Rogue Valley Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.73 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 28.8 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.85 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.69 to 1.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored and discarded in a timely manner, kitchen staff wore appropriate hair and beard restraints, and equipment was sanitized for 1 of 1 kitchen. This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. On 4/21/25 at approximately 12:25 PM an observation of the walk-in cooler revealed the following outdated food items: hoisin sauce expired 3/30/25, cooked peppers expired 4/20/25, cooked rice expired 4/13/25, beef base opened with no remove by date, and shredded cheese expired 4/18/25. On 4/24/25 at 8:20 AM Staff 20 (Cook) inspected the walk-in cooler and confirmed the out-dated items. 2. A review of the facility Dress Code effective 11/2024 revealed staff handling food shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair covering, hair restraints, or clothing that covers body hair. On 4/21/25 at 3:59 PM two unidentified staff were observed working on the tray line and in the kitchen area without hair restraints. Additional staff were seen with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to offer residents the opportunity to participate in the care planning process for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of the 2/16/25 BIMS assessment indicated a score of 13 (cognitively intact). On 4/21/25 at 5:16 PM Resident 6 stated she/he could not remember her/his last care conference. An 4/22/25 review of Resident 6's clincial record revealed a care conference was completed on 11/20/24. There was no indication any care conference was held between 11/20/24 and 4/22/25. On 4/24/25 at 10:49 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged a care conference had not been completed for Resident 6 since 11/2024 and stated the expectation was for care conferences to be completed quarterly for every resident.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to effectively respond to resident council concerns expressed at 3 of 4 resident council meetings reviewed. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed concerns related to resident care and quality of life. Findings include: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 11/2022 with diagnoses including diabetes. A review of the 2/16/25 BIMS assessment for Resident 6 indicated a score of 13 (cognitively intact). Resident 7 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including history of falling. A review of the 3/20/25 BIMS assessment for Resident 7 indicated a score of 13 (cognitively intact). A 4/22/25 review of the 1/20/25, 2/28/25, 3/28/25, and 4/21/25 Resident Council Minutes revealed the following: - The 1/20/25 notes indicated Resident 7 requested more activities on the weekends because they were really boring and was acknowledged by Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 3 (Activities Director). - The 2/28/25 notes indicated Resident 6 stated she/he did not know what medications she/he was taking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to obtain information related to advance directives and health care decisions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#177) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health care decisions honored. Findings include: Resident 177 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including aftercare following surgery. Assembly Clinical Records policy dated 10/2022 indicated: Clinical records needing to be readily available for emergencies such as the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) and Advance Directive are maintained as hard copies. These records will be transported with the resident upon transfer to the emergency room and or hospital as required. A 4/4/25 Health Care admission Questionnaire indicated Resident 177 did not have an Advance Directive or a POLST. On 4/23/25 at 11:57 AM Staff 4 (RCM) stated upon admission to the facility she prepared a POLST in the admission paperwork so when the physician visits the resident they can review the POLST and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide meaningful activities for dependent residents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of social interaction and isolation. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 6/2012 with diagnoses including dementia and anxiety disorder. An 10/2023 facility Activity Program policy indicated a resident's activity plan was to be updated as the resident's needs changed, but no less than quarterly. The 7/5/24 Annual MDS revealed Resident 3 had a BIMS score of 2 (severe cognitive impairment). Resident 3 was dependent on staff for all cares and staff indicated she/he liked to listen to music, be around animals, and participate in group activities. An 10/4/24 revised care plan for activities indicated staff were to help Resident 3 listen to music and encourage observation of the bird feeder outside the resident's window. Staff were to provide one-on-one visits or activities if Resident 3 was unable to attend group events. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#177) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects. Findings include: Resident 177 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including anxiety and sleep apnea (pause in breathing during sleep). Review of the clinical record on 4/22/25 revealed Resident 177 was ordered PRN Lorazepam (for anxiety) every six hours starting on 4/4/25. The Lorazepam was discontinued and restarted on 4/17/25 with no end date. Resident 177's 4/4/25 pharmacy review revealed the provider was advised PRN Lorazepam required the prescriber to provide a direct examination and rationale for continuing the medication beyond 14 days. An undated response from the physician indicated: Ensure above documentation requirements are met and on file for the medication to continue beyond 14 days. No other information was provided. On 4/24/25 at 10:31 AM Staff 1 (Administrator)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure refrigerators were free of expired and/or unlabeled foods for 1 of 2 refrigerators reviewed for food safety and sanitation. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: On 4/4/24 at 2:07 PM the following was observed in refrigerator number two: - cooked eggs in a clear container dated 3/31/24. - cut strawberries in a disposable plastic container with no date. - 13 Thirster grape concentrate 100% grape juice containers marked, Best by 10/14/23. On 4/04/24 at 2:17 PM Staff 10 (Dietary manager) confirmed the thirster, strawberries, and prepped eggs were not appropriately labeled or discarded.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown source for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and stroke. A 3/25/24 hospice note identified new large bruises to both shins, greater on the right leg. A 3/25/24 Skin and Wound Evaluation noted a new skin tear to Resident 20's right shin in the same area as the large bruise. The wound was measured to be approximately 25 cm long by six cm wide, there was missing skin and the wound was bleeding. The conclusion included in the evaluation indicated Resident 20 attempted to get out of bed and got her/his leg caught between the bed and the side rail. A 3/27/24 hospice note acknowledged the new skin tear to Resident 20's right shin, and very fragile bruised skin. On 4/2/24 at 4:14 PM Resident 20 was observed in bed with her/his feet elevated off the mattress and the bed was in a low position. There were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise a care plan timely related to catheter use for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for unmet catheter needs. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and stroke. An admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 20 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 12/7/23 resident records indicated Resident 20 was unable to empty her/his bladder and a catheter was placed. Resident 20's care plan was revised on 4/2/24 to include the catheter use. On 4/5/24 at 10:40 AM Staff 5 (LPN/MDS Coordinator) acknowledged Resident 20's care plan was not revised timely.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly assess pressure ulcers for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 20 and 88) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for unmanaged wounds. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia, stroke and on hospice services. A hospice note dated 3/21/24 indicated Resident 20 had a closed purple pressure injury/ulcer on her/his right heel. A hospice note dated 3/25/24 indicated Resident 20 had new right heel eschar (dead tissue that is usually dark, dry and hard) with a closed blister in the middle. The note added a facility nurse took a picture of the wound. A Skin and Wound Evaluation dated 3/25/24 identified a new blister to Resident 20's right heel. The wound was described as intact and black/blue in color. There were no measurements of the wound. An Incident Report dated 3/25/24 indicated the facility nurse was notified by hospice of a new DTI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACIFIC RETIREMENT SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR