No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adventist Health Sonora - D/P SNF

179 South Fairview Lane, Sonora, CA 95370 · Non profit - Church related · 68 certified beds · (209) 536-3779 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 536-3779 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2026Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
193 Fairview Ln Ste C · (209) 536-5130 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
220 W Stockton St · (209) 536-3800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Save Mart0.4 mi
130 Stockton St · (209) 532-3478 · Call to confirm hours
Park
663 Woods Creek Dr · (209) 532-7725 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
412 W Stockton St · (209) 532-3517

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.2%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.4%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.0%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.5%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.1%12.0%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.172.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.951.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

1.11
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.75
RN hoursweekends
28.4%
Total nursing turnover
22.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 62.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.00 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.25 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-19)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 1 struck Resident 2 in the face with a fist on 1/8/26. This failure resulted in Resident 2 suffering pain from a bleeding split lip and ongoing fear and anxiety that Resident 1 might hit Resident 2 again. A review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, Resident Face Sheet (a document used in healthcare settings to compile essential information about a resident, facilitating effective care and communication among healthcare professionals), dated 10/21/25, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to vascular dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS is a 0-15-point assessment used in long-term care to measure cognitive function, specifically focusing on short-term memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1c. Review of Resident 33's physician's order for lorazepam dated 8/16/24, indicated, .Start date 8/16/24 .End Date .Open Ended .lorazepam .tablet .0.5 mg [mg-a unit of measure] .1 tab .Every 12 hours .PRN . Review of the document did not include an end date for the PRN lorazepam. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/18/25, at 1:56 p.m., the DON reviewed Resident 33's clinical record and confirmed the order for PRN lorazepam with a start date of 8/16/24. The DON acknowledged the order had no end date. The DON confirmed Resident 33's physician progress notes did not contain a rational or justification for Resident 33's use of the PRN lorazepam. The DON stated the PRN lorazepam should have had a physician progress note that included a justification for the medication's continued use and the lorazepam order should have had a stop date. 1d. Review of Resident 49's physician's order for lorazepam dated 8/21/24, indicated, .Start Date .2/17/2025 .End Date .Open Ended .lorazepam .tablet 0.5 mg .1 tablet .Every 12 Hours .PRN for anxiety . Review of the document noted no end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service for 57 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. A one-gallon plastic container of [NAME] wine (a type of wine used for cooking) had a sticker which indicated the product was past the used by date (the last day for food to be consumed or eaten); 2. Four 16 ounce plastic containers of Tahini paste (a smooth, savory condiment made from ground, hulled sesame seeds) lacked dates that indicated a recieved date (a date a food item was received in a facility), a manufacturer's expiration date (the date when the maker of a product indicates it was no longer expected to be at its optimal quality or may become unsafe to eat), the date the product was opened, or a use by date; and 3. Seven kitchen cutting boards contained deep grooves and had visible stains. These failures had the potential to put residents who received food from the kitchen at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use its Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI- a data driven and proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) program to address PRN (given as needed or requested) psychotropic medication (a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) use, for a census of 57 residents, when the facility did not collect data (information) or identify corrective measures for PRN psychotropic medication use without a stop date (date indicated on physicians orders for when the use of the medication would end) and/or without a documented rationale for ongoing use of PRN psychotropic medication in the affected residents' medical record. These failures led to ongoing PRN psychotropic medication use without proper documentation and justification in the affected residents' medical record and had the potential to negatively impact the affected residents' psychosocial health and well-being. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/19/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures for a census of 57 residents when: 1. The bathroom toilets were dirty in both Resident 27, Resident 54, Resident 14, and Resident 5's shared bathroom; and in Resident 50 and Resident 37's shared bathroom along with the sink; 2. Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 did not store Resident 15's used feeding tube syringe (a medical device that helps deliver liquid nutrients, medications, or fluids directly into a resident's stomach/intestines via an external tube) back in the manufactures packaging or a sealed bag; and, 3. LN 7 did not perform hand hygiene prior to and after entering and exiting resident rooms during a medication pass and/or in between passing medications to Resident 5, Resident 17, Resident 42, Resident 407, and Resident 39. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the transmission and spread of infection among staff and residents of the facility as well as negatively impacting residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1a. During a concurrent observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident rights were honored for one out of twelve sampled residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5's repeated requests to speak to the dietician on 4/2/25, 5/7/25, and 6/4/25 were not honored. These failures denied Resident 5 of her right to a dignified existence, failed to encourage Resident 5's independence, and prevented Resident 5's dietary preferences from being addressed. Findings: A review of documents titled, RESIDENT COUNCIL [a gathering of residents to discuss and address concerns, share information, and make decisions about their living environment] REPORT dated 4/2/25, 5/7/25, and 6/4/25, indicated Resident 5 repeatedly requested to see the dietician. On the same documents under item PLAN OF ACTION, the following was noted: - On 4/2/25 staff documented, .Request to see Dietician: [Resident 5] . - On 5/7/25 staff documented, Resident 5's request to see the dietician was .referred to Activities Supervisor and nursing . - On 6/4/25 staff documented, .Sent email for Resident 5 to see Dietician .Given to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide radiology services (a branch of medicine that uses imaging technology to diagnose and treat disease) for one resident (Resident 1) in a sample of five residents when the Medical Doctor (MD) ordered an x-ray (a photographic or digital image of the internal composition of a part of the body) three days after a known injury and the x-ray was not done until five days after the injury. These failures put Resident 1 at risk for increased pain and delayed the identification of a left finger fracture (a partial or complete break in a bone) that could lead to loss of normal finger use. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with the Practice Administrator (PA) of Resident 1 ' s electronic medical record on 5/20/25, at 12:49 p.m., the PA stated Resident 1 sustained an injury to his left hand and fourth finger on 11/8/25, orders for ice and splint (device used to support and protect a body part, often one with a fracture or injury) were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a total of 59 residents who received food from the kitchen when: 1. A half-filled pancake mix container was expired and available for use in the kitchen; and 2. A double oven located in the kitchen was not clean. These failures placed facility residents at risk of food borne illnesses (eating or drinking something that is contaminated with germs that can cause illness) and had a potential of fire hazard. Findings: 1. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 5/6/24, at 9:28 AM, the Production Supervisor (PS) verified a half-filled pancake mix container on a rack in the kitchen was labeled with use by date of 4/9/24. The PS stated it was expired. The PS further stated expired food should be thrown away and should not be available for use. During an interview on 5/6/24, at 3:50 PM, the PS stated expired food should not be available to use for food safety. The PS stated there was a risk of serving expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop baseline care plans for all of the identified problems noted on admission, within 48 hours of admission, to address resident-specific care needs for 3 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 309, Resident 310, and Resident 311), when Resident 309, Resident 310, and Resident 311's admission documentation indicated potential health care problem areas, but care plans were not developed for all of the identified problem areas within 48 hours of admission. These failures resulted in Resident 309, Resident 310, and Resident 311 having the potential for bodily harm, injury, and had the potential for not providing effective and person-centered care for the residents. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 309's Resident Face Sheet, indicated Resident 309 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 309's admission Assessment Sheet, indicated Resident 309 had a speech impairment (slur), vision impairment, hearing impairment, falls in the past thirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accident hazards for 12 of 60 residents (Resident 2, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 30, Resident 34, Resident 40, Resident 41, Resident 44, Resident 50, Resident 54, Resident 55, Resident 56, and Resident 309), when: 1. Resident 20 and Resident 40's wander guard (a bracelet that triggers alarms when resident attempts to leave the facility unattended) were not monitored for functioning, 2. Wander guard system (a device/sensor that trigger alarms if a wander guard wearer approaches near it) was not working at the front gate in Unit 7, 3. Wander guard system was not checked monthly for functioning; and, 4. Staff was not present during lunch on 5/7/24 in the dining room in Unit 7. These failures had the potential for Resident 20, Resident 40, Resident 41, Resident 50, and Resident 55 for elopement (running away/wandering off without staff knowledge that poses serious safety risk), accidents, injury, and had the potential for Resident 2, Resident 21, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe medication monitoring practices for a census of 60 when: 1. Vital Signs (or VS, markers such as heartbeat or Heart Rate [HR] and Blood Pressure [or BP, the pressure of blood flow into the arteries]) hold parameters (conditions in which nursing staff to hold the medication and/or call the doctor) were not ordered for cardiac (heart) and blood pressure medications for safe monitoring for Resident 28, Resident 11, and Resident 2; and, 2. Resident 28's high risk (drug with risk of adverse effects even with appropriate dose and indication) blood thinner medication, called Apixaban (or Eliquis, used to treat or prevent blood clot and can cause bleeding) did not have monitoring parameters in the Medication Administration Record (or MAR, a document that listed drugs administered and the daily nursing monitoring at the point of drug administration) to assess or prevent the risk of bleeding. These failures could contribute to unsafe monitoring and medication use. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 28's MAR, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe use and monitoring of psychotropic (mind altering drugs) medication in 3 out of 5 sampled residents (Resident 209, Resident 20, and Resident 1) reviewed for unnecessary medication when: 1. Resident 209's specific behavior monitoring, and expression of distress was listed as resistant to care which did not pose a harm to resident or others when the root cause of resistance to care may have been an attempt to communicate unmet needs and a discomfort unable to articulate to nursing staff, 2. Resident 209 and Resident 20's psychotropic drug dosage range did not fit the usual dose range for elderly residents with dementia diagnosis and were not discussed with Resident's Representatives; and 3. Resident 209 and Resident 1's anxiety medication called lorazepam (or Ativan, medication used to treat anxiety) for PRN or as needed basis (PRN or Latin word pro re nata means as the thing is needed) was renewed for 6 months or longer without any clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to a dignified existence was honored for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 309), when Resident 309's urinary catheter bag (a drainage bag attached to a catheter (tube) that is inside the bladder to collect urine) was exposed and was not placed in a dignity bag (a bag used to the cover and hold the catheter drainage/collection bag so it is not visible) in the dining room. This failure had the potential of emotional harm for Resident 309. Findings: During an observation on 5/7/24, at 1:14 PM, Resident 309 ate lunch in the dining room. Resident 309's urinary catheter bag was exposed, was not in a dignity bag, and was hanging on a walker. During an interview on 5/7/24, at 1:18 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) 7 stated residents who ate lunch in the dining room were alert. LN 7 confirmed Resident 309's urinary bag was not in a dignity bag in the dining room. LN 7 stated a resident's urinary bag had to be placed in a dignity bag for privacy. LN 7 further stated, People don't like other people see…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a home-like environment for two of eighteen sampled residents (Resident 47 and Resident 57), when Resident 47's personal items were displayed on Resident 57's side of the room and Resident 57's items were displayed on Resident 47's side of the room. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 47 and Resident 57's psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 47's Resident Face Sheet, indicated, she was admitted to the facility in 2023, with diagnoses which included dementia. A review of Resident 47's care plan dated 5/7/24, indicated, .Problem .memory/recall problem R/T [related to] dementia .avoid change in routine .Provide familiar items in room . A review of Resident 47's care plan dated 5/2/24, indicated, .Psychosocial Well- Being .Actual or Potential Adjustment Impairment .Provide privacy, personal objects. Encourage family to bring items of personal meaning to increase comfort . A review of Resident 47's clinical document titled, RESIDENT INCIDENT REVIEW, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of written Notice of Transfer or Discharge of a facility-initiated transfer to the appropriate parties for one of one sampled resident (Resident 13), when Resident 13 or Resident 13's representative (RR) and the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a patient rights advocate) were not notified in writing of Resident 13's transfer to the emergency room (ER) on 3/11/24. This failure resulted in the State LTC Ombudsman not being informed of the resident's transfer, removed the opportunity for the State LTC Ombudsman to advocate on the resident's behalf, deprived the resident to be informed of resident rights regarding transfer/discharge, and had the potential for Resident 13 being inappropriately discharged . Findings: Review of Resident 13's SNF [Skilled Nursing Facility]/LTC Status Notification record dated 3/11/24, indicated Resident 13 was transferred to the ER on [DATE] for intractable pain (a permanent severe pain condition) of left lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their bilateral hearing aids and failed to assist in locating and/or arranging for audiologist (ear doctor) referral consult services for two of two sampled residents (Resident 311 and Resident 309) when: 1. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) asked Resident 311's wife to take Resident 311's hearing aids home; and, 2. The facility did not assist or refer for follow-up auditory services for Resident 309 to obtain hearing aids. These failures had the potential to impede Resident 311's and Resident 309's maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being due to not being able to hear adequately during a conversation. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 311's Initial Care Plan, dated 2/24/24 [sic], indicated, .Initial information .Hearing .Hearing adequate .Hearing impaired . was marked. Review of Resident 311's undated Resident Belongings Sheet, indicated that Resident 311 had a right and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services (activities to assist residents with maintaining or improving physical function) for one of twenty residents (Resident 310) referred to the RNA program (Restorative Nursing Aide; administers restorative services) when, a recommendation for RNA services was written for Resident 310 on 4/23/24 by the Physical Therapy (PT) Department, but was not relayed to the skilled nursing facility to initiate. This failure resulted in the potential for Resident 310 for not attaining and maintaining their highest possible level of physical and functional well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 310's Resident Face Sheet, indicated Resident 310 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 310's Physician Order Report, indicated that Resident 310 had an admitting diagnosis which included but not limited to cerebral infarction due to embolism unspecified (blood supply to the brain is blocked or reduced and prevents brain tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of two sampled residents (Resident 311 and Resident 48) when: 1. There was no oxygen safety signage posted outside Resident 311's room; and, 2. Oxygen tubing was not labeled and was not changed out within seven days for Resident 48 and Resident 311's oxygen tubing was not labeled. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 48 and Resident 311 to have complications related to improper treatment while receiving oxygen therapy. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 311's Physician Order Report, indicated that Resident 311 had an admitting diagnosis which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where you don't have enough oxygen in the tissues in your body). During an interview and observation on 5/6/24, at 10:05 a.m., Resident 311 was observed in his room sitting in a wheelchair next to his bed and was receiving oxygen at one point five liters per minute (LPM) via nasal canula…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Physical Therapy (PT- the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as message, heat treatment, and exercise) as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 309) with physical therapy orders when, Medical Director (MD) 1 had ordered PT on 4/26/24 for Resident 309, but the services had not yet been provided by the PT department. This failure resulted in the potential for Resident 309 for not attaining and maintaining their highest possible level of physical and functional well-being. This failure also had the potential to delay necessary treatment and delay necessary assistive services needed for Resident 309. Findings: Review of Resident 309's Resident Face Sheet, indicated Resident 309 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included but not limited to history of falling, other sequelae of cerebral infarction (stroke; blood supply to the brain is blocked or reduced and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection prevention practices for a census of 60 when: 1. When Licensed Nurse (LN) 8 carried the stock bottle of test strips (test strip used to measure blood sugar) into an isolation room (restricted room to prevent the spread of infection) without cleaning or sanitization before and after use, 2. Resident 309's urinal (a bottle used for urination) was not labeled with Resident 309's name or another identifier; and, 3. Resident 309 's urinary bag (a drainage bag attached to a catheter (tube) that is inside the bladder to collect urine) was hanging on Resident 30's walker. These failed practices could contribute to spread of infection in the facility. Finding: During a medication administration observation with LN 8, in the facility's Unit 7, on 5/7/24, at 11:25 AM, LN 8 gathered the blood sugar measurement supplies including a glucometer (a device that measured blood sugar), test strip bottle (stock bottle of test strip; when single test strip was soaked with blood, inserted into glucometer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 2) who used the Sara Steady (a manual sit-to-stand transfer aid that enables one caregiver to transfer patients safely and with ease) device environment was free of accident hazards when staff left Resident 2 unattended while the Sara Steady device was in front of Resident 2. This failure had the potential to place Resident 2 at risk of falls and possible injury. Findings: During an interview on 3/21/24 at 10:15 am with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated that she placed the Sara Steady device in front of Resident 2 while she used the commode (a portable toilet or a chair with a container underneath) in the room. CNA 1 further stated she would leave the call light within reach for Resident 2 to call her when she was done using the commode or the restroom. During an interview on 3/21/24 at 10:30 am with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated the residents who used the Sara…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) with self-release seatbelts, remained free from a physical restraint, when Resident 1 was not able to buckle and unbuckle the seatbelt consistently on her own. Staff applied and removed Resident 1's seatbelt rather than reminding Resident 1 to apply the safety belt on her own per Resident 1's care plan intervention implemented on 2/6/24 related to the seatbelt use, following a fall in the bathroom on 2/2/24. This failure resulted in loss of freedom of movement for Resident 1, with the possibility of injury and psychosocial distress. Findings: During an interview on 2/20/24, at 4:12 pm, Resident 1 stated that she could not unbuckle the seatbelt and could only ever do it one time during the demonstration of how to use the seatbelt. Resident 1 stated after the demonstration she tried to unbuckle the seatbelt, but she could not do it. Resident 1 confirmed that she could also not buckle the seatbelt on her own. Resident 1 stated she felt perturbed [feeling anxiety or concern; unsettled]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from sexual abuse, when Resident 2 who had a known history of inappropriate sexual comments and gestures was sitting in close proximity to her with no staff supervision. This failure resulted in Resident 2 rubbing Resident 1's inner thigh and placed other vulnerable residents residing in the facility at risk for abuse. Findings: According to the admission record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early this year with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situation) and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system characterized by shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with mobility). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated, 9/12/23 indicated Resident 1 scored 7 out of 15 on the cognitive assessment, which indicated she had severe memory impairment and cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a summary of investigation of an alleged sexual abuse to the Department within five (5) working days of an incident for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure placed Resident 1 at potential risk for further abuse. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility early this year with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situation) and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system characterized by shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with mobility). Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included anxiety and heart disease. A review of Resident 1's nursing progress note, dated 12/3/23 and timed at 5:10 p.m., indicated Resident 2 was observed rubbing [Resident 1's] inner thigh up to her groin area when they were sitting beside each other near the nursing station. The nurse documented the incident was witnessed by two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1 and CNA 4). The note indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for a census of 50 when: 1. Staff placed Resident 15 and Resident 47 in double incontinence briefs; and, 2. Staff stood while assisting Resident 17 with meals. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' psychosocial well-being and physical health. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 15's admission Record indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection. A review of Resident 47's admission Record indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 2023. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/15/23, at 6:10 a.m., with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 5 in Resident 15's room, CNA 5 confirmed she removed two incontinence briefs as she changed Resident 15. CNA 5 stated she did not know who placed double briefs on Resident 15 because she had started her shift late. CNA 5 further stated the expectation was for all residents to wear only one incontinence brief. CNA 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that petty cash was available for a total of twenty residents who had a trust account with the facility, when personal funds were not available after business hours or on weekends. This failure resulted in personal funds not being available after business hours, with the potential to negatively effect a resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an interview on 3/16/23, at 9:10 a.m., Resident 28 stated to obtain resident held money from the facility a request had to be made Monday through Friday. Resident 28 stated if you requested money late on Friday then you would not receive your money request until Monday. Resident 28 stated to have money on the weekend a request would have had to be made ahead of time. Resident 28 explained, if you did not request the money in advanced then you would be out of luck for the weekend. During an interview on 3/13/23, at 9:48 a.m., Resident 25 stated she was unaware if she could obtain money on the weekend. During an interview on 3/15/23, at 9:16 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of nine residents (Resident 27, Resident 34, and Resident 40) who required assistance to maintain mobility received required services, when: 1. Resident 27's hand contracture (muscles, tendons, joints, or other tissues tighten or shorten causing a deformity which can result in pain and loss of movement) cushion was not present in both hands; and, 2. Resident 34 and Resident 40 were improperly discharged from their functional management interventions (nursing intervention to increase or maintain resident's mobility and to prevent further decline in mobility). These failures had the potential risk for Resident 27, Resident 34 and Resident 40 to not maintain their highest level of range of motion (ROM-the degree of movement that occurs at a given joint during an exercise) and mobility functioning. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/13/23, at 9:23 a.m., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 confirmed Resident 27 had a blue contracture cushion in the right hand only. CNA 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate and sufficient nursing staff to ensure the Restorative Nursing Aide program (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatments and services were available for a census of 50. This deficient practice had the potential to decrease the residents' range of motion and mobility, which could affect the residents' overall function. Findings: During an interview on 3/15/23, at 11:44 a.m., licensed nurse (LN) 1 stated the facility did not have an RNA program. LN 1 further stated the CNAs were responsible for completing certain mobility interventions for residents on certain days and had to document on a resident's flowsheet. During an interview on 3/15/23, at 1:23 p.m., LN 3 stated the facility had no RNA program for at least 6 months. LN 3 further stated sometimes functional management interventions were not possible to complete depending on how many CNAs were on the floor. LN 3 explained certain functional management interventions were removed because they did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement antibiotic (medication used to treat bacterial infections) use protocols within the antibiotic stewardship program for a census of 50 residents when; 1. No antibiotic use protocol was developed and implemented; 2. Minimum use criteria for the use of antibiotics was not applied for Resident 6 and Resident 45; and, 3. Resident 21's antibiotic order did not have an end date. These failures increased residents' risk to develop infections with bacterial organisms resistive to certain antibiotics (MDRO; multidrug-resistant organisms, germs that are resistant to many antibiotics) with the potential to result in adverse outcomes (allergic reactions, organ damage, subsequent infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms, and clostridium difficile infection(bacteria that causes an infection of the large intestine)) associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of antibiotics. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/15/23, at 11:12 a.m., facility documents titled FACILITY POLICY:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs were honored for two of 21 sampled residents (Resident 27 and Resident 30) when: 1. There was no documented attempt of an alternative call light used for Resident 27; and, 2. Resident 27 and Resident 30's call light were not within reach. These failure had the potential for Resident 27's and Resident 30's needs to go unmet with the potential to cause physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/13/23, at 9:23 a.m., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 stated Resident 27 was unable to use the call light and was unable to speak. During an interview on 3/16/23, at 2:48 p.m., the Practice Administrator (PA) confirmed there was no record that other calls light types had been attempted in the past for Resident 27. During an interview on 3/15/23, at 4:29 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did not recall if other types of call lights had been tried in the past for Resident 27. The DON stated the facility had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individual financial records were received on a quarterly basis for twenty residents who had a trust account with the facility, when there was no documented evidence that quarterly statements were provided to residents with facility managed funds. This failure had the potential for Resident 25 to be unaware of the amount of money available. Findings: During an interview on 3/13/23, at 9:48 a.m., when asked if a quarterly statement was received from the facility regarding money held in the trust account, Resident 25 stated she had never received anything, but would like to be aware of what money she had. During an interview on 3/15/23, at 9:16 a.m., the Practice Administrator (PA) stated the facility held resident trust accounts for a total of twenty residents. The PA confirmed Resident 25 had a trust account with the facility. The PA stated that residents who had a trust account received quarterly statements, with the last statement being provided in January of 2023. The PA stated it was important to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a process to provide a beneficiary notification form when two of two sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 9) did not receive the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, a form which indicates that Medicare might not pay for skilled services and how to appeal). This failure had the potential for Resident 5, Resident 9 and their representatives to be uninformed regarding their specific rights and protections related to financial liability for potential incurred medical expenses as well as the right to appeal. Findings: A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2022. A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 2022. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/15/23, at 3:12 p.m., the DON confirmed the facility did not provide a NOMNC to Resident 5 and Resident 9. The DON stated the facility was not aware a NOMNC needed to be provided because they handled very few…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention for two of 21 sampled residents (Resident 27 and Resident 30) when the care plan intervention of a stop sign barrier (a yellow banner with a stop sign on it that was placed across the doorway) was not in place over Resident 27's and Resident 30's doorway. This failure had the potential for Resident 27 and Resident 30's privacy to be invaded by unwanted persons, with a potential risk to safety. Findings: During an observation on 3/13/23, at 9:15 a.m., a stop sign barrier was hanging from the right side of the door frame of Resident 30's and Resident 27's shared room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/13/23, at 9:23 a.m., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 confirmed Resident 30 and Resident 27 were in bed. CNA 1 confirmed the stop sign barrier was not across the doorway of Resident 30 and Resident 27's room. CNA 1 stated the stop sign barrier was used to prevent residents who wandered from going into other residents' rooms. During an interview on 3/15/23, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned fall precautions for Resident 10 and Resident 17, when the beds were not in low position and Resident 10's call light was not in reach. This failure had the potential to result in physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: During an interview on 3/14/23, at 9:50 AM, in Resident 10's room, Resident 10 stated she fell in November, which resulted in a shoulder injury that required surgery to repair. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/14/23, at 9:57 AM, in Unit 6 nursing station, Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 stated Resident 10 had care planned interventions for fall risk and stated if Resident 10's bed was not in the lowest position, she could fall and hurt herself again. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/15/23, at 8:28 AM, in Resident 10's room, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 4 checked to see if Resident 10's bed was in the lowest position. CNA 4 pressed the bed controller, and Resident 10's bed moved lower. CNA 4 stated the risk to the resident was they could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of twenty-one sampled residents (Resident 30) had access to fluid to maintain hydration when, Resident 30's drinking fluids were not within reach. This failure had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 30's health (dehydration) with the potential to result in physical harm (fall). