The Meadows Of Napa Valley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 251 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 37.9 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.04 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 188) from an air mattress that deflated, when the facility was aware that these air mattress types had a risk of deflating. This failure resulted in Resident 188 falling out of bed, and sustaining a right thigh bone fracture. Resident 188 was transferred to the hospital and passed away nine days later. Findings: Review of Resident 188's admission Record indicated Resident 188 admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses including heart disease and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Review of Resident 188's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/26/22, indicated Resident 188 had short and long-term memory problems, and her cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 188 required extensive assistance from two people for bed mobility (how a resident moves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the shower room in hallway 400 of the facility was kept in good working condition when the water in one of the showers did not drain properly and broken tile with sharp edges was found in the shower room floor. These failures increased the potential for residents to experience falls when water pooled and abrasions on their feet. Findings: During an interview on 11/04/24 at 2:14 p.m., Resident 19 stated the water in the 400 hallway shower room did not drain well. Resident 19 showed the Surveyor the shower room she was referring to. During an observation on 11/04/24 between 2:37 p.m. and 2:42 p.m., in the 400 hallway shower room, the surveyor ran the water at full force for 5 minutes. After five minutes, the water created a pool on the shower floor. It took 5 minutes for the water to drain completely. During this observation the shower room floor had broken tile which created sharp edges capable of causing injuries to residents' feet. During a concurrent interview and observation with Maintenance Staff E…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of twelve sampled residents (Resident 19) wore her hearing aids daily to be able to communicate effectively with staff. This finding had the potential for Resident 19 to experience difficulty communicating with others and have feelings of isolation and loss of control. Findings: Record review of Resident 19's Face Sheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a process that reduces blood flow to the brain). Record review of a care plan for Resident 19 indicated, Hearing Ability: Adequate with a device .Hearing Appliances: Left and Right Hearing Aid. During a concurrent interview and observation on 11/4/24 at 2:24 p.m., Resident 19 stated she could not understand the speech of the person conducting the bible studies at the facility. Resident 19 stated her hearing aids were not working, and she did not know what was wrong with them. Resident 19 stated she needed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision needed to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident 196) of three sampled residents when Resident 196 was left on the toilet and the staff member left Resident 196's room. This failure resulted in Resident 196 sustaining a spinal cord compression (when pressure is applied to the spinal cord causing swelling and restricted blood flow to the nerves and spinal cord) and death. Findings: A review of Resident 196's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnosis which included: acute on chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure (a sudden worsening of a pre-existing condition where the heart struggles to both effectively pump blood out and fill with blood properly), difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength). A review of Resident 196's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 8/19/24 at 2:03 p.m. indicated within the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and disposal of medications when loose units of unidentified pills and an expired bubble pack of narcotics were found in one medication cart. This failure put residents at risk of receiving expired medications that were potentially ineffective and unsafe for use and prevented prompt identification of possible loss and/or diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber) of controlled drugs. Findings: During an observation of Medication Cart 1 on 11/6/24 at 10:09 a.m., four units of loose pills (two white cut pills, one yellow round pill, and one white oval pill) were found among the cart's drawer bins. All four pills were unlabeled and unidentifiable. Further inspection of the cart's narcotic bin revealed a bubble pack affixed with a label that indicated, Oxycodone 5MG TAB . Exp: 11/01/24 . There were five pills left in the bubble pack. During a concurrent interview and observation of the cart on 11/6/24 at 10:28…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used and understood the need for appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one resident (Resident 5) of five sampled residents for infection control, who had a medical status that required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes). This failure had the potential to increase the risk of spread of MDROs and other infections among vulnerable residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 11/5/24 at 3:29 p.m., Resident 5 was calling for staff assistance to be transferred from her wheelchair to the toilet. Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) L and CNA M donned gloves as they entered the room to help Resident 5. A sign posted on Resident 5's door indicated, ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS .PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure outdated drugs and biologicals were disposed of properly, when: 1. Two bottles of expired house stock medications (Over-the-counter medications) were found in the facility's medication room stored with other active house stock medications. This had the potential to result in inadvertently administering expired medications to the residents of the facility, which could have caused them harm, or lack of medication therapy. 2. Three controlled medications (Substances regulated by Federal law) were found in the facility's medication carts for two residents that had been discharged more than one week prior to the observation (Resident 139 & Resident 26), stored with other controlled drugs. This had the potential to result in drug diversion among facility staff. 3. Several expired blood collection lab tubes and intravenous tubing (For administration of fluids and medications through a person's veins) were found in the facility medication room. This had the potential to result in inaccurate and contaminated lab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an abuse allegation for one of six sampled residents (Resident 14) was reported to the required authorities within the appropriate timeframes established by the Federal regulations. This failure had the potential to result in financial abuse, frustration and emotional harm for Resident 14. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (A lung disease characterized by chronic obstruction of lung airflow that interferes with normal breathing and is not fully reversible), according to the facility's Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 14's MDS (Minimum Data Set-A resident assessment tool) dated 12/16/22, indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) was 13, which indicated her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the required daily staffing information timely per the Federal regulations for Skilled Nursing Facilities. This had the potential to result in the inability for residents and visitors to determine if the facility was having staffing shortages, for advocacy purposes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/23/23 at 9:38 a.m., it was noted that the daily staffing information posted in the facility nursing station contained the daily posting from the day before, 1/22/23. There were no staffing postings for 1/23/23 with the current staffing information. Licensed Nurse A, who was present during the observation, confirmed the staffing posting was from yesterday. She stated the front desk clerk was supposed to bring the new one. During an interview on 1/26/23 at 1:39 p.m., Unit Manager D stated visitors were allowed in the facility typically at 9:00 a.m. but sometimes earlier. She stated the Unit Manager Assistant, was supposed to have posted the staffing information for 1/23/23 the night of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, eight of eight residents stated they did not know how to file a grievance. This failure had the potential to cause residents to feel their needs were not being met. Findings: During group meeting on 6/25/19 at 10:30 a.m., eigt of eight Residents stated they did not know how to file a grievance. Resident 16 stated, to a certain extent, she had a grievance against an aid, she made a complaint to the office staff, they wrote her issue on a piece of paper, had her sign it, but nothing else done. Resident 16 stated she did not have a lot of confidence in complaining and having something done about it. During interview and concurrent record review, with Admissions staff (Admissions keeps logs of grievances filed) on 6/28/19 at 10 a.m., the Grievance Log Book was reviewed. Admissions/SS staff indicated she had no record of Resident 16's complaint, but would check with Resident 16.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain residents' level of mobility for four of 19 sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 16, Resident 27, and Resident 49). Which had the potential to result in: Functional decline, reduced likelihood of discharge, and increased risk for depression. Findings: During an interview with Resident 16, on 6/24/19, at 10:54 a.m., she stated she wanted to go home. Resident 16 stated the facility staff did not know what to do for her. When asked if she was getting services to get stronger to assist with her ability to go home, Resident 16 said, yes, but it was not happening. During an interview with Resident 3's family member, on 6/24/19, at 2:30 p.m., he stated Resident 3 was getting therapy help, but it was stopped due to insurance. The family member expressed concern about the lack of services after therapy was completed. He said Resident 3 did well with therapy, but all the progress was lost after that. The family member was visibly frustrated; he said it was a cycle of weakness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACIFIC RETIREMENT SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA