DATE], the H&P indicated diagnoses including Cardiac arrest (heart stopped pumping) Anoxic brain injury (lack of oxygen to the brain causing brain death) Acute (sudden) on chronic (persistent) respiratory failure (lack of oxygen in the body). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought], dated [DATE], the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 was unable to be assessed due to persistent vegetative state (absence of responsiveness and awareness due to overwhelming dysfunction of the brain). During a review of Resident 1's MDS under the section GG (an assessment of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to staff appropriately to meet the needs of the residents for 12 of 13 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 11, and Resident 12). This failure resulted in diminished ability to provide effective care to the residents, had potential to have negative impacts on other residents from lack of staffing and resulted in new skin wounds for two residents (Resident 10 and Resident 12). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's CODING SUMMARY (CS), dated 11/17/23, the CS indicated, Resident 1 diagnosis including functional quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty) and Guillain Barre Syndrome (a rare disorder in which your body's immune system attacks your nerves). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) under the section Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs – an assessment tool for cognition [the mental processes including perception, memory, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) on abuse for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 13), when the alleged abuser Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was not removed from the working schedule and/or monitored until cleared from the abuse allegation. This failure had the potential to place Resident 13 at risk for further abuse and had the potential to place other residents at risk for abuse and serious harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's CODING SUMMARY (CS), dated 1/13/24, the CS indicated, Resident 13's diagnosis including history of chronic respiratory failure (condition when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood), dependence on respirator (means of providing oxygen to support or replace breathing), Tracheostomy (an incision into the wind pipe to provide a means for a person to breathe) and myoneural disorder (a disease that affects the nerves that control voluntary muscles). During a review of Resident 13's MDS (Minimum Data Set – an assessment tool) under the section Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an investigation for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 13) allegation of abuse within five (5) working days. This failure had the potential for the abuse allegation to not be thoroughly investigated and could result in further abuse. Findings: During an interview on 5/1/24 at 10:52 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated on 4/24/24 at approximately 6:30 p.m. Resident 13's sister called and stated Resident 13 alleged Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 had hit and aggressively pushed Resident 13's head. During an interview on 5/1/24 at 11:05 a.m. with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD stated an allegation of abuse was made on 4/24/24. SSD stated the investigation for the allegation of abuse had not been completed at this time. During an interview on 5/1/24 at 12:15 p.m. with Risk and Regulation Analyst (RRA), RRA stated the Director of Nursing (DON) had been investigating the allegation of abuse made by Resident 13, but the DON was unavailable due to being at a conference. RRA stated the Patient Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide enough direct care staff to ensure the daily needs were met for four of four sampled residents (Resident 21, Resident 18, Resident 34, and Resident 31) when: 1. Resident 21, Resident 18, Resident 34, and Resident 31 were not turned every two hours. This failure had the potential for Resident 21, Resident 18, Resident 34, and Resident 31 to develop pressure injuries (damage that can occur as a result of being in the same position for extended periods of time). 2. Resident 21's call light was not answered timely. This failure had the potential for Resident 21 to feel devalued and helpless. 3. Resident 21 face and hands were not cleaned before meals without asking. This failure had the potential for Resident 21 to feel helpless and neglected. 4. Resident 21, Resident 34, and Resident 19's Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) program (provided by RNA to help maintain or improve mobility for the residents) was not performed as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 41 of 41 licensed nurses were competent to: 1. Care and manage the nephrostomy (tube placed directly into the kidney to drain urine) tube for one of one sampled resident (Resident 18). This failure had the potential for the urine to flow backwards into Resident 18's kidney and may have contributed to multiple infections. 2. Administer medications through a gastrostomy (G-tube, tube inserted into stomach for nutrition and medication) tube for two of two sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 17). This failure had the potential for medication reactions, blockage of the G-tube, and insufficient water provided to Resident 25 and Resident 17. Findings: 1a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/8/24 at 10:54 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, Resident 18's nephrostomy bag was on the floor next to the bed. LVN 2 stated Resident 18 already had renal impairment (decreased kidney function). LVN 2 stated the nephrostomy bag should not be on the floor because it could cause an infection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI- a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes). This failure had the potential to result in facility issues not identified, recognized, addressed, and corrected appropriately. Findings: During a review of the facility's Special Care Unit (SCU) Quality Assurance Meeting Minutes (QAPI), dated 10/19/23 and 1/30/24, the QAPI indicated, the final survey findings during the onsite visit from 3/13/24 - 3/16/23.2. F658: Service provided meet professional standards. 3. F686: Treatment & services to prevent & heal pressure ulcers. 4. F688: Increase/prevention in ROM/mobility.6. F695: Respiratory/tracheostomy care and suctioning 7. F725: Sufficient nursing staff.11. F761: Label/store drugs & biologicals 12. F880: Infection prevention & control.Action column: blank. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/11/24 at 1:59 p.m. with Quality Manager (QM), the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Conduct infection control surveillance that included collection of data, analysis, tracking and trending, and follow up of outcomes of infections for 46 of 46 residents. 2. Ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) and Director of Infection Prevention (DIP) performed their duties to complete infection control surveillance for 46 of 46 residents. 3. Store and label oxygen tubing to prevent contamination for one of three sampled residents (Resident 201). 4. Ensure nephrostomy (tube placed directly into the kidney to drain urine) was secured and maintained in a clean environment to prevent infections for one of one sampled resident (Resident 18). 5. Ensure hand hygiene was performed after administration of medications through a gastrostomy (G-tube, tube inserted into stomach for nutrition and medication) and before staff provided oral care and suctioning of a tracheostomy (surgical opening in the neck) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 6). These failures had the potential for serious infections to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool) quarterly (every three months) assessments were completed for five of nine sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 19, Resident 21, Resident 34 and Resident 13). This failure had the potential for the delay in the development and implementation of Resident 1, Resident 19, Resident 21, Resident 34 and Resident 13's individualized care plans. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/8/24 at 9:23 a.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC stated, I'm behind with my assessments. MDSC stated quarterly MDS assessments need to be completed within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD-the specific end point of look-back periods in the MDS assessment process). The following residents' quarterly MDS assessments were reviewed: a) Resident 1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the MDS assessment was not completed. b) Resident 19's quarterly MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were followed when: 1. One of one sampled resident's (Resident 18) nephrostomy tube (tube placed directly into the kidney to drain urine) was not secured and maintained in a clean environment. This failure had the potential for Resident 18's nephrostomy tube to be displaced and urine to flow back into the kidney and the potential for infection. 2. Multiple medications were crushed and administered together through a (G-tube, inserted through the belly, directly into the stomach) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 17). This failure had the potential to cause a blockage in the G-tube and violated Resident 25 and Resident 17's right to refuse a medication. 3. One of eight sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 7) performed work outside of the Certified Nursing Assistant scope of practice when CNA 7 reconnected Resident 28 to Blow By (a method used to deliver humidified air or oxygen to a resident with a tracheostomy[surgical incision in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Pressure Injury or Skin/Wound Conditions- Assessment, Prevention and Management when staff did not turn and reposition one of seven sampled residents (Resident 15) every two hours. This failure had the potential to result in impaired healing or worsening of a pressure injury (PI-localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue as a result of prolonged pressure). Findings: During a review of Resident 15's Clinical Data Flowsheet (CDF) dated 4/1/24, the CDF indicated, Resident 15 was Completely immobile (unable to make even the slightest changes in body or extremity position without assistance) with a Braden Scale Score (an assessment tool used in health care to determine a patient's risk of developing a pressure injury) of 9 (very high risk for skin breakdown). During a review of Resident 15's Physician Orders (PO) dated 3/22/24, the PO indicated, Wound Assessment.Q [every] Week, Site Coccyx [small bone at the bottom of the spine], continue to assess and measure coccyx…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) program (provided by RNA to help maintain or improve mobility for the residents) for five of 35 sampled residents (Resident 31, Resident 354, Resident 19, Resident 1, and Resident 27). 2. Ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) implemented the RNA program. These failures had the potential for reduced mobility and range of motion (ROM - limit to which a part of the body can be moved around a joint) for Resident 31, Resident 354, Resident 19, Resident 1, and Resident 27. Findings: 1a. During an interview on 4/8/24 at 3:22 p.m. with Resident 31's Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated Resident 31 was to get RNA care by a CNA three times a week for ROM (Range of Motion) and did not think that was happening. FM 1 stated she came in the evening to keep the Resident 31's movement (ROM) going. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 8:29 a.m. with Resident 31, Resident 31 stated no staff have done RNA care. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and sanitary food handling practices for: 1. One of three sampled freezers (Freezer #6) 2. One of three sampled refrigerators (Refrigerator #5) when food items were not dated after opening. These failures had the potential to result in decreased palatability (tastiness) and foodborne illnesses for residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/24 at 10:06 a.m. with Dietary Aide (DA) 1 in the kitchen, Freezer #6 had one open four-pound bag of frozen mixed peas and carrots without an open date, one open four-pound bag of sliced carrots without an open date, and one open large half empty bag of tater tots (bite size portions of shredded potatoes) without an open date. DA 1 stated there should have been an open date on all open food items. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/24 at 10:08 a.m. with DA 1 in the kitchen, Refrigerator #5 had a one-gallon jar of mayonnaise that was half empty without an open date, and a one-gallon jar of dill pickle relish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to create a policy and procedure (P&P) to ensure safe food handling/storage guidelines were being followed for food brought to residents by family/visitors from outside of the facility. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness for residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/10/24 at 8:28 a.m. with Activities Director (AD) in the activities room, AD stated the refrigerator was for resident use. Resident refrigerator had ice cream and orange juice, dated with patient labels. AD stated if residents want to store food in the refrigerator, she would store it for them. AD stated she was responsible for cleaning the refrigerator and checking the temperature daily. AD stated she was not sure if the facility had a P&P to ensure safe food handling/storage for food brought to residents from family/visitors. During an interview on 4/10/24 at 3:57 p.m. with Regulatory Specialist (RS), RS stated the facility did not have a P&P regarding food handling/storage of food brought to residents from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform the antibiotic stewardship program (a program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics) for three of three sampled residents (Resident 19, Resident 20, and Resident 27) when the surveillance data collection form and infection surveillance log was not completed. This failure had the potential to result in unmonitored and unnecessary use of antibiotics for Resident 19, Resident 20, and Resident 27. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/9/24 at 9:43 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), the facility's Infection Surveillance Log (ISL), dated March 2024 was reviewed. The ISL indicated the following residents had missing information: a. For Resident 19 - Date of onset of symptoms, criteria for antibiotic use, organism, re-cultured (laboratory test used to check for bacteria or germs) date, and date resolved. b. For Resident 27 - Results of culture, start date of antibiotic treatment, onset date, organism, re-cultured date, and date resolved. c. For Resident 20 - Date of onset of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Tracheostomy [surgical opening in the neck] Tube and inner Cannula [flexible tube] Changing, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 24) did not have a spare tracheostomy tube at the bedside. This failure had the potential to result in a delay in care in the event of an emergency. Findings: During an observation on 4/7/24 at 10:24 a.m., in Resident 24's room, Resident 24 had no ambu bag (manual breathing bag), no emergency blow by (method to supply oxygen) and no spare tracheostomy tube or supplies at bedside. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/9/24 at 8:37 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6, in Resident 24's room, there were no emergency supplies: ambu bag, blow by or spare tracheostomy tube and supplies. LVN 6 stated the supplies are supposed to be hanging at bedside or the hook at the closet area. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 10:49 a.m. with Respiratory Therapist (RT) 2, RT 2 stated when the resident got moved, they did not move…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled resident's (Resident 48) on a psychotropic (used to treat mental health disorders) medication, behavior was monitored consistently. This failure had the potential for staff to not be able to identify when changes occurred in Resident 48's mood/behavior. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's Physician Orders (PO), dated 1/13/24, the PO indicated, Sertraline (a psychotropic medication) daily for depression. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 9:30 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 stated Resident 48 expressed signs of frustrations when she could not communicate her needs. LVN 3 stated Resident 48 was also sad because she was homesick and wanted to go home. During an interview on 4/9/24 at 9:53 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, CNA 5 stated she did not regularly document Resident 48's behavior or mood. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/9/24 at 11:26 a.m. with Pharmacist Supervisor (PS), Resident 48's Drug Regimen Review (DRR), dated 3/27/24 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 45) was provided with gradual dose reduction (GDR - reduce dose gradually over time) of an anti-depressant medication (medication used to reduce depressed mood). This failure had the potential for Resident 45 to continue taking a medication unnecessarily. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/9/24 at 11:46 a.m. with Pharmacist Supervisor (PS), Resident 45's Medical Record (MR) was reviewed. PS stated Resident 45 was admitted on [DATE] and was prescribed Sertraline (medication for depressed mood) on 10/25/23. PS stated the start of review should have been November 2023. PS stated there was no documentation for a GDR. PS stated pharmacy review was suppose to every 3 months. PS stated it can be potentially an unnecessary medication. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Monthly Drug Regimen Review - SCU, dated 10/19/21, the P&P indicated, 6. Gradual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Label and date an Intravenous (IV, in the vein) solution (fluid) and tubing (carries fluid from bag to the vein) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 13). This failure had the potential of medication being administered to the wrong resident and the potential for Resident 13 to acquire an infection due to increased time of use. 2. Date the glucose (sugar) Quality Control (QC) testing strips vial (small container) upon opening on one of four sampled medication carts (Cart 3). Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/7/24 at 10:09 a.m. in Resident 13's room, an IV solution was being administered to Resident 13. The IV solution did not have a patient identifier label or date. The IV tubing did not have a label with a date of first use. During an interview on 4/7/24 at 10:16 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated the IV bag was changed this morning, but she did not get a chance to date it or put a label on it. RN 1 stated the IV bag should have been labeled and the tubing should have been dated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with a means to call for assistance when needed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's needs to not be met, had the potential for feelings of low self-esteem and had the potential for serious harm and other negative consequences. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's CODING SUMMARY (CS), dated 11/14/23, the CS indicated, Resident 1 had a diagnosis of Quadriplegia (life altering condition that results in loss of control of both arms and legs), Tracheostomy (a tube surgically placed into the neck/wind pipe in order to allow air to fill the lungs), chronic respiratory failure and Gastrostomy tube (a tube surgically placed into the stomach to provide nutrition and/or medication). During a review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set – an assessment tool) under the section Functional Abilities and Goals (FG), dated 1/9/24, the FG indicated, Resident 1 was completely dependent of care from staff for: Eating, Oral hygiene, Toileting hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Procedure: Braden Scale and Prevention of Skin Breakdown and PROCEDURE: TURNING SCHEDULE for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) when: 1. Resident 3's heel with redness and discoloration was on a flat pillow. 2. There was no documentation of repositioning for more than 4 hours for Resident 3. These failures had the potential for Resident 3 developing pressure injuries and other negative health consequences. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/16/24 at 2:45 p.m. Charge Nurse (CN) 1 in Resident 3 ' s room, Resident 3 ' s heels were directly on the middle of a flat pillow. CN 1 stated there was redness and discoloration to right heel. CN 1 stated [Resident 3] heels should had been floated (off the pillow). During an interview on 2/29/24 at 2:13 p.m. with Risk & Regulatory Analyst (RRA) 1, RRA 1 stated, Update as of 2/29/24, I received clarification that zero pressure means the area is elevated and not touching a surface like a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure on Team Conferences after a change of condition for seven of eight sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8). This failure resulted in the reason for the change of condition to be unknown, had the potential for the skin conditions to worsen, and had the potential for lapse in continuity of care, and had the potential for harm. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/11/24 at 2:04 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the following Resident Electronic Records (RER) were reviewed: a. Resident 1 – On 10/8/23 Resident 1 was noted to have right breast redness of unknow cause. b. Resident 3 – On 10/21/23 Resident 3 was noted to have left buttock crease redness of unknown cause. On 12/18/23 Resident 3 was noted to have a left buttock sore (a wound that develops on the skin) of unknown cause. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/12/24 at 8:22 a.m. with DON, the following Resident Electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate and meet the needs of six of eight sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 6, Resident 7). This failure had the potential for negative outcomes up to and including harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- comprehensive assessment) under Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS – an assessment tool for cognition), dated 12/6/23, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 14 out of 15 points (cognition is intact.) During an interview on 11/14/23 at 12:11 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated there were not enough nurses in the facility. During an interview on 11/14/23 at 12:42 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated the facility sends CNAs home early toward the end of the shift. CNA 1 stated day shift works from 7 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. CNA 1 stated CNAs were sent home around 6 p.m., 6:30 p.m. or at 7 p.m. CNA stated the facility CNAs were sent home early consistently over the last few months. CNA 1 stated Residents complain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document resident information and follow up assessments after a change of condition for seven of eight sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8). This failure had the potential for worsening skin conditions to go unnoticed, prolong healing, lack in continuity of care and other negative consequences. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/11/24 at 2:04 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the following Resident Electronic Records (RER) were reviewed: a. Resident 1 – On 10/8/23, Resident 1 was noted to have right breast redness of unknow cause. b. Resident 3 – On 10/21/23, Resident 3 was noted to have left buttock crease redness of unknown cause. On 12/18/23, Resident 3 was noted to have a left buttock sore (a wound that develops on the skin) of unknown cause. DON stated there was no documentation or follow up assessment documentation in regard to size or any other detailed information noted for Resident 1, and Resident 3 ' s identified skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were: 1. Answered timely for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). 2. Within reach for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) These failures had the potential for unmet care needs and negatively impact Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3's safety and dignity. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 2' s Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 8/27/23, the MDS indicated, Resident 2' s BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 14 (a score of 13-15 suggests the resident is cognitively intact). During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/8/23, at 8:36 a.m., with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated, I look at the clock and I have a very good memory. A clock was observed on Resident 2 ' s wall. Resident 2 stated call lights were being answered late. Resident 2 stated the longest she had waited for call light to be answered was 45 minutes. Resident 2 stated, When I need to be changed it makes me frustrated and angry sometimes because I see LVNs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent sufficient staffing to meet the needs for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure resulted in unmet care needs, and negatively impacted the safety, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 8/27/23, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 14 (a score of 13-15 suggests the resident is cognitively intact). During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/8/23 at 8:36 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated she will not get changed after 5 a.m. in morning until they come back at 10 or 11 a.m. Resident 2 stated the facility sends the staff home early and this has been going on for a while mostly in the mornings. Resident 2 stated, When we complain they always say the hospital is run like a business, so we have to cut…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report two separate allegations of abuse, for one of four sample residents (Resident 1). These failures resulted in delayed investigation of abuse for Resident 1 and had the potential for Resident 1 to be at risk for further abuse. Findings: During an interview on 11/8/23 at 1:47 p.m. with Family Member (FM 1), FM 1 stated Resident 1 told her certified nursing assistant (CNA 5) hit him and called him a mother fucker. FM 1 stated on Wednesday FM 1 reported the abuse to Registered Nurse Manager (RNM). FM 1 stated, I told [RNM] [Resident 1] is telling me he is being abused. FM 1 stated this all started three weeks ago. FM 1 stated RNM and Registered Nurse (RN 1) went to Resident 1 ' s room and Resident 1 told RNM and RN 1 about the alleged abuse. During an interview on 11/9/23 at 9:06 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated Certified nursing Assistant (CNA 4) called him queer. Resident 1 stated he has not reported it. Resident 1 stated CNA 5 hit him on his leg, Resident 1 believes CNA 5 hit him intentionally to hurt him.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure for TEAM CONFERENCES for six of six sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5 and Resident 6) when: 1. Resident 5 and Resident 6 had new onset pressure ulcers (wounds caused by prolonged pressure). 2. Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3 and Resident 4 had fall incidents. These failures resulted in Care Plans (CP - helps nurses and other care team members organize aspects of patient care according to a timeline) not being updated and had the potential for the cause of the falls and pressure ulcers to not be identified, had the potential for increased risk of pressure injury and falls for all residents and had the potential for lack of appropriate prevention/care to be implemented resulting in negative consequences. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/23/23 at 11:32 a.m. with Quality Assurance Professional (QAP), Resident 5 and Resident 6's Electronic Medical Chart (EMC), was reviewed. The EMC indicated, Resident 5 had a left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$123,442 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $77,740 — penalty dated 2025-07-03
  • $45,702 — penalty dated 2024-10-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-12 for 59 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-19 for 56 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVENTIST HEALTH — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WELLS, JASONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/23/2023
BANKS, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
CHERRY, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
DAVIS, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
FEHR, JOYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2020
FREEDMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
HEINRICH, KERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
HOFHEINS, TODDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2021
INNOCENT, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
NEWTON, BRADFORDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/16/2021
OCAMPO, LUCYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
REINER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
SALAZAR, VELINOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019
WOODSON, MARCIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/31/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056426. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next