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/13/23, at 9:23 a.m., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 confirmed Resident 30 was in bed and Resident 30's tray table with drinks on it was about two feet from the bed. CNA 1 confirmed Resident 30's call light was also not within reach. During an interview on 3/15/23, at 2:10 p.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 stated resident drinks were located on the bedside table and the bedside table should be within the resident's reach. LN 1 stated the drinks should be with in reach so if the resident wants a drink they can get one. LN 1 explained a resident could try and reach for a drink and fall out of the bed. During an interview on 3/15/23, at 4:29 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of twenty-one sampled residents (Resident 21), when Resident 21's oxygen order had no indicated flow rate (the volume of oxygen delivered over time). This failure had the potential to result in negative impacts on Resident 21's health and safety including risks for ineffective oxygen therapy, and respiratory distress. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnoses which included dependence on supplemental oxygen. During an observation on 3/13/23, at 1:19 p.m., Resident 21 was observed in his room with the oxygen concentrator on and running at a flow rate of 2 liters per minute (LPM, unit of measurement for oxygen delivery) via nasal cannula (a small flexible tube that contains two open prongs intended to sit just inside the nostrils). During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/13/23, at 1:24 p.m., with licensed nurse (LN) 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/15/23, at 11:42 a.m., the Warehouse Distribution Technician (WDT) was observed on Unit 7 at the medication storage room door holding a red container. The WDT entered the code on the door keypad and walked into the medication storage room. The WDT exited the medication storage without the red container. The WDT stated, .I put the box on the counter in the back of the med room. If a nurse is available, I give it to them. If not I put it in the med room. I don't want to leave it on the counter where a resident could get it. The WDT further stated he was provided the code to the medication room one year ago by the individual who trained him. The WDT confirmed he was not licensed personnel nor was his trainer. The WDT looked at the sign on the medication room door that reads: Restricted Entry-Licensed Staff Only and stated, I should not go in there, I'm not licensed staff, I didn't know. During an interview on 3/15/23, at 11:59 a.m., LN 2 was unaware the WDT had the code to the medication storage room. LN 2 confirmed the risk of WDT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices for a census of 50 when: 1. One staff member did not follow infection control practices when Resident 20's wound dressing was changed; and, 2. One kitchen staff member was not wearing his mask correctly during the tray line prep. These failures had the potential risk for the development and transmission of diseases and infection to residents in the facility. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in mid-2022 with diagnoses which included a non-pressure chronic ulcer (an open wound with an exposed implanted device) of left lower leg, osteomyelitis (bone infection), and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, a bacteria that is responsible for several difficult to treat infections) infection. A review of Residents 20's Treatment Flowsheet indicated, .wound left knee once a day remove dressing, clean with chlorhexidine [topical antiseptic] and irrigate with NS [normal saline, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled resident's (Resident 42) medical record indicated if immunizations were received and/or refused and education was provided on the risks and benefits of the immunization when, Resident 42's medical record did not indicate if the pneumococcal vaccine (protects against serious and potentially fatal pneumococcal infections caused by bacteria) was offered and/or refused and there was no documented evidence of the risk versus benefit education being provided. This failure had the potential for Resident 42 to go unvaccinated with the risk for serious health related illness and/or death and Resident 42 and/or Resident 42's responsible party to not make an informed decision in regards to the risk versus benefits of receiving the vaccine. Findings: During an interview on 3/15/23, at 2:28 p.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) confirmed there was no record of the pneumoccocal vaccine being offered to Resident 42, no documented refusal of the vaccine, and no documentation to show that the risks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVENTIST HEALTH — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.6+1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MCCULLOCH, GREGORYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/05/2014
JAHN, ANDREWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/03/2014
FREEDMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/26/2016
GABRIEL, MELODYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2015
GRAHAM, RICARDOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2015
HEINRICH, KERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/16/2014
INNOCENT, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2015
PEDERSEN, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/16/2017
REINER, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/14/2014
REINER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/16/2017
RIPPEY, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2015
SALAZAR, VELINOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/15/2015
WING, BILLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/31/2014
JOBE, MEREDITHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/31/2014
WAGNER, JACKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/31/2014
ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/WESTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/16/1980

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555209. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next